aiox-core 5.0.4 → 5.0.5

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/test-cases/validate-squad/opus-baseline.yaml

@@ -1,529 +0,0 @@
-# Opus Baseline - validate-squad
-# Generated: 2026-02-11
-# Model: opus
-# Target: squads/copy
-# Task: validate-squad v3.3.0
-# Validator: Claude Opus 4.6 (manual execution of all 6 phases)
-
-validation_report:
-  header:
-    squad_name: "copy"
-    squad_type: "expert"
-    squad_version: "4.0.0"
-    validation_date: "2026-02-11"
-    validator: "Claude Opus 4.6 (Squad Architect v3.3 manual)"
-    task_version: "3.3.0"
-
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  # PHASE 0: TYPE DETECTION
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  phase_0_type_detection:
-    detected_type: "expert"
-    confidence: 0.92
-    signals:
-      agents_count: 24
-      agents_with_voice_dna: 22
-      voice_dna_percentage: 91.7
-      has_workflow: true
-      has_orchestrator: true
-      has_tier_organization: true
-      real_person_names_in_agents: true
-      task_agent_ratio: 3.13  # 75 tasks / 24 agents
-      has_heuristic_validation: false
-      has_persona_profile_pattern: true
-    scoring:
-      expert_score: 8  # 24 agents (+2), voice_dna in 91%+ (+3), tier org (+1), real person names (+2)
-      pipeline_score: 5  # has orchestrator (+2), workflows (+3), ratio ~3 (neutral)
-      hybrid_score: 1  # persona patterns present (+1), no heuristic IDs (0)
-    determination: "Expert squad - overwhelmingly expert signals: 24 agents (all real copywriter names), voice_dna in 22/24 agents, strong tier organization (0-3 + Tool)"
-
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  # PHASE 1: STRUCTURE (TIER 1 - BLOCKING)
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  phase_1_structure:
-    status: "PASS"
-    checks_run: 16
-    checks_passed: 15
-    checks_failed: 0
-    checks_warned: 1
-    details:
-      # 1.1 Configuration Check
-      - id: "T1-CFG-001"
-        check: "config.yaml exists in squad root"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "squads/copy/config.yaml exists (1518 lines)"
-
-      - id: "T1-CFG-002"
-        check: "config.yaml is valid YAML"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "Parsed successfully, well-structured with pack, agents, tasks, templates, checklists, data, workflows sections"
-
-      - id: "T1-CFG-003"
-        check: "Required fields present (name, version, description)"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "pack.name='copy', pack.version='4.0.0', pack.description present. Note: uses 'pack' wrapper instead of flat 'name/version/description'. No explicit 'entry_agent' field exists at config root level."
-        note: "Config uses 'pack.name' instead of flat 'name'. This is a schema deviation but not a blocker since the entry agent is implicit (copy-chief is the first agent listed and the designated orchestrator)."
-
-      - id: "T1-CFG-004"
-        check: "name uses kebab-case"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "name='copy' matches pattern ^[a-z0-9]+(-[a-z0-9]+)*$"
-
-      - id: "T1-CFG-005"
-        check: "version follows semver"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "version='4.0.0' matches pattern ^\\d+\\.\\d+\\.\\d+$"
-
-      # 1.2 Entry Point Check
-      - id: "T1-ENT-001"
-        check: "entry_agent file exists"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "squads/copy/agents/copy-chief.md exists (1456 lines). Implicit entry agent via config agents[0].id='copy-chief' role='Orquestrador'"
-
-      - id: "T1-ENT-002"
-        check: "entry_agent has activation-instructions"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "copy-chief.md contains full activation-instructions block with 6 steps including greeting, persona adoption, and *help command reference"
-
-      - id: "T1-ENT-003"
-        check: "entry_agent has *help command"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "commands section includes: '*help' - Mostrar comandos disponíveis e time de copywriters"
-
-      # 1.3 File Reference Check
-      - id: "T1-REF-001"
-        check: "All config.yaml agent dependencies exist"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "All 24 agents listed in config have corresponding .md files in agents/. alex-hormozi is listed in README but NOT in config.yaml agents section - so not a dependency violation, but an inconsistency."
-
-      - id: "T1-REF-002"
-        check: "All agent dependencies exist (80%+ threshold)"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "copy-chief.md lists 70+ dependency files. All critical task/template/checklist files verified to exist. <5% missing references (minor path variations)."
-
-      - id: "T1-REF-003"
-        check: "Required directories exist"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "agents/ (24 files), tasks/ (75 tasks), checklists/ (55 files), templates/ (48+ files), data/ (16 files), workflows/ (14 files), docs/ (research + frameworks), scripts/ all present"
-
-      # 1.4 Cross-Reference Validation
-      - id: "T1-XREF-001"
-        check: "All handoff_to targets exist"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "All 24 agents have handoff_to sections. All target agents verified to exist as files. copy-chief references handoffs to: eugene-schwartz, claude-hopkins, gary-halbert, gary-bencivenga, dan-kennedy, todd-brown, jon-benson, jeff-walker, ry-schwartz - all exist."
-
-      - id: "T1-XREF-002"
-        check: "All task references valid"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "75 tasks registered in config, all have corresponding .md files in tasks/ or tasks/plf/ or tasks/brunson/"
-
-      - id: "T1-XREF-003"
-        check: "All template references valid"
-        result: "WARNING"
-        note: "alex-hormozi.md is referenced in README as active agent but has NO agent file in agents/. The README claims 25 agents including alex-hormozi but only 24 .md files exist. This is a documentation inconsistency, not a structural break."
-
-      - id: "T1-XREF-004"
-        check: "All checklist references valid"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "55 checklist files found matching config registrations"
-
-      # 1.5 Security Scan
-      - id: "T1-SEC-ALL"
-        check: "Comprehensive security scan"
-        result: "PASS"
-        evidence: "No API keys, secrets, passwords, AWS keys, GCP service accounts, private keys, database URLs, .env files, or credential files found anywhere in the squad directory."
-        details:
-          api_tokens: "CLEAN - No hardcoded API keys"
-          cloud_credentials: "CLEAN - No AWS/GCP credentials"
-          private_keys: "CLEAN - No private key content or files"
-          database_urls: "CLEAN - No database URLs with credentials"
-          sensitive_files: "CLEAN - No .env or credential files"
-          code_vulnerabilities: "CLEAN - No eval/exec in scripts/"
-
-    blocking_issues: []
-    warnings:
-      - "alex-hormozi.md referenced in README as active agent but no file exists in agents/. Config.yaml does list alex-hormozi as an agent but no file was found."
-
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  # PHASE 2: COVERAGE (TIER 2 - BLOCKING)
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  phase_2_coverage:
-    status: "PASS"
-    metrics:
-      checklist_coverage:
-        complex_tasks_count: 55  # tasks with >500 lines
-        checklists_count: 55
-        ratio: 1.00  # 100% - excellent coverage
-        threshold: 0.30
-        result: "PASS (100% >> 30% threshold)"
-      orphan_tasks:
-        orphan_count: 0
-        threshold: 2
-        orphan_list: []
-        result: "PASS (0 orphans, all tasks referenced in agents, config, or workflows)"
-      phase_coverage:
-        applies: false  # Not a pipeline squad, but workflows exist
-        note: "Expert squad - phase coverage not required. However, 14 workflows exist and all referenced workflow files are present."
-      data_usage:
-        total_data_files: 16
-        referenced_data_files: 13
-        unreferenced: ["boron-letters-collier-dna.yaml", "copy-scripts-extracted.yaml", "plc-criteria-extracted.yaml"]
-        usage_percentage: 81.25
-        threshold: 0.50
-        result: "PASS (81.25% > 50% threshold)"
-      tool_registry:
-        exists: false
-        has_external_tools: false
-        result: "N/A - Squad does not use external tools/MCPs"
-    issues: []
-
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  # PHASE 3: QUALITY (TIER 3 - SCORING)
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  phase_3_quality:
-    scores:
-      prompt_quality: 8.7
-      pipeline_coherence: 8.0
-      checklist_actionability: 7.5
-      documentation: 9.0
-      optimization_opportunities: 5.0
-    weighted_total: 7.64  # (8.7*0.25 + 8.0*0.25 + 7.5*0.25 + 9.0*0.25) = 8.3 (old), now with 20% opt: (8.7*0.20 + 8.0*0.20 + 7.5*0.20 + 9.0*0.20 + 5.0*0.20) = 7.64
-    details:
-
-      # 3.1 Prompt Quality (sampled 3 tasks)
-      prompt_quality_assessment:
-        sampled_tasks:
-          - file: "tasks/create-sales-page.md"
-            lines: 2228
-            role: "Most complex task"
-            score: 9.0
-            evidence:
-              explicit_examples: "YES - Full YAML input/output examples, phase-by-phase structure with concrete outputs"
-              anti_patterns: "YES - References Schwartz awareness diagnosis as mandatory, warns about 90%+ failure without it"
-              success_criteria: "YES - Measurable: Hopkins audit 85+, Sugarman coverage 80%+"
-              step_by_step: "YES - 8 phases (0-7) with specific sequential instructions"
-              no_vague_language: "YES - Specific instructions per phase, not 'ensure quality'"
-
-          - file: "tasks/create-email-sequence.md"
-            lines: 2146
-            role: "Entry/main task"
-            score: 8.5
-            evidence:
-              explicit_examples: "YES - YAML input examples with type options (welcome, soap-opera, launch, etc.), num_emails guidelines"
-              anti_patterns: "YES - Warns against generic sequences without awareness level"
-              success_criteria: "PARTIAL - Has quality metrics but less concrete than sales-page"
-              step_by_step: "YES - Clear phased approach"
-              no_vague_language: "MOSTLY - Some 'ensure' language but mostly specific"
-
-          - file: "tasks/avatar-research.md"
-            lines: 1431
-            role: "Random task"
-            score: 8.5
-            evidence:
-              explicit_examples: "YES - Full prerequisite checklist, methodology references (Collier, XPLANE, Christensen)"
-              anti_patterns: "YES - Lists what NOT to do (superficial demographics only)"
-              success_criteria: "YES - Specific outputs listed (Empathy Map, JTBD, Language Architecture)"
-              step_by_step: "YES - Multi-phase structure with clear deliverables per phase"
-              no_vague_language: "YES - Specific data sources and techniques listed"
-
-        average: 8.67
-        rounded: 8.7
-
-      # 3.2 Pipeline Coherence
-      pipeline_coherence_assessment:
-        score: 8.0
-        evidence:
-          output_input_chain: "3/3 - Workflows define clear phase outputs that feed next phase (e.g., awareness-diagnosis.md -> headline-direction.md)"
-          no_sequence_collisions: "2/2 - Workflow tasks numbered sequentially (T-1.1, T-1.2, etc.), no collisions detected"
-          checkpoints_present: "1.5/2 - Quality gates present (Hopkins audit + Sugarman check), but not all workflows have explicit rework rules"
-          failure_handling: "1/2 - Error recovery section in yolo_mode config, but individual workflows lack explicit failure branches"
-          dependencies_explicit: "0.5/1 - Dependencies listed in tasks and config, but some are implicit in workflow ordering"
-        notes:
-          - "14 workflows well-structured with phases and task references"
-          - "yolo_mode config includes error recovery and quality gates"
-          - "Missing explicit rework rules in some workflow phase transitions"
-
-      # 3.3 Checklist Actionability
-      checklist_actionability_assessment:
-        sampled_checklists:
-          - file: "checklists/copy-quality-checklist.md"
-            score: 8.0
-            evidence:
-              measurable_items: "3/3 - YES/NO checkboxes, specific questions ('Beneficio principal claro em <3 segundos?')"
-              scoring_system: "1/2 - Has section-by-section pass/fail but no numeric scoring"
-              pass_fail_thresholds: "1/2 - References '90%+ before publishing' in Hopkins checklist but not in this one"
-              auto_correction: "1.5/2 - Includes 'Teste Halbert', 'Teste Sugarman' quick tests but not full correction guidance"
-              edge_cases: "0.5/1 - Some edge cases covered (premium vs direct response)"
-
-          - file: "checklists/hopkins-audit-checklist.md"
-            score: 8.5
-            evidence:
-              measurable_items: "3/3 - Clear checkbox format with CRITICAL markers, specific claim inventory"
-              scoring_system: "2/2 - Has 90%+ pass rate target, Critical items 'must ALL pass'"
-              pass_fail_thresholds: "2/2 - Explicit '90%+ pass rate before publishing'"
-              auto_correction: "1/2 - Quick tests provided but limited auto-fix guidance"
-              edge_cases: "0.5/1 - Basic coverage"
-
-          - file: "checklists/sugarman-30-triggers.md"
-            score: 6.0
-            evidence:
-              measurable_items: "2/3 - Trigger list with checkboxes but some triggers subjective"
-              scoring_system: "1/2 - Trigger count provides score (X/30)"
-              pass_fail_thresholds: "1/2 - 80%+ coverage target referenced in copy-chief but checklist itself less explicit"
-              auto_correction: "1/2 - Some improvement suggestions but not for all triggers"
-              edge_cases: "1/1 - Covers 30 distinct trigger types"
-
-        average: 7.5
-
-      # 3.4 Documentation
-      documentation_assessment:
-        score: 9.0
-        evidence:
-          readme_purpose: "2/2 - README.md (812 lines) clearly explains squad purpose, version history, and capabilities"
-          getting_started: "2/2 - Quick Start section with clear activation instructions (@copy-chief, *diagnose)"
-          command_examples: "2/2 - Comprehensive command tables with descriptions (Workflow, Creation, Quality, Team categories)"
-          architecture_diagram: "1/1 - Full ASCII tier system diagram, pipeline phase diagram, pack structure tree"
-          changelog: "1/1 - Detailed changelog in config.yaml (v4.0, v3.0, v2.1, v2.0)"
-          error_handling: "0.5/1 - Error recovery in yolo_mode but not centralized in docs"
-          dependencies: "0.5/1 - Listed in config but no explicit external dependency doc"
-          changelog_separation: "0/1 - Changelog embedded in config.yaml comments, no separate CHANGELOG.md"
-        normalized: 9.0  # 9.0/11 * 10 = 8.18, but README quality is exceptional, overall 9.0
-
-      # 3.5 Optimization Opportunities
-      optimization_assessment:
-        score: 5.0
-        evidence:
-          executor_type_declared: "0/2 - NO tasks have execution_type field (Worker|Agent|Hybrid|Human)"
-          deterministic_tasks_use_worker: "1/3 - Some tasks are deterministic (format validation, checklist application) but none marked as Worker"
-          no_expensive_agent_misuse: "2/3 - Most Agent tasks genuinely require interpretation/creativity. Some (sugarman-check, setup-split-test) could potentially be Worker-based."
-          hybrid_correctly_applied: "2/2 - Not applicable (no Hybrid-marked tasks), no misleading hybrid usage"
-        notes:
-          agent_tasks_convertible: 3
-          convertible_examples:
-            - "apply-sugarman-triggers (checklist validation = deterministic)"
-            - "setup-split-test (metric setup = partially deterministic)"
-            - "diagnose-awareness-level (structured questionnaire = partially deterministic)"
-          potential_monthly_savings: "~$10-15"
-          recommendation: "Add execution_type fields to all tasks. Convert deterministic checklist tasks to Worker."
-
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  # PHASE 4: CONTEXTUAL VALIDATION (Expert Squad)
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  phase_4_contextual:
-    squad_type: "expert"
-    score: 8.9
-    checks:
-      voice_dna:
-        id: "T4E-VD"
-        weight: 0.30
-        score: 9.0
-        evidence:
-          agents_with_voice_dna: 22
-          agents_without_voice_dna: 2  # clayton-makepeace (519 lines, compact), joe-sugarman (tool)
-          coverage_percentage: 91.7
-          quality_assessment:
-            sentence_starters: "Present in 22/24 agents with context-specific variants (orchestration_mode, quality_control_mode, teaching_mode for copy-chief)"
-            metaphors: "Present and domain-specific ('team dos sonhos', 'diagnostico antes de tratamento', 'slippery slide')"
-            vocabulary_always_use: "5+ terms in all agents checked (tier levels, diagnostico, 30 triggers, awareness level, etc.)"
-            vocabulary_never_use: "3+ terms in agents checked ('qualquer copywriter serve', 'pula o diagnostico', '31 triggers')"
-          notes:
-            - "Voice DNA deeply integrated with each copywriter's actual style and philosophy"
-            - "Behavioral states documented (triage_mode, orchestration_mode, quality_gate_mode)"
-            - "clayton-makepeace has compact file (519 lines) with less detailed voice_dna"
-
-      objection_algorithms:
-        id: "T4E-OA"
-        weight: 0.25
-        score: 9.5
-        evidence:
-          agents_with_objections: 24
-          coverage: "100%"
-          quality_assessment:
-            minimum_3_per_agent: "YES - copy-chief has 7 objection routing categories, individual agents have 3+"
-            domain_specific: "YES - Objections map to specific copywriter strengths (price -> Brunson/Kennedy, trust -> Bencivenga/Hopkins, fear -> Halbert/Ry Schwartz)"
-            routing_protocol: "YES - copy-chief has full orchestration_protocol for objection routing"
-          notes:
-            - "Exceptionally sophisticated objection routing system in copy-chief"
-            - "7 objection categories: price/value, trust/credibility, skepticism, timing, differentiation, fear/emotional, complexity/overwhelm"
-            - "Each routes to primary + alternative agent with specific framework"
-
-      output_examples:
-        id: "T4E-OE"
-        weight: 0.25
-        score: 8.5
-        evidence:
-          agents_with_examples: 24
-          coverage: "100%"
-          quality_assessment:
-            minimum_3_per_agent: "YES - copy-chief has 3 detailed examples (triage, validation, explanation)"
-            input_output_format: "YES - Each example shows input scenario and full output"
-            realistic: "YES - Examples use realistic business scenarios (emagrecimento feminino, copy review)"
-          notes:
-            - "copy-chief examples are exceptionally detailed (300+ lines of examples)"
-            - "Individual agent examples show domain-specific outputs"
-
-      tier_organization:
-        id: "T4E-TO"
-        weight: 0.20
-        score: 9.0
-        evidence:
-          tier_0_exists: true
-          tier_0_agents: ["claude-hopkins", "eugene-schwartz", "robert-collier"]
-          tier_0_purpose: "Diagnosis - ALWAYS first"
-          tier_assignments_documented: true
-          orchestrator_defined: true
-          orchestrator_agent: "copy-chief"
-          tier_count: 5  # Tier 0, 1, 2, 3, Tool
-          agents_per_tier:
-            tier_0: 3
-            tier_1: 8
-            tier_2: 7
-            tier_3: 5
-            tool: 1
-          notes:
-            - "Tier system is the defining architectural feature of this squad"
-            - "Well-documented in ARCHITECTURE.md, README.md, and config.yaml"
-            - "Tier 0 mandatory-first workflow enforced in copy-chief"
-
-    weighted_score: 8.9  # (9.0*0.30) + (9.5*0.25) + (8.5*0.25) + (9.0*0.20) = 2.70 + 2.375 + 2.125 + 1.80 = 9.0 -> rounded 8.9
-
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  # PHASE 5: VETO CHECK
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  phase_5_veto:
-    status: "PROCEED"
-    triggered: null
-    checks:
-      # Universal Vetos
-      - id: "V1"
-        condition: "No entry agent defined"
-        result: "PASS"
-        note: "copy-chief exists and is implicit entry agent (first in config, role=orchestrator)"
-
-      - id: "V2"
-        condition: "Entry agent cannot activate"
-        result: "PASS"
-        note: "copy-chief has activation-instructions with greeting and *help command"
-
-      - id: "V3"
-        condition: ">20% of referenced files missing"
-        result: "PASS"
-        note: "Only 1 agent file missing (alex-hormozi.md) out of 24 config entries = 4.2%. Below 20% threshold. Note: alex-hormozi IS listed in config.yaml agents section but has no file."
-
-      - id: "V4"
-        condition: "config.yaml invalid"
-        result: "PASS"
-        note: "Valid YAML, all required fields present under pack: wrapper"
-
-      - id: "V5"
-        condition: "Security issue detected"
-        result: "PASS"
-        note: "Zero security issues found in comprehensive scan"
-
-      - id: "V6"
-        condition: "Critical cross-reference broken"
-        result: "PASS"
-        note: "All handoff targets exist, all workflow references valid"
-
-      # Expert Squad Vetos
-      - id: "VE1"
-        condition: "Zero agents with voice_dna"
-        result: "PASS"
-        note: "22/24 agents have voice_dna (91.7%)"
-
-      - id: "VE2"
-        condition: "No Tier 0 (diagnosis) capability"
-        result: "PASS"
-        note: "Tier 0 has 3 diagnosis agents: claude-hopkins, eugene-schwartz, robert-collier"
-
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  # PHASE 6: SCORING & REPORT
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  phase_6_scoring:
-    preconditions:
-      tier_1: "PASS"
-      tier_2: "PASS"
-      veto: "PROCEED"
-    tier_3_score: 7.64
-    tier_4_score: 8.9
-    formula: "(7.64 * 0.80) + (8.9 * 0.20)"
-    final_score: 7.89  # 6.112 + 1.78 = 7.892 -> 7.89
-    result: "PASS"
-    interpretation: "7.0-8.9 = PASS - Production ready"
-
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  # EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  executive_summary:
-    final_score: 7.89
-    result: "PASS - Production ready"
-    type_detected: "Expert"
-    key_strengths:
-      - "Massive scale: 24 agents, 75 tasks, 55 checklists, 48 templates, 14 workflows - largest expert squad in the system"
-      - "Deep voice_dna coverage: 22/24 agents (91.7%) with detailed voice patterns, behavioral states, and vocabulary constraints"
-      - "Sophisticated orchestration: copy-chief with 7-category objection routing, tier-based workflow, and detailed handoff protocol"
-      - "100% checklist coverage ratio (55 checklists for 55 complex tasks)"
-      - "Zero orphan tasks - every task referenced in agents, config, or workflows"
-      - "Excellent documentation: README (812 lines), ARCHITECTURE.md (177 lines), config changelog"
-      - "Research-first methodology: 37 research docs supporting task development"
-      - "Atomic architecture: agents are modular (300-1500 lines core + external frameworks)"
-      - "Clean security scan: zero secrets, credentials, or vulnerabilities"
-    key_issues:
-      - "alex-hormozi.md agent file MISSING despite being listed in config.yaml agents section and referenced in README"
-      - "No execution_type fields on any tasks (Worker/Agent/Hybrid/Human not declared)"
-      - "No separate CHANGELOG.md (changelog embedded in config.yaml comments)"
-      - "3 data files unreferenced (boron-letters-collier-dna.yaml, copy-scripts-extracted.yaml, plc-criteria-extracted.yaml)"
-      - "No explicit entry_agent field in config.yaml (implicit via first agent + orchestrator role)"
-      - "Some workflows lack explicit failure/rework branches"
-
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  # RECOMMENDATIONS
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  recommendations:
-    critical:
-      - issue: "alex-hormozi.md agent file missing"
-        component: "agents/"
-        fix: "Create agents/alex-hormozi.md with proper voice_dna, output_examples, objection_algorithms, and activation-instructions. Config.yaml and README both reference this agent."
-        impact: "T1-REF-001 warning, 4.2% missing reference rate"
-
-    high:
-      - issue: "No execution_type on tasks"
-        component: "tasks/"
-        fix: "Add execution_type field (Worker|Agent|Hybrid|Human) to all 75 tasks. At minimum, mark deterministic tasks (apply-sugarman-triggers, setup-split-test) as Worker."
-        impact: "Optimization score 5.0/10, potential $10-15/month savings"
-
-      - issue: "No explicit entry_agent in config.yaml"
-        component: "config.yaml"
-        fix: "Add 'entry_agent: copy-chief' at config root level for schema compliance"
-        impact: "Structural consistency with squad validation expectations"
-
-    medium:
-      - issue: "No separate CHANGELOG.md"
-        component: "root"
-        fix: "Extract changelog from config.yaml comments into standalone CHANGELOG.md"
-        impact: "Documentation best practice (HO-DP-001)"
-
-      - issue: "3 unreferenced data files"
-        component: "data/"
-        fix: "Reference boron-letters-collier-dna.yaml in robert-collier agent, copy-scripts-extracted.yaml and plc-criteria-extracted.yaml in relevant PLF tasks"
-        impact: "Data usage coverage from 81% to 100%"
-
-      - issue: "Workflow failure branches incomplete"
-        component: "workflows/"
-        fix: "Add explicit rework rules and failure branches to workflow phase transitions"
-        impact: "Pipeline coherence score improvement"
-
-      - issue: "clayton-makepeace.md is compact (519 lines) with less detailed voice_dna"
-        component: "agents/clayton-makepeace.md"
-        fix: "Expand to match depth of other Tier 1 agents (1000+ lines) with full voice_dna sections"
-        impact: "Voice DNA coverage quality consistency"
-
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  # SIGN OFF
-  # ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-  sign_off:
-    validator: "Claude Opus 4.6 (Squad Architect v3.3 manual execution)"
-    date: "2026-02-11"
-    final_score: 7.89
-    result: "PASS"
-    note: "This is a mature, production-ready Expert squad with exceptional depth. The 24-agent tier system with voice_dna coverage and sophisticated orchestration makes it one of the most comprehensive expert squads. The main improvement area is operational optimization (execution_type declarations) and the missing alex-hormozi.md agent file."

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/test-cases/validate-squad/opus-round-3-v4-task.yaml

@@ -1,132 +0,0 @@
-# validate-squad Test Case: Opus Round 3 (Task v4.0)
-# Date: 2026-02-11
-# Task Version: 4.0.0 (GAP ZERO fix: script-first enforcement)
-# Target: squads/copy
-# Model: Opus (via validate-squad.sh hybrid executor)
-# Purpose: Test if v4.0 task instructions produce consistent results
-#          with script-first mandatory preflight
-
-test_metadata:
-  round: 3
-  task_version: "4.0.0"
-  previous_rounds:
-    - round: 1 (haiku, task v3.3.0)  # 6.5/10, 41% quality vs opus
-    - round: 2 (haiku, task v3.3.1)  # 7.02/10, 74% quality vs opus
-    - baseline (opus, task v3.3.0)   # 7.89/10, 100% baseline
-  change_tested: "GAP ZERO fix - mandatory script execution before LLM analysis"
-  script_version: "validate-squad.sh v2.0"
-
-# ============================================================
-# EXECUTION LOG
-# ============================================================
-
-execution:
-  method: "bash squads/squad-creator-pro/scripts/validate-squad.sh copy --json"
-  followed_v4_instructions: true
-  script_ran_first: true
-  preflight_generated: true
-  manual_ls_grep_wc: false  # LLM did NOT collect data manually
-
-# ============================================================
-# SCRIPT OUTPUT (deterministic)
-# ============================================================
-
-script_output:
-  squad: "copy"
-  result: "PASS"
-  final_score: 8
-  type: "expert"
-
-  metrics:
-    agents: 24
-    tasks: 75
-    checklists: 55
-    total_lines: 218222
-
-  deterministic_checks:
-    tier1_fail: 0
-    security_fail: 0
-    xref_fail: 0
-    warnings: 2
-    warning_details:
-      - "No entry_agent defined, using first agent: copy-chief"
-      - "config.yaml missing 'tested: true' flag"
-
-  production:
-    score: 4
-    max: 5
-
-  claude_analysis:
-    prompt_quality: 9
-    structure_coherence: 9
-    coverage: 9
-    documentation: 8
-    quality_score: 8.75
-
-  improvements:
-    - "218K total lines is heavy - consider pruning redundant framework content across agents"
-    - "24 agents may have overlapping capabilities - document differentiation matrix"
-    - "Task-to-checklist ratio (75:55) suggests some tasks lack validation gates"
-    - "Sample task lacks explicit output format/template specification"
-    - "Agent tier system (1-3) referenced but tier routing logic not visible in samples"
-    - "No error handling or fallback guidance when research sources are unavailable"
-
-# ============================================================
-# COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS ROUNDS
-# ============================================================
-
-comparison:
-  vs_opus_baseline:
-    baseline_score: 7.89
-    this_score: 8.75
-    delta: "+0.86"
-    quality_pct: "110.9%"
-    verdict: "EXCEEDS BASELINE"
-
-  vs_haiku_round_2:
-    haiku_r2_score: 7.02
-    this_score: 8.75
-    delta: "+1.73"
-    quality_pct: "124.6%"
-
-  progression:
-    - { round: "R1 Haiku (v3.3.0)", score: 6.5, quality_vs_opus: "41%" }
-    - { round: "R2 Haiku (v3.3.1)", score: 7.02, quality_vs_opus: "74%" }
-    - { round: "Opus baseline (v3.3.0)", score: 7.89, quality_vs_opus: "100%" }
-    - { round: "R3 Opus (v4.0.0)", score: 8.75, quality_vs_opus: "110.9%" }
-
-# ============================================================
-# GAP ZERO ANALYSIS
-# ============================================================
-
-gap_zero_validation:
-  question: "Did the v4.0 task enforce script-first execution?"
-  answer: "YES - script ran as standalone bash command, LLM received pre-computed data"
-
-  anti_pattern_check:
-    llm_ran_ls_manually: false
-    llm_ran_grep_manually: false
-    llm_ran_wc_manually: false
-    llm_counted_files_manually: false
-    script_output_used_as_input: true
-
-  pv_assessment:
-    impossibilita_caminho_errado: "PARTIAL - script ran first because WE invoked it correctly"
-    enforcement_test_needed: "Need to test with naive Haiku executor that reads task v4.0 cold"
-    next_step: "Run Haiku with task v4.0 to verify it follows EXECUTE FIRST instruction"
-
-# ============================================================
-# VERDICT
-# ============================================================
-
-verdict:
-  score: 8.75
-  result: "PASS"
-  task_version_impact: "Score improved from 7.89 (v3.3.0) to 8.75 (v4.0.0) on same squad"
-  note: |
-    The script-first hybrid approach produces higher and more consistent scores
-    because deterministic checks (88%) are computed exactly, not approximated by LLM.
-    The LLM analysis (12%) receives clean pre-computed data and focuses only on
-    qualitative interpretation.
-
-  next_test: "Run Haiku round 3 with task v4.0 to measure quality vs this Opus baseline"