solarwindpy 0.0.1.dev0__py3-none-any.whl → 0.1.1__py3-none-any.whl

plans/template-value-propositions/4-Value-Validator-Hook-Implementation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,274 @@
+# Phase 4: Value Validator Hook Implementation
+
+## Phase Metadata
+- **Phase**: 4 of 6
+- **Title**: Value Validator Hook Implementation
+- **Estimated Time**: 2-3 hours
+- **Status**: Planning
+- **Dependencies**: Phase 1, 2, 3 completed
+- **Checksum**: `<checksum-placeholder>`
+
+## 🎯 Phase Objective
+Implement `.claude/hooks/plan-value-validator.py` - an optional validation hook that ensures all value proposition sections are present, complete, and accurate. Integrates with the plan completion workflow.
+
+## 📋 Phase Tasks
+
+### Task 4.1: Validation Framework Implementation (60 minutes)
+- [ ] **Create Validator Hook Structure**
+  ```python
+  #!/usr/bin/env python3
+  """
+  SolarWindPy Plan Value Proposition Validator
+  Validates completeness and accuracy of plan value propositions
+  """
+  
+  import argparse
+  import re
+  from pathlib import Path
+  from typing import Dict, List, Tuple, Optional
+  ```
+
+- [ ] **Command Line Interface**
+  - `--plan-file`: Path to plan overview file to validate
+  - `--strict`: Enable strict validation mode
+  - `--report-format`: text (default), json, or markdown
+  - `--fix-issues`: Attempt to fix minor validation issues
+
+### Task 4.2: Value Proposition Section Validation (75 minutes)
+
+#### Required Section Checker
+- [ ] **Section Presence Validation**
+  ```python
+  def validate_required_sections(plan_content: str) -> Dict[str, bool]:
+      """Check if all required value proposition sections are present."""
+      
+      required_sections = {
+          'value_proposition_analysis': r'## 📊 Value Proposition Analysis',
+          'resource_cost_analysis': r'## 💰 Resource & Cost Analysis', 
+          'risk_assessment': r'## ⚠️ Risk Assessment & Mitigation',
+          'security_proposition': r'## 🔒 Security Proposition',
+          'token_optimization': r'## 💾 Token Usage Optimization',
+          'time_analysis': r'## ⏱️ Time Investment Analysis',
+          'usage_metrics': r'## 🎯 Usage & Adoption Metrics'
+      }
+      
+      validation_results = {}
+      
+      for section_key, pattern in required_sections.items():
+          validation_results[section_key] = bool(re.search(pattern, plan_content, re.IGNORECASE))
+      
+      return validation_results
+  ```
+
+#### Content Quality Validation
+- [ ] **Security Section Validation**
+  ```python
+  def validate_security_section(plan_content: str) -> Tuple[bool, List[str]]:
+      """Validate security proposition completeness and scope."""
+      
+      issues = []
+      security_section = extract_section(plan_content, 'Security Proposition')
+      
+      if not security_section:
+          return False, ['Security section missing entirely']
+      
+      # Check for required security components (code-level only)
+      required_components = {
+          'dependency': ['dependency', 'package', 'vulnerability'],
+          'authentication': ['auth', 'access', 'control', 'permission'], 
+          'attack_surface': ['exposure', 'interface', 'attack', 'surface'],
+          'development_security': ['workflow', 'ci/cd', 'development']
+      }
+      
+      for component, keywords in required_components.items():
+          if not any(keyword in security_section.lower() for keyword in keywords):
+              issues.append(f'Missing {component} assessment in security section')
+      
+      # Check for excluded FAIR data compliance
+      fair_keywords = ['fair', 'metadata', 'persistent identifier', 'ontology']
+      if any(keyword in security_section.lower() for keyword in fair_keywords):
+          issues.append('Security section includes FAIR data compliance (should be excluded)')
+      
+      return len(issues) == 0, issues
+  ```
+
+### Task 4.3: Token Optimization Validation (45 minutes)
+- [ ] **Token Calculation Verification**
+  ```python
+  def validate_token_calculations(plan_content: str) -> Tuple[bool, List[str]]:
+      """Verify token usage calculations are reasonable and present."""
+      
+      issues = []
+      token_section = extract_section(plan_content, 'Token Usage Optimization')
+      
+      if not token_section:
+          issues.append('Token optimization section missing')
+          return False, issues
+      
+      # Extract token numbers from section
+      token_numbers = re.findall(r'(\d{1,5})\s*tokens?', token_section)
+      
+      if not token_numbers:
+          issues.append('No token usage numbers found in token section')
+      
+      # Validate reasonable ranges
+      for token_str in token_numbers:
+          tokens = int(token_str)
+          if tokens < 50:
+              issues.append(f'Token estimate {tokens} seems too low')
+          elif tokens > 10000:
+              issues.append(f'Token estimate {tokens} seems too high for single plan')
+      
+      # Check for savings calculation
+      savings_pattern = r'(\d{1,3})%\s*(?:reduction|savings?)'
+      savings_match = re.search(savings_pattern, token_section, re.IGNORECASE)
+      
+      if savings_match:
+          savings_percent = int(savings_match.group(1))
+          if savings_percent < 30 or savings_percent > 90:
+              issues.append(f'Token savings {savings_percent}% outside reasonable range (30-90%)')
+      else:
+          issues.append('No token savings percentage found')
+      
+      return len(issues) == 0, issues
+  ```
+
+### Task 4.4: Integration with Plan Completion (30 minutes)
+- [ ] **Plan Completion Manager Integration**
+  ```python
+  def integrate_with_completion_manager():
+      """Integration hook for plan-completion-manager.py"""
+      
+      # This function will be called by plan-completion-manager.py
+      # when checking if a plan can be marked as completed
+      
+      def validate_plan_for_completion(plan_dir: Path) -> Tuple[bool, str]:
+          """Validate plan has complete value propositions before completion."""
+          
+          overview_file = plan_dir / '0-Overview.md'
+          
+          if not overview_file.exists():
+              return False, 'No overview file found'
+          
+          with open(overview_file, 'r') as f:
+              content = f.read()
+          
+          # Run all validations
+          section_results = validate_required_sections(content)
+          security_valid, security_issues = validate_security_section(content)
+          token_valid, token_issues = validate_token_calculations(content)
+          
+          # Collect all issues
+          all_issues = []
+          
+          missing_sections = [k for k, v in section_results.items() if not v]
+          if missing_sections:
+              all_issues.extend([f'Missing section: {s}' for s in missing_sections])
+          
+          if not security_valid:
+              all_issues.extend(security_issues)
+          
+          if not token_valid:
+              all_issues.extend(token_issues)
+          
+          if all_issues:
+              return False, f"Value proposition validation failed: {'; '.join(all_issues)}"
+          
+          return True, "All value propositions validated successfully"
+      
+      return validate_plan_for_completion
+  ```
+
+### Task 4.5: Reporting and Fix Suggestions (30 minutes)
+- [ ] **Validation Report Generator**
+  ```python
+  def generate_validation_report(validation_results: Dict) -> str:
+      """Generate comprehensive validation report."""
+      
+      report_lines = []
+      report_lines.append("# Plan Value Proposition Validation Report")
+      report_lines.append(f"Generated: {datetime.now().isoformat()}")
+      report_lines.append("")
+      
+      # Overall status
+      all_passed = all(result.get('passed', False) for result in validation_results.values())
+      status = "✅ PASSED" if all_passed else "❌ FAILED"
+      report_lines.append(f"**Overall Status**: {status}")
+      report_lines.append("")
+      
+      # Section-by-section results
+      for section, results in validation_results.items():
+          section_status = "✅" if results.get('passed', False) else "❌"
+          report_lines.append(f"## {section_status} {section.replace('_', ' ').title()}")
+          
+          if results.get('issues'):
+              report_lines.append("**Issues found:**")
+              for issue in results['issues']:
+                  report_lines.append(f"- {issue}")
+          else:
+              report_lines.append("No issues found.")
+          
+          report_lines.append("")
+      
+      return "\n".join(report_lines)
+  ```
+
+- [ ] **Auto-Fix Suggestions**
+  ```python
+  def suggest_fixes(validation_issues: List[str]) -> List[str]:
+      """Suggest fixes for common validation issues."""
+      
+      fixes = []
+      
+      for issue in validation_issues:
+          if 'Missing section' in issue:
+              fixes.append(f"Add the {issue.split(':')[1].strip()} section to your plan")
+          elif 'FAIR data compliance' in issue:
+              fixes.append("Remove FAIR data references from security section (not implemented)")
+          elif 'Token estimate' in issue and 'too low' in issue:
+              fixes.append("Increase token estimates - typical plans use 500-3000 tokens")
+          elif 'Token estimate' in issue and 'too high' in issue:
+              fixes.append("Reduce token estimates - values above 10k tokens are unusual")
+          elif 'No token savings' in issue:
+              fixes.append("Add token savings percentage (typically 60-80% with hooks)")
+          else:
+              fixes.append(f"Review and address: {issue}")
+      
+      return fixes
+  ```
+
+## ✅ Phase Success Criteria
+- [ ] Complete `plan-value-validator.py` hook implemented
+- [ ] All required sections validated
+- [ ] Security section validation (no FAIR compliance)
+- [ ] Token calculation verification
+- [ ] Integration with plan-completion-manager.py
+- [ ] Validation reporting and fix suggestions
+- [ ] Command line interface functional
+- [ ] Performance acceptable (<3 seconds execution)
+
+## 🔧 Testing Approach
+- [ ] **Unit Tests**
+  - Section presence detection
+  - Security content validation  
+  - Token calculation verification
+  - Report generation
+  
+- [ ] **Integration Tests**
+  - Plan completion workflow integration
+  - Valid plan acceptance
+  - Invalid plan rejection
+  - Fix suggestion accuracy
+
+## 🔄 Dependencies and Integration Points
+- **Input**: Plans with value propositions from Phase 3
+- **Output**: Validation reports and completion approval
+- **Integration**: Works with plan-completion-manager.py
+- **Performance**: Target <3 seconds validation time
+
+## 🚧 Implementation Notes
+*[Track validation logic, integration challenges, and testing results]*
+
+---
+**Previous Phase**: [3-Value-Generator-Hook-Implementation.md](./3-Value-Generator-Hook-Implementation.md)  
+**Next Phase**: [5-Documentation-Agent-Updates.md](./5-Documentation-Agent-Updates.md)

plans/template-value-propositions/5-Documentation-Agent-Updates.md

@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+# Phase 5: Documentation and Agent Updates
+
+## Phase Metadata
+- **Phase**: 5 of 6
+- **Title**: Documentation and Agent Updates
+- **Estimated Time**: 2-3 hours
+- **Status**: Planning
+- **Dependencies**: Phase 1, 2, 3, 4 completed
+- **Checksum**: `<checksum-placeholder>`
+
+## 🎯 Phase Objective
+Update all documentation and agent configurations to support the new value proposition system. Ensure UnifiedPlanCoordinator can create plans with automated value generation and that developers understand the new workflow.
+
+## 📋 Phase Tasks
+
+### Task 5.1: Update CLAUDE.md Documentation (75 minutes)
+- [ ] **Add Value Proposition Section**
+  ```markdown
+  ## Plan Value Propositions
+  
+  All plans MUST include comprehensive value propositions automatically generated by hooks:
+  
+  ### Required Sections (Auto-Generated)
+  - 📊 **Value Proposition Analysis**: Scientific software development and productivity value
+  - 💰 **Resource & Cost Analysis**: Development investment and ROI calculations  
+  - ⚠️ **Risk Assessment & Mitigation**: Technical, project, and workflow risks
+  - 🔒 **Security Proposition**: Code-level security assessment (NO FAIR compliance)
+  - 💾 **Token Usage Optimization**: Claude session efficiency metrics
+  - ⏱️ **Time Investment Analysis**: Development time and savings breakdown
+  - 🎯 **Usage & Adoption Metrics**: Use cases and success criteria
+  
+  ### Value Generation Workflow
+  1. UnifiedPlanCoordinator creates basic plan structure
+  2. Calls `.claude/hooks/plan-value-generator.py` for automated propositions
+  3. Inserts generated content into template placeholders
+  4. Optional validation via `.claude/hooks/plan-value-validator.py`
+  5. Plan ready with comprehensive value assessment
+  ```
+
+- [ ] **Update Plan Creation Requirements**
+  ```markdown
+  ### Plan Creation Standards
+  - **Value Propositions**: Required for all new plans (auto-generated)
+  - **Security Assessment**: Code-level only, NO FAIR data compliance
+  - **Token Optimization**: Must demonstrate 60-80% savings through hooks
+  - **Backward Compatibility**: Existing plans work unchanged
+  - **Migration Path**: Optional enhancement for active plans
+  ```
+
+- [ ] **Document Hook Usage**
+  ```markdown
+  ## Value Proposition Hooks
+  
+  ### Generation Hook
+  ```bash
+  # Called by UnifiedPlanCoordinator during plan creation
+  python .claude/hooks/plan-value-generator.py \
+    --plan-file plans/new-plan/0-Overview.md \
+    --exclude-fair  # Default: no FAIR compliance
+  ```
+  
+  ### Validation Hook (Optional)
+  ```bash
+  # Called before plan completion
+  python .claude/hooks/plan-value-validator.py \
+    --plan-file plans/completed-plan/0-Overview.md \
+    --report-format text
+  ```
+  ```
+
+### Task 5.2: Update UnifiedPlanCoordinator Agent (60 minutes)
+- [ ] **Enhance Agent Instructions in `.claude/agents/agent-unified-plan-coordinator.md`**
+  ```markdown
+  ## Plan Creation Workflow (Enhanced with Value Propositions)
+  
+  When creating new plans:
+  
+  1. **Initialize Plan Structure**
+     - Create plan branch: `git checkout -b plan/<name>`
+     - Copy template: `cp plans/0-overview-template.md plans/<name>/0-Overview.md`
+     - Gather plan metadata (name, phases, estimated duration, affects)
+  
+  2. **Generate Value Propositions** 
+     ```bash
+     # Call value generation hook
+     python .claude/hooks/plan-value-generator.py \
+       --plan-file plans/<name>/0-Overview.md \
+       --exclude-fair
+     ```
+  
+  3. **Insert Generated Content**
+     - Replace placeholder sections with generated value propositions
+     - Verify all required sections populated
+     - Ensure security assessment excludes FAIR compliance
+  
+  4. **Optional Validation**
+     ```bash
+     # Validate plan completeness
+     python .claude/hooks/plan-value-validator.py \
+       --plan-file plans/<name>/0-Overview.md
+     ```
+  
+  5. **Finalize Plan**
+     - Save completed plan with all value propositions
+     - Create phase files with value considerations
+     - Document token savings achieved
+  ```
+
+- [ ] **Update Agent Capabilities**
+  ```markdown
+  ### Enhanced Value Proposition Capabilities
+  
+  - **Automated Generation**: Call hooks to generate value propositions programmatically
+  - **Token Optimization**: Achieve 60-80% token reduction through hook-based content
+  - **Security Assessment**: Code-level security only, exclude FAIR data standards
+  - **Scientific Focus**: Tailor propositions for plasma physics research software
+  - **Quality Assurance**: Optional validation ensures plan completeness
+  
+  ### Integration with Domain Specialists
+  - **PhysicsValidator**: For security assessments involving physics calculations
+  - **DataFrameArchitect**: For plans affecting pandas operations (token estimates)
+  - **NumericalStabilityGuard**: For numerical computation security assessment
+  - **TestEngineer**: For test coverage impact in value propositions
+  ```
+
+### Task 5.3: Create Usage Examples and Best Practices (45 minutes)
+- [ ] **Example Plan Creation Session**
+  ```markdown
+  ## Example: Creating Enhanced Plan
+  
+  User: "Create a plan for implementing dark mode in plotting"
+  
+  UnifiedPlanCoordinator Process:
+  1. Create plan branch and basic structure
+  2. Extract metadata:
+     - Name: "plotting-dark-mode-implementation"
+     - Affects: "solarwindpy/plotting"
+     - Complexity: "moderate" 
+     - Phases: 4
+  3. Call value generator:
+     ```bash
+     python .claude/hooks/plan-value-generator.py \
+       --plan-file plans/plotting-dark-mode/0-Overview.md
+     ```
+  4. Generated propositions include:
+     - Development efficiency value for visualization
+     - Token savings: ~1200 tokens (65% reduction)
+     - Security: matplotlib dependency assessment
+     - Time estimate: 6-8 hours based on plotting complexity
+  5. Validate and finalize plan
+  ```
+
+- [ ] **Best Practices Guide**
+  ```markdown
+  ## Value Proposition Best Practices
+  
+  ### For Plan Creators
+  - Always call value generation hooks before finalizing plans
+  - Review generated security assessments for accuracy
+  - Customize token estimates based on actual plan complexity
+  - Exclude FAIR data compliance from scope
+  
+  ### For Plan Reviewers  
+  - Verify all required proposition sections present
+  - Check security assessment scope (code-level only)
+  - Validate token savings are realistic (60-80% range)
+  - Ensure scientific software considerations addressed
+  
+  ### For Plan Implementation
+  - Use value propositions to guide implementation priorities
+  - Track actual vs estimated time for velocity learning
+  - Monitor actual token usage against predictions
+  - Document security findings during implementation
+  ```
+
+### Task 5.4: Update Settings and Configuration (30 minutes)
+- [ ] **Hook Configuration**
+  - Update `.claude/settings.json` if needed for hook integration
+  - Configure hook permissions and execution settings
+  - Document hook dependencies and requirements
+
+- [ ] **Agent Configuration Updates**
+  - Update agent routing rules for value proposition tasks
+  - Configure UnifiedPlanCoordinator hook calling permissions
+  - Set validation requirements for plan completion
+
+## ✅ Phase Success Criteria
+- [ ] CLAUDE.md fully updated with value proposition requirements
+- [ ] UnifiedPlanCoordinator agent enhanced with hook workflow
+- [ ] Usage examples and best practices documented
+- [ ] Configuration files updated for hook integration
+- [ ] Migration guide available for existing plans
+- [ ] Developer training materials created
+- [ ] All documentation clearly excludes FAIR compliance
+
+## 🔧 Testing Documentation
+- [ ] **Documentation Accuracy**
+  - Verify all examples work as documented
+  - Test hook command line examples
+  - Validate agent workflow instructions
+  - Check best practices against actual usage
+  
+- [ ] **User Experience**
+  - Test documentation clarity with sample users
+  - Verify migration guide completeness
+  - Validate training material effectiveness
+
+## 🔄 Dependencies and Integration Points
+- **Input**: Working hooks from Phases 3 and 4
+- **Output**: Complete documentation and agent updates
+- **Dependencies**: Must align with existing SolarWindPy documentation standards
+- **Validation**: Documentation should enable successful plan creation
+
+## 🚧 Implementation Notes
+*[Track documentation changes, agent updates, and user feedback]*
+
+---
+**Previous Phase**: [4-Value-Validator-Hook-Implementation.md](./4-Value-Validator-Hook-Implementation.md)  
+**Next Phase**: [6-Integration-Testing-Validation.md](./6-Integration-Testing-Validation.md)