aiox-core 5.0.4 → 5.0.5

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/checklists/mind-validation.md

@@ -1,374 +0,0 @@
-# Mind Validation Checklist
-
-**Purpose:** Validate if a mind has sufficient documentation to be cloned into an agent
-**Used by:** `workflows/mind-research-loop.md` (Iteration 3)
-**Quality Gate:** BLOCKING - minds that fail CANNOT enter the squad
-
----
-
-## Philosophy
-
-> "It doesn't matter if someone is the best in the world if there's no documented process we can replicate."
-
-**Absolute Criterion:**
-```
-"Is there sufficient documentation of this person's processes
-for an agent to replicate the method?"
-
-- YES → Proceeds to next validation
-- NO → CUT, no matter how famous they are
-```
-
----
-
-## Quick Validation (5 Mandatory Criteria)
-
-### Scoring System
-
-| Criterion | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
-|-----------|---|---|---|---|
-| **Documented Framework** | Doesn't exist | Vaguely mentioned | Partially documented | Fully documented |
-| **Extractable Process** | No process | Loose tips | General steps | Clear step-by-step |
-| **Available Artifacts** | Nothing | Concepts only | Some templates | Templates + Checklists |
-| **Application Examples** | None | Mentions | Some cases | Detailed cases |
-| **Accessible Material** | Doesn't exist | Hard to find | Partially accessible | Easily accessible |
-
-### Thresholds
-
-| Total Score | Status | Action |
-|-------------|--------|--------|
-| 12-15 | ✅ PASS | Include in squad |
-| 10-11 | ⚠️ CONDITIONAL | Include with caveats |
-| 7-9 | ❌ FAIL | Seek alternative |
-| 0-6 | 🚫 HARD FAIL | Discard |
-
-**Minimum to pass: 10/15**
-
----
-
-## 1. DOCUMENTED FRAMEWORK
-
-### What to look for:
-
-- [ ] **Framework/methodology has its own name**
-  - Ex: "AIDA", "StoryBrand", "Jobs to be Done"
-  - Red flag: Only "X's methodology" without specific name
-
-- [ ] **Defined structure**
-  - Ex: "5 steps", "3 pillars", "7 principles"
-  - Red flag: Vague concepts without structure
-
-- [ ] **Official documentation**
-  - Book, course, certification, official website
-  - Red flag: Only mentions in third-party articles
-
-### Validation Questions:
-
-```yaml
-questions:
-  - "What is the NAME of this person's framework?"
-  - "Does this framework have a DEFINED STRUCTURE (steps, phases, components)?"
-  - "Where is it OFFICIALLY DOCUMENTED?"
-```
-
-### Scoring:
-
-| Score | Criterion |
-|-------|----------|
-| 0 | No identifiable framework exists |
-| 1 | Has "approach" but no formal structure |
-| 2 | Framework exists, partially documented |
-| 3 | Framework with name, structure, and complete documentation |
-
----
-
-## 2. EXTRACTABLE PROCESS
-
-### What to look for:
-
-- [ ] **Clear sequence of steps**
-  - "First do X, then Y, then Z"
-  - Red flag: "It's more art than science"
-
-- [ ] **Documented decisions**
-  - "If A happens, do B"
-  - Red flag: Depends 100% on intuition
-
-- [ ] **Entry/exit criteria**
-  - "Start when you have X, finish when Y"
-  - Red flag: Vague process without clear start/end
-
-### Validation Questions:
-
-```yaml
-questions:
-  - "Is there a documented STEP-BY-STEP process?"
-  - "Are the steps SEQUENTIAL and clear?"
-  - "Could a beginner FOLLOW the process?"
-```
-
-### Scoring:
-
-| Score | Criterion |
-|-------|----------|
-| 0 | No identifiable process |
-| 1 | Loose tips and principles, not sequential |
-| 2 | General process exists, but has gaps |
-| 3 | Complete and clear step-by-step process |
-
----
-
-## 3. AVAILABLE ARTIFACTS
-
-### What to look for:
-
-- [ ] **Templates**
-  - Fillable structures, blueprints
-  - Ex: "Gary Halbert's Sales Page Template"
-
-- [ ] **Checklists**
-  - Verification lists derived from the method
-  - Ex: "Copy Review Checklist"
-
-- [ ] **Visual frameworks**
-  - Diagrams, matrices, canvases
-  - Ex: "Business Model Canvas"
-
-- [ ] **Annotated examples**
-  - Expert's work with analysis
-  - Ex: "Sales letter X line by line"
-
-### Validation Questions:
-
-```yaml
-questions:
-  - "Are there TEMPLATES we can use?"
-  - "Are there CHECKLISTS derived from the method?"
-  - "Are there ANNOTATED EXAMPLES of this person's work?"
-```
-
-### Scoring:
-
-| Score | Criterion |
-|-------|----------|
-| 0 | No artifacts found |
-| 1 | Only concepts, no practical artifacts |
-| 2 | Some templates or checklists |
-| 3 | Templates + Checklists + Annotated examples |
-
----
-
-## 4. APPLICATION EXAMPLES
-
-### What to look for:
-
-- [ ] **Expert's own work**
-  - Portfolios, cases, projects
-  - Ex: Gary Halbert's sales letters
-
-- [ ] **Documented success cases**
-  - Measurable results
-  - Ex: "This letter generated $X million"
-
-- [ ] **Before/After**
-  - Comparisons showing the method in action
-  - Ex: "Copy before vs after revision"
-
-- [ ] **Third-party analysis**
-  - Breakdowns, case studies
-  - Ex: "Why letter X worked"
-
-### Validation Questions:
-
-```yaml
-questions:
-  - "Are there WORKS BY THE EXPERT THEMSELVES that we can analyze?"
-  - "Are there SUCCESS CASES with measurable results?"
-  - "Are there DETAILED ANALYSES of examples?"
-```
-
-### Scoring:
-
-| Score | Criterion |
-|-------|----------|
-| 0 | No examples found |
-| 1 | Vague mentions without details |
-| 2 | Some documented cases |
-| 3 | Multiple detailed cases with analysis |
-
----
-
-## 5. ACCESSIBLE MATERIAL
-
-### What to look for:
-
-- [ ] **Published books**
-  - Available for purchase/download
-  - In English or Portuguese
-
-- [ ] **Courses/Trainings**
-  - Online or documented in-person
-  - Transcripts available
-
-- [ ] **Articles/Newsletters**
-  - Accessible archive
-  - Substantial content
-
-- [ ] **Interviews/Podcasts**
-  - Transcripts or recordings
-  - Deep content (not superficial)
-
-### Validation Questions:
-
-```yaml
-questions:
-  - "Is the material ACCESSIBLE (purchasable, downloadable)?"
-  - "Is there SUFFICIENT QUANTITY of material?"
-  - "Does the material have DEPTH (not superficial)?"
-```
-
-### Scoring:
-
-| Score | Criterion |
-|-------|----------|
-| 0 | Material doesn't exist or is inaccessible |
-| 1 | Hard to find, little material |
-| 2 | Material exists but partially accessible |
-| 3 | Abundant easily accessible material |
-
----
-
-## Validation Report Template
-
-```markdown
-# Mind Validation: {Expert Name}
-
-**Date:** {date}
-**Domain:** {domain}
-**Validator:** {automated/manual}
-
----
-
-## Quick Score
-
-| Criterion | Score | Evidence |
-|----------|-------|----------|
-| Documented Framework | {0-3} | {source/link} |
-| Extractable Process | {0-3} | {source/link} |
-| Available Artifacts | {0-3} | {type found} |
-| Application Examples | {0-3} | {quantity} |
-| Accessible Material | {0-3} | {type/where} |
-| **TOTAL** | **{X}/15** | |
-
----
-
-## Status: {PASS/CONDITIONAL/FAIL/HARD_FAIL}
-
----
-
-## Identified Framework
-
-**Name:** {framework name}
-**Structure:** {structure description}
-**Official source:** {link/book}
-
----
-
-## Material Found
-
-### Books
-- {title} - {where to find}
-
-### Courses
-- {title} - {where to find}
-
-### Articles/Transcripts
-- {title} - {link}
-
-### Analyzable Examples
-- {description} - {where to find}
-
----
-
-## Identified Gaps
-
-- {gap 1}
-- {gap 2}
-
----
-
-## Recommendation
-
-{INCLUDE IN SQUAD / INCLUDE WITH CAVEATS / SEEK ALTERNATIVE / DISCARD}
-
-**Justification:** {reason for decision}
-
----
-
-## Next Steps (if PASS)
-
-1. Execute `deep-research-pre-agent.md` for {expert}
-2. Focus on: {specific areas to research}
-3. Priority material: {specific book/course}
-```
-
----
-
-## Red Flags (Automatic Cut)
-
-### Cut immediately if:
-
-- [ ] **Only has fame, no framework**
-  - "Influencer" without own methodology
-
-- [ ] **Framework belongs to others**
-  - Person only teaches/popularizes, didn't create
-
-- [ ] **No examples of own work**
-  - Only theory, no demonstrated practice
-
-- [ ] **Inaccessible material**
-  - Died without leaving documented legacy
-  - Material in inaccessible language
-  - Content lost/offline
-
-- [ ] **Only one old book**
-  - No updates or complementary material
-  - Context too outdated
-
----
-
-## Validation Workflow
-
-```
-1. Identify expert name
-   ↓
-2. Search for main framework
-   → If doesn't exist → HARD FAIL
-   ↓
-3. Verify process documentation
-   → If vague/nonexistent → FAIL
-   ↓
-4. Catalog available artifacts
-   → If none → FAIL
-   ↓
-5. List examples found
-   → If few → CONDITIONAL
-   ↓
-6. Verify material accessibility
-   → If inaccessible → FAIL
-   ↓
-7. Calculate total score
-   → < 10 → FAIL
-   → 10-11 → CONDITIONAL
-   → 12+ → PASS
-   ↓
-8. Generate report
-```
-
----
-
-**Checklist Version:** 1.0.0
-**Created:** 2026-01-25
-**Part of:** squads/squad-creator
-**Used by:** workflows/mind-research-loop.md