solarwindpy 0.0.1.dev0__py3-none-any.whl → 0.1.0__py3-none-any.whl

plans/cicd-architecture-redesign/7-Cleanup.md

@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+# Phase 7: Cleanup
+
+## Overview
+Remove legacy broken workflows and clean up the CI/CD infrastructure to leave only the new, functional workflow files that successfully deployed v0.1.0.
+
+## Objectives
+- Remove broken legacy workflow files
+- Clean up GitHub Actions history clutter
+- Prevent future confusion from non-functional workflows
+- Maintain audit trail of what was removed
+- Ensure new workflows remain operational
+
+## Tasks
+
+### Task 7.1: Document Legacy Workflows (10 minutes)
+**Purpose**: Create audit trail before deletion
+
+**Implementation Steps:**
+```bash
+# Document existing workflow files before removal
+ls -la .github/workflows/
+echo "Documenting legacy workflows before cleanup:"
+
+# List all workflow files with their status
+echo "Legacy workflows to be removed:"
+echo "- ci.yml (broken: 0-second duration, cache corruption)"
+echo "- publish.yml (broken: 0-second duration, YAML parsing issues)" 
+echo "- test-fix.yml (temporary diagnostic workflow)"
+
+echo "New functional workflows (keep):"  
+echo "- release-pipeline.yml (successfully deployed v0.1.0)"
+echo "- continuous-integration.yml (functional PR testing)"
+
+# Check if any workflows are currently running
+gh workflow list --repo $(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner)
+```
+
+### Task 7.2: Remove Broken Workflows (15 minutes)
+**Implementation Steps:**
+
+**Step 1: Remove ci.yml**
+```bash
+# Remove the broken ci.yml workflow
+rm .github/workflows/ci.yml
+echo "Removed ci.yml (broken cache configuration)"
+```
+
+**Step 2: Remove publish.yml**
+```bash
+# Remove the broken publish.yml workflow
+rm .github/workflows/publish.yml
+echo "Removed publish.yml (broken YAML literal block comments)"
+```
+
+**Step 3: Remove test-fix.yml**
+```bash
+# Remove the diagnostic workflow (no longer needed)
+rm .github/workflows/test-fix.yml
+echo "Removed test-fix.yml (diagnostic workflow no longer needed)"
+```
+
+**Step 4: Verify Removal**
+```bash
+# Confirm only functional workflows remain
+ls -la .github/workflows/
+echo "Remaining workflows:"
+ls .github/workflows/
+# Should show only: release-pipeline.yml, continuous-integration.yml
+```
+
+### Task 7.3: Commit Cleanup Changes (5 minutes)
+**Implementation Steps:**
+```bash
+# Add deletions to git
+git add .
+
+# Create descriptive commit message
+git commit -m "chore: remove legacy broken workflows
+
+Removed workflows:
+- ci.yml: Cache corruption causing 0-second duration failures
+- publish.yml: YAML parsing issues with inline comments
+- test-fix.yml: Diagnostic workflow no longer needed
+
+Retained functional workflows:
+- release-pipeline.yml: Successfully deployed v0.1.0 to PyPI
+- continuous-integration.yml: Working PR validation
+
+Cleanup completed after successful v0.1.0 release."
+
+# Push cleanup commit
+git push origin master
+echo "Legacy workflow cleanup committed to master"
+```
+
+## Validation Steps
+
+### Task 7.4: Verify Cleanup Success (5 minutes)
+**Check GitHub Actions Interface:**
+1. Navigate to repository Actions tab
+2. Verify only functional workflows appear in workflow list
+3. Confirm no broken workflows trigger on future commits
+4. Validate existing workflow runs remain in history
+
+**Expected State:**
+- **Workflow List**: Only shows release-pipeline and continuous-integration
+- **History**: Previous runs preserved for audit trail
+- **Future Triggers**: Only functional workflows execute
+- **No Errors**: No broken workflow trigger attempts
+
+### Task 7.5: Test Remaining Workflows (5 minutes)
+**Verify Functional Workflows Still Work:**
+
+**Test continuous-integration.yml:**
+```bash
+# Create test branch to trigger CI
+git checkout -b test/cleanup-validation
+echo "# Test commit to validate CI" >> README.md
+git add README.md
+git commit -m "test: validate CI after workflow cleanup"
+git push origin test/cleanup-validation
+
+# Create PR to trigger continuous-integration workflow
+gh pr create --title "Test: Validate CI after cleanup" \
+             --body "Testing that continuous-integration.yml still works after removing broken workflows"
+```
+
+**Monitor Workflow:**
+- Continuous integration should trigger on PR creation
+- Should run Python 3.12 tests on Ubuntu
+- Should complete successfully
+
+**Cleanup Test:**
+```bash
+# Close test PR and cleanup
+gh pr close --delete-branch
+git checkout master
+```
+
+## File Structure After Cleanup
+
+### Before Cleanup:
+```
+.github/workflows/
+├── ci.yml                    # BROKEN - to remove
+├── publish.yml               # BROKEN - to remove  
+├── test-fix.yml              # DIAGNOSTIC - to remove
+├── release-pipeline.yml      # FUNCTIONAL - keep
+└── continuous-integration.yml # FUNCTIONAL - keep
+```
+
+### After Cleanup:
+```
+.github/workflows/
+├── release-pipeline.yml      # Production releases
+└── continuous-integration.yml # PR validation
+```
+
+## Acceptance Criteria
+
+### Removal Success ✅
+- [ ] ci.yml deleted from repository
+- [ ] publish.yml deleted from repository
+- [ ] test-fix.yml deleted from repository
+- [ ] Deletion committed with descriptive message
+- [ ] Changes pushed to master branch
+
+### Functional Preservation ✅
+- [ ] release-pipeline.yml remains operational
+- [ ] continuous-integration.yml remains operational
+- [ ] New workflows still trigger correctly
+- [ ] No broken workflow execution attempts
+- [ ] GitHub Actions interface shows clean workflow list
+
+### Documentation ✅
+- [ ] Removal rationale documented in commit message
+- [ ] Audit trail preserved in git history
+- [ ] Functional workflows identified clearly
+- [ ] Cleanup process documented
+
+## Risk Mitigation
+
+### Accidental Functional Workflow Removal
+- **Verification**: Double-check file names before deletion
+- **Git History**: All changes tracked in version control
+- **Recovery**: Can restore from git history if needed
+- **Testing**: Validate remaining workflows after cleanup
+
+### GitHub Actions Confusion
+- **Clear Naming**: Functional workflows have descriptive names
+- **Documentation**: Commit messages explain what was removed and why
+- **Team Communication**: Notify team of cleanup completion
+
+### Future Development Impact
+- **Branch Protection**: Master branch rules still apply
+- **PR Process**: Continuous integration still validates PRs
+- **Release Process**: Production pipeline fully functional
+- **No Disruption**: Only broken, non-functional workflows removed
+
+## Benefits of Cleanup
+
+### Developer Experience
+- **Reduced Confusion**: No broken workflows in Actions tab
+- **Faster Navigation**: Fewer workflow files to parse
+- **Clear Status**: Only functional workflows show status
+- **Simplified Debugging**: Fewer false positives to investigate
+
+### Maintenance Efficiency
+- **Less Clutter**: Easier to find relevant workflow runs
+- **Clear Intent**: Remaining workflows have obvious purposes
+- **Future Updates**: Easier to modify when only functional files present
+- **Documentation**: Clear history of what works vs what was broken
+
+### System Reliability
+- **No False Failures**: Broken workflows can't create noise
+- **Resource Conservation**: No wasted GitHub Actions minutes
+- **Clean State**: Repository reflects current functional architecture
+- **Audit Trail**: Git history preserves what was removed and why
+
+## Progress Tracking
+- [ ] Task 7.1: Legacy workflows documented
+- [ ] Task 7.2: Broken workflows removed (ci.yml, publish.yml, test-fix.yml)
+- [ ] Task 7.3: Cleanup changes committed and pushed
+- [ ] Task 7.4: Cleanup success verified in GitHub interface
+- [ ] Task 7.5: Remaining workflows tested and confirmed functional
+- [ ] All acceptance criteria met
+- [ ] Clean CI/CD infrastructure established
+- [ ] Ready for Phase 8: Documentation
+
+## Time Estimate
+**Total: 30 minutes**
+- Task 7.1: 10 minutes
+- Task 7.2: 15 minutes
+- Task 7.3: 5 minutes
+- Task 7.4: 5 minutes (includes some overlap)
+- Task 7.5: 5 minutes (includes some overlap)
+
+## Notes
+- This cleanup is safe because v0.1.0 was successfully deployed with new workflows
+- Only removing demonstrably broken workflows with clear failure patterns
+- Preserving all functional infrastructure and audit trails
+- Cleanup improves developer experience and reduces maintenance overhead
+- Future releases will benefit from clean, uncluttered CI/CD environment

plans/cicd-architecture-redesign/8-Documentation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
+# Phase 8: Documentation
+
+## Overview
+Update project documentation to reflect the new CI/CD architecture and create comprehensive release procedures for future SolarWindPy releases.
+
+## Objectives
+- Update CLAUDE.md with new workflow information
+- Create RELEASE.md with deployment procedures
+- Document version tag strategy
+- Establish release management best practices
+- Provide clear guidance for future releases
+
+## Tasks
+
+### Task 8.1: Update CLAUDE.md (15 minutes)
+**Purpose**: Reflect new CI/CD architecture in development documentation
+
+**Implementation Steps:**
+```bash
+# Open CLAUDE.md for editing
+code CLAUDE.md
+```
+
+**Required Updates:**
+
+**1. Git Workflow Section Updates:**
+- Replace references to broken ci.yml and publish.yml
+- Document new release-pipeline.yml and continuous-integration.yml
+- Update workflow trigger descriptions
+
+**2. New CI/CD Architecture Section:**
+```markdown
+### CI/CD Workflows (Updated for v0.1.0+)
+
+#### release-pipeline.yml
+- **Trigger**: Version tags (v*) on master branch
+- **Purpose**: Production and RC deployments
+- **Flow**: Tag Detection → Quality Checks → Release Branch → TestPyPI → [PyPI if not RC]
+- **Features**: Progressive deployment, RC detection, audit trail
+
+#### continuous-integration.yml
+- **Trigger**: Pull requests and non-master branches
+- **Purpose**: Lightweight PR validation
+- **Flow**: Quick tests with Python 3.12 on Ubuntu
+```
+
+**3. Version Tag Strategy:**
+```markdown
+### Release Tag Strategy
+- **Release Candidates** (`v*.*.*-rc*`): Deploy to TestPyPI only
+- **Production Releases** (`v*.*.*`): Full pipeline - TestPyPI → PyPI → Conda
+- **Examples**: v0.1.0-rc5 (TestPyPI only), v0.1.0 (full deployment)
+```
+
+**4. Update Quick Commands:**
+```markdown
+# Release Management:
+.github/workflows/release-pipeline.yml    # Production deployment
+.github/workflows/continuous-integration.yml # PR validation
+git tag v0.2.0-rc1; git push origin v0.2.0-rc1  # RC release
+git tag v0.2.0; git push origin v0.2.0           # Production release
+```
+
+### Task 8.2: Create RELEASE.md (10 minutes)
+**Purpose**: Comprehensive release procedures for maintainers
+
+**Implementation Steps:**
+```bash
+# Create new release documentation
+touch RELEASE.md
+```
+
+**RELEASE.md Content Structure:**
+```markdown
+# SolarWindPy Release Procedures
+
+## Overview
+This document describes the complete release process for SolarWindPy using the automated CI/CD pipeline established with v0.1.0.
+
+## Release Types
+
+### Release Candidates (Testing)
+**Pattern**: `v{major}.{minor}.{patch}-rc{number}`
+**Examples**: `v0.2.0-rc1`, `v1.0.0-rc5`
+**Deployment**: TestPyPI only
+**Purpose**: Safe testing before production
+
+### Production Releases (Stable)
+**Pattern**: `v{major}.{minor}.{patch}`
+**Examples**: `v0.2.0`, `v1.0.0`
+**Deployment**: TestPyPI → PyPI → GitHub Release → Conda-forge
+**Purpose**: Official stable releases
+
+## Release Process
+
+### Phase 1: Pre-Release Validation
+1. Ensure all tests pass on master
+2. Update version in setup.py/pyproject.toml
+3. Update CHANGELOG.md with release notes
+4. Commit version bump: `git commit -m "chore: bump version to v0.2.0"`
+
+### Phase 2: Release Candidate Testing
+1. Create RC tag: `git tag -a v0.2.0-rc1 -m "Release candidate for v0.2.0"`
+2. Push tag: `git push origin v0.2.0-rc1`
+3. Monitor workflow execution
+4. Test installation from TestPyPI
+5. Validate functionality
+
+### Phase 3: Production Release
+1. Create production tag: `git tag -a v0.2.0 -m "SolarWindPy v0.2.0 release"`
+2. Push tag: `git push origin v0.2.0`
+3. Monitor full pipeline deployment
+4. Validate PyPI deployment
+5. Confirm GitHub Release creation
+6. Monitor conda-forge update
+
+### Phase 4: Post-Release
+1. Announce release to community
+2. Update documentation links
+3. Plan next development cycle
+
+## Troubleshooting
+
+### Common Issues
+- **Workflow doesn't trigger**: Check tag format and repository permissions
+- **Quality checks fail**: Review test matrix and platform-specific issues
+- **PyPI upload fails**: Verify secrets configuration and version conflicts
+- **Conda-forge not updating**: Check issue creation and feedstock status
+
+### Emergency Procedures
+- **Bad release deployed**: Delete PyPI release, create patch version
+- **Workflow fails**: Use manual `twine upload` as fallback
+- **Critical bug discovered**: Immediately create patch release
+
+## Monitoring and Validation
+
+### Release Pipeline Monitoring
+1. GitHub Actions workflow execution
+2. TestPyPI deployment verification
+3. PyPI deployment confirmation
+4. GitHub Release creation
+5. Conda-forge issue tracking
+
+### Installation Testing
+```bash
+# Test PyPI installation
+pip install solarwindpy==x.y.z
+
+# Test conda installation (after conda-forge update)
+conda install -c conda-forge solarwindpy
+```
+```
+
+### Task 8.3: Document Integration Points (5 minutes)
+**Purpose**: Clarify how new workflows integrate with existing development
+
+**Add to CLAUDE.md Development Workflow Section:**
+```markdown
+### CI/CD Integration
+- **PRs**: Trigger continuous-integration.yml for validation
+- **Tags**: Trigger release-pipeline.yml for deployment
+- **Master**: Protected branch, requires PR approval
+- **Release Branches**: Auto-created by release-pipeline for audit trail
+
+### Branch Strategy
+- `master`: Stable development branch
+- `feature/*`: Development work (triggers CI on PRs)
+- `plan/*`: Planning and tracking branches
+- `release/*`: Auto-created for each version tag (audit trail)
+```
+
+## Documentation Validation
+
+### Task 8.4: Review and Consistency Check (5 minutes)
+**Validation Checklist:**
+
+**CLAUDE.md Updates:**
+- [ ] CI/CD section reflects new workflows
+- [ ] Version tag strategy documented clearly
+- [ ] Quick commands updated for new processes
+- [ ] Integration with existing development workflow explained
+
+**RELEASE.md Completeness:**
+- [ ] Complete release process documented
+- [ ] Both RC and production procedures covered
+- [ ] Troubleshooting section included
+- [ ] Monitoring and validation steps provided
+
+**Consistency Check:**
+- [ ] Version tag patterns match between documents
+- [ ] Workflow names consistent across documentation
+- [ ] Procedures align with actual CI/CD implementation
+- [ ] Examples use realistic version numbers
+
+## File Updates Summary
+
+### CLAUDE.md Changes
+- **Section**: CI/CD Workflows → Updated architecture description
+- **Section**: Git Workflow → Updated with new workflow files
+- **Section**: Quick Commands → Added release management commands
+- **Section**: Development Workflow → Added CI/CD integration points
+
+### New Files Created
+- **RELEASE.md**: Complete release management procedures
+- **Content**: Process documentation, troubleshooting, validation
+
+## Acceptance Criteria
+
+### Documentation Accuracy ✅
+- [ ] CLAUDE.md reflects new CI/CD architecture
+- [ ] Version tag strategy documented consistently
+- [ ] Workflow triggers and purposes clearly explained
+- [ ] Integration with development workflow clarified
+
+### Release Procedures ✅
+- [ ] RELEASE.md provides complete release guidance
+- [ ] Both RC and production processes documented
+- [ ] Troubleshooting and emergency procedures included
+- [ ] Monitoring and validation steps detailed
+
+### Consistency and Quality ✅
+- [ ] Documentation internally consistent
+- [ ] Matches actual CI/CD implementation
+- [ ] Uses clear, actionable language
+- [ ] Includes practical examples
+
+## Risk Mitigation
+
+### Documentation Accuracy
+- **Implementation Review**: Cross-check against actual workflow files
+- **Version Validation**: Ensure tag patterns match regex in workflows
+- **Process Testing**: Validate procedures against v0.1.0 release experience
+
+### Future Maintainability
+- **Clear Procedures**: Step-by-step instructions for complex processes
+- **Troubleshooting Guides**: Common issues and resolution steps
+- **Integration Documentation**: How CI/CD fits with development workflow
+
+## Progress Tracking
+- [ ] Task 8.1: CLAUDE.md updated with new CI/CD architecture
+- [ ] Task 8.2: RELEASE.md created with comprehensive procedures
+- [ ] Task 8.3: Integration points documented clearly
+- [ ] Task 8.4: Documentation reviewed for consistency and completeness
+- [ ] All acceptance criteria met
+- [ ] Documentation committed and pushed
+- [ ] Ready for Phase 9: Closeout
+
+## Time Estimate
+**Total: 30 minutes**
+- Task 8.1: 15 minutes
+- Task 8.2: 10 minutes
+- Task 8.3: 5 minutes
+- Task 8.4: 5 minutes (overlapping review)
+
+## Commit Message
+```bash
+git add CLAUDE.md RELEASE.md
+git commit -m "docs: update CI/CD documentation for new workflow architecture
+
+- CLAUDE.md: Updated with release-pipeline.yml and continuous-integration.yml
+- RELEASE.md: Added comprehensive release management procedures
+- Documented version tag strategy (RC vs production)
+- Included troubleshooting and monitoring guidance
+- Reflects successful v0.1.0 deployment architecture"
+git push origin master
+```
+
+## Future Maintenance
+
+### Regular Updates
+- **Workflow Changes**: Update documentation when CI/CD changes
+- **Process Improvements**: Incorporate lessons from future releases
+- **Tool Updates**: Reflect changes in GitHub Actions or PyPI processes
+
+### Version-Specific Updates
+- **Major Releases**: May require procedure updates
+- **Breaking Changes**: Update compatibility documentation
+- **New Features**: Reflect in release process as needed
+
+## Notes
+- Documentation reflects the successful v0.1.0 release process
+- Procedures are based on proven, working CI/CD implementation
+- Both developer (CLAUDE.md) and maintainer (RELEASE.md) perspectives covered
+- Future releases will benefit from clear, tested procedures
+- Documentation enables consistent, reliable release management