aiox-core 5.0.4 → 5.0.5

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/workflows/wf-mind-research-loop.yaml

@@ -1,668 +0,0 @@
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# ⚠️  DEPRECATED - Use /mind-research instead
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-#
-# This workflow has been migrated to a modern SKILL.md format with:
-# - Teams Architecture (TeamCreate, TaskCreate, TaskUpdate)
-# - Parallel execution in Phase 3 (4 agents)
-# - Real specialist integration (@oalanicolas, @pedro-valerio)
-# - Enforced veto conditions
-# - Full Context Preamble
-#
-# NEW INVOCATION:
-#   /mind-research {domain} [--context "..."] [--must-include-local]
-#
-# NEW OUTPUT PATH:
-#   outputs/mind_research/{domain}/05-final-report.md
-#
-# Deprecated: 2026-02-06
-# Replacement: ~/.claude/skills/mind-research/SKILL.md
-#
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# WORKFLOW: Mind Research Loop (LEGACY)
-# Version: 2.1.0
-# Purpose: Research and validate the world's best minds for any domain
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-workflow-id: wf-mind-research-loop
-name: Mind Research Loop
-version: 2.1.0
-estimated-time: 15-30 minutes
-complexity: medium
-
-description: |
-  Research and validate the world's best minds for any domain through
-  iterative loop with self-criticism (devil's advocate).
-
-  Core Philosophy:
-  - People with skin in the game > Generic AI bots
-  - Real consequences = Battle-tested frameworks
-  - Clone elite minds = Guaranteed quality
-
-  FUNDAMENTAL RULE:
-  It doesn't matter if someone is "the best in the world" if there's
-  no documented process we can replicate.
-
-orchestrator: "@squad-chief"
-mode: YOLO  # 100% autonomous, executes all iterations
-
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# SPECIALIST AGENTS
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-specialists:
-  mind_cloning:
-    agent: "@oalanicolas"
-    role: "Mind Cloning Architect"
-    responsibilities:
-      - "DNA extraction and source validation"
-      - "Source quality classification (gold vs bronze)"
-    invoke_for:
-      - "Phase: Source Collection"
-      - "Phase: DNA Extraction"
-
-  process_validation:
-    agent: "@pedro-valerio"
-    role: "Process Absolutist"
-    responsibilities:
-      - "Workflow checkpoint validation"
-      - "Quality gate design"
-    invoke_for:
-      - "Phase: Workflow Checkpoints"
-
-specialist_handoffs:
-  - phase: "Source Collection"
-    invoke: "@oalanicolas *assess-sources"
-    context: "Pass discovered sources for quality classification"
-
-  - phase: "DNA Extraction"
-    invoke: "@oalanicolas *extract-dna"
-    context: "Pass validated sources + mind profile"
-
-  - phase: "Workflow Checkpoints"
-    invoke: "@pedro-valerio *audit"
-    context: "Validate quality gates are properly blocking"
-
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# FRAMEWORKS USED
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-frameworks:
-  - id: tier-system-framework
-    file: "data/tier-system-framework.md"
-    usage: "Classify minds by tier (Iteration 3, Final)"
-
-  - id: quality-dimensions-framework
-    file: "data/quality-dimensions-framework.md"
-    usage: "Score each mind (Iteration 3)"
-
-  - id: decision-heuristics-framework
-    file: "data/decision-heuristics-framework.md"
-    usage: "Cut/Keep heuristics (Iteration 2, 3)"
-
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# INPUTS
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-inputs:
-  - name: domain
-    type: string
-    required: true
-    description: "Area of expertise"
-    examples:
-      - "copywriting"
-      - "tax-law"
-      - "hr"
-
-  - name: context
-    type: string
-    required: false
-    description: "Additional context"
-    examples:
-      - "for Brazilian startups"
-
-  - name: must_include_local
-    type: boolean
-    required: false
-    default: false
-    description: "Include local/regional minds"
-
-  - name: specific_needs
-    type: array
-    required: false
-    description: "Specific needs within domain"
-    examples:
-      - ["contracts", "tax"]
-
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# OUTPUTS
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-outputs:
-  primary:
-    - name: "mind_research_report"
-      format: "markdown"
-      path: "outputs/research/{domain}-minds-research.md"
-      description: "Complete research report with curated minds"
-
-  artifacts:
-    - "Initial mapping (15-20 names)"
-    - "Devil's advocate refinement (10-12 names)"
-    - "Framework validation (6-8 names)"
-    - "Final elite list (3-5 names with tier assignments)"
-
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# PHASES
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-phases:
-  # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-  - id: ITERATION-1
-    name: "Broad Research"
-    tier: 0
-    mandatory: true
-    description: |
-      Map the universe of experts in the domain.
-      Generate initial list of 15-20 names.
-
-    research_queries:
-      - "best {domain} experts thought leaders"
-      - "top {domain} consultants frameworks"
-      - "most influential {domain} professionals"
-      - "{domain} methodology creators founders"
-      - "best {domain} books authors"
-      # If must_include_local:
-      - "best {domain} Brazil specialists"
-      - "{domain} Brazilian reference experts"
-
-    extract_per_result:
-      - name: "Expert name"
-      - title: "Known title/position"
-      - known_for: "What they're known for"
-      - has_framework: "Has own framework/methodology? (yes/no/unknown)"
-      - sources_found: "Which sources mention this person"
-
-    output_format: |
-      ## Iteration 1: Initial Mapping
-
-      ### Broad List (15-20 names)
-      | # | Name | Known for | Framework? | Sources |
-      |---|------|-----------|------------|---------|
-      | 1 | Expert A | X methodology | Yes | 5 sources |
-      ...
-
-      ### Observations
-      - {patterns identified}
-      - {gaps in research}
-
-    checkpoint:
-      criteria:
-        - "At least 15 names identified"
-        - "Each name has sources documented"
-      human_review: false
-
-  # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-  - id: ITERATION-2
-    name: "Devil's Advocate"
-    tier: 1
-    mandatory: true
-    description: |
-      Question your own research, find who's missing.
-      Apply self-criticism to refine to 10-12 names.
-
-    research_queries:
-      - "critics of {expert_names} methodology"
-      - "alternatives to {popular_framework}"
-      - "{domain} contrarian experts different approach"
-      - "underrated {domain} experts hidden gems"
-      - "who disagrees with {top_expert} {domain}"
-      - "{domain} experts not famous but effective"
-
-    self_questioning:
-      - "Why {Expert A} and not {Expert B}?"
-      - "Who would criticize this list? Why?"
-      - "Who are the contrarians in {domain}?"
-      - "Who is doing innovative work but isn't famous yet?"
-      - "Is the list too American/Eurocentric?"
-      - "Is any niche underrepresented?"
-
-    heuristic:
-      id: "SC_DA_001"
-      name: "Devil's Advocate Cut/Keep"
-      from_framework: "decision-heuristics-framework"
-
-      weights:
-        source_mentions: 0.8
-        original_work: 0.9
-        practical_results: 0.9
-        framework_documented: 1.0  # VETO power
-
-      thresholds:
-        source_mentions: 3
-        original_work: true
-        practical_results: true
-
-      veto_conditions:
-        - condition: "source_mentions < 2"
-          action: "CUT - Insufficient validation"
-        - condition: "is_only_influencer = true"
-          action: "CUT - No deep work"
-        - condition: "no_practical_results = true"
-          action: "CUT - Theory only"
-
-      decision_tree: |
-        IF sources < 2 → CUT (insufficient validation)
-        ELSE IF is_popularizer_only → CUT (no original work)
-        ELSE IF no_practical_evidence → REVIEW (needs more research)
-        ELSE → KEEP (proceed to Iteration 3)
-
-    cut_criteria:
-      keep_if:
-        - "Mentioned in multiple sources (>=3)"
-        - "Has original work (not just a popularizer)"
-        - "Active practitioner (not just theorist)"
-      cut_if:
-        - "Only appears in 1 source"
-        - "Is just an 'influencer' without deep work"
-        - "No evidence of practical results"
-
-    output_format: |
-      ## Iteration 2: Devil's Advocate
-
-      ### Names Added (weren't in initial list)
-      | Name | Why they were missing | Relevance |
-
-      ### Names Questioned
-      | Name | Questioning | Decision |
-
-      ### Refined List (10-12 names)
-
-    checkpoint:
-      criteria:
-        - "Self-questioning applied to all names"
-        - "At least 2 names added from devil's advocate"
-        - "Refined to 10-12 names with justifications"
-      human_review: false
-
-  # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-  - id: ITERATION-3
-    name: "Framework Validation"
-    tier: 2
-    mandatory: true
-    description: |
-      Ensure each name has REPLICABLE DOCUMENTATION.
-      Apply quality dimensions and tier classification.
-      Refine to 6-8 names.
-
-    frameworks_applied:
-      - "quality-dimensions-framework.md"
-      - "tier-system-framework.md"
-      - "decision-heuristics-framework.md"
-
-    quality_dimensions:
-      accuracy:
-        weight: 1.0
-        threshold: 7.0
-        veto_power: true
-        check: "Are their claims verified by results/case studies?"
-
-      coherence:
-        weight: 0.9
-        threshold: 6.0
-        check: "Is their methodology internally consistent?"
-
-      operational_excellence:
-        weight: 0.9
-        threshold: 6.0
-        check: "Is the process documented and replicable?"
-
-      innovation_capacity:
-        weight: 0.7
-        threshold: 5.0
-        check: "Did they create original frameworks?"
-
-      stakeholder_value:
-        weight: 0.8
-        threshold: 6.0
-        check: "Do they deliver proven results?"
-
-      scoring:
-        method: "weighted_average"
-        pass_threshold: 7.0
-        per_dimension_min: 5.0
-
-    tier_classification:
-      tier_0_diagnosis:
-        indicators:
-          - "Creates diagnostic/audit frameworks"
-          - "Establishes baseline before action"
-          - "Analytical focus"
-        examples: "Auditors, analysts, diagnosticians"
-
-      tier_1_masters:
-        indicators:
-          - "Proven track record ($XXM+ results)"
-          - "Original methodology"
-          - "Deep expertise, not just popular"
-        examples: "Domain masters with documented results"
-
-      tier_2_systematizers:
-        indicators:
-          - "Creates teachable frameworks"
-          - "Process-oriented thinking"
-          - "Methodology developers"
-        examples: "Framework creators, educators"
-
-      tier_3_specialists:
-        indicators:
-          - "Format/channel specific expertise"
-          - "Applied specialization"
-        examples: "VSL specialist, email specialist"
-
-    mandatory_criteria:
-      must_have_all:
-        - framework_documented: "Has methodology/framework with own name?"
-        - process_extractable: "Is there a documented step-by-step process?"
-        - artifacts_available: "Has extractable templates, checklists, frameworks?"
-        - examples_exist: "Are there application examples?"
-        - material_accessible: "Is the material accessible (books, courses, articles)?"
-
-    validation_queries:
-      - "{expert_name} methodology framework"
-      - "{expert_name} process step by step"
-      - "{expert_name} book template checklist"
-      - "{expert_name} case study results"
-
-    heuristic:
-      id: "SC_FV_001"
-      name: "Framework Validation Gate"
-      from_framework: "decision-heuristics-framework"
-
-      weights:
-        framework_documented: 1.0  # VETO power
-        process_extractable: 0.9
-        artifacts_available: 0.8
-        examples_exist: 0.8
-        material_accessible: 0.7
-
-      veto_conditions:
-        - condition: "framework_documented < 2"
-          action: "VETO - No replicable methodology"
-        - condition: "total_score < 10"
-          action: "VETO - Insufficient documentation"
-
-      decision_tree: |
-        IF framework_documented == 0 → VETO (no methodology)
-        ELSE IF total_score < 10 → VETO (insufficient docs)
-        ELSE IF total_score >= 12 → APPROVE (excellent)
-        ELSE → APPROVE (acceptable)
-
-    scoring:
-      framework_documented: "0-3 (0=no, 1=partial, 2=yes, 3=excellent)"
-      process_extractable: "0-3"
-      artifacts_available: "0-3"
-      examples_exist: "0-3"
-      material_accessible: "0-3"
-      minimum_total: "10/15"
-      ideal_total: "12+/15"
-
-    output_format: |
-      ## Iteration 3: Framework Validation
-
-      ### Detailed Assessment
-      | Expert | Framework | Process | Artifacts | Examples | Access | TOTAL | Tier | Status |
-      |--------|-----------|---------|-----------|----------|--------|-------|------|--------|
-
-      ### Tier Distribution
-      - Tier 0 (Diagnosis): {names}
-      - Tier 1 (Masters): {names}
-      - Tier 2 (Systematizers): {names}
-
-      ### Cut Due to Lack of Documentation
-      | Expert | Reason | Veto Condition |
-
-    checkpoint:
-      criteria:
-        - "Each mind scored against quality dimensions"
-        - "Each passing mind assigned to tier"
-        - "Refined to 6-8 names"
-        - "Tier 0 has at least 1 mind (diagnostic)"
-      human_review: false
-
-  # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-  - id: ITERATION-4
-    name: "Cross-Reference"
-    tier: 2
-    mandatory: false
-    condition: "Still more than 6 names or doubts remain"
-    description: |
-      Validate through multiple perspectives.
-      Verify reputation and check for obvious omissions.
-
-    cross_checks:
-      - "Appears in 'best of' lists from multiple sources?"
-      - "Cited by other domain experts?"
-      - "Has verifiable track record?"
-      - "Results are verifiable?"
-
-    final_questions:
-      - "Did we miss anyone obvious that any domain expert would mention?"
-      - "Does the list cover different approaches/schools in the domain?"
-      - "Is there sufficient diversity (geographic, approach)?"
-
-    checkpoint:
-      criteria:
-        - "Cross-reference validation complete"
-        - "No obvious omissions"
-      human_review: false
-
-  # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-  - id: ITERATION-5
-    name: "Final Elite"
-    tier: 3
-    mandatory: false
-    condition: "Still more than 5 names"
-    description: |
-      Select the final team based on material availability.
-      Apply tiebreakers if needed.
-
-    tiebreakers:
-      - "Who has the most documented material?"
-      - "Who has the most recent success cases?"
-      - "Who has the most complete framework?"
-      - "Who best complements others on the list?"
-
-    checkpoint:
-      criteria:
-        - "Final elite list of 3-5 minds"
-        - "Each mind has tier assignment"
-        - "Documentation available for each"
-      human_review: true
-      message: |
-        Please review the final elite list.
-        These are the minds that will be cloned for the squad.
-
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# FINAL OUTPUT
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-final_output:
-  format: markdown
-  template: |
-    # Mind Research Report: {Domain}
-
-    **Generated:** {date}
-    **Domain:** {domain}
-    **Context:** {context}
-    **Iterations executed:** {3-5}
-
-    ---
-
-    ## Executive Summary
-    {Paragraph summarizing research and conclusions}
-
-    ---
-
-    ## Final Elite: {N} Selected Minds
-
-    ### Tier Distribution
-    | Tier | Minds | Role |
-    |------|-------|------|
-    | Tier 0 | {names} | Diagnosis/Audit - ALWAYS first |
-    | Tier 1 | {names} | Core Masters - Primary execution |
-    | Tier 2 | {names} | Systematizers - Frameworks |
-    | Tier 3 | {names} | Specialists - Format-specific |
-
-    ---
-
-    ### 1. {Expert Name}
-    - **Tier:** {0|1|2|3}
-    - **Known for:** {description}
-    - **Main Framework:** {framework name}
-    - **Why include:** {justification}
-    - **Quality Score:** {X}/10
-    - **Documentation Score:** {X}/15
-    - **Available Material:**
-      - {book/course/article 1}
-      - {book/course/article 2}
-
-    ...
-
-    ---
-
-    ## Minds Considered but Not Selected
-    | Expert | Reason for Exclusion |
-
-    ---
-
-    ## Next Steps
-    For each selected mind, execute:
-    1. `wf-clone-mind.yaml` - Clone mind DNA
-    2. `create-agent.md` - Create agent from DNA
-
-    ---
-
-    ## Research Metadata
-    | Metric | Value |
-    |--------|-------|
-    | Initial names mapped | {N} |
-    | After devil's advocate | {N} |
-    | After framework validation | {N} |
-    | Final elite | {N} |
-    | Iterations executed | {N} |
-
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# EXECUTION RULES
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-execution_rules:
-  always:
-    - "Execute MINIMUM 3 iterations"
-    - "Question your own research in each iteration"
-    - "Validate existence of DOCUMENTED FRAMEWORK"
-    - "Justify each inclusion and exclusion"
-    - "Seek diversity of approaches"
-
-  never:
-    - "Accept names without validating frameworks"
-    - "Trust only memory/prior knowledge"
-    - "Skip the devil's advocate iteration"
-    - "Keep a name just because they're famous"
-    - "Stop before 3 iterations"
-
-  absolute_cut_criterion: |
-    "Is there sufficient documentation of this person's processes
-    for an agent to replicate the method?"
-
-    - YES → Continues
-    - NO → Cut, no matter how famous they are
-
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# QUALITY GUARANTEES
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-quality_guarantees:
-  - "Minimum 3 iterations MANDATORY"
-  - "Maximum 5 iterations if necessary"
-  - "Each iteration QUESTIONS the previous one"
-  - "Only those with DOCUMENTED FRAMEWORKS pass"
-  - "Tier distribution ensures diagnostic capability (Tier 0)"
-
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# INTEGRATION
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-integration:
-  executed_by:
-    - "squad-chief.md when user requests squad in new domain"
-
-  feeds_into:
-    - workflow: "wf-clone-mind.yaml"
-      context: "List of minds to clone"
-    - task: "create-agent.md"
-      context: "Data for each mind"
-
-  complete_flow: |
-    mind-research-loop (this)
-        ↓
-    [For each selected mind]
-        ↓
-    wf-clone-mind.yaml
-        ↓
-    create-agent.md
-        ↓
-    Complete squad with cloned minds
-
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# USAGE EXAMPLES
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-examples:
-  - name: "Copywriting Squad"
-    input:
-      domain: "copywriting"
-      context: "for info-product sales"
-      must_include_local: false
-    flow:
-      iteration_1: "18 names mapped (Halbert, Ogilvy, Hopkins, etc.)"
-      iteration_2: "12 names after questioning (removed influencers without framework)"
-      iteration_3: "8 names with documented frameworks"
-      final: "6 elite minds (Halbert, Ogilvy, Schwartz, Kennedy, Bencivenga, Sugarman)"
-
-  - name: "Brazilian Legal Squad"
-    input:
-      domain: "corporate and tax law"
-      context: "for Brazilian startups"
-      must_include_local: true
-      specific_needs: ["contracts", "tax", "corporate"]
-    flow:
-      iteration_1: "15 names (global + Brazilian mix)"
-      iteration_2: "10 names (added lesser-known Brazilian specialists)"
-      iteration_3: "6 names with frameworks (cut theorists without methodology)"
-      final: "5 minds (3 Brazilian + 2 global with applicable frameworks)"
-
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-# METADATA
-# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-
-metadata:
-  version: "2.1.0"
-  migrated_from: "mind-research-loop.md"
-  migration_date: "2026-02-05"
-  created: "2026-01-25"
-  updated: "2026-02-05"
-  author: "Squad Architect"
-  changelog:
-    - version: "2.1.0"
-      date: "2026-02-05"
-      changes:
-        - "Migrated from .md to .yaml format"
-        - "Structured phases with formal checkpoints"
-        - "Added explicit heuristic references"
-    - version: "2.0.0"
-      date: "2026-02-01"
-      changes:
-        - "Integrated decision-heuristics-framework.md in Iteration 2 (SC_DA_001)"
-        - "Integrated quality-dimensions-framework.md in Iteration 3"
-        - "Integrated tier-system-framework.md in Iteration 3"
-        - "Added tier distribution to final output"