opencode-skills-collection 4.0.52 → 4.0.54

package/bundled-skills/loki-mode/SKILL.md

@@ -13,85 +13,9 @@ date_added: "2026-02-27"
 
 ---
 
-## Quick Reference
+## Detailed Guide
 
-### Critical First Steps (Every Turn)
-1. **READ** `.loki/CONTINUITY.md` - Your working memory + "Mistakes & Learnings"
-2. **RETRIEVE** Relevant memories from `.loki/memory/` (episodic patterns, anti-patterns)
-3. **CHECK** `.loki/state/orchestrator.json` - Current phase/metrics
-4. **REVIEW** `.loki/queue/pending.json` - Next tasks
-5. **FOLLOW** RARV cycle: REASON, ACT, REFLECT, **VERIFY** (test your work!)
-6. **OPTIMIZE** Opus=planning, Sonnet=development, Haiku=unit tests/monitoring - 10+ Haiku agents in parallel
-7. **TRACK** Efficiency metrics: tokens, time, agent count per task
-8. **CONSOLIDATE** After task: Update episodic memory, extract patterns to semantic memory
-
-### Key Files (Priority Order)
-| File | Purpose | Update When |
-|------|---------|-------------|
-| `.loki/CONTINUITY.md` | Working memory - what am I doing NOW? | Every turn |
-| `.loki/memory/semantic/` | Generalized patterns & anti-patterns | After task completion |
-| `.loki/memory/episodic/` | Specific interaction traces | After each action |
-| `.loki/metrics/efficiency/` | Task efficiency scores & rewards | After each task |
-| `.loki/specs/openapi.yaml` | API spec - source of truth | Architecture changes |
-| `CLAUDE.md` | Project context - arch & patterns | Significant changes |
-| `.loki/queue/*.json` | Task states | Every task change |
-
-### Decision Tree: What To Do Next?
-
-```
-START
-  |
-  +-- Read CONTINUITY.md ----------+
-  |                                |
-  +-- Task in-progress?            |
-  |   +-- YES: Resume              |
-  |   +-- NO: Check pending queue  |
-  |                                |
-  +-- Pending tasks?               |
-  |   +-- YES: Claim highest priority
-  |   +-- NO: Check phase completion
-  |                                |
-  +-- Phase done?                  |
-  |   +-- YES: Advance to next phase
-  |   +-- NO: Generate tasks for phase
-  |                                |
-LOOP <-----------------------------+
-```
-
-### SDLC Phase Flow
-
-```
-Bootstrap -> Discovery -> Architecture -> Infrastructure
-     |           |            |              |
-  (Setup)   (Analyze PRD)  (Design)    (Cloud/DB Setup)
-                                             |
-Development <- QA <- Deployment <- Business Ops <- Growth Loop
-     |         |         |            |            |
- (Build)    (Test)   (Release)    (Monitor)    (Iterate)
-```
-
-### Essential Patterns
-
-**Spec-First:** `OpenAPI -> Tests -> Code -> Validate`
-**Code Review:** `Blind Review (parallel) -> Debate (if disagree) -> Devil's Advocate -> Merge`
-**Guardrails:** `Input Guard (BLOCK) -> Execute -> Output Guard (VALIDATE)` (OpenAI SDK)
-**Tripwires:** `Validation fails -> Halt execution -> Escalate or retry`
-**Fallbacks:** `Try primary -> Model fallback -> Workflow fallback -> Human escalation`
-**Explore-Plan-Code:** `Research files -> Create plan (NO CODE) -> Execute plan` (Anthropic)
-**Self-Verification:** `Code -> Test -> Fail -> Learn -> Update CONTINUITY.md -> Retry`
-**Constitutional Self-Critique:** `Generate -> Critique against principles -> Revise` (Anthropic)
-**Memory Consolidation:** `Episodic (trace) -> Pattern Extraction -> Semantic (knowledge)`
-**Hierarchical Reasoning:** `High-level planner -> Skill selection -> Local executor` (DeepMind)
-**Tool Orchestration:** `Classify Complexity -> Select Agents -> Track Efficiency -> Reward Learning`
-**Debate Verification:** `Proponent defends -> Opponent challenges -> Synthesize` (DeepMind)
-**Handoff Callbacks:** `on_handoff -> Pre-fetch context -> Transfer with data` (OpenAI SDK)
-**Narrow Scope:** `3-5 steps max -> Human review -> Continue` (HN Production)
-**Context Curation:** `Manual selection -> Focused context -> Fresh per task` (HN Production)
-**Deterministic Validation:** `LLM output -> Rule-based checks -> Retry or approve` (HN Production)
-**Routing Mode:** `Simple task -> Direct dispatch | Complex task -> Supervisor orchestration` (AWS Bedrock)
-**E2E Browser Testing:** `Playwright MCP -> Automate browser -> Verify UI features visually` (Anthropic Harness)
-
----
+Read [the detailed guide](references/detailed-guide.md) before executing this skill. It retains the complete procedure and reference material. Treat its safety, prerequisites, and validation requirements as mandatory. For focused work, load the relevant sections; for end-to-end work, read the guide completely.
 
 ## Prerequisites
 
@@ -102,626 +26,10 @@ claude
 
 ---
 
-## Core Autonomy Rules
-
-**This system runs with ZERO human intervention.**
-
-1. **NEVER ask questions** - No "Would you like me to...", "Should I...", or "What would you prefer?"
-2. **NEVER wait for confirmation** - Take immediate action
-3. **NEVER stop voluntarily** - Continue until completion promise fulfilled
-4. **NEVER suggest alternatives** - Pick best option and execute
-5. **ALWAYS use RARV cycle** - Every action follows Reason-Act-Reflect-Verify
-6. **NEVER edit `autonomy/run.sh` while running** - Editing a running bash script corrupts execution (bash reads incrementally, not all at once). If you need to fix run.sh, note it in CONTINUITY.md for the next session.
-7. **ONE FEATURE AT A TIME** - Work on exactly one feature per iteration. Complete it, commit it, verify it, then move to the next. Prevents over-commitment and ensures clean progress tracking. (Anthropic Harness Pattern)
-
-### Protected Files (Do Not Edit While Running)
-
-These files are part of the running Loki Mode process. Editing them will crash the session:
-
-| File | Reason |
-|------|--------|
-| `~/.claude/skills/loki-mode/autonomy/run.sh` | Currently executing bash script |
-| `.loki/dashboard/*` | Legacy dashboard assets; network serving is disabled |
-
-If bugs are found in these files, document them in `.loki/CONTINUITY.md` under "Pending Fixes" for manual repair after the session ends.
-
----
-
-## RARV Cycle (Every Iteration)
-
-```
-+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
-| REASON: What needs to be done next?                               |
-| - READ .loki/CONTINUITY.md first (working memory)                 |
-| - READ "Mistakes & Learnings" to avoid past errors                |
-| - Check orchestrator.json, review pending.json                    |
-| - Identify highest priority unblocked task                        |
-+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
-| ACT: Execute the task                                             |
-| - Dispatch subagent via Task tool OR execute directly             |
-| - Write code, run tests, fix issues                               |
-| - Commit changes atomically (git checkpoint)                      |
-+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
-| REFLECT: Did it work? What next?                                  |
-| - Verify task success (tests pass, no errors)                     |
-| - UPDATE .loki/CONTINUITY.md with progress                        |
-| - Check completion promise - are we done?                         |
-+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
-| VERIFY: Let AI test its own work (2-3x quality improvement)       |
-| - Run automated tests (unit, integration, E2E)                    |
-| - Check compilation/build (no errors or warnings)                 |
-| - Verify against spec (.loki/specs/openapi.yaml)                  |
-|                                                                   |
-| IF VERIFICATION FAILS:                                            |
-|   1. Capture error details (stack trace, logs)                    |
-|   2. Analyze root cause                                           |
-|   3. UPDATE CONTINUITY.md "Mistakes & Learnings"                  |
-|   4. Rollback to last good git checkpoint (if needed)             |
-|   5. Apply learning and RETRY from REASON                         |
-+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
-```
-
----
-
-## Model Selection Strategy
-
-**CRITICAL: Use the right model for each task type. Opus is ONLY for planning/architecture.**
-
-| Model | Use For | Examples |
-|-------|---------|----------|
-| **Opus 4.5** | PLANNING ONLY - Architecture & high-level decisions | System design, architecture decisions, planning, security audits |
-| **Sonnet 4.5** | DEVELOPMENT - Implementation & functional testing | Feature implementation, API endpoints, bug fixes, integration/E2E tests |
-| **Haiku 4.5** | OPERATIONS - Simple tasks & monitoring | Unit tests, docs, bash commands, linting, monitoring, file operations |
-
-### Task Tool Model Parameter
-```python
-# Opus for planning/architecture ONLY
-Task(subagent_type="Plan", model="opus", description="Design system architecture", prompt="...")
-
-# Sonnet for development and functional testing
-Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", description="Implement API endpoint", prompt="...")
-Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", description="Write integration tests", prompt="...")
-
-# Haiku for unit tests, monitoring, and simple tasks (PREFER THIS for speed)
-Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="haiku", description="Run unit tests", prompt="...")
-Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="haiku", description="Check service health", prompt="...")
-```
-
-### Opus Task Categories (RESTRICTED - Planning Only)
-- System architecture design
-- High-level planning and strategy
-- Security audits and threat modeling
-- Major refactoring decisions
-- Technology selection
-
-### Sonnet Task Categories (Development)
-- Feature implementation
-- API endpoint development
-- Bug fixes (non-trivial)
-- Integration tests and E2E tests
-- Code refactoring
-- Database migrations
-
-### Haiku Task Categories (Operations - Use Extensively)
-- Writing/running unit tests
-- Generating documentation
-- Running bash commands (npm install, git operations)
-- Simple bug fixes (typos, imports, formatting)
-- File operations, linting, static analysis
-- Monitoring, health checks, log analysis
-- Simple data transformations, boilerplate generation
-
-### Parallelization Strategy
-```python
-# Launch 10+ Haiku agents in parallel for unit test suite
-for test_file in test_files:
-    Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="haiku",
-         description=f"Run unit tests: {test_file}",
-         run_in_background=True)
-```
-
-### Advanced Task Tool Parameters
-
-**Background Agents:**
-```python
-# Launch background agent - returns immediately with output_file path
-Task(description="Long analysis task", run_in_background=True, prompt="...")
-# Output truncated to 30K chars - use Read tool to check full output file
-```
-
-**Agent Resumption (for interrupted/long-running tasks):**
-```python
-# First call returns agent_id
-result = Task(description="Complex refactor", prompt="...")
-# agent_id from result can resume later
-Task(resume="agent-abc123", prompt="Continue from where you left off")
-```
-
-**When to use `resume`:**
-- Context window limits reached mid-task
-- Rate limit recovery
-- Multi-session work on same task
-- Checkpoint/restore for critical operations
-
-### Routing Mode Optimization (AWS Bedrock Pattern)
-
-**Two dispatch modes based on task complexity - reduces latency for simple tasks:**
-
-| Mode | When to Use | Behavior |
-|------|-------------|----------|
-| **Direct Routing** | Simple, single-domain tasks | Route directly to specialist agent, skip orchestration |
-| **Supervisor Mode** | Complex, multi-step tasks | Full decomposition, coordination, result synthesis |
-
-**Decision Logic:**
-```
-Task Received
-    |
-    +-- Is task single-domain? (one file, one skill, clear scope)
-    |   +-- YES: Direct Route to specialist agent
-    |   |        - Faster (no orchestration overhead)
-    |   |        - Minimal context (avoid confusion)
-    |   |        - Examples: "Fix typo in README", "Run unit tests"
-    |   |
-    |   +-- NO: Supervisor Mode
-    |            - Full task decomposition
-    |            - Coordinate multiple agents
-    |            - Synthesize results
-    |            - Examples: "Implement auth system", "Refactor API layer"
-    |
-    +-- Fallback: If intent unclear, use Supervisor Mode
-```
-
-**Direct Routing Examples (Skip Orchestration):**
-```python
-# Simple tasks -> Direct dispatch to Haiku
-Task(model="haiku", description="Fix import in utils.py", prompt="...")       # Direct
-Task(model="haiku", description="Run linter on src/", prompt="...")           # Direct
-Task(model="haiku", description="Generate docstring for function", prompt="...")  # Direct
-
-# Complex tasks -> Supervisor orchestration (default Sonnet)
-Task(description="Implement user authentication with OAuth", prompt="...")    # Supervisor
-Task(description="Refactor database layer for performance", prompt="...")     # Supervisor
-```
-
-**Context Depth by Routing Mode:**
-- **Direct Routing:** Minimal context - just the task and relevant file(s)
-- **Supervisor Mode:** Full context - CONTINUITY.md, architectural decisions, dependencies
-
-> "Keep in mind, complex task histories might confuse simpler subagents." - AWS Best Practices
-
-### E2E Testing with Playwright MCP (Anthropic Harness Pattern)
-
-**Critical:** Features are NOT complete until verified via browser automation.
-
-```python
-# Enable Playwright MCP for E2E testing
-# In settings or via mcp_servers config:
-mcp_servers = {
-    "playwright": {"command": "npx", "args": ["@playwright/mcp@latest"]}
-}
-
-# Agent can then automate browser to verify features work visually
-```
-
-**E2E Verification Flow:**
-1. Feature implemented and unit tests pass
-2. Start dev server via init script
-3. Use Playwright MCP to automate browser
-4. Verify UI renders correctly
-5. Test user interactions (clicks, forms, navigation)
-6. Only mark feature complete after visual verification
-
-> "Claude mostly did well at verifying features end-to-end once explicitly prompted to use browser automation tools." - Anthropic Engineering
-
-**Note:** Playwright cannot detect browser-native alert modals. Use custom UI for confirmations.
-
----
-
-## Tool Orchestration & Efficiency
-
-**Inspired by NVIDIA ToolOrchestra:** Track efficiency, learn from rewards, adapt agent selection.
-
-### Efficiency Metrics (Track Every Task)
-
-| Metric | What to Track | Store In |
-|--------|---------------|----------|
-| Wall time | Seconds from start to completion | `.loki/metrics/efficiency/` |
-| Agent count | Number of subagents spawned | `.loki/metrics/efficiency/` |
-| Retry count | Attempts before success | `.loki/metrics/efficiency/` |
-| Model usage | Haiku/Sonnet/Opus call distribution | `.loki/metrics/efficiency/` |
-
-### Reward Signals (Learn From Outcomes)
-
-```
-OUTCOME REWARD:  +1.0 (success) | 0.0 (partial) | -1.0 (failure)
-EFFICIENCY REWARD: 0.0-1.0 based on resources vs baseline
-PREFERENCE REWARD: Inferred from user actions (commit/revert/edit)
-```
-
-### Dynamic Agent Selection by Complexity
-
-| Complexity | Max Agents | Planning | Development | Testing | Review |
-|------------|------------|----------|-------------|---------|--------|
-| Trivial | 1 | - | haiku | haiku | skip |
-| Simple | 2 | - | haiku | haiku | single |
-| Moderate | 4 | sonnet | sonnet | haiku | standard (3 parallel) |
-| Complex | 8 | opus | sonnet | haiku | deep (+ devil's advocate) |
-| Critical | 12 | opus | sonnet | sonnet | exhaustive + human checkpoint |
-
-See `references/tool-orchestration.md` for full implementation details.
-
----
-
-## Structured Prompting for Subagents
-
-**Single-Responsibility Principle:** Each agent should have ONE clear goal and narrow scope.
-([UiPath Best Practices](https://www.uipath.com/blog/ai/agent-builder-best-practices))
-
-**Every subagent dispatch MUST include:**
-
-```markdown
-## GOAL (What success looks like)
-[High-level objective, not just the action]
-Example: "Refactor authentication for maintainability and testability"
-NOT: "Refactor the auth file"
+## When to Use
+This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
 
 ## CONSTRAINTS (What you cannot do)
 - No third-party dependencies without approval
 - Maintain backwards compatibility with v1.x API
 - Keep response time under 200ms
-
-## CONTEXT (What you need to know)
-- Related files: [list with brief descriptions]
-- Previous attempts: [what was tried, why it failed]
-
-## OUTPUT FORMAT (What to deliver)
-- [ ] Pull request with Why/What/Trade-offs description
-- [ ] Unit tests with >90% coverage
-- [ ] Update API documentation
-
-## WHEN COMPLETE
-Report back with: WHY, WHAT, TRADE-OFFS, RISKS
-```
-
----
-
-## Quality Gates
-
-**Never ship code without passing all quality gates:**
-
-1. **Input Guardrails** - Validate scope, detect injection, check constraints (OpenAI SDK pattern)
-2. **Static Analysis** - CodeQL, ESLint/Pylint, type checking
-3. **Blind Review System** - 3 reviewers in parallel, no visibility of each other's findings
-4. **Anti-Sycophancy Check** - If unanimous approval, run Devil's Advocate reviewer
-5. **Output Guardrails** - Validate code quality, spec compliance, no secrets (tripwire on fail)
-6. **Severity-Based Blocking** - Critical/High/Medium = BLOCK; Low/Cosmetic = TODO comment
-7. **Test Coverage Gates** - Unit: 100% pass, >80% coverage; Integration: 100% pass
-
-**Guardrails Execution Modes:**
-- **Blocking**: Guardrail completes before agent starts (use for expensive operations)
-- **Parallel**: Guardrail runs with agent (use for fast checks, accept token loss risk)
-
-**Research insight:** Blind review + Devil's Advocate reduces false positives by 30% (CONSENSAGENT, 2025).
-**OpenAI insight:** "Layered defense - multiple specialized guardrails create resilient agents."
-
-See `references/quality-control.md` and `references/openai-patterns.md` for details.
-
----
-
-## Agent Types Overview
-
-Loki Mode has 37 specialized agent types across 7 swarms. The orchestrator spawns only agents needed for your project.
-
-| Swarm | Agent Count | Examples |
-|-------|-------------|----------|
-| Engineering | 8 | frontend, backend, database, mobile, api, qa, perf, infra |
-| Operations | 8 | devops, sre, security, monitor, incident, release, cost, compliance |
-| Business | 8 | marketing, sales, finance, legal, support, hr, investor, partnerships |
-| Data | 3 | ml, data-eng, analytics |
-| Product | 3 | pm, design, techwriter |
-| Growth | 4 | growth-hacker, community, success, lifecycle |
-| Review | 3 | code, business, security |
-
-See `references/agent-types.md` for complete definitions and capabilities.
-
----
-
-## Common Issues & Solutions
-
-| Issue | Cause | Solution |
-|-------|-------|----------|
-| Agent stuck/no progress | Lost context | Read `.loki/CONTINUITY.md` first thing every turn |
-| Task repeating | Not checking queue state | Check `.loki/queue/*.json` before claiming |
-| Code review failing | Skipped static analysis | Run static analysis BEFORE AI reviewers |
-| Breaking API changes | Code before spec | Follow Spec-First workflow |
-| Rate limit hit | Too many parallel agents | Check circuit breakers, use exponential backoff |
-| Tests failing after merge | Skipped quality gates | Never bypass Severity-Based Blocking |
-| Can't find what to do | Not following decision tree | Use Decision Tree, check orchestrator.json |
-| Memory/context growing | Not using ledgers | Write to ledgers after completing tasks |
-
----
-
-## Red Flags - Never Do These
-
-### Implementation Anti-Patterns
-- **NEVER** skip code review between tasks
-- **NEVER** proceed with unfixed Critical/High/Medium issues
-- **NEVER** dispatch reviewers sequentially (always parallel - 3x faster)
-- **NEVER** dispatch multiple implementation subagents in parallel (conflicts)
-- **NEVER** implement without reading task requirements first
-
-### Review Anti-Patterns
-- **NEVER** use sonnet for reviews (always opus for deep analysis)
-- **NEVER** aggregate before all 3 reviewers complete
-- **NEVER** skip re-review after fixes
-
-### System Anti-Patterns
-- **NEVER** delete .loki/state/ directory while running
-- **NEVER** manually edit queue files without file locking
-- **NEVER** skip checkpoints before major operations
-- **NEVER** ignore circuit breaker states
-
-### Always Do These
-- **ALWAYS** launch all 3 reviewers in single message (3 Task calls)
-- **ALWAYS** specify model: "opus" for each reviewer
-- **ALWAYS** wait for all reviewers before aggregating
-- **ALWAYS** fix Critical/High/Medium immediately
-- **ALWAYS** re-run ALL 3 reviewers after fixes
-- **ALWAYS** checkpoint state before spawning subagents
-
----
-
-## Multi-Tiered Fallback System
-
-**Based on OpenAI Agent Safety Patterns:**
-
-### Model-Level Fallbacks
-```
-opus -> sonnet -> haiku (if rate limited or unavailable)
-```
-
-### Workflow-Level Fallbacks
-```
-Full workflow fails -> Simplified workflow -> Decompose to subtasks -> Human escalation
-```
-
-### Human Escalation Triggers
-
-| Trigger | Action |
-|---------|--------|
-| retry_count > 3 | Pause and escalate |
-| domain in [payments, auth, pii] | Require approval |
-| confidence_score < 0.6 | Pause and escalate |
-| wall_time > expected * 3 | Pause and escalate |
-| tokens_used > budget * 0.8 | Pause and escalate |
-
-See `references/openai-patterns.md` for full fallback implementation.
-
----
-
-## AGENTS.md Integration
-
-**Read target project's AGENTS.md if exists** (OpenAI/AAIF standard):
-
-```
-Context Priority:
-1. AGENTS.md (closest to current file)
-2. CLAUDE.md (Claude-specific)
-3. .loki/CONTINUITY.md (session state)
-4. Package docs
-5. README.md
-```
-
----
-
-## Constitutional AI Principles (Anthropic)
-
-**Self-critique against explicit principles, not just learned preferences.**
-
-### Loki Mode Constitution
-
-```yaml
-core_principles:
-  - "Never delete production data without explicit backup"
-  - "Never commit secrets or credentials to version control"
-  - "Never bypass quality gates for speed"
-  - "Always verify tests pass before marking task complete"
-  - "Never claim completion without running actual tests"
-  - "Prefer simple solutions over clever ones"
-  - "Document decisions, not just code"
-  - "When unsure, reject action or flag for review"
-```
-
-### Self-Critique Workflow
-
-```
-1. Generate response/code
-2. Critique against each principle
-3. Revise if any principle violated
-4. Only then proceed with action
-```
-
-See `references/lab-research-patterns.md` for Constitutional AI implementation.
-
----
-
-## Debate-Based Verification (DeepMind)
-
-**For critical changes, use structured debate between AI critics.**
-
-```
-Proponent (defender)  -->  Presents proposal with evidence
-         |
-         v
-Opponent (challenger) -->  Finds flaws, challenges claims
-         |
-         v
-Synthesizer           -->  Weighs arguments, produces verdict
-         |
-         v
-If disagreement persists --> Escalate to human
-```
-
-**Use for:** Architecture decisions, security-sensitive changes, major refactors.
-
-See `references/lab-research-patterns.md` for debate verification details.
-
----
-
-## Production Patterns (HN 2025)
-
-**Battle-tested insights from practitioners building real systems.**
-
-### Narrow Scope Wins
-
-```yaml
-task_constraints:
-  max_steps_before_review: 3-5
-  characteristics:
-    - Specific, well-defined objectives
-    - Pre-classified inputs
-    - Deterministic success criteria
-    - Verifiable outputs
-```
-
-### Confidence-Based Routing
-
-```
-confidence >= 0.95  -->  Auto-approve with audit log
-confidence >= 0.70  -->  Quick human review
-confidence >= 0.40  -->  Detailed human review
-confidence < 0.40   -->  Escalate immediately
-```
-
-### Deterministic Outer Loops
-
-**Wrap agent outputs with rule-based validation (NOT LLM-judged):**
-
-```
-1. Agent generates output
-2. Run linter (deterministic)
-3. Run tests (deterministic)
-4. Check compilation (deterministic)
-5. Only then: human or AI review
-```
-
-### Context Engineering
-
-```yaml
-principles:
-  - "Less is more" - focused beats comprehensive
-  - Manual selection outperforms automatic RAG
-  - Fresh conversations per major task
-  - Remove outdated information aggressively
-
-context_budget:
-  target: "< 10k tokens for context"
-  reserve: "90% for model reasoning"
-```
-
-### Sub-Agents for Context Isolation
-
-**Use sub-agents to prevent token waste on noisy subtasks:**
-
-```
-Main agent (focused) --> Sub-agent (file search)
-                     --> Sub-agent (test running)
-                     --> Sub-agent (linting)
-```
-
-See `references/production-patterns.md` for full practitioner patterns.
-
----
-
-## Exit Conditions
-
-| Condition | Action |
-|-----------|--------|
-| Product launched, stable 24h | Enter growth loop mode |
-| Unrecoverable failure | Save state, halt, request human |
-| PRD updated | Diff, create delta tasks, continue |
-| Revenue target hit | Log success, continue optimization |
-| Runway < 30 days | Alert, optimize costs aggressively |
-
----
-
-## Directory Structure Overview
-
-```
-.loki/
-+-- CONTINUITY.md           # Working memory (read/update every turn)
-+-- specs/
-|   +-- openapi.yaml        # API spec - source of truth
-+-- queue/
-|   +-- pending.json        # Tasks waiting to be claimed
-|   +-- in-progress.json    # Currently executing tasks
-|   +-- completed.json      # Finished tasks
-|   +-- dead-letter.json    # Failed tasks for review
-+-- state/
-|   +-- orchestrator.json   # Master state (phase, metrics)
-|   +-- agents/             # Per-agent state files
-|   +-- circuit-breakers/   # Rate limiting state
-+-- memory/
-|   +-- episodic/           # Specific interaction traces (what happened)
-|   +-- semantic/           # Generalized patterns (how things work)
-|   +-- skills/             # Learned action sequences (how to do X)
-|   +-- ledgers/            # Agent-specific checkpoints
-|   +-- handoffs/           # Agent-to-agent transfers
-+-- metrics/
-|   +-- efficiency/         # Task efficiency scores (time, agents, retries)
-|   +-- rewards/            # Outcome/efficiency/preference rewards
-|   +-- dashboard.json      # Rolling metrics summary
-+-- artifacts/
-    +-- reports/            # Generated reports/dashboards
-```
-
-See `references/architecture.md` for full structure and state schemas.
-
----
-
-## Invocation
-
-```
-Loki Mode                           # Start fresh
-Loki Mode with PRD at path/to/prd   # Start with PRD
-```
-
-**Skill Metadata:**
-| Field | Value |
-|-------|-------|
-| Trigger | "Loki Mode" or "Loki Mode with PRD at [path]" |
-| Skip When | Need human approval, want to review plan first, single small task |
-| Related Skills | subagent-driven-development, executing-plans |
-
----
-
-## References
-
-Detailed documentation is split into reference files for progressive loading:
-
-| Reference | Content |
-|-----------|---------|
-| `references/core-workflow.md` | Full RARV cycle, CONTINUITY.md template, autonomy rules |
-| `references/quality-control.md` | Quality gates, anti-sycophancy, blind review, severity blocking |
-| `references/openai-patterns.md` | OpenAI Agents SDK: guardrails, tripwires, handoffs, fallbacks |
-| `references/lab-research-patterns.md` | DeepMind + Anthropic: Constitutional AI, debate, world models |
-| `references/production-patterns.md` | HN 2025: What actually works in production, context engineering |
-| `references/advanced-patterns.md` | 2025 research: MAR, Iter-VF, GoalAct, CONSENSAGENT |
-| `references/tool-orchestration.md` | ToolOrchestra patterns: efficiency, rewards, dynamic selection |
-| `references/memory-system.md` | Episodic/semantic memory, consolidation, Zettelkasten linking |
-| `references/agent-types.md` | All 37 agent types with full capabilities |
-| `references/task-queue.md` | Queue system, dead letter handling, circuit breakers |
-| `references/sdlc-phases.md` | All phases with detailed workflows and testing |
-| `references/spec-driven-dev.md` | OpenAPI-first workflow, validation, contract testing |
-| `references/architecture.md` | Directory structure, state schemas, bootstrap |
-| `references/mcp-integration.md` | MCP server capabilities and integration |
-| `references/claude-best-practices.md` | Boris Cherny patterns, thinking mode, ledgers |
-| `references/deployment.md` | Cloud deployment instructions per provider |
-| `references/business-ops.md` | Business operation workflows |
-
----
-
-**Version:** 2.32.0 | **Lines:** ~600 | **Research-Enhanced: Labs + HN Production Patterns**
-
-## When to Use
-This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.