ceedling 0.29.1 → 0.30.0

data/vendor/cmock/vendor/c_exception/vendor/unity/docs/UnityHelperScriptsGuide.md

@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+# Unity Helper Scripts
+
+## With a Little Help From Our Friends
+
+Sometimes what it takes to be a really efficient C programmer is a little non-C.
+The Unity project includes a couple Ruby scripts for making your life just a tad
+easier. They are completely optional. If you choose to use them, you'll need a
+copy of Ruby, of course. Just install whatever the latest version is, and it is
+likely to work. You can find Ruby at [ruby-lang.org](https://ruby-labg.org/).
+
+
+### `generate_test_runner.rb`
+
+Are you tired of creating your own `main` function in your test file? Do you
+keep forgetting to add a `RUN_TEST` call when you add a new test case to your
+suite? Do you want to use CMock or other fancy add-ons but don't want to figure
+out how to create your own `RUN_TEST` macro?
+
+Well then we have the perfect script for you!
+
+The `generate_test_runner` script processes a given test file and automatically
+creates a separate test runner file that includes ?main?to execute the test
+cases within the scanned test file. All you do then is add the generated runner
+to your list of files to be compiled and linked, and presto you're done!
+
+This script searches your test file for void function signatures having a
+function name beginning with "test" or "spec". It treats each of these
+functions as a test case and builds up a test suite of them. For example, the
+following includes three test cases:
+
+```C
+void testVerifyThatUnityIsAwesomeAndWillMakeYourLifeEasier(void)
+{
+  ASSERT_TRUE(1);
+}
+void test_FunctionName_should_WorkProperlyAndReturn8(void) {
+  ASSERT_EQUAL_INT(8, FunctionName());
+}
+void spec_Function_should_DoWhatItIsSupposedToDo(void) {
+  ASSERT_NOT_NULL(Function(5));
+}
+```
+
+You can run this script a couple of ways. The first is from the command line:
+
+```Shell
+ruby generate_test_runner.rb TestFile.c NameOfRunner.c
+```
+
+Alternatively, if you include only the test file parameter, the script will copy
+the name of the test file and automatically append "_Runner" to the name of the
+generated file. The example immediately below will create TestFile_Runner.c.
+
+```Shell
+ruby generate_test_runner.rb TestFile.c
+```
+
+You can also add a [YAML](http://www.yaml.org/) file to configure extra options.
+Conveniently, this YAML file is of the same format as that used by Unity and
+CMock. So if you are using YAML files already, you can simply pass the very same
+file into the generator script.
+
+```Shell
+ruby generate_test_runner.rb TestFile.c my_config.yml
+```
+
+The contents of the YAML file `my_config.yml` could look something like the
+example below. If you're wondering what some of these options do, you're going
+to love the next section of this document.
+
+```YAML
+:unity:
+  :includes:
+    - stdio.h
+    - microdefs.h
+  :cexception: 1
+  :suit_setup: "blah = malloc(1024);"
+  :suite_teardown: "free(blah);"
+```
+
+If you would like to force your generated test runner to include one or more
+header files, you can just include those at the command line too. Just make sure
+these are _after_ the YAML file, if you are using one:
+
+```Shell
+ruby generate_test_runner.rb TestFile.c my_config.yml extras.h
+```
+
+Another option, particularly if you are already using Ruby to orchestrate your
+builds - or more likely the Ruby-based build tool Rake - is requiring this
+script directly. Anything that you would have specified in a YAML file can be
+passed to the script as part of a hash. Let's push the exact same requirement
+set as we did above but this time through Ruby code directly:
+
+```Ruby
+require "generate_test_runner.rb"
+options = {
+  :includes => ["stdio.h", "microdefs.h"],
+  :cexception => 1,
+  :suite_setup => "blah = malloc(1024);",
+  :suite_teardown => "free(blah);"
+}
+UnityTestRunnerGenerator.new.run(testfile, runner_name, options)
+```
+
+If you have multiple files to generate in a build script (such as a Rakefile),
+you might want to instantiate a generator object with your options and call it
+to generate each runner thereafter. Like thus:
+
+```Ruby
+gen = UnityTestRunnerGenerator.new(options)
+test_files.each do |f|
+  gen.run(f, File.basename(f,'.c')+"Runner.c"
+end
+```
+
+#### Options accepted by generate_test_runner.rb:
+
+The following options are available when executing `generate_test_runner`. You
+may pass these as a Ruby hash directly or specify them in a YAML file, both of
+which are described above. In the `examples` directory, Example 3's Rakefile
+demonstrates using a Ruby hash.
+
+
+##### `:includes`
+
+This option specifies an array of file names to be ?#include?'d at the top of
+your runner C file. You might use it to reference custom types or anything else
+universally needed in your generated runners.
+
+
+##### `:suite_setup`
+
+Define this option with C code to be executed _before any_ test cases are run.
+
+
+##### `:suite_teardown`
+
+Define this option with C code to be executed ?after all?test cases have
+finished.
+
+
+##### `:enforce_strict_ordering`
+
+This option should be defined if you have the strict order feature enabled in
+CMock (see CMock documentation). This generates extra variables required for
+everything to run smoothly. If you provide the same YAML to the generator as
+used in CMock's configuration, you've already configured the generator properly.
+
+
+##### `:plugins`
+
+This option specifies an array of plugins to be used (of course, the array can
+contain only a single plugin). This is your opportunity to enable support for
+CException support, which will add a check for unhandled exceptions in each
+test, reporting a failure if one is detected. To enable this feature using Ruby:
+
+```Ruby
+:plugins => [ :cexception ]
+```
+
+Or as a yaml file:
+
+```YAML
+:plugins:
+  -:cexception
+```
+
+If you are using CMock, it is very likely that you are already passing an array
+of plugins to CMock. You can just use the same array here. This script will just
+ignore the plugins that don't require additional support.
+
+
+### `unity_test_summary.rb`
+
+A Unity test file contains one or more test case functions. Each test case can
+pass, fail, or be ignored. Each test file is run individually producing results
+for its collection of test cases. A given project will almost certainly be
+composed of multiple test files. Therefore, the suite of tests is comprised of
+one or more test cases spread across one or more test files. This script
+aggregates individual test file results to generate a summary of all executed
+test cases. The output includes how many tests were run, how many were ignored,
+and how many failed. In addition, the output includes a listing of which
+specific tests were ignored and failed. A good example of the breadth and
+details of these results can be found in the `examples` directory. Intentionally
+ignored and failing tests in this project generate corresponding entries in the
+summary report.
+
+If you're interested in other (prettier?) output formats, check into the
+Ceedling build tool project (ceedling.sourceforge.net) that works with Unity and
+CMock and supports xunit-style xml as well as other goodies.
+
+This script assumes the existence of files ending with the extensions
+`.testpass` and `.testfail`.The contents of these files includes the test
+results summary corresponding to each test file executed with the extension set
+according to the presence or absence of failures for that test file. The script
+searches a specified path for these files, opens each one it finds, parses the
+results, and aggregates and prints a summary. Calling it from the command line
+looks like this:
+
+```Shell
+ruby unity_test_summary.rb build/test/
+```
+
+You can optionally specify a root path as well. This is really helpful when you
+are using relative paths in your tools' setup, but you want to pull the summary
+into an IDE like Eclipse for clickable shortcuts.
+
+```Shell
+ruby unity_test_summary.rb build/test/ ~/projects/myproject/
+```
+
+Or, if you're more of a Windows sort of person:
+
+```Shell
+ruby unity_test_summary.rb build\teat\ C:\projects\myproject\
+```
+
+When configured correctly, you'll see a final summary, like so:
+
+```Shell
+--------------------------
+UNITY IGNORED TEST SUMMARY
+--------------------------
+blah.c:22:test_sandwiches_should_HaveBreadOnTwoSides:IGNORE
+
+-------------------------
+UNITY FAILED TEST SUMMARY
+-------------------------
+blah.c:87:test_sandwiches_should_HaveCondiments:FAIL:Expected 1 was 0
+meh.c:38:test_soda_should_BeCalledPop:FAIL:Expected "pop" was "coke"
+
+--------------------------
+OVERALL UNITY TEST SUMMARY
+--------------------------
+45 TOTAL TESTS 2 TOTAL FAILURES 1 IGNORED
+```
+
+How convenient is that?
+
+
+*Find The Latest of This And More at [ThrowTheSwitch.org](https://throwtheswitch.org)*

data/vendor/cmock/vendor/c_exception/vendor/unity/docs/license.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+The MIT License (MIT)
+
+Copyright (c) <year> 2007-14 Mike Karlesky, Mark VanderVoord, Greg Williams
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
+all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
+THE SOFTWARE.

data/vendor/cmock/vendor/c_exception/vendor/unity/examples/example_1/makefile

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+# ==========================================
+#   Unity Project - A Test Framework for C
+#   Copyright (c) 2007 Mike Karlesky, Mark VanderVoord, Greg Williams
+#   [Released under MIT License. Please refer to license.txt for details]
+# ==========================================
+
+#We try to detect the OS we are running on, and adjust commands as needed
+ifeq ($(OS),Windows_NT)
+  ifeq ($(shell uname -s),) # not in a bash-like shell
+	CLEANUP = del /F /Q
+	MKDIR = mkdir
+  else # in a bash-like shell, like msys
+	CLEANUP = rm -f
+	MKDIR = mkdir -p
+  endif
+	TARGET_EXTENSION=.exe
+else
+	CLEANUP = rm -f
+	MKDIR = mkdir -p
+	TARGET_EXTENSION=.out
+endif
+
+C_COMPILER=gcc
+ifeq ($(shell uname -s), Darwin)
+C_COMPILER=clang
+endif
+
+UNITY_ROOT=../..
+
+CFLAGS=-std=c89
+CFLAGS += -Wall
+CFLAGS += -Wextra
+CFLAGS += -Wpointer-arith
+CFLAGS += -Wcast-align
+CFLAGS += -Wwrite-strings
+CFLAGS += -Wswitch-default
+CFLAGS += -Wunreachable-code
+CFLAGS += -Winit-self
+CFLAGS += -Wmissing-field-initializers
+CFLAGS += -Wno-unknown-pragmas
+CFLAGS += -Wstrict-prototypes
+CFLAGS += -Wundef
+CFLAGS += -Wold-style-definition
+
+TARGET_BASE1=test1
+TARGET_BASE2=test2
+TARGET1 = $(TARGET_BASE1)$(TARGET_EXTENSION)
+TARGET2 = $(TARGET_BASE2)$(TARGET_EXTENSION)
+SRC_FILES1=$(UNITY_ROOT)/src/unity.c src/ProductionCode.c  test/TestProductionCode.c  test/test_runners/TestProductionCode_Runner.c
+SRC_FILES2=$(UNITY_ROOT)/src/unity.c src/ProductionCode2.c test/TestProductionCode2.c test/test_runners/TestProductionCode2_Runner.c
+INC_DIRS=-Isrc -I$(UNITY_ROOT)/src
+SYMBOLS=
+
+all: clean default
+
+default: $(SRC_FILES1) $(SRC_FILES2)
+	$(C_COMPILER) $(CFLAGS) $(INC_DIRS) $(SYMBOLS) $(SRC_FILES1) -o $(TARGET1)
+	$(C_COMPILER) $(CFLAGS) $(INC_DIRS) $(SYMBOLS) $(SRC_FILES2) -o $(TARGET2)
+	- ./$(TARGET1)
+	./$(TARGET2)
+
+test/test_runners/TestProductionCode_Runner.c: test/TestProductionCode.c
+	ruby $(UNITY_ROOT)/auto/generate_test_runner.rb test/TestProductionCode.c  test/test_runners/TestProductionCode_Runner.c
+test/test_runners/TestProductionCode2_Runner.c: test/TestProductionCode2.c
+	ruby $(UNITY_ROOT)/auto/generate_test_runner.rb test/TestProductionCode2.c test/test_runners/TestProductionCode2_Runner.c
+
+clean:
+	$(CLEANUP) $(TARGET1) $(TARGET2)
+
+ci: CFLAGS += -Werror
+ci: default

data/vendor/cmock/vendor/c_exception/vendor/unity/examples/example_1/readme.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+Example 1
+=========
+
+Close to the simplest possible example of Unity, using only basic features.
+Run make to build & run the example tests.

data/vendor/cmock/vendor/c_exception/vendor/unity/examples/example_1/src/ProductionCode.c

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+
+#include "ProductionCode.h"
+
+int Counter = 0;
+int NumbersToFind[9] = { 0, 34, 55, 66, 32, 11, 1, 77, 888 }; /* some obnoxious array to search that is 1-based indexing instead of 0. */
+
+/* This function is supposed to search through NumbersToFind and find a particular number.  
+ * If it finds it, the index is returned.  Otherwise 0 is returned which sorta makes sense since 
+ * NumbersToFind is indexed from 1.  Unfortunately it's broken 
+ * (and should therefore be caught by our tests) */
+int FindFunction_WhichIsBroken(int NumberToFind)
+{
+    int i = 0;
+    while (i <= 8) /* Notice I should have been in braces */
+        i++;
+        if (NumbersToFind[i] == NumberToFind) /* Yikes!  I'm getting run after the loop finishes instead of during it! */
+            return i;
+    return 0;
+}
+
+int FunctionWhichReturnsLocalVariable(void)
+{
+    return Counter;
+}

data/vendor/cmock/vendor/c_exception/vendor/unity/examples/example_1/src/ProductionCode.h

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+
+int FindFunction_WhichIsBroken(int NumberToFind);
+int FunctionWhichReturnsLocalVariable(void);

data/vendor/cmock/vendor/c_exception/vendor/unity/examples/example_1/src/ProductionCode2.c

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+
+#include "ProductionCode2.h"
+
+char* ThisFunctionHasNotBeenTested(int Poor, char* LittleFunction)
+{
+  (void)Poor;
+  (void)LittleFunction;
+  /* Since There Are No Tests Yet, This Function Could Be Empty For All We Know.
+   * Which isn't terribly useful... but at least we put in a TEST_IGNORE so we won't forget */
+  return (char*)0;
+}

data/vendor/cmock/vendor/c_exception/vendor/unity/examples/example_1/src/ProductionCode2.h

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+
+char* ThisFunctionHasNotBeenTested(int Poor, char* LittleFunction);

data/vendor/cmock/vendor/c_exception/vendor/unity/examples/example_1/test/TestProductionCode.c

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+
+#include "ProductionCode.h"
+#include "unity.h"
+
+/* sometimes you may want to get at local data in a module.
+ * for example: If you plan to pass by reference, this could be useful
+ * however, it should often be avoided */
+extern int Counter; 
+
+void setUp(void)
+{
+  /* This is run before EACH TEST */
+  Counter = 0x5a5a;
+}
+
+void tearDown(void)
+{
+}
+
+void test_FindFunction_WhichIsBroken_ShouldReturnZeroIfItemIsNotInList_WhichWorksEvenInOurBrokenCode(void)
+{
+  /* All of these should pass */
+  TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, FindFunction_WhichIsBroken(78));
+  TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, FindFunction_WhichIsBroken(1));
+  TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, FindFunction_WhichIsBroken(33));
+  TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, FindFunction_WhichIsBroken(999));
+  TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(0, FindFunction_WhichIsBroken(-1));
+}
+
+void test_FindFunction_WhichIsBroken_ShouldReturnTheIndexForItemsInList_WhichWillFailBecauseOurFunctionUnderTestIsBroken(void)
+{
+  /* You should see this line fail in your test summary */
+  TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(1, FindFunction_WhichIsBroken(34));
+  
+  /* Notice the rest of these didn't get a chance to run because the line above failed.  
+   * Unit tests abort each test function on the first sign of trouble. 
+   * Then NEXT test function runs as normal. */
+  TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(8, FindFunction_WhichIsBroken(8888));
+}
+
+void test_FunctionWhichReturnsLocalVariable_ShouldReturnTheCurrentCounterValue(void)
+{
+    /* This should be true because setUp set this up for us before this test */
+    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL_HEX(0x5a5a, FunctionWhichReturnsLocalVariable());
+    
+    /* This should be true because we can still change our answer */
+    Counter = 0x1234;
+    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL_HEX(0x1234, FunctionWhichReturnsLocalVariable());
+}
+
+void test_FunctionWhichReturnsLocalVariable_ShouldReturnTheCurrentCounterValueAgain(void)
+{
+    /* This should be true again because setup was rerun before this test (and after we changed it to 0x1234) */
+    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL_HEX(0x5a5a, FunctionWhichReturnsLocalVariable());
+}
+
+void test_FunctionWhichReturnsLocalVariable_ShouldReturnCurrentCounter_ButFailsBecauseThisTestIsActuallyFlawed(void)
+{
+    /* Sometimes you get the test wrong.  When that happens, you get a failure too... and a quick look should tell
+     * you what actually happened...which in this case was a failure to setup the initial condition. */
+    TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL_HEX(0x1234, FunctionWhichReturnsLocalVariable());
+}