@monoes/monomindcli 2.15.2 → 2.15.4

package/org-skills/swiftui-patterns/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+---
+name: swiftui-patterns
+description: "SwiftUI architecture patterns, state management with @Observable, view composition, navigation, performance optimization, and modern iOS/macOS UI best practices. Use when building or reviewing SwiftUI views, @Observable state, navigation, or render performance."
+tags: ["mobile","frontend"]
+tools: []
+license: MIT
+source: https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC
+source_path: "skills/swiftui-patterns"
+source_commit: bf70150eb2df8070024e5bdf08e4aa08959e2735
+---
+# SwiftUI Patterns
+
+Modern SwiftUI patterns for building declarative, performant user interfaces on Apple platforms. Covers the Observation framework, view composition, type-safe navigation, and performance optimization.
+
+## When to Activate
+
+- Building SwiftUI views and managing state (`@State`, `@Observable`, `@Binding`)
+- Designing navigation flows with `NavigationStack`
+- Structuring view models and data flow
+- Optimizing rendering performance for lists and complex layouts
+- Working with environment values and dependency injection in SwiftUI
+
+## State Management
+
+### Property Wrapper Selection
+
+Choose the simplest wrapper that fits:
+
+| Wrapper | Use Case |
+|---------|----------|
+| `@State` | View-local value types (toggles, form fields, sheet presentation) |
+| `@Binding` | Two-way reference to parent's `@State` |
+| `@Observable` class + `@State` | Owned model with multiple properties |
+| `@Observable` class (no wrapper) | Read-only reference passed from parent |
+| `@Bindable` | Two-way binding to an `@Observable` property |
+| `@Environment` | Shared dependencies injected via `.environment()` |
+
+### @Observable ViewModel
+
+Use `@Observable` (not `ObservableObject`) — it tracks property-level changes so SwiftUI only re-renders views that read the changed property:
+
+```swift
+@Observable
+final class ItemListViewModel {
+    private(set) var items: [Item] = []
+    private(set) var isLoading = false
+    var searchText = ""
+
+    private let repository: any ItemRepository
+
+    init(repository: any ItemRepository = DefaultItemRepository()) {
+        self.repository = repository
+    }
+
+    func load() async {
+        isLoading = true
+        defer { isLoading = false }
+        items = (try? await repository.fetchAll()) ?? []
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### View Consuming the ViewModel
+
+```swift
+struct ItemListView: View {
+    @State private var viewModel: ItemListViewModel
+
+    init(viewModel: ItemListViewModel = ItemListViewModel()) {
+        _viewModel = State(initialValue: viewModel)
+    }
+
+    var body: some View {
+        List(viewModel.items) { item in
+            ItemRow(item: item)
+        }
+        .searchable(text: $viewModel.searchText)
+        .overlay { if viewModel.isLoading { ProgressView() } }
+        .task { await viewModel.load() }
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### Environment Injection
+
+Replace `@EnvironmentObject` with `@Environment`:
+
+```swift
+// Inject
+ContentView()
+    .environment(authManager)
+
+// Consume
+struct ProfileView: View {
+    @Environment(AuthManager.self) private var auth
+
+    var body: some View {
+        Text(auth.currentUser?.name ?? "Guest")
+    }
+}
+```
+
+## View Composition
+
+### Extract Subviews to Limit Invalidation
+
+Break views into small, focused structs. When state changes, only the subview reading that state re-renders:
+
+```swift
+struct OrderView: View {
+    @State private var viewModel = OrderViewModel()
+
+    var body: some View {
+        VStack {
+            OrderHeader(title: viewModel.title)
+            OrderItemList(items: viewModel.items)
+            OrderTotal(total: viewModel.total)
+        }
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### ViewModifier for Reusable Styling
+
+```swift
+struct CardModifier: ViewModifier {
+    func body(content: Content) -> some View {
+        content
+            .padding()
+            .background(.regularMaterial)
+            .clipShape(RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 12))
+    }
+}
+
+extension View {
+    func cardStyle() -> some View {
+        modifier(CardModifier())
+    }
+}
+```
+
+## Navigation
+
+### Type-Safe NavigationStack
+
+Use `NavigationStack` with `NavigationPath` for programmatic, type-safe routing:
+
+```swift
+@Observable
+final class Router {
+    var path = NavigationPath()
+
+    func navigate(to destination: Destination) {
+        path.append(destination)
+    }
+
+    func popToRoot() {
+        path = NavigationPath()
+    }
+}
+
+enum Destination: Hashable {
+    case detail(Item.ID)
+    case settings
+    case profile(User.ID)
+}
+
+struct RootView: View {
+    @State private var router = Router()
+
+    var body: some View {
+        NavigationStack(path: $router.path) {
+            HomeView()
+                .navigationDestination(for: Destination.self) { dest in
+                    switch dest {
+                    case .detail(let id): ItemDetailView(itemID: id)
+                    case .settings: SettingsView()
+                    case .profile(let id): ProfileView(userID: id)
+                    }
+                }
+        }
+        .environment(router)
+    }
+}
+```
+
+## Performance
+
+### Use Lazy Containers for Large Collections
+
+`LazyVStack` and `LazyHStack` create views only when visible:
+
+```swift
+ScrollView {
+    LazyVStack(spacing: 8) {
+        ForEach(items) { item in
+            ItemRow(item: item)
+        }
+    }
+}
+```
+
+### Stable Identifiers
+
+Always use stable, unique IDs in `ForEach` — avoid using array indices:
+
+```swift
+// Use Identifiable conformance or explicit id
+ForEach(items, id: \.stableID) { item in
+    ItemRow(item: item)
+}
+```
+
+### Avoid Expensive Work in body
+
+- Never perform I/O, network calls, or heavy computation inside `body`
+- Use `.task {}` for async work — it cancels automatically when the view disappears
+- Use `.sensoryFeedback()` and `.geometryGroup()` sparingly in scroll views
+- Minimize `.shadow()`, `.blur()`, and `.mask()` in lists — they trigger offscreen rendering
+
+### Equatable Conformance
+
+For views with expensive bodies, conform to `Equatable` to skip unnecessary re-renders:
+
+```swift
+struct ExpensiveChartView: View, Equatable {
+    let dataPoints: [DataPoint] // DataPoint must conform to Equatable
+
+    static func == (lhs: Self, rhs: Self) -> Bool {
+        lhs.dataPoints == rhs.dataPoints
+    }
+
+    var body: some View {
+        // Complex chart rendering
+    }
+}
+```
+
+## Previews
+
+Use `#Preview` macro with inline mock data for fast iteration:
+
+```swift
+#Preview("Empty state") {
+    ItemListView(viewModel: ItemListViewModel(repository: EmptyMockRepository()))
+}
+
+#Preview("Loaded") {
+    ItemListView(viewModel: ItemListViewModel(repository: PopulatedMockRepository()))
+}
+```
+
+## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
+
+- Using `ObservableObject` / `@Published` / `@StateObject` / `@EnvironmentObject` in new code — migrate to `@Observable`
+- Putting async work directly in `body` or `init` — use `.task {}` or explicit load methods
+- Creating view models as `@State` inside child views that don't own the data — pass from parent instead
+- Using `AnyView` type erasure — prefer `@ViewBuilder` or `Group` for conditional views
+- Ignoring `Sendable` requirements when passing data to/from actors
+
+## References
+
+See skill: `swift-actor-persistence` for actor-based persistence patterns.
+See skill: `swift-protocol-di-testing` for protocol-based DI and testing with Swift Testing.

package/{dist/src/orgrt/role-skills/system-architect.md → org-skills/system-architect/SKILL.md}

@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+---
+name: system-architect
+description: "System Architect role best practices. Makes high-level technical and structural decisions — system boundaries, component interactions, and technology trade-offs — that other roles then implement against."
+tags: ["engineering"]
+tools: ["monograph_query","monograph_context","monograph_impact"]
+license: Apache-2.0
+source: https://github.com/monoes/monomind
+---
 # System Architect — Best Practices
 
 ## Focus

package/org-skills/systematic-debugging/LICENSE.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+MIT License
+
+Copyright (c) 2025 Jesse Vincent
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.

package/org-skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,288 @@
+---
+name: systematic-debugging
+description: "Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes"
+tags: ["engineering","testing"]
+tools: ["monograph_query","monograph_context","monograph_impact","monograph_suggest"]
+license: MIT
+source: https://github.com/obra/superpowers
+source_path: "skills/systematic-debugging"
+source_commit: 5bf4e78011075bcfc0dc295f0724994cd123ee71
+---
+# Systematic Debugging
+
+## Overview
+
+**Core principle:** ALWAYS find root cause before attempting fixes. Symptom fixes are failure.
+
+**Violating the letter of this process is violating the spirit of debugging.**
+
+## The Iron Law
+
+```
+NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST
+```
+
+If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose fixes.
+
+## When to Use
+
+Use for ANY technical issue:
+- Test failures
+- Bugs in production
+- Unexpected behavior
+- Performance problems
+- Build failures
+- Integration issues
+
+**Use this ESPECIALLY when:**
+- Under time pressure (emergencies make guessing tempting)
+- "Just one quick fix" seems obvious
+- You've already tried multiple fixes
+- Previous fix didn't work
+- You don't fully understand the issue
+
+**Don't skip when:**
+- Issue seems simple (simple bugs have root causes too)
+- You're in a hurry (rushing guarantees rework)
+- Manager wants it fixed NOW (systematic is faster than thrashing)
+
+## The Four Phases
+
+You MUST complete each phase before proceeding to the next.
+
+### Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation
+
+**BEFORE attempting ANY fix:**
+
+1. **Read Error Messages Carefully**
+   - Don't skip past errors or warnings
+   - They often contain the exact solution
+   - Read stack traces completely
+   - Note line numbers, file paths, error codes
+
+2. **Reproduce Consistently**
+   - Can you trigger it reliably?
+   - What are the exact steps?
+   - Does it happen every time?
+   - If not reproducible → gather more data, don't guess
+
+3. **Check Recent Changes**
+   - What changed that could cause this?
+   - Git diff, recent commits
+   - New dependencies, config changes
+   - Environmental differences
+
+4. **Gather Evidence in Multi-Component Systems**
+
+   **WHEN system has multiple components (CI → build → signing, API → service → database):**
+
+   **BEFORE proposing fixes, add diagnostic instrumentation:**
+   ```
+   For EACH component boundary:
+     - Log what data enters component
+     - Log what data exits component
+     - Verify environment/config propagation
+     - Check state at each layer
+
+   Run once to gather evidence showing WHERE it breaks
+   THEN analyze evidence to identify failing component
+   THEN investigate that specific component
+   ```
+
+   **Example (multi-layer system):**
+   ```bash
+   # Layer 1: Workflow
+   echo "=== Secrets available in workflow: ==="
+   echo "IDENTITY: ${IDENTITY:+SET}${IDENTITY:-UNSET}"
+
+   # Layer 2: Build script
+   echo "=== Env vars in build script: ==="
+   env | grep IDENTITY || echo "IDENTITY not in environment"
+
+   # Layer 3: Signing script
+   echo "=== Keychain state: ==="
+   security list-keychains
+   security find-identity -v
+
+   # Layer 4: Actual signing
+   codesign --sign "$IDENTITY" --verbose=4 "$APP"
+   ```
+
+   **This reveals:** Which layer fails (secrets → workflow ✓, workflow → build ✗)
+
+5. **Trace Data Flow**
+
+   **WHEN error is deep in call stack:**
+
+   See `root-cause-tracing.md` in this directory for the complete backward tracing technique.
+
+   **Quick version:**
+   - Where does bad value originate?
+   - What called this with bad value?
+   - Keep tracing up until you find the source
+   - Fix at source, not at symptom
+
+### Phase 2: Pattern Analysis
+
+**Find the pattern before fixing:**
+
+1. **Find Working Examples**
+   - Locate similar working code in same codebase
+   - What works that's similar to what's broken?
+
+2. **Compare Against References**
+   - If implementing pattern, read reference implementation COMPLETELY
+   - Don't skim - read every line
+   - Understand the pattern fully before applying
+
+3. **Identify Differences**
+   - What's different between working and broken?
+   - List every difference, however small
+   - Don't assume "that can't matter"
+
+4. **Understand Dependencies**
+   - What other components does this need?
+   - What settings, config, environment?
+   - What assumptions does it make?
+
+### Phase 3: Hypothesis and Testing
+
+**Scientific method:**
+
+1. **Form Single Hypothesis**
+   - State clearly: "I think X is the root cause because Y"
+   - Write it down
+   - Be specific, not vague
+
+2. **Test Minimally**
+   - Make the SMALLEST possible change to test hypothesis
+   - One variable at a time
+   - Don't fix multiple things at once
+
+3. **Verify Before Continuing**
+   - Did it work? Yes → Phase 4
+   - Didn't work? Form NEW hypothesis
+   - DON'T add more fixes on top
+
+4. **When You Don't Know**
+   - Say "I don't understand X"
+   - Don't pretend to know
+   - Ask for help
+   - Research more
+
+### Phase 4: Implementation
+
+**Fix the root cause, not the symptom:**
+
+1. **Create Failing Test Case**
+   - Simplest possible reproduction
+   - Automated test if possible
+   - One-off test script if no framework
+   - MUST have before fixing
+   - Use the `superpowers:test-driven-development` skill for writing proper failing tests
+
+2. **Implement Single Fix**
+   - Address the root cause identified
+   - ONE change at a time
+   - No "while I'm here" improvements
+   - No bundled refactoring
+
+3. **Verify Fix**
+   - Test passes now?
+   - No other tests broken?
+   - Issue actually resolved?
+   - Use the `superpowers:verification-before-completion` skill before claiming success
+
+4. **If Fix Doesn't Work**
+   - STOP
+   - Count: How many fixes have you tried?
+   - If < 3: Return to Phase 1, re-analyze with new information
+   - **If ≥ 3: STOP and question the architecture (step 5 below)**
+   - DON'T attempt Fix #4 without architectural discussion
+
+5. **If 3+ Fixes Failed: Question Architecture**
+
+   **Pattern indicating architectural problem:**
+   - Each fix reveals new shared state/coupling/problem in different place
+   - Fixes require "massive refactoring" to implement
+   - Each fix creates new symptoms elsewhere
+
+   **STOP and question fundamentals:**
+   - Is this pattern fundamentally sound?
+   - Are we "sticking with it through sheer inertia"?
+   - Should we refactor architecture vs. continue fixing symptoms?
+
+   **Discuss with your human partner before attempting more fixes**
+
+   This is NOT a failed hypothesis - this is a wrong architecture.
+
+## Red Flags - STOP and Follow Process
+
+If you catch yourself thinking:
+- "Quick fix for now, investigate later"
+- "Just try changing X and see if it works"
+- "Add multiple changes, run tests"
+- "Skip the test, I'll manually verify"
+- "It's probably X, let me fix that"
+- "I don't fully understand but this might work"
+- "Pattern says X but I'll adapt it differently"
+- "Here are the main problems: [lists fixes without investigation]"
+- Proposing solutions before tracing data flow
+- **"One more fix attempt" (when already tried 2+)**
+- **Each fix reveals new problem in different place**
+
+**ALL of these mean: STOP. Return to Phase 1.**
+
+**If 3+ fixes failed:** Question the architecture (see Phase 4.5)
+
+## your human partner's Signals You're Doing It Wrong
+
+**Watch for these redirections:**
+- "Is that not happening?" - You assumed without verifying
+- "Will it show us...?" - You should have added evidence gathering
+- "Stop guessing" - You're proposing fixes without understanding
+- "Ultra-think this" - Question fundamentals, not just symptoms
+- "We're stuck?" (frustrated) - Your approach isn't working
+
+**When you see these:** STOP. Return to Phase 1.
+
+## Common Rationalizations
+
+| Excuse | Reality |
+|--------|---------|
+| "Issue is simple, don't need process" | Simple issues have root causes too. Process is fast for simple bugs. |
+| "Emergency, no time for process" | Systematic debugging is FASTER than guess-and-check thrashing. |
+| "Just try this first, then investigate" | First fix sets the pattern. Do it right from the start. |
+| "I'll write test after confirming fix works" | Untested fixes don't stick. Test first proves it. |
+| "Multiple fixes at once saves time" | Can't isolate what worked. Causes new bugs. |
+| "Reference too long, I'll adapt the pattern" | Partial understanding guarantees bugs. Read it completely. |
+| "I see the problem, let me fix it" | Seeing symptoms ≠ understanding root cause. |
+| "One more fix attempt" (after 2+ failures) | 3+ failures = architectural problem. Question pattern, don't fix again. |
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+| Phase | Key Activities | Success Criteria |
+|-------|---------------|------------------|
+| **1. Root Cause** | Read errors, reproduce, check changes, gather evidence | Understand WHAT and WHY |
+| **2. Pattern** | Find working examples, compare | Identify differences |
+| **3. Hypothesis** | Form theory, test minimally | Confirmed or new hypothesis |
+| **4. Implementation** | Create test, fix, verify | Bug resolved, tests pass |
+
+## When Process Reveals "No Root Cause"
+
+If systematic investigation reveals issue is truly environmental, timing-dependent, or external:
+
+1. You've completed the process
+2. Document what you investigated
+3. Implement appropriate handling (retry, timeout, error message)
+4. Add monitoring/logging for future investigation
+
+**But:** 95% of "no root cause" cases are incomplete investigation.
+
+## Supporting Techniques
+
+These techniques are part of systematic debugging and available in this directory:
+
+- **`root-cause-tracing.md`** - Trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger
+- **`defense-in-depth.md`** - Add validation at multiple layers after finding root cause
+- **`condition-based-waiting.md`** - Replace arbitrary timeouts with condition polling

package/org-skills/systematic-debugging/condition-based-waiting.md

@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+# Condition-Based Waiting
+
+## Overview
+
+Flaky tests often guess at timing with arbitrary delays. This creates race conditions where tests pass on fast machines but fail under load or in CI.
+
+**Core principle:** Wait for the actual condition you care about, not a guess about how long it takes.
+
+## When to Use
+
+```dot
+digraph when_to_use {
+    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" [shape=diamond];
+    "Testing timing behavior?" [shape=diamond];
+    "Document WHY timeout needed" [shape=box];
+    "Use condition-based waiting" [shape=box];
+
+    "Test uses setTimeout/sleep?" -> "Testing timing behavior?" [label="yes"];
+    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Document WHY timeout needed" [label="yes"];
+    "Testing timing behavior?" -> "Use condition-based waiting" [label="no"];
+}
+```
+
+**Use when:**
+- Tests have arbitrary delays (`setTimeout`, `sleep`, `time.sleep()`)
+- Tests are flaky (pass sometimes, fail under load)
+- Tests timeout when run in parallel
+- Waiting for async operations to complete
+
+**Don't use when:**
+- Testing actual timing behavior (debounce, throttle intervals)
+- Always document WHY if using arbitrary timeout
+
+## Core Pattern
+
+```typescript
+// ❌ BEFORE: Guessing at timing
+await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 50));
+const result = getResult();
+expect(result).toBeDefined();
+
+// ✅ AFTER: Waiting for condition
+await waitFor(() => getResult() !== undefined);
+const result = getResult();
+expect(result).toBeDefined();
+```
+
+## Quick Patterns
+
+| Scenario | Pattern |
+|----------|---------|
+| Wait for event | `waitFor(() => events.find(e => e.type === 'DONE'))` |
+| Wait for state | `waitFor(() => machine.state === 'ready')` |
+| Wait for count | `waitFor(() => items.length >= 5)` |
+| Wait for file | `waitFor(() => fs.existsSync(path))` |
+| Complex condition | `waitFor(() => obj.ready && obj.value > 10)` |
+
+## Implementation
+
+Generic polling function:
+```typescript
+async function waitFor<T>(
+  condition: () => T | undefined | null | false,
+  description: string,
+  timeoutMs = 5000
+): Promise<T> {
+  const startTime = Date.now();
+
+  while (true) {
+    const result = condition();
+    if (result) return result;
+
+    if (Date.now() - startTime > timeoutMs) {
+      throw new Error(`Timeout waiting for ${description} after ${timeoutMs}ms`);
+    }
+
+    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 10)); // Poll every 10ms
+  }
+}
+```
+
+See `condition-based-waiting-example.ts` in this directory for complete implementation with domain-specific helpers (`waitForEvent`, `waitForEventCount`, `waitForEventMatch`) from actual debugging session.
+
+## Common Mistakes
+
+**❌ Polling too fast:** `setTimeout(check, 1)` - wastes CPU
+**✅ Fix:** Poll every 10ms
+
+**❌ No timeout:** Loop forever if condition never met
+**✅ Fix:** Always include timeout with clear error
+
+**❌ Stale data:** Cache state before loop
+**✅ Fix:** Call getter inside loop for fresh data
+
+## When Arbitrary Timeout IS Correct
+
+```typescript
+// Tool ticks every 100ms - need 2 ticks to verify partial output
+await waitForEvent(manager, 'TOOL_STARTED'); // First: wait for condition
+await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 200));   // Then: wait for timed behavior
+// 200ms = 2 ticks at 100ms intervals - documented and justified
+```
+
+**Requirements:**
+1. First wait for triggering condition
+2. Based on known timing (not guessing)
+3. Comment explaining WHY
+
+## Real-World Impact
+
+From debugging session (2025-10-03):
+- Fixed 15 flaky tests across 3 files
+- Pass rate: 60% → 100%
+- Execution time: 40% faster
+- No more race conditions