snappy 3.2__cp310-cp310-macosx_10_12_x86_64.whl

snappy/verify/krawczyk_shapes_engine.py

@@ -0,0 +1,518 @@
+from .. import snap
+from ..matrix import make_identity_matrix, make_matrix, make_vector
+
+from ..sage_helper import _within_sage, sage_method
+
+if _within_sage:
+    from ..sage_helper import ComplexDoubleField, ComplexIntervalField, RealIntervalField
+    from snappy.pari import prec_dec_to_bits
+
+__all__ = ['KrawczykShapesEngine']
+
+
+class KrawczykShapesEngine:
+
+    """
+    An engine that is initialized with an approximated candidate solution to
+    the rectangular gluing equations and produces intervals certified to
+    contain a true solution. After the engine is successfully run, the
+    resulting intervals are stored in certified_shapes which is a vector of
+    elements in a Sage's ComplexIntervalField.
+
+    A simple example to obtain certified shape intervals that uses the
+    KrawczykShapesEngine or IntervalNewtonShapesEngine under the hood::
+
+        sage: from snappy import Manifold
+        sage: M = Manifold("m015")
+        sage: M.tetrahedra_shapes('rect', bits_prec = 80, intervals = True) # doctest: +NUMERIC15 +NORMALIZE_WHITESPACE
+        [0.6623589786223730129805? + 0.5622795120623012438992?*I,
+         0.6623589786223730129805? + 0.5622795120623012438992?*I,
+         0.6623589786223730129805? + 0.5622795120623012438992?*I]
+
+    Its objective is thus the same as HIKMOT and it is certainly HIKMOT
+    inspired. However, it conceptually differs in that:
+
+    1. It uses complex numbers in it's computations.
+       We simply use Sage's complex interval type avoiding the need of
+       converting n x n complex matrices into 2n x 2n real matrices as
+       described Section 3.4 of the HIKMOT paper.
+
+    2. We avoid automatic differentiation.  We pick an independent set of
+       equations of the following form and try to solve them:
+
+               log(LHS) = 0
+
+       where
+
+               LHS =  c * z0^a0 * (1-z0)^b0 *  z1^a1 * (1-z1)^b1 * ...
+
+       with a, b and c's as returned by Manifold.gluing_equations('rect').
+
+       The derivative of log (LHS) with respect to zj is simply given by
+
+                            aj/zj - bj/(1-zj)
+
+       and thus no need for automatic differentiation.
+
+    3. For speed-up, the approximate inverse is always computed with
+       double's. Some intermediate matrix computations are performed sparsely.
+
+    In contrast to HIKMOT, we use and return Sage's native implementation of
+    (complex) interval arithmetic here, which allows for increased interoperability.
+    Another advantage is that Sage supports arbitrary precision.
+
+    Here is an example how to explicitly invoke the KrawczykShapesEngine::
+
+        sage: shapes = M.tetrahedra_shapes('rect', bits_prec = 80)
+        sage: C = KrawczykShapesEngine(M, shapes, bits_prec = 80)
+        sage: C.expand_until_certified()
+        True
+        sage: C.certified_shapes # doctest: +NUMERIC12
+        (0.6623589786223730129805? + 0.5622795120623012438992?*I, 0.6623589786223730129805? + 0.5622795120623012438992?*I, 0.6623589786223730129805? + 0.5622795120623012438992?*I)
+
+    And here an example where the initial solution is somewhat off::
+
+        sage: M = Manifold("m019")
+        sage: shapes = [0.780559+0.91449j, 0.780559+0.9144j, 0.46009+0.639j]
+        sage: C = KrawczykShapesEngine(M, shapes, bits_prec = 100)
+        sage: C.expand_until_certified()
+        True
+        sage: C.certified_shapes # doctest: +ELLIPSIS
+        (0.7806? + 0.9145?*I, 0.7806? + 0.9145?*I, 0.460...? + 0.6326?*I)
+
+    """
+
+    def log_gluing_LHSs(self, shapes):
+        """
+        Given the result of M.gluing_equations('rect') or a
+        subset of rows of it and shapes, return a vector of
+        log(LHS) where
+
+           LHS = c * z0 ** a0 * (1-z0) ** b0 * z1 ** a1 * ...
+
+        Let f: C^n -> C^n denote the function which takes
+        shapes and returns the vector of log(LHS).
+
+        The reason we take the logarithm of the rectangular
+        gluing equations is because the logarithmic derivative
+        is of a particular nice form::
+
+            sage: from snappy import Manifold
+            sage: M = Manifold("m019")
+            sage: equations = M.gluing_equations('rect')
+            sage: RIF = RealIntervalField(80)
+            sage: CIF = ComplexIntervalField(80)
+            sage: zero = CIF(0).center()
+            sage: shape1 = CIF(RIF(0.78055,0.78056), RIF(0.9144, 0.9145))
+            sage: shape2 = CIF(RIF(0.46002,0.46003), RIF(0.6326, 0.6327))
+
+        An interval solution containing the true solution. The log of each
+        rectangular equation should be 0 for the true solution, hence the interval
+        should contain zero::
+
+            sage: shapes = [shape1, shape1, shape2]
+            sage: C = KrawczykShapesEngine(M, [shape.center() for shape in shapes], bits_prec = 53)
+            sage: LHSs = C.log_gluing_LHSs(shapes)
+            sage: LHSs # doctest: +NUMERIC6
+            (0.000? + 0.000?*I, 0.000? + 0.000?*I, 0.0000? + 0.0000?*I)
+            sage: zero in LHSs[0]
+            True
+
+        An interval not containing the true solution::
+
+            sage: shapes = [shape1, shape1, shape1]
+            sage: LHSs = C.log_gluing_LHSs(shapes)
+            sage: LHSs # doctest: +NUMERIC3
+            (0.430? - 0.078?*I, 0.246? - 0.942?*I, 0.0000? + 0.0000?*I)
+            sage: zero in LHSs[0]
+            False
+
+        """
+
+        # Determine the field (should be ComplexField
+        # or ComplexIntervalField with some precision)
+        # of the shapes
+        BaseField = shapes[0].parent()
+
+        one = BaseField(1)
+        # The resulting vector as python list
+        gluing_LHSs = []
+        # Iterate through the rows of the result similar to
+        # M.gluing_equations('rect')
+        for A, B, c in self.equations:
+            # A and B are rows, c is an entry
+            # prod keeps the above product
+            prod = BaseField(c)
+            for a, b, shape in zip(A, B, shapes):
+                prod *= (shape ** a) * (one - shape) ** b
+
+            # Take log of the entire product
+            gluing_LHSs.append(prod.log())
+
+        return make_vector(gluing_LHSs, ring=BaseField)
+
+    def log_gluing_LHS_derivatives(self, shapes):
+        """
+        Compute the Jacobian of the vector-valued function f
+        described in the above log_gluing_LHSs::
+
+            sage: from snappy import Manifold
+            sage: M = Manifold("m019")
+            sage: shapes = M.tetrahedra_shapes('rect', bits_prec = 80)
+            sage: C = KrawczykShapesEngine(M, shapes, bits_prec = 80)
+            sage: RIF = RealIntervalField(80)
+            sage: CIF = ComplexIntervalField(80)
+            sage: shape1 = CIF(RIF(0.78055,0.78056), RIF(0.9144, 0.9145))
+            sage: shape2 = CIF(RIF(0.46002,0.46003), RIF(0.6326, 0.6327))
+            sage: shapes = [shape1, shape1, shape2]
+            sage: C.log_gluing_LHS_derivatives(shapes) # doctest: +NUMERIC3
+            [  0.292? - 1.6666?*I   0.292? - 1.6666?*I   0.752? - 1.0340?*I]
+            [ 0.5400? - 0.6327?*I  0.5400? - 0.6327?*I  -1.561? - 1.8290?*I]
+            [ 0.5400? - 0.6327?*I -0.5400? + 0.6327?*I                    0]
+
+        """
+
+        # Similar to log_gluing_LHS
+        BaseField = shapes[0].parent()
+        zero = BaseField(0)
+        one = BaseField(1)
+
+        # 1 /    z for each shape z
+        shape_inverses = [ one / shape for shape in shapes ]
+
+        # 1 / (1-z) for each shape z
+        one_minus_shape_inverses = [ one / (one - shape) for shape in shapes ]
+
+        gluing_LHS_derivatives = []
+        for A, B, c in self.equations:
+            row = []
+            for a, b, shape_inverse, one_minus_shape_inverse in zip(
+                A, B, shape_inverses, one_minus_shape_inverses):
+                # Equation for the derivative
+                #     derivative = (   a /      z -  b / (1-z) )
+                derivative = zero
+                if not a == 0:
+                    derivative = BaseField(int(a)) * shape_inverse
+                if not b == 0:
+                    derivative -= BaseField(int(b)) * one_minus_shape_inverse
+
+                row.append( derivative )
+
+            gluing_LHS_derivatives.append(row)
+
+        return make_matrix(gluing_LHS_derivatives, ring=BaseField)
+
+    def log_gluing_LHS_derivatives_sparse(self, shapes):
+        """
+        A column-sparse matrix version of log_gluing_LHS_derivatives_sparse.
+        The result is a list of list of pairs. Each list of pairs corresponds
+        to a column, a pair being (index of row, value) where the index is
+        increasing.
+        """
+
+        # Similar to log_gluing_LHS
+        BaseField = shapes[0].parent()
+        zero = BaseField(0)
+        one = BaseField(1)
+
+        gluing_LHS_derivatives = []
+
+        # For each shape z
+        for eqns_column, shape in zip(self.sparse_equations, shapes):
+            shape_inverse = one / shape
+            one_minus_shape_inverse = one / (one - shape)
+
+            # Compute the respective column
+            column = []
+            for r, (a, b) in eqns_column:
+                derivative = zero
+                if not a == 0:
+                    derivative = BaseField(int(a)) * shape_inverse
+                if not b == 0:
+                    derivative -= BaseField(int(b)) * one_minus_shape_inverse
+                column.append((r, derivative))
+            gluing_LHS_derivatives.append(column)
+        return gluing_LHS_derivatives
+
+    @staticmethod
+    def matrix_times_sparse(m, sparse_m):
+        """
+        Multiply a (dense) Sage matrix with a column-sparse matrix
+        (in the format described in log_gluing_LHS_derivatives_sparse).
+        """
+
+        CIF = m.base_ring()
+        zero = CIF(0)
+        rows = []
+        for row in m.rows():
+            result_row = []
+            for col in sparse_m:
+                v = zero
+                for r, d in col:
+                    v += d * row[r]
+                result_row.append(v)
+            rows.append(result_row)
+        return make_matrix(rows, ring=CIF)
+
+    @staticmethod
+    def interval_vector_mid_points(vec):
+        """
+        Given a vector of complex intervals, return the midpoints (as 0-length
+        complex intervals) of them.
+        """
+        # Should be ComplexIntervalField with the desired precision
+        BaseField = vec[0].parent()
+
+        return vec.apply_map(lambda shape: BaseField(shape.center()))
+
+    def krawczyk_interval(self, shape_intervals):
+        """
+        Compute the interval in the Krawczyk test.
+
+        It is given as
+
+            K(z0, [z], f) := z0 - c * f(z0) + (Id - c * df([z])) * ([z] - z0)
+
+        where
+           - z0 is the approximate candidate solution,
+           - [z] are the shape_intervals we try to verify,
+           - f is the function taking the shapes to the errors of the logarithmic gluing equations
+           - c is an approximate inverse of df
+           - df([z]) is the derivative of f (interval-)evaluated for [z]
+
+        Note that z0 in self.initial_shapes which are complex intervals
+        containing only one value (the candidate solution given initially).
+
+        If K is contained in [z], then we have proven that [z] contains a solution
+        to the gluing equations.
+
+        Do several Krawczyk operations to get a better solution::
+
+            sage: from sage.all import vector
+            sage: M = Manifold("m019")
+            sage: shapes = vector(ComplexIntervalField(53), [ 0.5+0.8j, 0.5+0.8j, 0.5+0.8j])
+            sage: for i in range(15):
+            ...       penultimateShapes = shapes
+            ...       centers = [ shape.center() for shape in shapes ]
+            ...       C = KrawczykShapesEngine(M, centers, bits_prec = 53)
+            ...       shapes = C.krawczyk_interval(shapes)
+            sage: shapes # doctest: +NUMERIC12
+            (0.78055252785073? + 0.91447366296773?*I, 0.780552527850725? + 0.91447366296773?*I, 0.460021175573718? + 0.632624193605256?*I)
+
+        """
+
+        # Compute df([z])
+        derivative = self.log_gluing_LHS_derivatives_sparse(shape_intervals)
+
+        # Compute c * df([z])
+        p = KrawczykShapesEngine.matrix_times_sparse(
+            self.approx_inverse, derivative)
+
+        # Compute Id - c * df([z])
+        diff = self.identity - p
+
+        # self.first_term is z0 - c * f(z0)
+
+        return (self.first_term
+                + diff * (shape_intervals - self.initial_shapes))
+
+    @staticmethod
+    def interval_vector_is_contained_in(vecA, vecB):
+        """
+        Given two vectors of intervals, return whether the first one
+        is contained in the second one.  Examples::
+
+            sage: RIF = RealIntervalField(80)
+            sage: CIF = ComplexIntervalField(80)
+            sage: box = CIF(RIF(-1,1),RIF(-1,1))
+            sage: a = [ CIF(0.1), CIF(1) + box ]
+            sage: b = [ CIF(0) + box, CIF(1) + 2 * box ]
+            sage: c = [ CIF(0), CIF(1) + 3 * box ]
+
+            sage: KrawczykShapesEngine.interval_vector_is_contained_in(a, b)
+            True
+            sage: KrawczykShapesEngine.interval_vector_is_contained_in(a, c)
+            False
+            sage: KrawczykShapesEngine.interval_vector_is_contained_in(b, a)
+            False
+            sage: KrawczykShapesEngine.interval_vector_is_contained_in(b, c)
+            False
+            sage: KrawczykShapesEngine.interval_vector_is_contained_in(c, a)
+            False
+            sage: KrawczykShapesEngine.interval_vector_is_contained_in(c, b)
+            False
+        """
+        return all((a in b) for a, b in zip(vecA, vecB))
+
+    @staticmethod
+    def interval_vector_union(vecA, vecB):
+        """
+        Given two vectors of intervals, return the vector of their unions,
+        i.e., the smallest interval containing both intervals.
+        """
+
+        return make_vector([a.union(b) for a, b in zip(vecA, vecB)])
+
+    @sage_method
+    def __init__(self, M, initial_shapes, bits_prec=None, dec_prec=None):
+        """
+        Initializes the KrawczykShapesEngine given an orientable SnapPy
+        Manifold M, approximated solutions initial_shapes to the
+        gluing equations (e.g., as returned by M.tetrahedra_shapes('rect'))
+        and the precision to be used for the desired computations in either
+        bits bits_prec or decimal digits dec_prec.
+
+        This requires Sage since it uses Sage's ComplexIntervalField for its
+        computations.
+
+        Note that this will choose an independent set of edge equations and
+        one equation per cusp. It is known that a solution to such a subset of
+        rectangular gluing equations is also a solution to the full set of
+        rectangular gluing equations::
+
+            sage: from snappy import Manifold
+            sage: M = Manifold("m019")
+
+            sage: C = KrawczykShapesEngine(M, M.tetrahedra_shapes('rect'), bits_prec = 53)
+            sage: C.expand_until_certified()
+            True
+            sage: C.certified_shapes # doctest: +ELLIPSIS
+            (0.780552527850...? + 0.914473662967...?*I, 0.780552527850...? + 0.91447366296773?*I, 0.4600211755737...? + 0.6326241936052...?*I)
+
+        Does not work with non-orientable manifolds::
+
+            sage: M = Manifold("m000")
+            sage: KrawczykShapesEngine(M, M.tetrahedra_shapes('rect'), bits_prec = 53)
+            Traceback (most recent call last):
+            ...
+            Exception: Manifold needs to be orientable
+
+
+        Or some non-hyperbolic manifolds::
+
+            sage: Manifold("t02333(1,0)").tetrahedra_shapes(intervals = True) # doctest: +SKIP
+            Traceback (most recent call last):
+            ...
+            RuntimeError: Could not certify shape intervals, either there are degenerate shapes or the precision must be increased.
+
+        """
+
+        # Convert to precision in bits if necessary
+        if dec_prec:
+            self.prec = prec_dec_to_bits(dec_prec)
+        elif bits_prec:
+            self.prec = bits_prec
+        else:
+            raise Exception("Need dec_prec or bits_prec")
+
+        # Setup interval types of desired precision
+        self.CIF = ComplexIntervalField(self.prec)
+        self.RIF = RealIntervalField(self.prec)
+
+        # Verify that manifold is orientable
+        if not M.is_orientable():
+            raise Exception("Manifold needs to be orientable")
+
+        # Initialize the shape intervals, they have zero length
+        self.initial_shapes = make_vector(
+            [self.CIF(shape) for shape in initial_shapes])
+
+        # Get an independent set of gluing equations from snap
+        self.equations = snap.shapes.enough_gluing_equations(M)
+        self._make_sparse_equations()
+
+        self.identity = make_identity_matrix(ring=self.CIF, n=len(self.initial_shapes))
+
+        CDF = ComplexDoubleField()
+
+        # Could be sparse
+        approx_deriv = self.log_gluing_LHS_derivatives(
+            [ CDF(shape) for shape in initial_shapes] )
+        approx_inverse_double = approx_deriv.inverse()
+        self.approx_inverse = approx_inverse_double.change_ring(self.CIF)
+
+        # Compute the term z0 - c * f(z0) in the formula for
+        # the Krawczyk interval K(z0, [z], f)
+
+        value_at_initial_shapes = self.log_gluing_LHSs(self.initial_shapes)
+
+        self.first_term = (self.initial_shapes
+                           - self.approx_inverse * value_at_initial_shapes)
+
+        # Shapes have not been certified yet
+        self.certified_shapes = None
+
+    def _make_sparse_equations(self):
+        num_eqns = len(self.equations)
+        self.sparse_equations = [ ]
+        for c in range(num_eqns):
+            column = []
+            for r in range(num_eqns):
+                A, B, dummy = self.equations[r]
+                a = A[c]
+                b = B[c]
+                if a != 0 or b != 0:
+                    column.append((r, (a,b)))
+            self.sparse_equations.append(column)
+
+    @staticmethod
+    def _expand_intervals_a_little(shapes):
+        """
+        Make the intervals a tiny bit larger.
+        """
+        return shapes.apply_map(lambda z: z + (z - z) / 64)
+
+    def expand_until_certified(self, verbose=False):
+        """
+        Try Krawczyk iterations (i.e., expanding the shape intervals [z]
+        by the Krawczyk interval K(z0, [z], f)) until we can certify they
+        contain a true solution.
+
+        If succeeded, return True and write certified shapes to
+        certified_shapes.
+        Set verbose = True for printing additional information.
+        """
+
+        # Initialize the interval shapes to be the initial shapes
+        shapes = self.initial_shapes
+
+        # Number of iterations we do before giving up.
+        # For double precision, give up quickly because failure to
+        # converge here most likely indicates we need to use higher
+        # precision.
+        num_iterations = (25 if self.prec > 53 else 11)
+
+        # Do several "Krawczyk" iterations
+        # I.e. compute the union of the current interval with the
+        # interval computed in the Krawczyk test
+        for i in range(num_iterations + 1):
+            # Remember the old shapes
+            old_shapes = shapes
+
+            # Do the Krawczyk test
+            shapes = self.krawczyk_interval(shapes)
+
+            # If the shapes are certified, set them, we are done
+            if KrawczykShapesEngine.interval_vector_is_contained_in(
+                            shapes, old_shapes):
+                if verbose:
+                    print("Certified shapes after %d iterations" % (i + 1))
+
+                self.certified_shapes = shapes
+                return True
+
+            # Expand the shape intervals by taking the union of the
+            # old and new shapes
+            shapes = KrawczykShapesEngine.interval_vector_union(
+                shapes, old_shapes)
+
+            # Make it much faster
+            if i == 0:
+                shapes = KrawczykShapesEngine._expand_intervals_a_little(
+                    shapes)
+
+        # After several iterations, still no certified shapes, give up.
+        if verbose:
+            print("Could not certify shapes")
+
+        return False

snappy/verify/maximal_cusp_area_matrix/__init__.py

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+from ...sage_helper import sage_method
+from ...matrix import matrix
+
+from .cusp_tiling_engine import *
+
+__all__ = ['legacy_verified_maximal_cusp_area_matrix']
+
+@sage_method
+def legacy_verified_maximal_cusp_area_matrix(snappy_manifold, bits_prec=None):
+    """
+    TESTS::
+
+        sage: from snappy import Manifold
+        sage: M = Manifold("s776")
+        sage: legacy_verified_maximal_cusp_area_matrix(M) # doctest: +NUMERIC6
+        [28.0000000000? 7.00000000000? 7.00000000000?]
+        [7.00000000000?  28.000000000? 7.00000000000?]
+        [7.00000000000? 7.00000000000?  28.000000000?]
+    """
+    hyperbolic, shapes = snappy_manifold.verify_hyperbolicity(
+        bits_prec=bits_prec)
+
+    if not hyperbolic:
+        raise Exception("Could not compute shape intervals for: "
+                        "triangulation does not hyperbolic structure or "
+                        "precision is insufficient")
+
+    C = CuspTilingEngine.from_manifold_and_shapes(snappy_manifold, shapes)
+    rows = [ C.compute_maximal_cusp_area_matrix_row(i)
+             for i in range(C.num_cusps) ]
+
+    for i in range(len(rows)):
+        for j in range(i + 1, len(rows)):
+            v = rows[i][j].intersection(rows[j][i])
+            rows[i][j] = v
+            rows[j][i] = v
+
+    return matrix(rows)
+
+def _doctest():
+    import doctest
+    doctest.testmod()
+
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+    _doctest()