@mytechtoday/augment-extensions 0.7.0 → 1.2.0

package/augment-extensions/writing-standards/screenplay/styles/rules/satirical.md

@@ -1,499 +1,499 @@
-# Satirical Narrative Style
-
-**Category**: Screenplay Narrative Style  
-**Type**: Tonal  
-**Complexity**: High
-
-## Overview
-
-Satirical narrative uses humor, irony, exaggeration, and ridicule to expose and criticize societal flaws, human folly, or institutional absurdity. This style combines entertainment with social commentary, using comedy as a vehicle for critique.
-
-## Core Concept
-
-Satirical screenwriting weaponizes humor to illuminate truth about society, politics, culture, or human nature. The power lies in making audiences laugh while simultaneously making them think, using exaggeration and absurdity to reveal underlying realities. Success requires sharp observation, wit, and the courage to offend in service of truth.
-
-## Definition
-
-A satirical narrative employs irony, sarcasm, exaggeration, and ridicule to expose and criticize foolishness, corruption, or absurdity in individuals, institutions, or society, typically with the intent to provoke change or awareness.
-
-## Structural Requirements
-
-### Requirement 1: Clear Target
-
-**Description**: Satire must have a specific target—an institution, behavior, ideology, or societal norm being critiqued.
-
-**Why It Matters**: Unfocused satire becomes mere comedy without purpose or impact.
-
-**Implementation**:
-- Identify specific subject of critique
-- Maintain consistent focus on target
-- Ensure audience understands what's being satirized
-- Avoid scattershot approach
-
-**Examples**:
-- ✅ **Good**: Satirizing corporate greed through exaggerated CEO character
-- ❌ **Bad**: Random jokes about various topics with no unifying critique
-
-**Film Reference**: Dr. Strangelove (1964) - Laser-focused satire of Cold War nuclear policy.
-
----
-
-### Requirement 2: Exaggeration and Absurdity
-
-**Description**: Amplify real-world absurdities to comic extremes while maintaining recognizable truth.
-
-**Why It Matters**: Exaggeration reveals truth by making the ridiculous obvious.
-
-**Implementation**:
-- Take real behaviors to logical extremes
-- Create absurd situations rooted in reality
-- Use hyperbole to illuminate truth
-- Maintain internal logic within absurdity
-
-**Examples**:
-- ✅ **Good**: Corporate meeting where executives discuss profit over human lives with cheerful enthusiasm
-- ❌ **Bad**: Random absurdity with no connection to real-world critique
-
-**Film Reference**: Idiocracy (2006) - Exaggerates anti-intellectualism to absurd future extreme.
-
----
-
-### Requirement 3: Irony and Contradiction
-
-**Description**: Highlight contradictions between stated values and actual behavior, or between appearance and reality.
-
-**Why It Matters**: Irony exposes hypocrisy and reveals uncomfortable truths.
-
-**Implementation**:
-- Show gap between rhetoric and action
-- Create situations where characters' words contradict deeds
-- Use dramatic irony where audience knows more than characters
-- Employ verbal irony and sarcasm
-
-**Examples**:
-- ✅ **Good**: Politician giving speech about family values while cheating on spouse
-- ❌ **Bad**: Straightforward presentation without ironic contrast
-
-**Film Reference**: Thank You for Smoking (2005) - Tobacco lobbyist's rhetoric contradicts obvious truth.
-
----
-
-### Requirement 4: Social Commentary
-
-**Description**: Satire must offer genuine insight or critique, not just jokes.
-
-**Why It Matters**: Without meaningful commentary, satire becomes empty parody.
-
-**Implementation**:
-- Ground humor in observable social reality
-- Offer perspective on real issues
-- Make audience think while they laugh
-- Avoid preaching; let satire speak for itself
-
-**Examples**:
-- ✅ **Good**: Satirizing healthcare system through absurd insurance bureaucracy
-- ❌ **Bad**: Jokes about healthcare with no actual critique
-
-**Film Reference**: Network (1976) - Satirizes television industry's exploitation and sensationalism.
-
----
-
-### Requirement 5: Wit and Intelligence
-
-**Description**: Satirical dialogue and situations must demonstrate sharp observation and clever construction.
-
-**Why It Matters**: Dumb satire undermines its own critique.
-
-**Implementation**:
-- Use wordplay, double meanings, and clever dialogue
-- Create situations that reveal absurdity through logic
-- Demonstrate knowledge of subject being satirized
-- Respect audience intelligence
-
-**Examples**:
-- ✅ **Good**: Clever dialogue that works on multiple levels
-- ❌ **Bad**: Obvious, heavy-handed jokes that insult audience intelligence
-
-**Film Reference**: In the Loop (2009) - Rapid-fire witty dialogue satirizes political spin.
-
----
-
-### Requirement 6: Tone Balance
-
-**Description**: Balance humor with critique, ensuring satire doesn't become either toothless comedy or preachy sermon.
-
-**Why It Matters**: Too light loses impact; too heavy loses audience.
-
-**Implementation**:
-- Keep humor sharp but not cruel
-- Maintain entertainment value while critiquing
-- Avoid becoming didactic or preachy
-- Let absurdity speak for itself
-
-**Examples**:
-- ✅ **Good**: Funny scenes that also make pointed social commentary
-- ❌ **Bad**: Characters delivering speeches about what's wrong with society
-
-**Film Reference**: The Big Short (2015) - Balances humor with serious critique of financial crisis.
-
----
-
-## Pacing Guidelines
-
-### Overall Rhythm
-
-- Quick, energetic pacing to maintain comedic momentum
-- Rapid-fire dialogue and situations
-- Build absurdity progressively
-- Accelerate toward climactic satirical payoff
-
-### Scene Length
-
-- Shorter scenes (2-3 pages) to maintain energy
-- Quick cuts between satirical vignettes
-- Avoid lingering too long on single joke
-- Move swiftly to next target
-
-### Act Structure
-
-- **Act I**: Establish satirical world and targets (25% of runtime)
-- **Act II**: Escalate absurdity and deepen critique (50% of runtime)
-- **Act III**: Bring satire to logical extreme conclusion (25% of runtime)
-
-### Transitions
-
-- Quick cuts between scenes
-- Ironic juxtapositions
-- Montages showing absurdity
-- Abrupt shifts for comic effect
-
-## Visual Storytelling
-
-### Camera Work
-
-- Can range from naturalistic to stylized
-- Use framing to emphasize absurdity
-- Visual irony through composition
-- Deadpan presentation of ridiculous situations
-
-### Visual Motifs
-
-- Symbolic imagery representing critique
-- Visual exaggeration of real-world elements
-- Recurring visual gags
-- Production design that satirizes target
-
-### Action Lines
-
-- Describe absurd situations matter-of-factly
-- Note ironic visual details
-- Maintain satirical tone in prose
-- Highlight contradictions visually
-
-**Example**:
-```
-INT. CORPORATE BOARDROOM - DAY
-
-Executives in $5,000 suits discuss layoffs while eating catered lunch from a Michelin-starred restaurant.
-
-CEO
-We need to tighten our belts. Starting with the janitorial staff.
-
-He takes a bite of $200 wagyu beef.
-```
-
-## Dialogue Approach
-
-### Dialogue Style
-
-- Sharp, witty, often rapid-fire
-- Characters speak in revealing contradictions
-- Jargon and buzzwords satirized
-- Verbal irony and sarcasm
-
-### Subtext
-
-- Characters often unaware of their own absurdity
-- Dramatic irony from audience awareness
-- What's not said reveals hypocrisy
-- Subtext exposes contradictions
-
-### Formatting
-
-- Standard formatting with punchy dialogue
-- Quick exchanges
-- Overlapping speech for chaos
-- Minimal parentheticals
-
-**Example**:
-```
-SENATOR
-I'm deeply committed to transparency.
-
-AIDE
-(whispering)
-The press is asking about the offshore accounts.
-
-SENATOR
-(to press)
-No further questions at this time.
-```
-
-## Technical Formatting
-
-### Page Layout
-
-- Standard screenplay format
-- Quick scene changes
-- Clear satirical targets
-- Energetic pacing on page
-
-### Scene Headings
-
-- Specific locations that enhance satire
-- Ironic location choices
-- Frequent scene changes
-- Varied settings
-
-### Special Elements
-
-- MONTAGE for satirical sequences
-- INTERCUT for ironic parallels
-- TITLE CARDS for satirical commentary
-- ON-SCREEN TEXT for ironic statistics
-
-## Strengths and Limitations
-
-### Strengths
-
-- Combines entertainment with social commentary
-- Makes difficult subjects accessible through humor
-- Can say things straight drama cannot
-- Engages audiences intellectually and emotionally
-- Memorable and quotable
-
-### Limitations
-
-- Risk of dating quickly as targets change
-- Can alienate audiences who disagree with critique
-- Difficult to balance humor and message
-- May be dismissed as "just comedy"
-- Requires sophisticated audience
-
-### Best Use Cases
-
-- Political and social commentary
-- Corporate and institutional critique
-- Media and entertainment industry satire
-- Cultural phenomenon examination
-- Exposing hypocrisy and absurdity
-
-## Film Examples
-
-### Example 1: Dr. Strangelove (1964)
-
-**Director**: Stanley Kubrick
-
-**Why This Style Works**: Absurdist satire of Cold War nuclear policy reveals madness of mutually assured destruction through exaggerated characters and situations.
-
-**Key Stylistic Moments**:
-- **War Room**: Generals discuss nuclear war with bureaucratic banality
-- **Character Names**: General Jack D. Ripper, Dr. Strangelove—satirical from the start
-- **Ending**: Apocalypse presented as darkly comic inevitability
-
-**Techniques Used**:
-- Deadpan delivery of absurd dialogue
-- Exaggerated characters representing real attitudes
-- Visual irony (war room as mundane office)
-- Escalating absurdity to logical extreme
-
-**Structural Analysis**: Takes real Cold War anxieties to absurd extreme, revealing underlying madness through comedy.
-
----
-
-### Example 2: Network (1976)
-
-**Director**: Sidney Lumet
-
-**Why This Style Works**: Satirizes television industry's exploitation and sensationalism, predicting reality TV and infotainment.
-
-**Key Stylistic Moments**:
-- **"I'm mad as hell" speech**: Genuine anger commodified for ratings
-- **Executive meetings**: Profit prioritized over ethics with cheerful enthusiasm
-- **Assassination as entertainment**: Logical extreme of ratings-driven programming
-
-**Techniques Used**:
-- Exaggeration of real industry practices
-- Characters unaware of their own absurdity
-- Prophetic satire that became reality
-- Sharp, witty dialogue
-
-**Structural Analysis**: Escalates from realistic to absurd, showing how profit motive corrupts journalism.
-
----
-
-### Example 3: Thank You for Smoking (2005)
-
-**Director**: Jason Reitman
-
-**Why This Style Works**: Satirizes spin culture and lobbying through charismatic tobacco lobbyist who defends the indefensible.
-
-**Key Stylistic Moments**:
-- **MOD Squad**: Lobbyists for tobacco, alcohol, firearms bond over shared amorality
-- **Talk show debate**: Protagonist wins argument despite being obviously wrong
-- **Son's education**: Teaching child to manipulate truth
-
-**Techniques Used**:
-- Charismatic protagonist doing terrible things
-- Witty dialogue that reveals hypocrisy
-- No one smokes in film about tobacco lobbying (ironic choice)
-- Satirizes rhetoric and spin, not just tobacco
-
-**Structural Analysis**: Uses likable protagonist to satirize how rhetoric can defend anything.
-
----
-
-### Example 4: The Big Short (2015)
-
-**Director**: Adam McKay
-
-**Why This Style Works**: Makes complex financial crisis accessible through satirical approach, breaking fourth wall and using celebrity cameos to explain concepts.
-
-**Key Stylistic Moments**:
-- **Celebrity cameos**: Margot Robbie in bathtub explains subprime mortgages
-- **Fourth wall breaks**: Characters address audience directly
-- **Absurd meetings**: Bankers' obliviousness to impending disaster
-
-**Techniques Used**:
-- Satirical explanations of complex topics
-- Ironic contrast between characters' knowledge and bankers' ignorance
-- Dark humor about real tragedy
-- Innovative narrative techniques
-
-**Structural Analysis**: Satirizes financial industry while educating audience about 2008 crisis.
-
----
-
-### Example 5: In the Loop (2009)
-
-**Director**: Armando Iannucci
-
-**Why This Style Works**: Rapid-fire satirical dialogue exposes political spin and bureaucratic absurdity around Iraq War.
-
-**Key Stylistic Moments**:
-- **Profane tirades**: Malcolm Tucker's creative insults
-- **Spin meetings**: Truth manipulated for political advantage
-- **War as bureaucratic process**: Life-and-death decisions made casually
-
-**Techniques Used**:
-- Extremely fast-paced dialogue
-- Improvised feel with scripted precision
-- Characters' obliviousness to their own absurdity
-- Handheld camera for documentary realism
-
-**Structural Analysis**: Satirizes how war decisions are made through bureaucratic incompetence and political spin.
-
----
-
-## Integration with Other Features
-
-### Compatible Genres
-
-- **Comedy**: Natural fit for satirical approach
-- **Drama**: Dark satire can be dramatic
-- **Thriller**: Satirical thrillers expose systemic issues
-- **Science Fiction**: Dystopian satire (Idiocracy, Brazil)
-- **Political**: Natural target for satire
-
-### Compatible Themes
-
-- **Power and Corruption**: Satire exposes abuse
-- **Hypocrisy**: Perfect target for satirical treatment
-- **Greed**: Corporate satire reveals excess
-- **Media Manipulation**: Satire of spin and propaganda
-- **Social Inequality**: Satirical lens on class issues
-
-### Style Variations
-
-- **Absurdist satire**: Extreme exaggeration (Dr. Strangelove)
-- **Deadpan satire**: Straight-faced presentation (Office Space)
-- **Dark satire**: Serious subjects with satirical edge (The Big Short)
-- **Farcical satire**: Broad, physical comedy with satirical intent
-
-## Common Pitfalls
-
-### Pitfall 1: Preaching Instead of Satirizing
-
-**Problem**: Characters deliver speeches about what's wrong instead of showing it through satire.
-
-**Solution**: Let absurdity speak for itself. Show, don't tell, what's wrong.
-
-**Example**: Network shows television's corruption through action, not speeches about it.
-
----
-
-### Pitfall 2: Toothless Satire
-
-**Problem**: Satire becomes so gentle it loses all bite and impact.
-
-**Solution**: Be willing to offend in service of truth. Satire should have edge.
-
-**Example**: Dr. Strangelove doesn't pull punches about nuclear war absurdity.
-
----
-
-### Pitfall 3: Unclear Target
-
-**Problem**: Audience can't tell what's being satirized or why.
-
-**Solution**: Maintain clear focus on specific target. Make critique obvious.
-
-**Example**: Thank You for Smoking clearly satirizes spin culture and lobbying.
-
----
-
-### Pitfall 4: Mean-Spirited Cruelty
-
-**Problem**: Satire becomes cruel mockery without insight or purpose.
-
-**Solution**: Satirize institutions and behaviors, not individuals. Maintain humanity.
-
-**Example**: In the Loop satirizes political system, not specific real politicians.
-
----
-
-### Pitfall 5: Dating Quickly
-
-**Problem**: Topical satire becomes irrelevant as targets change.
-
-**Solution**: Focus on timeless human folly and institutional problems, not just current events.
-
-**Example**: Network remains relevant decades later because it satirizes timeless media issues.
-
----
-
-## Best Practices
-
-1. **Know your target** - Research what you're satirizing thoroughly
-2. **Exaggerate truthfully** - Base absurdity on real observations
-3. **Maintain internal logic** - Even absurd worlds need consistent rules
-4. **Balance humor and critique** - Entertain while making points
-5. **Respect audience intelligence** - Trust them to get the satire
-6. **Be fearless** - Satire requires courage to offend
-7. **Show, don't preach** - Let situations reveal absurdity
-8. **Find universal truths** - Satirize timeless human folly
-
-## Resources
-
-- "Satire: A Critical Reintroduction" by Dustin Griffin - Theory of satire
-- "The Anatomy of Satire" by Gilbert Highet - Classical satirical techniques
-- "Dr. Strangelove" screenplay by Stanley Kubrick, Terry Southern, Peter George - Master class
-- "Network" screenplay by Paddy Chayefsky - Prophetic media satire
-- "In the Loop" screenplay by Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci, Tony Roche - Political satire
-
----
-
-**Depth Coverage**: 85%
-**Last Updated**: 2026-01-31
-**Version**: 1.0.0
-
+# Satirical Narrative Style
+
+**Category**: Screenplay Narrative Style  
+**Type**: Tonal  
+**Complexity**: High
+
+## Overview
+
+Satirical narrative uses humor, irony, exaggeration, and ridicule to expose and criticize societal flaws, human folly, or institutional absurdity. This style combines entertainment with social commentary, using comedy as a vehicle for critique.
+
+## Core Concept
+
+Satirical screenwriting weaponizes humor to illuminate truth about society, politics, culture, or human nature. The power lies in making audiences laugh while simultaneously making them think, using exaggeration and absurdity to reveal underlying realities. Success requires sharp observation, wit, and the courage to offend in service of truth.
+
+## Definition
+
+A satirical narrative employs irony, sarcasm, exaggeration, and ridicule to expose and criticize foolishness, corruption, or absurdity in individuals, institutions, or society, typically with the intent to provoke change or awareness.
+
+## Structural Requirements
+
+### Requirement 1: Clear Target
+
+**Description**: Satire must have a specific target—an institution, behavior, ideology, or societal norm being critiqued.
+
+**Why It Matters**: Unfocused satire becomes mere comedy without purpose or impact.
+
+**Implementation**:
+- Identify specific subject of critique
+- Maintain consistent focus on target
+- Ensure audience understands what's being satirized
+- Avoid scattershot approach
+
+**Examples**:
+- ✅ **Good**: Satirizing corporate greed through exaggerated CEO character
+- ❌ **Bad**: Random jokes about various topics with no unifying critique
+
+**Film Reference**: Dr. Strangelove (1964) - Laser-focused satire of Cold War nuclear policy.
+
+---
+
+### Requirement 2: Exaggeration and Absurdity
+
+**Description**: Amplify real-world absurdities to comic extremes while maintaining recognizable truth.
+
+**Why It Matters**: Exaggeration reveals truth by making the ridiculous obvious.
+
+**Implementation**:
+- Take real behaviors to logical extremes
+- Create absurd situations rooted in reality
+- Use hyperbole to illuminate truth
+- Maintain internal logic within absurdity
+
+**Examples**:
+- ✅ **Good**: Corporate meeting where executives discuss profit over human lives with cheerful enthusiasm
+- ❌ **Bad**: Random absurdity with no connection to real-world critique
+
+**Film Reference**: Idiocracy (2006) - Exaggerates anti-intellectualism to absurd future extreme.
+
+---
+
+### Requirement 3: Irony and Contradiction
+
+**Description**: Highlight contradictions between stated values and actual behavior, or between appearance and reality.
+
+**Why It Matters**: Irony exposes hypocrisy and reveals uncomfortable truths.
+
+**Implementation**:
+- Show gap between rhetoric and action
+- Create situations where characters' words contradict deeds
+- Use dramatic irony where audience knows more than characters
+- Employ verbal irony and sarcasm
+
+**Examples**:
+- ✅ **Good**: Politician giving speech about family values while cheating on spouse
+- ❌ **Bad**: Straightforward presentation without ironic contrast
+
+**Film Reference**: Thank You for Smoking (2005) - Tobacco lobbyist's rhetoric contradicts obvious truth.
+
+---
+
+### Requirement 4: Social Commentary
+
+**Description**: Satire must offer genuine insight or critique, not just jokes.
+
+**Why It Matters**: Without meaningful commentary, satire becomes empty parody.
+
+**Implementation**:
+- Ground humor in observable social reality
+- Offer perspective on real issues
+- Make audience think while they laugh
+- Avoid preaching; let satire speak for itself
+
+**Examples**:
+- ✅ **Good**: Satirizing healthcare system through absurd insurance bureaucracy
+- ❌ **Bad**: Jokes about healthcare with no actual critique
+
+**Film Reference**: Network (1976) - Satirizes television industry's exploitation and sensationalism.
+
+---
+
+### Requirement 5: Wit and Intelligence
+
+**Description**: Satirical dialogue and situations must demonstrate sharp observation and clever construction.
+
+**Why It Matters**: Dumb satire undermines its own critique.
+
+**Implementation**:
+- Use wordplay, double meanings, and clever dialogue
+- Create situations that reveal absurdity through logic
+- Demonstrate knowledge of subject being satirized
+- Respect audience intelligence
+
+**Examples**:
+- ✅ **Good**: Clever dialogue that works on multiple levels
+- ❌ **Bad**: Obvious, heavy-handed jokes that insult audience intelligence
+
+**Film Reference**: In the Loop (2009) - Rapid-fire witty dialogue satirizes political spin.
+
+---
+
+### Requirement 6: Tone Balance
+
+**Description**: Balance humor with critique, ensuring satire doesn't become either toothless comedy or preachy sermon.
+
+**Why It Matters**: Too light loses impact; too heavy loses audience.
+
+**Implementation**:
+- Keep humor sharp but not cruel
+- Maintain entertainment value while critiquing
+- Avoid becoming didactic or preachy
+- Let absurdity speak for itself
+
+**Examples**:
+- ✅ **Good**: Funny scenes that also make pointed social commentary
+- ❌ **Bad**: Characters delivering speeches about what's wrong with society
+
+**Film Reference**: The Big Short (2015) - Balances humor with serious critique of financial crisis.
+
+---
+
+## Pacing Guidelines
+
+### Overall Rhythm
+
+- Quick, energetic pacing to maintain comedic momentum
+- Rapid-fire dialogue and situations
+- Build absurdity progressively
+- Accelerate toward climactic satirical payoff
+
+### Scene Length
+
+- Shorter scenes (2-3 pages) to maintain energy
+- Quick cuts between satirical vignettes
+- Avoid lingering too long on single joke
+- Move swiftly to next target
+
+### Act Structure
+
+- **Act I**: Establish satirical world and targets (25% of runtime)
+- **Act II**: Escalate absurdity and deepen critique (50% of runtime)
+- **Act III**: Bring satire to logical extreme conclusion (25% of runtime)
+
+### Transitions
+
+- Quick cuts between scenes
+- Ironic juxtapositions
+- Montages showing absurdity
+- Abrupt shifts for comic effect
+
+## Visual Storytelling
+
+### Camera Work
+
+- Can range from naturalistic to stylized
+- Use framing to emphasize absurdity
+- Visual irony through composition
+- Deadpan presentation of ridiculous situations
+
+### Visual Motifs
+
+- Symbolic imagery representing critique
+- Visual exaggeration of real-world elements
+- Recurring visual gags
+- Production design that satirizes target
+
+### Action Lines
+
+- Describe absurd situations matter-of-factly
+- Note ironic visual details
+- Maintain satirical tone in prose
+- Highlight contradictions visually
+
+**Example**:
+```
+INT. CORPORATE BOARDROOM - DAY
+
+Executives in $5,000 suits discuss layoffs while eating catered lunch from a Michelin-starred restaurant.
+
+CEO
+We need to tighten our belts. Starting with the janitorial staff.
+
+He takes a bite of $200 wagyu beef.
+```
+
+## Dialogue Approach
+
+### Dialogue Style
+
+- Sharp, witty, often rapid-fire
+- Characters speak in revealing contradictions
+- Jargon and buzzwords satirized
+- Verbal irony and sarcasm
+
+### Subtext
+
+- Characters often unaware of their own absurdity
+- Dramatic irony from audience awareness
+- What's not said reveals hypocrisy
+- Subtext exposes contradictions
+
+### Formatting
+
+- Standard formatting with punchy dialogue
+- Quick exchanges
+- Overlapping speech for chaos
+- Minimal parentheticals
+
+**Example**:
+```
+SENATOR
+I'm deeply committed to transparency.
+
+AIDE
+(whispering)
+The press is asking about the offshore accounts.
+
+SENATOR
+(to press)
+No further questions at this time.
+```
+
+## Technical Formatting
+
+### Page Layout
+
+- Standard screenplay format
+- Quick scene changes
+- Clear satirical targets
+- Energetic pacing on page
+
+### Scene Headings
+
+- Specific locations that enhance satire
+- Ironic location choices
+- Frequent scene changes
+- Varied settings
+
+### Special Elements
+
+- MONTAGE for satirical sequences
+- INTERCUT for ironic parallels
+- TITLE CARDS for satirical commentary
+- ON-SCREEN TEXT for ironic statistics
+
+## Strengths and Limitations
+
+### Strengths
+
+- Combines entertainment with social commentary
+- Makes difficult subjects accessible through humor
+- Can say things straight drama cannot
+- Engages audiences intellectually and emotionally
+- Memorable and quotable
+
+### Limitations
+
+- Risk of dating quickly as targets change
+- Can alienate audiences who disagree with critique
+- Difficult to balance humor and message
+- May be dismissed as "just comedy"
+- Requires sophisticated audience
+
+### Best Use Cases
+
+- Political and social commentary
+- Corporate and institutional critique
+- Media and entertainment industry satire
+- Cultural phenomenon examination
+- Exposing hypocrisy and absurdity
+
+## Film Examples
+
+### Example 1: Dr. Strangelove (1964)
+
+**Director**: Stanley Kubrick
+
+**Why This Style Works**: Absurdist satire of Cold War nuclear policy reveals madness of mutually assured destruction through exaggerated characters and situations.
+
+**Key Stylistic Moments**:
+- **War Room**: Generals discuss nuclear war with bureaucratic banality
+- **Character Names**: General Jack D. Ripper, Dr. Strangelove—satirical from the start
+- **Ending**: Apocalypse presented as darkly comic inevitability
+
+**Techniques Used**:
+- Deadpan delivery of absurd dialogue
+- Exaggerated characters representing real attitudes
+- Visual irony (war room as mundane office)
+- Escalating absurdity to logical extreme
+
+**Structural Analysis**: Takes real Cold War anxieties to absurd extreme, revealing underlying madness through comedy.
+
+---
+
+### Example 2: Network (1976)
+
+**Director**: Sidney Lumet
+
+**Why This Style Works**: Satirizes television industry's exploitation and sensationalism, predicting reality TV and infotainment.
+
+**Key Stylistic Moments**:
+- **"I'm mad as hell" speech**: Genuine anger commodified for ratings
+- **Executive meetings**: Profit prioritized over ethics with cheerful enthusiasm
+- **Assassination as entertainment**: Logical extreme of ratings-driven programming
+
+**Techniques Used**:
+- Exaggeration of real industry practices
+- Characters unaware of their own absurdity
+- Prophetic satire that became reality
+- Sharp, witty dialogue
+
+**Structural Analysis**: Escalates from realistic to absurd, showing how profit motive corrupts journalism.
+
+---
+
+### Example 3: Thank You for Smoking (2005)
+
+**Director**: Jason Reitman
+
+**Why This Style Works**: Satirizes spin culture and lobbying through charismatic tobacco lobbyist who defends the indefensible.
+
+**Key Stylistic Moments**:
+- **MOD Squad**: Lobbyists for tobacco, alcohol, firearms bond over shared amorality
+- **Talk show debate**: Protagonist wins argument despite being obviously wrong
+- **Son's education**: Teaching child to manipulate truth
+
+**Techniques Used**:
+- Charismatic protagonist doing terrible things
+- Witty dialogue that reveals hypocrisy
+- No one smokes in film about tobacco lobbying (ironic choice)
+- Satirizes rhetoric and spin, not just tobacco
+
+**Structural Analysis**: Uses likable protagonist to satirize how rhetoric can defend anything.
+
+---
+
+### Example 4: The Big Short (2015)
+
+**Director**: Adam McKay
+
+**Why This Style Works**: Makes complex financial crisis accessible through satirical approach, breaking fourth wall and using celebrity cameos to explain concepts.
+
+**Key Stylistic Moments**:
+- **Celebrity cameos**: Margot Robbie in bathtub explains subprime mortgages
+- **Fourth wall breaks**: Characters address audience directly
+- **Absurd meetings**: Bankers' obliviousness to impending disaster
+
+**Techniques Used**:
+- Satirical explanations of complex topics
+- Ironic contrast between characters' knowledge and bankers' ignorance
+- Dark humor about real tragedy
+- Innovative narrative techniques
+
+**Structural Analysis**: Satirizes financial industry while educating audience about 2008 crisis.
+
+---
+
+### Example 5: In the Loop (2009)
+
+**Director**: Armando Iannucci
+
+**Why This Style Works**: Rapid-fire satirical dialogue exposes political spin and bureaucratic absurdity around Iraq War.
+
+**Key Stylistic Moments**:
+- **Profane tirades**: Malcolm Tucker's creative insults
+- **Spin meetings**: Truth manipulated for political advantage
+- **War as bureaucratic process**: Life-and-death decisions made casually
+
+**Techniques Used**:
+- Extremely fast-paced dialogue
+- Improvised feel with scripted precision
+- Characters' obliviousness to their own absurdity
+- Handheld camera for documentary realism
+
+**Structural Analysis**: Satirizes how war decisions are made through bureaucratic incompetence and political spin.
+
+---
+
+## Integration with Other Features
+
+### Compatible Genres
+
+- **Comedy**: Natural fit for satirical approach
+- **Drama**: Dark satire can be dramatic
+- **Thriller**: Satirical thrillers expose systemic issues
+- **Science Fiction**: Dystopian satire (Idiocracy, Brazil)
+- **Political**: Natural target for satire
+
+### Compatible Themes
+
+- **Power and Corruption**: Satire exposes abuse
+- **Hypocrisy**: Perfect target for satirical treatment
+- **Greed**: Corporate satire reveals excess
+- **Media Manipulation**: Satire of spin and propaganda
+- **Social Inequality**: Satirical lens on class issues
+
+### Style Variations
+
+- **Absurdist satire**: Extreme exaggeration (Dr. Strangelove)
+- **Deadpan satire**: Straight-faced presentation (Office Space)
+- **Dark satire**: Serious subjects with satirical edge (The Big Short)
+- **Farcical satire**: Broad, physical comedy with satirical intent
+
+## Common Pitfalls
+
+### Pitfall 1: Preaching Instead of Satirizing
+
+**Problem**: Characters deliver speeches about what's wrong instead of showing it through satire.
+
+**Solution**: Let absurdity speak for itself. Show, don't tell, what's wrong.
+
+**Example**: Network shows television's corruption through action, not speeches about it.
+
+---
+
+### Pitfall 2: Toothless Satire
+
+**Problem**: Satire becomes so gentle it loses all bite and impact.
+
+**Solution**: Be willing to offend in service of truth. Satire should have edge.
+
+**Example**: Dr. Strangelove doesn't pull punches about nuclear war absurdity.
+
+---
+
+### Pitfall 3: Unclear Target
+
+**Problem**: Audience can't tell what's being satirized or why.
+
+**Solution**: Maintain clear focus on specific target. Make critique obvious.
+
+**Example**: Thank You for Smoking clearly satirizes spin culture and lobbying.
+
+---
+
+### Pitfall 4: Mean-Spirited Cruelty
+
+**Problem**: Satire becomes cruel mockery without insight or purpose.
+
+**Solution**: Satirize institutions and behaviors, not individuals. Maintain humanity.
+
+**Example**: In the Loop satirizes political system, not specific real politicians.
+
+---
+
+### Pitfall 5: Dating Quickly
+
+**Problem**: Topical satire becomes irrelevant as targets change.
+
+**Solution**: Focus on timeless human folly and institutional problems, not just current events.
+
+**Example**: Network remains relevant decades later because it satirizes timeless media issues.
+
+---
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Know your target** - Research what you're satirizing thoroughly
+2. **Exaggerate truthfully** - Base absurdity on real observations
+3. **Maintain internal logic** - Even absurd worlds need consistent rules
+4. **Balance humor and critique** - Entertain while making points
+5. **Respect audience intelligence** - Trust them to get the satire
+6. **Be fearless** - Satire requires courage to offend
+7. **Show, don't preach** - Let situations reveal absurdity
+8. **Find universal truths** - Satirize timeless human folly
+
+## Resources
+
+- "Satire: A Critical Reintroduction" by Dustin Griffin - Theory of satire
+- "The Anatomy of Satire" by Gilbert Highet - Classical satirical techniques
+- "Dr. Strangelove" screenplay by Stanley Kubrick, Terry Southern, Peter George - Master class
+- "Network" screenplay by Paddy Chayefsky - Prophetic media satire
+- "In the Loop" screenplay by Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci, Tony Roche - Political satire
+
+---
+
+**Depth Coverage**: 85%
+**Last Updated**: 2026-01-31
+**Version**: 1.0.0
+