psyclaw 0.27.22 → 0.28.0

package/vendor/ars/academic-paper/references/citation_format_switcher.md

@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+# Citation Format Switcher — Multi-Citation Format Switching
+
+Quick-reference for switching between 5 citation formats. Used by `citation_compliance_agent` and `formatter_agent`.
+
+## Format Comparison Matrix
+
+### In-Text Citation Patterns
+
+| Scenario | APA 7th | Chicago (Notes) | Chicago (Author-Date) | MLA 9th | IEEE | Vancouver |
+|----------|---------|-----------------|----------------------|---------|------|-----------|
+| Single author | (Smith, 2024) | ¹ (footnote) | (Smith 2024) | (Smith 45) | [1] | ¹ (superscript) |
+| Two authors | (Smith & Jones, 2024) | ¹ | (Smith and Jones 2024) | (Smith and Jones 45) | [1] | ¹ |
+| 3+ authors | (Smith et al., 2024) | ¹ | (Smith et al. 2024) | (Smith et al. 45) | [1] | ¹ |
+| Direct quote | (Smith, 2024, p. 45) | ¹ | (Smith 2024, 45) | (Smith 45) | [1, p. 45] | ¹⁽ᵖ⁴⁵⁾ |
+| Multiple works | (Chen, 2023; Smith, 2024) | ¹ ² | (Chen 2023; Smith 2024) | (Chen 12; Smith 45) | [1], [2] | ¹˒² |
+| Order | Alphabetical | Order of appearance | Alphabetical | Alphabetical | Order of appearance | Order of appearance |
+
+### Reference List Naming
+
+| Format | Section Title | Entry Order |
+|--------|--------------|-------------|
+| APA 7th | References | Alphabetical |
+| Chicago (Notes) | Bibliography | Alphabetical |
+| Chicago (Author-Date) | References | Alphabetical |
+| MLA 9th | Works Cited | Alphabetical |
+| IEEE | References | Order of appearance |
+| Vancouver | References | Order of appearance |
+
+## Format Details
+
+### APA 7th Edition
+**Discipline**: Education, Psychology, Social Sciences
+
+**Journal Article**:
+```
+Smith, J. A., & Jones, B. C. (2024). Article title in sentence case.
+    Journal Title in Title Case, 45(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.xxxx
+```
+
+**Book**:
+```
+Smith, J. A. (2024). Book title in sentence case (2nd ed.). Publisher.
+```
+
+**Key rules**: Hanging indent, DOI as URL, sentence case for titles, "&" before last author.
+
+---
+
+### Chicago 17th (Notes-Bibliography)
+**Discipline**: History, Humanities, some Social Sciences
+
+**Footnote (first citation)**:
+```
+1. John A. Smith and Betty C. Jones, "Article Title in Title Case,"
+Journal Title 45, no. 2 (2024): 123, https://doi.org/10.xxxx.
+```
+
+**Footnote (subsequent)**:
+```
+2. Smith and Jones, "Article Title," 130.
+```
+
+**Bibliography entry**:
+```
+Smith, John A., and Betty C. Jones. "Article Title in Title Case."
+    Journal Title 45, no. 2 (2024): 123-145.
+    https://doi.org/10.xxxx.
+```
+
+**Key rules**: Full names, title case throughout, footnotes + bibliography, period after URL.
+
+---
+
+### Chicago 17th (Author-Date)
+**Discipline**: Natural Sciences, some Social Sciences
+
+**In-text**: (Smith 2024, 45)
+
+**Reference**:
+```
+Smith, John A. 2024. "Article Title in Title Case." Journal Title
+    45 (2): 123-145. https://doi.org/10.xxxx.
+```
+
+**Key rules**: Year after author name, full names in reference, title case.
+
+---
+
+### MLA 9th Edition
+**Discipline**: Literature, Languages, Cultural Studies
+
+**In-text**: (Smith 45) — author + page, no comma, no year
+
+**Works Cited**:
+```
+Smith, John A., and Betty C. Jones. "Article Title in Title Case."
+    Journal Title, vol. 45, no. 2, 2024, pp. 123-45.
+```
+
+**Key rules**: No year in in-text, page numbers always, containers model, no DOI in basic format (include if online), title case for all titles.
+
+---
+
+### IEEE
+**Discipline**: Engineering, Computer Science, Technology
+
+**In-text**: [1] — numbered brackets in order of appearance
+
+**Reference**:
+```
+[1] J. A. Smith and B. C. Jones, "Article title in sentence case,"
+    Journal Title, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 123-145, Feb. 2024,
+    doi: 10.xxxx.
+```
+
+**Key rules**: Numbered [N], initials before surname, abbreviated month, "doi:" prefix (not URL).
+
+---
+
+### Vancouver
+**Discipline**: Medicine, Biomedical Sciences, Nursing
+
+**In-text**: Superscript numbers ¹ or (1) in order of appearance
+
+**Reference**:
+```
+1. Smith JA, Jones BC. Article title in sentence case. Journal Title.
+   2024;45(2):123-145. doi:10.xxxx
+```
+
+**Key rules**: Numbered in order of appearance, no spaces in initials, abbreviated journal titles (per NLM), semicolon before volume, colon before pages.
+
+## Conversion Quick Reference
+
+### APA → Chicago (Notes-Bibliography)
+1. Change in-text (Author, Year) → footnotes
+2. Expand first names in reference list
+3. Change sentence case → title case for article titles
+4. Add period after URLs
+5. Rename "References" → "Bibliography"
+
+### APA → MLA
+1. Remove years from in-text, add page numbers
+2. Expand first names, change "&" → "and"
+3. Change format: vol., no., year order
+4. Remove DOIs (unless online-only source)
+5. Rename "References" → "Works Cited"
+
+### APA → IEEE
+1. Change (Author, Year) → [N] numbered brackets
+2. Reorder references by appearance (not alphabetical)
+3. Change to initials-first format
+4. Add "doi:" prefix to DOIs
+5. Abbreviate month names
+
+### APA → Vancouver
+1. Change (Author, Year) → superscript numbers
+2. Reorder references by appearance
+3. Remove spaces between initials
+4. Abbreviate journal titles (NLM catalog)
+5. Use semicolons/colons for volume/page separators
+
+## Chinese Citation Format Switching
+
+### APA 7.0 Chinese Format
+
+For complete specifications, see `apa7_chinese_citation_guide.md`. Below is a quick reference.
+
+**Chinese journal article**:
+```
+Wang, Da-Ming, & Li, Xiao-Hua (2024). Article title. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
+```
+
+**Chinese book**:
+```
+Zhang, San (2023). Book title. Publisher.
+```
+
+**Government publication**:
+```
+Ministry of Education (2024). Publication title. https://url
+```
+
+### Mixed Chinese-English Reference Handling
+
+**In-text citations**:
+- Chinese uses full-width parentheses: (Author, Year)
+- English uses half-width parentheses: (Author, Year)
+- Chinese multiple authors use enumeration comma; English uses &
+
+**Reference list ordering**:
+
+| Option | Description | Applicable Scenario |
+|------|------|---------|
+| **Option A (Recommended)** | Chinese first (ordered by stroke count), English after (ordered alphabetically) | Convention for most Taiwan journals |
+| **Option B** | Mixed Chinese-English ordering (unified stroke count / alphabetical) | Some international journals |
+
+**Same author with both Chinese and English works**: List separately — Chinese works go in the Chinese section, English works go in the English section.
+
+### Format Conversion Notes (Chinese Papers)
+
+**Chinese APA → Chicago**:
+1. Publication format differs (APA 7 does not require publication location, Chicago does)
+2. Change titles to "title case" format
+3. Add footnote citation system
+
+**Chinese APA → IEEE**:
+1. Add numbered labels [N]
+2. Remove year from after author position
+3. Order by citation appearance (not stroke count)
+
+**Chinese paper format conventions**:
+- Most Taiwan journals use APA
+- Humanities disciplines (history, literature) occasionally use Chicago
+- Engineering/CS fields mostly use IEEE
+- Medical fields use Vancouver
+
+---
+
+## AI-Generated Content Citation (by Format)
+
+| Format | How to Cite AI |
+|--------|---------------|
+| APA 7th | OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (Version 4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com |
+| Chicago | OpenAI. ChatGPT. Version 4. 2024. Large language model. https://chat.openai.com. |
+| MLA | "ChatGPT response to [prompt description]." OpenAI, 15 Mar. 2024, chat.openai.com. |
+| IEEE | [N] OpenAI, "ChatGPT," ver. 4, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://chat.openai.com |
+| Vancouver | OpenAI. ChatGPT [Large language model]. 2024. Available from: https://chat.openai.com |

package/vendor/ars/academic-paper/references/committee_correspondence_protocol.md

@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+# Committee Correspondence Protocol (#668)
+
+This is the `committee-correspondence` variant of `academic-paper`
+`revision-coach`. It structures comments already returned by a real committee or
+institutional review office. It never simulates a committee, predicts satisfaction,
+or makes a human-subjects determination.
+
+Canonical schema:
+`shared/contracts/human_subjects/committee_correspondence.schema.json`.
+Artifact version: `committee-correspondence/1.0`.
+Deterministic checker: `scripts/check_committee_correspondence.py`.
+Design authority:
+`docs/design/2026-08-08-668-committee-correspondence-spec.md`.
+
+## Activation gate
+
+Use this variant only when the user explicitly identifies the input as comments or
+a letter from a real committee/institutional review office and asks for tracking,
+response preparation, or resubmission organization. Do not infer official authority
+from formal tone, letterhead-like prose, words such as “required,” or a file name.
+
+If the source is ordinary manuscript peer review, use normal `revision-coach`. If
+the source identity is uncertain, ask the user to identify it before choosing the
+variant. V1 accepts UTF-8 letter text. For a binary PDF/DOCX, retain the user’s
+original file outside this bundle and obtain a UTF-8 export/transcription; label
+that textual source honestly rather than claiming byte identity with the binary.
+
+This variant is standalone and separate from paper-review traceability. It MUST NOT:
+
+- emit Schema 11 `commitment_extracted` or a peer-review Revision Roadmap;
+- assign Major/Minor/Editorial, P1/P2/P3, severity, or model priority;
+- write to the Material Passport or claim a Stage 4.5 integrity pass;
+- state that a concern is resolved, that a response will satisfy the committee, or
+  that any artifact is submission-ready;
+- translate committee wording into another jurisdiction’s taxonomy.
+
+## Required interaction
+
+1. Preserve the supplied UTF-8 text exactly as `source_letter.txt`. Do not normalize
+   newlines, whitespace, punctuation, or spelling.
+2. Segment every byte from zero through EOF into `comment` or `non_comment` rows.
+   Headers, sign-offs, decision metadata, and other non-comment text remain visible.
+3. Show the byte-complete segmentation to the user. The user confirms or corrects
+   comment boundaries before the tracker is final.
+4. Create one concern per confirmed comment segment in source order. A compound
+   comment remains one concern with multiple `action_type` values. Separately
+   numbered subcomments may be separate segments.
+5. Copy `verbatim_text` from the exact source bytes. Compute all SHA-256 fields and
+   byte ranges; do not ask a model to reproduce hashes from memory.
+6. Classify `authority_status` only from explicit committee language or author
+   confirmation. When neither exists, use `unclear` plus an unresolved basis.
+7. Fill artifact, owner, dependency, and required-before fields only when the letter,
+   author, or selected profile supplies them. Empty/unresolved is valid and preferred
+   to inference.
+8. Present the concern records to the user for confirmation. Working views may
+   reorder the complete concern set but never replace source order.
+9. Emit the placeholder-only response skeleton. It contains one concern marker,
+   author-response placeholder, and evidence placeholder per concern.
+10. Run the deterministic checker and report any failure without claiming partial
+    completion.
+
+## Bundle layout
+
+Use `committee_correspondence/<source_sha256_first_12>/`:
+
+```text
+<12-hex>/
+├── source_letter.txt
+├── concern_tracker.json
+└── response_skeleton.md
+```
+
+All tracker paths are bundle-relative. Never point the checker at arbitrary local
+files through a tracker path. Do not use symlinks.
+
+## Classification vocabulary
+
+`authority_status` is one of:
+
+- `explicitly_required` — the source explicitly requires the action;
+- `conditional` — the source states an if/then or contingent requirement;
+- `question` — the source asks for information without settling the answer;
+- `suggestion` — the source explicitly presents an optional suggestion;
+- `unclear` — none of the above is textually supported or the user has not confirmed.
+
+`action_type[]` is multi-valued:
+
+- `design`
+- `explanation`
+- `revise_artifact`
+- `add_artifact`
+- `administrative`
+- `legal_or_policy_check`
+
+Do not collapse a compound comment into a single label. Do not add a priority or
+severity field. Source order is not priority.
+
+## Optional authority-profile enrichment
+
+No selected profile is a supported terminal input state:
+
+```json
+{
+  "state": "not_selected",
+  "selected_profile_ids": [],
+  "artifact_resolution_state": "artifact_agnostic"
+}
+```
+
+When a user later selects a #666 profile, profile-derived artifact names and
+requirement ids carry explicit provenance. The profile cannot rewrite source text,
+authority status, owner, deadline, dependency, or order. A failed lookup uses
+`artifact_resolution_state=unresolved`; it does not silently fall back to another
+jurisdiction.
+
+## Response skeleton
+
+The skeleton begins with exactly:
+
+```markdown
+Status: drafting aid — no concern is asserted resolved.
+```
+
+Each concern block uses:
+
+```markdown
+<!-- concern:CC-001 -->
+### Concern CC-001
+
+**Draft response:** [AUTHOR RESPONSE REQUIRED — drafting aid; do not claim resolved]
+
+**Evidence:** [EVIDENCE OR ARTIFACT POINTER REQUIRED]
+```
+
+It ends with exactly:
+
+```markdown
+> **Human-subjects boundary:** This output does not authorize recruitment, consent, access to identifiable data, intervention, or data collection.
+```
+
+The skeleton is not a completed response and contains no claim that work occurred.
+During later drafting, keep the original skeleton as the checked baseline; save a
+drafted response as a separate artifact rather than overwriting its hash-bound
+placeholder state.
+
+## Handoff
+
+After user confirmation and a passing checker result, hand off both
+`concern_tracker.json` and `response_skeleton.md` to response drafting or
+resubmission work. Downstream work joins on `concern_id` and preserves the source
+locator. Evidence remains absent until the author supplies a real artifact pointer.
+
+Run:
+
+```bash
+python scripts/check_committee_correspondence.py \
+  committee_correspondence/<12-hex>/concern_tracker.json
+```

package/vendor/ars/academic-paper/references/credit_authorship_guide.md

@@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
+# CRediT Authorship Guide
+
+Used by `intake_agent`, `formatter_agent`, and `draft_writer_agent`.
+
+## Overview
+
+CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) is a standardized taxonomy of author contributions, co-developed by CASRAI and NISO in 2015. It has now been adopted by over 50 major publishers (Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, Taylor & Francis, PLOS, etc.). CRediT defines 14 contribution roles; each author may be assigned one or more roles, and each role may be undertaken by one or more authors.
+
+---
+
+## CRediT 14 Contribution Roles
+
+### 1. Conceptualization
+
+**Definition**: Ideas; formulation or evolution of overarching research goals and aims.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Proposing the research concept of "the impact of declining birthrate on private university management strategies"
+- Establishing the research question: examining the impact pathways of the HEEACT accreditation system on teaching quality
+- Designing the research framework: applying BSC (Balanced Scorecard) to university self-assessment
+
+### 2. Data Curation
+
+**Definition**: Management activities to annotate (produce metadata), scrub data and maintain research data (including software code, where it is necessary for interpreting the data itself) for initial use and later re-use.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Organizing MOE (Ministry of Education) public statistics and building a cross-year comparative database
+- Cleaning UCAN competency diagnostic raw data, handling missing values and outliers
+- Building an institutional metadata mapping table (including name changes and merger records)
+
+### 3. Formal Analysis
+
+**Definition**: Application of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize study data.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Performing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze the relationship between accreditation indicators and student learning outcomes
+- Conducting Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to evaluate university operational efficiency
+- Using text mining techniques to analyze self-assessment report texts
+
+### 4. Funding Acquisition
+
+**Definition**: Acquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Applying for NSTC (National Science and Technology Council) research grants
+- Obtaining MOE Higher Education Sprout Project funding
+- Securing seed project funding from the institutional Office of Research and Development
+
+### 5. Investigation
+
+**Definition**: Conducting a research and investigation process, specifically performing the experiments, or data/evidence collection.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Conducting a survey: surveying faculty across all higher education institutions on the current state of teaching practice research
+- Conducting in-depth interviews: interviewing quality assurance directors at 10 universities
+- Collecting self-assessment reports and site visit records from various institutions
+
+### 6. Methodology
+
+**Definition**: Development or design of methodology; creation of models.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Designing a mixed-methods research framework (quantitative survey + qualitative interviews)
+- Developing a higher education quality indicator assessment tool
+- Constructing an indicator system for a university exit early-warning model
+
+### 7. Project Administration
+
+**Definition**: Management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Coordinating the work progress of a cross-institutional research team
+- Managing phased outputs of a multi-year NSTC grant
+- Arranging accreditation site visit schedules and committee member assignments
+
+### 8. Resources
+
+**Definition**: Provision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, computing resources, or other analysis tools.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Providing access to an Institutional Research (IR) database
+- Providing authorization to use HEEACT accreditation data
+- Providing high-performance computing resources for large-scale text analysis
+
+### 9. Software
+
+**Definition**: Programming, software development; designing computer programs; implementation of the computer code and supporting algorithms; testing of existing code components.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Developing an automated accreditation indicator calculation dashboard
+- Writing Python/R statistical analysis code
+- Building an NLP text analysis system
+
+### 10. Supervision
+
+**Definition**: Oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Supervising graduate students in conducting thesis research
+- Serving as principal investigator and monitoring research quality
+- Providing methodological guidance as a senior scholar
+
+### 11. Validation
+
+**Definition**: Verification, whether as a part of the activity or separate, of the overall replication/reproducibility of results/experiments and other research outputs.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Verifying the robustness of quantitative analysis results (sensitivity analysis)
+- Using triangulation to confirm qualitative research findings
+- Cross-checking the consistency of different data sources
+
+### 12. Visualization
+
+**Definition**: Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically visualization/data presentation.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Creating accreditation indicator trend charts and dashboards
+- Designing research framework diagrams and conceptual model diagrams
+- Creating charts and heatmaps for statistical analysis results
+
+### 13. Writing -- Original Draft
+
+**Definition**: Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft (including substantive translation).
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Writing the complete initial draft of the paper (including all chapters)
+- Translating the Chinese initial draft into an English submission version
+- Writing specific chapters (e.g., literature review or methodology)
+
+### 14. Writing -- Review & Editing
+
+**Definition**: Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work by those from the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary or revision — including pre- or post-publication stages.
+
+**Higher Education Research Context Examples**:
+- Reviewing and revising co-authors' initial drafts
+- Making revisions based on peer review comments
+- Proofreading the final version for text and formatting
+
+---
+
+## ICMJE Authorship Criteria
+
+The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) authorship criteria are widely referenced across all academic disciplines. **All four conditions must be met** to be listed as an author:
+
+| # | Condition | Description |
+|---|------|------|
+| 1 | Substantial contributions | Substantial contributions to the conception or design; or to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data |
+| 2 | Drafting or revising | Participation in drafting the manuscript or critically reviewing important intellectual content |
+| 3 | Final approval | Approval of the final version for submission |
+| 4 | Accountability | Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part are appropriately investigated and resolved |
+
+### Contributions That Do Not Qualify for Authorship
+
+The following contributions typically **do not qualify** for authorship and should be listed in the Acknowledgments:
+
+- Providing funding support only
+- Providing administrative support or resources only
+- Language editing or translation only
+- Data entry or transcription only
+- Serving as a department head only (without actual research involvement)
+
+---
+
+## Contribution Matrix Example
+
+### Author x Role Matrix
+
+| Role | Author A (Corresponding Author) | Author B | Author C |
+|------|:---:|:---:|:---:|
+| Conceptualization | Lead | Supporting | -- |
+| Data curation | -- | Lead | Supporting |
+| Formal analysis | Supporting | Lead | -- |
+| Funding acquisition | Lead | -- | -- |
+| Investigation | Supporting | Lead | Lead |
+| Methodology | Lead | Supporting | -- |
+| Project administration | Lead | -- | -- |
+| Resources | Lead | -- | -- |
+| Software | -- | Lead | -- |
+| Supervision | Lead | -- | -- |
+| Validation | Supporting | Supporting | Lead |
+| Visualization | -- | Lead | Supporting |
+| Writing -- original draft | Lead | Supporting | -- |
+| Writing -- review & editing | Lead | Supporting | Supporting |
+
+**Label Descriptions**:
+- **Lead**: Primarily responsible for this contribution
+- **Supporting**: Assisting or auxiliary role
+- **--**: Did not participate
+
+---
+
+## AI Not Listed as Author Policy
+
+### Major Publisher and Organization Positions
+
+| Organization/Publisher | Policy Summary | Effective Date |
+|------------|---------|---------|
+| **ICMJE** | AI tools do not meet the four authorship criteria (cannot be accountable, cannot approve); must not be listed as authors | 2023 |
+| **APA** (American Psychological Association) | AI not listed as author; AI use must be disclosed in methods or acknowledgments | 2023 |
+| **Nature/Springer Nature** | LLMs not listed as authors; must disclose usage in methods or acknowledgments | 2023 |
+| **Science/AAAS** | AI-generated text cannot be presented as original work; AI use must be disclosed | 2023 |
+| **Elsevier** | AI tools not listed as authors; must disclose in the manuscript | 2023 |
+| **Wiley** | AI not listed as author; must describe usage in acknowledgments | 2023 |
+| **Taylor & Francis** | AI not listed as author; must disclose AI use at submission | 2023 |
+| **IEEE** | AI must not be listed as author or co-author | 2023 |
+
+### AI Disclosure Best Practices
+
+1. **Clearly state in Methods or Acknowledgments** which AI tools were used and how they were used
+2. **Authors take full responsibility** for all AI-assisted output content
+3. **AI-produced text must not be directly presented as original research findings**
+4. **Recommended format for citing AI tools** (per APA 7th):
+
+```
+OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (Version GPT-4) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/
+```
+
+---
+
+## CRediT Requirements Across Major Journals
+
+| Journal/Publisher | CRediT Requirement | Format |
+|------------|------------|------|
+| Most **Elsevier** journals | Mandatory | Select roles in submission system |
+| **PLOS ONE** | Mandatory | Stated in text within the manuscript |
+| Some **Springer Nature** journals | Encouraged | Stated in text within the manuscript |
+| Some **Wiley** journals | Encouraged | Text or table within the manuscript |
+| All **MDPI** journals | Mandatory | Dedicated section at end of manuscript |
+| Some **Taylor & Francis** journals | Encouraged | Stated in text within the manuscript |
+| **TSSCI** Taiwan journals | Few require it | Per individual journal regulations |
+
+---
+
+## Boundary Between Acknowledgments and Authorship
+
+| List as Author | List in Acknowledgments |
+|---------|---------|
+| Designed the research framework | Provided administrative support |
+| Wrote or substantially revised the manuscript | Language editing/translation |
+| Performed data analysis | Data entry/transcription |
+| Obtained research funding AND participated in research | Provided funding only without research involvement |
+| Designed the research methodology | Provided laboratory/equipment |
+| Supervised research and provided academic guidance | Served as administrative head only |
+
+### Acknowledgments Section Example
+
+```
+The authors would like to thank [Name] from [Institution] for administrative
+support, [Name] for language editing, and the anonymous reviewers for their
+constructive feedback. This study was conducted with the support of the
+Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan (HEEACT).
+```
+
+---
+
+## CRediT Statement Templates
+
+### English Version
+
+**Author Contributions Statement**:
+
+```
+[Author A]: Conceptualization, Methodology, Funding acquisition,
+Writing – original draft, Supervision, Project administration.
+[Author B]: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Visualization,
+Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
+[Author C]: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
+```
+
+### Chinese Version
+
+**Author Contributions Statement**:
+
+```
+[Author A]: Conceptualization, Methodology, Funding acquisition,
+Writing – original draft, Supervision, Project administration.
+[Author B]: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Visualization,
+Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
+[Author C]: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
+```
+
+### Chinese-English Role Mapping
+
+| English | Romanized Chinese |
+|------|------|
+| Conceptualization | Gai Nian Hua |
+| Data curation | Zi Liao Guan Li |
+| Formal analysis | Zheng Shi Fen Xi |
+| Funding acquisition | Jing Fei Qu De |
+| Investigation | Diao Cha Yan Jiu |
+| Methodology | Yan Jiu Fang Fa |
+| Project administration | Ji Hua Guan Li |
+| Resources | Zi Yuan Ti Gong |
+| Software | Ruan Ti Kai Fa |
+| Supervision | Zhi Dao Jian Du |
+| Validation | Yan Zheng |
+| Visualization | Shi Jue Hua |
+| Writing -- original draft | Zhuan Xie Chu Gao |
+| Writing -- review & editing | Shen Yue Xiu Ding |
+
+---
+
+## Reference Resources
+
+- CRediT official taxonomy: https://credit.niso.org/
+- ICMJE authorship criteria: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html
+- APA AI policy: https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/ai-policy
+- Nature AI policy: https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/editorial-policies/ai