memorylink 1.0.0

package/docs/AI_TESTING_PROMPT.md

@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@
+# 🧪 MEMORYLINK v1.0 - COMPREHENSIVE AI TESTING PROMPT
+
+**Purpose:** Get all AIs to test MemoryLink v1.0 with real-world scenarios before launch  
+**Date:** December 13, 2025  
+**Version:** 1.0.0 (Pre-Launch)
+
+---
+
+## 📋 INSTRUCTIONS FOR AI TESTERS
+
+**Copy this entire prompt and ask each AI (Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen, Grok, Manus, Black Box):**
+
+---
+
+# 🧪 MEMORYLINK v1.0 - REAL-WORLD TESTING REQUEST
+
+I've built MemoryLink v1.0, a universal memory layer for AI coding assistants. **Before launching, I need you to test it with real-world scenarios and identify any gaps or missing features.**
+
+## 🎯 WHAT MEMORYLINK v1.0 DOES
+
+MemoryLink creates a `.memorylink/` folder in your project with 4 text files:
+- `protected.txt` - Files AI cannot modify
+- `memory.log` - Shared context across all AIs (JSONL format)
+- `changes.log` - Audit trail of all changes (JSONL format)
+- `learnings.log` - Tracks SUCCESS/FAILED solutions (JSONL format)
+
+**Key Features Implemented:**
+1. ✅ **Auto-Logging** - Git post-commit hook auto-logs changes
+2. ✅ **Code Snippets** - `memorylink snippet` command stores code
+3. ✅ **Git Sync** - `memorylink sync` auto-commits memory files
+4. ✅ **Memory Usage Gap Fix** - Rules/preferences auto-sync to `.cursorrules`
+5. ✅ **Secret Detection** - Blocks secrets at write time (27 patterns)
+6. ✅ **File Protection** - Git hooks prevent editing protected files
+7. ✅ **Tag Normalization** - Auto-normalizes tags (lowercase, hyphenate)
+8. ✅ **Windows Path Handling** - Cross-platform path normalization
+9. ✅ **Conflict Detection** - `doctor` command detects duplicates
+10. ✅ **Search** - Keyword search across all logs
+11. ✅ **Agent Contract** - Copy-pasteable instructions for all AIs
+12. ✅ **Hello World Loop** - Quickstart demonstrates full memory loop
+13. ✅ **Troubleshooting Guide** - Minimal guide for common errors
+
+**CLI Commands:**
+- `memorylink init` - Initialize
+- `memorylink quickstart` - One-command setup
+- `memorylink memory "..."` - Add memory entry
+- `memorylink learn "problem" "solution" --status SUCCESS/FAILED` - Track learnings
+- `memorylink protect <file>` - Protect files
+- `memorylink get-context` - Get filtered context (rules first)
+- `memorylink inject` - Copy context to clipboard
+- `memorylink search "keyword"` - Search entries
+- `memorylink sync` - Auto-commit memory files
+- `memorylink doctor` - Health check
+- `memorylink setup cursor` - Setup for Cursor AI
+- `memorylink sync-rules` - Generate rules.md from memory.log
+- `memorylink auto-context enable` - Enable auto-context mode
+
+---
+
+## 🧪 TESTING REQUEST
+
+**Please test MemoryLink v1.0 with these real-world scenarios:**
+
+### SCENARIO 1: New Developer Onboarding
+**Test:** A new developer joins a team project
+1. Run `memorylink quickstart`
+2. Check if they understand what to do next
+3. Verify Agent Contract is clear
+4. Test if they can add their first memory entry
+5. Test if they can get context and use it
+
+**Questions:**
+- Is the onboarding clear?
+- Is the "Hello World" loop helpful?
+- Is the Agent Contract copy-pasteable?
+- What's missing?
+
+---
+
+### SCENARIO 2: Cross-AI Memory Sharing
+**Test:** Developer uses Cursor AI in morning, Claude in afternoon
+1. Add memory in Cursor: `memorylink memory "Project uses TypeScript" --tags tech`
+2. Add learning in Cursor: `memorylink learn "Bug" "Fix" --status SUCCESS`
+3. Switch to Claude, run: `memorylink get-context`
+4. Verify Claude sees the memory and learning
+
+**Questions:**
+- Does cross-AI sharing work?
+- Is the context format clear?
+- What's missing?
+
+---
+
+### SCENARIO 3: Preventing Mistakes
+**Test:** Developer tries to make common mistakes
+1. Try to store secret: `memorylink memory "API_KEY=sk_live_abc123"`
+2. Try to edit protected file (should be blocked by Git hook)
+3. Try to repeat failed solution (should see FAILED in learnings.log)
+
+**Questions:**
+- Are mistakes prevented?
+- Are error messages clear?
+- What's missing?
+
+---
+
+### SCENARIO 4: Memory Usage Gap (Critical)
+**Test:** Developer sets preference, AI should see it automatically
+1. Add preference: `memorylink memory "When I say 'take control', proceed automatically" --type preference`
+2. Run `memorylink setup cursor`
+3. Check if `.cursorrules` was updated
+4. Check if `rules.md` was generated
+5. Check if `get-context` shows preference first
+
+**Questions:**
+- Does the preference auto-sync work?
+- Is it visible to AI automatically?
+- What's missing?
+
+---
+
+### SCENARIO 5: Team Collaboration
+**Test:** Two developers work on same project
+1. Developer A: `memorylink memory "Use JWT for auth" --tags auth`
+2. Developer A: `memorylink sync` (commits to Git)
+3. Developer B: `git pull`
+4. Developer B: `memorylink get-context --tag auth`
+5. Verify Developer B sees Developer A's memory
+
+**Questions:**
+- Does team sharing work?
+- Is Git sync smooth?
+- What's missing?
+
+---
+
+### SCENARIO 6: Error Recovery
+**Test:** Developer encounters errors
+1. Try to use MemoryLink without init (should show clear error)
+2. Try to add memory with invalid format (should show clear error)
+3. Run `memorylink doctor` (should diagnose issues)
+4. Check if troubleshooting guide helps
+
+**Questions:**
+- Are errors clear and actionable?
+- Does `doctor` help?
+- Does troubleshooting guide help?
+- What's missing?
+
+---
+
+### SCENARIO 7: Large Project Performance
+**Test:** Project with 100+ memory entries
+1. Add 100 memory entries
+2. Run `memorylink get-context --limit 10`
+3. Run `memorylink search "keyword"`
+4. Check performance
+
+**Questions:**
+- Is performance acceptable?
+- Does filtering work?
+- What's missing?
+
+---
+
+### SCENARIO 8: Code Snippet Storage
+**Test:** Developer stores code snippet
+1. Run: `memorylink snippet "Auth helper function" --file src/auth.ts --lines 42-50 --code "function auth() {...}" --language typescript`
+2. Run: `memorylink get-context`
+3. Verify code snippet appears
+4. Run: `memorylink search "auth"`
+5. Verify code snippet is searchable
+
+**Questions:**
+- Does code snippet storage work?
+- Is it useful?
+- What's missing?
+
+---
+
+## ❓ QUESTIONS FOR AI TESTERS
+
+### 1. Feature Completeness
+- **What features are missing that would prevent you from using MemoryLink?**
+- **What features would make you abandon it after trying?**
+- **Is v1.0 feature-complete for launch, or are there critical gaps?**
+
+### 2. Real-World Scenarios
+- **Test the 8 scenarios above. Do they all work?**
+- **What scenarios are missing from the test list?**
+- **What real-world problems would MemoryLink fail to solve?**
+
+### 3. Hard Testing
+- **What hard tests should I run? (edge cases, error conditions, performance)**
+- **What would break MemoryLink in production?**
+- **What would cause users to abandon it?**
+
+### 4. Missing Features
+- **What features are missing that you expected?**
+- **What would make MemoryLink 10x better?**
+- **What's the #1 missing feature that blocks adoption?**
+
+### 5. Error Handling
+- **Are error messages clear and actionable?**
+- **Does the troubleshooting guide help?**
+- **What errors would confuse users?**
+
+### 6. Documentation
+- **Is the Agent Contract clear?**
+- **Is the troubleshooting guide sufficient?**
+- **What documentation is missing?**
+
+### 7. UX/Workflow
+- **Is the workflow smooth?**
+- **Are there friction points?**
+- **What would make it easier to use?**
+
+### 8. Launch Readiness
+- **Is MemoryLink v1.0 ready to launch?**
+- **What MUST be fixed before launch?**
+- **What SHOULD be fixed before launch?**
+- **What CAN wait for v1.1?**
+
+---
+
+## 📊 WHAT I NEED FROM YOU
+
+**Please provide:**
+
+1. **Test Results:** Did all 8 scenarios work? What failed?
+2. **Gap Analysis:** What features are missing?
+3. **Hard Test Results:** What edge cases break it?
+4. **Launch Recommendation:** Ready to launch? YES/NO with reasoning
+5. **Priority List:** Top 5 things to fix/add before launch
+6. **Real-World Validation:** Would you use this? Why/why not?
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 TESTING FOCUS
+
+**Focus on:**
+- ✅ Does it actually work in real scenarios?
+- ✅ Are there any blockers?
+- ✅ What would cause user abandonment?
+- ✅ What's missing that's critical?
+
+**Don't focus on:**
+- ❌ Nice-to-have features (v1.1)
+- ❌ Advanced features (v1.5)
+- ❌ Theoretical improvements
+
+---
+
+## 📝 YOUR RESPONSE FORMAT
+
+Please structure your response as:
+
+```
+# MEMORYLINK v1.0 TESTING RESULTS
+
+## Test Results (8 Scenarios)
+1. New Developer Onboarding: [PASS/FAIL] - [Notes]
+2. Cross-AI Memory Sharing: [PASS/FAIL] - [Notes]
+3. Preventing Mistakes: [PASS/FAIL] - [Notes]
+4. Memory Usage Gap: [PASS/FAIL] - [Notes]
+5. Team Collaboration: [PASS/FAIL] - [Notes]
+6. Error Recovery: [PASS/FAIL] - [Notes]
+7. Large Project Performance: [PASS/FAIL] - [Notes]
+8. Code Snippet Storage: [PASS/FAIL] - [Notes]
+
+## Gap Analysis
+- Missing Features: [List]
+- Critical Gaps: [List]
+- Nice-to-Have: [List]
+
+## Hard Test Results
+- Edge Cases: [What breaks?]
+- Performance: [Issues?]
+- Error Conditions: [Problems?]
+
+## Launch Recommendation
+- Ready to Launch: [YES/NO]
+- Reasoning: [Why?]
+- Must Fix Before Launch: [List]
+- Should Fix Before Launch: [List]
+
+## Priority List
+1. [Top priority]
+2. [Second priority]
+3. [Third priority]
+4. [Fourth priority]
+5. [Fifth priority]
+
+## Real-World Validation
+- Would I Use This: [YES/NO]
+- Why: [Reasoning]
+- What Would Make Me Use It: [List]
+```
+
+---
+
+**Thank you for testing MemoryLink v1.0! Your feedback is critical before launch.**
+
+---
+
+**Last Updated:** December 13, 2025  
+**MemoryLink Version:** 1.0.0
+

package/docs/AI_VALIDATION_PROMPTS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+# 🤖 AI VALIDATION PROMPTS - PRE-LAUNCH CHECK
+
+## 🎯 PURPOSE
+
+Use these prompts to ask multiple AIs (Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen, Grok) to validate MemoryLink v1.0 and identify any missing features or gaps before launch.
+
+---
+
+## 📋 PROMPT 1: CRITICAL GAPS ANALYSIS
+
+**Copy this entire prompt and ask each AI:**
+
+```
+I'm about to launch MemoryLink v1.0, a universal memory layer for AI coding assistants. I need your help to identify any critical gaps before launch.
+
+WHAT MEMORYLINK v1.0 DOES:
+- Stores project decisions, learnings (SUCCESS/FAILED), and file changes
+- Works with ALL AIs (Cursor, Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, etc.) via text files
+- Team-shareable via Git
+- 12 CLI commands (init, memory, learn, change, protect, search, get-context, etc.)
+- JSONL format (memory.log, learnings.log, changes.log)
+- File protection (protected.txt + Git hooks)
+- Secret detection (27 patterns)
+- Smart filtering (--tag, --since, --limit)
+
+KNOWN GAPS (from our analysis):
+- No code snippet storage (only file references)
+- No full conversation storage (only summaries)
+- Manual logging only (no auto-logging)
+- CLI-only (no GUI)
+- No MCP server (deferred to v1.5)
+
+QUESTIONS:
+1. What CRITICAL features are missing that would prevent users from adopting MemoryLink v1.0?
+2. What are the top 5 gaps that would cause users to abandon it after trying it?
+3. Is v1.0 ready to launch, or are there critical gaps that MUST be fixed first?
+4. What minimum feature set is required for v1.0 to be considered "complete"?
+5. What would cause MemoryLink v1.0 to fail in the market?
+
+Please provide:
+- Critical gaps (MUST fix before launch) - be specific
+- Important gaps (should fix in v1.1-v1.3) - be specific
+- Nice-to-have gaps (can wait for v2.0) - be specific
+- Launch readiness: YES/NO with reasoning
+- Specific recommendations with examples
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📋 PROMPT 2: FEATURE COMPLETENESS CHECK
+
+**Copy this entire prompt and ask each AI:**
+
+```
+MemoryLink v1.0 is a development-focused memory system (not conversation-focused like mem0 or SuperMemory AI).
+
+CURRENT DATA TYPES:
+- Decisions (type: "decision")
+- Notes (type: "note")
+- Document references (type: "doc_ref" with path and hash)
+- Context (type: "context")
+- Rules (type: "rule")
+- Learnings (SUCCESS/FAILED in learnings.log)
+- Changes (file modifications in changes.log)
+
+QUESTIONS:
+1. What other types of data should MemoryLink store for development workflows?
+2. Should MemoryLink store full conversations (like mem0) or stay development-focused?
+3. Should MemoryLink store code snippets (with actual code, not just file references)?
+4. Should MemoryLink store project structure snapshots?
+5. Should MemoryLink track dependencies (npm packages, imports)?
+6. What data types are developers most likely to need that we're missing?
+
+Please provide:
+- Missing data types with use cases
+- Priority (Critical/Important/Nice-to-have)
+- Implementation suggestions
+- Examples of what the data should look like
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📋 PROMPT 3: USER EXPERIENCE GAPS
+
+**Copy this entire prompt and ask each AI:**
+
+```
+MemoryLink v1.0 is CLI-only with manual logging. Users must run commands like:
+- memorylink memory "Use JWT for auth"
+- memorylink learn "Database timeout" "Added index" --status SUCCESS
+- memorylink change src/api.ts "Added error handling"
+
+QUESTIONS:
+1. What UX improvements are CRITICAL for v1.0 launch success?
+2. Should MemoryLink have automatic logging (file watcher, Git hooks) or is manual OK?
+3. What documentation is missing that would prevent users from successfully using it?
+4. What error scenarios are not handled well?
+5. What would frustrate users the most about the current CLI-only approach?
+6. Should v1.0 have an interactive mode, or is command-line sufficient?
+
+Please provide:
+- Critical UX gaps (must fix before launch)
+- Important UX improvements (v1.1-v1.3)
+- Documentation gaps with specific topics
+- Error handling improvements
+- UX recommendations with examples
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📋 PROMPT 4: INTEGRATION GAPS
+
+**Copy this entire prompt and ask each AI:**
+
+```
+MemoryLink v1.0 works with all AIs via text files (.memorylink/ folder). Users manually:
+- Run CLI commands to add memories
+- Read .memorylink/ files in their AI tools
+- Share via Git
+
+INTEGRATIONS WE HAVE:
+- .cursorrules file (instructions for Cursor)
+- CLAUDE_INSTRUCTIONS.md (instructions for Claude)
+- CHATGPT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (instructions for ChatGPT)
+- .github/copilot-instructions.md (instructions for Copilot)
+
+INTEGRATIONS WE DON'T HAVE:
+- MCP server (deferred to v1.5)
+- VS Code extension (v2.0)
+- API server (v2.0)
+- Auto-injection (manual paste required)
+
+QUESTIONS:
+1. Is CLI + instruction files sufficient for v1.0, or do we need MCP/extension/API?
+2. What integrations are CRITICAL for launch success?
+3. How should MemoryLink handle team collaboration beyond Git sharing?
+4. Should MemoryLink have webhooks or other automation features?
+5. What would make MemoryLink easier to integrate with existing workflows?
+
+Please provide:
+- Critical integrations (must have before launch)
+- Important integrations (v1.1-v1.5)
+- Integration recommendations with examples
+- Team collaboration improvements
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📋 PROMPT 5: TECHNICAL GAPS
+
+**Copy this entire prompt and ask each AI:**
+
+```
+MemoryLink v1.0 uses:
+- JSONL files (one JSON object per line)
+- File locking (proper-lockfile)
+- Local filesystem (.memorylink/ folder)
+- No encryption (plain text)
+- No vector search (text-based only)
+
+QUESTIONS:
+1. What technical limitations exist with JSONL files that we should address?
+2. Are there scalability issues with large logs (10,000+ entries)?
+3. What security concerns exist with local plain-text files?
+4. Should MemoryLink have encryption, or is plain text acceptable?
+5. What performance issues might arise with concurrent operations?
+6. Should MemoryLink have vector search for semantic similarity, or is text search sufficient?
+
+Please provide:
+- Technical limitations with current approach
+- Scalability concerns and solutions
+- Security recommendations
+- Performance optimizations needed
+- Technical debt to address
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📋 PROMPT 6: COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
+
+**Copy this entire prompt and ask each AI:**
+
+```
+MemoryLink v1.0 competes with:
+- mem0 (Memory for AI) - Vector DB, full conversations
+- SuperMemory AI - Cloud DB, code snippets, project structure
+- LangChain Memory - Conversation buffer
+- LlamaIndex Memory - Document storage
+- Cursor AI - Session-based memory
+- ChatGPT/Claude - Cloud-based memory
+
+MEMORYLINK'S UNIQUE VALUE:
+- Universal (works with ALL AIs)
+- Local-first (Git-friendly)
+- Team-shareable (via Git)
+- Development-focused (decisions, learnings, changes)
+- Explicit learning (SUCCESS/FAILED tracking)
+- File protection
+
+QUESTIONS:
+1. What makes MemoryLink different enough that users would choose it?
+2. What features from competitors should MemoryLink adopt?
+3. What are MemoryLink's competitive advantages?
+4. What are MemoryLink's competitive weaknesses?
+5. How should MemoryLink position itself in the market?
+
+Please provide:
+- Competitive advantages (what we do better)
+- Competitive weaknesses (what we do worse)
+- Features to adopt from competitors
+- Market positioning recommendations
+- Differentiation strategy
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📋 PROMPT 7: LAUNCH READINESS
+
+**Copy this entire prompt and ask each AI:**
+
+```
+MemoryLink v1.0 is feature-complete for initial scope. Before launching, I need your assessment.
+
+CURRENT STATE:
+✅ 12 CLI commands implemented
+✅ JSONL storage with file locking
+✅ Secret detection (27 patterns)
+✅ File protection (protected.txt + Git hooks)
+✅ Smart filtering (--tag, --since, --limit)
+✅ AI integration files (.cursorrules, instructions)
+✅ Git-friendly (append-only logs)
+✅ Team sharing (via Git)
+✅ Documentation (README, examples, guides)
+✅ Migration tool (legacy format support)
+✅ Doctor command (health check)
+
+KNOWN LIMITATIONS:
+- Manual logging only (no auto-logging)
+- CLI-only (no GUI)
+- No code snippet storage
+- No full conversation storage
+- No MCP server
+- No vector search
+
+QUESTIONS:
+1. Is MemoryLink v1.0 ready to launch, or must we fix critical gaps first?
+2. What would cause v1.0 to fail in the market?
+3. What minimum feature set is required for v1.0 to be "complete"?
+4. Should we delay launch to add critical features, or ship now and iterate?
+5. What's the biggest risk of launching v1.0 as-is?
+
+Please provide:
+- Launch readiness: YES/NO with detailed reasoning
+- Critical blockers (must fix before launch)
+- Launch risks and mitigations
+- Recommended launch strategy
+- Post-launch priorities
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📋 PROMPT 8: END-TO-END VALIDATION
+
+**Copy this entire prompt and ask each AI:**
+
+```
+I need an end-to-end validation of MemoryLink v1.0. Please review everything and identify ANY gaps or missing features.
+
+REVIEW THESE AREAS:
+
+1. DATA STORAGE
+   - What data types are missing?
+   - What storage formats should we support?
+   - Are there data structure limitations?
+
+2. FUNCTIONALITY
+   - What operations are missing?
+   - What workflows are not supported?
+   - What edge cases are not handled?
+
+3. USER EXPERIENCE
+   - What UX improvements are needed?
+   - What documentation is missing?
+   - What error handling is inadequate?
+
+4. INTEGRATIONS
+   - What integrations are missing?
+   - What tools should we support?
+   - What automation is needed?
+
+5. TECHNICAL
+   - What technical limitations exist?
+   - What scalability issues might arise?
+   - What security concerns exist?
+
+6. COMPETITIVE
+   - What competitive features are missing?
+   - What market positioning issues exist?
+   - What differentiation gaps exist?
+
+7. LAUNCH READINESS
+   - Is v1.0 ready to launch?
+   - What must be fixed before launch?
+   - What are the biggest risks?
+
+Please provide a comprehensive analysis covering ALL areas above. Be specific, provide examples, and prioritize (Critical/Important/Nice-to-have).
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 HOW TO USE THESE PROMPTS
+
+### Step 1: Ask Each AI
+- Copy each prompt
+- Ask Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen, Grok
+- Collect all responses
+
+### Step 2: Analyze Responses
+- Identify common themes
+- Prioritize gaps (Critical/Important/Nice-to-have)
+- Create action plan
+
+### Step 3: Fix Critical Gaps
+- Address must-fix items before launch
+- Document important gaps for v1.1-v1.3
+- Plan nice-to-have for v2.0
+
+### Step 4: Re-validate
+- Ask AIs again after fixes
+- Confirm launch readiness
+- Get final approval
+
+---
+
+## 📊 RESPONSE TEMPLATE
+
+Create a document to collect all AI responses:
+
+```
+AI VALIDATION RESPONSES - MemoryLink v1.0
+
+AI: [Name]
+Date: [Date]
+Prompt: [Which prompt number]
+
+RESPONSE:
+[Paste full response]
+
+KEY FINDINGS:
+- Critical gaps: [List]
+- Important gaps: [List]
+- Nice-to-have: [List]
+- Launch readiness: [YES/NO with reasoning]
+
+---
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📅 Document History
+
+- **Created:** December 12, 2025
+- **Purpose:** AI validation prompts for pre-launch check
+- **Version:** 1.0.0
+- **Status:** Ready to use
+