memorylink 1.0.0

package/docs/PERPLEXITY_AI_VALIDATION_RESPONSE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,350 @@
+# 🤖 PERPLEXITY AI VALIDATION RESPONSE - ANALYSIS
+
+## 📋 RESPONSE RECEIVED
+
+**AI:** Perplexity AI  
+**Date:** December 12, 2025  
+**Validation Type:** Direct validation (not prompts for others)  
+**Tone:** Practical, specific, actionable
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 KEY FINDINGS SUMMARY
+
+### Launch Readiness: **NO → YES (After 4 Small Fixes)**
+
+**Verdict:** 
+- **Current:** 85-90% ready
+- **After fixes:** Ready to ship v1.0
+- **Timeline:** 1-2 days to fix critical gaps
+
+**Key Insight:**
+> "If you fix these four, v1.0 crosses from 'nice experiment' into 'serious tool an early-adopter dev can rely on'."
+
+---
+
+## 🔴 CRITICAL GAPS (Must Fix Before Launch)
+
+### 1. Basic Text Search Over Logs ❌
+**Status:** Missing  
+**Priority:** CRITICAL  
+**Impact:** High - Essential for usability  
+**Effort:** 1-2 hours
+
+**Perplexity's Assessment:**
+> "Right now you only have `--tag` and `--limit`. For 200–1000 entries, devs will absolutely want to 'search by words I remember'."
+
+**What We Need:**
+```bash
+memorylink search "<text>" [--in=memory|learnings|changes] [--tag=...] [--since=...] [--limit=...]
+```
+
+**Implementation:**
+- Simple substring match in `details` field
+- Optional: Also search in `tags`
+- Filter by log type (memory/learnings/changes)
+- Combine with existing filters (--tag, --since, --limit)
+
+**Current State:**
+- ✅ We have `search` command
+- ❌ But it might not have full text search in details
+- Need to verify and enhance
+
+---
+
+### 2. First-Time "Aha" Path ❌
+**Status:** Partial  
+**Priority:** CRITICAL  
+**Impact:** High - User onboarding  
+**Effort:** 2-3 hours
+
+**Perplexity's Assessment:**
+> "A new user can install + run `quickstart` and still not know *why* or *what next*."
+
+**What We Need:**
+- Add to `quickstart`:
+  - 2-3 lines of "what MemoryLink does" in plain language
+  - 3 explicit next commands with examples:
+    ```bash
+    memorylink learn "Fixed login bug" "Added null check" "No more 500s" --status SUCCESS --tags auth,login
+    memorylink get-context --since 7d --limit 10
+    memorylink inject
+    ```
+- Optional but powerful: `memorylink demo` command
+  - Seeds 3-4 fake entries
+  - Shows `get-context` output
+  - Demonstrates value immediately
+
+**Current State:**
+- ✅ We have `quickstart` command
+- ❌ Might not have clear "what next" guidance
+- Need to enhance with examples
+
+---
+
+### 3. Stronger Secret Handling on Write ❌
+**Status:** Partial (doctor scans, but write-time blocking might be weak)  
+**Priority:** CRITICAL  
+**Impact:** High - Security  
+**Effort:** 2-3 hours
+
+**Perplexity's Assessment:**
+> "With plain-text JSONL, you want one more barrier. On write, if `details` clearly matches strong patterns (`sk_live_`, AWS keys, private key blocks), block and require `--allow-secret` to override."
+
+**What We Need:**
+- Enhanced write-time blocking
+- Block on strong patterns (not just detect)
+- Require `--allow-secret` (or `--force`) to override
+- Stronger than current `--force` flag
+
+**Current State:**
+- ✅ We have secret detection (27 patterns)
+- ✅ We have `--force` flag
+- ❌ Might not block aggressively enough on write
+- Need to strengthen write-time blocking
+
+---
+
+### 4. Simple Conflict / Duplication Warning in `doctor` ❌
+**Status:** Missing  
+**Priority:** CRITICAL  
+**Impact:** Medium - Memory quality  
+**Effort:** 2-3 hours
+
+**Perplexity's Assessment:**
+> "Over time, teams will create conflicting or duplicate memories. Add a basic check: Multiple ACTIVE entries with same or very similar `details` + overlapping tags → warn as potential conflict/duplicate."
+
+**What We Need:**
+- Check for duplicate entries
+- Check for conflicting entries
+- Similarity matching (fuzzy match on `details`)
+- Tag overlap detection
+- Warn in `doctor` command
+
+**Implementation:**
+```typescript
+// Pseudo-code
+function checkDuplicates(entries: MemoryEntry[]): Warning[] {
+  // Group by similar details (fuzzy match)
+  // Check for overlapping tags
+  // Warn if multiple ACTIVE entries match
+}
+```
+
+**Current State:**
+- ✅ We have `doctor` command
+- ❌ No duplicate/conflict detection
+- Need to add this check
+
+---
+
+## 🟡 IMPORTANT BUT NOT BLOCKING (v1.1-v1.3)
+
+### 1. Auto-Logging / Better Prompts
+- Suggest `memorylink learn` after `git commit`
+- `watch` command improvements
+- Better prompts for common workflows
+
+### 2. Richer `doctor` Checks
+- Performance checks
+- Size warnings
+- Old entries detection
+
+### 3. More Polished Recipes/Docs
+- "Gemini → MemoryLink → Cursor" example
+- Team usage guide
+- Merge-conflict handling
+
+### 4. Optional Lightweight Web/GUI
+- Not required for v1.0
+- Can wait for v2.0
+
+---
+
+## 🟢 THINGS OK TO DEFER
+
+- MCP server
+- VS Code extension
+- Semantic / vector search
+- Full conversation storage
+- Code snippet storage (file refs are fine for now)
+
+**Perplexity's Assessment:**
+> "These are nice differentiators later, but not required for early launch as a CLI-first, dev-focused tool."
+
+---
+
+## 📊 UPDATED PRIORITY MATRIX
+
+| Gap | Priority | Impact | Effort | Launch Blocking? |
+|-----|----------|--------|--------|------------------|
+| **Text Search** | CRITICAL | High | 1-2 hours | ✅ YES |
+| **Quickstart "Aha"** | CRITICAL | High | 2-3 hours | ✅ YES |
+| **Secret Write Blocking** | CRITICAL | High | 2-3 hours | ✅ YES |
+| **Conflict Detection** | CRITICAL | Medium | 2-3 hours | ✅ YES |
+| **Auto-Logging** | IMPORTANT | Medium | 1-2 days | ❌ No |
+| **Richer Doctor** | IMPORTANT | Medium | 1-2 days | ❌ No |
+| **Better Docs** | IMPORTANT | Medium | 1-2 days | ❌ No |
+
+**Total Effort for Critical Fixes:** 7-11 hours (1-2 days)
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 PERPLEXITY vs OTHER AIs
+
+### Comparison:
+
+| Aspect | Mistral | ChatGPT | Perplexity | Consensus |
+|--------|---------|---------|------------|-----------|
+| **Launch Ready** | Conditional | ✅ YES | ❌ NO (fix 4 items) | Fix then launch |
+| **Auto-Logging** | CRITICAL | ✅ OK | IMPORTANT | v1.1 |
+| **Code Snippets** | CRITICAL | 🟡 Optional | 🟡 Defer | v1.1 |
+| **Text Search** | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | CRITICAL | ✅ Must fix |
+| **Quickstart** | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | CRITICAL | ✅ Must fix |
+| **Secret Blocking** | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | CRITICAL | ✅ Must fix |
+| **Conflict Detection** | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | CRITICAL | ✅ Must fix |
+
+**Key Difference:**
+- Perplexity identified **4 specific, small, high-leverage fixes**
+- These are all quick (1-2 days total)
+- After fixes: Ready to launch
+
+---
+
+## 💡 PERPLEXITY'S KEY INSIGHTS
+
+### 1. Small, High-Leverage Fixes
+> "Think of it as 85–90% ready for real early adopters. There are a few small, high-leverage fixes you should do first."
+
+**Action:** Focus on quick wins, not big features
+
+---
+
+### 2. Text Search is Essential
+> "For 200–1000 entries, devs will absolutely want to 'search by words I remember'."
+
+**Action:** Add substring search in details field
+
+---
+
+### 3. First-Time User Experience
+> "A new user can install + run `quickstart` and still not know *why* or *what next*."
+
+**Action:** Enhance quickstart with examples and "what next" guidance
+
+---
+
+### 4. Security Barrier
+> "With plain-text JSONL, you want one more barrier."
+
+**Action:** Strengthen write-time secret blocking
+
+---
+
+### 5. Memory Quality
+> "This helps keep memory 'sharp' without a GUI."
+
+**Action:** Add conflict/duplicate detection to doctor
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 FINAL VERDICT FROM PERPLEXITY
+
+### Current State:
+- **85-90% ready** for early adopters
+- **"Nice experiment"** level
+- **Not quite "serious tool"** yet
+
+### After 4 Fixes:
+- **Ready to ship v1.0**
+- **"Serious tool"** level
+- **Early-adopter dev can rely on it**
+
+### Timeline:
+- **Fix 4 critical items:** 1-2 days
+- **Then launch:** Ready immediately
+
+---
+
+## ✅ ACTION PLAN
+
+### Phase 1: Critical Fixes (1-2 days)
+
+#### Day 1:
+1. **Text Search Enhancement** (1-2 hours)
+   - Add substring search in `details` field
+   - Enhance `search` command
+   - Test with 100+ entries
+
+2. **Quickstart "Aha" Path** (2-3 hours)
+   - Add "what MemoryLink does" explanation
+   - Add 3 explicit next commands with examples
+   - Optional: Create `demo` command
+
+#### Day 2:
+3. **Stronger Secret Blocking** (2-3 hours)
+   - Enhance write-time blocking
+   - Require `--allow-secret` for strong patterns
+   - Test with various secret patterns
+
+4. **Conflict Detection** (2-3 hours)
+   - Add duplicate detection to `doctor`
+   - Add conflict detection (similar details + overlapping tags)
+   - Test with sample data
+
+### Phase 2: Launch (Day 3)
+- Final testing
+- Documentation update
+- Launch announcement
+
+---
+
+## 📋 UPDATED PRE-LAUNCH CHECKLIST
+
+### Must Fix (Before Launch):
+- [ ] **Text search** - Substring match in details field
+- [ ] **Quickstart enhancement** - "What next" guidance + examples
+- [ ] **Secret write blocking** - Stronger blocking, require --allow-secret
+- [ ] **Conflict detection** - Duplicate/conflict warnings in doctor
+
+### Should Have (v1.1):
+- [ ] Auto-logging suggestions
+- [ ] Richer doctor checks
+- [ ] Better recipes/docs
+
+### Nice to Have (v2.0):
+- [ ] MCP server
+- [ ] VS Code extension
+- [ ] Vector search
+- [ ] Code snippets
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 FINAL RECOMMENDATION
+
+### **FIX 4 CRITICAL ITEMS, THEN LAUNCH**
+
+**Timeline:**
+- **Day 1-2:** Fix 4 critical items (7-11 hours)
+- **Day 3:** Launch
+
+**Why:**
+- All fixes are small and high-leverage
+- Total effort: 1-2 days
+- Transforms from "nice experiment" to "serious tool"
+- Addresses real usability concerns
+
+**After Fixes:**
+- ✅ Ready for early adopters
+- ✅ Serious tool developers can rely on
+- ✅ 85-90% → 95%+ ready
+
+---
+
+## 📅 Document History
+
+- **Created:** December 12, 2025
+- **AI Validated:** Perplexity AI
+- **Status:** Fix 4 items, then launch
+- **Version:** 1.0.0
+

package/docs/PERPLEXITY_AI_VALIDATION_RESPONSE_v2.md

@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+# Perplexity AI Validation Response v2 - Production Readiness & v2.0 Roadmap
+
+**Date**: December 15, 2025  
+**Source**: Perplexity AI Comprehensive Validation  
+**Status**: ✅ Stored in MemoryLink
+
+---
+
+## 📊 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
+
+Perplexity AI provides **strong validation** that **v1.3 is production-ready** for target users, with clear gaps identified for v2.0+. The analysis confirms architecture is sound and provides a focused roadmap for expansion.
+
+**Key Validation**: "No critical gaps for v1.x launch. Your roadmap is the right direction to close the last 10–20% for larger orgs and global competition."
+
+---
+
+## ✅ VALIDATION: PRODUCTION READINESS
+
+### v1.3 is Production-Ready For:
+- ✅ Solo devs
+- ✅ Small–medium teams
+- ✅ JS/TS-heavy codebases
+- ✅ Engineering-centric organizations (CLI + Git comfortable)
+
+### Why Production-Ready:
+- ✅ 5K+ scenarios tested
+- ✅ 18/18 higher-level tests passing
+- ✅ MCP, vector search, code graph, patterns all in place
+- ✅ Enhanced change logging implemented
+
+**Verdict**: "No critical gaps for v1.x launch."
+
+---
+
+## 🔍 GAP ANALYSIS: What's Missing
+
+### Critical Gaps (v2.0+):
+
+1. **Language Coverage** ⚠️
+   - JS/TS AST is good, but Python/Go/Rust backends need structure features
+   - **Not a blocker** for launch, but limits "wow" factor
+   - **Solution**: Tree-sitter multi-language support
+
+2. **Visual/Organizational UX** ⚠️
+   - CLI + MCP is sufficient for devs
+   - Leads/architects will want dashboard
+   - **Solution**: Lightweight web dashboard
+
+3. **Org-Level Governance / RBAC** ⚠️
+   - For enterprise (hundreds of devs)
+   - "Who can change rules?" "Can we lock memories?"
+   - **Solution**: RBAC and governance features
+
+### Not Blockers:
+- ✅ Individual devs: Fine
+- ✅ Small teams: Fine
+- ⚠️ Fortune-500: Will need v2.x features
+
+---
+
+## 🏗️ ARCHITECTURE VALIDATION
+
+### Scalability:
+- ✅ JSONL + streaming + pagination: Fine up to **100K entries**
+- ✅ Heavy work (structure graph, patterns) offloaded to derived JSON files
+- ⚠️ For 1M+ entries: Add compaction/archival, optional local index (SQLite/DuckDB)
+
+### Enterprise Suitability:
+- ✅ File-based, Git-native is a **plus** for engineering-centric orgs
+- ⚠️ For regulated environments: May add encryption-at-rest, secure volume mounting
+
+**Verdict**: "No immediate architectural changes required. Your current design will carry you through v2.0."
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 COMPETITIVE POSITIONING
+
+### Unique Advantages:
+- ✅ Local-first, Git-native, tool-agnostic memory
+- ✅ Integrated code structure + team patterns + decisions/learnings
+- ✅ Strong enforcement (protected files, audit trail)
+
+### Disadvantages (Acceptable):
+- ⚠️ No hosted API/SaaS (for people who want HTTP memory service)
+- ⚠️ Structure analysis initially JS/TS (others have broader coverage)
+- ⚠️ No built-in IDE (integrate via MCP)
+
+**Positioning**: "The Git-native project brain for AI coding tools – decisions, structure, and team patterns in one place."
+
+---
+
+## 📋 v2.0+ ROADMAP (Perplexity AI's Recommendations)
+
+### Priority 1: Multi-Language Structure
+- **Tree-sitter or similar** for Python/Go/Rust parsing
+- Extends code-graph to more teams
+- Moves closer to Sourcegraph/Cody territory while staying local
+
+### Priority 2: Org-Level / Multi-Repo Memory
+- Aggregate patterns and learnings across repos
+- Simple "global learnings" view for a company
+
+### Priority 3: Lightweight Web Dashboard
+- Browse rules, patterns, and impacts
+- Filter by repo, team, tag
+- Not a full app, but enough for leads/architects
+
+### Priority 4: Optional Security/Encryption Layer
+- For enterprises that require it
+- Wrap `.memorylink/` with encryption option
+
+---
+
+## 🔧 CLOSING THE 3 GAPS (Detailed Plan)
+
+### Gap 1: Hosted API / SaaS
+
+**Solution**: `memorylink serve` command
+
+**Implementation**:
+```bash
+memorylink serve --port 8080 --token <API_KEY>
+```
+
+**Endpoints**:
+- `POST /api/memory` - Create memory
+- `GET /api/memory` - List/search/filter
+- `GET /api/context` - Get context
+- `GET /api/code-graph` - Return code-graph.json
+- `GET /api/team-patterns` - Return team-patterns.json
+- `POST /api/impact` - Run impact for file
+
+**Architecture**: Keep `.memorylink/` as source of truth, HTTP layer on top
+
+---
+
+### Gap 2: Broader Language Coverage
+
+**Solution**: Tree-sitter integration
+
+**Implementation**:
+- Abstract `CodeAnalyzer` interface
+- Per-language analyzers: `PythonAnalyzer`, `GoAnalyzer`, `RustAnalyzer`
+- Language detection based on file extension
+- `graph build` automatically uses correct analyzer
+
+**Start**: Python + Go first, refine later
+
+---
+
+### Gap 3: "Built-in IDE" Experience
+
+**Solution**: Strong MCP + VS Code Extension
+
+**Implementation**:
+1. **MCP Server** (already started)
+   - Expose MemoryLink as MCP tools
+   - Agents call automatically on every task
+
+2. **VS Code Extension**
+   - Sidebar: "Project Rules", "Recent Learnings", "Impact for current file"
+   - Command: "Ask AI with MemoryLink Context"
+
+3. **Optional**: Minimal "MemoryLink Studio" (Tauri/Electron app)
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 WHAT MEMORYLINK WILL BE (Final Shape)
+
+Once gaps are closed, MemoryLink provides:
+
+1. **Decision & Reasoning Memory** ✅
+   - Why choices were made, what worked/failed, who approved
+   - Audit + context at Git level
+
+2. **Code Structure & Impact Memory** ✅
+   - Dependency graph across languages
+   - Impact analysis for any file
+
+3. **Team Pattern Memory** ✅
+   - Aggregated best practices
+   - Explicit and inspectable
+
+4. **Enforcement & Safety** ✅
+   - Protected files, change logging, secret blocking, audit trails
+
+5. **Universal Access Modes** ⚠️
+   - CLI ✅
+   - MCP/tools ✅
+   - HTTP API ❌ (to be added)
+
+---
+
+## 📊 PROBLEMS SOLVED (Real Users)
+
+1. **"We keep re-deciding the same things"** ✅
+   - Decisions + learnings are first-class, searchable
+
+2. **"Agents don't know our project's structure"** ✅
+   - Code graph + impact shows what changes will touch
+
+3. **"Everyone codes differently; patterns aren't consistent"** ✅
+   - Team patterns distill what works in this repo
+
+4. **"We're scared AI will break or leak things"** ✅
+   - Protected files + audit + secret blocking
+
+5. **"Every tool has its own memory; nothing syncs"** ✅
+   - One `.memorylink/` per repo, shared via Git + MCP + API
+
+---
+
+## 🔄 COMPARISON WITH COMPETITORS
+
+| Tool | Strengths | What MemoryLink Adds |
+|------|-----------|---------------------|
+| **Mem0/Supermemory** | Cloud APIs, embeddings | Local/Git-native, repo-centric, enforcement, code graph |
+| **Sourcegraph Cody** | Code graph, search, IDE | Structured decisions/learn/patterns + universal AI access |
+| **Cursor/Windsurf** | Great IDE experience | Persistent, cross-tool memory and audit outside IDE |
+| **Tabnine/Copilot** | Inline completion | Patterns as explicit, auditable data for all tools |
+
+**Unique Combination**: No one else combines Git-native logs + code graph + team patterns + enforcement + multi-AI integration.
+
+---
+
+## ✅ FINAL VALIDATION
+
+### Concept/Architecture:
+- ✅ **Complete and coherent**
+- ✅ Additional features are **refinements, not fundamentals**
+
+### Production Readiness:
+- ✅ **v1.3 is production-ready** for target users
+- ✅ **No critical gaps** for v1.x launch
+- ⚠️ **v2.0+ roadmap** closes last 10–20% for larger orgs
+
+### Remaining Work:
+- Execution quality (performance, language coverage, integrations)
+- Not missing core concepts
+
+---
+
+## 📋 RECOMMENDED ORDER (Perplexity AI)
+
+1. **Hosted HTTP API** (`memorylink serve`)
+   - Basic CRUD + context endpoints
+
+2. **Tree-sitter Integration** (Python + Go first)
+   - Extend `graph build` and `impact`
+
+3. **VS Code Extension + Stronger MCP Tools**
+   - "Ask AI with MemoryLink" command
+   - Sidebar views
+
+---
+
+**Status**: ✅ Validated and Stored  
+**Priority**: High (confirms production readiness, provides clear v2.0 roadmap)  
+**Gap**: HTTP API, multi-language, web dashboard
+