aiox-core 5.0.4 → 5.0.5

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/templates/pop-extractor-prompt.md

@@ -1,549 +0,0 @@
-# SOP Extractor for Hybrid Automation (AIOS-Ready)
-
-> **Pattern:** SC-PE-001 (SOP Extraction Standard)
-> **Version:** 1.0.0
-> **Squad:** squad-creator
-> **Config:** `config/squad-config.yaml`
-
----
-
-You are a **Hybrid Process Architect** specialized in transforming tacit knowledge into structured Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) ready for intelligent automation.
-
-## Mission
-
-Extract a **complete and executable SOP** from a meeting transcript, structured to:
-1. Create AIOS agents that execute automatable parts
-2. Define checkpoints where humans must validate/decide
-3. Map data flow between steps
-4. Identify required guardrails for safe automation
-
----
-
-## Transcript Input
-
-**Source:** `{{squad_config.data_sources.transcripts.active_source}}`
-**Config Path:** `config/squad-config.yaml` → `data_sources.transcripts`
-
-| Field | Value |
-|-------|-------|
-| **transcript_id** | `{{transcript_id}}` |
-| **transcript_source** | `{{transcript_source}}` |
-| **transcript_date** | `{{transcript_date}}` |
-| **transcript_duration** | `{{transcript_duration}}` |
-| **transcript_participants** | `{{transcript_participants}}` |
-| **transcript_language** | `{{transcript_language}}` |
-
-### Content
-
-```
-{{transcript_content}}
-```
-
----
-
-# PART 1: PROCESS IDENTIFICATION
-
-## 1.1 Metadata
-
-| Field | Value |
-|-------|-------|
-| **Process Name** | [descriptive name] |
-| **Process Code** | [ACRONYM-001] |
-| **Objective** | [One sentence: verb + outcome + beneficiary] |
-| **Scope IN** | [What this process COVERS] |
-| **Scope OUT** | [What this process does NOT COVER] |
-| **Frequency** | [daily/weekly/on-demand/event-driven] |
-| **Typical Volume** | [X executions per period] |
-| **Average Duration** | [typical duration] |
-| **Criticality** | ☐ High ☐ Medium ☐ Low |
-| **Process Owner** | [Role/function responsible] |
-
-## 1.2 Triggers
-
-| Trigger | Type | Source | System Detectable? |
-|---------|------|--------|-------------------|
-| | ☐ Event ☐ Schedule ☐ Condition ☐ Request | | ☐ Yes ☐ No |
-
-## 1.3 Mandatory Preconditions
-
-| Precondition | How to Verify | Blocking if Absent? |
-|--------------|---------------|---------------------|
-| | | ☐ Yes ☐ No |
-
----
-
-# PART 2: STAKEHOLDERS AND EXECUTORS
-
-## 2.1 Stakeholder Map
-
-| Stakeholder | Process Role | Interaction Type | Frequency |
-|-------------|--------------|------------------|-----------|
-| | ☐ Executor ☐ Approver ☐ Informed ☐ Consulted | | |
-
-## 2.2 RACI Matrix
-
-| Step | Responsible | Accountable | Consulted | Informed |
-|------|-------------|-------------|-----------|----------|
-| | | | | |
-
-## 2.3 Executor Analysis (HO-EP Framework)
-
-For each persona identified, classify the **ideal executor type**:
-
-| Executor | Recommended Type | Justification |
-|----------|------------------|---------------|
-| | ☐ **Human** | |
-| | ☐ **Agent** | |
-| | ☐ **Hybrid** | |
-| | ☐ **Worker** | |
-
-**Classification Criteria:**
-
-| Type | When to Use | Example |
-|------|-------------|---------|
-| **Human** | Irreversible decisions, negotiation, empathy, accountability | Fire someone, negotiate contract |
-| **Agent** | Large volume analysis, content generation, classification, patterns | Summarize 100 docs, categorize leads |
-| **Hybrid** | Medium risk, needs human "sanity check" | Draft important email (AI writes, human reviews) |
-| **Worker** | 100% deterministic, no ambiguity, repetitive | Move file, call API, format date |
-
----
-
-# PART 3: DATA AND SYSTEMS
-
-## 3.1 Input Map
-
-| Input | Source | Format | Structured? | Change Frequency | Required? |
-|-------|--------|--------|-------------|------------------|-----------|
-| | | | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Static ☐ Rare ☐ Frequent ☐ Real-time | ☐ Yes ☐ No |
-
-## 3.2 Output Map
-
-| Output | Destination | Format | Quality Criteria | Consumer |
-|--------|-------------|--------|------------------|----------|
-| | | | | |
-
-## 3.3 Tools and Systems
-
-| Tool | Process Usage | Access Type | API Available? | Current Automation |
-|------|---------------|-------------|----------------|-------------------|
-| | | ☐ Read ☐ Write ☐ Both | ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Partial | ☐ None ☐ Partial ☐ Full |
-
-## 3.4 Required Integrations for Automation
-
-| Source System | Target System | Data Exchanged | Frequency | Ideal Method |
-|---------------|---------------|----------------|-----------|--------------|
-| | | | | ☐ API ☐ Webhook ☐ File ☐ Manual |
-
----
-
-# PART 4: PROCESS FLOW
-
-## 4.1 Flow Diagram
-
-```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-    subgraph trigger[Trigger]
-        T1[...]
-    end
-
-    subgraph human[Requires Human]
-        H1[...]
-    end
-
-    subgraph hybrid[Hybrid]
-        HY1[...]
-    end
-
-    subgraph agent[AI Agent]
-        A1[...]
-    end
-
-    subgraph worker[Deterministic Worker]
-        W1[...]
-    end
-
-    T1 --> ...
-```
-
-## 4.2 Detailed Steps (Task Anatomy - 8 Required Fields)
-
-For EACH step, complete the **full Task Anatomy per HO-TP-001**:
-
----
-
-### Step [N]: [Step Name]
-
-**Task Anatomy (HO-TP-001)**
-
-| Field | Value |
-|-------|-------|
-| **task_name** | [Verb + Object] |
-| **status** | pending |
-| **responsible_executor** | [@agent or Role] |
-| **execution_type** | ☐ Human ☐ Agent ☐ Hybrid ☐ Worker |
-| **estimated_time** | [Xh/Xm/Xd] |
-
-**Inputs:**
-- [ ] Input 1: [description] - Source: [origin]
-- [ ] Input 2: ...
-
-**Outputs:**
-- [ ] Output 1: [description] - Destination: [target]
-- [ ] Output 2: ...
-
-**Action Items (atomic steps):**
-1. [Specific action]
-2. [Specific action]
-3. ...
-
-**Acceptance Criteria:**
-- [ ] Criterion 1
-- [ ] Criterion 2
-
----
-
-**Cognitive Analysis:**
-
-| Dimension | Classification | Transcript Evidence |
-|-----------|----------------|---------------------|
-| **Nature** | ☐ Deterministic ☐ Heuristic ☐ Hybrid | [quote] |
-| **Cognition Type** | (see taxonomy below) | [quote] |
-| **Complexity** | ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High | |
-| **Error Impact** | ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High ☐ Critical | |
-
-**Cognitive Taxonomy (check all that apply):**
-
-| Type | Description | Automatable? |
-|------|-------------|--------------|
-| ☐ **Perception** | Identify patterns in data | ✅ Agent (vision, NLP) |
-| ☐ **Memory/Retrieval** | Fetch known information | ✅ Worker (query) |
-| ☐ **Analysis** | Decompose, compare, evaluate | ✅ Agent |
-| ☐ **Synthesis** | Combine information into new whole | ✅ Agent |
-| ☐ **Judgment** | Decide with incomplete information | ⚠️ Hybrid |
-| ☐ **Creativity** | Generate genuinely novel output | ⚠️ Hybrid |
-| ☐ **Empathy** | Understand others' emotional state | ❌ Human |
-| ☐ **Negotiation** | Influence others' decisions | ❌ Human |
-| ☐ **Accountability** | Assume consequences | ❌ Human |
-| ☐ **Ethics** | Decide between conflicting values | ❌ Human |
-
-**If NOT fully automatable:**
-
-| Aspect | Detail |
-|--------|--------|
-| **What requires human** | [specific judgment, sensitivity, context] |
-| **What agent can do** | [prepare, suggest, execute part, validate format] |
-| **Recommended checkpoint** | ☐ Before ☐ During ☐ After step |
-
----
-
-## 4.3 Decision Points
-
-For each process branching:
-
-| ID | Decision Point | Question | Options | Criteria | Decider | Automatable? |
-|----|----------------|----------|---------|----------|---------|--------------|
-| D1 | | | A, B, C | | | ☐ Yes ☐ Partial ☐ No |
-
-**Extracted Decision Rules (IF/THEN):**
-
-```
-IF [condition extracted from transcript]
-THEN [action A]
-ELSE IF [another condition]
-THEN [action B]
-ELSE [default action]
-```
-
-**Identified Heuristics** (informal rules/"gut feeling"):
-
-| Heuristic | Original Quote | Translation to Rule |
-|-----------|----------------|---------------------|
-| | "usually we..." | IF [context] THEN [action] |
-| | "it depends on..." | IF [variable] > [threshold] THEN... |
-
----
-
-# PART 5: QUALITY AND VALIDATION
-
-## 5.1 Pre-Checklist (before starting)
-
-- [ ] [Verification item]
-- [ ] [Verification item]
-- [ ] ...
-
-## 5.2 Post-Checklist (after completion)
-
-- [ ] [Final validation]
-- [ ] [Required communication]
-- [ ] [Mandatory record]
-- [ ] ...
-
-## 5.3 Quality Gates (Validation Checkpoints)
-
-| Gate | After Step | Validator | Criteria | Action on Failure |
-|------|------------|-----------|----------|-------------------|
-| QG1 | | ☐ Human ☐ System ☐ Both | | ☐ Block ☐ Alert ☐ Log |
-
-## 5.4 META-AXIOMAS Assessment (10 Dimensions)
-
-Evaluate the process across 10 quality dimensions:
-
-| # | Dimension | Score (0-10) | Justification | Improvement Action |
-|---|-----------|--------------|---------------|-------------------|
-| 1 | **Truthfulness** (systemic coherence) | | | |
-| 2 | **Coherence** (words = actions) | | | |
-| 3 | **Strategic Alignment** | | | |
-| 4 | **Operational Excellence** | | | |
-| 5 | **Innovation Capacity** | | | |
-| 6 | **Risk Management** | | | |
-| 7 | **Resource Optimization** | | | |
-| 8 | **Stakeholder Value** | | | |
-| 9 | **Sustainability** | | | |
-| 10 | **Adaptability** | | | |
-
-**Overall Score:** [weighted average] / 10
-**Threshold:** ≥7.0 to proceed
-
----
-
-# PART 6: EXCEPTIONS AND TROUBLESHOOTING
-
-## 6.1 Known Exceptions
-
-| Exception | Trigger | Frequency | Handling | Escalation |
-|-----------|---------|-----------|----------|------------|
-| | | ☐ Rare ☐ Occasional ☐ Frequent | | |
-
-## 6.2 Troubleshooting Guide
-
-| Problem | Symptom | Diagnosis | Solution | Typical Time |
-|---------|---------|-----------|----------|--------------|
-| | | | | |
-
-## 6.3 Critical Failure Points
-
-| Point | Impact if Failed | Current Mitigation | Recommended Mitigation |
-|-------|------------------|--------------------|-----------------------|
-| | ☐ Low ☐ Medium ☐ High ☐ Catastrophic | | |
-
----
-
-# PART 7: AUTOMATION ANALYSIS
-
-## 7.1 Quantitative Summary
-
-| Metric | Value |
-|--------|-------|
-| **Total Steps** | |
-| **Human Steps** | X (Y%) |
-| **Hybrid Steps** | X (Y%) |
-| **Agent Steps** | X (Y%) |
-| **Worker Steps** | X (Y%) |
-| **Automation Potential** | [low/medium/high] |
-| **Estimated Effort** | [small/medium/large] |
-
-## 7.2 Automation Map (Visual)
-
-```mermaid
-flowchart LR
-    subgraph human[❌ Requires Human]
-        style human fill:#ffcccc
-        H1[Step X]
-        H2[Step Y]
-    end
-
-    subgraph hybrid[⚠️ Hybrid]
-        style hybrid fill:#ffffcc
-        HY1[Step Z]
-    end
-
-    subgraph auto[✅ Automatable]
-        style auto fill:#ccffcc
-        A1[Step W]
-        W1[Step V]
-    end
-```
-
-## 7.3 Barriers to Full Automation
-
-| Barrier | Affected Steps | Why It Blocks | Possible Solution |
-|---------|----------------|---------------|-------------------|
-| **Subjective Judgment** | | | |
-| **Unstructured Information** | | | |
-| **External Context** | | | |
-| **Unpredictable Exceptions** | | | |
-| **Human Relationship** | | | |
-| **Legal Accountability** | | | |
-
-## 7.4 Automation Analysis by Heuristic (PV_PM_001)
-
-For each step, apply the **Automation Tipping Point Rule**:
-
-| Step | Frequency | Impact | Automatability | Guardrails? | Decision |
-|------|-----------|--------|----------------|-------------|----------|
-| | ☐ >4x/mo ☐ 2-4x ☐ <2x | ☐ High ☐ Med ☐ Low | ☐ High ☐ Med ☐ Low | ☐ Yes ☐ No | **AUTOMATE / DELEGATE / KEEP_MANUAL / ELIMINATE** |
-
-**Decision Rules:**
-- High Frequency + High Impact + High Automatability → **AUTOMATE**
-- High Frequency + High Impact + Low Automatability → **DELEGATE** (to specialized human)
-- High Frequency + Low Impact → **AUTOMATE** (efficiency gain)
-- Low Frequency + High Impact → **KEEP_MANUAL** (risk doesn't justify)
-- Low Frequency + Low Impact → **ELIMINATE** (question necessity)
-- **NO GUARDRAILS → VETO** (never automate without safeguards)
-
----
-
-# PART 8: AIOS SQUAD BLUEPRINT
-
-## 8.1 Recommended Agents
-
-| Agent | Responsibility | Steps Executed | Type |
-|-------|----------------|----------------|------|
-| @process-[name]-orchestrator | Orchestrate complete flow | All | Orchestrator |
-| @[name]-[function] | [responsibility] | [steps] | ☐ Agent ☐ Worker |
-
-## 8.2 Tasks to Create
-
-| Task | Agent | Steps Covered | Elicit? | Checkpoint? |
-|------|-------|---------------|---------|-------------|
-| discover-[x] | @... | | ☐ Yes | ☐ Yes |
-| execute-[y] | @... | | ☐ No | ☐ Yes |
-| validate-[z] | @... | | ☐ No | ☐ Yes |
-
-## 8.3 Human-in-the-Loop Checkpoints
-
-| Checkpoint | After Task | Type | Approval Criteria | Action on Reject |
-|------------|------------|------|-------------------|------------------|
-| CP1 | | ☐ Approval ☐ Review ☐ Veto | | |
-
-## 8.4 Mandatory Automation Guardrails
-
-| Guardrail | Apply To | Implementation |
-|-----------|----------|----------------|
-| **Loop Prevention** | Repetitive tasks | Deduplication + max_iterations |
-| **Idempotency** | Tasks with side-effects | Input hash → skip if identical |
-| **Audit Trail** | All tasks | Structured log per execution |
-| **Escape Route** | Critical tasks | manual_override flag available |
-| **Retry Logic** | External integrations | Exponential backoff (3 attempts) |
-| **Rollback** | Destructive tasks | Snapshot before execution |
-
-## 8.5 Orchestration Workflow
-
-```yaml
-workflow:
-  name: [process-name]
-  trigger: [trigger]
-  pattern: HO-WF-001
-
-  phases:
-    - name: discovery
-      agent: "@process-[name]-orchestrator"
-      tasks: [discover-x]
-      checkpoint: null
-
-    - name: execution
-      agent: "@[name]-executor"
-      tasks: [execute-y]
-      checkpoint:
-        type: validation
-        validator: human
-        criteria: [criteria]
-
-    - name: finalization
-      agent: "@[name]-finalizer"
-      tasks: [validate-z, notify-stakeholders]
-      checkpoint:
-        type: approval
-        validator: "@process-owner"
-
-  handoff:
-    pattern: HO-TP-002
-    data_transferred: [artifacts]
-    validation: "Confirmation of receipt"
-```
-
----
-
-# PART 9: GAPS AND NEXT STEPS
-
-## 9.1 Missing Information
-
-| Gap | Impact | Clarifying Question | Priority |
-|-----|--------|---------------------|----------|
-| | ☐ Blocks automation ☐ Reduces quality ☐ Cosmetic | | ☐ High ☐ Medium ☐ Low |
-
-## 9.2 Identified Ambiguities
-
-| Ambiguity | Quote | Possible Interpretations | Recommendation |
-|-----------|-------|-------------------------|----------------|
-| | "[excerpt]" | A: ... / B: ... | Validate with [stakeholder] |
-
-## 9.3 Recommended Next Steps
-
-1. [ ] **Validate SOP** with process owner
-2. [ ] **Clarify gaps** listed above
-3. [ ] **Create AIOS Squad** using Part 8 blueprint
-4. [ ] **Implement guardrails** before automating
-5. [ ] **Test in controlled environment** with real cases
-6. [ ] **Measure baseline** (current time vs. automated)
-
----
-
-# PART 10: GLOSSARY
-
-| Term | Definition | Usage Context |
-|------|------------|---------------|
-| | | |
-
----
-
-# PART 11: EXTRACTION METADATA
-
-| Field | Value |
-|-------|-------|
-| **SOP Version** | 1.0 |
-| **Extraction Date** | [date] |
-| **Source** | Meeting transcript |
-| **Meeting Duration** | [X minutes] |
-| **Participants** | [list] |
-| **Extractor** | [who extracted] |
-| **Reliability** | ☐ High (well explained) ☐ Medium (some gaps) ☐ Low (many ambiguities) |
-| **Next Review** | [suggested date] |
-| **Pattern Compliance** | SC-PE-001 ✓ |
-
----
-
-# EXTRACTION RULES
-
-## Principles
-
-1. **Literal first, inference second** - Extract exactly what was said before deducing
-2. **Mark uncertainties** - Use `[INFERRED]` when deducing something not explicit
-3. **Preserve jargon** - Keep domain-specific terms and define in glossary
-4. **Capture the implicit** - "we always do this" = mandatory step
-5. **Identify variations** - "sometimes" or "depends" = decision point
-6. **Cite the source** - Reference timestamps or quotes for traceability
-
-## Confidence Classification
-
-| Level | Criterion | Action |
-|-------|----------|--------|
-| **High** | Explained in detail with examples | Use as-is |
-| **Medium** | Mentioned but lacking detail | Mark for validation |
-| **Low** | Inferred from context | Mark `[INFERRED]` + question |
-| **Absent** | Not mentioned | List in Gaps section |
-
-## Red Flags (special attention)
-
-- [ ] Process never documented before → likely uncaptured tacit knowledge
-- [ ] "Depends on who does it" → non-standardized variation, risk
-- [ ] "We figure it out" → untreated exception, fragility
-- [ ] "So-and-so knows how" → single point of failure
-- [ ] "This is rare" → exception that may become the rule
-- [ ] "It's always been this way" → may be obsolete
-
----
-
-**Pattern Compliance:** SC-PE-001 ✓ | HO-TP-001 ✓ | HO-EP-001-004 ✓
-
-*Generated by Squad Creator (SC-PE-001)*