sinapse-ai 1.0.0

package/squad-storytelling/tasks/unblock-creative.md

@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+---
+task: "unblock-creative"
+responsavel: "keith-johnstone"
+responsavel_type: "agent"
+atomic_layer: true
+elicit: true
+Entrada:
+  - "Description of the creative block"
+Saida:
+  - "Block diagnosis with tailored exercises and micro-goal"
+Checklist:
+  - "[ ] Block type diagnosed with emotional root identified"
+  - "[ ] At least 3 exercises prescribed and explained"
+  - "[ ] Micro-goal set for immediate action"
+---
+
+# Task: Creative Unblocking
+
+**Task ID:** NARR-016
+**Version:** 1.0.0
+**Command:** `*unblock-creative`
+**Agent:** Keith Johnstone (keith-johnstone)
+**Purpose:** Diagnose and overcome creative blocks using improvisation techniques and story games.
+
+---
+
+## Inputs
+
+| Input | Source | Required |
+|-------|--------|----------|
+| `block_description` | User describes their stuck point | YES |
+| `project_context` | What they are working on | PREFERRED |
+| `what_theyve_tried` | Previous attempts to unblock | NO |
+| `deadline_pressure` | Time constraints | NO |
+
+## Execution Phases
+
+### Phase 1: Diagnose Block
+
+1. Identify the type:
+   - **Fear of failure** — Inner critic too loud (most common)
+   - **Perfectionism** — Refusing to produce anything less than perfect
+   - **Status anxiety** — Fear of looking foolish
+   - **Decision paralysis** — Too many options
+   - **Burnout** — Creative exhaustion
+   - **Lost thread** — Started strong, lost direction
+   - **Blank page** — No starting point at all
+2. Assess severity (mild/moderate/severe)
+3. Identify the emotional root
+4. Look for patterns
+
+### Phase 2: Improv Exercises
+
+1. **"Yes, And"** — Write 10 terrible ideas, then build on each
+2. **Status Shift** — Reverse power dynamics in the stuck story
+3. **Blind Offer** — Write the next scene without knowing where it goes
+4. **Tilt** — Introduce an unexpected element that changes everything
+5. **Free Association** — Write without stopping for 10 minutes
+
+### Phase 3: Story Games
+
+1. **The Boring Version** — Write the most obvious version (paradoxically reveals the interesting one)
+2. **The Worst Version** — Deliberately write terribly (defeats perfectionism)
+3. **Character Interview** — Let the character speak for themselves
+4. **Constraint Box** — Add arbitrary constraints to force creativity
+5. **Steal from Life** — Mine personal experience for material
+
+### Phase 4: Reframe & Reconnect
+
+1. Reframe the block as information
+2. Identify what IS working
+3. Reconnect with original impulse
+4. Set a micro-goal (one paragraph, not one chapter)
+5. Schedule the next creative session
+
+## Output Format
+
+```yaml
+creative_unblock:
+  block_type: "{diagnosed type}"
+  severity: "mild | moderate | severe"
+  emotional_root: "{underlying feeling}"
+  diagnosis: |
+    {Why the block is happening and what it signals}
+  exercises_prescribed:
+    - exercise: "{name}"
+      instructions: "{step by step}"
+      purpose: "{why this helps}"
+      time_required: "{duration}"
+  reframe: |
+    {How to see the block differently}
+  micro_goal: "{immediate small action}"
+  ongoing_practice: "{habit to prevent recurrence}"
+```
+
+## Veto Conditions
+
+- **NEVER** tell someone to "just push through"
+- **NEVER** critique the user's existing work during unblocking
+- **NEVER** add pressure — it makes blocks worse
+- **NEVER** prescribe a single approach — always offer multiple exercises
+- **NEVER** dismiss the block as laziness
+
+## Completion Criteria
+
+- [ ] Block type diagnosed with emotional root
+- [ ] At least 3 exercises prescribed and tailored
+- [ ] Each exercise explained with clear instructions
+- [ ] Block reframed as information
+- [ ] Micro-goal set for immediate action
+- [ ] Ongoing practice recommended

package/squad-storytelling/tasks/video-script-beat-sheet.md

@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+---
+task: "video-script-beat-sheet"
+responsavel: "blake-snyder"
+responsavel_type: "agent"
+atomic_layer: true
+elicit: true
+Entrada:
+  - "Video concept, purpose, and target audience"
+  - "Video length and platform"
+Saida:
+  - "Complete video script structured with Save the Cat beat sheet"
+Checklist:
+  - "[ ] All 15 beats mapped to video timeline"
+  - "[ ] Opening hook captures attention in first 5 seconds"
+  - "[ ] Emotional beats timed for audience retention"
+---
+
+# Task: Video Script Using Beat Sheet
+
+**Task ID:** NARR-024
+**Version:** 1.0.0
+**Command:** `*video-script-beat-sheet`
+**Agent:** Blake Snyder (blake-snyder)
+**Purpose:** Create compelling video scripts using Save the Cat's 15-beat structure, adapted for marketing, educational, and brand videos of any length.
+
+---
+
+## Inputs
+
+| Input | Source | Required |
+|-------|--------|----------|
+| `video_concept` | What the video is about | YES |
+| `video_purpose` | Brand awareness, conversion, education, testimonial | YES |
+| `target_audience` | Who will watch | YES |
+| `video_length` | Duration (30s, 60s, 2min, 5min, 10min+) | YES |
+| `platform` | YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, website | PREFERRED |
+| `brand_guidelines` | Tone, visual style, do/don't | NO |
+
+## Execution Phases
+
+### Phase 1: Adapt Beat Sheet to Video Length
+
+Map the 15 beats to the video's runtime:
+
+| Beat | % of Runtime | 60s Video | 5min Video |
+|------|-------------|-----------|------------|
+| Opening Image | 0-1% | 0-1s | 0-3s |
+| Theme Stated | 5% | 3s | 15s |
+| Set-Up | 1-10% | 1-6s | 3-30s |
+| Catalyst | 10% | 6s | 30s |
+| Debate | 10-25% | 6-15s | 30-75s |
+| Break into Two | 25% | 15s | 75s |
+| B Story | 30% | 18s | 90s |
+| Fun and Games | 30-50% | 18-30s | 90-150s |
+| Midpoint | 50% | 30s | 150s |
+| Bad Guys Close In | 50-75% | 30-45s | 150-225s |
+| All Is Lost | 75% | 45s | 225s |
+| Dark Night of the Soul | 75-80% | 45-48s | 225-240s |
+| Break into Three | 80% | 48s | 240s |
+| Finale | 80-99% | 48-59s | 240-297s |
+| Final Image | 99-100% | 59-60s | 297-300s |
+
+### Phase 2: Write Each Beat
+
+For each beat, define:
+1. **Visual** — What does the viewer see?
+2. **Audio** — Narration, dialogue, music, sound effects
+3. **Text overlay** — On-screen text (if applicable)
+4. **Emotional target** — What should the viewer feel?
+5. **Retention hook** — Why they keep watching past this point
+
+### Phase 3: Optimize the Critical Beats
+
+1. **Opening Image** — Must hook in 3-5 seconds; pattern interrupt or bold statement
+2. **Catalyst** — The moment the viewer's problem is named; they lean in
+3. **Fun and Games** — The "promise of the premise"; deliver what they came for
+4. **Midpoint** — False victory or false defeat; raises stakes
+5. **All Is Lost** — The emotional low that makes the resolution satisfying
+6. **Final Image** — Mirror of opening but transformed; the CTA lives here
+
+### Phase 4: Platform Optimization
+
+1. Adapt pacing for platform attention spans (TikTok: rapid beats; YouTube: can breathe)
+2. Design thumbnail moment (the single most visually compelling frame)
+3. Place retention hooks at algorithm-critical moments (30s for YouTube, 3s for TikTok)
+4. Design the "scroll-stopper" — first 1-2 seconds that prevent scrolling past
+5. Optimize for sound-off viewing (captions, visual storytelling)
+
+### Phase 5: Script Assembly
+
+1. Write the complete script with timecodes
+2. Add stage directions for filming/animation
+3. Include music/mood notes for each section
+4. Write 3 title/thumbnail options
+5. Create a shot list derived from the beat sheet
+
+## Output Format
+
+```yaml
+video_script:
+  title: "{video title}"
+  platform: "{platform}"
+  duration: "{length}"
+  purpose: "{goal}"
+  logline: "{one-sentence summary}"
+  beat_sheet:
+    - beat: "Opening Image"
+      timecode: "0:00-0:03"
+      visual: "{what viewer sees}"
+      audio: "{narration/music}"
+      text_overlay: "{on-screen text}"
+      emotional_target: "{feeling}"
+    # ... all 15 beats
+  scroll_stopper: "{first 1-2 seconds description}"
+  thumbnail_moment: "{most compelling visual frame}"
+  retention_hooks:
+    - timecode: ""
+      hook: "{why they keep watching}"
+  cta: "{call to action and placement}"
+  title_options: ["{option 1}", "{option 2}", "{option 3}"]
+  shot_list: ["{derived from beats}"]
+```
+
+## Veto Conditions
+
+- **NEVER** start a video without a hook in the first 3-5 seconds
+- **NEVER** skip the Catalyst — the audience must know why they should care
+- **NEVER** treat Fun and Games as filler — it is the core value delivery
+- **NEVER** bury the CTA — it must feel like the natural Final Image, not an afterthought
+
+## Completion Criteria
+
+- [ ] All 15 beats mapped to video timeline with timecodes
+- [ ] Opening hook designed for platform-specific attention span
+- [ ] Each beat has visual, audio, and emotional specifications
+- [ ] Platform optimization applied (retention hooks, sound-off design)
+- [ ] Script assembled with stage directions and music notes
+- [ ] Title/thumbnail options provided

package/squad-storytelling/tasks/website-narrative-audit.md

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+---
+task: "website-narrative-audit"
+responsavel: "park-howell"
+responsavel_type: "agent"
+atomic_layer: true
+elicit: true
+Entrada:
+  - "Website URL or copy"
+  - "Brand context and target customer"
+Saida:
+  - "Complete narrative audit with SB7 gap analysis and rewrite recommendations"
+Checklist:
+  - "[ ] Every page audited against SB7 framework"
+  - "[ ] AAA vs ABT patterns identified throughout copy"
+  - "[ ] Specific rewrite recommendations with before/after examples"
+---
+
+# Task: Website Narrative Audit
+
+**Task ID:** NARR-040
+**Version:** 1.0.0
+**Command:** `*website-narrative-audit`
+**Agent:** Park Howell (park-howell)
+**Purpose:** Audit website copy through the SB7 and ABT lens, identifying where the narrative breaks down and providing specific rewrite recommendations.
+
+---
+
+## Inputs
+
+| Input | Source | Required |
+|-------|--------|----------|
+| `website` | URL or copy from key pages | YES |
+| `brand_context` | What the brand does and who it serves | YES |
+| `target_customer` | Customer profile and pain points | YES |
+| `business_goal` | What the website should achieve | PREFERRED |
+| `brandscript` | Existing BrandScript (if available) | NO |
+
+## Execution Phases
+
+### Phase 1: AAA vs ABT Diagnosis
+
+1. Read ALL website copy and classify each section:
+   - **AAA (And, And, And)** — "We do this AND this AND this" (boring, no conflict)
+   - **ABT (And, But, Therefore)** — "The world is X, BUT Y is a problem, THEREFORE we Z" (story)
+   - **DHY (Despite, However, Yet)** — Contradiction that confuses the reader
+2. Calculate the AAA ratio — what percentage of copy is non-narrative?
+3. Identify the biggest "narrative void" — where is the story most needed?
+4. Flag jargon and insider language that distances the customer
+
+### Phase 2: SB7 Element Audit
+
+For each key page (Home, About, Product, Pricing, Contact), check:
+
+| SB7 Element | Present? | Quality (1-5) | Location on Page |
+|-------------|----------|---------------|------------------|
+| Character (customer want) | | | |
+| Problem (external/internal/philosophical) | | | |
+| Guide (empathy + authority) | | | |
+| Plan (3-step simplification) | | | |
+| Call to Action (direct + transitional) | | | |
+| Failure (stakes of inaction) | | | |
+| Success (aspirational outcome) | | | |
+
+### Phase 3: Page-by-Page Analysis
+
+1. **Homepage:**
+   - Does the header pass the "grunt test"? (In 5 seconds: what do you offer, how does it make my life better, what do I do next?)
+   - Is the customer positioned as the hero?
+   - Is there a clear CTA above the fold?
+   - Does the page tell a story or list features?
+2. **About Page:**
+   - Is this about the brand's story in service of the customer? Or just corporate history?
+   - Does it establish guide credentials (empathy + authority)?
+3. **Product/Service Pages:**
+   - Are features presented as the plan? (how they solve the problem)
+   - Is the internal problem addressed? (not just functional benefits)
+4. **Pricing Page:**
+   - Does it address failure stakes? (cost of NOT buying)
+   - Is risk reduced? (guarantees, trials)
+
+### Phase 4: Create Rewrite Recommendations
+
+For each identified issue:
+1. Quote the current copy (before)
+2. Identify the narrative problem (diagnosis)
+3. Write the recommended rewrite (after)
+4. Explain why the rewrite works better (ABT principle applied)
+5. Prioritize rewrites by impact: HIGH (homepage, CTAs), MEDIUM (product pages), LOW (footer)
+
+### Phase 5: Build the Narrative Improvement Plan
+
+1. Rank all recommendations by impact and effort
+2. Create a "Quick Wins" list — changes that can be made today
+3. Create a "Strategic Rewrites" list — pages that need full restructuring
+4. Provide the overall narrative score (1-10) with breakdown by SB7 element
+5. Design the implementation sequence: which pages to fix first for maximum impact
+6. Create before/after mockup for the homepage structure
+
+## Output Format
+
+```yaml
+website_narrative_audit:
+  website: "{URL}"
+  overall_score: "{1-10}"
+  aaa_ratio: "{percentage of non-narrative copy}"
+  biggest_void: "{where story is most needed}"
+  sb7_audit:
+    homepage:
+      grunt_test: "{pass/fail}"
+      elements_present: ["{which SB7 elements}"]
+      elements_missing: ["{which are absent}"]
+      score: "{1-5}"
+    about:
+      score: "{1-5}"
+      issues: ["{specific problems}"]
+    product:
+      score: "{1-5}"
+      issues: ["{specific problems}"]
+  rewrite_recommendations:
+    - page: "{which page}"
+      priority: "{high/medium/low}"
+      current_copy: "{before}"
+      problem: "{narrative diagnosis}"
+      recommended_copy: "{after}"
+      principle: "{ABT/SB7 principle applied}"
+  improvement_plan:
+    quick_wins: ["{immediate changes}"]
+    strategic_rewrites: ["{full page restructures}"]
+    implementation_sequence: ["{page order by impact}"]
+    homepage_wireframe: "{restructured layout with SB7 mapping}"
+```
+
+## Veto Conditions
+
+- **NEVER** audit without understanding the customer — the audit is FROM the customer's perspective
+- **NEVER** recommend "more copy" as the solution — clarity beats volume
+- **NEVER** ignore the homepage — it is the most impactful page to fix
+- **NEVER** provide vague recommendations — every suggestion must include specific rewrite copy
+
+## Completion Criteria
+
+- [ ] Every key page audited against SB7 framework
+- [ ] AAA vs ABT patterns identified and quantified
+- [ ] Specific rewrite recommendations with before/after copy
+- [ ] Recommendations prioritized by impact
+- [ ] Quick wins separated from strategic rewrites
+- [ ] Homepage restructure wireframe provided

package/squad-storytelling/tasks/workshop-narrative-design.md

@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+---
+task: "workshop-narrative-design"
+responsavel: "nancy-duarte"
+responsavel_type: "agent"
+atomic_layer: true
+elicit: true
+Entrada:
+  - "Workshop topic and learning objectives"
+  - "Participant profile and group size"
+Saida:
+  - "Workshop design with narrative arc, Sparkline structure, and participatory moments"
+Checklist:
+  - "[ ] Workshop follows Sparkline arc with experiential learning moments"
+  - "[ ] Each module has its own What Is / What Could Be cycle"
+  - "[ ] Participatory STAR moments designed for knowledge retention"
+---
+
+# Task: Design Workshop Narrative
+
+**Task ID:** NARR-033
+**Version:** 1.0.0
+**Command:** `*workshop-narrative-design`
+**Agent:** Nancy Duarte (nancy-duarte)
+**Purpose:** Design workshop experiences using Duarte's narrative principles, creating learning journeys that transform participants through story, not just information transfer.
+
+---
+
+## Inputs
+
+| Input | Source | Required |
+|-------|--------|----------|
+| `topic` | Workshop subject matter | YES |
+| `learning_objectives` | What participants should be able to do after | YES |
+| `participants` | Profile, knowledge level, motivation | YES |
+| `duration` | Workshop length (half-day, full-day, multi-day) | YES |
+| `format` | In-person, virtual, hybrid | PREFERRED |
+| `group_size` | Number of participants | NO |
+
+## Execution Phases
+
+### Phase 1: Design the Workshop Sparkline
+
+1. **Opening What Is** — Where participants are NOW with this topic (acknowledge their reality)
+2. **What Could Be** — Where they will be by the end (the transformation promise)
+3. Design 3-5 learning modules, each with its own Sparkline cycle:
+   - Module What Is: Current understanding/capability
+   - Module What Could Be: New understanding/capability after this module
+4. Build progressive complexity — each module raises the ceiling
+5. Design the "workshop STAR moment" — the single activity they will remember forever
+6. Close with "New Bliss" — participants practice the full transformed capability
+
+### Phase 2: Design Experiential Moments
+
+1. For each module, design a hands-on exercise that embodies the concept:
+   - Not "I'll explain X" but "You'll experience X and then we'll debrief"
+2. Apply the 70-20-10 rule to workshop time:
+   - 70% doing (exercises, practice, creation)
+   - 20% discussing (debrief, Q&A, peer sharing)
+   - 10% presenting (facilitator input)
+3. Design "failure forward" exercises — safe spaces to get it wrong and learn
+4. Create paired and group exercises that build social learning
+5. Design the "showcase" moment — participants share what they created
+
+### Phase 3: Structure the Narrative Arc
+
+1. **Act 1: Departure (First 15%)** — Hook, establish the gap, create urgency to learn
+   - Opening exercise that reveals the gap between What Is and What Could Be
+   - Brief framing of the journey ahead
+2. **Act 2: Initiation (Middle 70%)** — Progressive learning through experience
+   - Module 1: Foundation concept + exercise + debrief
+   - Module 2: Building concept + exercise + debrief
+   - Module 3: Advanced concept + exercise + debrief
+   - Workshop STAR moment (between Module 2 and 3 for maximum impact)
+3. **Act 3: Return (Final 15%)** — Integration, application, commitment
+   - Synthesis exercise: combine all concepts into one deliverable
+   - Personal action planning: "What will you do Monday?"
+   - Closing ritual: sharing commitments with the group
+
+### Phase 4: Design Facilitation Guide
+
+1. For each module, document:
+   - Facilitator talking points (script or bullets)
+   - Exercise instructions (step-by-step for participants)
+   - Debrief questions (5 questions that extract learning)
+   - Timing (with buffer for discussion overflow)
+   - Materials needed (physical or digital)
+2. Design energy management — high-energy and reflective moments alternate
+3. Plan "rescue patterns" — what to do if an exercise falls flat or runs long
+4. Create transition narratives between modules (not just "okay, next topic")
+
+### Phase 5: Design Retention Mechanisms
+
+1. Create a "workshop artifact" — something tangible participants take home
+2. Design the post-workshop follow-up narrative (email sequence, check-in)
+3. Create a one-page "cheat sheet" that captures the workshop's core frameworks
+4. Design peer accountability pairing (participants commit to check in on each other)
+5. Plan the 30-day "Return" touchpoint — revisit the transformation promise
+
+## Output Format
+
+```yaml
+workshop_design:
+  topic: "{subject}"
+  duration: "{hours}"
+  participants: "{profile and count}"
+  transformation_promise: "{What Is → What Could Be}"
+  sparkline:
+    opening: "{participant reality acknowledgment}"
+    modules:
+      - title: "{module name}"
+        what_is: "{current capability}"
+        what_could_be: "{new capability}"
+        exercise: "{hands-on activity}"
+        debrief: ["{key questions}"]
+        duration: "{minutes}"
+    star_moment:
+      activity: "{unforgettable exercise}"
+      placement: "{when in the workshop}"
+    closing: "{new bliss — full capability practice}"
+  facilitation_guide:
+    - module: "{name}"
+      talking_points: ["{key messages}"]
+      exercise_instructions: "{step by step}"
+      timing: "{minutes with buffer}"
+      materials: ["{what's needed}"]
+      rescue_pattern: "{if it goes wrong}"
+  retention:
+    artifact: "{what they take home}"
+    cheat_sheet: "{one-page framework}"
+    follow_up: "{post-workshop sequence}"
+    accountability: "{peer check-in design}"
+  energy_map:
+    - time: "{timestamp}"
+      energy: "[high/medium/reflective]"
+      activity: "{what's happening}"
+```
+
+## Veto Conditions
+
+- **NEVER** lecture for more than 10 minutes without an interactive element
+- **NEVER** skip the debrief after exercises — the learning happens in reflection
+- **NEVER** start with theory — start with experience that creates hunger for theory
+- **NEVER** end without personal action planning — workshops without commitment fade
+- **NEVER** design without energy management — afternoon slumps kill workshops
+
+## Completion Criteria
+
+- [ ] Workshop follows Sparkline arc with clear transformation promise
+- [ ] Each module has exercise, debrief, and clear learning outcome
+- [ ] STAR moment designed for maximum retention
+- [ ] Facilitation guide complete with timing, materials, and rescue patterns
+- [ ] Retention mechanisms designed (artifact, follow-up, accountability)
+- [ ] Energy map ensures engagement throughout

package/squad-storytelling/tasks/write-manifesto.md

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+---
+task: "write-manifesto"
+responsavel: "marshall-ganz"
+responsavel_type: "agent"
+atomic_layer: true
+elicit: true
+Entrada:
+  - "Movement, brand, or cause description"
+  - "Core values"
+Saida:
+  - "Complete manifesto using Public Narrative (Self, Us, Now)"
+Checklist:
+  - "[ ] Story of Self crafted with authentic personal origin"
+  - "[ ] Story of Us builds shared identity and belonging"
+  - "[ ] Manifesto text woven with rallying cry"
+---
+
+# Task: Write Movement/Brand Manifesto
+
+**Task ID:** NARR-018
+**Version:** 1.0.0
+**Command:** `*write-manifesto`
+**Agent:** Marshall Ganz (marshall-ganz)
+**Purpose:** Create a powerful manifesto using the Public Narrative framework (Story of Self, Us, Now).
+
+---
+
+## Inputs
+
+| Input | Source | Required |
+|-------|--------|----------|
+| `movement_or_brand` | User description | YES |
+| `core_values` | User specification | YES |
+| `target_community` | Who this is for | YES |
+| `urgency_trigger` | Why now? | PREFERRED |
+| `founder_story` | Personal origin narrative | PREFERRED |
+| `enemy_or_obstacle` | What the movement opposes | NO |
+
+## Execution Phases
+
+### Phase 1: Story of Self
+
+1. Identify the personal origin — what experience created the commitment?
+2. Find the choice point — the moment that changed everything
+3. Define the values expressed — what did the choice reveal?
+4. Craft the narrative — specific, vivid, emotionally honest
+5. Connect personal story to universal human experience
+6. Test: Does this answer "Why do I care?" authentically?
+
+### Phase 2: Story of Us
+
+1. Identify shared experiences — what does this community have in common?
+2. Define shared values — what does this group believe together?
+3. Find the collective challenge — what obstacle unites us?
+4. Craft moments of "we" — individual stories become communal identity
+5. Build belonging — the reader feels part of something larger
+6. Test: Does this answer "Why should WE care?" compellingly?
+
+### Phase 3: Story of Now
+
+1. Define the urgent challenge — what demands action right now?
+2. Articulate the choice — what must we decide, and what are the stakes?
+3. Create tension between hope and fear
+4. Issue the call to action — specific, achievable, immediate
+5. Paint the future — what does the world look like when we succeed?
+6. Test: Does this answer "What must we do NOW?" with urgency?
+
+### Phase 4: Manifesto Draft
+
+1. Weave all three stories into a cohesive document
+2. Open with a bold declaration — core belief stated without apology
+3. Build from personal to collective to urgent
+4. Use short, punchy sentences — meant to be spoken aloud
+5. Include the enemy or obstacle — what we stand against
+6. Close with a rallying cry — the sentence people will repeat
+7. Review for emotional power — every paragraph moves the reader
+8. Test readability — read aloud, check rhythm and cadence
+
+## Output Format
+
+```yaml
+manifesto:
+  title: "{manifesto title}"
+  movement_or_brand: "{name}"
+  core_values: ["{values}"]
+  target_community: "{audience}"
+  story_of_self:
+    origin: "{personal story}"
+    choice_point: "{the moment}"
+    values_expressed: ["{values revealed}"]
+  story_of_us:
+    shared_experience: "{what unites us}"
+    shared_values: ["{collective beliefs}"]
+    collective_challenge: "{our obstacle}"
+  story_of_now:
+    urgent_challenge: "{why now}"
+    the_choice: "{what we must decide}"
+    call_to_action: "{specific action}"
+    future_vision: "{the world we create}"
+  manifesto_text: |
+    {The full manifesto text}
+  rallying_cry: "{the one sentence people will repeat}"
+```
+
+## Veto Conditions
+
+- **NEVER** write a manifesto without genuine emotional truth
+- **NEVER** skip Story of Self — personal authenticity is the foundation
+- **NEVER** issue a call to action without defining what success looks like
+- **NEVER** create division through hatred — oppose ideas, not people
+- **NEVER** write a manifesto that could not be read aloud with conviction
+
+## Completion Criteria
+
+- [ ] Story of Self crafted with authentic personal origin
+- [ ] Story of Us builds shared identity and belonging
+- [ ] Story of Now creates urgency and defines the choice
+- [ ] All three stories woven into cohesive manifesto
+- [ ] Bold opening declaration established
+- [ ] Clear call to action with specific next steps
+- [ ] Rallying cry crafted for memorability
+- [ ] Manifesto reads powerfully when spoken aloud