tribunal-kit 9.0.0 → 9.0.2

package/.agent/skills/vector-search-pgvector/SKILL.md

@@ -1,33 +1,53 @@
 ---
 name: vector-search-pgvector
-description: Production vector database search using pgvector 0.8.0+, halfvec, sparsevec, Pinecone, Weaviate, hybrid sparse-dense retrieval, and iterative HNSW scanning.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Edit, Write
-version: 4.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-07
-script: .agent/scripts/schema_validator.js
-scripts-binding:
-  - .agent/scripts/schema_validator.js
+description: Use when Production vector database search using pgvector 0.8.0+, halfvec, sparsevec, Pinecone, Weaviate, hybrid sparse-dense retrieval, and iterative HNSW scanning.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - database-architect
   - sql-pro
   - advanced-rag-pipelines
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
+scripts-binding:
+  - .agent/scripts/schema_validator.js
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
+  - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
 ---
 
 # Vector Search & pgvector 0.8.0+ — 2026 Database Standards
 
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before creating vector tables or indexes:
-
-1. Index Type & Precision → Use `halfvec` (half-precision) for 50% RAM savings on HNSW indexes; use `sparsevec` for high-dimensional sparse vectors
-2. Iterative Index Scans (pgvector 0.8.0+) → Enable iterative scanning to prevent HNSW overfiltering when combining `WHERE` clauses with vector similarity
-3. Hybrid Search Strategy → Combine BM25 full-text search with dense vector similarity via Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF)
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `vector-search-pgvector` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
 
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
 
 ## Activation Boundaries
 
-- **Activate when:** Operating in tasks requiring Production vector database search using pgvector 0.8.0+, halfvec, sparsevec, Pinecone, Weaviate, hybrid sparse-dense retrieval, and iterative HNSW scanning..
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls strictly outside vector-search-pgvector domain or belongs to a different dedicated specialist.
+- **Activate when:** Use when Production vector database search using pgvector 0.8.0+, halfvec, sparsevec, Pinecone, Weaviate, hybrid sparse-dense retrieval, and iterative HNSW scanning.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `vector-search-pgvector` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
 
 ## High-Performance pgvector 0.8.0+ Schema (`halfvec` + HNSW)
 
@@ -80,25 +100,45 @@ LIMIT 10;
 
 ---
 
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+---
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Full Table Scan Blindspot** | Querying high-cardinality tables without index coverage | Verify query plans with EXPLAIN ANALYZE and add composite B-Tree indexes |
+| **Non-Atomic Batch Mutation** | Executing multiple related DB writes sequentially without transaction wrapper | Wrap multi-table updates in an atomic transaction with automatic rollback |
+| **Destructive Schema Migration** | Dropping or renaming columns in production without multi-phase migration | Use expand-and-contract: add new column, sync data, migrate callers, drop old |
+
+---
+
 ## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `database-architect` · `sql-pro` · `security-auditor` · `schema-validator`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Are all queries parameterized against SQL injection vulnerabilities?
+✅ Are indexes defined for all foreign keys, joins, and filtered query clauses?
+✅ Are transactions wrapped atomically with rollbacks on failure?
+✅ Are migration scripts backwards-compatible (expand-and-contract pattern)?
+✅ Did I verify column names against active schema definitions?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.md

@@ -1,19 +1,53 @@
 ---
 name: verification-before-completion
 description: Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-version: 4.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-08
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - clean-code
   - tdd-workflow
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
 scripts-binding:
   - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
   - .agent/scripts/checklist.js
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
 ---
 
 # Verification Before Completion
 
+## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
+
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `verification-before-completion` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
+
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
+
+## Activation Boundaries
+
+- **Activate when:** Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `verification-before-completion` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
 ## Overview
 
 **Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.
@@ -100,26 +134,45 @@ Skip any step = lying, not verifying
 
 ---
 
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+---
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Hallucinated Tool Capabilities** | Assuming an external library or CLI command exists without verification | Run a verification check or verify package.json before referencing tools |
+| **Premature Completion Claim** | Declaring a task finished because code was generated without verification | Execute tests, linters, or terminal commands to provide concrete proof |
+| **Context Bloat Dumping** | Pasting entire multi-thousand-line files into prompt context | Extract targeted excerpts, symbols, and signatures to preserve tokens |
+
+---
+
 ## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` · `agent-organizer` · `logic-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Premature Satisfaction:** Declaring victory before seeing fresh terminal output.
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Checklist
 ```
-✅ Did I execute the actual command rather than assuming success?
-✅ Did I read the exit code and verify 0 failures?
-✅ Did I inspect the full diff to confirm only intended changes were made?
-✅ Have I avoided all rationalizations ("should work", "looks good")?
+✅ Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
+✅ Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
+✅ Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
+✅ Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
+✅ Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
-
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/vue-expert/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: vue-expert
-description: Vue 3.5+ Composition API. Script setup, reactive refs, computed, watchers, composables, Pinia, Vue Router 4, Nuxt 4. Use when building Vue/Nuxt applications.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-version: 4.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-07
+description: Use when Vue 3.5+ Composition API. Script setup, reactive refs, computed, watchers, composables, Pinia, Vue Router 4, Nuxt 4. Use when building Vue/Nuxt applications.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - baseline-ui
   - better-ui
   - 60fps-animation
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
 scripts-binding:
   - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
   - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
@@ -15,21 +15,41 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Vue 3.5+ & Nuxt 4 — Dense Reference
 
----
-
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before writing Vue 3.5+ or Nuxt 4 components, you MUST inspect:
-
-1. Script Setup Architecture → Use `<script setup lang="ts">` exclusively; ban legacy Options API
-2. Pinia & Reactivity Rules (Section 133) → Use `storeToRefs(store)` when destructuring Pinia state to preserve reactivity
-3. Model & Watcher Syntax (Section 42) → Use `defineModel<T>()` (Vue 3.4+) and `watch(() => state.prop, ...)` for primitive watchers
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `vue-expert` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
 
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
 
 ## Activation Boundaries
 
-- **Activate when:** Operating in tasks requiring Vue 3.5+ Composition API. Script setup, reactive refs, computed, watchers, composables, Pinia, Vue Router 4, Nuxt 4. Use when building Vue/Nuxt applications..
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls strictly outside vue-expert domain or belongs to a different dedicated specialist.
+- **Activate when:** Use when Vue 3.5+ Composition API. Script setup, reactive refs, computed, watchers, composables, Pinia, Vue Router 4, Nuxt 4. Use when building Vue/Nuxt applications.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `vue-expert` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
+---
+
 
 ## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
 
@@ -270,35 +290,45 @@ const { data, error, refresh } = await useFetch(`/api/users/${id}`, {
 
 ---
 
-AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
 
-1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
-2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
-3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
-4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+---
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Uncontrolled Re-render Loop** | Mutating state inside render bodies or omitting hook dependencies | Wrap effects with explicit deps and isolate reactive derivations in useMemo |
+| **Accessibility Neglect** | Interactive <div> without role="button", tabIndex, or onKeyDown | Use semantic <button> or provide ARIA role, keyboard handlers, and focus ring |
+| **Layout Shift Flash** | Images/dynamic content without aspect-ratio or explicit dimensions | Enforce aspect-ratio or skeleton placeholders to guarantee zero CLS |
 
 ---
 
 ## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `frontend-reviewer` · `type-safety` · `ui-ux-auditor` · `complexity-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Are all component props strictly typed with zero implicit "any"?
+✅ Are responsive breakpoints, fluid typography, and optical balance verified?
+✅ Is accessibility (ARIA labels, keyboard focus, contrast) validated?
+✅ Are re-renders minimized and state lifecycles cleanly separated?
+✅ Did I verify all imported UI components and icon sets actually exist?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/vulnerability-scanner/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: vulnerability-scanner
-description: Security vulnerability analysis mastery. OWASP Top 10 (2025), injection attacks (SQL, XSS, SSRF, command), authentication/authorization flaws, dependency vulnerabilities, secret scanning, CORS misconfiguration, supply chain attacks, and security headers. Use when auditing security, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, or hardening applications.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-version: 4.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-07
+description: Use when Security vulnerability analysis mastery. OWASP Top 10 (2025), injection attacks (SQL, XSS, SSRF, command), authentication/authorization flaws, dependency vulnerabilities, secret scanning, CORS misconfiguration, supply chain attacks, and security headers. Use when auditing security, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, or hardening applications.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - backend-security-expert
   - frontend-security-expert
   - api-security-auditor
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
 scripts-binding:
   - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
   - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
@@ -15,21 +15,41 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Vulnerability Scanner — Security Analysis Mastery
 
----
-
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before scanning codebases for security vulnerabilities, you MUST inspect:
-
-1. SQL Injection Vectors (Section 39) → Ban template literal interpolation in SQL queries (`SELECT ... WHERE id = ${id}`); require parameterized queries
-2. Explicit JWT Algorithms (Section 121) → Verify `jwt.verify(token, secret, { algorithms: ["HS256"] })` specifies explicit algorithms to prevent "None" attacks
-3. SSRF Domain Allowlist (Section 87) → Validate external request URLs against a strict domain allowlist and block private IP ranges (169.254.169.254, 127.0.0.1)
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `vulnerability-scanner` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
 
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
 
 ## Activation Boundaries
 
-- **Activate when:** Operating in tasks requiring Security vulnerability analysis mastery. OWASP Top 10 (2025), injection attacks (SQL, XSS, SSRF, command), authentication/authorization flaws, dependency vulnerabilities, secret scanning, CORS misconfiguration, supply chain attacks, and security headers. Use when auditing security, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, or hardening applications..
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls strictly outside vulnerability-scanner domain or belongs to a different dedicated specialist.
+- **Activate when:** Use when Security vulnerability analysis mastery. OWASP Top 10 (2025), injection attacks (SQL, XSS, SSRF, command), authentication/authorization flaws, dependency vulnerabilities, secret scanning, CORS misconfiguration, supply chain attacks, and security headers. Use when auditing security, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, or hardening applications.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `vulnerability-scanner` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
+---
+
 
 ---
 
@@ -389,35 +409,45 @@ If a secret is committed:
 
 ---
 
-AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
 
-1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
-2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
-3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
-4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+---
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Hardcoded Secret Pattern** | Committing API keys, tokens, or private salts into source code | Load credentials strictly via runtime environment variables and secret stores |
+| **Prompt Injection Surface** | Directly concatenating untrusted user input into LLM system prompts | Wrap user content in isolated delimiters and strip injection control sequences |
+| **Missing Authorization Check** | Relying only on authentication token presence without checking tenant/object RBAC | Verify user permissions against the specific target record ID before mutation |
 
 ---
 
 ## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `security-auditor` · `penetration-tester` · `backend-security-expert`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Are user inputs sanitized and treated as untrusted at system boundaries?
+✅ Are secrets loaded strictly via environment variables with zero hardcoding?
+✅ Is least-privilege enforcement active on APIs, tokens, and storage buckets?
+✅ Are prompt-injection delimiters and sanitizers wrapped around LLM inputs?
+✅ Did I verify encryption in transit and at rest for sensitive customer data?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.