memorylink 1.0.0

package/AI_CONSENSUS_ANALYSIS_v6.md

@@ -0,0 +1,432 @@
+# AI Consensus Analysis v6: ChatGPT + Mistral + Perplexity + Grok + Gemini + Qwen + DeepSeek
+
+**Date**: December 15, 2025  
+**Status**: 7 AIs Analyzed, Comprehensive Consensus with Business Strategy
+
+---
+
+## 📊 RESPONSE SUMMARY
+
+| AI | Key Insight | Production Ready? | Main Gap Identified |
+|----|------------|-------------------|-------------------|
+| **ChatGPT v2** | Decision-Aware Structure Memory (WHY) | ✅ Yes | Human-verified structure notes, decision links |
+| **Mistral AI v2** | 3-Phase Roadmap (Local-First) | ✅ Yes | Conversational memory, HTML visualization |
+| **Perplexity AI v2** | Production-Ready Validation | ✅ **Confirmed** | HTTP API, multi-language, web dashboard |
+| **Grok AI v2** | Comprehensive Analysis + Roadmap | ✅ **Strongest Validation** | Tree-sitter, dashboard, compaction, merge driver |
+| **Gemini AI v2** | Codebase Intelligence Platform | ✅ **Extremely Strong** | Tree-sitter, dashboard, real-time collaboration |
+| **Qwen AI v2** | The Missing Layer / Coordination Protocol | ✅ **Complete** | **None - v1.0 is complete, ship now** |
+| **DeepSeek AI v2** | Comprehensive Analysis & Vision | ✅ **Well-Executed** | Conflict resolution, security model, scalability |
+
+---
+
+## ✅ CONSENSUS: PRODUCTION READINESS
+
+### All 7 AIs Agree:
+- ✅ **v1.3+ is production-ready** for target users
+- ✅ **No critical gaps** for v1.x launch
+- ✅ Architecture is sound and scalable
+- ✅ Core features are complete
+
+**DeepSeek AI**: "MemoryLink represents a **well-executed v1.0 implementation** with thoughtful architecture and strong alignment with current AI development trends."
+
+**Qwen AI**: "✅ **YES — THIS VALIDATION DOCUMENT IS COMPLETE, ACCURATE, AND READY**" and "**v1.0 is complete** — no gaps, no over-engineering"
+
+**Gemini AI**: "MemoryLink v1.3 is in an **extremely strong, production-ready state.**"
+
+**Grok AI**: "MemoryLink v1.3+ is legitimately production-ready and already one of the strongest open/local/universal memory layers currently available."
+
+---
+
+## 🔍 CRITICAL GAP ANALYSIS (DeepSeek AI)
+
+### 🚨 High-Priority Gaps (Prevent Adoption):
+
+1. **Conflict Resolution in Team Scenarios** (DeepSeek AI)
+   - **Issue**: When 5+ developers merge memory files via Git, conflicts will be frequent and complex
+   - **Impact**: Could make team usage impractical beyond 3-4 developers
+   - **Solution**: Structured merge strategies, conflict resolution tools, or database backend option
+   - **Status**: ❌ Not implemented
+
+2. **Security Model Limitations** (DeepSeek AI)
+   - **Issue**: `.memorylink/` contains project intelligence that could be security-sensitive
+   - **Impact**: Companies may reject due to intellectual property leakage risk
+   - **Solution**: Encryption options, access controls, audit logs
+   - **Status**: ⚠️ Partial (secret detection exists, but no encryption)
+
+3. **Scalability Concerns** (DeepSeek AI)
+   - **Issue**: JSONL files with 100K+ entries may become unwieldy
+   - **Impact**: Performance degradation in large enterprises
+   - **Solution**: Partitioned storage, binary format option, or SQLite backend
+   - **Status**: ⚠️ Partial (streaming exists, but no partitioning)
+
+### ⚠️ Medium-Priority Gaps:
+
+4. **Lack of Offline First Support** (DeepSeek AI)
+   - **Issue**: Vector search requires OpenAI API
+   - **Impact**: Breaks workflow for offline developers or air-gapped environments
+   - **Solution**: Local embedding models (SentenceTransformers) or optional offline mode
+   - **Status**: ❌ Not implemented
+
+5. **IDE Integration Depth** (DeepSeek AI)
+   - **Issue**: VS Code/IntelliJ native extensions missing
+   - **Impact**: Friction for non-Cursor users
+   - **Solution**: VS Code extension with inline suggestions
+   - **Status**: ❌ Not implemented
+
+---
+
+## 🔄 FEATURE CONSENSUS
+
+### All 7 AIs Agree On (Already Implemented):
+1. ✅ **Code Structure Memory** - All recommend (we have it v1.2)
+2. ✅ **Team Pattern Detection** - All recommend (we have it v1.3)
+3. ✅ **Change Impact Analysis** - All recommend (we have it v1.2)
+4. ✅ **Local-First Privacy** - All emphasize (we have it)
+5. ✅ **Git-Native Workflow** - All emphasize (we have it)
+6. ✅ **MCP Integration** - All support (we have it v1.1)
+7. ✅ **Enforcement** - All emphasize (we have it - Git hooks)
+
+### 4+ AIs Agree On (Very High Priority):
+1. ⚠️ **Tree-sitter Multi-Language** - Mistral + Perplexity + Grok + Gemini (4 AIs)
+   - **Qwen AI**: "JS/TS covers 90% of use cases; can defer"
+   - **DeepSeek AI**: Not explicitly mentioned (focuses on other gaps)
+
+2. ⚠️ **Web Dashboard** - Mistral + Perplexity + Grok + Gemini (4 AIs)
+   - **Qwen AI**: "CLI is faster, Git-native, zero infra; can defer"
+   - **DeepSeek AI**: Mentions in v2.0 Enterprise phase
+
+### 2+ AIs Agree On (High Priority):
+3. ⚠️ **HTTP API** - Perplexity + Grok (2 AIs)
+   - **Qwen AI**: "Manual `get-context` works for v1.0; can defer"
+   - **DeepSeek AI**: Mentions REST API in Phase 2
+
+4. ⚠️ **Conflict Resolution** - DeepSeek AI (critical for teams)
+   - **Grok AI**: Mentions Git merge driver (related)
+   - **Gemini AI**: Mentions real-time collaboration (related)
+
+5. ⚠️ **Compaction/Vacuum** - Grok AI (mentioned by others indirectly)
+
+6. ⚠️ **Real-time Collaboration** - Gemini AI (enterprise scale concern)
+
+### Only 1 AI Recommends:
+1. **ChatGPT**: Human-verified structure notes, decision links, observed impacts
+2. **Mistral AI**: Conversational memory (user preferences)
+3. **Grok AI**: Git merge driver, GPG signing, incremental graph updates, LanceDB
+4. **Gemini AI**: Graph caching, storage abstraction for 100s of repos, external secret redaction
+5. **Qwen AI**: **Ship NOW** - v1.0 is complete, defer optional features
+6. **DeepSeek AI**: Security model (encryption), offline support (local embeddings), VS Code extension, auto-cleanup, backup/restore
+
+---
+
+## 📋 GAP ANALYSIS: Consolidated (7 AIs)
+
+### Very High Priority (4+ AIs Recommend, BUT Qwen AI Says Defer):
+1. ⚠️ **Tree-sitter Multi-Language Support**
+   - **Mistral AI**: Phase 2 priority
+   - **Perplexity AI**: v2.0+ priority
+   - **Grok AI**: Phase 1 (2-3 weeks), unblocks 40% of teams
+   - **Gemini AI**: P1 (v1.5), expands addressable market by 300%
+   - **Qwen AI**: "JS/TS covers 90% of use cases; can defer"
+   - **DeepSeek AI**: Not explicitly mentioned
+   - **Status**: Deferred (we have JS/TS only)
+   - **Impact**: VERY HIGH - But optional for launch
+
+2. ⚠️ **Web Dashboard / Visualization**
+   - **Mistral AI**: HTML graph visualization
+   - **Perplexity AI**: Lightweight web dashboard
+   - **Grok AI**: Local web dashboard (Tauri+React, 3-4 weeks), 10× adoption boost
+   - **Gemini AI**: Enterprise visibility dashboard (React/Vue/Svelte, Vis.js/D3)
+   - **Qwen AI**: "CLI is faster, Git-native, zero infra; can defer"
+   - **DeepSeek AI**: Mentions in v2.0 Enterprise phase
+   - **Status**: Partial (we have `--visual` flag, no HTML/web UI)
+   - **Impact**: VERY HIGH - But optional for launch
+
+### High Priority (DeepSeek AI + Others):
+3. ⚠️ **Conflict Resolution** (DeepSeek AI - Critical)
+   - **Issue**: 5+ developers merge memory files via Git, conflicts frequent
+   - **Grok AI**: Mentions Git merge driver (related)
+   - **Gemini AI**: Mentions real-time collaboration (related)
+   - **Status**: ❌ Not implemented
+   - **Impact**: HIGH - Critical for team adoption
+
+4. ⚠️ **Security Model** (DeepSeek AI)
+   - **Issue**: `.memorylink/` contains project intelligence, IP leakage risk
+   - **Solution**: Encryption options, access controls, audit logs
+   - **Status**: ⚠️ Partial (secret detection exists, but no encryption)
+   - **Impact**: HIGH - Enterprise adoption blocker
+
+5. ⚠️ **Scalability** (DeepSeek AI)
+   - **Issue**: JSONL files with 100K+ entries may become unwieldy
+   - **Solution**: Partitioned storage, binary format, or SQLite backend
+   - **Status**: ⚠️ Partial (streaming exists, but no partitioning)
+   - **Impact**: MEDIUM - Large enterprise concern
+
+### Medium Priority:
+6. ⚠️ **Offline First Support** (DeepSeek AI)
+   - **Issue**: Vector search requires OpenAI API
+   - **Solution**: Local embedding models (SentenceTransformers)
+   - **Status**: ❌ Not implemented
+   - **Impact**: MEDIUM - Air-gapped environments
+
+7. ⚠️ **VS Code Extension** (DeepSeek AI)
+   - **Issue**: MCP server great for Claude/Cursor, but VS Code/IntelliJ native extensions missing
+   - **Solution**: VS Code extension with inline suggestions
+   - **Status**: ❌ Not implemented
+   - **Impact**: MEDIUM - Friction for non-Cursor users
+
+8. ⚠️ **HTTP API** (Perplexity + Grok + DeepSeek)
+   - **Perplexity AI**: `memorylink serve` command
+   - **Grok AI**: Local server mode
+   - **DeepSeek AI**: REST API in Phase 2
+   - **Status**: ❌ Not implemented
+   - **Impact**: HIGH - But optional for launch
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY (Consensus - 7 AIs)
+
+### DeepSeek AI's Immediate Actions (Pre-launch):
+1. **Add conflict resolution** - Critical for team adoption
+2. **Implement local embedding option** - For offline/security-conscious users
+3. **Create migration utility** - From cloud solutions to MemoryLink
+
+### DeepSeek AI's Short-term (3-6 months):
+1. **VS Code Extension** - Broaden IDE support
+2. **REST API** - Enable custom integrations
+3. **Usage Analytics** - Understand how teams use it
+
+### DeepSeek AI's Long-term (6-12 months):
+1. **Enterprise Edition** - With database backend, RBAC
+2. **AI Training Pipeline** - Fine-tune models on project data
+3. **Marketplace** - Share patterns across organizations
+
+### v1.5 Priorities (4+ AIs Agree, BUT Qwen AI Says Defer):
+
+1. **Tree-sitter Multi-Language** (Mistral + Perplexity + Grok + Gemini)
+   - **Qwen AI**: Can defer - "JS/TS covers 90% of use cases"
+   - **DeepSeek AI**: Not explicitly mentioned
+   - **Impact**: VERY HIGH - But optional for launch
+
+2. **Web Dashboard** (Mistral + Perplexity + Grok + Gemini)
+   - **Qwen AI**: Can defer - "CLI is faster, Git-native, zero infra"
+   - **DeepSeek AI**: Mentions in v2.0 Enterprise phase
+   - **Impact**: VERY HIGH - But optional for launch
+
+### v2.0 Priorities (DeepSeek AI + Others):
+
+3. **Conflict Resolution** (DeepSeek AI - Critical)
+   - **Impact**: HIGH - Critical for team adoption
+
+4. **Security Model** (DeepSeek AI)
+   - **Impact**: HIGH - Enterprise adoption blocker
+
+5. **Scalability** (DeepSeek AI)
+   - **Impact**: MEDIUM - Large enterprise concern
+
+6. **HTTP API** (Perplexity + Grok + DeepSeek)
+   - **Impact**: HIGH - But optional for launch
+
+---
+
+## 💡 PHILOSOPHICAL ALIGNMENT
+
+### All 7 AIs Agree:
+- ✅ **Local-first privacy** is the differentiator
+- ✅ **Git-native workflow** is unique advantage
+- ✅ **Multi-AI integration** is valuable
+- ✅ **Code structure + team patterns + decisions** in one system is powerful
+- ✅ **Production-ready** for target users
+- ✅ **Enforcement** is critical (Git hooks block protected files)
+
+### Unique Insights:
+
+**ChatGPT**: "WHY" vs "WHAT" - Decision-aware memory is the differentiator
+
+**Mistral AI**: 3-phase approach - Core → Expand → Rollout
+
+**Perplexity AI**: Production-ready validation - Confirms no critical gaps
+
+**Grok AI**: "Indie powerhouse" - Cheaper, more private, dev-centric. Already 12-18 months ahead on agent trends.
+
+**Gemini AI**: "Codebase Intelligence Platform" - v1.3 transitions from simple tool to platform. "Secure, Auditable Brain for Enterprise Codebases" vs competitors' "Universal Brains for Conversational Context."
+
+**Qwen AI**: "The Missing Layer" - Problem is "Memory Coordination" not "Memory Storage". "MemoryLink's moat is enforcement + simplicity — not features." **Ship NOW - v1.0 is complete.**
+
+**DeepSeek AI**: "The .git of AI memory" - Standard format everyone uses. "Not just a product. A new category. The memory layer for AI development." Provides comprehensive business model and market impact analysis.
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 FINAL RECOMMENDATION (7 AIs Consensus)
+
+### Qwen AI's Unique Position:
+**"Ship v1.0 exactly as designed. The world is waiting for enforcement, not just memory."**
+
+### DeepSeek AI's Recommendation:
+**"Launch v1.0, gather user feedback, prioritize team features based on adoption patterns."**
+
+### Keep What We Have:
+- ✅ Automatic AST parsing (v1.2) - All AIs support
+- ✅ Dependency graphs - All AIs support
+- ✅ Team patterns - All AIs support
+- ✅ Impact analysis - All AIs support
+- ✅ MCP integration - All AIs support
+- ✅ Enforcement (Git hooks) - All AIs emphasize
+- ✅ Trinity of Critical Features - All AIs confirm resolves blockers
+
+### Add (Consensus - 4+ AIs, BUT Qwen AI Says Defer):
+1. ⚠️ **Tree-sitter multi-language** (Mistral + Perplexity + Grok + Gemini) - **OPTIONAL for launch**
+2. ⚠️ **Web dashboard** (Mistral + Perplexity + Grok + Gemini) - **OPTIONAL for launch**
+
+### Add (DeepSeek AI - Critical for Teams):
+3. ⚠️ **Conflict resolution** (DeepSeek AI) - **HIGH PRIORITY for team adoption**
+4. ⚠️ **Security model** (DeepSeek AI) - **HIGH PRIORITY for enterprise**
+5. ⚠️ **Scalability** (DeepSeek AI) - **MEDIUM PRIORITY for large enterprises**
+
+### Add (Consensus - 2+ AIs, BUT Qwen AI Says Defer):
+6. ⚠️ **HTTP API** (Perplexity + Grok + DeepSeek) - **OPTIONAL for launch**
+
+---
+
+## 📊 GAP CLOSURE ASSESSMENT
+
+### Current State (v1.3):
+- ✅ Core features: 100% complete
+- ✅ Production-ready: Confirmed by all 7 AIs
+- ✅ Trinity of Critical Features: Implemented
+- ✅ Codebase Intelligence Layer: Implemented
+- ✅ Enforcement: Implemented (Git hooks)
+- ⚠️ Language support: JS/TS only (Qwen AI says this is fine)
+- ⚠️ Visualization: Partial (`--visual` flag) (Qwen AI says CLI is better)
+- ❌ Conflict resolution: Missing (DeepSeek AI: critical for teams)
+- ❌ Security model: Partial (DeepSeek AI: encryption needed)
+- ❌ Scalability: Partial (DeepSeek AI: partitioning needed)
+- ❌ HTTP API: Missing (Qwen AI says manual works for v1.0)
+
+### DeepSeek AI's Perspective:
+**"Ready for Launch: ✅ YES"** with caveats:
+1. Clear documentation of team usage limitations
+2. Backup strategy for memory file corruption
+3. Rollback plan if performance issues emerge
+
+---
+
+## 🚀 RECOMMENDED SPRINT PLANS
+
+### Qwen AI's Recommendation (Most Conservative):
+**"Ship v1.0 exactly as designed. The world is waiting for enforcement, not just memory."**
+
+**Timeline**: **NOW** - 6-12 month window before competitors copy
+
+### DeepSeek AI's Recommendation (Balanced):
+**"Launch v1.0, gather user feedback, prioritize team features based on adoption patterns."**
+
+**Immediate Actions**:
+1. Add conflict resolution (critical for team adoption)
+2. Implement local embedding option
+3. Create migration utility
+
+**Short-term**:
+1. VS Code Extension
+2. REST API
+3. Usage Analytics
+
+### Grok AI's 8-Week Sprint (Most Actionable):
+1. **Tree-sitter multi-language** (2-3 weeks)
+2. **Local web dashboard** (3-4 weeks)
+3. **Git merge driver + compaction** (1-2 weeks)
+
+---
+
+## 📊 COMPETITIVE POSITIONING (DeepSeek AI Analysis)
+
+**DeepSeek AI's Key Differentiator**: "MemoryLink is the **SWITZERLAND** of AI memory - neutral, works with everyone, no lock-in."
+
+| Feature | MemoryLink | Mem0.ai | Cursor Memory | GitHub Copilot | SuperMemory |
+|---------|------------|---------|---------------|----------------|------------|
+| **Multi-AI Support** | ✅ ALL AI tools | ❌ Their AI only | ❌ Cursor only | ❌ Copilot only | ❌ Their AI only |
+| **No Vendor Lock-in** | ✅ Open format | ❌ Cloud locked | ❌ Editor locked | ❌ Microsoft locked | ❌ Platform locked |
+| **Git Integration** | ✅ Native | ❌ Manual sync | ⚠️ Limited | ❌ None | ❌ None |
+| **Code Structure** | ✅ AST parsing | ❌ Text only | ❌ Text only | ❌ No memory | ❌ Text only |
+| **Team Patterns** | ✅ Detected | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
+| **File Protection** | ✅ Yes | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
+| **Offline First** | ✅ Coming | ❌ Cloud only | ⚠️ Limited | ❌ Cloud only | ❌ Cloud only |
+| **Self-hosted** | ✅ Option | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No | ❌ No |
+
+---
+
+## 💰 BUSINESS MODEL (DeepSeek AI)
+
+### Open Source Core
+- Free forever
+- CLI + basic features
+- Drives adoption
+
+### MemoryLink Pro ($15/user/month)
+- Team conflict resolution
+- Advanced analytics
+- VS Code extension
+- Priority support
+
+### MemoryLink Enterprise (Custom pricing)
+- SSO/RBAC
+- On-prem deployment
+- Custom integrations
+- SLA + support
+
+### MemoryLink Cloud (Future)
+- Real-time collaboration
+- Shared pattern marketplace
+- AI model fine-tuning service
+
+---
+
+## 📈 MARKET IMPACT (DeepSeek AI)
+
+### For Developers:
+- 50% less time re-teaching AI context
+- 30% faster onboarding for new team members
+- 40% more consistent code quality
+
+### For Companies:
+- Eliminate "bus factor" knowledge risk
+- Better compliance with audit trails
+- Training data for custom AI models
+
+### For AI Ecosystem:
+- Standard memory format emerges
+- Better AI suggestions across all tools
+- More developers using multiple AI tools
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 ULTIMATE VISION (DeepSeek AI)
+
+**DeepSeek AI's Final Vision**: "MemoryLink becomes **The .git of AI memory** - Standard format everyone uses."
+
+**Not just a product. A new category. The memory layer for AI development.**
+
+**When MemoryLink succeeds, developers will say:**
+*"I can't imagine coding without it. My AI actually understands my project history, my team's patterns, and makes suggestions that fit OUR way of working."*
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 NEXT STEPS
+
+1. ✅ **Stored all 7 AI responses**
+2. ✅ **Identified strong consensus** (4+ AIs agree on Tree-sitter + dashboard)
+3. ✅ **Identified unique perspectives** (Qwen AI: ship now, DeepSeek AI: business model)
+4. ✅ **Identified critical gaps** (DeepSeek AI: conflict resolution, security, scalability)
+5. ⏳ **Wait for more AI responses** (if any)
+6. ⏳ **Finalize v1.5/v2.0 roadmap** based on consensus
+7. ⏳ **Decision point**: Ship v1.3 now (Qwen AI) or add features first (other AIs)
+
+---
+
+**Status**: ✅ Consensus Analysis Complete  
+**Responses Analyzed**: 7/10  
+**Consensus Found**: Yes (Tree-sitter, web dashboard - 4+ AIs agree, BUT Qwen AI says defer)  
+**Production Ready**: ✅ Confirmed by all 7 AIs  
+**Critical Gaps Identified**: ✅ Conflict resolution (DeepSeek AI), Security model (DeepSeek AI), Scalability (DeepSeek AI)  
+**Business Model**: ✅ Provided by DeepSeek AI  
+**Ultimate Vision**: ✅ "The .git of AI memory" (DeepSeek AI)
+

package/AI_PANEL_CLARIFICATION_REQUEST.md

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# AI Panel Clarification Request (67% vs 33%)
+
+**Goal**: Get all AIs to clarify the remaining 33% concerns (Tree-sitter, Web Dashboard timing) so we can lock the launch plan.
+
+## Current Standing
+- **67% (6/9)**: Ship v1.3 now; defer Tree-sitter + Dashboard (demand-driven).
+- **22% (2/9)**: Build Tree-sitter + Dashboard pre-launch (4–6 weeks) to avoid agent/user abandonment.
+- **11% (1/9)**: Launch v1.3 now, pre-announce rapid v1.5 rollout (2–4 weeks) for Tree-sitter + Dashboard.
+
+## What We Need From Each AI (clarify with data)
+1) **Abandonment risk quant**: Realistic % loss if v1.3 ships JS/TS-only, CLI-first (no dashboard). Early adopter segments most at risk (Python/Go vs JS/TS; non-CLI vs CLI).
+2) **Time-to-failure**: How quickly do agents “fail” in polyglot or non-CLI teams? Hours? First task? What evidence?
+3) **Mitigations that actually work**: Is pre-announcing v1.5 enough? Do tags like “JS/TS Optimized” + roadmap materially reduce churn? What’s the expected reduction?
+4) **Market now vs 60 days**: In the current AI boom, is speed-to-market worth more than feature-completeness? Any benchmarks (Stars/week, retention deltas) from similar devtools?
+5) **User intent mix**: Expected split of early users: JS/TS % vs Python/Go %; CLI-comfortable vs visual-first. How does that shift risk?
+6) **AI company moves**: What are leading AI tool vendors prioritizing now (MCP-like, plugins, dashboards, multi-lang)? How does that change risk if we defer?
+7) **Minimal commitments**: If we ship now, what’s the smallest credible promise to keep trust? (e.g., “v1.5: Python/Go + read-only dashboard in 2–4 weeks”)
+8) **Proof points**: Concrete scenarios where Tree-sitter or Dashboard is decisive vs non-decisive. Include 1–2 real-world failure modes and success modes.
+
+## Our Proposed Path (for AI validation)
+- **Default plan (67%)**: Launch v1.3 in 3 days with read-only viewer + minimal website; VS Code extension recommended; defer Tree-sitter + Dashboard unless demand.
+- **Hybrid safeguard (addresses 33%)**: Pre-announce v1.5 (2–4 weeks) for Tree-sitter + lightweight dashboard; build if thresholds hit (≥100 Python/Go requests; ≥50 dashboard complaints).
+- **Messaging**: “JS/TS optimized today. Python/Go + visual view coming in v1.5 (2–4 weeks) based on your feedback.”
+
+## What to Decide After AI Responses
+- Launch messaging (include or exclude pre-announcement).
+- Thresholds and timers for v1.5 (Tree-sitter, Dashboard).
+- Whether to start VS Code extension pre-launch or slip to v1.4.
+- Final business model framing (Free Forever + Enterprise vs Free/Pro/Enterprise) relative to speed vs completeness.
+
+## What Success Looks Like
+- A clear, data-backed go/no-go on pre-announcing v1.5.
+- Agreed thresholds for Tree-sitter/Dashboard.
+- Validated risk mitigation for agent failures in polyglot/visual teams without delaying launch.
+
+Please respond with concise, quantified guidance where possible. Short, direct answers appreciated. 
+