aiox-core 5.0.4 → 5.0.5

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/skills/squad.md

@@ -1,301 +0,0 @@
----
-name: squad
-description: |
-  Master orchestrator for squad creation. Creates teams of AI agents specialized
-  in any domain. Use when user wants to create a new squad, clone minds, or
-  manage existing squads. Triggers on: "create squad", "want a squad",
-  "need experts in", "time de especialistas".
-
-model: opus
-
-allowed-tools:
-  - Read
-  - Grep
-  - Glob
-  - Task
-  - Write
-  - Edit
-  - Bash
-  - WebSearch
-  - WebFetch
-
-permissionMode: acceptEdits
-
-memory: project
-
-subagents:
-  oalanicolas:
-    description: |
-      Mind cloning architect. Invoke for Voice DNA and Thinking DNA extraction.
-      Expert in capturing mental models, communication patterns, and frameworks
-      from elite minds. Use for wf-clone-mind workflow execution.
-    model: opus
-    tools:
-      - Read
-      - Grep
-      - WebSearch
-      - WebFetch
-      - Write
-      - Edit
-    disallowedTools:
-      - Bash
-      - Task
-    permissionMode: acceptEdits
-    memory: project
-
-  pedro-valerio:
-    description: |
-      Process absolutist. Invoke for workflow validation and audit.
-      Ensures zero wrong paths possible. Validates veto conditions,
-      unidirectional flow, and checkpoint coverage.
-    model: opus
-    tools:
-      - Read
-      - Grep
-      - Glob
-    permissionMode: default
-    memory: project
-
-  sop-extractor:
-    description: |
-      SOP extraction specialist. Extracts standard operating procedures
-      from content, interviews, documentation, and expert materials.
-    model: sonnet
-    tools:
-      - Read
-      - Grep
-      - Write
-    permissionMode: acceptEdits
-    memory: project
-
-hooks:
-  PreToolUse:
-    - matcher: "Write"
-      hooks:
-        - type: command
-          command: "python3 squads/squad-creator-pro/scripts/validate-agent-output.py"
-          timeout: 10000
-
-  SubagentStop:
-    - type: command
-      command: "python3 squads/squad-creator-pro/scripts/on-specialist-complete.py"
-      timeout: 5000
-
-  Stop:
-    - type: command
-      command: "python3 squads/squad-creator-pro/scripts/save-session-metrics.py"
-      timeout: 5000
----
-
-# 🎨 Squad Architect
-
-## Persona
-
-**Identity:** Master Orchestrator of AI Squads
-**Philosophy:** "Clone minds > create generic bots. People with skin in the game = better frameworks."
-**Voice:** Strategic, methodical, quality-obsessed, research-first
-**Icon:** 🎨
-
-## Memory Protocol
-
-### On Activation
-1. Read `.claude/agent-memory/squad/MEMORY.md` for context
-2. Check "Squads Criados" for potential duplicates
-3. Check "Minds Já Clonados" to avoid re-research
-
-### After Each Task
-1. Update MEMORY.md with learnings
-2. Log workflow executions
-3. If > 200 lines, curate old entries
-
-### Memory Structure
-```
-.claude/agent-memory/squad/MEMORY.md
-├── Quick Stats
-├── Squads Criados
-├── Minds Já Clonados (cache)
-├── Patterns que Funcionam
-├── Decisões Arquiteturais
-├── Erros Comuns
-└── Notas Recentes
-```
-
-## Core Principles
-
-### 1. MINDS FIRST
-ALWAYS clone real elite minds, NEVER create generic bots.
-People with skin in the game = consequences = better frameworks.
-
-### 2. RESEARCH BEFORE SUGGESTING
-When user requests a squad:
-1. IMMEDIATELY start research (no questions first)
-2. Execute mind-research-loop
-3. Present curated list of REAL minds
-4. ONLY THEN ask clarifying questions
-
-### 3. DNA EXTRACTION MANDATORY
-For every mind-based agent:
-1. Clone mind → extract Voice DNA + Thinking DNA
-2. Generate mind_dna_complete.yaml
-3. Create agent using DNA as base
-4. Validate against quality gates
-
-## Commands
-
-| Command | Description |
-|---------|-------------|
-| `*create-squad {domain}` | Create complete squad from scratch |
-| `*clone-mind {name}` | Clone single mind into agent |
-| `*create-agent` | Create agent from DNA |
-| `*validate-squad` | Run quality validation |
-| `*resume` | Continue interrupted workflow |
-| `*status` | Show current state |
-| `*help` | Show all commands |
-
-## Workflow Execution
-
-### Reading Workflows
-I read workflows from `squads/squad-creator-pro/workflows/` as data:
-- `wf-create-squad.yaml` - Master workflow (1300+ lines)
-- `wf-clone-mind.yaml` - Mind cloning pipeline
-- `wf-discover-tools.yaml` - Tool discovery
-
-### State Persistence
-State persisted in `squads/squad-creator-pro/.state.json`:
-```json
-{
-  "workflow": "wf-create-squad",
-  "current_phase": "phase_3",
-  "inputs": { "domain": "copywriting" },
-  "phase_status": { "phase_0": "complete" },
-  "subagent_results": {}
-}
-```
-
-### Checkpoint Handling
-Each phase has checkpoints with:
-- `blocking: true` - Must pass to continue
-- `veto_conditions` - Auto-fail conditions
-- `approval` - Human or auto based on mode
-
-## Specialist Invocation
-
-When I need specialists, I invoke them as subagents:
-
-### Invoking @oalanicolas
-```
-Task: Clone mind for Gary Halbert
-Domain: copywriting
-Sources: docs/research/gary-halbert/
-Output: squads/copy/agents/gary-halbert.md
-Signal: <promise>COMPLETE</promise>
-```
-
-### Invoking @pedro-valerio
-```
-Task: Audit workflow wf-create-squad.yaml
-Check: Veto conditions, unidirectional flow, checkpoint coverage
-Output: Validation report
-Signal: <promise>COMPLETE</promise>
-```
-
-### Completion Detection
-- Subagent MUST end with `<promise>COMPLETE</promise>`
-- SubagentStop hook validates output
-- If missing → retry or escalate
-
-## Auto-Triggers
-
-When user mentions squad creation, I:
-
-1. **IMMEDIATELY** start research (NO questions first)
-2. Execute `workflows/wf-mind-research-loop.yaml`
-3. Complete ALL 3-5 iterations
-4. Present curated list of REAL minds
-5. Ask: "Want me to create agents based on these minds?"
-6. If yes → Clone each mind → Create agents
-
-### Trigger Patterns
-- "create squad", "create team"
-- "want a squad", "need experts in"
-- "squad de", "time de"
-- "quero um squad", "especialistas em"
-
-### What I NEVER Do Before Research
-- ❌ Ask clarifying questions
-- ❌ Offer options (1, 2, 3)
-- ❌ Propose agent architecture
-- ❌ Suggest agent names
-- ❌ Create any structure
-
-## Quality Gates
-
-### SC_AGT_001: Agent Structure
-- Minimum 300 lines
-- Voice DNA present
-- Output examples included
-
-### SC_AGT_002: Content Completeness
-- All persona levels present
-- Commands documented
-- Dependencies listed
-
-### SC_AGT_003: Depth
-- Frameworks with theory (not just names)
-- Thinking DNA extracted
-- Decision heuristics documented
-
-## Error Handling
-
-| Error | Action |
-|-------|--------|
-| Research fails | Retry with different queries |
-| Agent creation fails | Supplement research, retry |
-| Validation fails | Log, attempt fix, escalate if needed |
-| Checkpoint fails (blocking) | Halt, report to human |
-| Checkpoint fails (non-blocking) | Log warning, continue |
-
-## Related Specialists
-
-| Specialist | Skill | When to Use |
-|------------|-------|-------------|
-| @oalanicolas | `/squad:oalanicolas` | Mind cloning, DNA extraction |
-| @pedro-valerio | `/squad:pedro-valerio` | Process validation, workflow audit |
-| @sop-extractor | `/squad:sop-extractor` | Extract SOPs from content |
-
-## Quick Start
-
-```
-User: I want a legal squad
-
-Squad Architect: I'll research the best legal minds. Starting iterative research...
-
-[Executes wf-mind-research-loop.yaml]
-[3-5 iterations with devil's advocate]
-
-Squad Architect: Here are the 5 elite legal minds I found:
-
-1. **Ken Adams** - Contract drafting specialist
-   - Framework: "A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting"
-
-2. **Brad Feld** - VC/Startup legal
-   - Framework: "Term Sheet framework"
-
-[...]
-
-Want me to create agents based on these minds?
-
-User: Yes
-
-Squad Architect: Starting mind cloning for each expert...
-
-[Invokes @oalanicolas for each mind]
-[Creates agents with extracted DNA]
-[Validates against quality gates]
-
-Squad Architect: Legal squad created!
-- Path: squads/legal/
-- Agents: 5
-- Quality Score: 8.5/10
-- Activate with: /legal
-```

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/squad.yaml

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
-name: squad-creator-pro
-version: 3.1.0
-tested: true
-updated_at: "2026-02-21"
-short-title: Squad Creator
-description: >-
-  Meta-squad para criar squads de agentes baseados em elite minds reais.
-  Orchestrator: @squad-chief (triage, routing, criação completa de squads).
-  Tier 1 Trio: @oalanicolas (Research & Extraction - mind cloning, DNA extraction, curadoria),
-  @pedro-valerio (Process & Automation - veto conditions, workflow validation),
-  @thiago_finch (Business Strategy & Marketing - funnel analysis, ROI, go-to-market).
-  v3.1: Complete trio — Alan extrai, Pedro estrutura, Thiago direciona.
-  Estatísticas calculadas dinamicamente via *refresh-registry.
-author: AIOS Team
-entry_agent: squad-chief
-slashPrefix: squadCreator
-
-# Activation settings - controls what displays when agent is activated
-settings:
-  activation:
-    show_ecosystem_report: true   # Display stats on activation
-    show_greeting: true           # Display agent greeting
-    show_quick_commands: true     # Display command shortcuts
-
-  # Ecosystem report configuration (only if show_ecosystem_report: true)
-  ecosystem_report:
-    show_totals: true             # Total squads, agents, tasks
-    show_top_squads: true         # Table of largest squads
-    show_quality_refs: true       # Gold standard references
-    show_gaps: false              # Identified domain gaps
-    top_squads_limit: 5           # How many squads to display
-
-metadata:
-  version: "3.1.0"
-  score: 9.5
-

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/tasks/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -1,80 +0,0 @@
-# Changelog - validate-squad.md
-
-Todas as alterações notáveis no arquivo `validate-squad.md` serão documentadas aqui.
-
----
-
-## [3.2.1] - 2026-02-04
-
-### Adicionado
-- **T3-DOC: Changelog separation check**
-  - Verifica se tasks >= v2.0.0 têm CHANGELOG.md separado
-  - Referencia HO-DP-001 do best-practices.md
-  - Peso: 1 ponto no score de Documentation
-
----
-
-## [3.2.0] - 2026-02-04
-
-### Adicionado
-- **T2-TOOL-001: Tool Registry Validation**
-  - Valida `tool-registry.yaml` se squad usa tools/MCPs externos
-  - Verifica se tools declaradas são acessíveis
-  - Alerta se tools não documentadas no README
-
-- **T3-OPT: Optimization Opportunities Check**
-  - Identifica tasks Agent que poderiam ser Worker (economia de custo)
-  - Referencia `executor-decision-tree.md` (Q1-Q6)
-  - Fornece projeção econômica (estimativa de economia mensal)
-  - Apenas informacional, não bloqueia
-
-- **T4H-EX: Executor Decision Tree Validation** (Hybrid squads)
-  - Valida campo `execution_type` nas tasks
-  - Verifica aplicação correta do decision tree Q1-Q6
-  - Confirma que tasks Worker têm scripts
-  - Confirma que tasks Hybrid têm `human_checkpoint`
-  - Valida fallback chain definido
-  - Peso: 35% do score Hybrid (REQUIRED)
-
-### Alterado
-- Ajustados pesos TIER 3: 20% cada (era 25%)
-- Ajustados pesos TIER 4 Hybrid para acomodar executor validation
-- Atualizada tabela Quick Reference com novos componentes
-- Adicionadas referências a `executor-decision-tree.md`, `tool-registry.yaml`, `optimize.md`
-
----
-
-## [3.1.0] - 2026-02-02
-
-### Corrigido
-- Minor fixes e clarificações
-
----
-
-## [3.0.0] - 2026-02-01
-
-### Adicionado
-- Detecção de tipo de squad (Expert/Pipeline/Hybrid)
-- Sistema de validação em 4 tiers
-- Prompt quality, pipeline coherence, checklist actionability checks
-- Coverage ratio checks
-- Type-specific veto conditions
-
-### Alterado
-- `voice_dna`/`objection_algorithms` agora são contextuais (não obrigatórios para todos)
-- Alinhamento com `squad-checklist.md` v3.0
-
----
-
-## [2.0.0] - 2026-01-15
-
-### Alterado
-- Abordagem de validação qualitativa
-- Checks baseados em princípios
-
----
-
-## [1.0.0] - 2025-12-01
-
-### Adicionado
-- Task inicial de validação

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/tasks/an-assess-sources.md

@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
-# Task: Assess Sources
-
-**Command:** `*assess-sources`
-**Load:** `data/an-source-tiers.yaml`
-
-## Purpose
-
-Avaliar e classificar todas as fontes disponiveis para um projeto de clone, gerando um source map priorizado.
-
-## Workflow
-
-### Step 1: Collect Sources
-
-Perguntar ao usuario:
-- "Liste TODOS os materiais que voce tem dessa pessoa"
-- Tipos: videos, podcasts, livros, posts, stories, comentarios, entrevistas, cursos
-
-### Step 2: Classify Each Source
-
-Para cada fonte, avaliar usando 5 dimensoes de curadoria:
-
-| Dimensao | Pergunta | Score 1-5 |
-|----------|----------|-----------|
-| Autenticidade | Pensamento real ou performance? | |
-| Profundidade | Frameworks/decisoes ou superficie? | |
-| Atualidade | Reflete pensamento atual? | |
-| Unicidade | Mostra o que torna UNICO? | |
-| Completude | Cobre Playbook + Framework + exemplos? | |
-
-**Classificacao:**
-- Media >= 4.0 → **OURO**
-- Media 3.0-3.9 → **MIXED** (usar com cautela)
-- Media < 3.0 → **BRONZE** (descartar como base)
-
-### Step 3: Prioritize
-
-Ordenar fontes ouro por valor de extracao:
-1. Entrevistas longas com perguntas dificeis (maior valor)
-2. Comentarios respondendo perguntas reais
-3. Cases detalhados com analise
-4. Livros com metodologia propria
-5. Stories espontaneos
-
-### Step 4: Generate Source Map
-
-```yaml
-source_assessment:
-  mind: "{nome}"
-  total_sources: {n}
-  classification:
-    ouro: {n} ({%})
-    mixed: {n} ({%})
-    bronze: {n} ({%})
-  sources:
-    - name: "{fonte}"
-      type: "{tipo}"
-      tier: "ouro|mixed|bronze"
-      scores:
-        autenticidade: {1-5}
-        profundidade: {1-5}
-        atualidade: {1-5}
-        unicidade: {1-5}
-        completude: {1-5}
-      media: {score}
-      extraction_priority: {1-n}
-      notes: "{observacoes}"
-  recommendations:
-    - "{acao recomendada}"
-  curadoria_score: "{media geral das fontes ouro}"
-```
-
-## Completion Criteria
-
-- [ ] Todas as fontes listadas
-- [ ] Cada fonte classificada com 5 dimensoes
-- [ ] Ouro vs Bronze separado
-- [ ] Prioridade de extracao definida
-- [ ] Source map YAML gerado

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/tasks/an-clone-review.md

@@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
-# Task: Clone Review
-
-**Command:** `*clone-review`
-**Load:** `data/an-source-tiers.yaml`
-
-## Purpose
-
-Review completo de um clone existente: fontes, trindade, estagios, fidelidade. Equivalente a um audit geral.
-
-## Workflow
-
-### Step 1: Source Quality Review
-
-Avaliar fontes usadas no clone:
-- Classificar cada fonte (ouro vs bronze)
-- Calcular % ouro vs bronze
-- Verificar se base principal e ouro
-
-**Curadoria Score:**
-- 80%+ ouro → Excelente
-- 60-80% ouro → Aceitavel, melhorar
-- <60% ouro → Critico, refazer curadoria
-
-### Step 2: Trinity Verification
-
-Verificar presenca e qualidade de cada perna:
-
-| Perna | Presente? | Qualidade | Gaps |
-|-------|-----------|-----------|------|
-| Playbook | Sim/Nao | 1-5 | {o que falta} |
-| Framework | Sim/Nao | 1-5 | {o que falta} |
-| Swipe File | Sim/Nao | 1-5 | {o que falta} |
-
-**Regra AN003**: SE clone fraco → provavelmente falta Framework.
-
-Qualidade por perna:
-- Playbook: Passos sao claros e sequenciais?
-- Framework: Tem regras SE/ENTAO especificas?
-- Swipe File: Exemplos sao REAIS (nao inventados)?
-
-### Step 3: Stage Architecture Review
-
-SE clone usa estagios:
-- Cada estagio tem trindade propria?
-- Transicoes entre estagios sao claras?
-- Comportamento muda corretamente por contexto?
-
-SE clone nao usa estagios:
-- Precisa? Comportamento muda por contexto?
-- **Regra AN004**: Prompt gigante sem estagios = IA se perde
-
-### Step 4: Quick Fidelity Check
-
-Avaliacao rapida (nao full score):
-- Voice DNA presente e consistente?
-- Thinking DNA com frameworks proprios?
-- Mantem personagem sob pressao basica?
-- Estimativa rapida de fidelidade
-
-### Step 5: Generate Review Report
-
-```yaml
-clone_review:
-  clone: "{nome}"
-  date: "{data}"
-  source_quality:
-    total_sources: {n}
-    ouro_percentage: "{%}"
-    curadoria_score: "excelente|aceitavel|critico"
-    action: "{recomendacao}"
-  trinity:
-    playbook:
-      present: true|false
-      quality: {1-5}
-      gaps: "{o que falta}"
-    framework:
-      present: true|false
-      quality: {1-5}
-      gaps: "{o que falta}"
-    swipe_file:
-      present: true|false
-      quality: {1-5}
-      gaps: "{o que falta}"
-  stages:
-    has_stages: true|false
-    needs_stages: true|false
-    stage_quality: "{avaliacao}"
-  fidelity_estimate: "{%}"
-  overall_verdict: "SOLID|NEEDS_WORK|REBUILD"
-  priority_actions:
-    - action: "{o que fazer primeiro}"
-      impact: "alto|medio"
-    - action: "{segundo}"
-      impact: "alto|medio"
-  next_version_path: "De {current}% para {target}% fazendo {acoes}"
-```
-
-## Completion Criteria
-
-- [ ] Fontes avaliadas (curadoria score)
-- [ ] Trindade verificada (3 pernas)
-- [ ] Estagios revisados (se aplicavel)
-- [ ] Fidelidade estimada
-- [ ] Review report com verdict e acoes prioritarias