@oimlsmart/primmel-packages 0.1.0

package/oiml-r91/evaluation/processes.prl

@@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
+process submit_application {
+  actor applicant
+  output { applications }
+  reference { doc "PD-05 §4.1" clause "" }
+}
+
+process review_application {
+  actor issuing_authority
+  validate_provision { /req/cs/application-completeness }
+  output { applications }
+  reference { doc "PD-05 §4.2" clause "" }
+}
+
+process accept_application {
+  actor issuing_authority
+  validate_provision { /req/cs/fee-estimate /req/cs/sample-count }
+  output { applications }
+  reference { doc "PD-05 §4.2.4" clause "" }
+}
+
+process reject_application {
+  actor issuing_authority
+  validate_provision { /req/cs/rejection-reason }
+  output { applications }
+  reference { doc "PD-05 §4.2.2" clause "" }
+}
+
+process conduct_tests {
+  actor test_laboratory
+  validate_provision { /req/metrological/mpe-stationary /req/metrological/linearity-limit /req/category-moving/mpe-moving /req/category-moving/ego-speed /req/metrological/disturbances /req/metrological/influence-quantities }
+  output { testReports formInstances }
+  reference { doc "PD-05 §4.3" clause "" }
+}
+
+process compile_test_report {
+  actor test_laboratory
+  validate_provision { /req/cs/test-report-18-elements }
+  output { testReports }
+  reference { doc "PD-05 §4.4" clause "" }
+}
+
+process compile_evaluation_report {
+  actor issuing_authority
+  validate_provision { /req/cs/evaluation-report-contents }
+  output { evaluationReports }
+  reference { doc "PD-05 §4.5" clause "" }
+}
+
+process issue_certificate {
+  actor issuing_authority
+  validate_provision { /req/cs/certificate-requirements }
+  output { certificates }
+  reference { doc "PD-05 §4.6" clause "" }
+}
+
+process register_certificate {
+  actor biml
+  validate_provision { /req/cs/biml-registration }
+  output { certificates }
+  reference { doc "PD-05 §6" clause "" }
+}
+
+process handle_revision {
+  actor issuing_authority
+  output { certificates certificateAnnexes }
+  reference { doc "PD-05 §8.1" clause "" }
+}
+
+process handle_edition_change {
+  actor issuing_authority
+  output { evaluationReports certificates }
+  reference { doc "PD-05 §8.3" clause "" }
+}
+
+process evaluate_certificate_acceptance {
+  actor utilizer
+  output { acceptanceReviews }
+  reference { doc "PD-06, 4.8/4.9; B 18:2025 §5.6.3" clause "" }
+}
+
+process handle_appeal {
+  actor executive_secretary
+  output { appeals }
+  reference { doc "PD-01, 8–9" clause "" }
+}
+
+process handle_complaint {
+  actor executive_secretary
+  output { complaints }
+  reference { doc "PD-01, 6; PD-05 §7.1" clause "" }
+}
+
+process handle_misuse {
+  actor executive_secretary
+  output { misuseCases }
+  reference { doc "PD-06, 5.1" clause "" }
+}
+
+process deregister_certificate {
+  actor biml
+  output { deregistrations certificates }
+  reference { doc "PD-01, 6.2; PD-06, 5.2/5.3; PD-05 §6.2" clause "" }
+}
+
+process verify_presented_certificate {
+  actor biml
+  output { registeredCopies }
+  reference { doc "B 18:2025 §15.8" clause "" }
+}
+
+process submit_participant_application {
+  actor applicant
+  output { participantApplications }
+  reference { doc "PD-03, 5.1; PD-04, 5.1; PD-09, 4–5; PD-02, 7" clause "" }
+}
+
+process assess_participant_competence {
+  actor executive_secretary
+  output { competenceEvidence }
+  reference { doc "PD-03, 5.2; PD-04, 5.2" clause "" }
+}
+
+process recommend_participation {
+  actor evaluator
+  output { approvalVotes }
+  reference { doc "PD-03, 5.3.2; PD-04, 5.3.2; PD-02, 8.1; OD-01, 5.6/7.9" clause "" }
+}
+
+process decide_participation {
+  actor supervisor
+  output { approvalVotes participantApplications }
+  reference { doc "PD-03, 5.3.2; PD-04, 5.3.2; PD-02, 8.2; B 18:2025 §11.4.2" clause "" }
+}
+
+process record_participant_declaration {
+  actor executive_secretary
+  output { participantDeclarations }
+  reference { doc "PD-08, 4–5; PD-03, 5.3.2/9; PD-04, 5.3.2/7" clause "" }
+}
+
+process publish_participant_register {
+  actor executive_secretary
+  output { participantApplications }
+  reference { doc "PD-03, 5.3.2; PD-04, 5.3.2; PD-08, 4; PD-09, 4–5; OD-01, 13.4" clause "" }
+}
+
+process drive_scheme_lifecycle {
+  actor biml
+  output { categorySchemes }
+  reference { doc "B 18:2025 §4.2, §15.1–15.2" clause "" }
+}
+

package/oiml-r91/evaluation/workflow.prl

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+process application {
+  note "phase: intake"
+  actor applicant
+  description "Applicant (manufacturer, distributor, or end user) submits Application declaring the instrument model family, the requested scope (matrix of model-family members per the Recommendation's specimen-selection rules), requested ANR countries, scheme (A/B), and supporting documentation."
+  validate_provision { applicant_info model_family_matrix documentation }
+  guard "Application.status = SUBMITTED"
+  guard "Application.model_family_id is not null OR Application.model_ids.length >= 1"
+}
+
+process test-request-dispatch {
+  note "phase: dispatch"
+  actor issuing-authority
+  description "IA selects one or more Test Laboratories (by accreditation scope, equipment capability, capacity) and issues a TestRequest to each, specifying which samples are shipped, which of the Recommendation's Test Report Forms the lab must complete, and the test conditions."
+  validate_provision { Application MeasuringInstrumentSample TestLaboratory }
+  guard "Each TestRequest references >= 1 MeasuringInstrumentSample"
+  guard "Each TestRequest.required_forms subset of R 91-3 form identifiers"
+  guard "TestRequest.assigned_laboratory_id is accredited for the requested accuracy classes"
+}
+
+process test-performance {
+  note "phase: testing"
+  actor test-laboratory
+  description "Test Lab accepts the TestRequest (which implies physical sample receipt), performs the tests per the Recommendation's test procedures, fills in the required Test Report Forms (one FormInstance per sample per form), and issues a TestReport that bundles all FormInstances."
+  validate_provision { TestRequest MeasuringInstrumentSample }
+  guard "TestReport.test_request_id references the TestRequest"
+  guard "TestReport contains one FormInstance per (requiredForm × sample) pair"
+  guard "TestReport.status = SUBMITTED"
+}
+
+process evaluation {
+  note "phase: evaluation"
+  actor issuing-authority
+  description "IA staff review every submitted TestReport. For each TestReport, a TestReportDetermination is recorded (ACCEPTED / REJECTED / CONDITIONALLY_ACCEPTED). For each FormInstance, a FormDetermination is recorded. The aggregate of all TestReportDeterminations determines the EvaluationReport overall_decision. Finalization requires every TestReport in test_report_ids[] to have a corresponding determination."
+  validate_provision { TestReport FormInstance }
+  guard "All TestReport entries in test_report_ids[] have a TestReportDetermination"
+  guard "EvaluationReport.status = ALL_TR_REVIEWED before finalization"
+  guard "overall_decision derivable from test_report_determinations[]"
+}
+
+process certificate-issuance {
+  note "phase: issuance"
+  actor issuing-authority
+  description "If EvaluationReport.overall_decision = APPROVED, IA issues a Certificate whose scope covers the original Application's matrix. BIML registers the certificate."
+  validate_provision { EvaluationReport Application.model_family_id }
+  guard "EvaluationReport.overall_decision = APPROVED"
+  guard "Certificate.scope matches Application scope (model family + approved members)"
+}
+

package/oiml-r91/execution/forms/evidence-file.prl

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+form r91-3/form-evidence-file {
+  name "Evidence file examination"
+  description "Examination of the enforcement evidence file produced by the speed meter per measurement (R 91-1, 6.6/7.2.2): content items a–l of 7.3, security (integrity/authenticity, 7.3), and secure medium-term storage (7.4)."
+  data_class FormInstance#data
+  conformance_process /conf/examinations/evidence-file-examination
+  section "R 91-3, p. 13"
+  requirements { /req/technical/evidence-file /req/technical/evidence-storage }
+  ref requirement "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-1:2025#clause-7.3"
+  ref requirement "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-1:2025#clause-7.4"
+  ref test-procedure "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-2:2025#clause-8"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-3:2025#clause-evidence-file"
+  field evidence_file_produced : boolean {
+    label "An evidence file is produced for every enforcement measurement (7.2.2)"
+    required true
+    targets { /req/technical/evidence-file }
+  }
+  field artifact_instance_ref : string {
+    label "Examined evidence-file artifact instance (id of the linked artifact instance)"
+    description "The artifact instance examined for this record — the instrument's produced evidence file (content contract: model/artifacts.yaml, enforcement-evidence-file). The instance carries the 7.3 a–l content; this form records only the examination."
+    required true
+    targets { /req/technical/evidence-file }
+  }
+  field contract_items_present : integer {
+    label "Number of 7.3 a–l content items present in the examined instance"
+    required true
+    measurement_method declared
+    targets { /req/technical/evidence-file }
+  }
+  field storage_secure : boolean {
+    label "Secure medium-term storage incl. integrity/authenticity protection (7.4)"
+    required true
+    targets { /req/technical/evidence-storage }
+  }
+  field examination_result : enum {
+    label "Examination result"
+    required true
+    targets { /req/technical/evidence-file }
+    enum_values { pass fail }
+  }
+}
+

package/oiml-r91/execution/forms/report-evaluation/appraisal.prl

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+form r91-4/report-appraisal {
+  name "Summary of appraisal of test data"
+  description "R 91-4 type evaluation report, section 16 — the appraisal of test data where applicable (reference OIML-CS Procedural Documents PD-05 and PD-07): the seven appraisal checks (correct method used; test data from acceptable testing facility; facility capable of performing the testing (accredited or peer assessed); test report provided in OIML format; test performed against OIML R 91 (versions); results acceptable for all the tests performed; further information/clarification needed). If there is more than one test report, the remarks indicate where the answers are not the same for all test reports by referring to the test report number from the summary table."
+  data_class FormInstance#data
+  section "R 91-4, p. 16"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-summary-of-appraisal-of-test-data-where-applicable"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-summary-of-appraisal-of-test-data-where-applicable/table-1"
+  report_rows { field appraisal item_key item }
+  field appraisal : array {
+    label "Appraisal of test data"
+    description "One row per appraisal check (Requirement | Check if yes | Remarks (provide information))"
+    required true
+    items { object fields {
+      field item : enum {
+        label "Appraisal requirement"
+        required true
+        enum_values { correct-method acceptable-facility facility-capability oiml-format oiml-r91-versions results-acceptable further-information-needed }
+      }
+      field check_yes : boolean {
+        label "Check if yes"
+        required true
+        measurement_method evaluated
+      }
+      field remarks : text {
+        label "Remarks (provide information)"
+      }
+      } }
+  }
+}
+

package/oiml-r91/execution/forms/report-evaluation/checklist-summary.prl

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+form r91-4/report-checklist-summary {
+  name "Summary of the checklist"
+  description "R 91-4 type evaluation report, section 18 — the summary of the checklist: for each test, the 'Summary of the checklist' and the 'Checklist' shall be completed according to the example (Passed/Failed marks; a test not applicable is marked '/' in both columns). The summary aggregates the evaluation per requirement area (metrological requirements R 91-1 clause 6; technical requirements R 91-1 clause 7; metrological controls R 91-1 clause 8; test procedures R 91-2) to the overall result."
+  data_class FormInstance#data
+  section "R 91-4, pp. 17-18"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-summary-of-the-checklist"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-summary-of-the-checklist/table-1"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-summary-of-the-checklist/table-2"
+  report_rows { field summary_rows item_key requirement_area }
+  field summary_rows : array {
+    label "Summary of the checklist"
+    description "One row per requirement area plus the overall result (Requirement | Passed | Failed | Remarks); a requirement area not applicable is marked '/' in both columns"
+    required true
+    items { object fields {
+      field requirement_area : enum {
+        label "Requirement area"
+        required true
+        enum_values { metrological-requirements technical-requirements metrological-controls test-procedures overall-result }
+      }
+      field passed : boolean {
+        label "Passed"
+        measurement_method evaluated
+      }
+      field failed : boolean {
+        label "Failed"
+        measurement_method evaluated
+      }
+      field not_applicable : boolean {
+        label "Not applicable ('/' in both columns)"
+        measurement_method evaluated
+      }
+      field remarks : text {
+        
+      }
+      } }
+  }
+  field summary_remarks : text {
+    label "Remarks from the summary of the checklist"
+    description "Use this page to detail remarks from the summary of the checklist"
+  }
+  pass_fail { criteria "For each test, the 'Summary of the checklist' below and the 'Checklist' in clause 1 shall be completed according to this example; the overall-result row records Passed only when every applicable requirement area passed." pass_if "ocl{summary_rows->forAll(r | r.passed or r.not_applicable)}" }
+}
+

package/oiml-r91/execution/forms/report-evaluation/checklist.prl

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+form r91-4/report-checklist {
+  name "Checklist + result"
+  description "R 91-4 type evaluation report, sections 19–20 — the evaluation checklist: the per-requirement verdict rows over OIML R 91-1 (4 Unit of measurement; 5 Categorisation; 6 Metrological requirements; 7 Technical requirements incl. evidence file, checking facilities, software; 8 Metrological controls) with Passed/Failed marks and remarks, and the overall Result (Pass / Fail). The words or condensed sentences of the checklist remind the examiner of the requirements of R 91-1 and -2 without reproducing them."
+  data_class FormInstance#data
+  section "R 91-4, pp. 19-21"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-checklist"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-checklist/table-1"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-checklist/table-2"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-result"
+  report_rows { field checklist_rows item_key clause_ref }
+  field application_no : string {
+    label "Application no."
+    required true
+    bind application.application_number
+  }
+  field instrument_type_designation : string {
+    label "Type designation"
+    description "Type designation of the speed meter under evaluation (named instrument_type_designation — the C47 artifact/evidence firewall: the enforcement-evidence-file artifact carries its own type_designation contract field)"
+    required true
+    bind model.model_designation
+  }
+  field applicant : string {
+    label "Applicant"
+    required true
+  }
+  field serial_no : string {
+    label "Serial no."
+    required true
+    bind sample.serial_number
+  }
+  field date : string {
+    label "Date (yyyy-mm-dd)"
+    required true
+  }
+  field manufacturer : string {
+    label "Manufacturer"
+    required true
+  }
+  field observer : string {
+    label "Observer"
+    required true
+  }
+  field checklist_rows : array {
+    label "Checklist (OIML R 91-1 requirements)"
+    description "One row per checklist item (Requirement (OIML R 91-1) | Passed | Failed | Remarks)"
+    required true
+    items { object fields {
+      field clause_ref : enum {
+        label "Requirement (OIML R 91-1)"
+        required true
+        enum_values { unit-of-measurement categorisation metrological-requirements measuring-intervals indicated-speed-value relevant-speed-value mpe-stationary linearity-error-limit vehicle-identification distance-angle-values across-the-road-requirements influence-quantities-error doppler-radar-requirements range-finding-requirements fixed-distance-requirements average-speed-requirements image-based-requirements moving-requirements mpe-moving stationary-mode ego-speed-meter roc-minimum rated-operating-conditions climatic-class mechanical-class electromagnetic-class disturbances fault-limit-value acceptable-significant-faults other-fault-causes reaction-to-disturbances durability redundancy presumption-of-compliance technical-requirements general-principles metrological-protection intended-use examinations-possible fraud-protection measurement-software-protection indication-of-results manual-measurement-result automatic-measurement-result evidence-file storing-evidence-files checking-facilities alignment-parameters aiming-device modes enforcement-mode test-mode test-interface software software-identification intervention-prevention inscriptions-markings manual sealing verification-marks }
+      }
+      field requirement_text : string {
+        label "Requirement"
+        required true
+      }
+      field passed : boolean {
+        label "Passed"
+        measurement_method evaluated
+      }
+      field failed : boolean {
+        label "Failed"
+        measurement_method evaluated
+      }
+      field remarks : text {
+        
+      }
+      } }
+  }
+  field checklist_remarks : text {
+    label "Remarks from the checklist"
+    description "Use this page to detail remarks from the checklist"
+  }
+  pass_fail { criteria "Result: Pass — every applicable checklist row over the OIML R 91-1 requirements records Passed." pass_if "ocl{checklist_rows->forAll(r | r.passed)}" }
+}
+

package/oiml-r91/execution/forms/report-evaluation/configuration-samples.prl

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+form r91-4/report-configuration-samples {
+  name "Configuration, sample selection and adjustments"
+  description "R 91-4 type evaluation report, sections 12–14 — the configuration for type evaluation (equipment configuration, interfaces, data rates, protection options, additional devices and additional software for the instrument and/or simulator), the justification for the selection of sample(s) (in particular in case of a family of instruments or modules or if specific requirements are mentioned in OIML R 91-1 and -2), and the identification of any authorized and agreed upon adjustments or modifications made to the sample or samples during the evaluation"
+  data_class FormInstance#data
+  section "R 91-4, pp. 12-14"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-configuration-for-type-evaluation"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-selection-of-sample-s"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-adjustments-or-modifications"
+  field configuration_details : text {
+    label "Configuration for type evaluation"
+    description "Use this space for additional information relating to equipment configuration, interfaces, data rates, protection options, additional devices and additional software for the instrument and/or simulator to support type evaluation"
+  }
+  field sample_selection_justification : text {
+    label "Selection of sample(s)"
+    description "Use this space for additional information relating to the justification for the selection of sample(s), in particular in case of a family of instruments or modules or if specific requirements are mentioned in OIML R 91-1 and -2 (if applicable)"
+  }
+  field adjustments_or_modifications : text {
+    label "Adjustments or modifications"
+    description "Use this space for additional information relating to the identification of any authorized and agreed upon adjustments or modifications made to the sample or samples during the evaluation"
+  }
+}
+

package/oiml-r91/execution/forms/report-evaluation/corrective-actions.prl

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+form r91-4/report-corrective-actions {
+  name "Corrective actions required"
+  description "R 91-4 type evaluation report, section 17 — the corrective actions required before the evaluation can conclude (Issue identified | Details of corrective action required)"
+  data_class FormInstance#data
+  section "R 91-4, p. 16"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-corrective-actions-required"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-corrective-actions-required/table-1"
+  report_rows { field corrective_actions item_key issue_identified }
+  field corrective_actions : array {
+    label "Corrective actions required"
+    description "One row per issue identified with the details of the corrective action required"
+    items { object fields {
+      field issue_identified : string {
+        label "Issue identified"
+        required true
+      }
+      field corrective_action : text {
+        label "Details of corrective action required"
+        required true
+      }
+      } }
+  }
+}
+

package/oiml-r91/execution/forms/report-evaluation/descriptions.prl

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+form r91-4/report-descriptions {
+  name "Instrument descriptions"
+  description "R 91-4 type evaluation report, sections 5–11 — the evaluator's point-form descriptions of the instrument carried over from the test report: indications and controls; evidence file for measurement (type of file, encryption, content, storage, retrieval, authentication); checking facility (automatic and/or manual triggering, outcomes); alignment procedure and use of aiming device; test interface (access, parameters); software protection means with the version present at the time of evaluation and its verification; physical and electronic seals incl. remote access abilities"
+  data_class FormInstance#data
+  section "R 91-4, p. 11"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-indications-and-controls"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-evidence-file"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-checking-facility"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-alignment-and-aiming-device"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-test-interface"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-software"
+  ref report-format "urn:oiml:pub:r:91-4:2025#clause-sealing"
+  field indications_and_controls : text {
+    label "Indications and controls"
+    description "Describe, using point form, all indications and controls of the instrument (such as wired or wireless communication with the instrument, installation, ready indication, error codes)"
+    required true
+  }
+  field evidence_file : text {
+    label "Evidence file"
+    description "Describe, using point form, evidence file for measurement (type of file, encryption, content, storage, retrieval, authentication)"
+    required true
+  }
+  field checking_facility : text {
+    label "Checking facility"
+    description "Describe, using point form, checking facility (automatic and/or manual triggering, outcomes)"
+    required true
+  }
+  field alignment_and_aiming : text {
+    label "Alignment and aiming device"
+    description "Describe, using point form, alignment procedure and use of aiming device, if applicable"
+  }
+  field test_interface : text {
+    label "Test interface"
+    description "Describe, using point form, test interface (access, parameters)"
+  }
+  field software : text {
+    label "Software"
+    description "Describe, using point form, the means used to protect legally relevant software in the instrument and indicate the version of the software present at the time of evaluation and how to verify this version number"
+    required true
+  }
+  field sealing : text {
+    label "Sealing"
+    description "Describe, using point form, the physical and electronic seals (e.g. audit trails) used to protect the metrological characteristics of the instrument, and how to access them; also describe any remote access abilities available and how these are sealed"
+    required true
+  }
+}
+