casadi 3.7.2__cp314-none-manylinux2014_i686.whl

casadi/include/simde/simde-diagnostic.h

@@ -0,0 +1,428 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+ *
+ * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
+ * obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
+ * files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
+ * restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy,
+ * modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies
+ * of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+ * furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+ *
+ * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
+ * included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+ *
+ * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
+ * EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
+ * MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
+ * NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
+ * BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN
+ * ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN
+ * CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+ * SOFTWARE.
+ *
+ * Copyright:
+ *   2017-2020 Evan Nemerson <evan@nemerson.com>
+ */
+
+/* SIMDe targets a very wide range of standards and compilers, and our
+ * goal is to compile cleanly even with extremely aggressive warnings
+ * (i.e., -Weverything in clang, -Wextra in GCC, /W4 for MSVC, etc.)
+ * treated as errors.
+ *
+ * While our preference is to resolve the underlying issue a given
+ * diagnostic is warning us about, sometimes that's not possible.
+ * Fixing a warning in one compiler may cause problems in another.
+ * Sometimes a warning doesn't really apply to us (false positives),
+ * and sometimes adhering to a warning would mean dropping a feature
+ * we *know* the compiler supports since we have tested specifically
+ * for the compiler or feature.
+ *
+ * When practical, warnings are only disabled for specific code.  For
+ * a list of warnings which are enabled by default in all SIMDe code,
+ * see SIMDE_DISABLE_UNWANTED_DIAGNOSTICS.  Note that we restore the
+ * warning stack when SIMDe is done parsing, so code which includes
+ * SIMDe is not deprived of these warnings.
+ */
+
+#if !defined(SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_H)
+#define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_H
+
+#include "hedley.h"
+#include "simde-detect-clang.h"
+
+/* This is only to help us implement functions like _mm_undefined_ps. */
+#if defined(SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNINITIALIZED_)
+  #undef SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNINITIALIZED_
+#endif
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wuninitialized")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNINITIALIZED_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wuninitialized\"")
+#elif HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(4,2,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNINITIALIZED_ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wuninitialized\"")
+#elif HEDLEY_PGI_VERSION_CHECK(19,10,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNINITIALIZED_ _Pragma("diag_suppress 549")
+#elif HEDLEY_SUNPRO_VERSION_CHECK(5,14,0) && defined(__cplusplus)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNINITIALIZED_ _Pragma("error_messages(off,SEC_UNINITIALIZED_MEM_READ,SEC_UNDEFINED_RETURN_VALUE,unassigned)")
+#elif HEDLEY_SUNPRO_VERSION_CHECK(5,14,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNINITIALIZED_ _Pragma("error_messages(off,SEC_UNINITIALIZED_MEM_READ,SEC_UNDEFINED_RETURN_VALUE)")
+#elif HEDLEY_SUNPRO_VERSION_CHECK(5,12,0) && defined(__cplusplus)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNINITIALIZED_ _Pragma("error_messages(off,unassigned)")
+#elif \
+     HEDLEY_TI_VERSION_CHECK(16,9,9) || \
+     HEDLEY_TI_CL6X_VERSION_CHECK(8,0,0) || \
+     HEDLEY_TI_CL7X_VERSION_CHECK(1,2,0) || \
+     HEDLEY_TI_CLPRU_VERSION_CHECK(2,3,2)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNINITIALIZED_ _Pragma("diag_suppress 551")
+#elif HEDLEY_INTEL_VERSION_CHECK(13,0,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNINITIALIZED_ _Pragma("warning(disable:592)")
+#elif HEDLEY_MSVC_VERSION_CHECK(19,0,0) && !defined(__MSVC_RUNTIME_CHECKS)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNINITIALIZED_ __pragma(warning(disable:4700))
+#endif
+
+/* GCC emits a lot of "notes" about the ABI being different for things
+ * in newer versions of GCC.  We don't really care because all our
+ * functions are inlined and don't generate ABI. */
+#if HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(7,0,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PSABI_ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wpsabi\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PSABI_
+#endif
+
+/* Since MMX uses x87 FP registers, you're supposed to call _mm_empty()
+ * after each MMX function before any floating point instructions.
+ * Some compilers warn about functions which use MMX functions but
+ * don't call _mm_empty().  However, since SIMDe is implementyng the
+ * MMX API we shouldn't be calling _mm_empty(); we leave it to the
+ * caller to invoke simde_mm_empty(). */
+#if HEDLEY_INTEL_VERSION_CHECK(19,0,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_NO_EMMS_INSTRUCTION_ _Pragma("warning(disable:13200 13203)")
+#elif defined(HEDLEY_MSVC_VERSION)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_NO_EMMS_INSTRUCTION_ __pragma(warning(disable:4799))
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_NO_EMMS_INSTRUCTION_
+#endif
+
+/* Intel is pushing people to use OpenMP SIMD instead of Cilk+, so they
+ * emit a diagnostic if you use #pragma simd instead of
+ * #pragma omp simd.  SIMDe supports OpenMP SIMD, you just need to
+ * compile with -qopenmp or -qopenmp-simd and define
+ * SIMDE_ENABLE_OPENMP.  Cilk+ is just a fallback. */
+#if HEDLEY_INTEL_VERSION_CHECK(18,0,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_SIMD_PRAGMA_DEPRECATED_ _Pragma("warning(disable:3948)")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_SIMD_PRAGMA_DEPRECATED_
+#endif
+
+/* MSVC emits a diagnostic when we call a function (like
+ * simde_mm_set_epi32) while initializing a struct.  We currently do
+ * this a *lot* in the tests. */
+#if \
+  defined(HEDLEY_MSVC_VERSION)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_NON_CONSTANT_AGGREGATE_INITIALIZER_ __pragma(warning(disable:4204))
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_NON_CONSTANT_AGGREGATE_INITIALIZER_
+#endif
+
+/* This warning needs a lot of work.  It is triggered if all you do is
+ * pass the value to memcpy/__builtin_memcpy, or if you initialize a
+ * member of the union, even if that member takes up the entire union.
+ * Last tested with clang-10, hopefully things will improve in the
+ * future; if clang fixes this I'd love to enable it. */
+#if \
+  HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wconditional-uninitialized")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_CONDITIONAL_UNINITIALIZED_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wconditional-uninitialized\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_CONDITIONAL_UNINITIALIZED_
+#endif
+
+/* This warning is meant to catch things like `0.3 + 0.4 == 0.7`, which
+ * will is false.  However, SIMDe uses these operations exclusively
+ * for things like _mm_cmpeq_ps, for which we really do want to check
+ * for equality (or inequality).
+ *
+ * If someone wants to put together a SIMDE_FLOAT_EQUAL(a, op, b) macro
+ * which just wraps a check in some code do disable this diagnostic I'd
+ * be happy to accept it. */
+#if \
+  HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wfloat-equal") || \
+  HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(3,0,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_FLOAT_EQUAL_ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wfloat-equal\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_FLOAT_EQUAL_
+#endif
+
+/* This is because we use HEDLEY_STATIC_ASSERT for static assertions.
+ * If Hedley can't find an implementation it will preprocess to
+ * nothing, which means there will be a trailing semi-colon. */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wextra-semi")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_EXTRA_SEMI_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wextra-semi\"")
+#elif HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(8,1,0) && defined(__cplusplus)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_EXTRA_SEMI_ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wextra-semi\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_EXTRA_SEMI_
+#endif
+
+/* We do use a few variadic macros, which technically aren't available
+ * until C99 and C++11, but every compiler I'm aware of has supported
+ * them for much longer.  That said, usage is isolated to the test
+ * suite and compilers known to support them. */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wvariadic-macros") || HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(4,0,0)
+  #if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wc++98-compat-pedantic")
+    #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_VARIADIC_MACROS_ \
+      _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wvariadic-macros\"") \
+      _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wc++98-compat-pedantic\"")
+  #else
+    #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_VARIADIC_MACROS_ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wvariadic-macros\"")
+  #endif
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_VARIADIC_MACROS_
+#endif
+
+/* emscripten requires us to use a __wasm_unimplemented_simd128__ macro
+ * before we can access certain SIMD intrinsics, but this diagnostic
+ * warns about it being a reserved name.  It is a reserved name, but
+ * it's reserved for the compiler and we are using it to convey
+ * information to the compiler.
+ *
+ * This is also used when enabling native aliases since we don't get to
+ * choose the macro names. */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wdouble-promotion")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_RESERVED_ID_MACRO_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wreserved-id-macro\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_RESERVED_ID_MACRO_
+#endif
+
+/* clang 3.8 warns about the packed attribute being unnecessary when
+ * used in the _mm_loadu_* functions.  That *may* be true for version
+ * 3.8, but for later versions it is crucial in order to make unaligned
+ * access safe. */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wpacked")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PACKED_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wpacked\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PACKED_
+#endif
+
+/* Triggered when assigning a float to a double implicitly.  We use
+ * explicit casts in SIMDe, this is only used in the test suite. */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wdouble-promotion")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_DOUBLE_PROMOTION_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wdouble-promotion\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_DOUBLE_PROMOTION_
+#endif
+
+/* Several compilers treat conformant array parameters as VLAs.  We
+ * test to make sure we're in C mode (C++ doesn't support CAPs), and
+ * that the version of the standard supports CAPs.  We also reject
+ * some buggy compilers like MSVC (the logic is in Hedley if you want
+ * to take a look), but with certain warnings enabled some compilers
+ * still like to emit a diagnostic. */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wvla")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_VLA_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wvla\"")
+#elif HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(4,3,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_VLA_ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wvla\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_VLA_
+#endif
+
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wused-but-marked-unused")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_USED_BUT_MARKED_UNUSED_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wused-but-marked-unused\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_USED_BUT_MARKED_UNUSED_
+#endif
+
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wunused-function")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNUSED_FUNCTION_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wunused-function\"")
+#elif HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(3,4,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNUSED_FUNCTION_ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wunused-function\"")
+#elif HEDLEY_MSVC_VERSION_CHECK(19,0,0) /* Likely goes back further */
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNUSED_FUNCTION_ __pragma(warning(disable:4505))
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNUSED_FUNCTION_
+#endif
+
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wpass-failed")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PASS_FAILED_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wpass-failed\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PASS_FAILED_
+#endif
+
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wpadded")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PADDED_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wpadded\"")
+#elif HEDLEY_MSVC_VERSION_CHECK(19,0,0) /* Likely goes back further */
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PADDED_ __pragma(warning(disable:4324))
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PADDED_
+#endif
+
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_ZERO_AS_NULL_POINTER_CONSTANT_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_ZERO_AS_NULL_POINTER_CONSTANT_
+#endif
+
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wold-style-cast")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_OLD_STYLE_CAST_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wold-style-cast\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_OLD_STYLE_CAST_
+#endif
+
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wcast-function-type") || HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(8,0,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_CAST_FUNCTION_TYPE_ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wcast-function-type\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_CAST_FUNCTION_TYPE_
+#endif
+
+/* clang will emit this warning when we use C99 extensions whan not in
+ * C99 mode, even though it does support this.  In such cases we check
+ * the compiler and version first, so we know it's not a problem. */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wc99-extensions")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_C99_EXTENSIONS_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wc99-extensions\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_C99_EXTENSIONS_
+#endif
+
+/* https://github.com/simd-everywhere/simde/issues/277 */
+#if defined(HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION) && HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(4,6,0) && !HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(6,4,0) && defined(__cplusplus)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_BUGGY_UNUSED_BUT_SET_VARIBALE_ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wunused-but-set-variable\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_BUGGY_UNUSED_BUT_SET_VARIBALE_
+#endif
+
+/* This is the warning that you normally define _CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS
+ * to silence, but you have to do that before including anything and
+ * that would require reordering includes. */
+#if defined(_MSC_VER)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_ANNEX_K_ __pragma(warning(disable:4996))
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_ANNEX_K_
+#endif
+
+/* Some compilers, such as clang, may use `long long` for 64-bit
+ * integers, but `long long` triggers a diagnostic with
+ * -Wc++98-compat-pedantic which says 'long long' is incompatible with
+ * C++98. */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wc++98-compat-pedantic")
+  #if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wc++11-long-long")
+    #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_CPP98_COMPAT_PEDANTIC_ \
+      _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wc++98-compat-pedantic\"") \
+      _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wc++11-long-long\"")
+  #else
+    #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_CPP98_COMPAT_PEDANTIC_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wc++98-compat-pedantic\"")
+  #endif
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_CPP98_COMPAT_PEDANTIC_
+#endif
+
+/* Some problem as above */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wc++11-long-long")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_CPP11_LONG_LONG_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wc++11-long-long\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_CPP11_LONG_LONG_
+#endif
+
+/* emscripten emits this whenever stdin/stdout/stderr is used in a
+ * macro. */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wdisabled-macro-expansion")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_DISABLED_MACRO_EXPANSION_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wdisabled-macro-expansion\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_DISABLED_MACRO_EXPANSION_
+#endif
+
+/* Clang uses C11 generic selections to implement some AltiVec
+ * functions, which triggers this diagnostic when not compiling
+ * in C11 mode */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wc11-extensions")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_C11_EXTENSIONS_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wc11-extensions\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_C11_EXTENSIONS_
+#endif
+
+/* Clang sometimes triggers this warning in macros in the AltiVec and
+ * NEON headers, or due to missing functions. */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wvector-conversion")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_VECTOR_CONVERSION_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wvector-conversion\"")
+  /* For NEON, the situation with -Wvector-conversion in clang < 10 is
+   * bad enough that we just disable the warning altogether. */
+  #if defined(SIMDE_ARCH_ARM) && SIMDE_DETECT_CLANG_VERSION_NOT(10,0,0)
+    #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_BUGGY_VECTOR_CONVERSION_ SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_VECTOR_CONVERSION_
+  #endif
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_VECTOR_CONVERSION_
+#endif
+#if !defined(SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_BUGGY_VECTOR_CONVERSION_)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_BUGGY_VECTOR_CONVERSION_
+#endif
+
+/* Prior to 5.0, clang didn't support disabling diagnostics in
+ * statement exprs.  As a result, some macros we use don't
+ * properly silence warnings. */
+#if SIMDE_DETECT_CLANG_VERSION_NOT(5,0,0) && HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wcast-qual") && HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wcast-align")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_BUGGY_CASTS_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wcast-qual\"") _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wcast-align\"")
+#elif SIMDE_DETECT_CLANG_VERSION_NOT(5,0,0) && HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wcast-qual")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_BUGGY_CASTS_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wcast-qual\"")
+#elif SIMDE_DETECT_CLANG_VERSION_NOT(5,0,0) && HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wcast-align")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_BUGGY_CASTS_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wcast-align\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_BUGGY_CASTS_
+#endif
+
+/* SLEEF triggers this a *lot* in their headers */
+#if HEDLEY_HAS_WARNING("-Wignored-qualifiers")
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_IGNORED_QUALIFIERS_ _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Wignored-qualifiers\"")
+#elif HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(4,3,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_IGNORED_QUALIFIERS_ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wignored-qualifiers\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_IGNORED_QUALIFIERS_
+#endif
+
+/* GCC emits this under some circumstances when using __int128 */
+#if HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(4,8,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PEDANTIC_ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wpedantic\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PEDANTIC_
+#endif
+
+/* MSVC doesn't like (__assume(0), code) and will warn about code being
+ * unreachable, but we want it there because not all compilers
+ * understand the unreachable macro and will complain if it is missing.
+ * I'm planning on adding a new macro to Hedley to handle this a bit
+ * more elegantly, but until then... */
+#if defined(HEDLEY_MSVC_VERSION)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNREACHABLE_ __pragma(warning(disable:4702))
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNREACHABLE_
+#endif
+
+/* This is a false positive from GCC in a few places. */
+#if HEDLEY_GCC_VERSION_CHECK(4,7,0)
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_MAYBE_UNINITIAZILED_ _Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wmaybe-uninitialized\"")
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_MAYBE_UNINITIAZILED_
+#endif
+
+#if defined(SIMDE_ENABLE_NATIVE_ALIASES)
+  #define SIMDE_DISABLE_UNWANTED_DIAGNOSTICS_NATIVE_ALIASES_ \
+    SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_RESERVED_ID_MACRO_
+#else
+  #define SIMDE_DISABLE_UNWANTED_DIAGNOSTICS_NATIVE_ALIASES_
+#endif
+
+#define SIMDE_DISABLE_UNWANTED_DIAGNOSTICS \
+  SIMDE_DISABLE_UNWANTED_DIAGNOSTICS_NATIVE_ALIASES_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PSABI_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_NO_EMMS_INSTRUCTION_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_SIMD_PRAGMA_DEPRECATED_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_CONDITIONAL_UNINITIALIZED_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_FLOAT_EQUAL_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_NON_CONSTANT_AGGREGATE_INITIALIZER_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_EXTRA_SEMI_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_VLA_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_USED_BUT_MARKED_UNUSED_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_UNUSED_FUNCTION_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_PASS_FAILED_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_CPP98_COMPAT_PEDANTIC_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_CPP11_LONG_LONG_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_BUGGY_UNUSED_BUT_SET_VARIBALE_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_BUGGY_CASTS_ \
+  SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_DISABLE_BUGGY_VECTOR_CONVERSION_
+
+#endif /* !defined(SIMDE_DIAGNOSTIC_H) */