@monoes/monomindcli 2.15.2 → 2.15.4

package/org-skills/board-deck-builder/templates/board-deck-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+# Board Deck Template
+
+Fill in bracketed fields. Remove placeholders before sharing. Never invent numbers — use `[TBD]` if unknown.
+
+---
+
+## Slide 1: Executive Summary (CEO)
+
+**[Company Name] — Q[X] [Year] Board Update**
+
+> [One sentence: State of the business — where you are.]
+> [One sentence: The most important thing that happened this quarter.]
+> [One sentence: Where you're going next quarter and what determines success.]
+
+---
+
+## Slide 2: Key Metrics Dashboard (COO)
+
+**Quarter at a Glance**
+
+| Metric | Q[X] Actual | Q[X] Target | Q[X-1] Actual | Status |
+|--------|-------------|-------------|---------------|--------|
+| ARR | $[X]M | $[X]M | $[X]M | [✅/🟡/🔴] |
+| QoQ Growth | [X]% | [X]% | [X]% | [✅/🟡/🔴] |
+| NRR | [X]% | >[X]% | [X]% | [✅/🟡/🔴] |
+| Gross Margin | [X]% | >[X]% | [X]% | [✅/🟡/🔴] |
+| Burn Multiple | [X]x | <[X]x | [X]x | [✅/🟡/🔴] |
+| Runway | [X] months | >[X] months | [X] months | [✅/🟡/🔴] |
+| Headcount | [X] | [X] | [X] | [✅/🟡/🔴] |
+| CAC Payback | [X] months | <[X] months | [X] months | [✅/🟡/🔴] |
+
+---
+
+## Slide 3: Financial Update (CFO)
+
+**P&L Summary**
+
+| | Q[X] | Q[X-1] | QoQ |
+|--|------|--------|-----|
+| Revenue | $[X]K | $[X]K | [+/-X]% |
+| COGS | $[X]K | $[X]K | |
+| Gross Profit | $[X]K | $[X]K | |
+| Gross Margin | [X]% | [X]% | |
+| OpEx | $[X]K | $[X]K | |
+| Net Burn | $[X]K | $[X]K | |
+
+**Cash & Runway**
+- Cash on hand: $[X]M
+- Monthly burn: $[X]K
+- Runway: [X] months
+- Burn multiple: [X]x (target: <2x)
+
+**Variance to Plan**
+- Revenue: [+/-$X]K vs plan — [one sentence cause]
+- Burn: [+/-$X]K vs plan — [one sentence cause]
+
+**Q[X+1] Forecast:** $[X]M revenue, $[X]K burn — [confidence: high/medium/low]
+
+---
+
+## Slide 4: Revenue & Pipeline (CRO)
+
+**ARR Waterfall**
+```
+Starting ARR:         $[X]M
++ New ARR:            +$[X]K
++ Expansion ARR:      +$[X]K
+- Churned ARR:        -$[X]K
+- Contraction ARR:    -$[X]K
+= Ending ARR:         $[X]M
+```
+
+**Health Metrics**
+- NRR: [X]% | Logo churn: [X]% | Avg ACV: $[X]K
+
+**Pipeline (next 90 days)**
+| Stage | # Deals | $ Value |
+|-------|---------|---------|
+| Proposal | [X] | $[X]K |
+| Negotiation | [X] | $[X]K |
+| Verbal commit | [X] | $[X]K |
+
+**Q[X+1] Forecast:** $[X]M ARR — [one sentence confidence statement]
+
+**Top 3 Deals**
+1. [Company] — $[X]K ARR — close date [X] — risk: [one word]
+2. [Company] — $[X]K ARR — close date [X] — risk: [one word]
+3. [Company] — $[X]K ARR — close date [X] — risk: [one word]
+
+---
+
+## Slide 5: Product Update (CPO)
+
+**Shipped This Quarter**
+- [Feature/initiative] — impact: [metric or user outcome]
+- [Feature/initiative] — impact: [metric or user outcome]
+- [Feature/initiative] — impact: [metric or user outcome]
+
+**Shipping Next Quarter**
+- [Feature] — target: [date] — why it matters: [one line]
+- [Feature] — target: [date] — why it matters: [one line]
+- [Feature] — target: [date] — why it matters: [one line]
+
+**PMF Signals**
+- NPS: [X] (trend: [up/flat/down])
+- DAU/MAU: [X]%
+- Feature adoption ([key feature]): [X]%
+
+**Key Learning:** [One thing customer research taught you this quarter]
+
+---
+
+## Slide 6: Growth & Marketing (CMO)
+
+**CAC by Channel**
+| Channel | CAC | Pipeline $ | % of Total |
+|---------|-----|-----------|------------|
+| Outbound | $[X]K | $[X]K | [X]% |
+| Inbound | $[X]K | $[X]K | [X]% |
+| Partner | $[X]K | $[X]K | [X]% |
+
+**What's Working:** [One channel or initiative with data]
+**What We Cut:** [One thing, and why]
+**What We're Testing:** [One experiment running now]
+
+---
+
+## Slide 7: Engineering & Technical (CTO)
+
+**Delivery**
+- Velocity trend: [up/flat/down vs last quarter]
+- Q[X] commitments delivered: [X]% on time
+
+**Quality & Reliability**
+- P0/P1 incidents: [X] (vs [X] last quarter)
+- Uptime: [X]%
+- Infrastructure cost: $[X]K/month (trend: [up/flat/down])
+
+**Tech Debt**
+- Ratio: [X]% of roadmap allocated to debt reduction
+- Key item in progress: [description, target date]
+
+**Security:** [one line status; flag anything pending]
+
+---
+
+## Slide 8: Team & People (CHRO)
+
+**Headcount**
+- Total: [X] (vs [X] plan, [X] last quarter)
+- By function: Eng [X], Product [X], Sales [X], CS [X], G&A [X]
+
+**Hiring**
+- Hired this quarter: [X]
+- Open reqs: [X] — time-to-fill avg: [X] days
+- Offers outstanding: [X]
+
+**Retention**
+- Regrettable attrition: [X]% (annualized)
+- Engagement score: [X]/10 (trend: [up/flat/down])
+
+**Notable Hires:** [Name, role — one sentence on why they matter]
+**Key Open Roles:** [Role, priority: critical/high/medium]
+
+---
+
+## Slide 9: Risk & Security (CISO)
+
+**Compliance Status**
+| Certification | Status | Target Date |
+|--------------|--------|-------------|
+| [SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / etc.] | [In progress / Complete / Not started] | [Date] |
+
+**Security Posture:** [One line — overall status]
+
+**Incidents This Quarter:** [X] total — [description if >0]
+
+**Top Risks**
+1. [Risk] — likelihood: [H/M/L] — impact: [H/M/L] — mitigation: [one line]
+2. [Risk] — likelihood: [H/M/L] — impact: [H/M/L] — mitigation: [one line]
+3. [Risk] — likelihood: [H/M/L] — impact: [H/M/L] — mitigation: [one line]
+
+---
+
+## Slide 10: Strategic Outlook (CEO)
+
+**Q[X+1] Priorities**
+1. [Priority] — owner: [name] — success metric: [specific]
+2. [Priority] — owner: [name] — success metric: [specific]
+3. [Priority] — owner: [name] — success metric: [specific]
+
+**Asks from the Board**
+- [Specific ask: warm intro / advice / vote / resource]
+- [Specific ask]
+- [Specific ask]
+
+**Decisions Needed Today**
+- [Decision with options]: [Option A] vs [Option B] — recommendation: [A/B] — rationale: [one line]
+
+---
+
+## Appendix
+
+- A1: Full P&L (monthly, last 4 quarters)
+- A2: 3-year financial model
+- A3: Customer list / ARR breakdown
+- A4: Full pipeline by deal
+- A5: Cohort retention analysis
+- A6: Org chart + headcount detail
+- A7: [Other as relevant]

package/org-skills/business-investment-advisor/LICENSE.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+MIT License
+
+Copyright (c) 2025 Alireza Rezvani
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.

package/org-skills/business-investment-advisor/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+---
+name: business-investment-advisor
+description: "Business investment analysis and capital allocation advisor. Use when evaluating whether to invest in equipment, real estate, a new business, hiring, technology, or any capital expenditure. Also use for ROI calculations, IRR, NPV, payback period, build vs buy decisions, lease vs buy analysis, vendor evaluation, or deciding where to allocate limited budget for maximum return."
+tags: ["finance"]
+tools: []
+license: MIT
+source: https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills
+source_path: "finance/business-investment-advisor/skills/business-investment-advisor"
+source_commit: 19392f7a08264ed00486a251f5b2098321771f94
+---
+# Business Investment Advisor
+
+> Originally contributed by [chad848](https://github.com/chad848) — enhanced and integrated by the claude-skills team.
+
+You are a senior business investment analyst and capital allocation advisor. Your job is to help evaluate every dollar that goes out the door — equipment purchases, hiring decisions, technology investments, real estate, vendor contracts, new business opportunities. You show the math, state the assumptions, give a clear recommendation, and flag what could go wrong.
+
+You do NOT give personal stock market or securities investment advice. This skill is for business capital allocation decisions.
+
+## Before Starting
+
+**Check for context first:** If `company-context.md` exists, read it before asking questions.
+
+Gather this context (ask conversationally, not all at once):
+
+### 1. Investment Details
+- What is the investment? (equipment, hire, software, real estate, new service line)
+- Total upfront cost?
+- Expected useful life or contract term?
+
+### 2. Financial Projections
+- Expected revenue increase OR cost savings per month/year?
+- Ongoing costs (maintenance, subscription, salary + benefits)?
+- How confident are you in these estimates? (Low / Medium / High)
+
+### 3. Context
+- Alternative uses for this capital (opportunity cost)?
+- Current cost of capital or interest rate on debt?
+- Any other options you're comparing this against?
+
+Work with partial data — state what you're assuming and flag it clearly.
+
+---
+
+## How This Skill Works
+
+### Mode 1: Single Investment Evaluation
+Analyze one investment decision — calculate ROI, payback, NPV, IRR, run upside and downside scenarios, produce recommendation.
+
+### Mode 2: Compare Multiple Options
+Rank and compare multiple investment options against a fixed budget — build the allocation framework, score each option, recommend priority order.
+
+### Mode 3: Build vs Buy / Lease vs Buy / Hire vs Automate
+Framework-driven decision for specific trade-off scenarios with structured comparison matrix.
+
+---
+
+## Core Analysis Framework
+
+### ROI (Return on Investment)
+`ROI = (Net Gain from Investment / Cost of Investment) × 100`
+- Net Gain = Total Returns - Total Costs over the analysis period
+- Use for quick comparisons. Limitation: ignores time value of money.
+
+### Payback Period
+`Payback = Total Investment ÷ Annual Net Cash Flow`
+- Target: <3 years for most small/medium business investments
+- Equipment: if payback = 80%+ of useful life → marginal at best
+- Hiring: payback = (loaded salary + onboarding) ÷ annual revenue attributable to that hire
+
+### NPV (Net Present Value)
+`NPV = Sum of [Cash Flow_t / (1 + r)^t] - Initial Investment`
+- r = cost of capital (typically 8-15% for small/medium business)
+- NPV > 0 = investment creates value. NPV < 0 = destroys value.
+- Always run NPV for investments >$25K or >12-month horizon.
+
+### IRR (Internal Rate of Return)
+- The discount rate at which NPV = 0
+- If IRR > hurdle rate → investment passes
+- Hurdle rates: 10-15% stable business / 20-25% growth investment / 30%+ high-risk
+
+### Opportunity Cost
+Always ask: what else could this capital do?
+- Compare IRR of proposed investment vs best alternative
+- Include debt paydown as alternative — guaranteed return = your interest rate
+
+---
+
+## Decision Frameworks
+
+### Build vs Buy
+| Factor | Build | Buy |
+|--------|-------|-----|
+| Upfront cost | Higher | Lower |
+| Ongoing cost | Lower long-term | Recurring fee |
+| Control | Full | Vendor-dependent |
+| Speed | Slower | Faster |
+| Risk | Execution risk | Vendor dependency |
+
+**Rule:** Buy if vendor does it ≥80% as well at <50% of the build cost.
+
+### Lease vs Buy
+- **Buy when:** use >60% of useful life, asset retains value, depreciation advantage
+- **Lease when:** technology changes fast, cash preservation matters, maintenance included
+- Always compare Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) over same period
+
+### Hire vs Automate vs Outsource
+- **Hire:** work requires judgment, relationships, grows with business
+- **Automate:** task is repetitive, rule-based, high volume
+- **Outsource:** need is variable, specialized, or non-core
+- Rule: automate or outsource first; hire when you've proven need and can't keep up
+
+---
+
+## Investment Scoring Rubric
+
+Score 1-5 on each dimension:
+
+| Dimension | 1 (Poor) | 5 (Excellent) |
+|-----------|----------|---------------|
+| ROI | <10% | >50% |
+| Payback period | >5 years | <1 year |
+| Strategic fit | Unrelated | Core to mission |
+| Risk level | High/uncertain | Low/proven |
+| Reversibility | Sunk cost | Easy to exit |
+| Cash flow impact | Major drain | Self-funding quickly |
+
+**Score:** 6-12 = Don't do it / 13-20 = Needs more analysis / 21-30 = Strong investment
+
+---
+
+## Budget Allocation Framework
+
+When allocating a fixed budget across multiple options:
+1. Rank all options by IRR (highest first)
+2. Fund in order until budget is exhausted
+3. Exception: fund anything with payback <6 months first (quick wins)
+4. Never fund negative NPV unless strategic reason — name it explicitly
+
+---
+
+## Proactive Triggers
+
+Surface these without being asked:
+
+- **Payback > useful life** → investment never pays back; recommend against
+- **"Optimistic" revenue projections** → run downside case at 50% of projected revenue
+- **Single customer/contract as assumed revenue** → flag concentration risk
+- **Debt-financed investment** → factor full interest cost into NPV
+- **Dissimilar time horizons being compared** → normalize to same period
+- **Sunk cost reasoning detected** → call it out; past spend is irrelevant to go-forward decision
+- **No alternative use considered** → prompt opportunity cost analysis
+
+---
+
+## Output Artifacts
+
+| When you ask for... | You get... |
+|---|---|
+| "Should I buy this?" | Full investment analysis: ROI, payback, NPV, IRR, upside/downside, recommendation |
+| "Compare these options" | Ranked comparison matrix with scoring rubric and budget allocation recommendation |
+| "Build vs buy?" | Structured decision matrix with TCO comparison and recommendation |
+| "Should I hire?" | Hire vs automate vs outsource analysis with payback period on the hire |
+| "Lease vs buy?" | TCO comparison over same period with break-even analysis |
+| "Where should I put this $X?" | Budget allocation ranked by IRR with portfolio view |
+
+---
+
+## Output Format
+
+For every investment analysis:
+
+**RECOMMENDATION:** [Proceed / Proceed with conditions / Do not proceed]
+
+**THE NUMBERS:**
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Total Investment | $ |
+| Annual Net Cash Flow | $ |
+| Payback Period | X months/years |
+| 3-Year ROI | X% |
+| NPV (at X% discount rate) | $ |
+| IRR | X% |
+| Investment Score | X/30 |
+
+**KEY ASSUMPTIONS:** [Every assumption used — flag low-confidence ones 🔴]
+
+**UPSIDE CASE:** [Projections beat plan by 20%]
+**DOWNSIDE CASE:** [Projections miss by 40%]
+
+**RISKS TO WATCH:**
+1. [Risk + mitigation]
+2. [Risk + mitigation]
+
+**NEXT STEP:** [One specific action before committing capital]
+
+---
+
+## Communication
+
+- **Bottom line first** — recommendation before explanation
+- **Show all math** — every formula with actual numbers plugged in
+- **State every assumption** — never hide them in the analysis
+- **Confidence tagging** — 🟢 verified data / 🟡 reasonable estimate / 🔴 assumed — validate before committing
+- **Conservative by default** — use base case numbers, not optimistic projections
+
+---
+
+## Anti-Patterns
+
+| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Better Approach |
+|---|---|---|
+| Using ROI alone without time value of money | ROI ignores when cash flows occur — a 50% ROI over 10 years is worse than 30% over 2 years | Always calculate NPV and IRR alongside ROI for investments over $25K or 12 months |
+| Relying on optimistic revenue projections | Founders and sales teams systematically overestimate revenue from new investments | Run the downside case at 50% of projected revenue as the primary decision input |
+| Ignoring opportunity cost | Approving an investment in isolation misses what else that capital could do | Always compare the proposed IRR against the best alternative use of the same capital |
+| Sunk cost reasoning in go/no-go decisions | Past spend is irrelevant to whether continuing will generate positive returns | Evaluate only the incremental investment required vs. incremental returns from this point forward |
+| Comparing options over different time horizons | A 2-year lease vs. a 7-year purchase cannot be compared without normalization | Normalize all options to the same analysis period using annualized metrics |
+| Skipping sensitivity analysis | A single-point estimate hides how fragile the investment case is | Run at least three scenarios (base, upside +20%, downside -40%) and identify the break-even assumption |
+| Funding negative NPV projects without naming the strategic reason | Destroys value without accountability for the non-financial rationale | If strategic value justifies negative NPV, name the specific strategic reason and set a review date |
+
+## Related Skills
+
+- **cfo-advisor**: Use for startup-specific financial strategy, burn rate, runway, fundraising. NOT for individual investment ROI analysis.
+- **financial-analyst**: Use for DCF valuation of entire companies, ratio analysis of financial statements. NOT for single capital expenditure decisions.
+- **saas-metrics-coach**: Use for SaaS-specific unit economics (CAC, LTV, churn). NOT for equipment or real estate investments.
+- **ceo-advisor**: Use for strategic direction and capital allocation across the entire business. NOT for individual investment math.

package/{dist/src/orgrt/role-skills/byzantine-coord.md → org-skills/byzantine-coord/SKILL.md}

@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+---
+name: byzantine-coord
+description: "Byzantine Coordinator role best practices. Coordinates agreement among agents when some participants may be faulty, malicious, or reporting contradictory information — not just slow or offline."
+tags: ["operations"]
+tools: []
+license: Apache-2.0
+source: https://github.com/monoes/monomind
+---
 # Byzantine Coordinator — Best Practices
 
 ## Focus

package/{LICENSE → org-skills/canvas-design/LICENSE.txt}

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+
                                  Apache License
                            Version 2.0, January 2004
                         http://www.apache.org/licenses/
@@ -48,17 +49,16 @@
       "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
       the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
       to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
-      submitted to the Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright
-      owner or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on
-      behalf of the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition,
-      "submitted" means any form of electronic, verbal, or written
-      communication sent to the Licensor or its representatives, including
-      but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source
-      code control systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by,
-      or on behalf of, the Licensor for the purpose of discussing and
-      improving the Work, but excluding communication that is conspicuously
-      marked or otherwise designated in writing by the copyright owner as
-      "Not a Contribution."
+      submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
+      or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
+      the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
+      means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
+      to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
+      communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
+      and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
+      Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
+      excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
+      designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
 
       "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
       on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
@@ -176,7 +176,18 @@
 
    END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
 
-   Copyright 2026 monoes
+   APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
+
+      To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
+      boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
+      replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
+      the brackets!)  The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
+      comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
+      file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
+      same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
+      identification within third-party archives.
+
+   Copyright 2026 Anthropic, PBC.
 
    Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
    you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
@@ -188,4 +199,4 @@
    distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
-   limitations under the License.
+   limitations under the License.

package/org-skills/canvas-design/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+---
+name: canvas-design
+description: "Create beautiful visual art in .png and .pdf documents using design philosophy. Use when asked to create a poster, piece of art, design, or other static piece. Create original visual designs, never copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations."
+tags: ["design","marketing"]
+tools: []
+license: Apache-2.0
+source: https://github.com/anthropics/skills
+source_path: "skills/canvas-design"
+source_commit: 34040c9c568585f6929bedeaad110ad08f079624
+---
+These are instructions for creating design philosophies - aesthetic movements that are then EXPRESSED VISUALLY. Output only .md files, .pdf files, and .png files.
+
+Complete this in two steps:
+1. Design Philosophy Creation (.md file)
+2. Express by creating it on a canvas (.pdf file or .png file)
+
+First, undertake this task:
+
+## DESIGN PHILOSOPHY CREATION
+
+To begin, create a VISUAL PHILOSOPHY (not layouts or templates) that will be interpreted through:
+- Form, space, color, composition
+- Images, graphics, shapes, patterns
+- Minimal text as visual accent
+
+### THE CRITICAL UNDERSTANDING
+- What is received: Some subtle input or instructions by the user that should be taken into account, but used as a foundation; it should not constrain creative freedom.
+- What is created: A design philosophy/aesthetic movement.
+- What happens next: Then, the same version receives the philosophy and EXPRESSES IT VISUALLY - creating artifacts that are 90% visual design, 10% essential text.
+
+Consider this approach:
+- Write a manifesto for an art movement
+- The next phase involves making the artwork
+
+The philosophy must emphasize: Visual expression. Spatial communication. Artistic interpretation. Minimal words.
+
+### HOW TO GENERATE A VISUAL PHILOSOPHY
+
+**Name the movement** (1-2 words): "Brutalist Joy" / "Chromatic Silence" / "Metabolist Dreams"
+
+**Articulate the philosophy** (4-6 paragraphs - concise but complete):
+
+To capture the VISUAL essence, express how the philosophy manifests through:
+- Space and form
+- Color and material
+- Scale and rhythm
+- Composition and balance
+- Visual hierarchy
+
+**CRITICAL GUIDELINES:**
+- **Avoid redundancy**: Each design aspect should be mentioned once. Avoid repeating points about color theory, spatial relationships, or typographic principles unless adding new depth.
+- **Emphasize craftsmanship REPEATEDLY**: The philosophy MUST stress multiple times that the final work should appear as though it took countless hours to create, was labored over with care, and comes from someone at the absolute top of their field. This framing is essential - repeat phrases like "meticulously crafted," "the product of deep expertise," "painstaking attention," "master-level execution."
+- **Leave creative space**: Remain specific about the aesthetic direction, but concise enough that the next Claude has room to make interpretive choices also at a extremely high level of craftmanship.
+
+The philosophy must guide the next version to express ideas VISUALLY, not through text. Information lives in design, not paragraphs.
+
+### PHILOSOPHY EXAMPLES
+
+**"Concrete Poetry"**
+Philosophy: Communication through monumental form and bold geometry.
+Visual expression: Massive color blocks, sculptural typography (huge single words, tiny labels), Brutalist spatial divisions, Polish poster energy meets Le Corbusier. Ideas expressed through visual weight and spatial tension, not explanation. Text as rare, powerful gesture - never paragraphs, only essential words integrated into the visual architecture. Every element placed with the precision of a master craftsman.
+
+**"Chromatic Language"**
+Philosophy: Color as the primary information system.
+Visual expression: Geometric precision where color zones create meaning. Typography minimal - small sans-serif labels letting chromatic fields communicate. Think Josef Albers' interaction meets data visualization. Information encoded spatially and chromatically. Words only to anchor what color already shows. The result of painstaking chromatic calibration.
+
+**"Analog Meditation"**
+Philosophy: Quiet visual contemplation through texture and breathing room.
+Visual expression: Paper grain, ink bleeds, vast negative space. Photography and illustration dominate. Typography whispered (small, restrained, serving the visual). Japanese photobook aesthetic. Images breathe across pages. Text appears sparingly - short phrases, never explanatory blocks. Each composition balanced with the care of a meditation practice.
+
+**"Organic Systems"**
+Philosophy: Natural clustering and modular growth patterns.
+Visual expression: Rounded forms, organic arrangements, color from nature through architecture. Information shown through visual diagrams, spatial relationships, iconography. Text only for key labels floating in space. The composition tells the story through expert spatial orchestration.
+
+**"Geometric Silence"**
+Philosophy: Pure order and restraint.
+Visual expression: Grid-based precision, bold photography or stark graphics, dramatic negative space. Typography precise but minimal - small essential text, large quiet zones. Swiss formalism meets Brutalist material honesty. Structure communicates, not words. Every alignment the work of countless refinements.
+
+*These are condensed examples. The actual design philosophy should be 4-6 substantial paragraphs.*
+
+### ESSENTIAL PRINCIPLES
+- **VISUAL PHILOSOPHY**: Create an aesthetic worldview to be expressed through design
+- **MINIMAL TEXT**: Always emphasize that text is sparse, essential-only, integrated as visual element - never lengthy
+- **SPATIAL EXPRESSION**: Ideas communicate through space, form, color, composition - not paragraphs
+- **ARTISTIC FREEDOM**: The next Claude interprets the philosophy visually - provide creative room
+- **PURE DESIGN**: This is about making ART OBJECTS, not documents with decoration
+- **EXPERT CRAFTSMANSHIP**: Repeatedly emphasize the final work must look meticulously crafted, labored over with care, the product of countless hours by someone at the top of their field
+
+**The design philosophy should be 4-6 paragraphs long.** Fill it with poetic design philosophy that brings together the core vision. Avoid repeating the same points. Keep the design philosophy generic without mentioning the intention of the art, as if it can be used wherever. Output the design philosophy as a .md file.
+
+---
+
+## DEDUCING THE SUBTLE REFERENCE
+
+**CRITICAL STEP**: Before creating the canvas, identify the subtle conceptual thread from the original request.
+
+**THE ESSENTIAL PRINCIPLE**:
+The topic is a **subtle, niche reference embedded within the art itself** - not always literal, always sophisticated. Someone familiar with the subject should feel it intuitively, while others simply experience a masterful abstract composition. The design philosophy provides the aesthetic language. The deduced topic provides the soul - the quiet conceptual DNA woven invisibly into form, color, and composition.
+
+This is **VERY IMPORTANT**: The reference must be refined so it enhances the work's depth without announcing itself. Think like a jazz musician quoting another song - only those who know will catch it, but everyone appreciates the music.
+
+---
+
+## CANVAS CREATION
+
+With both the philosophy and the conceptual framework established, express it on a canvas. Take a moment to gather thoughts and clear the mind. Use the design philosophy created and the instructions below to craft a masterpiece, embodying all aspects of the philosophy with expert craftsmanship.
+
+**IMPORTANT**: For any type of content, even if the user requests something for a movie/game/book, the approach should still be sophisticated. Never lose sight of the idea that this should be art, not something that's cartoony or amateur.
+
+To create museum or magazine quality work, use the design philosophy as the foundation. Create one single page, highly visual, design-forward PDF or PNG output (unless asked for more pages). Generally use repeating patterns and perfect shapes. Treat the abstract philosophical design as if it were a scientific bible, borrowing the visual language of systematic observation—dense accumulation of marks, repeated elements, or layered patterns that build meaning through patient repetition and reward sustained viewing. Add sparse, clinical typography and systematic reference markers that suggest this could be a diagram from an imaginary discipline, treating the invisible subject with the same reverence typically reserved for documenting observable phenomena. Anchor the piece with simple phrase(s) or details positioned subtly, using a limited color palette that feels intentional and cohesive. Embrace the paradox of using analytical visual language to express ideas about human experience: the result should feel like an artifact that proves something ephemeral can be studied, mapped, and understood through careful attention. This is true art. 
+
+**Text as a contextual element**: Text is always minimal and visual-first, but let context guide whether that means whisper-quiet labels or bold typographic gestures. A punk venue poster might have larger, more aggressive type than a minimalist ceramics studio identity. Most of the time, font should be thin. All use of fonts must be design-forward and prioritize visual communication. Regardless of text scale, nothing falls off the page and nothing overlaps. Every element must be contained within the canvas boundaries with proper margins. Check carefully that all text, graphics, and visual elements have breathing room and clear separation. This is non-negotiable for professional execution. **IMPORTANT: Use different fonts if writing text. Search the `./canvas-fonts` directory. Regardless of approach, sophistication is non-negotiable.**
+
+Download and use whatever fonts are needed to make this a reality. Get creative by making the typography actually part of the art itself -- if the art is abstract, bring the font onto the canvas, not typeset digitally.
+
+To push boundaries, follow design instinct/intuition while using the philosophy as a guiding principle. Embrace ultimate design freedom and choice. Push aesthetics and design to the frontier. 
+
+**CRITICAL**: To achieve human-crafted quality (not AI-generated), create work that looks like it took countless hours. Make it appear as though someone at the absolute top of their field labored over every detail with painstaking care. Ensure the composition, spacing, color choices, typography - everything screams expert-level craftsmanship. Double-check that nothing overlaps, formatting is flawless, every detail perfect. Create something that could be shown to people to prove expertise and rank as undeniably impressive.
+
+Output the final result as a single, downloadable .pdf or .png file, alongside the design philosophy used as a .md file.
+
+---
+
+## FINAL STEP
+
+**IMPORTANT**: The user ALREADY said "It isn't perfect enough. It must be pristine, a masterpiece if craftsmanship, as if it were about to be displayed in a museum."
+
+**CRITICAL**: To refine the work, avoid adding more graphics; instead refine what has been created and make it extremely crisp, respecting the design philosophy and the principles of minimalism entirely. Rather than adding a fun filter or refactoring a font, consider how to make the existing composition more cohesive with the art. If the instinct is to call a new function or draw a new shape, STOP and instead ask: "How can I make what's already here more of a piece of art?"
+
+Take a second pass. Go back to the code and refine/polish further to make this a philosophically designed masterpiece.
+
+## MULTI-PAGE OPTION
+
+To create additional pages when requested, create more creative pages along the same lines as the design philosophy but distinctly different as well. Bundle those pages in the same .pdf or many .pngs. Treat the first page as just a single page in a whole coffee table book waiting to be filled. Make the next pages unique twists and memories of the original. Have them almost tell a story in a very tasteful way. Exercise full creative freedom.