solarwindpy 0.0.1.dev0__py3-none-any.whl → 0.1.0__py3-none-any.whl

plans/github-issues-migration/2-Migration-Tool-Rewrite.md

@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+# Phase 2: Migration Tool Complete Rewrite
+
+## Phase Metadata
+- **Phase**: 2/5
+- **Estimated Duration**: 5-6 hours
+- **Dependencies**: Phase 1 (labels and templates)
+- **Status**: Not Started
+
+## 🎯 Phase Objective
+Completely rewrite `plans/issues_from_plans.py` as `PropositionsAwareMigrator` class with comprehensive support for propositions framework preservation and closeout documentation migration.
+
+## 🧠 Phase Context
+The existing `issues_from_plans.py` is a basic script focused on simple YAML frontmatter. The new PropositionsAwareMigrator must handle the complete propositions framework, preserve 85% implementation decision capture, and focus on reliability over complex feature migration.
+
+## 📋 Implementation Tasks
+
+### Task Group 1: Core Architecture Design
+- [ ] **Design PropositionsAwareMigrator class** (Est: 45 min) - Core architecture and interfaces
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: OOP design with pluggable validators and processors
+- [ ] **Create base migration framework** (Est: 60 min) - Abstract base classes and common functionality
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Extensible design for future migration needs
+- [ ] **Implement propositions parser** (Est: 75 min) - Parse and validate all 5 proposition types
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Risk, Value, Cost, Token, Usage propositions extraction
+- [ ] **Create metadata preservation system** (Est: 50 min) - Preserve plan metadata in GitHub issue format
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Branch info, dependencies, affected areas tracking
+
+### 🔄 Context Management Point
+**IMPORTANT**: After completing this Task Group, the user should manually compact the conversation context to ensure continued development efficiency. This prevents token limit issues during extended implementation sessions.
+
+To compact: Save current progress, start fresh session with compacted state, and continue with next Task Group.
+
+### Task Group 2: Plan Structure Processing
+- [ ] **Implement overview plan processor** (Est: 90 min) - Convert 0-Overview.md to GitHub issue
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Complete propositions framework preservation
+- [ ] **Implement phase plan processor** (Est: 70 min) - Convert N-Phase.md files to issues
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Task tracking, checksum preservation, progress migration
+- [ ] **Implement closeout processor** (Est: 60 min) - Migrate implementation decisions and lessons learned
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: 85% decision capture preservation target
+- [ ] **Create cross-plan dependency tracker** (Est: 45 min) - GitHub issue linking for dependencies
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Preserve resource conflict detection and coordination
+
+### 🔄 Context Management Point
+**IMPORTANT**: After completing this Task Group, the user should manually compact the conversation context to ensure continued development efficiency. This prevents token limit issues during extended implementation sessions.
+
+To compact: Save current progress, start fresh session with compacted state, and continue with next Task Group.
+
+### Task Group 3: Advanced Features
+- [ ] **Create batch processing system** (Est: 40 min) - Handle large-scale migrations efficiently
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: API rate limiting and progress tracking
+- [ ] **Implement validation framework** (Est: 50 min) - Comprehensive migration validation
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Pre/post migration validation and rollback support
+- [ ] **Add backup and rollback system** (Est: 35 min) - Safe migration with recovery options
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Local backup before migration, GitHub issue deletion capability
+
+### 🔄 Context Management Point
+**IMPORTANT**: After completing this Task Group, the user should manually compact the conversation context to ensure continued development efficiency. This prevents token limit issues during extended implementation sessions.
+
+To compact: Save current progress, start fresh session with compacted state, and continue with next Task Group.
+
+### Task Group 4: CLI Interface & Error Handling
+- [ ] **Create CLI interface with Click** (Est: 45 min) - User-friendly command-line interface
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Progress reporting, dry-run mode, selective migration
+- [ ] **Implement comprehensive error handling** (Est: 40 min) - Robust error management and recovery
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: GitHub API errors, network issues, data validation failures
+- [ ] **Add progress reporting system** (Est: 30 min) - Real-time migration progress and statistics
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Progress bars, ETA calculation, success/failure counts
+- [ ] **Create migration summary reports** (Est: 25 min) - Detailed post-migration analysis
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Data preservation verification, link mapping, success metrics
+
+### 🔄 Context Management Point
+**IMPORTANT**: After completing this Task Group, the user should manually compact the conversation context to ensure continued development efficiency. This prevents token limit issues during extended implementation sessions.
+
+To compact: Save current progress, start fresh session with compacted state, and continue with next Task Group.
+
+### Task Group 4 Propositions Analysis:
+
+**Risk Assessment**: Medium complexity CLI may deter adoption; high error handling needs for API failures; comprehensive testing required for mock responses.
+
+**Value Proposition**: 5x faster than web interface; scriptable workflows; batch processing; aligns with developer expectations.
+
+**Cost Analysis**: 2.5 hours implementation + 1 hour testing + 30 min docs = 4 hours total; ~13 hours/year maintenance after Year 1.
+
+**Token Optimization**: Manual migration ~2000 tokens/plan → CLI automation ~200 tokens/plan (90% reduction).
+
+**Usage Metrics**: 10 plans/hour throughput; <2% error rate target; 80% developer preference for CLI.
+
+**Scope Alignment**: Score 20/100 (acceptable development tooling scope).
+
+### Task Group 5: Testing & Documentation
+- [ ] **Create comprehensive unit tests** (Est: 90 min) - Test all migration components
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Propositions parsing, metadata preservation, validation logic
+- [ ] **Implement integration tests** (Est: 60 min) - End-to-end migration testing
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Real GitHub API testing with test repository
+- [ ] **Create migration documentation** (Est: 40 min) - User guide and technical documentation
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Usage examples, troubleshooting, migration best practices
+- [ ] **Add performance benchmarks** (Est: 30 min) - Migration performance validation
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Large plan set performance, API rate limit handling
+
+## ✅ Phase Acceptance Criteria
+- [ ] PropositionsAwareMigrator class completely replaces issues_from_plans.py
+- [ ] All 5 proposition types (Risk, Value, Cost, Token, Usage) preserved in migration
+- [ ] 85% implementation decision capture maintained in closeout processing
+- [ ] Velocity metrics successfully migrated to GitHub issue metadata
+- [ ] Cross-plan dependencies preserved through GitHub issue linking
+- [ ] Batch processing handles large-scale migrations (50+ plans) efficiently
+- [ ] Comprehensive validation framework prevents data loss
+- [ ] CLI interface provides user-friendly migration experience
+- [ ] Unit test coverage ≥ 95% for all migration components
+- [ ] Integration tests validate end-to-end migration accuracy
+- [ ] Performance benchmarks demonstrate acceptable migration speed
+- [ ] Documentation enables team adoption and troubleshooting
+
+## 🧪 Phase Testing Strategy
+**Unit Testing**:
+- Propositions parser testing with comprehensive examples
+- Metadata preservation validation across all plan types
+- Error handling testing for various failure scenarios
+- Validation framework testing with valid/invalid data
+
+**Integration Testing**:
+- End-to-end migration with test GitHub repository
+- Large-scale migration testing with historical plans
+- API rate limiting and retry logic validation
+- Cross-plan dependency preservation testing
+
+**Performance Testing**:
+- Migration speed benchmarks with varying plan sizes
+- Memory usage validation for large batch operations
+- GitHub API efficiency and rate limit compliance
+- Progress reporting accuracy and responsiveness
+
+## 🔧 Phase Technical Requirements
+**Core Dependencies**:
+- Python 3.8+ with typing support for robust interfaces
+- `click` for CLI interface and command-line argument handling
+- `requests` for GitHub API interaction with session management
+- `pyyaml` for YAML parsing and frontmatter handling
+- `rich` for progress reporting and enhanced CLI output
+
+**GitHub Integration**:
+- GitHub API v4 (GraphQL) for efficient batch operations
+- Personal access token with repository admin permissions
+- Issue creation, labeling, and linking capabilities
+- Milestone and project integration for advanced features
+
+**Testing Framework**:
+- `pytest` for comprehensive unit and integration testing
+- `pytest-mock` for GitHub API mocking in unit tests
+- Test GitHub repository for integration testing
+- Performance testing utilities and benchmarking tools
+
+## 📂 Phase Affected Areas
+- `plans/issues_from_plans.py` → Complete rewrite as PropositionsAwareMigrator
+- New test files: `tests/migration/test_propositions_migrator.py`
+- New documentation: `docs/migration-guide.md`
+- Dependencies: Update requirements.txt with new packages
+- CLI scripts: New migration command integration
+
+## 📊 Phase Progress Tracking
+
+### Current Status
+- **Tasks Completed**: 0/17
+- **Time Invested**: 0h of 6h estimated
+- **Completion Percentage**: 0%
+- **Last Updated**: 2025-08-19
+
+### Blockers & Issues
+- Dependency: Phase 1 completion required for template structure
+- Risk: GitHub API complexity may require additional iteration
+- Risk: Propositions framework preservation complexity
+
+### Next Actions
+- Begin with core architecture design and base framework
+- Implement propositions parser as critical component
+- Create comprehensive test suite parallel to development
+- Validate with simple migration examples before complex features
+
+## 💬 Phase Implementation Notes
+
+### Implementation Decisions
+- Complete rewrite chosen over incremental updates for clean architecture
+- Object-oriented design enables future extensibility and maintenance
+- Click CLI framework provides professional command-line interface
+- Rich library enables enhanced progress reporting and user experience
+- GraphQL API chosen for efficiency in batch operations
+
+### Lessons Learned
+*Will be updated during implementation*
+
+### Phase Dependencies Resolution
+- Requires Phase 1 label system and issue templates
+- Provides migration capability for Phase 4 validated migration
+- Establishes foundation for Phase 3 CLI integration workflows
+
+---
+*Phase 2 of 5 - GitHub Issues Migration with Propositions Framework - Last Updated: 2025-08-19*
+*See [0-Overview.md](./0-Overview.md) for complete plan context and cross-phase coordination.*

plans/github-issues-migration/3-CLI-Integration-Automation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+# Phase 3: CLI Integration & Automation
+
+## Phase Metadata
+- **Phase**: 3/5
+- **Estimated Duration**: 3-4 hours
+- **Dependencies**: Phase 2 (PropositionsAwareMigrator)
+- **Status**: Not Started
+
+## 🎯 Phase Objective
+Integrate PropositionsAwareMigrator with essential GitHub CLI (`gh`) scripts and create streamlined utilities for multi-computer plan synchronization in GitHub Issues.
+
+## 🧠 Phase Context
+This phase creates essential CLI tools for multi-computer plan synchronization. Focus on 3 core utilities that enable instant plan access across development machines while maintaining validation capabilities.
+
+## 📋 Implementation Tasks
+
+### Task Group 1: GitHub CLI Script Development
+- [ ] **Create plan creation script** (Est: 45 min) - `gh-create-plan.sh` for new GitHub issue plans
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Interactive plan creation with propositions framework
+- [ ] **Create plan status script** (Est: 30 min) - `gh-plan-status.sh` for cross-plan monitoring
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Dashboard generation using GitHub API and CLI
+- [ ] **Create plan sync script** (Est: 40 min) - `gh-sync-plans.sh` for multi-computer synchronization
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Bidirectional sync between local plans and GitHub Issues
+
+### Task Group 2: Hook System Replacement
+- [ ] **Replace plan-completion-manager.py** (Est: 50 min) - Convert to gh CLI-based shell script
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Automatic plan completion detection and GitHub integration
+- [ ] **Update git-workflow-validator.sh** (Est: 25 min) - Add GitHub Issues validation
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Ensure plan/* branches have corresponding GitHub issues
+- [ ] **Create gh-workflow-hooks.sh** (Est: 40 min) - Central GitHub workflow validation
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Pre-commit and post-merge GitHub Issues synchronization
+- [ ] **Update session validation scripts** (Est: 20 min) - GitHub Issues context loading
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Load active plans from GitHub Issues into session context
+
+### Task Group 3: Multi-Computer Workflow Integration
+- [ ] **Create computer sync validation** (Est: 35 min) - Validate plan access across 3 development machines
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Test instant plan access from macOS, Linux, Windows environments
+- [ ] **Implement sync conflict resolution** (Est: 25 min) - Handle concurrent edits across machines
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: GitHub's native conflict resolution for plan updates
+
+### Task Group 4: Integration Testing & Validation
+- [ ] **Test CLI script integration** (Est: 35 min) - Validate all gh CLI scripts work correctly
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: End-to-end workflow testing with real GitHub repository
+- [ ] **Validate hook replacement** (Est: 25 min) - Ensure Python hook functionality preserved
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Compare old vs new hook behavior and outcomes
+- [ ] **Test essential workflows** (Est: 30 min) - Validate core CLI tools
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Cross-plan coordination and conflict detection accuracy
+- [ ] **Performance testing** (Est: 20 min) - GitHub API efficiency and response times
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Large-scale operation performance validation
+
+## ✅ Phase Acceptance Criteria
+- [ ] All `.claude/hooks/` Python scripts replaced with equivalent gh CLI functionality
+- [ ] Plan creation, status, migration, and completion scripts fully functional
+- [ ] Automated labeling system accurately categorizes plans across 41 labels
+- [ ] Cross-plan dependency detection and conflict resolution automated
+- [ ] Velocity tracking integration maintains historical data accuracy
+- [ ] Git workflow validation seamlessly integrates GitHub Issues
+- [ ] Performance meets or exceeds current Python-based hook system
+- [ ] All essential CLI tools tested and validated with real scenarios
+- [ ] Documentation updated for new CLI-based workflow
+- [ ] Team training materials prepared for transition
+
+## 🧪 Phase Testing Strategy
+**CLI Script Testing**:
+- Individual script functionality validation
+- Parameter passing and error handling testing
+- GitHub API integration and authentication testing
+- Progress reporting and user interaction validation
+
+**Multi-Computer Workflow Testing**:
+- Plan synchronization across 3 development machines
+- Instant access validation from any machine
+- Conflict resolution for concurrent plan updates
+- Cross-machine context switching efficiency
+
+**Integration Testing**:
+- End-to-end plan lifecycle testing (create → implement → complete)
+- Git workflow integration with GitHub Issues synchronization
+- Performance comparison with existing Python-based system
+- Error handling and recovery testing for various failure modes
+
+## 🔧 Phase Technical Requirements
+**Core Dependencies**:
+- GitHub CLI (`gh`) 2.0+ with full API support
+- Bash 4.0+ for advanced shell scripting features
+- `jq` for JSON processing and GitHub API response handling
+- `curl` for direct API calls when gh CLI insufficient
+
+**GitHub Integration**:
+- Repository admin permissions for automated operations
+- API rate limit monitoring and management
+
+**System Integration**:
+- Existing `.claude/hooks/` directory structure preservation
+- Git hook integration points maintained
+- Session validation system compatibility
+- Cross-platform shell script compatibility (macOS, Linux)
+
+## 📂 Phase Affected Areas
+- `.claude/hooks/` - Replace Python scripts with gh CLI shell scripts
+- `.claude/scripts/` - New CLI utilities and automation workflows
+- Git hooks - Integration with GitHub Issues workflow
+- Session validation - GitHub Issues context loading
+- Team workflow - New CLI-based plan management procedures
+
+## 📊 Phase Progress Tracking
+
+### Current Status
+- **Tasks Completed**: 0/11
+- **Time Invested**: 0h of 3.5h estimated
+- **Completion Percentage**: 0%
+- **Last Updated**: 2025-08-19
+
+### Blockers & Issues
+- Dependency: Phase 2 PropositionsAwareMigrator completion required
+- Risk: GitHub CLI API coverage may require additional curl scripting
+- Risk: Shell script complexity for advanced automation features
+
+### Next Actions
+- Begin with basic CLI scripts (create, status, migrate)
+- Test GitHub CLI capabilities thoroughly before implementation
+- Develop automation workflows incrementally with validation
+- Ensure cross-platform compatibility throughout development
+
+## 💬 Phase Implementation Notes
+
+### Implementation Decisions
+- GitHub CLI chosen over direct API calls for maintainability and authentication
+- Shell scripts preferred over Python for reduced dependencies and faster execution
+- Modular script design enables incremental adoption and testing
+- Automation workflows designed to be optional and configurable
+
+### Lessons Learned
+*Will be updated during implementation*
+
+### Phase Dependencies Resolution
+- Requires Phase 2 PropositionsAwareMigrator for migration functionality
+- Provides automation foundation for Phase 4 validated migration
+- Establishes CLI workflow for Phase 5 documentation and training
+
+---
+*Phase 3 of 5 - GitHub Issues Migration with Propositions Framework - Last Updated: 2025-08-19*
+*See [0-Overview.md](./0-Overview.md) for complete plan context and cross-phase coordination.*

plans/github-issues-migration/4-Validated-Migration.md

@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+# Phase 4: Validated Migration
+
+## Phase Metadata
+- **Phase**: 4/5
+- **Estimated Duration**: 3-4 hours
+- **Dependencies**: Phase 3 (CLI Integration & Automation)
+- **Status**: Not Started
+
+## 🎯 Phase Objective
+Execute selective migration of active and high-value completed plans to GitHub Issues with rigorous validation, zero data loss verification, and complete propositions framework preservation. Prioritize active plans for immediate multi-computer access.
+
+## 🧠 Phase Context
+This phase represents the selective transition from local plans to GitHub Issues. Active plans and select high-value completed plans will be migrated with 100% data preservation of propositions framework, implementation decisions, and cross-plan dependencies. Focus on enabling immediate multi-computer access over comprehensive historical migration.
+
+## 📋 Implementation Tasks
+
+### Task Group 1: Pre-Migration Validation
+- [ ] **Audit existing plans inventory** (Est: 30 min) - Complete catalog of all plans and their current status
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: plans/, plans/completed/, and active plan/* branches
+- [ ] **Validate migration tool readiness** (Est: 25 min) - Comprehensive PropositionsAwareMigrator testing
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: All Phase 2 components functional and validated
+- [ ] **Create backup procedures** (Est: 40 min) - Complete local backup before migration
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Git repository backup, plans/ directory preservation
+- [ ] **Establish validation criteria** (Est: 20 min) - Define success metrics for migration validation
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: 100% data preservation, propositions integrity, link preservation
+
+### 🔄 Context Management Point
+**IMPORTANT**: After completing this Task Group, the user should manually compact the conversation context to ensure continued development efficiency. This prevents token limit issues during extended implementation sessions.
+
+To compact: Save current progress, start fresh session with compacted state, and continue with next Task Group.
+
+### Task Group 2: Staged Migration Execution
+- [ ] **Migrate test plans** (Est: 45 min) - Small-scale migration with comprehensive validation
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: 2-3 representative plans for end-to-end testing
+- [ ] **Validate test migration** (Est: 35 min) - Detailed comparison of local vs GitHub content
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Propositions preservation, metadata accuracy, link integrity
+- [ ] **Migrate completed plans** (Est: 60 min) - Historical plans from plans/completed/
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Implementation decisions preservation, closeout documentation
+- [ ] **Migrate active plans** (Est: 75 min) - Current plans/ directory and plan/* branches
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Work-in-progress preservation, plan status migration
+
+### 🔄 Context Management Point
+**IMPORTANT**: After completing this Task Group, the user should manually compact the conversation context to ensure continued development efficiency. This prevents token limit issues during extended implementation sessions.
+
+To compact: Save current progress, start fresh session with compacted state, and continue with next Task Group.
+
+### Completed/Abandoned Plans Migration Analysis:
+
+**Risk Assessment**: Low data loss (read-only archives), Medium metadata reconstruction needs, High API rate limits for bulk operations.
+
+**Value Proposition**: Knowledge preservation, GitHub superior search, cross-referencing capabilities, learning repository for future decisions.
+
+**Cost Analysis**: ~2 hours for 10-15 plans, minimal storage, zero maintenance, immediate discoverability ROI.
+
+**Token Optimization**: ~500 tokens local search → ~50 tokens GitHub search (90% reduction).
+
+**Usage & Scope**: 2-3 monthly references, date/domain/outcome patterns, <30s retrieval target, 15/100 alignment (acceptable infrastructure).
+
+### Selective Migration Strategy:
+
+**Priority 1: Active Plans**
+- All plans in current plans/ root directory
+- All active plan/* branches for multi-computer access
+- Focus on immediate productivity gains
+
+**Priority 2: High-Value Completed Plans**
+- Plans with significant implementation decisions
+- Plans with reusable propositions patterns
+- Plans serving as reference for future work
+
+**Priority 3: Historical Plans (Optional)**
+- Comprehensive migration only if time permits
+- Focus on most recent and most referenced plans
+
+### Task Group 3: Comprehensive Validation
+- [ ] **Validate propositions preservation** (Est: 40 min) - All 5 proposition types correctly migrated
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Risk, Value, Cost, Token, Usage propositions integrity
+- [ ] **Validate implementation decisions** (Est: 35 min) - 85% decision capture preservation verified
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Closeout documentation and lessons learned migration
+- [ ] **Validate cross-plan dependencies** (Est: 25 min) - Plan relationships preserved through GitHub links
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Resource conflicts, prerequisites, coordination data
+
+### 🔄 Context Management Point
+**IMPORTANT**: After completing this Task Group, the user should manually compact the conversation context to ensure continued development efficiency. This prevents token limit issues during extended implementation sessions.
+
+To compact: Save current progress, start fresh session with compacted state, and continue with next Task Group.
+
+### Task Group 4: System Integration Testing
+- [ ] **Test GitHub workflow integration** (Est: 35 min) - CLI scripts with migrated issues
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Plan creation, status monitoring, completion workflows
+- [ ] **Test search and discovery** (Est: 30 min) - GitHub Issues search vs local file patterns
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Label filtering, content search, cross-plan navigation
+- [ ] **Test team workflow adoption** (Est: 45 min) - Real development scenarios with GitHub Issues
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Plan updates, progress tracking, collaboration features
+- [ ] **Performance validation** (Est: 20 min) - GitHub Issues performance vs local files
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Load times, search performance, bulk operations
+
+### 🔄 Context Management Point
+**IMPORTANT**: After completing this Task Group, the user should manually compact the conversation context to ensure continued development efficiency. This prevents token limit issues during extended implementation sessions.
+
+To compact: Save current progress, start fresh session with compacted state, and continue with next Task Group.
+
+### Task Group 5: Rollback Preparation & Documentation
+- [ ] **Create rollback procedures** (Est: 30 min) - Complete restoration process if migration fails
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: GitHub issue deletion, local system restoration, data recovery
+- [ ] **Document migration mapping** (Est: 25 min) - Local plan → GitHub issue correspondence
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Issue numbers, label mapping, link preservation
+- [ ] **Create migration report** (Est: 40 min) - Comprehensive migration success documentation
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Statistics, validation results, performance metrics
+- [ ] **Prepare team communication** (Est: 15 min) - Migration success announcement and next steps
+  - Commit: `<checksum>`
+  - Status: Pending
+  - Notes: Workflow changes, new procedures, training schedule
+
+## ✅ Phase Acceptance Criteria
+- [ ] 100% of existing plans successfully migrated to GitHub Issues
+- [ ] Zero data loss verified through comprehensive validation
+- [ ] All 5 proposition types preserved with 100% accuracy
+- [ ] 85% implementation decision capture maintained in migrated closeouts
+- [ ] Velocity metrics successfully transferred and accessible
+- [ ] Cross-plan dependencies preserved through GitHub issue linking
+- [ ] GitHub workflow integration fully functional with migrated data
+- [ ] Search and discovery capabilities match or exceed local file performance
+- [ ] Team workflow validation demonstrates successful adoption potential
+- [ ] Rollback procedures documented and tested
+- [ ] Migration report documents complete success and provides audit trail
+- [ ] Performance validation confirms acceptable GitHub Issues responsiveness
+
+## 🧪 Phase Testing Strategy
+**Migration Accuracy Testing**:
+- Byte-level comparison of propositions content before/after migration
+- Metadata integrity validation across all plan types
+- Link preservation testing for cross-plan references
+- Timestamp and versioning information preservation
+
+**Functionality Testing**:
+- CLI script integration with migrated GitHub Issues
+- Search functionality across all migrated content
+- Label filtering and categorization accuracy
+- Cross-plan navigation and dependency tracking
+
+**Performance Testing**:
+- GitHub Issues load time benchmarks
+- Search performance across large issue sets
+- Bulk operation efficiency (labeling, updating, linking)
+- API rate limit impact during normal operations
+
+**Rollback Testing**:
+- Complete rollback procedure execution with test data
+- Data recovery validation and integrity verification
+- Local system restoration functionality
+- GitHub issue cleanup and removal procedures
+
+## 🔧 Phase Technical Requirements
+**Migration Infrastructure**:
+- PropositionsAwareMigrator from Phase 2 fully functional
+- GitHub CLI integration from Phase 3 operational
+- GitHub repository with Phase 1 labels and templates
+- Sufficient GitHub API rate limits for bulk migration
+
+**Validation Framework**:
+- Automated comparison tools for content validation
+- GitHub API access for comprehensive issue analysis
+- Local file system access for pre-migration backup
+- Performance monitoring tools for responsiveness testing
+
+**Backup and Recovery**:
+- Complete Git repository backup procedures
+- GitHub issue bulk deletion capabilities
+- Local plans/ directory preservation methods
+- Rollback automation scripts and procedures
+
+## 📂 Phase Affected Areas
+- All existing plans in `plans/` and `plans/completed/`
+- Active plan branches (`plan/*`) with work-in-progress
+- Cross-plan coordination and dependency documentation
+- Team workflow procedures and documentation
+
+## 📊 Phase Progress Tracking
+
+### Current Status
+- **Tasks Completed**: 0/16
+- **Time Invested**: 0h of 3.5h estimated
+- **Completion Percentage**: 0%
+- **Last Updated**: 2025-08-19
+
+### Blockers & Issues
+- Dependency: Phase 3 CLI integration completion required
+- Risk: Large-scale migration may reveal unexpected edge cases
+- Risk: GitHub API rate limits may require staged migration approach
+
+### Next Actions
+- Complete comprehensive audit of all existing plans
+- Execute small-scale test migration with detailed validation
+- Develop rollback procedures before large-scale migration
+- Coordinate with team for migration timing and communication
+
+## 💬 Phase Implementation Notes
+
+### Implementation Decisions
+- Staged migration approach reduces risk and enables validation
+- Comprehensive backup procedures ensure zero risk of data loss
+- Parallel system validation confirms migration accuracy
+- Rollback procedures provide safety net for migration execution
+
+### Lessons Learned
+*Will be updated during implementation*
+
+### Phase Dependencies Resolution
+- Requires Phase 3 CLI integration for GitHub workflow functionality
+- Provides migrated system foundation for Phase 5 documentation and training
+- Validates complete migration capability before team adoption
+
+---
+*Phase 4 of 5 - GitHub Issues Migration with Propositions Framework - Last Updated: 2025-08-19*
+*See [0-Overview.md](./0-Overview.md) for complete plan context and cross-phase coordination.*