code-ai-installer 3.0.0 → 4.0.0

package/domains/content/locales/en/.agents/skills/topic-research/SKILL.md

@@ -1,289 +1,289 @@
----
-name: topic-research
-description: Topic Research — types (quick/standard/deep), search methodology, content gap analysis, minimum requirements, adaptive freshness
----
-# Topic Research
-
-## When to Use
-- When creating **expert-level content** — articles, longreads, data-driven carousels.
-- When **filling out the `$content-brief`** — gathering facts, statistics, and quotes for a specific content piece.
-- When **entering a new topic** — initial deep dive prior to planning the content strategy.
-- When **updating old content** — checking if the data is still relevant and finding fresh insights.
-
-## Input
-
-| Field | Required | Description |
-|-------|:--------:|-------------|
-| Topic | ✅ | Specific research topic (not "marketing", but "ROI of email marketing in B2B SaaS 2025-2026") |
-| Content Brief | ⬚ | From `$content-brief` — if the research is for a specific content piece |
-| Research Type | ✅ | Quick / Standard / Deep Dive (see below) |
-| Audience Persona| ✅ | From `$audience-analysis` — determines the depth and angle of the research |
-| Platform | ⬚ | Influences depth: an Instagram post vs a longread |
-| Key Questions | ⬚ | If the user / Strategist has already defined what needs to be answered |
-
-> If the topic is too broad — **refine** the specific angle before starting. "Email marketing" is not a topic. "Why open rates are dropping in B2B SaaS" is a topic.
-
-## Research Types
-
-| Type | When to use | Depth | Time | Minimums |
-|------|-------------|-------|------|----------|
-| **Quick** | Short post, stories, data meme | Surface: 2-3 key facts | Fast | 3 facts, 2 sources, 0 experts |
-| **Standard** | Post, carousel, email, Telegram | Medium: 5-10 facts, 1-2 experts | Medium| 7 facts, 5 sources, 1 expert |
-| **Deep Dive** | Article, longread, video essay | Deep: 10+ facts, 3+ experts, all angles | Slow | 12 facts, 8 sources, 3 experts, discussion points |
-
-## Search Methodology
-
-### Where to Look
-
-| Source | What to find | Queries/Tools |
-|--------|--------------|---------------|
-| **Academic Databases**| Peer-reviewed studies, meta-analyses | Google Scholar, PubMed, Semantic Scholar |
-| **Industry Reports** | Statistics, trends, forecasts | Statista, Gartner, McKinsey, Deloitte, HubSpot Research |
-| **News Media** | Recent events, reactions | Google News, Reuters, Bloomberg, industry media |
-| **Expert Blogs** | Opinions, case studies, hands-on experience| Industry blogs, Medium, Substack, experts' personal sites |
-| **Social Media** | Opinions, trends, discussions, hot takes | LinkedIn (thought leaders), Twitter/X, Reddit |
-| **YouTube** | Expert breakdowns, conferences, podcasts | YouTube Search, niche podcasts |
-| **Company Data** | Case studies, benchmarks, product data | Official blogs, case studies, press releases |
-| **Gov. Statistics** | Demographics, economy, markets | Census Bureaus, BLS, Eurostat, World Bank |
-
-### Search Strategy
-
-1. **Start broad** — find 2-3 overview articles/reports to understand the landscape.
-2. **Dive into the data** — from the overviews → find the primary statistical sources.
-3. **Find the experts** — who writes/talks about this? What are their positions?
-4. **Spot the contradictions** — are there alternative viewpoints? Ongoing debates?
-5. **Check freshness** — ensure the data is the most recent available.
-
-### Search Query Formulas
-
-| Goal | Query Template |
-|------|----------------|
-| Statistics | `"[topic] statistics 2025"`, `"[topic] data report"` |
-| Trends | `"[topic] trends 2026"`, `"future of [topic]"` |
-| Expert opinions | `"[topic]" site:linkedin.com`, `"[expert]" "[topic]"` |
-| Studies | `"[topic]" site:scholar.google.com`, `"[topic] study research"` |
-| Case studies | `"[topic] case study"`, `"[topic] results"` |
-| Contradictions | `"[topic] myth"`, `"[topic] wrong"`, `"[topic] debate"` |
-
-## Adaptive Freshness
-
-Do not hardcode "2 years" — the threshold depends on the topic:
-
-| Topic Type | Max Data Age | Examples |
-|------------|--------------|----------|
-| **Tech / Digital Mktg** | ≤ 1 year | AI, social media algorithms, SaaS metrics |
-| **Business / Markets** | ≤ 2 years | Market size, consumer behavior |
-| **Science / Med** | ≤ 5 yrs (basics), ≤ 2 yrs (breakthroughs)| Medical guidelines, scientific discoveries |
-| **History / Culture** | No limit (but interpretations should be fresh)| Historical facts, cultural trends |
-| **Legal** | Current legislation (check the date) | Laws, regulations — they could have changed |
-
-> If the data is older than the threshold — **look for fresher data**. If none exists — use it with a disclaimer: "Data from [year], no recent updates found."
-
-## Content Gap Analysis
-
-Before writing — check what already exists:
-
-| Step | Action | Why |
-|------|--------|-----|
-| 1 | Google the topic → examine the top-10 | What is already written? |
-| 2 | Analyze the structure of the top 3-5 | Which subtopics are covered? |
-| 3 | Find **gaps** — what's missing / poorly covered | Our unique contribution |
-| 4 | Check PAA (People Also Ask) | Questions that lack good answers |
-| 5 | Check Reddit / Quora | What questions are real people asking? |
-
-> **Rule:** If the topic is thoroughly covered — find a unique angle: fresh data, a different audience, practical experience, or an unconventional format.
-
-## Protocol
-
-### Step 1 — Preparation
-1. Receive the topic, define the research type (Quick / Standard / Deep Dive).
-2. Refine the angle: narrow and specific.
-3. Formulate **5-10 key questions** the research must answer.
-4. Define the persona → translates to the depth and angle of the research.
-
-### Step 2 — Content Gap Analysis
-1. Check what already exists on the topic (Google Top-10, PAA, Reddit).
-2. Find the gaps — establish our unique contribution.
-3. Document: what we will do better / differently / deeper.
-
-### Step 3 — Fact and Data Gathering
-1. Use the search methodology to gather facts, statistics, and data.
-2. For each fact — document: the value + the source + the year.
-3. Adhere to the freshness threshold based on the topic type.
-4. Reach the minimums defined by the research type.
-
-### Step 4 — Expert Opinions
-1. Find **experts** in the field — who writes, speaks, or researches this.
-2. Collect **quotes** with full attribution (name, title, source).
-3. For a Deep Dive — find at least 3 experts with differing perspectives.
-
-### Step 5 — Discussion Points and Contradictions
-1. Are there **alternative opinions** on the subject?
-2. Are there **myths** we can debunk?
-3. Document: Position A vs Position B — including arguments for both sides.
-
-### Step 6 — Structuring
-1. Group the data by **talking points/theses** (3-7 key points).
-2. Attach supporting facts / statistics / quotes to each point.
-3. Identify the **strongest fact** — this will be the hook / headline base.
-4. Draft an **outline for the copywriter**.
-
-### Step 7 — Handoff for Verification
-1. Transfer all sources to `$source-verification`.
-2. Wait for the verification results.
-3. Replace rejected sources or remove unverified facts.
-
-## Validation (Quality Gate)
-
-The research is complete if:
-
-- [ ] Key questions are formulated and all have been answered
-- [ ] Content Gap Analysis is done (what exists, our unique angle)
-- [ ] Minimums for the research type are met (facts, sources, experts)
-- [ ] All data is within the freshness threshold (based on topic type)
-- [ ] Expert opinions have proper attribution (name, title, source)
-- [ ] Discussion points identified (for Standard and Deep Dive)
-- [ ] Data is structured by talking points + the hook fact is highlighted
-- [ ] Sources handed over to `$source-verification`
-- [ ] Rejected sources are replaced or facts are removed
-
-## Handoff
-
-| Consumer | How it is used |
-|----------|----------------|
-| `$source-verification` | **Mandatory:** verifies all gathered sources |
-| `$data-storytelling` | Facts and data → turned into a narrative |
-| `$content-brief` | Facts, points, the hook → appended to the brief |
-| Copywriter (agent) | Outline + facts → used to write the copy |
-| `$fact-checking` | During the review phase — verifies the facts from the research |
-| `$seo-copywriting` | LSI keywords, PAA questions from the gap analysis |
-
-When transferring — use `$handoff` with the full report attached.
-
-## Integration with other skills
-
-| Skill | Interaction |
-|-------|-------------|
-| `$source-verification` | **Consumer:** reviews all sources |
-| `$data-storytelling` | **Consumer:** receives facts → narrative |
-| `$content-brief` | **Consumer:** populates the brief with research data |
-| `$competitor-content-analysis`| **Complement:** overlapping context during gap analysis |
-| `$audience-analysis` | **Source:** persona dictates the angle/depth of research |
-| `$trend-research` | **Complement:** topic research = deep facts, trend = what's hot right now |
-| `$fact-checking` | **Consumer:** checks the facts during the review stage |
-| `$seo-copywriting` | **Consumer:** uses LSI words, PAA → SEO |
-
-## Anti-patterns
-
-| Mistake | Why it's bad | How to do it right |
-|---------|--------------|--------------------|
-| Topic is too broad | "Marketing" yields 1M results, lacks focus | Narrow the angle: "ROI of email marketing in B2B SaaS 2026" |
-| Stopping at Google Page 1 | 80% of top articles are rewrites of each other | Dig deeper: Scholar, Reddit, experts, primary sources |
-| Facts without sources | Unverifiable, strips trust from content | Every fact = source + year |
-| Old data without a disclaimer | Readers assume it's current | Note the year, always seek fresh data |
-| No Content Gap Analysis | Writing the exact same thing others have | Check top-10, identify gaps |
-| Only providing "Pro" points | One-sided content lacks depth | Present both sides, debunk myths |
-| Deep Dive for an IG post | Overkill, wastes time | Research type = content type |
-| Skipping verification | Unverified facts end up in the text | Always route through `$source-verification` |
-
-## Output Template
-
-```markdown
-### Topic Research — [Topic]
-
-**Type:** [Quick / Standard / Deep Dive]
-**Angle:** [specific angle of the research]
-**Persona:** [from $audience-analysis]
-**Platform / Format:** [where the data will be used]
-**Date of Research:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
-
----
-
-#### Key Questions
-
-| # | Question | Status |
-|---|----------|--------|
-| 1 | [question] | ✅ Answered / ⚠️ Partially / ❌ Not Found |
-| 2 | [question] | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
-| 3 | [question] | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
-
----
-
-#### Content Gap Analysis
-
-**What already exists (Top-5):**
-| # | Source | Volume | What is Covered | What is NOT Covered |
-|---|--------|--------|-----------------|---------------------|
-| 1 | [URL/name] | [N words]| [topics] | [gaps] |
-| 2 | [URL] | [N] | [topics] | [gaps] |
-
-**PAA Questions without good answers:**
-1. [question]
-2. [question]
-
-**Our unique contribution:** [what we will do better / differently / deeper]
-
----
-
-#### Key Facts
-
-| # | Fact | Value | Source | Year | Freshness |
-|---|------|-------|--------|------|-----------|
-| 1 | [fact] | [data] | [source] | [year] | ✅/⚠️ |
-| 2 | [fact] | [data] | [source] | [year] | ✅/⚠️ |
-
-**Hook-fact (for headline):** Fact #[N] — [why it is the strongest]
-
----
-
-#### Statistics
-
-| # | Statistic | Value | Source | Year |
-|---|-----------|-------|--------|------|
-| 1 | [desc.] | [num/%]| [source] | [year] |
-| 2 | [desc.] | [num/%]| [source] | [year] |
-
----
-
-#### Expert Opinions
-
-| # | Expert | Title | Quote | Source |
-|---|--------|-------|-------|--------|
-| 1 | [name] | [title, firm] | "[quote]" | [link / pub] |
-| 2 | [name] | [title] | "[quote]" | [source] |
-
----
-
-#### Discussion Points
-
-| # | Position A | Position B | Arguments A | Arguments B |
-|---|------------|------------|-------------|-------------|
-| 1 | [opinion] | [opinion] | [data] | [data] |
-
-**Myths on the subject (if any):**
-1. **Myth:** [common misconception]
-   **Reality:** [the truth + source]
-
----
-
-#### Copywriter's Outline
-
-| # | Talking Point | Support | Type |
-|---|---------------|---------|------|
-| 1 | [point] | Fact #[N] | Statistic |
-| 2 | [point] | Expert #[N] | Quote |
-| 3 | [point] | Fact #[N] + Stat #[N] | Data + interpretation |
-| 4 | [point] | Discussion #[N] | Contradiction |
-
----
-
-#### Sources (for $source-verification)
-
-| # | Source | URL | Type | Year | Verification Status |
-|---|--------|-----|------|------|---------------------|
-| 1 | [name] | [URL]| [journal/media/blog/report] | [year] | [pending / ✅ / ❌] |
-
-**Total:** [N] sources | **Verified:** [N] | **Rejected:** [N] | **Pending:** [N]
-
-**→ Next Step:** → `$source-verification` (verification) → Copywriter / `$data-storytelling` / `$content-brief`
-```
+---
+name: topic-research
+description: Topic Research — types (quick/standard/deep), search methodology, content gap analysis, minimum requirements, adaptive freshness
+---
+# Topic Research
+
+## When to Use
+- When creating **expert-level content** — articles, longreads, data-driven carousels.
+- When **filling out the `$content-brief`** — gathering facts, statistics, and quotes for a specific content piece.
+- When **entering a new topic** — initial deep dive prior to planning the content strategy.
+- When **updating old content** — checking if the data is still relevant and finding fresh insights.
+
+## Input
+
+| Field | Required | Description |
+|-------|:--------:|-------------|
+| Topic | ✅ | Specific research topic (not "marketing", but "ROI of email marketing in B2B SaaS 2025-2026") |
+| Content Brief | ⬚ | From `$content-brief` — if the research is for a specific content piece |
+| Research Type | ✅ | Quick / Standard / Deep Dive (see below) |
+| Audience Persona| ✅ | From `$audience-analysis` — determines the depth and angle of the research |
+| Platform | ⬚ | Influences depth: an Instagram post vs a longread |
+| Key Questions | ⬚ | If the user / Strategist has already defined what needs to be answered |
+
+> If the topic is too broad — **refine** the specific angle before starting. "Email marketing" is not a topic. "Why open rates are dropping in B2B SaaS" is a topic.
+
+## Research Types
+
+| Type | When to use | Depth | Time | Minimums |
+|------|-------------|-------|------|----------|
+| **Quick** | Short post, stories, data meme | Surface: 2-3 key facts | Fast | 3 facts, 2 sources, 0 experts |
+| **Standard** | Post, carousel, email, Telegram | Medium: 5-10 facts, 1-2 experts | Medium| 7 facts, 5 sources, 1 expert |
+| **Deep Dive** | Article, longread, video essay | Deep: 10+ facts, 3+ experts, all angles | Slow | 12 facts, 8 sources, 3 experts, discussion points |
+
+## Search Methodology
+
+### Where to Look
+
+| Source | What to find | Queries/Tools |
+|--------|--------------|---------------|
+| **Academic Databases**| Peer-reviewed studies, meta-analyses | Google Scholar, PubMed, Semantic Scholar |
+| **Industry Reports** | Statistics, trends, forecasts | Statista, Gartner, McKinsey, Deloitte, HubSpot Research |
+| **News Media** | Recent events, reactions | Google News, Reuters, Bloomberg, industry media |
+| **Expert Blogs** | Opinions, case studies, hands-on experience| Industry blogs, Medium, Substack, experts' personal sites |
+| **Social Media** | Opinions, trends, discussions, hot takes | LinkedIn (thought leaders), Twitter/X, Reddit |
+| **YouTube** | Expert breakdowns, conferences, podcasts | YouTube Search, niche podcasts |
+| **Company Data** | Case studies, benchmarks, product data | Official blogs, case studies, press releases |
+| **Gov. Statistics** | Demographics, economy, markets | Census Bureaus, BLS, Eurostat, World Bank |
+
+### Search Strategy
+
+1. **Start broad** — find 2-3 overview articles/reports to understand the landscape.
+2. **Dive into the data** — from the overviews → find the primary statistical sources.
+3. **Find the experts** — who writes/talks about this? What are their positions?
+4. **Spot the contradictions** — are there alternative viewpoints? Ongoing debates?
+5. **Check freshness** — ensure the data is the most recent available.
+
+### Search Query Formulas
+
+| Goal | Query Template |
+|------|----------------|
+| Statistics | `"[topic] statistics 2025"`, `"[topic] data report"` |
+| Trends | `"[topic] trends 2026"`, `"future of [topic]"` |
+| Expert opinions | `"[topic]" site:linkedin.com`, `"[expert]" "[topic]"` |
+| Studies | `"[topic]" site:scholar.google.com`, `"[topic] study research"` |
+| Case studies | `"[topic] case study"`, `"[topic] results"` |
+| Contradictions | `"[topic] myth"`, `"[topic] wrong"`, `"[topic] debate"` |
+
+## Adaptive Freshness
+
+Do not hardcode "2 years" — the threshold depends on the topic:
+
+| Topic Type | Max Data Age | Examples |
+|------------|--------------|----------|
+| **Tech / Digital Mktg** | ≤ 1 year | AI, social media algorithms, SaaS metrics |
+| **Business / Markets** | ≤ 2 years | Market size, consumer behavior |
+| **Science / Med** | ≤ 5 yrs (basics), ≤ 2 yrs (breakthroughs)| Medical guidelines, scientific discoveries |
+| **History / Culture** | No limit (but interpretations should be fresh)| Historical facts, cultural trends |
+| **Legal** | Current legislation (check the date) | Laws, regulations — they could have changed |
+
+> If the data is older than the threshold — **look for fresher data**. If none exists — use it with a disclaimer: "Data from [year], no recent updates found."
+
+## Content Gap Analysis
+
+Before writing — check what already exists:
+
+| Step | Action | Why |
+|------|--------|-----|
+| 1 | Google the topic → examine the top-10 | What is already written? |
+| 2 | Analyze the structure of the top 3-5 | Which subtopics are covered? |
+| 3 | Find **gaps** — what's missing / poorly covered | Our unique contribution |
+| 4 | Check PAA (People Also Ask) | Questions that lack good answers |
+| 5 | Check Reddit / Quora | What questions are real people asking? |
+
+> **Rule:** If the topic is thoroughly covered — find a unique angle: fresh data, a different audience, practical experience, or an unconventional format.
+
+## Protocol
+
+### Step 1 — Preparation
+1. Receive the topic, define the research type (Quick / Standard / Deep Dive).
+2. Refine the angle: narrow and specific.
+3. Formulate **5-10 key questions** the research must answer.
+4. Define the persona → translates to the depth and angle of the research.
+
+### Step 2 — Content Gap Analysis
+1. Check what already exists on the topic (Google Top-10, PAA, Reddit).
+2. Find the gaps — establish our unique contribution.
+3. Document: what we will do better / differently / deeper.
+
+### Step 3 — Fact and Data Gathering
+1. Use the search methodology to gather facts, statistics, and data.
+2. For each fact — document: the value + the source + the year.
+3. Adhere to the freshness threshold based on the topic type.
+4. Reach the minimums defined by the research type.
+
+### Step 4 — Expert Opinions
+1. Find **experts** in the field — who writes, speaks, or researches this.
+2. Collect **quotes** with full attribution (name, title, source).
+3. For a Deep Dive — find at least 3 experts with differing perspectives.
+
+### Step 5 — Discussion Points and Contradictions
+1. Are there **alternative opinions** on the subject?
+2. Are there **myths** we can debunk?
+3. Document: Position A vs Position B — including arguments for both sides.
+
+### Step 6 — Structuring
+1. Group the data by **talking points/theses** (3-7 key points).
+2. Attach supporting facts / statistics / quotes to each point.
+3. Identify the **strongest fact** — this will be the hook / headline base.
+4. Draft an **outline for the copywriter**.
+
+### Step 7 — Handoff for Verification
+1. Transfer all sources to `$source-verification`.
+2. Wait for the verification results.
+3. Replace rejected sources or remove unverified facts.
+
+## Validation (Quality Gate)
+
+The research is complete if:
+
+- [ ] Key questions are formulated and all have been answered
+- [ ] Content Gap Analysis is done (what exists, our unique angle)
+- [ ] Minimums for the research type are met (facts, sources, experts)
+- [ ] All data is within the freshness threshold (based on topic type)
+- [ ] Expert opinions have proper attribution (name, title, source)
+- [ ] Discussion points identified (for Standard and Deep Dive)
+- [ ] Data is structured by talking points + the hook fact is highlighted
+- [ ] Sources handed over to `$source-verification`
+- [ ] Rejected sources are replaced or facts are removed
+
+## Handoff
+
+| Consumer | How it is used |
+|----------|----------------|
+| `$source-verification` | **Mandatory:** verifies all gathered sources |
+| `$data-storytelling` | Facts and data → turned into a narrative |
+| `$content-brief` | Facts, points, the hook → appended to the brief |
+| Copywriter (agent) | Outline + facts → used to write the copy |
+| `$fact-checking` | During the review phase — verifies the facts from the research |
+| `$seo-copywriting` | LSI keywords, PAA questions from the gap analysis |
+
+When transferring — use `$handoff` with the full report attached.
+
+## Integration with other skills
+
+| Skill | Interaction |
+|-------|-------------|
+| `$source-verification` | **Consumer:** reviews all sources |
+| `$data-storytelling` | **Consumer:** receives facts → narrative |
+| `$content-brief` | **Consumer:** populates the brief with research data |
+| `$competitor-content-analysis`| **Complement:** overlapping context during gap analysis |
+| `$audience-analysis` | **Source:** persona dictates the angle/depth of research |
+| `$trend-research` | **Complement:** topic research = deep facts, trend = what's hot right now |
+| `$fact-checking` | **Consumer:** checks the facts during the review stage |
+| `$seo-copywriting` | **Consumer:** uses LSI words, PAA → SEO |
+
+## Anti-patterns
+
+| Mistake | Why it's bad | How to do it right |
+|---------|--------------|--------------------|
+| Topic is too broad | "Marketing" yields 1M results, lacks focus | Narrow the angle: "ROI of email marketing in B2B SaaS 2026" |
+| Stopping at Google Page 1 | 80% of top articles are rewrites of each other | Dig deeper: Scholar, Reddit, experts, primary sources |
+| Facts without sources | Unverifiable, strips trust from content | Every fact = source + year |
+| Old data without a disclaimer | Readers assume it's current | Note the year, always seek fresh data |
+| No Content Gap Analysis | Writing the exact same thing others have | Check top-10, identify gaps |
+| Only providing "Pro" points | One-sided content lacks depth | Present both sides, debunk myths |
+| Deep Dive for an IG post | Overkill, wastes time | Research type = content type |
+| Skipping verification | Unverified facts end up in the text | Always route through `$source-verification` |
+
+## Output Template
+
+```markdown
+### Topic Research — [Topic]
+
+**Type:** [Quick / Standard / Deep Dive]
+**Angle:** [specific angle of the research]
+**Persona:** [from $audience-analysis]
+**Platform / Format:** [where the data will be used]
+**Date of Research:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
+
+---
+
+#### Key Questions
+
+| # | Question | Status |
+|---|----------|--------|
+| 1 | [question] | ✅ Answered / ⚠️ Partially / ❌ Not Found |
+| 2 | [question] | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
+| 3 | [question] | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
+
+---
+
+#### Content Gap Analysis
+
+**What already exists (Top-5):**
+| # | Source | Volume | What is Covered | What is NOT Covered |
+|---|--------|--------|-----------------|---------------------|
+| 1 | [URL/name] | [N words]| [topics] | [gaps] |
+| 2 | [URL] | [N] | [topics] | [gaps] |
+
+**PAA Questions without good answers:**
+1. [question]
+2. [question]
+
+**Our unique contribution:** [what we will do better / differently / deeper]
+
+---
+
+#### Key Facts
+
+| # | Fact | Value | Source | Year | Freshness |
+|---|------|-------|--------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | [fact] | [data] | [source] | [year] | ✅/⚠️ |
+| 2 | [fact] | [data] | [source] | [year] | ✅/⚠️ |
+
+**Hook-fact (for headline):** Fact #[N] — [why it is the strongest]
+
+---
+
+#### Statistics
+
+| # | Statistic | Value | Source | Year |
+|---|-----------|-------|--------|------|
+| 1 | [desc.] | [num/%]| [source] | [year] |
+| 2 | [desc.] | [num/%]| [source] | [year] |
+
+---
+
+#### Expert Opinions
+
+| # | Expert | Title | Quote | Source |
+|---|--------|-------|-------|--------|
+| 1 | [name] | [title, firm] | "[quote]" | [link / pub] |
+| 2 | [name] | [title] | "[quote]" | [source] |
+
+---
+
+#### Discussion Points
+
+| # | Position A | Position B | Arguments A | Arguments B |
+|---|------------|------------|-------------|-------------|
+| 1 | [opinion] | [opinion] | [data] | [data] |
+
+**Myths on the subject (if any):**
+1. **Myth:** [common misconception]
+   **Reality:** [the truth + source]
+
+---
+
+#### Copywriter's Outline
+
+| # | Talking Point | Support | Type |
+|---|---------------|---------|------|
+| 1 | [point] | Fact #[N] | Statistic |
+| 2 | [point] | Expert #[N] | Quote |
+| 3 | [point] | Fact #[N] + Stat #[N] | Data + interpretation |
+| 4 | [point] | Discussion #[N] | Contradiction |
+
+---
+
+#### Sources (for $source-verification)
+
+| # | Source | URL | Type | Year | Verification Status |
+|---|--------|-----|------|------|---------------------|
+| 1 | [name] | [URL]| [journal/media/blog/report] | [year] | [pending / ✅ / ❌] |
+
+**Total:** [N] sources | **Verified:** [N] | **Rejected:** [N] | **Pending:** [N]
+
+**→ Next Step:** → `$source-verification` (verification) → Copywriter / `$data-storytelling` / `$content-brief`
+```