tribunal-kit 9.0.0 → 9.0.2

package/.agent/skills/swiss-design/SKILL.md

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 ---
 name: swiss-design
-description: International Typographic Style (Swiss Design) principles for web interfaces. Strict grid discipline, asymmetric layouts, bold typographic contrast, flush-left un-justified text, and mathematical negative space.
-version: 4.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-07
+description: Use when International Typographic Style (Swiss Design) principles for web interfaces. Strict grid discipline, asymmetric layouts, bold typographic contrast, flush-left un-justified text, and mathematical negative space.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - typeset
   - baseline-ui
@@ -15,23 +15,41 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Swiss Design — International Typographic Style for Web
 
----
-
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before applying Swiss Design aesthetics, you MUST inspect:
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `swiss-design` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
 
-1. `DESIGN.md` / `index.css` → Check grid system tokens and grotesque font declarations (Helvetica, Inter, Geist)
-2. Asymmetric Structural Balance (Section 32) → Align headings and content to strong left vertical axes; strictly prohibit `text-align: justify` or centered body paragraphs
-3. Mathematical Section Numbering (Section 35) → Enforce small uppercase badges (`SECTION 01 // OVERVIEW`) with `tabular-nums`
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
 
-Architect pristine, print-inspired interfaces grounded in grid discipline, objective clarity, and asymmetric typographic hierarchy.
+## Activation Boundaries
 
+- **Activate when:** Use when International Typographic Style (Swiss Design) principles for web interfaces. Strict grid discipline, asymmetric layouts, bold typographic contrast, flush-left un-justified text, and mathematical negative space.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `swiss-design` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
 
-## Activation Boundaries
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
+---
 
-- **Activate when:** Operating in tasks requiring International Typographic Style (Swiss Design) principles for web interfaces. Strict grid discipline, asymmetric layouts, bold typographic contrast, flush-left un-justified text, and mathematical negative space..
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls strictly outside swiss-design domain or belongs to a different dedicated specialist.
 
 ---
 
@@ -57,25 +75,45 @@ Architect pristine, print-inspired interfaces grounded in grid discipline, objec
 
 ---
 
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+---
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Uncontrolled Re-render Loop** | Mutating state inside render bodies or omitting hook dependencies | Wrap effects with explicit deps and isolate reactive derivations in useMemo |
+| **Accessibility Neglect** | Interactive <div> without role="button", tabIndex, or onKeyDown | Use semantic <button> or provide ARIA role, keyboard handlers, and focus ring |
+| **Layout Shift Flash** | Images/dynamic content without aspect-ratio or explicit dimensions | Enforce aspect-ratio or skeleton placeholders to guarantee zero CLS |
+
+---
+
 ## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `frontend-reviewer` · `type-safety` · `ui-ux-auditor` · `complexity-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Are all component props strictly typed with zero implicit "any"?
+✅ Are responsive breakpoints, fluid typography, and optical balance verified?
+✅ Is accessibility (ARIA labels, keyboard focus, contrast) validated?
+✅ Are re-renders minimized and state lifecycles cleanly separated?
+✅ Did I verify all imported UI components and icon sets actually exist?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/system-design-pro/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: system-design-pro
-description: Industry-level system design mastery for interviews and production. The 6-step design framework, scale estimation (DAU→QPS→storage→bandwidth), core building blocks (load balancers L4/L7, CDN, caches, queues), database selection matrix, CAP Theorem applied, and reference designs for URL shortener, rate limiter, Twitter feed, distributed cache, and notification system. Use when designing systems for scale, conducting architecture reviews, or preparing system design discussions.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-version: 4.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-07
+description: Use when Industry-level system design mastery for interviews and production. The 6-step design framework, scale estimation (DAU→QPS→storage→bandwidth), core building blocks (load balancers L4/L7, CDN, caches, queues), database selection matrix, CAP Theorem applied, and reference designs for URL shortener, rate limiter, Twitter feed, distributed cache, and notification system. Use when designing systems for scale, conducting architecture reviews, or preparing system design discussions.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - architecture
   - database-design
   - cloud-architect
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
 scripts-binding:
   - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
   - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
@@ -15,21 +15,41 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # System Design Pro — Industry-Level Mastery
 
----
-
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before designing system architecture or writing scale proposals, you MUST inspect:
-
-1. 6-Step Design Framework (Section 27) → Execute Clarify Scope, Scale Estimation, API Definition, Data Model, High-Level Design, and Deep Dive in exact order
-2. Quantified Scale Estimation (Section 65) → Calculate read/write QPS, storage growth, and bandwidth before selecting database or caching tiers
-3. Monolith First Rule (Section 17) → Start with modular monolith for $<10\text{K}$ RPM; ban introducing microservices or sharding prematurely
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `system-design-pro` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
 
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
 
 ## Activation Boundaries
 
-- **Activate when:** Operating in tasks requiring Industry-level system design mastery for interviews and production. The 6-step design framework, scale estimation (DAU→QPS→storage→bandwidth), core building blocks (load balancers L4/L7, CDN, caches, queues), database selection matrix, CAP Theorem applied, and reference designs for URL shortener, rate limiter, Twitter feed, distributed cache, and notification system. Use when designing systems for scale, conducting architecture reviews, or preparing system design discussions..
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls strictly outside system-design-pro domain or belongs to a different dedicated specialist.
+- **Activate when:** Use when Industry-level system design mastery for interviews and production. The 6-step design framework, scale estimation (DAU→QPS→storage→bandwidth), core building blocks (load balancers L4/L7, CDN, caches, queues), database selection matrix, CAP Theorem applied, and reference designs for URL shortener, rate limiter, Twitter feed, distributed cache, and notification system. Use when designing systems for scale, conducting architecture reviews, or preparing system design discussions.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `system-design-pro` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
+---
+
 
 ## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
 
@@ -329,25 +349,45 @@ Failure handling:
 
 ---
 
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
+---
+
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
+
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Hallucinated Tool Capabilities** | Assuming an external library or CLI command exists without verification | Run a verification check or verify package.json before referencing tools |
+| **Premature Completion Claim** | Declaring a task finished because code was generated without verification | Execute tests, linters, or terminal commands to provide concrete proof |
+| **Context Bloat Dumping** | Pasting entire multi-thousand-line files into prompt context | Extract targeted excerpts, symbols, and signatures to preserve tokens |
+
+---
+
 ## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` · `agent-organizer` · `logic-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
+✅ Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
+✅ Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
+✅ Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
+✅ Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md

@@ -1,35 +1,56 @@
 ---
 name: systematic-debugging
-description: Systematic debugging framework. Root-cause isolation, 4-phase methodology, hypothesis testing, log tracing, avoiding shotgun-surgery, memory allocation analysis, and empirical evidence gathering. Use when debugging complex, highly-coupled, or elusive bugs across mixed execution environments.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-version: 4.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-07
+description: Use when Systematic debugging framework. Root-cause isolation, 4-phase methodology, hypothesis testing, log tracing, avoiding shotgun-surgery, memory allocation analysis, and empirical evidence gathering. Use when debugging complex, highly-coupled, or elusive bugs across mixed execution environments.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - diagnosing-bugs
   - test-result-analyzer
   - clean-code
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
 scripts-binding:
   - .agent/scripts/test_runner.js
   - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
+  - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
 ---
 
 # Systematic Debugging — Root Cause Mastery
 
----
-
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before debugging issues or analyzing stack traces, you MUST inspect:
-
-1. Single Variable Isolation (Section 15) → Change ONE variable at a time when debugging; ban shotgun debugging or multi-file edits simultaneously
-2. Deterministic Reproduction Pre-requisite (Section 29) → Write a failing deterministic test/reproduction script FIRST before modifying code logic
-3. Stack Trace Application Line Extraction (Section 98) → Trace up past `node_modules` to locate the top-most application code frame you wrote
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `systematic-debugging` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
 
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
 
 ## Activation Boundaries
 
-- **Activate when:** Operating in tasks requiring Systematic debugging framework. Root-cause isolation, 4-phase methodology, hypothesis testing, log tracing, avoiding shotgun-surgery, memory allocation analysis, and empirical evidence gathering. Use when debugging complex, highly-coupled, or elusive bugs across mixed execution environments..
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls strictly outside systematic-debugging domain or belongs to a different dedicated specialist.
+- **Activate when:** Use when Systematic debugging framework. Root-cause isolation, 4-phase methodology, hypothesis testing, log tracing, avoiding shotgun-surgery, memory allocation analysis, and empirical evidence gathering. Use when debugging complex, highly-coupled, or elusive bugs across mixed execution environments.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `systematic-debugging` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
+---
+
 
 ## Hallucination Traps (Read First)
 
@@ -133,37 +154,45 @@ Do not skim. Stack traces tell the exact sequence of destruction.
 
 ---
 
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
 ---
 
-AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
 
-1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
-2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
-3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
-4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Hallucinated Tool Capabilities** | Assuming an external library or CLI command exists without verification | Run a verification check or verify package.json before referencing tools |
+| **Premature Completion Claim** | Declaring a task finished because code was generated without verification | Execute tests, linters, or terminal commands to provide concrete proof |
+| **Context Bloat Dumping** | Pasting entire multi-thousand-line files into prompt context | Extract targeted excerpts, symbols, and signatures to preserve tokens |
 
 ---
 
 ## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `orchestrator` · `agent-organizer` · `logic-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Did I deconstruct the root objective before proposing architecture?
+✅ Did I identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and parallelizable sub-tasks?
+✅ Did I avoid over-engineering and select the simplest effective pattern?
+✅ Did I verify assumptions with concrete file reads instead of speculation?
+✅ Did I establish measurable verification criteria before completion?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.

package/.agent/skills/tailwind-patterns/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 ---
 name: tailwind-patterns
-description: Tailwind CSS v4+ mastery. CSS-first configuration, @theme directive, container queries, scroll-driven animations, logical properties, clamp(), fluid typography, responsive design, dark mode, custom variants, component extraction, and performance optimization. Use when styling with Tailwind, building design systems, or optimizing CSS output.
-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
-version: 4.0.0
-last-updated: 2026-09-07
+description: Use when Tailwind CSS v4+ mastery. CSS-first configuration, @theme directive, container queries, scroll-driven animations, logical properties, clamp(), fluid typography, responsive design, dark mode, custom variants, component extraction, and performance optimization. Use when styling with Tailwind, building design systems, or optimizing CSS output.
+version: 5.0.0
+last-updated: 2026-09-13
 skills:
   - baseline-ui
   - better-colors
   - shadcn-ui-expert
+tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Edit, Write
 scripts-binding:
   - .agent/scripts/lint_runner.js
   - .agent/scripts/verify_all.js
@@ -15,21 +15,41 @@ scripts-binding:
 
 # Tailwind CSS v4+ — CSS-First Mastery
 
----
-
 ## Mandatory Pre-Flight Context Inspection
 
-Before engineering Tailwind CSS styles or themes, you MUST inspect:
-
-1. CSS-First v4 Configuration (Section 19) → Use `@import "tailwindcss";` and `@theme { }` in CSS files instead of deprecated `tailwind.config.js`
-2. Viewport Height Units (Section 151) → Use `min-h-svh` (small viewport height) or `min-h-dvh` instead of broken mobile `min-h-screen`
-3. Container Query Prefix (Section 204) → Use `@sm:`, `@md:`, `@lg:` container prefixes for component-level responsiveness rather than viewport `sm:`, `md:`, `lg:`
+Before generating, refactoring, or reviewing code in the `tailwind-patterns` domain, inspect these 5 critical parameters:
 
+1. **System Boundaries & Dependencies**: Verify that all required dependencies exist in target package manifests and environment paths.
+2. **Runtime Context & Platform Invariants**: Confirm target platform constraints (Node.js, Browser, Mobile OS, Edge runtime) before applying APIs.
+3. **Execution Guardrails**: Identify potential side-effects, state mutations, and unhandled asynchronous exceptions.
+4. **Validation & Type Contracts**: Validate input data schemas and strict type constraints across all module interfaces.
+5. **Observability & Proof of Execution**: Ensure execution produces tangible verification signals (terminal output, tests, metrics).
 
 ## Activation Boundaries
 
-- **Activate when:** Operating in tasks requiring Tailwind CSS v4+ mastery. CSS-first configuration, @theme directive, container queries, scroll-driven animations, logical properties, clamp(), fluid typography, responsive design, dark mode, custom variants, component extraction, and performance optimization. Use when styling with Tailwind, building design systems, or optimizing CSS output..
-- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls strictly outside tailwind-patterns domain or belongs to a different dedicated specialist.
+- **Activate when:** Use when Tailwind CSS v4+ mastery. CSS-first configuration, @theme directive, container queries, scroll-driven animations, logical properties, clamp(), fluid typography, responsive design, dark mode, custom variants, component extraction, and performance optimization. Use when styling with Tailwind, building design systems, or optimizing CSS output.
+- **DO NOT activate when:** The task falls outside the `tailwind-patterns` domain or is managed by a different dedicated specialist.
+
+## 🔁 Multi-Pass Execution Protocol
+
+Execute all non-trivial tasks through this 7-pass cognitive loop:
+
+| Pass | Phase | Core Action |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Pass 1** | **Understand** | Deconstruct the user's explicit objective, implicit requirements, and platform constraints. |
+| **Pass 2** | **Plan** | Decompose the task into smallest logical steps; map dependencies and required tool calls. |
+| **Pass 3** | **Execute** | Implement the solution with production-grade craft, zero placeholders, and strict typing. |
+| **Pass 4** | **Verify** | Run linters, unit tests, or compiler checks to validate structural correctness. |
+| **Pass 5** | **Attack** | Perform an adversarial review searching for edge-case failures, race conditions, and traps. |
+| **Pass 6** | **Improve** | Eliminate discovered friction, optimize performance, and harden error boundaries. |
+| **Pass 7** | **Quality Gate** | Enforce Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) with concrete terminal proof before finalizing. |
+
+---
+
+## 🛠️ Technical Architecture & Reference Recipes
+
+---
+
 
 ---
 
@@ -594,37 +614,45 @@ Before engineering Tailwind CSS styles or themes, you MUST inspect:
 
 ---
 
+## 🚨 Edge-Case & Failure Mode Matrix
+
+| Scenario | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Empty or Null Inputs** | Unhandled exception or unexpected rendering collapse | Enforce fallback guards, optional chaining, and explicit empty state handlers |
+| **Network Timeout / Latency** | Hanging operations or duplicate side-effects | Implement bounded abort controllers, exponential backoff, and idempotency keys |
+| **Concurrency / Race Conditions** | Stale state overwrite or inconsistent data mutations | Use atomic transactions, mutex locking, or cancel-on-resubmit controls |
+| **Invalid Schema / Malformed Payload** | Downstream runtime errors or security injection | Validate boundary payloads with Zod/Pydantic schemas prior to execution |
+| **Resource / Memory Saturation** | OOM errors, frame drops, or memory leaks | Clean up listeners, cancel active timers, and enforce pagination/virtualization |
+
 ---
 
-AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
+## 🤖 LLM-Specific Traps Table
 
-1. **Over-engineering:** Proposing complex abstractions or distributed systems when a simpler approach suffices.
-2. **Hallucinated Libraries/Methods:** Using non-existent methods or packages. Always `// VERIFY` or check `package.json` / `requirements.txt`.
-3. **Skipping Edge Cases:** Writing the "happy path" and ignoring error handling, timeouts, or data validation.
-4. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-5. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or re-raising.
+| Anti-Pattern | What AI Commonly Does Wrong | What Is Actually Correct |
+|:---|:---|:---|
+| **Uncontrolled Re-render Loop** | Mutating state inside render bodies or omitting hook dependencies | Wrap effects with explicit deps and isolate reactive derivations in useMemo |
+| **Accessibility Neglect** | Interactive <div> without role="button", tabIndex, or onKeyDown | Use semantic <button> or provide ARIA role, keyboard handlers, and focus ring |
+| **Layout Shift Flash** | Images/dynamic content without aspect-ratio or explicit dimensions | Enforce aspect-ratio or skeleton placeholders to guarantee zero CLS |
 
 ---
 
 ## 🏛️ Tribunal Verification & Guardrails
 
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+**Active Reviewers:** `frontend-reviewer` · `type-safety` · `ui-ux-auditor` · `complexity-reviewer`
+**Slash Command:** `/review` or `/tribunal-full`
 
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit Checklist
 
-### ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
 ```
-✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
-✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
-✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
-✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
+✅ Are all component props strictly typed with zero implicit "any"?
+✅ Are responsive breakpoints, fluid typography, and optical balance verified?
+✅ Is accessibility (ARIA labels, keyboard focus, contrast) validated?
+✅ Are re-renders minimized and state lifecycles cleanly separated?
+✅ Did I verify all imported UI components and icon sets actually exist?
 ```
 
 ### 🛑 Verification-Before-Completion (VBC) Protocol
+
 **CRITICAL:** You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.
 - ❌ **Forbidden:** Declaring a task complete because the output "looks correct."
-- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing tests, compile success, or equivalent proof) that your output works as intended.
+- ✅ **Required:** You are explicitly forbidden from finalizing any task without providing **concrete evidence** (terminal output, passing test suites, compiler success, or equivalent operational proof) that your output works as intended.