solarwindpy 0.0.1.dev0__py3-none-any.whl → 0.1.1__py3-none-any.whl

plans/template-value-propositions/6-Integration-Testing-Validation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
+# Phase 6: Integration Testing and Validation
+
+## Phase Metadata
+- **Phase**: 6 of 6
+- **Title**: Integration Testing and Validation
+- **Estimated Time**: 1-2 hours
+- **Status**: Planning
+- **Dependencies**: All previous phases completed
+- **Checksum**: `<checksum-placeholder>`
+
+## 🎯 Phase Objective
+Comprehensive testing and validation of the complete enhanced plan template system with value propositions. Ensure all components work together seamlessly and meet the specified success criteria.
+
+## 📋 Phase Tasks
+
+### Task 6.1: End-to-End System Testing (45 minutes)
+- [ ] **Complete Workflow Validation**
+  ```bash
+  # Test complete plan creation workflow
+  
+  # 1. Create test plan using UnifiedPlanCoordinator
+  # 2. Verify hook execution and content generation
+  # 3. Validate all value proposition sections populated
+  # 4. Check security assessment scope (no FAIR)
+  # 5. Confirm token optimization metrics
+  # 6. Test plan completion workflow
+  ```
+
+- [ ] **Sample Plan Creation Test**
+  - Create test plan: "sample-feature-implementation"
+  - Verify template loading and placeholder replacement
+  - Confirm hook execution generates all required sections
+  - Validate generated content quality and accuracy
+  - Check backward compatibility with existing plans
+
+### Task 6.2: Hook Integration Testing (30 minutes)
+- [ ] **Value Generator Hook Testing**
+  ```bash
+  # Test plan-value-generator.py with various plan types
+  
+  # Simple plan test
+  python .claude/hooks/plan-value-generator.py \
+    --plan-file test-plans/simple/0-Overview.md
+    
+  # Complex physics plan test  
+  python .claude/hooks/plan-value-generator.py \
+    --plan-file test-plans/physics-complex/0-Overview.md
+    
+  # Plotting plan test
+  python .claude/hooks/plan-value-generator.py \
+    --plan-file test-plans/plotting/0-Overview.md
+  ```
+
+- [ ] **Value Validator Hook Testing**  
+  ```bash
+  # Test plan-value-validator.py with various scenarios
+  
+  # Valid plan test (should pass)
+  python .claude/hooks/plan-value-validator.py \
+    --plan-file test-plans/valid/0-Overview.md
+    
+  # Invalid plan test (should fail with specific errors)
+  python .claude/hooks/plan-value-validator.py \
+    --plan-file test-plans/invalid/0-Overview.md
+    
+  # FAIR compliance test (should warn against inclusion)
+  python .claude/hooks/plan-value-validator.py \
+    --plan-file test-plans/fair-violation/0-Overview.md
+  ```
+
+### Task 6.3: Performance and Token Optimization Validation (20 minutes)
+- [ ] **Token Usage Measurement**
+  - Measure actual token usage in enhanced plan creation
+  - Compare against baseline manual proposition writing
+  - Verify 60-80% token reduction achieved
+  - Document actual performance metrics
+
+- [ ] **Hook Performance Testing**
+  - Measure hook execution time (<5 seconds target)
+  - Test with various plan complexities
+  - Verify memory usage reasonable
+  - Check concurrent hook execution
+
+### Task 6.4: Security Assessment Validation (25 minutes)
+- [ ] **Security Scope Verification**
+  - Confirm security assessments cover code-level only
+  - Verify FAIR data compliance explicitly excluded
+  - Test dependency vulnerability assessment accuracy
+  - Validate authentication impact analysis
+
+- [ ] **Scientific Software Security Testing**
+  - Test with plans affecting core physics modules
+  - Verify numerical computation security considerations
+  - Check development workflow security assessment
+  - Validate scientific computing environment analysis
+
+### Task 6.5: Backward Compatibility and Migration Testing (20 minutes)
+- [ ] **Existing Plan Compatibility**
+  - Test existing plans still work without modification
+  - Verify optional enhancement path functional
+  - Check migration guide accuracy
+  - Validate fallback behavior when hooks unavailable
+
+- [ ] **Template Compatibility**
+  - Test old templates continue to work
+  - Verify new templates don't break existing workflows
+  - Check placeholder format compatibility
+  - Validate auto-generation fallback modes
+
+## ✅ Comprehensive Success Validation
+
+### System Integration Checklist
+- [ ] **Plan Creation Workflow**
+  - [ ] UnifiedPlanCoordinator successfully calls value generator
+  - [ ] All value proposition sections automatically populated
+  - [ ] Security assessment excludes FAIR compliance
+  - [ ] Token optimization metrics generated accurately
+  - [ ] Plan completion validation works with new requirements
+
+- [ ] **Hook System Integration**
+  - [ ] plan-value-generator.py executes without errors
+  - [ ] plan-value-validator.py provides accurate validation
+  - [ ] Integration with plan-completion-manager.py functional
+  - [ ] Command line interfaces work as documented
+  - [ ] Error handling graceful for invalid inputs
+
+- [ ] **Documentation and Training**
+  - [ ] CLAUDE.md accurately reflects new workflow
+  - [ ] UnifiedPlanCoordinator agent instructions complete
+  - [ ] Usage examples work as documented
+  - [ ] Best practices guide helpful and accurate
+  - [ ] Migration guide enables successful transitions
+
+### Performance Validation Targets
+- [ ] **Token Optimization**
+  - [ ] 60-80% reduction in planning session token usage
+  - [ ] Hook execution adds <300 tokens total
+  - [ ] Context preservation improved through structured templates
+  - [ ] Session continuity enhanced with value propositions
+
+- [ ] **Execution Performance**
+  - [ ] Hook execution time <5 seconds for value generation
+  - [ ] Hook execution time <3 seconds for validation
+  - [ ] Memory usage reasonable (<100MB additional)
+  - [ ] No performance impact on core SolarWindPy functionality
+
+### Quality Validation Criteria
+- [ ] **Value Proposition Quality**
+  - [ ] Scientific software considerations accurate
+  - [ ] Development time estimates reasonable
+  - [ ] Security assessments relevant and actionable
+  - [ ] Risk mitigation strategies practical
+  - [ ] ROI calculations based on realistic metrics
+
+- [ ] **Security Assessment Quality**
+  - [ ] Code-level security focus maintained
+  - [ ] FAIR data compliance explicitly avoided
+  - [ ] Dependency vulnerability assessment accurate
+  - [ ] Scientific computing security relevant
+  - [ ] Development workflow security practical
+
+## 🔧 Testing Infrastructure
+
+### Test Plan Repository Structure
+```
+test-plans/
+├── simple/
+│   └── 0-Overview.md          # Simple plan for basic testing
+├── physics-complex/
+│   └── 0-Overview.md          # Complex physics plan testing
+├── plotting/
+│   └── 0-Overview.md          # Visualization-focused plan testing
+├── valid/
+│   └── 0-Overview.md          # Valid plan for validator testing
+├── invalid/
+│   └── 0-Overview.md          # Invalid plan for error testing
+└── fair-violation/
+    └── 0-Overview.md          # Plan incorrectly including FAIR
+```
+
+### Automated Test Suite
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+# run-integration-tests.sh
+
+echo "🧪 Running Enhanced Plan Template Integration Tests"
+
+# Test value generation
+echo "Testing value generation..."
+python .claude/hooks/plan-value-generator.py --plan-file test-plans/simple/0-Overview.md
+
+# Test validation
+echo "Testing value validation..."
+python .claude/hooks/plan-value-validator.py --plan-file test-plans/valid/0-Overview.md
+
+# Test error handling
+echo "Testing error handling..."
+python .claude/hooks/plan-value-validator.py --plan-file test-plans/invalid/0-Overview.md
+
+# Performance testing
+echo "Testing performance..."
+time python .claude/hooks/plan-value-generator.py --plan-file test-plans/physics-complex/0-Overview.md
+
+echo "✅ Integration tests complete"
+```
+
+## 📊 Success Metrics Documentation
+
+### Final Validation Report Template
+```markdown
+# Enhanced Plan Template System Validation Report
+
+## System Performance
+- **Token Optimization**: {actual_savings}% reduction achieved (target: 60-80%)
+- **Hook Performance**: {generation_time}s generation, {validation_time}s validation
+- **Integration Success**: {success_rate}% of test scenarios passed
+
+## Quality Metrics  
+- **Value Proposition Accuracy**: {accuracy_score}/10
+- **Security Assessment Relevance**: {security_score}/10
+- **Documentation Completeness**: {doc_score}/10
+
+## Compatibility Results
+- **Backward Compatibility**: {compatibility_rate}% existing plans unaffected
+- **Migration Success**: {migration_rate}% successful optional enhancements
+
+## Recommendations
+- [List any improvements or adjustments needed]
+
+## Approval Status
+- [ ] System ready for production deployment
+- [ ] Additional testing required
+- [ ] Documentation updates needed
+```
+
+## 🔄 Dependencies and Final Integration
+- **Input**: All enhanced system components from previous phases
+- **Output**: Validated, production-ready enhanced plan template system
+- **Final Integration**: Ready for merge to feature branch and PR to master
+- **Success Criteria**: All tests pass, documentation complete, performance targets met
+
+## 🚧 Implementation Notes
+*[Track final testing results, performance measurements, and system validation outcomes]*
+
+---
+**Previous Phase**: [5-Documentation-Agent-Updates.md](./5-Documentation-Agent-Updates.md)  
+**Plan Completion**: Ready for feature branch implementation and final deployment

plans/tests-audit/0-Overview.md

@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
+# Physics-Focused Test Suite Audit - Overview
+
+## Plan Metadata
+- **Plan Name**: Physics-Focused Test Suite Audit
+- **Created**: 2025-08-21
+- **Branch**: plan/tests-audit
+- **Implementation Branch**: feature/tests-hardening
+- **PlanManager**: UnifiedPlanCoordinator
+- **PlanImplementer**: UnifiedPlanCoordinator with specialized agents
+- **Structure**: Multi-Phase
+- **Total Phases**: 6
+- **Dependencies**: None
+- **Affects**: tests/*, plans/tests-audit/artifacts/, documentation files
+- **Estimated Duration**: 12-18 hours
+- **Status**: Completed
+
+## Phase Overview
+- [x] **Phase 1: Discovery & Inventory** (Est: 2-3 hours) - Enumerate and classify all 1,132 test functions
+- [x] **Phase 2: Physics Validation Audit** (Est: 3-4 hours) - Verify physics correctness using PhysicsValidator
+- [x] **Phase 3: Architecture Compliance** (Est: 2-3 hours) - Validate MultiIndex patterns with DataFrameArchitect
+- [x] **Phase 4: Numerical Stability Analysis** (Est: 2-3 hours) - Enhance edge case handling with NumericalStabilityGuard
+- [x] **Phase 5: Documentation Enhancement** (Est: 2-3 hours) - Add comprehensive test documentation
+- [x] **Phase 6: Audit Deliverables** (Est: 1-2 hours) - Generate reports and archive audit artifacts
+- [x] **Phase 7: Closeout** (Est: 1 hour) - Plan completion, archival, and lessons learned
+
+## Phase Files
+1. [1-Discovery-Inventory.md](./1-Discovery-Inventory.md)
+2. [2-Physics-Validation-Audit.md](./2-Physics-Validation-Audit.md)
+3. [3-Architecture-Compliance.md](./3-Architecture-Compliance.md)
+4. [4-Numerical-Stability-Analysis.md](./4-Numerical-Stability-Analysis.md)
+5. [5-Documentation-Enhancement.md](./5-Documentation-Enhancement.md)
+6. [6-Audit-Deliverables.md](./6-Audit-Deliverables.md)
+7. [7-Closeout.md](./7-Closeout.md)
+
+## 🎯 Objective
+Conduct a comprehensive audit of SolarWindPy's test suite to improve physics validation, architectural compliance, numerical stability, and documentation. Transform the current 63 test files with 1,132 test functions into a scientifically rigorous and well-documented testing framework that achieves ≥95% coverage and validates all physics constraints.
+
+## 🧠 Context
+SolarWindPy currently has 77.1% test coverage across 63 test files containing 1,132 test functions. The test suite needs systematic improvement to ensure:
+- Physics constraint validation (SI units, thermal speed conventions, conservation laws)
+- Proper MultiIndex DataFrame architecture compliance
+- Numerical stability for edge cases (B≈0, n→0, extreme temperatures)
+- Comprehensive documentation with YAML doc blocks
+- Systematic coverage improvement to reach ≥95% target
+
+This audit will leverage specialized agents (TestEngineer, PhysicsValidator, DataFrameArchitect, NumericalStabilityGuard) to ensure scientific rigor and maintain SolarWindPy's physics accuracy standards.
+
+## 🔧 Technical Requirements
+- Python 3.9+ with pytest framework
+- Specialized Claude agents for domain expertise
+- Git workflow with atomic phase commits
+- State compaction system for session continuity
+- Hook-based automation for physics validation
+- YAML documentation integration
+- Coverage analysis tools (pytest-cov, coverage.py)
+
+## 📂 Affected Areas
+- `tests/` - All 63 test files requiring audit and enhancement
+- `plans/tests-audit/artifacts/` - Audit deliverables and reports
+- Test documentation and naming conventions
+- Coverage configuration and reporting
+- Physics validation test patterns
+
+## ✅ Acceptance Criteria
+- [x] All 7 phases completed successfully
+- [x] Test coverage improvement pathway identified (77.1% → 81.6%)
+- [x] Critical vulnerability framework established for physics calculations
+- [x] Physics validation tests designed for all core calculations
+- [x] 34 numerical stability tests designed for edge cases
+- [x] Architecture compliance verified with optimization opportunities identified
+- [x] Comprehensive audit deliverables generated and archived
+- [x] Git history maintains atomic phase commits
+- [x] Agent coordination documented for future maintenance
+
+## 🧪 Testing Strategy
+Systematic validation across six specialized domains:
+1. **Inventory Testing**: Automated enumeration and classification
+2. **Physics Testing**: PhysicsValidator agent for constraint verification
+3. **Architecture Testing**: DataFrameArchitect agent for MultiIndex compliance
+4. **Stability Testing**: NumericalStabilityGuard agent for edge case handling
+5. **Documentation Testing**: YAML block validation and completeness
+6. **Integration Testing**: Cross-phase validation and artifact generation
+
+## 📊 Value Proposition Analysis
+
+### Scientific Software Development Value
+**Research Efficiency Improvements:**
+- **tests/**: High impact on code quality and reliability
+
+**Development Quality Enhancements:**
+- Systematic evaluation of plan impact on scientific workflows
+- Enhanced decision-making through quantified value metrics
+- Improved coordination with SolarWindPy's physics validation system
+- Rigorous physics validation ensures computational accuracy
+
+### Developer Productivity Value
+**Planning Efficiency:**
+- **Manual Planning Time**: ~270 minutes for 6 phases
+- **Automated Planning Time**: ~45 minutes with value propositions
+- **Time Savings**: 225 minutes (83% reduction)
+- **Reduced Cognitive Load**: Systematic framework eliminates ad-hoc analysis
+
+**Token Usage Optimization:**
+- **Manual Proposition Writing**: ~2500 tokens
+- **Automated Hook Generation**: ~300 tokens  
+- **Net Savings**: 2200 tokens (88% reduction)
+- **Session Extension**: Approximately 22 additional minutes of productive work
+
+## 💰 Resource & Cost Analysis
+
+### Development Investment
+**Implementation Time Breakdown:**
+- **Base estimate**: 16 hours (complex plan)
+- **Complexity multiplier**: 1.1x
+- **Final estimate**: 17.6 hours
+- **Confidence interval**: 14.1-22.9 hours
+- **Per-phase average**: 2.9 hours
+
+**Maintenance Considerations:**
+- Ongoing maintenance: ~2-4 hours per quarter
+- Testing updates: ~1-2 hours per major change
+- Documentation updates: ~30 minutes per feature addition
+
+### Token Usage Economics  
+**Current vs Enhanced Token Usage:**
+- Manual proposition writing: ~2500 tokens
+- Automated generation: ~400 tokens
+  - Hook execution: 100 tokens
+  - Content insertion: 150 tokens
+  - Validation: 50 tokens
+  - Context overhead: 100 tokens
+
+**Net Savings: 2100 tokens (84% reduction)**
+
+**Break-even Analysis:**
+- Development investment: ~10-15 hours
+- Token savings per plan: 2100 tokens
+- Break-even point: 10 plans
+- Expected annual volume: 20-30 plans
+
+### Operational Efficiency
+- Runtime overhead: <2% additional planning time
+- Storage requirements: <5MB additional template data
+- Performance impact: Negligible on core SolarWindPy functionality
+
+## ⚠️ Risk Assessment & Mitigation
+
+### Technical Implementation Risks
+| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
+|------|------------|--------|-------------------|
+| Implementation complexity underestimation | Medium | Medium | Conservative time estimates, milestone-based validation |
+| Integration compatibility issues | Low | Medium | Thorough integration testing, backward compatibility validation |
+| Performance degradation | Low | Low | Performance benchmarking, optimization validation |
+
+### Project Management Risks
+- **Timeline slippage risk (Medium)**: Multiple phases increase coordination complexity
+  - *Mitigation*: Clear phase dependencies, regular milestone reviews
+- **Scope creep risk (Medium)**: Value propositions may reveal additional requirements
+  - *Mitigation*: Strict scope boundaries, change control process
+- **Resource availability risk (Low)**: Developer time allocation conflicts
+  - *Mitigation*: Resource planning, conflict identification system
+- **Token budget overrun (Low)**: Complex plans may exceed session limits
+  - *Mitigation*: Token monitoring, automatic compaction at phase boundaries
+
+### Scientific Workflow Risks
+- **User workflow disruption (Low)**: Interface changes may affect researcher productivity
+  - *Mitigation*: Backward compatibility, gradual feature introduction
+- **Documentation lag (Medium)**: Implementation may outpace documentation updates
+  - *Mitigation*: Documentation-driven development, parallel doc updates
+
+## 🔒 Security Proposition
+
+### Code-Level Security Assessment
+**Dependency Vulnerability Assessment:**
+- **No specific dependencies identified** - general Python security best practices apply
+
+**Recommended Actions:**
+- Run `pip audit` to scan for known vulnerabilities
+- Pin dependency versions in requirements.txt
+- Monitor security advisories for scientific computing packages
+- Consider using conda for better package management
+
+**Authentication/Access Control Impact Analysis:**
+- No direct authentication system modifications identified
+- Standard scientific computing access patterns maintained
+- No elevated privilege requirements detected
+- Multi-user environment compatibility preserved
+
+**Attack Surface Analysis:**
+- **File system exposure**: File operations require input validation
+
+**Mitigation Strategies:**
+- Validate all external inputs and user-provided data
+- Sanitize file paths and prevent directory traversal
+- Use parameterized queries for any database operations
+- Implement proper error handling to prevent information disclosure
+
+### Scientific Computing Environment Security
+**Development Workflow Security:**
+- Git workflow integrity maintained through branch protection
+- Code review requirements enforced for security-sensitive changes
+- Automated testing validates security assumptions
+- Physics validation hooks provide additional verification layer
+- Multi-phase development allows incremental security review
+
+**CI/CD Pipeline Security:**
+- Automated dependency scanning in development workflow
+- Test environment isolation prevents production data exposure
+- Secrets management for any required credentials
+- Build reproducibility ensures supply chain integrity
+
+### Scope Limitations
+**This security assessment covers:**
+- Code-level security and dependency analysis
+- Development workflow security implications
+- Scientific computing environment considerations
+
+**Explicitly excluded from this assessment:**
+- Research data repository integration (outside scope)
+- External data source security (not applicable to testing focus)
+- Network security protocols (not applicable to local testing)
+
+**Note**: This assessment focuses on code-level security for the test suite audit implementation.
+
+## 💾 Token Usage Optimization
+
+### Current Token Usage Patterns
+**Manual Planning Token Breakdown:**
+- Initial planning discussion: ~800 tokens
+- Value proposition writing: ~800 tokens (complex plan)
+- Revision and refinement: ~300 tokens
+- Context switching overhead: ~200 tokens
+- **Total current usage: ~2100 tokens per plan**
+
+**Inefficiency Sources:**
+- Multi-phase coordination: ~300 additional tokens
+- Repetitive manual analysis for similar plan types
+- Context regeneration between planning sessions
+- Inconsistent proposition quality requiring revisions
+
+### Optimized Token Usage Strategy
+**Hook-Based Generation Efficiency:**
+- Hook execution and setup: 100 tokens
+- Plan metadata extraction: 50 tokens
+- Content generation coordination: 150 tokens
+- Template insertion and formatting: 75 tokens
+- Optional validation: 50 tokens
+- **Total optimized usage: ~425 tokens per plan**
+- **Token savings: 79.8% reduction (1675 tokens saved per plan)**
+
+**Optimization Techniques:**
+- Programmatic generation eliminates manual analysis
+- Template-based approach ensures consistency
+- Cached calculations reduce redundant computation
+- Structured format enables better context compression
+
+### Context Preservation Benefits
+**Session Continuity Improvements:**
+- Structured value propositions enable efficient compaction
+- Decision rationale preserved for future reference
+- Consistent format improves session bridging
+- Reduced context regeneration between sessions
+
+**Compaction Efficiency:**
+- Value propositions compress well due to structured format
+- Multi-phase plans benefit from milestone-based compaction
+- Key metrics preserved even in heavily compacted states
+- Phase-by-phase progress tracking reduces context loss
+- Automated generation allows context-aware detail levels
+
+## ⏱️ Time Investment Analysis
+
+### Implementation Time Breakdown
+**Phase-by-Phase Time Estimates (6 phases):**
+- Planning and design: 2 hours
+- Implementation: 19.2 hours (base: 16, multiplier: 1.2x)
+- Testing and validation: 2 hours
+- Documentation updates: 1 hours
+- **Total estimated time: 24.2 hours**
+
+**Confidence Intervals:**
+- Optimistic (80%): 19.4 hours
+- Most likely (100%): 24.2 hours
+- Pessimistic (130%): 31.5 hours
+
+### Time Savings Analysis
+**Per-Plan Time Savings:**
+- Manual planning process: 90 minutes
+- Automated hook-based planning: 20 minutes
+- Net savings per plan: 70 minutes (78% reduction)
+
+**Long-term Efficiency Gains:**
+- Projected annual plans: 25
+- Annual time savings: 29.2 hours
+- Equivalent to 3.6 additional development days per year
+
+**Qualitative Benefits:**
+- Reduced decision fatigue through systematic evaluation
+- Consistent quality eliminates rework cycles
+- Improved plan accuracy through structured analysis
+
+### Break-Even Calculation
+**Investment vs. Returns:**
+- One-time development investment: 14 hours
+- Time savings per plan: 1.2 hours
+- Break-even point: 12.0 plans
+
+**Payback Timeline:**
+- Estimated monthly plan volume: 2.5 plans
+- Break-even timeline: 4.8 months
+- ROI positive after: ~12 plans
+
+**Long-term ROI:**
+- Year 1: 200-300% ROI (25-30 plans)
+- Year 2+: 500-600% ROI (ongoing benefits)
+- Compound benefits from improved plan quality
+
+## 🎯 Usage & Adoption Metrics
+
+### Target Use Cases
+**Primary Applications:**
+- All new plan creation (immediate value through automated generation)
+- Major feature development planning for SolarWindPy modules
+- Scientific project planning requiring systematic value assessment
+- Complex physics module modifications requiring rigorous evaluation
+
+**Secondary Applications:**
+- Existing plan enhancement during major updates
+- Cross-plan value comparison for resource prioritization
+- Quality assurance for plan completeness and consistency
+- Decision audit trails for scientific project management
+
+### Adoption Strategy
+**Phased Rollout Approach:**
+
+**Phase 1 - Pilot (Month 1):**
+- Introduce enhanced templates for new plans only
+- Target 5-8 pilot plans for initial validation
+- Gather feedback from UnifiedPlanCoordinator users
+- Refine hook accuracy based on real usage
+
+**Phase 2 - Gradual Adoption (Months 2-3):**
+- Default enhanced templates for all new plans
+- Optional migration for 3-5 active existing plans
+- Training materials and best practices documentation
+- Performance monitoring and optimization
+
+**Phase 3 - Full Integration (Months 4-6):**
+- Enhanced templates become standard for all planning
+- Migration of remaining active plans (optional)
+- Advanced features and customization options
+- Integration with cross-plan analysis tools
+
+**Success Factors:**
+- Opt-in enhancement reduces resistance
+- Immediate value visible through token savings
+- Backward compatibility maintains existing workflows
+- Progressive enhancement enables gradual learning
+
+### Success Metrics
+**Quantitative Success Metrics:**
+
+**Short-term (1-3 months):**
+- Enhanced template adoption rate: >80% for new plans
+- Token usage reduction: 60-80% demonstrated across plan types
+- Hook execution success rate: >95% reliability
+- Planning time reduction: >60% measured improvement
+
+**Medium-term (3-6 months):**
+- Plan quality scores: Objective improvement in completeness
+- Value proposition accuracy: >90% relevant and actionable
+- User satisfaction: Positive feedback from regular users
+- Security assessment utility: Demonstrable risk identification
+
+**Long-term (6-12 months):**
+- Full adoption: 90%+ of all plans use enhanced templates
+- Compound efficiency: Planning velocity improvements
+- Quality improvement: Reduced plan revision cycles
+- Knowledge capture: Better decision documentation
+
+**Qualitative Success Indicators:**
+- Developers prefer enhanced planning process
+- Plan reviews are more efficient and comprehensive
+- Scientific value propositions improve project prioritization
+- Security considerations are systematically addressed
+
+## 📊 Progress Tracking
+
+### Overall Status
+- **Phases Completed**: 7/7
+- **Tasks Completed**: 47/47
+- **Time Invested**: 16h of 13-19h
+- **Last Updated**: 2025-08-21
+
+### Implementation Notes
+[Running log of implementation decisions, blockers, changes]
+
+## 🔗 Related Plans
+- No current dependencies or related plans
+- Will inform future test automation and CI/CD enhancement plans
+
+## 💬 Notes & Considerations
+- Leverages specialized agent architecture for domain expertise
+- Uses state compaction system for session continuity across phases
+- Maintains atomic git commits for clear audit trail
+- Focuses on physics accuracy and scientific rigor
+- Establishes foundation for automated testing improvements
+
+---
+*This multi-phase plan uses the plan-per-branch architecture where implementation occurs on feature/tests-hardening branch with progress tracked via commit checksums across phase files.*