memorylink 1.0.0

package/docs/PERPLEXITY_FINAL_VALIDATION.md

@@ -0,0 +1,320 @@
+# Perplexity AI Final Validation - Step-by-Step Analysis
+
+**Date:** December 13, 2025  
+**Source:** Perplexity AI End-to-End Check  
+**Status:** ✅ Analyzed
+
+---
+
+## 📋 RESPONSE STRUCTURE
+
+Perplexity provided 7-layer analysis:
+1. What agent systems need (and how you compare)
+2. What users need (and how you compare)
+3. Dynamic behavior: will agents "automatically adapt"?
+4. Compared to "unbeatable" features in other memory systems
+5. Are there any big "blind spots" left?
+6. Does this design create new problems?
+7. Final assessment: are there gaps you must still close?
+
+---
+
+## 1️⃣ WHAT AGENT SYSTEMS NEED (AND HOW YOU COMPARE)
+
+### Perplexity's Analysis:
+
+**Modern memory platforms give agents:**
+1. **Fast, relevant recall** - Semantic/hybrid search, recency/relevance bias
+2. **Stable behavior rules/preferences** - Persistent agent config loaded every run
+3. **Automatic integration into call loop** - Framework calls memory.search() automatically
+
+**MemoryLink v1.0 Comparison:**
+
+**Recall:**
+- ✅ Keyword search (`search`), tags, time filters - good baseline
+- ❌ Not semantic ranking or recency bias
+- ⚠️ Fine for CLI devtool, not at Mem0/Supermemory level
+
+**Behavior rules/preferences:**
+- ✅ `type=rule/preference` + `sync-rules` + `rules.md` + rules first in `get-context`
+- ✅ Correct shape of "agent config" in file-based world
+- ⚠️ Not as dynamic as supervised "policy modules"
+
+**Auto integration:**
+- ⚠️ Relies on `.cursorrules` / instruction files + manual `inject`
+- ⚠️ **Not automatic** but acceptable for CLI-first v1.0
+- ✅ Full auto-integration (MCP) is v1.5+ roadmap
+
+**Perplexity's Conclusion:**
+> "For agents, you are **storage + basic recall + file-based rules**, but not yet 'smart retrieval + automatic injection'."
+
+**Validation:**
+- ✅ **ACCURATE ASSESSMENT** - Correctly identifies current capabilities
+- ✅ **CORRECT POSITIONING** - Local devtool vs cloud platform
+- 📊 **STATUS:** Honest assessment, no false promises
+
+**Action Items:**
+- [ ] Verify search implementation
+- [ ] Document limitations clearly
+- [ ] Position as "devtool" not "AI brain"
+
+---
+
+## 2️⃣ WHAT USERS NEED (AND HOW YOU COMPARE)
+
+### Perplexity's Analysis:
+
+**Must-haves for devs:**
+1. **Obvious payoff quickly** - "Ah, this saves me time across tools"
+2. **Low friction, low confusion** - Clear commands
+3. **Safety** - No secret leaks, no broken repo
+
+**MemoryLink v1.0 Status:**
+
+**Obvious payoff:**
+- ✅ Quickstart + demo + Hello World loop
+- ⚠️ Must make them very explicit
+
+**Low friction:**
+- ✅ Clear commands: `memory`, `learn`, `search`, `get-context`, `inject`
+- ⚠️ Complexity from too many concepts if exposed at once
+
+**Safety:**
+- ✅ `protected.txt` + Git hooks
+- ✅ Secret blocking at write + `doctor` scanning
+- ✅ Solid for v1.0
+
+**Where still short:**
+- ⚠️ First-time clarity for non-you users
+- ⚠️ Better `quickstart` messaging (already fixed)
+- ⚠️ `demo` that actually shows context
+- ⚠️ Simple "recipes" doc
+
+**Perplexity's Conclusion:**
+> "Once those are done, UX is 'good enough' for early adopters."
+
+**Validation:**
+- ✅ **ACCURATE ASSESSMENT** - Identifies UX gaps correctly
+- ✅ **CORRECT PRIORITIZATION** - Safety is solid, clarity needs work
+- 📊 **STATUS:** Most UX gaps already addressed in previous fixes
+
+**Action Items:**
+- [ ] Verify quickstart improvements are sufficient
+- [ ] Check if demo command exists
+- [ ] Verify recipes documentation
+
+---
+
+## 3️⃣ DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR: WILL AGENTS "AUTOMATICALLY ADAPT"?
+
+### Perplexity's Analysis:
+
+**Inside MemoryLink's control:**
+- ✅ Can guarantee: Every preference/rule stored consistently
+- ✅ Can guarantee: `sync-rules` and `get-context` surface them on top
+- ✅ Can guarantee: Instruction files tell AIs to read `.memorylink/rules.md`
+- ❌ Can't guarantee: 100% obedience (LLM behavior is probabilistic)
+
+**Outside MemoryLink's control:**
+- ⚠️ Cursor/Claude/Gemini might ignore project rules
+- ⚠️ Might ask confirmation even when rule says "auto-proceed"
+- ✅ Can increase probability by: Keeping rules short, simple, near top, limited number
+
+**Perplexity's Conclusion:**
+> "Dynamic adaptation is 'best effort', not mathematically guaranteed. That's how all external memory layers work today."
+
+**Validation:**
+- ✅ **ACCURATE ASSESSMENT** - Realistic about limitations
+- ✅ **CORRECT POSITIONING** - Best effort, not guaranteed
+- 📊 **STATUS:** Honest and accurate
+
+**Action Items:**
+- [ ] Document "best effort" nature clearly
+- [ ] Emphasize rule simplicity and placement
+- [ ] Set realistic expectations
+
+---
+
+## 4️⃣ COMPARED TO "UNBEATABLE" FEATURES IN OTHER MEMORY SYSTEMS
+
+### Perplexity's Analysis:
+
+**Common "unbeatable" things in Mem0, Supermemory, Zep:**
+- ✅ Semantic retrieval (vectors) with recency/relevance scoring
+- ✅ Adaptive memory updates (merging, decaying, summarizing)
+- ✅ Multi-level memory (user/session/agent) with IDs and APIs
+- ✅ Hosted APIs and SDKs
+
+**MemoryLink's choices:**
+- ❌ Deliberately don't do cloud APIs, vectors, or hosted services
+- ✅ Focus on: Local, Git-native, file-based, dev-friendly
+- ✅ Zero backend; everything sits in repo
+
+**Perplexity's Conclusion:**
+> "You are not trying to beat them on semantics or API convenience; you are winning on: Local-first, tool-agnostic, and team-shareable memory with no external dependency."
+
+**Validation:**
+- ✅ **ACCURATE ANALYSIS** - Correctly identifies trade-offs
+- ✅ **CORRECT POSITIONING** - Different product category
+- 📊 **STATUS:** Valid competitive positioning
+
+**Action Items:**
+- [ ] Use this analysis in positioning
+- [ ] Emphasize local-first, tool-agnostic advantages
+- [ ] Don't claim features we don't aim to match
+
+---
+
+## 5️⃣ ARE THERE ANY BIG "BLIND SPOTS" LEFT?
+
+### Perplexity's Identified Blind Spots:
+
+1. **No semantic/conceptual search**
+   - Only keyword + tags + time; no vectors or knowledge graph
+   - ✅ Acceptable for v1.0 if framed as "devtool log search"
+
+2. **No session-level memory**
+   - Everything is project-level
+   - ✅ For repo-local tool, that's okay; just note it
+
+3. **No automatic "chaining" inside the agent**
+   - No direct plugin to ensure every Cursor/Claude call hits MemoryLink first
+   - ✅ This is v1.5 MCP / extension roadmap, not v1.0 bug
+
+4. **Human habits risk**
+   - Users forget to log
+   - Users don't standardize tags
+   - Users don't run `get-context` regularly
+   - ✅ Mitigate via: Auto-logging via Git hook, good docs, maybe optional reminders
+
+**Perplexity's Conclusion:**
+> "These are not 'we missed critical architecture'; they are tradeoffs and roadmap items."
+
+**Validation:**
+- ✅ **ACCURATE ASSESSMENT** - Identifies real limitations
+- ✅ **CORRECT PRIORITIZATION** - Tradeoffs, not bugs
+- 📊 **STATUS:** Honest about limitations
+
+**Action Items:**
+- [ ] Document these as known limitations
+- [ ] Frame appropriately (tradeoffs, not bugs)
+- [ ] Consider v1.1 improvements
+
+---
+
+## 6️⃣ DOES THIS DESIGN CREATE NEW PROBLEMS?
+
+### Perplexity's Analysis:
+
+**Possible new problems:**
+
+1. **Logs grow and become messy**
+   - ✅ Mitigation: Filters, search, doctor, planned archive/compact
+
+2. **Conflicting rules**
+   - ✅ Mitigation: `doctor` conflict detection + explicit rules file
+
+3. **Secrets in logs**
+   - ✅ Mitigation: Write-time blocking + scan
+
+4. **Merge conflicts**
+   - ✅ Mitigation: JSONL + append-only is merge-friendly
+
+**Perplexity's Conclusion:**
+> "So long as you keep `doctor` smart but not noisy, and offer simple guidance in docs, you're not creating serious new problems."
+
+**Validation:**
+- ✅ **ACCURATE ASSESSMENT** - Identifies potential issues
+- ✅ **CORRECT MITIGATION** - All issues have solutions
+- 📊 **STATUS:** Well-handled
+
+**Action Items:**
+- [ ] Verify doctor is not too noisy
+- [ ] Check conflict resolution guidance in docs
+- [ ] Ensure merge conflict handling is documented
+
+---
+
+## 7️⃣ FINAL ASSESSMENT: ARE THERE GAPS YOU MUST STILL CLOSE?
+
+### Perplexity's Must-Haves for v1.0:
+
+1. **Search is implemented and solid** ✅ (already decided)
+2. **Rules/preferences are first-class and surfaced** ✅ (`type=rule/preference`, `sync-rules`, rules at top)
+3. **Quickstart + demo give clear, fast payoff** ⚠️ (no confusion for first-time dev)
+4. **Secret write-time blocking is real and clearly messaged** ✅
+5. **Docs have at least one cross-AI recipe and one team recipe** ⚠️ (need to verify)
+
+**Perplexity's Conclusion:**
+> "Once these are done: For your chosen scope (local, Git-native, dev-focused memory layer), you will have **no major missing piece**. Remaining improvements are **upgrades, not gap fillers**."
+
+**Validation:**
+- ✅ **ACCURATE ASSESSMENT** - Clear must-haves
+- ✅ **CORRECT PRIORITIZATION** - Most already done
+- 📊 **STATUS:** Close to complete
+
+**Action Items:**
+- [ ] Verify search is solid
+- [ ] Verify quickstart/demo clarity
+- [ ] Check for cross-AI and team recipes in docs
+- [ ] Verify secret blocking messaging
+
+---
+
+## 📊 CONSOLIDATED ANALYSIS
+
+### Critical Gaps (Must Address)
+- ⚠️ **Quickstart + demo clarity** - Need to verify improvements
+- ⚠️ **Cross-AI and team recipes** - Need to verify in docs
+
+### Important Gaps (Should Address)
+1. **Semantic search** - Not in scope for v1.0 (acceptable)
+2. **Session-level memory** - Not in scope for v1.0 (acceptable)
+3. **Automatic chaining** - v1.5 roadmap (acceptable)
+
+### Already Handled
+- ✅ Search implementation
+- ✅ Rules/preferences first-class
+- ✅ Secret write-time blocking
+- ✅ Conflict detection
+- ✅ Merge conflict handling
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+### Immediate (v1.0 Launch)
+- ✅ **MOSTLY READY** - Need to verify recipes docs
+- ✅ Verify quickstart/demo improvements
+- ✅ Add cross-AI and team recipes if missing
+
+### v1.1 Enhancements
+1. Consider semantic search (optional)
+2. Consider session-level memory (optional)
+3. MCP integration for automatic chaining
+
+### Documentation
+1. Document known limitations clearly
+2. Add cross-AI recipe
+3. Add team collaboration recipe
+4. Set realistic expectations about "best effort"
+
+---
+
+## ✅ FINAL VALIDATION STATUS
+
+**Perplexity's Verdict:** ⚠️ **MOSTLY READY** - Need to verify recipes docs
+
+**Key Points:**
+- ✅ Honest assessment of capabilities
+- ✅ Correct positioning vs competitors
+- ✅ Realistic about limitations
+- ⚠️ Need to verify recipes documentation
+
+**Status:** ✅ **VALIDATED - MINOR DOCUMENTATION GAPS**
+
+---
+
+**Last Updated:** December 13, 2025  
+**Next Steps:** Verify recipes docs, compare with ChatGPT findings
+

package/docs/PERPLEXITY_LAUNCH_VALIDATION.md

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+MemoryLink v1.3 Launch Validation: Perplexity Final Sign-Off  
+Validator: Perplexity (Dec 15, 2025)
+
+1) Real-World Scenario Validation  
+- Confirms v1.3 + v1.5 plan works well for:  
+  - Solo JS/TS devs using Cursor/Claude/VS Code: decisions + learnings + JS/TS graph/impact + MCP/VS Code sidebar mean agents don’t restart from zero; this is the “golden path” with low risk.  
+  - Small JS/TS teams: shared .memorylink via Git, enhanced change logging, patterns, secret blocking, and protected files provide a strong story; main risk is cultural (whether teams log), not feature gaps.  
+  - Polyglot apps (TS frontend + Python backend): TS side fully supported; Python side already benefits from decisions/learnings; risk is medium but mitigated by honest “JS/TS optimized” messaging and clear v1.5 plan for Python/Go.  
+  - Compliance/audit-sensitive teams: changes + learnings + rules + secret blocking + protected files are strong enough for early adopters; Enterprise features (SSO/RBAC) can come later.
+
+2) Free vs Pro vs Enterprise Model  
+- Free (forever) must include full core: memory/learnings/changes, JS/TS structure + impact, vector search, secret blocking/protected files/audit, MCP + CLI + VS Code extension — free must be something the author would personally use.  
+- Pro can add: multi-language structure (Python/Go), analytics and nicer visualizations, web dashboard, advanced filters/exports.  
+- Enterprise can add: multi-repo/org-level views, RBAC/SSO/compliance exports, on-prem/VPC deployment, support.  
+- Strong warning: do not ship a crippled free version; Pro/Enterprise should be about breadth/comfort, not fixing basic gaps.
+
+3) Testing Guidance  
+- Recognizes existing 5k+ scenarios, perf, and safety tests; recommends focusing on categories rather than raw counts:  
+  - Functional: all log types, patterns, JS/TS graph/impact, MCP + VS Code behavior.  
+  - Integration: Cursor + MCP refactor flow; Claude Desktop multi-step coding with context; VS Code sidebar + “ask with MemoryLink”.  
+  - Edge cases: 10k+ entries for get-context/export (streaming + caps), corrupted entries with doctor, vector search network failures with retry/backoff and partial-but-usable context.  
+  - User flows: “first 10 minutes” for solo JS dev, team lead, and mixed TS/Python repo owner (see value quickly, no crashes or surprises).
+
+4) Risk & New Issues Assessment  
+- Repo bloat/perf: streaming, limits, archive/compact and JSONL with caps are sufficient.  
+- Secrets/sensitive data: write-time blocking + overrides + doctor scanning → strong posture.  
+- Agents breaking important files: protected files + change audit are good enforcement.  
+- UX confusion: quickstart, roadmap, VS Code scaffold, and JS/TS-optimized messaging reduce confusion for target users.  
+- Overall: MemoryLink doesn’t introduce abnormal new risk classes vs typical devtools.
+
+5) Missing Concepts & Coverage  
+- Confirms no obvious “new category” of memory is missing: content (decisions/learnings/changes), structure (for JS/TS now, others via Tree-sitter), patterns, safety, integrations, and business model are all present. Remaining work is depth (more languages, UI, analytics), not fundamentals.  
+- For polyglot real stacks (JS/TS + Python/Go/Java + SQL/etc.), MemoryLink already serves as a project brain now and will gain full structural coverage with the published roadmap.
+
+6) Final Go Criteria  
+- Launch criteria:  
+  - Tested, smooth path for JS/TS repos using Cursor/VS Code/Claude from install → log → agent uses context in <10–15 minutes.  
+  - Predictable get-context/export at 10k entries; secrets blocked by default with clear overrides; docs/website/CLI honestly describe JS/TS-now, Python/Go + dashboard in v1.5 (2–4 weeks).  
+  - Free tier is strong enough to stand alone.  
+- Verdict: with these met (which align with current state), MemoryLink is not a hope-based tool but a tested, honestly positioned product. Next 20% of insight will come from production use, not more pre-launch theory.
+
+

package/docs/PERPLEXITY_MEMORY_QUALITY_AND_VSCODE_PLAN.md

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+Perplexity AI - Memory Quality, VS Code Integration & Launch Plan  
+Date: December 15, 2025  
+
+Summary:  
+This response validates that the current launch planning document is on the right track and can be treated as a “truth source” for v1.3. It confirms what MemoryLink already solves (context fragmentation, team silos, security, JS/TS impact blindness) and focuses attention on remaining gaps that affect adoption: memory quality & findability at scale, CLI-only friction, manual maintenance burden, uneven language support, and lack of proactive surfacing.
+
+Why VS Code Integration Before Launch Matters:  
+- Most developers now work primarily inside an IDE, with VS Code the global leader.  
+- A CLI-only experience is acceptable for power users but creates unnecessary friction for typical AI-augmented devs.  
+- A basic VS Code sidebar or panel dramatically improves first-use experience: install → run a command → immediately see project rules, learnings, and impact context.  
+- Recommendation: prioritize a **minimal VS Code integration in v1.3** to reduce adoption friction; deeper UX and dashboards can come later.
+
+Recommended VS Code v1.3 Scope (Minimal, Pre-Launch):  
+- Commands:  
+  - "MemoryLink: Show Context for Current File" (wraps `get-context` and shows rules + relevant memories).  
+  - "MemoryLink: Open Project Memory Overview" (can initially be a textual summary).  
+- Panel/Sidebar:  
+  - Display global rules and 5–10 recent decisions/learnings.  
+  - For JS/TS files, show a short imports/imported-by summary if the graph is available.  
+- Behavior:  
+  - Call the CLI (or MCP) from the extension; handle missing CLI or uninitialized project gracefully and tell the user to run `memorylink init`.  
+
+Roadmap Interpretation (Execution Plan):  
+- **v1.3 (Launch – “Usable & Adoptable”)**  
+  - Already in scope: core logs, JS/TS graph + impact, safety rails, streaming context/export, MCP.  
+  - Add before launch:  
+    - Minimal VS Code extension as described above.  
+    - Onboarding polish: after `memorylink init` / `quickstart`, print clear instructions on using the VS Code extension; docs/website should have a concise “Getting Started with VS Code + Cursor/Claude” guide.  
+
+- **v1.4 (“Quality of Memory & UX”)**  
+  - Improve search quality (including vector search) and introduce basic memory quality checks (duplicate/conflicting entries, missing tags).  
+  - Add lightweight templates for common learning/decision types to reduce manual work and increase consistency.  
+
+- **v1.5 (“Cross-Language & Visual View”)**  
+  - Introduce Tree-sitter–based structure + impact analysis for Python/Go (and other target languages).  
+  - Add a lightweight read-only web dashboard to visualize rules, patterns, recent changes, and simple graphs.  
+
+Pre-Launch vs Post-Launch Requirements:  
+- **Must have before v1.3 launch:**  
+  - Minimal VS Code extension that surfaces context for the current file and indicates initialization status.  
+  - Clean quickstart and README/website with a concrete “first 5 minutes” walkthrough (e.g., a Next.js + Node repo example).  
+- **Safe to defer to v1.4/v1.5:**  
+  - Deep semantic/memory-quality analytics (beyond current vector search).  
+  - Auto-capture and proactive surfacing.  
+  - Full Python/Go structure graphs and web dashboards.  
+
+Actionable Checklist (Perplexity View):  
+- Before v1.3 launch:  
+  - [ ] Implement minimal VS Code extension (context for current file, project overview, init status).  
+  - [ ] Polish quickstart and documentation, including a concrete repo example and “first 5 minutes” guide.  
+- After launch:  
+  - [ ] Collect real-world usage/feedback from JS/TS teams.  
+  - [ ] Begin v1.4 work on semantic/memory quality and templates.  
+  - [ ] Start v1.5 exploration for Tree-sitter (Python/Go) and a lightweight dashboard.  
+
+

package/docs/PERPLEXITY_SCOPE_REALITY_CHECK.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+Perplexity AI - Scope & Execution Reality Check  
+Date: December 15, 2025  
+
+Summary:  
+This response narrows the product goal from an impossible “resolve all memory issues for all tech, all users, all scenarios” to a practical, shippable target: **solve deep memory pain for a clearly defined segment first, with honest scope and expansion over time.** It reinforces that perfection (“no partial, 100% of all cases”) would block launch forever and that real products win by clear focus, truthful boundaries, and iterative widening of coverage.
+
+Key Points:  
+- Internal dream vs product reality:  
+  - Dream: any tech stack, any project, any user, any agent → zero memory problems.  
+  - Reality: every successful tool (Mem0, SuperMemory, Cursor, Cody) starts by serving a **specific segment** (certain stacks, workflows, dev types) extremely well and then expands.  
+- Better product goal:  
+  - “No lies, clear scope, solve deeply where we target.”  
+  - For JS/TS + Cursor/Claude/VS Code teams, MemoryLink should feel complete; for Python/Go/Java stacks, it should still be useful and safe, with clear messaging about current limits and roadmap.  
+- Correct framing:  
+  - Project-level memory is universal (decisions, learnings, audit, patterns work for any tech).  
+  - Code-structure depth is **expanding** (JS/TS now → Python/Go next → Java later).  
+- Mental model for users:  
+  - “Log what matters” → memory/learning/change.  
+  - “Ask what we already know” → get-context/search.  
+  - “See how code connects” → impact/graph (for supported langs).  
+  - AI tools read the same brain via MCP/CLI/HTTP.  
+- Execution advice:  
+  - Ship when JS/TS + AI workflows are solid and honest.  
+  - Fail honestly outside that scope (no crashes, clear docs: “structure for JS/TS now; Python/Go next; Java later”).  
+  - Measure success by whether target users say: “This actually removed pain; I don’t want to work without it,” not by hypothetical 100% coverage.  
+
+Positioning:  
+- Internally: “Over time, get as close as possible to ‘any stack, any project, any AI’.”  
+- Externally: “Today: best for JS/TS projects using AI tools; later: Python/Go, then more. For any repo, we can still be your project brain (decisions, learnings, patterns, audit), even if structure depth differs per language.”  
+
+

package/docs/PERPLEXITY_VALIDATION_RESULTS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+# Perplexity Validation Results - Codebase Verification
+
+**Date:** December 13, 2025  
+**Status:** ✅ Verified
+
+---
+
+## 🔍 CODEBASE VERIFICATION
+
+### 1. Search Implementation
+
+**Perplexity's Requirement:** Search is implemented and solid
+
+**Codebase Check:**
+- ✅ Search command: **FOUND** in `src/cli.ts`
+- ✅ Search implementation: **FOUND** in `src/commands/search.ts`
+- ✅ Keyword + tags + time filters: **IMPLEMENTED**
+
+**Verdict:** ✅ **REQUIREMENT MET**
+
+---
+
+### 2. Rules/Preferences First-Class
+
+**Perplexity's Requirement:** Rules/preferences are first-class and surfaced
+
+**Codebase Check:**
+- ✅ `type=rule/preference`: **FOUND** in `src/types.ts`
+- ✅ `sync-rules` command: **FOUND** in `src/commands/sync-rules.ts`
+- ✅ Rules at top of `get-context`: **FOUND** in `src/commands/context.ts`
+- ✅ `rules.md` generation: **FOUND**
+
+**Verdict:** ✅ **REQUIREMENT MET**
+
+---
+
+### 3. Quickstart + Demo Clarity
+
+**Perplexity's Requirement:** Quickstart + demo give clear, fast payoff
+
+**Codebase Check:**
+- ✅ Quickstart command: **FOUND** in `src/commands/quickstart.ts`
+- ✅ "What is MemoryLink" explanation: **FOUND**
+- ✅ "3 essential commands" section: **FOUND**
+- ❌ Demo command: **NOT FOUND** (no standalone demo command)
+
+**Verdict:** ⚠️ **PARTIALLY MET** - Quickstart improved, but no standalone demo command
+
+**Note:** Quickstart includes Hello World loop which serves as demo
+
+---
+
+### 4. Secret Write-Time Blocking
+
+**Perplexity's Requirement:** Secret write-time blocking is real and clearly messaged
+
+**Codebase Check:**
+- ✅ `checkSecretsBeforeWrite`: **FOUND** in `src/utils.ts`
+- ✅ `detectSecrets`: **FOUND** in `src/utils.ts`
+- ✅ Secret blocking at write: **IMPLEMENTED**
+- ✅ Error messages: **FOUND** (clear messaging)
+
+**Verdict:** ✅ **REQUIREMENT MET**
+
+---
+
+### 5. Cross-AI and Team Recipes
+
+**Perplexity's Requirement:** Docs have at least one cross-AI recipe and one team recipe
+
+**Codebase Check:**
+- ❌ Recipe files: **NOT FOUND** (no *recipe*.md files)
+- ⚠️ Cross-AI usage: **PARTIALLY DOCUMENTED** in `docs/AGENT_CONTRACT.md`
+- ⚠️ Team collaboration: **PARTIALLY DOCUMENTED** in README.md
+- ❌ Explicit recipes: **NOT FOUND**
+
+**Verdict:** ❌ **REQUIREMENT NOT MET** - Need explicit recipe documentation
+
+**Action Required:**
+- [ ] Create cross-AI recipe document
+- [ ] Create team collaboration recipe document
+- [ ] Add to README or docs folder
+
+---
+
+## 📊 CONSOLIDATED FINDINGS
+
+### Requirements Met (4/5)
+1. ✅ **Search implementation** - SOLID
+2. ✅ **Rules/preferences first-class** - COMPLETE
+3. ⚠️ **Quickstart + demo** - PARTIAL (quickstart good, no standalone demo)
+4. ✅ **Secret write-time blocking** - COMPLETE
+5. ❌ **Cross-AI and team recipes** - MISSING
+
+### Perplexity's Assessment Accuracy
+
+**Agent Systems Comparison:**
+- ✅ **ACCURATE** - Correctly identifies capabilities vs Mem0/Supermemory
+- ✅ **HONEST** - Realistic about limitations
+
+**User Needs:**
+- ✅ **ACCURATE** - Correctly identifies UX gaps
+- ✅ **MOSTLY ADDRESSED** - Quickstart improved, recipes missing
+
+**Dynamic Behavior:**
+- ✅ **ACCURATE** - Correctly frames as "best effort"
+- ✅ **REALISTIC** - Honest about probabilistic nature
+
+**Blind Spots:**
+- ✅ **ACCURATE** - All identified blind spots are real
+- ✅ **ACCEPTABLE** - All are tradeoffs, not bugs
+
+**New Problems:**
+- ✅ **ACCURATE** - Identifies potential issues
+- ✅ **MITIGATED** - All have solutions
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 PRIORITY ASSESSMENT
+
+### Critical (v1.0 Launch)
+- ❌ **Cross-AI and team recipes** - MUST ADD
+
+### Important (v1.0 Launch)
+- ⚠️ **Demo command** - Nice-to-have (quickstart serves as demo)
+
+### Nice-to-Have (v1.1+)
+- Semantic search
+- Session-level memory
+- Automatic chaining (MCP)
+
+---
+
+## ✅ FINAL VERDICT
+
+**Perplexity's Assessment:** ⚠️ **MOSTLY READY** - Need recipes docs
+
+**Validation:**
+- ✅ 4/5 must-haves met
+- ❌ 1/5 must-have missing (recipes)
+- ✅ All assessments accurate
+- ✅ Honest and realistic
+
+**Status:** ⚠️ **VALIDATED - NEEDS RECIPES DOCUMENTATION**
+
+**Action Required:**
+- [ ] Create cross-AI recipe
+- [ ] Create team collaboration recipe
+- [ ] Add to documentation
+
+---
+
+**Last Updated:** December 13, 2025
+