memorylink 1.0.0

package/PERPLEXITY_TELEMETRY_VALIDATION_RESPONSE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+# MemoryLink Telemetry System - Perplexity AI Validation Response
+
+**Date**: 2025-12-20  
+**Status**: ✅ **VALIDATED** - Design Approved  
+**Next Phase**: Local Testing → v1.6 Remote Implementation
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Validation Summary
+
+Perplexity AI has **validated** the telemetry system design. All aspects are approved:
+
+- ✅ **Privacy Design**: Correct and safe
+- ✅ **Data Model**: Appropriate and minimal
+- ✅ **Local Testing Approach**: Good approach (one command + test command)
+- ✅ **Security & Performance**: No critical issues identified
+
+---
+
+## 📋 Detailed Validation Feedback
+
+### 1. Privacy Design and Data Scope ✅
+
+**Approved**: The opt-in model with `enabled: false` by default matches privacy-first analytics best practices.
+
+**Key Points**:
+- Allowed fields are appropriately minimal
+- Explicit forbidden data list is correct
+- `TelemetryErrorKind` union type helps enforce guarantees at type level
+- No additional mandatory safeguards needed at design level
+
+**Action**: Keep constraints enforced in code reviews and tests.
+
+### 2. Error Categories and Event Model ✅
+
+**Approved**: High-level `TelemetryErrorKind` values are a good balance - useful for triage, too coarse to leak sensitive details.
+
+**Key Points**:
+- Current categories are safe and sufficient for v1.6
+- Can gradually refine/add categories later based on local telemetry patterns
+- Fewer categories are safer until real error distributions are observed
+
+**Action**: Keep current category model; expand only when patterns emerge.
+
+### 3. Local Testing Approach ✅
+
+**Approved**: Wiring one low-risk command (`stats`) for local testing is sensible.
+
+**Key Points**:
+- Staged rollout is appropriate
+- Hidden `telemetry-test` command is useful for validation
+- No need for different validation method at this point
+
+**Action**: Continue with current approach.
+
+### 4. Security and Performance Considerations ✅
+
+**Approved**: Async, non-throwing telemetry that never blocks CLI behavior matches safe monitoring guidance.
+
+**Key Points**:
+- Non-blocking design is correct
+- Keeping remote sending as stub for now is appropriate
+- When implementing HTTP POST in v1.6:
+  - Start with single-event sends
+  - 1-2 second timeouts
+  - Silent drop on failure (no retries initially)
+  - Persistent queues and batching can be added later if needed
+
+**Action**: Implement minimal remote sending first; add complexity only if needed.
+
+---
+
+## 🚀 Recommended Next Steps
+
+### Phase 1: Local Testing & Validation (Before v1.6)
+
+1. **Use Local Logging Yourself**
+   - Enable telemetry only on your own machines
+   - Exercise `stats` and `telemetry-test` commands
+   - Review `.memorylink/telemetry.log` regularly
+   - **Verify**: Ensure it never contains paths, code, or secrets
+
+2. **Add Simple Tests**
+   - Unit tests that build `TelemetryEvent` from simulated errors
+   - Assert that forbidden fields cannot be present
+   - Test that types prevent arbitrary strings/stack traces from entering `errorKind`
+
+3. **Document Findings**
+   - Note any patterns in local telemetry logs
+   - Identify if additional error categories are needed
+   - Document any edge cases discovered
+
+### Phase 2: v1.6 Remote Implementation
+
+**Minimal Remote Sending**:
+- HTTP POST to `telemetry.endpoint` with:
+  - Small JSON body (single event)
+  - Optional `apiKey` header
+  - Short timeout (1-2 seconds)
+  - No retry (silent drop on failure)
+- Still opt-in only
+- Clearly documented in `TELEMETRY.md`
+
+**Defer for Later**:
+- Persistent queues
+- Event batching
+- Retry logic with exponential backoff
+- (Add only if value is demonstrated)
+
+---
+
+## 📝 Action Items
+
+### Immediate (Before v1.6)
+- [ ] Enable telemetry locally and test with `stats` command
+- [ ] Use `telemetry-test` command to generate sample events
+- [ ] Manually review `.memorylink/telemetry.log` for privacy compliance
+- [ ] Write unit tests for `TelemetryEvent` construction
+- [ ] Test that forbidden fields cannot be added
+
+### v1.6 Implementation
+- [ ] Implement minimal HTTP POST in `sendTelemetryEvent()`
+- [ ] Add timeout handling (1-2 seconds)
+- [ ] Add optional `apiKey` header support
+- [ ] Ensure silent failure (no retries initially)
+- [ ] Update `TELEMETRY.md` with remote sending details
+- [ ] Test remote sending with test endpoint
+
+### Future (If Needed)
+- [ ] Add persistent queue if endpoint downtime is an issue
+- [ ] Add event batching if volume becomes significant
+- [ ] Add retry logic if transient failures are common
+- [ ] Expand error categories based on real-world patterns
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Validation Conclusion
+
+**Status**: Design is **validated and approved** for implementation.
+
+**Key Takeaways**:
+1. Privacy design is correct and safe - no changes needed
+2. Data model is appropriate and minimal - keep it simple
+3. Local testing approach is good - continue as planned
+4. Security/performance considerations are addressed - proceed with confidence
+
+**Next Action**: Begin Phase 1 (Local Testing & Validation) before implementing remote sending in v1.6.
+
+---
+
+**Validated by**: Perplexity AI  
+**Date**: 2025-12-20  
+**Next Review**: After local testing phase, before v1.6 remote implementation
+

package/PERPLEXITY_USER_GUIDE_VALIDATION.md

@@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
+# MemoryLink v1.0.0 User Guide - Perplexity AI Validation Request
+
+**Date**: 2025-12-20  
+**Version**: v1.0.0  
+**Status**: User Guide Complete - Requesting Validation
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 What We Completed
+
+We've created a comprehensive **User Guide** (`USER_GUIDE.md`) that explains how to use MemoryLink in real life and handle common problems, without exposing any internal engine details.
+
+---
+
+## ✅ User Guide Created
+
+### `USER_GUIDE.md` (Complete)
+
+**Purpose**: Practical guide for daily use and troubleshooting
+
+**Sections Included:**
+
+1. **What You Can Do with MemoryLink**
+   - User-friendly explanation of capabilities
+   - No technical jargon
+   - Focus on benefits
+
+2. **Quick Daily Workflow (Happy Path)**
+   - Step-by-step before/after workflow
+   - Clear commands with explanations
+   - What each step means for the user
+
+3. **How to Read Buddy-Check Results**
+   - GREEN/YELLOW/RED status explanations
+   - What each color means
+   - 2-3 simple actions for each status
+
+4. **Common Problems and How to Handle Them**
+   - 7 common problems with solutions:
+     - Buddy-Check returns RED
+     - Lock is already held
+     - Checkpoint diff is too big
+     - CI fails on RED
+     - Can't find checkpoint
+     - Command not found
+     - Not initialized error
+   - Troubleshooting steps for each
+
+5. **Best Practices for Safe Use**
+   - 6 best practices with examples:
+     - Always create checkpoints before large changes
+     - Always use locks when multiple agents work
+     - Configure protected files
+     - Run Buddy-Check in CI
+     - Monitor stats regularly
+     - Review Buddy-Check reports
+
+6. **When to Ask for Help / Open an Issue**
+   - When to open an issue
+   - What to include (and what NOT to include)
+   - Where to get help
+
+7. **Quick Reference**
+   - Essential commands
+   - Status meanings
+   - Common workflows
+
+---
+
+## 🔒 Protection of Internal Details
+
+### Rules Applied
+
+Following strict guidelines to protect core engine:
+
+1. **Do NOT describe internal implementation:**
+   - ❌ No internal algorithms
+   - ❌ No patterns or engine logic
+   - ❌ No regex or formulas
+   - ❌ No internal file names
+   - ❌ No detection method details
+
+2. **Only describe user-facing things:**
+   - ✅ Commands and how to use them
+   - ✅ Typical workflows
+   - ✅ What users should do
+   - ✅ How to handle problems
+   - ✅ Troubleshooting steps
+
+### Verification
+
+**Checked for:**
+- ✅ No mention of internal algorithms (Luhn, scoring, etc.)
+- ✅ No exact pattern lists or regex
+- ✅ No internal file references (`src/commands/doctor.ts`, etc.)
+- ✅ No function names (`scoreMemoryEntry`, etc.)
+- ✅ No implementation approaches
+- ✅ Only user-facing commands and workflows
+
+**Content Focus:**
+- ✅ How to use commands
+- ✅ What commands do (high-level)
+- ✅ How to interpret results
+- ✅ How to solve problems
+- ✅ Best practices
+
+---
+
+## 📋 Content Quality
+
+### User-Focused Language
+
+- **Simple explanations**: "Protect important files when using AI"
+- **Clear workflows**: Step-by-step before/after examples
+- **Practical examples**: Real command sequences
+- **Troubleshooting**: Common problems with solutions
+
+### Structure
+
+- **Scannable**: Clear headers, bullets, code blocks
+- **Actionable**: Specific steps for each scenario
+- **Complete**: Covers daily workflow, problems, and best practices
+- **Helpful**: Quick reference section for common tasks
+
+### Examples Included
+
+- Daily workflow (before/after AI work)
+- Status interpretation (GREEN/YELLOW/RED)
+- Problem solving (7 common issues)
+- Best practices (6 practices with examples)
+- Quick reference (essential commands)
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Documentation Status
+
+### Complete Documentation Set
+
+1. ✅ **README.md** - First impression, quickstart, core features
+2. ✅ **SECURITY_MODEL.md** - Safety & privacy, limits, how to use safely
+3. ✅ **ROADMAP_v1.6.md** - Future enhancements roadmap
+4. ✅ **USER_GUIDE.md** - Daily workflow and troubleshooting (NEW)
+
+### Linked from README
+
+The User Guide is now linked from README.md in the Documentation section:
+- **`USER_GUIDE.md`**: How to use MemoryLink in daily workflow and handle common problems
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 What Users Get
+
+### From USER_GUIDE.md
+
+Users can now:
+- ✅ Understand how to use MemoryLink in daily workflow
+- ✅ Know what to do before and after AI work
+- ✅ Interpret Buddy-Check results (GREEN/YELLOW/RED)
+- ✅ Solve common problems themselves
+- ✅ Follow best practices for safe use
+- ✅ Know when and how to ask for help
+
+### Without Exposing Internal Details
+
+Users do NOT see:
+- ❌ Internal algorithms or formulas
+- ❌ Exact patterns or regex
+- ❌ Implementation file/function references
+- ❌ Detection method details
+- ❌ Engine logic
+
+---
+
+## ❓ Questions for Perplexity AI
+
+1. **User Guide Completeness:**
+   - Is the User Guide comprehensive enough for daily use?
+   - Are there any common scenarios or problems missing?
+   - Is the troubleshooting section sufficient?
+
+2. **Clarity & Usability:**
+   - Is the language clear and user-friendly?
+   - Are the workflows easy to follow?
+   - Are the examples helpful?
+
+3. **Protection of Internal Details:**
+   - Have we successfully protected internal implementation?
+   - Are there any remaining internal details that should be removed?
+   - Is the balance between user information and protection appropriate?
+
+4. **Documentation Completeness:**
+   - Is the documentation set (README, SECURITY_MODEL, ROADMAP, USER_GUIDE) complete for v1.0.0 launch?
+   - Should we create GETTING_STARTED.md or FEATURES.md?
+   - Are there any other documents needed?
+
+5. **Launch Readiness:**
+   - Are these documents ready for public launch?
+   - Should we proceed with launch preparation (tagging, GitHub release, npm publish)?
+   - Are there any legal or compliance considerations?
+
+6. **Next Steps:**
+   - What should be the next step after documentation validation?
+   - Should we create additional guides (GETTING_STARTED.md, FEATURES.md)?
+   - Should we proceed with launch?
+
+---
+
+## 📊 Summary
+
+**What was completed:**
+- User Guide created (`USER_GUIDE.md`)
+- Daily workflow documented (before/after AI work)
+- Buddy-Check results explained (GREEN/YELLOW/RED)
+- Common problems solved (7 troubleshooting scenarios)
+- Best practices documented (6 practices)
+- Quick reference provided
+- Linked from README.md
+
+**Protection achieved:**
+- No internal algorithms or formulas
+- No patterns or engine logic
+- No implementation details
+- Only user-facing commands and workflows
+
+**User value:**
+- Clear daily workflow
+- Problem-solving guidance
+- Best practices
+- Quick reference
+
+---
+
+**Status**: User Guide complete and protected. Ready for validation and next steps.
+
+**Request**: Please validate the User Guide approach, protection of internal details, completeness for daily use, and provide guidance on next steps for v1.0.0 launch.
+