solarwindpy 0.0.1.dev0__py3-none-any.whl → 0.1.1__py3-none-any.whl

plans/template-value-propositions/2-Plan-Template-Enhancement.md

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+# Phase 2: Plan Template Enhancement
+
+## Phase Metadata
+- **Phase**: 2 of 6
+- **Title**: Plan Template Enhancement
+- **Estimated Time**: 2-3 hours
+- **Status**: Planning
+- **Dependencies**: Phase 1 completed
+- **Checksum**: `<checksum-placeholder>`
+
+## 🎯 Phase Objective
+Update the `plans/0-overview-template.md` and related templates to include comprehensive value proposition sections with placeholders for automated generation, ensuring backward compatibility with existing plans.
+
+## 📋 Phase Tasks
+
+### Task 2.1: Update Main Overview Template (60 minutes)
+- [ ] **Add Value Proposition Sections to `plans/0-overview-template.md`**
+  - 📊 Value Proposition Analysis [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+  - 💰 Resource & Cost Analysis [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+  - ⚠️ Risk Assessment & Mitigation [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+  - 🔒 Security Proposition [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+  - 💾 Token Usage Optimization [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+  - ⏱️ Time Investment Analysis [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+  - 🎯 Usage & Adoption Metrics [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+
+### Task 2.2: Create Template Placeholders (45 minutes)
+- [ ] **Placeholder Format Design**
+  ```markdown
+  ## 📊 Value Proposition Analysis [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+  <!-- VALUE_PROPOSITION_PLACEHOLDER -->
+  *This section will be automatically generated by .claude/hooks/plan-value-generator.py*
+  
+  ### Scientific Software Development Value
+  [Generated content will include research efficiency and development quality metrics]
+  
+  ### Developer Productivity Value
+  [Generated content will include planning efficiency and resource optimization]
+  ```
+
+### Task 2.3: Ensure Backward Compatibility (30 minutes)
+- [ ] **Compatibility Strategy**
+  - Existing templates continue to work unchanged
+  - New sections marked as [AUTO-GENERATED] to avoid manual editing
+  - Fallback behavior when hooks are not available
+  - Migration path for existing plans (optional enhancement)
+
+### Task 2.4: Update Phase Template (30 minutes)
+- [ ] **Enhance `plans/N-phase-template.md`** (if exists)
+  - Add phase-level value considerations
+  - Include mini risk assessments per phase
+  - Token usage tracking per phase
+  - Security checkpoints for sensitive phases
+
+### Task 2.5: Template Validation System (15 minutes)
+- [ ] **Create Template Validation Rules**
+  - Check for required section placeholders
+  - Validate placeholder format consistency
+  - Ensure backward compatibility preserved
+  - Document template versioning strategy
+
+## 🔧 Implementation Details
+
+### Template Section Structure
+```markdown
+## 📊 Value Proposition Analysis [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+<!-- This section automatically generated by plan-value-generator.py -->
+
+### Scientific Software Development Value
+- **Research Efficiency**: [Auto-generated analysis]
+- **Development Quality**: [Auto-generated metrics] 
+- **Domain Integration**: [Auto-generated SolarWindPy-specific benefits]
+
+### Developer Productivity Value
+- **Planning Efficiency**: [Auto-generated time savings]
+- **Resource Optimization**: [Auto-generated resource analysis]
+- **Token Usage**: [Auto-generated optimization metrics]
+
+## 💰 Resource & Cost Analysis [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+
+### Development Investment
+- **Implementation Time**: [Auto-generated phase breakdown]
+- **Maintenance Overhead**: [Auto-generated maintenance estimates]
+- **Infrastructure Requirements**: [Auto-generated resource needs]
+
+### Token Usage Economics
+- **Current vs Enhanced**: [Auto-generated comparison]
+- **Break-even Analysis**: [Auto-generated ROI calculation]
+- **Long-term Benefits**: [Auto-generated efficiency projection]
+
+## ⚠️ Risk Assessment & Mitigation [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+
+### Technical Implementation Risks
+| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
+|------|------------|--------|-------------------|
+| [Auto-generated risk entries with mitigation strategies] |
+
+### Project Management Risks
+[Auto-generated project risk analysis]
+
+### Scientific Workflow Risks
+[Auto-generated workflow impact analysis]
+
+## 🔒 Security Proposition [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+
+### Code-Level Security Assessment
+- **Dependency Vulnerabilities**: [Auto-generated vulnerability scan]
+- **Authentication/Access Control**: [Auto-generated auth impact analysis]
+- **Attack Surface Analysis**: [Auto-generated exposure assessment]
+- **Development Workflow Security**: [Auto-generated workflow security review]
+
+**Note**: This assessment covers code-level security only. No FAIR data compliance or metadata security requirements.
+
+## 💾 Token Usage Optimization [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+
+### Current vs Optimized Usage
+- **Manual Planning**: [Auto-generated current usage]
+- **Automated Generation**: [Auto-generated optimized usage]
+- **Net Savings**: [Auto-generated savings calculation]
+
+### Context Preservation Benefits
+[Auto-generated context optimization analysis]
+
+## ⏱️ Time Investment Analysis [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+
+### Implementation Time Breakdown
+[Auto-generated phase-by-phase time estimates]
+
+### Time Savings Analysis
+[Auto-generated efficiency improvements]
+
+### Break-Even Analysis
+[Auto-generated ROI timeline]
+
+## 🎯 Usage & Adoption Metrics [REQUIRED - AUTO-GENERATED]
+
+### Target Use Cases
+[Auto-generated use case analysis]
+
+### Adoption Strategy
+[Auto-generated rollout approach]
+
+### Success Metrics
+[Auto-generated measurable outcomes]
+```
+
+### Placeholder Integration Strategy
+1. **Template Loading**: UnifiedPlanCoordinator loads template with placeholders
+2. **Hook Execution**: Calls `plan-value-generator.py` with plan metadata
+3. **Content Replacement**: Replaces placeholders with generated content
+4. **Validation**: Optional validation via `plan-value-validator.py`
+5. **Final Template**: Saves completed plan with all sections populated
+
+### Backward Compatibility Approach
+- **Existing Plans**: Continue to work without modification
+- **New Plans**: Automatically include value propositions
+- **Migration**: Optional enhancement for existing active plans
+- **Fallback**: Manual section completion if hooks unavailable
+
+## ✅ Phase Success Criteria
+- [ ] `0-overview-template.md` updated with all value proposition sections
+- [ ] Placeholder format consistent and clearly marked
+- [ ] Backward compatibility fully preserved
+- [ ] Template validation rules established
+- [ ] Integration points with hooks clearly defined
+- [ ] Template ready for hook-based content generation
+
+## 🔄 Dependencies and Integration Points
+- **Input**: Framework design from Phase 1
+- **Output**: Enhanced templates ready for hook integration
+- **Dependencies**: Must work with existing UnifiedPlanCoordinator workflow
+- **Validation**: Templates must support both manual and automated content
+
+## 🚧 Implementation Notes
+*[Track template changes, compatibility issues, and design decisions]*
+
+---
+**Previous Phase**: [1-Value-Proposition-Framework-Design.md](./1-Value-Proposition-Framework-Design.md)  
+**Next Phase**: [3-Value-Generator-Hook-Implementation.md](./3-Value-Generator-Hook-Implementation.md)

plans/template-value-propositions/3-Value-Generator-Hook-Implementation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+# Phase 3: Value Generator Hook Implementation
+
+## Phase Metadata
+- **Phase**: 3 of 6
+- **Title**: Value Generator Hook Implementation
+- **Estimated Time**: 3-4 hours
+- **Status**: Planning
+- **Dependencies**: Phase 1, 2 completed
+- **Checksum**: `<checksum-placeholder>`
+
+## 🎯 Phase Objective
+Implement `.claude/hooks/plan-value-generator.py` - the core hook that programmatically generates comprehensive value propositions for SolarWindPy plans, focusing on practical assessments without requiring FAIR data compliance.
+
+## 📋 Phase Tasks
+
+### Task 3.1: Hook Architecture and Core Framework (60 minutes)
+- [ ] **Create Basic Hook Structure**
+  ```python
+  #!/usr/bin/env python3
+  """
+  SolarWindPy Plan Value Proposition Generator
+  Generates comprehensive value propositions for scientific software plans
+  """
+  
+  import argparse
+  import json
+  import re
+  from pathlib import Path
+  from typing import Dict, List, Optional
+  ```
+
+- [ ] **Implement Command Line Interface**
+  - `--plan-file`: Path to plan overview file
+  - `--plan-data`: JSON string with plan metadata
+  - `--output-format`: markdown (default) or json
+  - `--include-all`: Include all proposition types
+  - `--exclude-fair`: Explicitly exclude FAIR compliance (default)
+
+### Task 3.2: Value Proposition Generation Logic (90 minutes)
+
+#### Scientific Software Development Value Generator
+- [ ] **Research Efficiency Assessment**
+  ```python
+  def generate_research_efficiency_value(plan_data: Dict) -> str:
+      """Generate research efficiency improvements analysis."""
+      
+      efficiency_factors = {
+          'core/': 'High impact on fundamental physics calculations',
+          'plotting/': 'Medium impact on data visualization workflows',
+          'fitfunctions/': 'High impact on statistical analysis capabilities',
+          'instabilities/': 'Critical impact on plasma physics research',
+          'tools/': 'Low to medium impact on utility functions'
+      }
+      
+      # Analyze affected areas
+      affected_areas = plan_data.get('affects', '')
+      efficiency_impacts = []
+      
+      for area, impact in efficiency_factors.items():
+          if area in affected_areas:
+              efficiency_impacts.append(f"- **{area}**: {impact}")
+      
+      return format_efficiency_analysis(efficiency_impacts, plan_data)
+  ```
+
+#### Developer Productivity Value Generator
+- [ ] **Token Usage Calculator**
+  ```python
+  def calculate_token_optimization(plan_data: Dict) -> Dict:
+      """Calculate token usage optimization metrics."""
+      
+      # Base token costs for manual proposition writing
+      manual_tokens = {
+          'simple_plan': 1200,
+          'moderate_plan': 1800,
+          'complex_plan': 2500,
+          'physics_plan': 3000  # Extra context for physics validation
+      }
+      
+      # Automated generation costs
+      automated_tokens = {
+          'hook_execution': 100,
+          'content_insertion': 150,
+          'validation': 50
+      }
+      
+      plan_complexity = assess_plan_complexity(plan_data)
+      current_cost = manual_tokens[plan_complexity]
+      optimized_cost = sum(automated_tokens.values())
+      
+      return {
+          'current_usage': current_cost,
+          'optimized_usage': optimized_cost,
+          'savings': current_cost - optimized_cost,
+          'savings_percent': ((current_cost - optimized_cost) / current_cost) * 100
+      }
+  ```
+
+### Task 3.3: Security Proposition Generator (75 minutes)
+- [ ] **Code-Level Security Assessment** (No FAIR Data)
+  ```python
+  def generate_security_proposition(plan_data: Dict) -> str:
+      """Generate practical security assessment for scientific software."""
+      
+      security_assessment = {
+          'dependency_scan': assess_dependency_security(plan_data),
+          'auth_impact': analyze_authentication_changes(plan_data),
+          'attack_surface': evaluate_code_exposure(plan_data),
+          'workflow_security': check_development_security(plan_data)
+      }
+      
+      # Explicitly exclude FAIR data assessments
+      excluded_areas = [
+          'metadata_security',
+          'data_format_integrity', 
+          'persistent_identifier_management',
+          'fair_compliance_checking'
+      ]
+      
+      return format_security_markdown(security_assessment, excluded_areas)
+  ```
+
+- [ ] **Dependency Vulnerability Scanner**
+  ```python
+  def assess_dependency_security(plan_data: Dict) -> Dict:
+      """Scan for dependency security issues."""
+      
+      # Check if plan introduces new dependencies
+      new_deps = extract_dependencies(plan_data.get('description', ''))
+      
+      # Common scientific Python packages with known considerations
+      security_notes = {
+          'numpy': 'Generally secure, check version for known CVEs',
+          'scipy': 'Trusted scientific package, minimal risk',
+          'matplotlib': 'Visualization library, low security risk',
+          'pandas': 'Check for CSV parsing vulnerabilities',
+          'requests': 'Network library, validate SSL/TLS usage',
+          'jupyter': 'Development tool, consider execution risks'
+      }
+      
+      vulnerability_assessment = []
+      for dep in new_deps:
+          if dep.lower() in security_notes:
+              vulnerability_assessment.append({
+                  'package': dep,
+                  'assessment': security_notes[dep.lower()],
+                  'action_required': 'Version check and security review'
+              })
+      
+      return {
+          'new_dependencies': new_deps,
+          'assessments': vulnerability_assessment,
+          'overall_risk': calculate_dependency_risk(new_deps)
+      }
+  ```
+
+### Task 3.4: Resource & Cost Analysis Generator (45 minutes)
+- [ ] **Development Time Estimation**
+  ```python
+  def estimate_development_cost(plan_data: Dict) -> Dict:
+      """Generate development cost analysis."""
+      
+      # Time estimation based on plan complexity and SolarWindPy patterns
+      base_hours = {
+          'simple': 4,
+          'moderate': 8,
+          'complex': 16,
+          'physics_heavy': 24
+      }
+      
+      # Multipliers based on affected areas
+      complexity_multipliers = {
+          'core/': 1.5,  # Core physics requires extra validation
+          'instabilities/': 1.8,  # Plasma physics complexity
+          'plotting/': 0.9,  # Visualization usually straightforward
+          'tests/': 1.2,  # Testing overhead
+          'docs/': 0.8   # Documentation generally faster
+      }
+      
+      plan_type = classify_plan_complexity(plan_data)
+      base_estimate = base_hours[plan_type]
+      
+      # Apply multipliers based on affected areas
+      affected = plan_data.get('affects', '')
+      final_multiplier = 1.0
+      
+      for area, multiplier in complexity_multipliers.items():
+          if area in affected:
+              final_multiplier *= multiplier
+      
+      total_estimate = base_estimate * final_multiplier
+      
+      return {
+          'base_estimate_hours': base_estimate,
+          'complexity_multiplier': final_multiplier,
+          'total_estimate_hours': total_estimate,
+          'confidence_interval': f"{total_estimate * 0.8}-{total_estimate * 1.3}",
+          'breakdown': generate_time_breakdown(plan_data, total_estimate)
+      }
+  ```
+
+### Task 3.5: Integration and Utility Functions (30 minutes)
+- [ ] **Plan Data Parser**
+  ```python
+  def parse_plan_metadata(plan_file: Path) -> Dict:
+      """Extract plan metadata from overview file."""
+      
+      with open(plan_file, 'r') as f:
+          content = f.read()
+      
+      metadata = {}
+      
+      # Extract key information using regex
+      metadata['plan_name'] = extract_field(content, r'Plan Name\*\*:\s*(.+)')
+      metadata['phases'] = count_phases(content)
+      metadata['estimated_duration'] = extract_field(content, r'Estimated Duration\*\*:\s*(.+)')
+      metadata['affects'] = extract_field(content, r'Affects\*\*:\s*(.+)')
+      metadata['description'] = extract_objective(content)
+      
+      return metadata
+  ```
+
+- [ ] **Markdown Formatter**
+  ```python
+  def format_value_propositions(propositions: Dict) -> str:
+      """Format all value propositions as markdown."""
+      
+      sections = []
+      
+      # Generate each section
+      sections.append("## 📊 Value Proposition Analysis")
+      sections.append(propositions['scientific_value'])
+      sections.append(propositions['developer_value'])
+      
+      sections.append("## 💰 Resource & Cost Analysis")
+      sections.append(propositions['cost_analysis'])
+      
+      sections.append("## ⚠️ Risk Assessment & Mitigation")
+      sections.append(propositions['risk_assessment'])
+      
+      sections.append("## 🔒 Security Proposition")
+      sections.append(propositions['security_assessment'])
+      sections.append("**Note**: Code-level security only. No FAIR data compliance requirements.")
+      
+      sections.append("## 💾 Token Usage Optimization")
+      sections.append(propositions['token_optimization'])
+      
+      sections.append("## ⏱️ Time Investment Analysis")
+      sections.append(propositions['time_analysis'])
+      
+      sections.append("## 🎯 Usage & Adoption Metrics")
+      sections.append(propositions['usage_metrics'])
+      
+      return "\n\n".join(sections)
+  ```
+
+## ✅ Phase Success Criteria
+- [ ] Complete `plan-value-generator.py` hook implemented
+- [ ] All value proposition types supported (except FAIR)
+- [ ] Security assessment focused on code-level only
+- [ ] Token optimization calculations accurate
+- [ ] Command line interface functional
+- [ ] Integration with template placeholders working
+- [ ] SolarWindPy-specific logic included
+- [ ] Performance acceptable (<5 seconds execution)
+
+## 🔧 Testing Approach
+- [ ] **Unit Tests for Core Functions**
+  - Value proposition generation logic
+  - Security assessment accuracy
+  - Token calculation verification
+  - Plan metadata parsing
+  
+- [ ] **Integration Tests**
+  - Hook execution with sample plans
+  - Template placeholder replacement
+  - Command line interface validation
+  - Error handling for invalid inputs
+
+## 🔄 Dependencies and Integration Points
+- **Input**: Enhanced templates from Phase 2
+- **Output**: Generated value propositions ready for template insertion
+- **Integration**: Must work with UnifiedPlanCoordinator agent workflow
+- **Performance**: Target <5 seconds execution time
+
+## 🚧 Implementation Notes
+*[Track hook development, performance issues, and integration challenges]*
+
+---
+**Previous Phase**: [2-Plan-Template-Enhancement.md](./2-Plan-Template-Enhancement.md)  
+**Next Phase**: [4-Value-Validator-Hook-Implementation.md](./4-Value-Validator-Hook-Implementation.md)