code-ai-installer 3.0.0 → 4.0.1-a

package/domains/analytics/locales/en/.agents/workflows/quick-insight.md

@@ -1,282 +1,282 @@
----
-name: quick-insight
-description: Quick analytical pipeline — 1 session, one team, logic mediation, PDF report
----
-
-# Workflow: /quick-insight — Quick Analytical Pipeline (1 session)
-
-## Description
-A simplified, rapid analytical pipeline contained within a single session. One single Analysts team (no Critics); the Mediator verifies logical chaining, and the designers layout a PDF report. Designed for simple, direct questions and quick checks.
-
-> **Pipeline rules:** This workflow adheres to `analytics-pipeline-rules.md` — all 7 rules, mandatory checks, and the escalation protocol apply strictly, identical to /analyze.
-
-## When to use
-
-| Criterion | /quick-insight (Quick) | /analyze (Full) |
-|-----------|:----------------------:|:---------------:|
-| Complexity of the question | Low: single framework, fast check | High: multifactorial, strategic |
-| Stakes | Low: internal report, exploration | High: investments, market entries |
-| Devil's advocate needed? | No | Yes |
-| PDF report | Yes (simplified) | Yes (comprehensive with Appendix A-D) |
-| Time budget | 1 session (30-60 min) | 5 sessions (2-4 hours) |
-| Preliminary check | ✅ Proving a hypothesis before full /analyze | |
-
-## When NOT to use
-- A complex strategic question with high stakes → `/analyze`.
-- Necessitating the cross-check of arguments by a secondary team → `/analyze`.
-- The decision impacts mission-critical business processes → `/analyze`.
-- In doubt → `/analyze` (always lean towards thoroughness).
-
-> Full Pipeline is documented in `analyze.md`.
-
-## Workflow Inputs
-
-| Field | Required | Description |
-|-------|:--------:|-------------|
-| Question / topic | ✅ | What needs to be analyzed |
-| User's data | ⬚ | Readily available data, metrics |
-| Industry / market | ⬚ | If known |
-
----
-
-## Pipeline (1 session)
-
-```
-COND-01 → INT-01 → RES-01 → AN-01 → ST-01 → MED-01 → DS-01 → LY-01
-```
-
-All 8 gates operate inside one session. Cross-session handoff files are omitted.
-
-### Parallelism
-
-| Gates | Parallel? | Reason |
-|-------|:---------:|--------|
-| COND-01 → LY-01 | ❌ Sequentially strict | Every gate requires completion of the predecessor |
-
----
-
-## Gates and deliverables
-
-### COND-01: Conductor
-**Input:** User request
-**Actions:**
-1. Ascertain the scope and explicitly confirm the `/quick-insight` mode (or suggest switching to `/analyze`).
-2. Initialize the board (`$board` — Quick Pipeline, 8 gates).
-3. Compose the task definition for the Interviewer.
-4. `$gates` → `$handoff` → INT-01.
-**Required skills:** `$board`, `$gates`, `$handoff`
-**Deliverable:** Board (Quick Pipeline) + Handoff Envelope → INT-01
-**→ Wait for "Approved"**
-
-### INT-01: Interviewer
-**Input:** `$handoff` from COND-01
-**Actions:**
-1. Formulate a short, adaptive interview (3-5 questions focusing on scope and intention).
-2. Determine: question, industry, data sources, aim, and Mediator's validation methodology.
-3. Establish a coherent Research Brief (compact format).
-4. `$gates` → `$handoff` → RES-01.
-**Required skills:** `$gates`, `$handoff`
-**Deliverable:** Research Brief (scope, central questions, data origins, assessing logic)
-**→ Wait for "Approved"**
-
-### RES-01: Researcher
-**Input:** Research Brief
-**Actions:**
-1. Garner evidence and details corresponding to the Research Brief's key questions.
-2. **Mandatory** web search (`$web-research`) — verify + augment data.
-3. Collate the findings as a Research Package (facts + links + Tier + confidence status).
-4. `$gates` → `$handoff` → AN-01.
-**Required skills:** `$web-research`, `$gates`, `$handoff`
-**Deliverable:** Research Package (data bundled with URLs, dates, authenticity levels ✅/⚠️/🔮)
-**→ Wait for "Approved"**
-
-### AN-01: Data Analyst
-**Input:** Research Package + Research Brief
-**Actions:**
-1. Select 1-3 applicable analytical frameworks (browse catalog).
-2. Expose the data package to the frameworks.
-3. Structurize findings, isolate patterns.
-4. `$gates` (dependency check: data cited correctly from RES-01) → `$handoff` → ST-01.
-**Required skills:** Elected frameworks, `$gates`, `$handoff`
-**Deliverable:** Analytical Report (compact: frameworks + observed patterns + insight deductions)
-**→ Wait for "Approved"**
-
-### ST-01: Strategist
-**Input:** Research Package + Analytical Report
-**Actions:**
-1. Melt data and analysis into cohesive structural recommendations.
-2. Form a succinct risk appraisal.
-3. Define the Action Plan (top-3 priorities furnished with targets).
-4. `$gates` (dependency check: AN-01 & RES-01 pieces of evidence properly incorporated) → `$handoff` → MED-01.
-**Required skills:** `$gates`, `$handoff`
-**Deliverable:** Strategy Report (compact: recommendations + risk factors + action map)
-**→ Wait for "Approved"**
-
-### MED-01: Mediator
-**Input:** Research Brief + Research Package + Analytical Report + Strategy Report
-**Actions:**
-1. Subject the narrative to the logical chain check-list:
-
-   | # | Check | Appraisal |
-   |---|-------|:---------:|
-   | 1 | Research data → independently corroborated via `$web-research`? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
-   | 2 | Analyst's conclusions → rigorously trace back to Research data (no leaps)? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
-   | 3 | Strategist's strategy → organically emanates from the analytics? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
-   | 4 | Frameworks utilized congruently (Quality Gates effectively passed)? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
-   | 5 | Actionable recommendations (incorporating action + indicator + schedule)? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
-   | 6 | Potential pitfalls diagnosed and counteracted? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
-   | 7 | Total absence of logical dissonances spanning the reports? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
-
-2. Deliver Conclusion:
-   - Overall grade of the analysis.
-   - Core findings (3-5 points).
-   - Unified final recommendation.
-   - Disclaimers/Limitations (exemptions forced by the swift Quick-mode profile).
-3. `$gates` → `$handoff` → DS-01.
-**Required skills:** `$gates`, `$handoff`
-**Deliverable:** Quick Conclusion (logical alignment verification + findings + propositions + constraints)
-**→ Wait for "Approved"**
-
-### DS-01: Designer
-**Input:** Quick Conclusion + Research Package + Analytical Report + Strategy Report
-**Actions:**
-1. Formulate architecture of a simplified report (`$report-design`).
-2. Elect diagrammatic logic components (decision tree via `$report-design`).
-3. Frame up a distinct palette and narrative hierarchy.
-4. Construct the executive summary wrapper.
-5. `$gates` → `$handoff` → LY-01.
-**Required skills:** `$report-design`, `$gates`, `$handoff`
-**Deliverable:** Report Design Spec (compact: structure + vis. map + color theory + executive intro)
-**→ Wait for "Approved"**
-
-### LY-01: Layouter
-**Input:** Report Design Spec + comprehensive data blocks compiled thus far
-**Actions:**
-1. Transpile into HTML bearing internal CSS (`$html-pdf-report`).
-2. Configure Chart.js logic graphs & render Mermaid schematics.
-3. Execute condensed structuring layout (Skip Appendix B — no parallel teams critique; Skip Appendix D — no Synthesis required).
-4. Run testing metrics sequence for static PDF conversion (8 queries from `$html-pdf-report`).
-5. `$gates` → Validate via internal Release Gate mechanism:
-   - [ ] All respective gate nodes state [✓] within `$board`
-   - [ ] PDF structure encompasses: Title, TOC, Exec Summary, Main Sections, Appendix A (Analyzed Metrics), Appendix B (Mediator's verification reasoning log)
-   - [ ] Embedded assertions feature verified tags (URLs affixed)
-   - [ ] Visual artifacts generate safely (animations disabled, Mermaid correctly transpiled)
-
-**Decision Node:** GO ✅ / NO-GO ❌ / GO-with-conditions ⚠️
-**Required skills:** `$html-pdf-report`, `$gates`, `$handoff`
-**Deliverable:** Standalone HTML package (Prefigured for Print-to-PDF pipeline)
-**→ Wait for "Approved"**
-
----
-
-## Reverse Handoff — loopback protocol
-
-| From Gate | Motivation | Bounce sequence | Consequence |
-|-----------|------------|-----------------|-------------|
-| AN-01 | Deficiency in primary datasets backing frameworks | RES-01 | Conduct supplementary search sweeps |
-| ST-01 | Analysis narrative misses core briefing themes | AN-01 | Incorporate additional framework lenses |
-| MED-01 | Deductive rupture detected | RES-01 or AN-01 | Location-dependent back-tracing iteration |
-| DS-01 | Void of numerically representable material | MED-01 | Enforce clearer quantitative findings |
-| LY-01 | Design blueprint missing fundamental directives | DS-01 | Retouch specifications |
-
-### Rebound Protocol
-1. Subsystem creates Reverse Handoff through `$handoff` (indicating alterations + strict immutable elements).
-2. Board tracker `$board` synchronizes states: current stage → [↩], target phase → [→].
-3. After modification — reiterate the `$gates` verification threshold.
-
-> During Quick Pipeline functionality — all return pathways are confined to the localized session sequence preventing context bleed.
-
----
-
-## Structure of the Quick PDF Report
-
-```
-Title Page
-Table of Contents
-Executive Summary
-Core Section (Mediator's Conclusion Output)
-  ├─ Critical Findings (3-5 points)
-  ├─ Quantitative Visualizations
-  ├─ Strategy Output + Functional Roadmaps
-  └─ Inherent Constraints stemming from Quick-mode deployment
-Appendix A — Operational Data Logs (Research + Diagnostics + Plan)
-Appendix B — Neutral Verification Protocol (Checklists + Argumentation Log)
-Appendix C — Bibliography & Provenance (URL origins, Datestamp, Fidelity Index)
-```
-
-> **Absent elements:** Team Critic Appendix (owing to 1 team topology) alongside Final Synthesis comparisons.
-
----
-
-## Accessible Analytical Frameworks Compendium (For AN-01 Application)
-
-| Methodology | Respective Skill | Situational Match |
-|-------------|------------------|-------------------|
-| SWOT | `$swot-analysis` | Assessing broad strategic posturing |
-| TAM/SAM/SOM | `$tam-sam-som` | Quantifying market saturation possibilities |
-| Competitive Analysis | `$competitive-analysis` | Diagnosing adversary layouts / market heat map |
-| PEST/PESTEL | `$pest-analysis` | Interpreting macroscopic shifting pressures |
-| Porter's 5 Forces | `$porters-five-forces` | Checking sector stability & allure |
-| BCG Matrix | `$bcg-matrix` | Categorizing internal operations / offerings |
-| Ansoff Matrix | `$ansoff-matrix` | Graphing paths for corporate scaling |
-| Blue Ocean | `$blue-ocean-strategy` | Inventing uncontested zones |
-| Value Chain | `$value-chain-analysis` | Identifying operational value leaks / enhancements |
-| Cohort Analysis | `$cohort-analysis` | Observing retention lifespan grouped parameters |
-| RFM Analysis | `$rfm-analysis` | Calibrating buyer segmentation groups |
-| Unit Economics | `$unit-economics` | Analyzing atomic margin yields, CAC versus LTV |
-| Trend Analysis | `$trend-analysis` | Chronological extrapolation mapping |
-| Customer Journey | `$customer-journey-mapping` | Decoding step-by-step UX pain points |
-| ICP / Buyer Persona | `$icp-buyer-persona` | Distilling archetypal user characteristics |
-| JTBD | `$jtbd-analysis` | Discovering core objective motives |
-
-**Defining Rule regarding Quick Pipeline operation:** Deployment confined to 1-3 analytical structures per launch (as opposed to minimum 2 frameworks mapped within the Full pipeline).
-
----
-
-## Example — Quick Pipeline mid-flight (AN-01 operations engaged)
-
-```
-📊 Process Rate: 38% (3/8) | Avg transit timing: 6 mins | Active Blockages: 0 | Backtracks: 0
-
-| # | ID | Gate phase | Integrity Status | Deliverable Output |
-|---|----|------------|:----------------:|--------------------|
-| 1 | COND-01 | Conductor System | [✓] | Quick Pipeline, Parameter scope: Unit Economics targeted start-up metrics |
-| 2 | INT-01 | Extraction Logic | [✓] | Prompt Summary: 5 interrogations, target: B2B SaaS, baseline: $500K ARR rate |
-| 3 | RES-01 | Sourcing Extractor| [✓] | Discovered 18 origins, Authenticity confirmed roughly at 68% 🟡 |
-| 4 | AN-01 | Data Analytics | [→] | Currently synthesizing: unit-economics calculations nested against competitive-analysis overlays |
-| 5 | ST-01 | Strategic Director | [ ] | — |
-| 6 | MED-01 | Adjudicator | [ ] | — |
-| 7 | DS-01 | Design Orchestrator| [ ] | — |
-| 8 | LY-01 | Assembly + RG Gate | [ ] | — |
-```
-
----
-
-## Divergence Key: Quick configuration against Full configuration properties
-
-| Parameter Characteristic | Configuration: Quick (`/quick-insight`) | Configuration: Full (`/analyze`) |
-|--------------------------|:---------------------------------------:|:--------------------------------:|
-| Phase Sessions allocated | 1 | 5 |
-| Individual Gate Checks | 8 | 15 |
-| Assembled Analytical Nodes | 1 single-vector alignment (Alpha variant) | 2 oppositional segments (Alpha versus Beta forces) |
-| Active Bridge Inter-session links | None required | Hard requirement (session-N-handoff sequence) |
-| Active Logic modules requested | Limits bounding at 1-3 | Absolute floor requirement of at least 2 models requested |
-| Adjudication Directives | Rigid tracing analysis spanning chronological outputs | Direct adversarial contrasting evaluation (A v B output mapping) |
-| Attached Appendix elements | Index A (Analyzed), Index B (Tracing details), Index C (Origin Citations) | Appendix A-B matching node reports, C Mediator logs, + synthesized D |
-| `$session-prompt-generator` usage | Unnecessary payload weight | Critical path dependency requiring payload transition |
-| Scope-creep protocols | Trigger response to escalate → re-route mapping → /analyze parameter | — |
-
-> **Scope-creep rule parameter behavior:** If an analysis vector reveals deeper necessary inquiries than predicted within Quick Pipeline parameters (requiring oppositional review checks, multiple modeling tests simultaneously executing due to stake elevation requirements) — systemic rules dictate Conductor to recommend overriding parameters towards sequence implementation corresponding strictly parallel with /analyze mechanics. Authorized manual user verification operates final toggle sequence parameter.
-
----
-
-## Starting prompt initiation framework
-
-```
-Quick inquiry brief: [insert analytical focal question].
-
-Acquired data pool: [if presently available insert here]
-Associated industry parameter: [insert field here if strictly relevant]
-
-Commence subroutine /quick-insight.
-```
+---
+name: quick-insight
+description: Quick analytical pipeline — 1 session, one team, logic mediation, PDF report
+---
+
+# Workflow: /quick-insight — Quick Analytical Pipeline (1 session)
+
+## Description
+A simplified, rapid analytical pipeline contained within a single session. One single Analysts team (no Critics); the Mediator verifies logical chaining, and the designers layout a PDF report. Designed for simple, direct questions and quick checks.
+
+> **Pipeline rules:** This workflow adheres to `analytics-pipeline-rules.md` — all 7 rules, mandatory checks, and the escalation protocol apply strictly, identical to /analyze.
+
+## When to use
+
+| Criterion | /quick-insight (Quick) | /analyze (Full) |
+|-----------|:----------------------:|:---------------:|
+| Complexity of the question | Low: single framework, fast check | High: multifactorial, strategic |
+| Stakes | Low: internal report, exploration | High: investments, market entries |
+| Devil's advocate needed? | No | Yes |
+| PDF report | Yes (simplified) | Yes (comprehensive with Appendix A-D) |
+| Time budget | 1 session (30-60 min) | 5 sessions (2-4 hours) |
+| Preliminary check | ✅ Proving a hypothesis before full /analyze | |
+
+## When NOT to use
+- A complex strategic question with high stakes → `/analyze`.
+- Necessitating the cross-check of arguments by a secondary team → `/analyze`.
+- The decision impacts mission-critical business processes → `/analyze`.
+- In doubt → `/analyze` (always lean towards thoroughness).
+
+> Full Pipeline is documented in `analyze.md`.
+
+## Workflow Inputs
+
+| Field | Required | Description |
+|-------|:--------:|-------------|
+| Question / topic | ✅ | What needs to be analyzed |
+| User's data | ⬚ | Readily available data, metrics |
+| Industry / market | ⬚ | If known |
+
+---
+
+## Pipeline (1 session)
+
+```
+COND-01 → INT-01 → RES-01 → AN-01 → ST-01 → MED-01 → DS-01 → LY-01
+```
+
+All 8 gates operate inside one session. Cross-session handoff files are omitted.
+
+### Parallelism
+
+| Gates | Parallel? | Reason |
+|-------|:---------:|--------|
+| COND-01 → LY-01 | ❌ Sequentially strict | Every gate requires completion of the predecessor |
+
+---
+
+## Gates and deliverables
+
+### COND-01: Conductor
+**Input:** User request
+**Actions:**
+1. Ascertain the scope and explicitly confirm the `/quick-insight` mode (or suggest switching to `/analyze`).
+2. Initialize the board (`$board` — Quick Pipeline, 8 gates).
+3. Compose the task definition for the Interviewer.
+4. `$gates` → `$handoff` → INT-01.
+**Required skills:** `$board`, `$gates`, `$handoff`
+**Deliverable:** Board (Quick Pipeline) + Handoff Envelope → INT-01
+**→ Wait for "Approved"**
+
+### INT-01: Interviewer
+**Input:** `$handoff` from COND-01
+**Actions:**
+1. Formulate a short, adaptive interview (3-5 questions focusing on scope and intention).
+2. Determine: question, industry, data sources, aim, and Mediator's validation methodology.
+3. Establish a coherent Research Brief (compact format).
+4. `$gates` → `$handoff` → RES-01.
+**Required skills:** `$gates`, `$handoff`
+**Deliverable:** Research Brief (scope, central questions, data origins, assessing logic)
+**→ Wait for "Approved"**
+
+### RES-01: Researcher
+**Input:** Research Brief
+**Actions:**
+1. Garner evidence and details corresponding to the Research Brief's key questions.
+2. **Mandatory** web search (`$web-research`) — verify + augment data.
+3. Collate the findings as a Research Package (facts + links + Tier + confidence status).
+4. `$gates` → `$handoff` → AN-01.
+**Required skills:** `$web-research`, `$gates`, `$handoff`
+**Deliverable:** Research Package (data bundled with URLs, dates, authenticity levels ✅/⚠️/🔮)
+**→ Wait for "Approved"**
+
+### AN-01: Data Analyst
+**Input:** Research Package + Research Brief
+**Actions:**
+1. Select 1-3 applicable analytical frameworks (browse catalog).
+2. Expose the data package to the frameworks.
+3. Structurize findings, isolate patterns.
+4. `$gates` (dependency check: data cited correctly from RES-01) → `$handoff` → ST-01.
+**Required skills:** Elected frameworks, `$gates`, `$handoff`
+**Deliverable:** Analytical Report (compact: frameworks + observed patterns + insight deductions)
+**→ Wait for "Approved"**
+
+### ST-01: Strategist
+**Input:** Research Package + Analytical Report
+**Actions:**
+1. Melt data and analysis into cohesive structural recommendations.
+2. Form a succinct risk appraisal.
+3. Define the Action Plan (top-3 priorities furnished with targets).
+4. `$gates` (dependency check: AN-01 & RES-01 pieces of evidence properly incorporated) → `$handoff` → MED-01.
+**Required skills:** `$gates`, `$handoff`
+**Deliverable:** Strategy Report (compact: recommendations + risk factors + action map)
+**→ Wait for "Approved"**
+
+### MED-01: Mediator
+**Input:** Research Brief + Research Package + Analytical Report + Strategy Report
+**Actions:**
+1. Subject the narrative to the logical chain check-list:
+
+   | # | Check | Appraisal |
+   |---|-------|:---------:|
+   | 1 | Research data → independently corroborated via `$web-research`? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
+   | 2 | Analyst's conclusions → rigorously trace back to Research data (no leaps)? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
+   | 3 | Strategist's strategy → organically emanates from the analytics? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
+   | 4 | Frameworks utilized congruently (Quality Gates effectively passed)? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
+   | 5 | Actionable recommendations (incorporating action + indicator + schedule)? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
+   | 6 | Potential pitfalls diagnosed and counteracted? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
+   | 7 | Total absence of logical dissonances spanning the reports? | ✅ / ⚠️ / ❌ |
+
+2. Deliver Conclusion:
+   - Overall grade of the analysis.
+   - Core findings (3-5 points).
+   - Unified final recommendation.
+   - Disclaimers/Limitations (exemptions forced by the swift Quick-mode profile).
+3. `$gates` → `$handoff` → DS-01.
+**Required skills:** `$gates`, `$handoff`
+**Deliverable:** Quick Conclusion (logical alignment verification + findings + propositions + constraints)
+**→ Wait for "Approved"**
+
+### DS-01: Designer
+**Input:** Quick Conclusion + Research Package + Analytical Report + Strategy Report
+**Actions:**
+1. Formulate architecture of a simplified report (`$report-design`).
+2. Elect diagrammatic logic components (decision tree via `$report-design`).
+3. Frame up a distinct palette and narrative hierarchy.
+4. Construct the executive summary wrapper.
+5. `$gates` → `$handoff` → LY-01.
+**Required skills:** `$report-design`, `$gates`, `$handoff`
+**Deliverable:** Report Design Spec (compact: structure + vis. map + color theory + executive intro)
+**→ Wait for "Approved"**
+
+### LY-01: Layouter
+**Input:** Report Design Spec + comprehensive data blocks compiled thus far
+**Actions:**
+1. Transpile into HTML bearing internal CSS (`$html-pdf-report`).
+2. Configure Chart.js logic graphs & render Mermaid schematics.
+3. Execute condensed structuring layout (Skip Appendix B — no parallel teams critique; Skip Appendix D — no Synthesis required).
+4. Run testing metrics sequence for static PDF conversion (8 queries from `$html-pdf-report`).
+5. `$gates` → Validate via internal Release Gate mechanism:
+   - [ ] All respective gate nodes state [✓] within `$board`
+   - [ ] PDF structure encompasses: Title, TOC, Exec Summary, Main Sections, Appendix A (Analyzed Metrics), Appendix B (Mediator's verification reasoning log)
+   - [ ] Embedded assertions feature verified tags (URLs affixed)
+   - [ ] Visual artifacts generate safely (animations disabled, Mermaid correctly transpiled)
+
+**Decision Node:** GO ✅ / NO-GO ❌ / GO-with-conditions ⚠️
+**Required skills:** `$html-pdf-report`, `$gates`, `$handoff`
+**Deliverable:** Standalone HTML package (Prefigured for Print-to-PDF pipeline)
+**→ Wait for "Approved"**
+
+---
+
+## Reverse Handoff — loopback protocol
+
+| From Gate | Motivation | Bounce sequence | Consequence |
+|-----------|------------|-----------------|-------------|
+| AN-01 | Deficiency in primary datasets backing frameworks | RES-01 | Conduct supplementary search sweeps |
+| ST-01 | Analysis narrative misses core briefing themes | AN-01 | Incorporate additional framework lenses |
+| MED-01 | Deductive rupture detected | RES-01 or AN-01 | Location-dependent back-tracing iteration |
+| DS-01 | Void of numerically representable material | MED-01 | Enforce clearer quantitative findings |
+| LY-01 | Design blueprint missing fundamental directives | DS-01 | Retouch specifications |
+
+### Rebound Protocol
+1. Subsystem creates Reverse Handoff through `$handoff` (indicating alterations + strict immutable elements).
+2. Board tracker `$board` synchronizes states: current stage → [↩], target phase → [→].
+3. After modification — reiterate the `$gates` verification threshold.
+
+> During Quick Pipeline functionality — all return pathways are confined to the localized session sequence preventing context bleed.
+
+---
+
+## Structure of the Quick PDF Report
+
+```
+Title Page
+Table of Contents
+Executive Summary
+Core Section (Mediator's Conclusion Output)
+  ├─ Critical Findings (3-5 points)
+  ├─ Quantitative Visualizations
+  ├─ Strategy Output + Functional Roadmaps
+  └─ Inherent Constraints stemming from Quick-mode deployment
+Appendix A — Operational Data Logs (Research + Diagnostics + Plan)
+Appendix B — Neutral Verification Protocol (Checklists + Argumentation Log)
+Appendix C — Bibliography & Provenance (URL origins, Datestamp, Fidelity Index)
+```
+
+> **Absent elements:** Team Critic Appendix (owing to 1 team topology) alongside Final Synthesis comparisons.
+
+---
+
+## Accessible Analytical Frameworks Compendium (For AN-01 Application)
+
+| Methodology | Respective Skill | Situational Match |
+|-------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| SWOT | `$swot-analysis` | Assessing broad strategic posturing |
+| TAM/SAM/SOM | `$tam-sam-som` | Quantifying market saturation possibilities |
+| Competitive Analysis | `$competitive-analysis` | Diagnosing adversary layouts / market heat map |
+| PEST/PESTEL | `$pest-analysis` | Interpreting macroscopic shifting pressures |
+| Porter's 5 Forces | `$porters-five-forces` | Checking sector stability & allure |
+| BCG Matrix | `$bcg-matrix` | Categorizing internal operations / offerings |
+| Ansoff Matrix | `$ansoff-matrix` | Graphing paths for corporate scaling |
+| Blue Ocean | `$blue-ocean-strategy` | Inventing uncontested zones |
+| Value Chain | `$value-chain-analysis` | Identifying operational value leaks / enhancements |
+| Cohort Analysis | `$cohort-analysis` | Observing retention lifespan grouped parameters |
+| RFM Analysis | `$rfm-analysis` | Calibrating buyer segmentation groups |
+| Unit Economics | `$unit-economics` | Analyzing atomic margin yields, CAC versus LTV |
+| Trend Analysis | `$trend-analysis` | Chronological extrapolation mapping |
+| Customer Journey | `$customer-journey-mapping` | Decoding step-by-step UX pain points |
+| ICP / Buyer Persona | `$icp-buyer-persona` | Distilling archetypal user characteristics |
+| JTBD | `$jtbd-analysis` | Discovering core objective motives |
+
+**Defining Rule regarding Quick Pipeline operation:** Deployment confined to 1-3 analytical structures per launch (as opposed to minimum 2 frameworks mapped within the Full pipeline).
+
+---
+
+## Example — Quick Pipeline mid-flight (AN-01 operations engaged)
+
+```
+📊 Process Rate: 38% (3/8) | Avg transit timing: 6 mins | Active Blockages: 0 | Backtracks: 0
+
+| # | ID | Gate phase | Integrity Status | Deliverable Output |
+|---|----|------------|:----------------:|--------------------|
+| 1 | COND-01 | Conductor System | [✓] | Quick Pipeline, Parameter scope: Unit Economics targeted start-up metrics |
+| 2 | INT-01 | Extraction Logic | [✓] | Prompt Summary: 5 interrogations, target: B2B SaaS, baseline: $500K ARR rate |
+| 3 | RES-01 | Sourcing Extractor| [✓] | Discovered 18 origins, Authenticity confirmed roughly at 68% 🟡 |
+| 4 | AN-01 | Data Analytics | [→] | Currently synthesizing: unit-economics calculations nested against competitive-analysis overlays |
+| 5 | ST-01 | Strategic Director | [ ] | — |
+| 6 | MED-01 | Adjudicator | [ ] | — |
+| 7 | DS-01 | Design Orchestrator| [ ] | — |
+| 8 | LY-01 | Assembly + RG Gate | [ ] | — |
+```
+
+---
+
+## Divergence Key: Quick configuration against Full configuration properties
+
+| Parameter Characteristic | Configuration: Quick (`/quick-insight`) | Configuration: Full (`/analyze`) |
+|--------------------------|:---------------------------------------:|:--------------------------------:|
+| Phase Sessions allocated | 1 | 5 |
+| Individual Gate Checks | 8 | 15 |
+| Assembled Analytical Nodes | 1 single-vector alignment (Alpha variant) | 2 oppositional segments (Alpha versus Beta forces) |
+| Active Bridge Inter-session links | None required | Hard requirement (session-N-handoff sequence) |
+| Active Logic modules requested | Limits bounding at 1-3 | Absolute floor requirement of at least 2 models requested |
+| Adjudication Directives | Rigid tracing analysis spanning chronological outputs | Direct adversarial contrasting evaluation (A v B output mapping) |
+| Attached Appendix elements | Index A (Analyzed), Index B (Tracing details), Index C (Origin Citations) | Appendix A-B matching node reports, C Mediator logs, + synthesized D |
+| `$session-prompt-generator` usage | Unnecessary payload weight | Critical path dependency requiring payload transition |
+| Scope-creep protocols | Trigger response to escalate → re-route mapping → /analyze parameter | — |
+
+> **Scope-creep rule parameter behavior:** If an analysis vector reveals deeper necessary inquiries than predicted within Quick Pipeline parameters (requiring oppositional review checks, multiple modeling tests simultaneously executing due to stake elevation requirements) — systemic rules dictate Conductor to recommend overriding parameters towards sequence implementation corresponding strictly parallel with /analyze mechanics. Authorized manual user verification operates final toggle sequence parameter.
+
+---
+
+## Starting prompt initiation framework
+
+```
+Quick inquiry brief: [insert analytical focal question].
+
+Acquired data pool: [if presently available insert here]
+Associated industry parameter: [insert field here if strictly relevant]
+
+Commence subroutine /quick-insight.
+```