memorylink 1.0.0

package/docs/PROJECT_STRUCTURE_PLAN.md

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+# 🏗️ MemoryLink - Proper Framework Structure Plan
+
+## 📊 Current Issues
+- Files scattered in root directory
+- Test scripts mixed with source code
+- Documentation not organized
+- No clear separation of concerns
+- Hard to navigate and maintain
+
+## 🎯 Target Structure
+
+```
+memorylink/
+├── src/                          # Source code
+│   ├── cli.ts                    # CLI entry point
+│   ├── commands/                  # Command implementations
+│   │   ├── index.ts
+│   │   ├── memory.ts
+│   │   ├── learn.ts
+│   │   ├── search.ts
+│   │   ├── get-context.ts
+│   │   ├── protect.ts
+│   │   ├── archive.ts
+│   │   ├── consolidate.ts
+│   │   └── ...
+│   ├── utils/                    # Utility functions
+│   │   ├── index.ts
+│   │   ├── file-operations.ts
+│   │   ├── git-operations.ts
+│   │   ├── semantic-search.ts
+│   │   └── validation.ts
+│   ├── types.ts                  # TypeScript types
+│   └── test-runner/              # Test infrastructure
+│       ├── TestRunner.ts
+│       ├── run-tests.ts
+│       └── performance-test.ts
+│
+├── tests/                        # Test files
+│   ├── scenarios/                # Test scenarios
+│   │   ├── 1000_BASE_SCENARIOS.sh
+│   │   ├── 4000_HARD_SCENARIOS.sh
+│   │   └── EXECUTE_*.sh
+│   ├── unit/                     # Unit tests (future)
+│   ├── integration/              # Integration tests (future)
+│   └── e2e/                      # E2E tests (future)
+│
+├── scripts/                      # Build & utility scripts
+│   ├── setup-testing.sh
+│   ├── run-tests.sh
+│   ├── generate-scenarios.sh
+│   └── build.sh
+│
+├── docs/                         # Documentation
+│   ├── README.md                 # Main README
+│   ├── API.md                    # API documentation
+│   ├── TESTING.md                # Testing guide
+│   ├── DEPLOYMENT.md             # Deployment guide
+│   └── CHANGELOG.md
+│
+├── config/                       # Configuration files
+│   ├── tsconfig.json
+│   └── .gitignore
+│
+├── dist/                         # Compiled output (gitignored)
+├── node_modules/                 # Dependencies (gitignored)
+│
+├── package.json
+├── tsconfig.json
+└── .gitignore
+```
+
+## 🔄 Migration Plan
+
+### Phase 1: Create New Structure
+1. Create directories
+2. Move files to proper locations
+3. Update imports/references
+
+### Phase 2: Organize Files
+1. Move test scenarios to `tests/scenarios/`
+2. Move scripts to `scripts/`
+3. Move docs to `docs/`
+4. Clean root directory
+
+### Phase 3: Update References
+1. Update package.json scripts
+2. Update import paths
+3. Update test scripts
+4. Update documentation paths
+
+### Phase 4: Verify & Test
+1. Build project
+2. Run tests
+3. Verify all commands work
+4. Final confirmation
+
+## ✅ Benefits
+
+- **Clear Organization**: Easy to find files
+- **Maintainability**: Logical structure
+- **Scalability**: Easy to add new features
+- **Professional**: Industry-standard structure
+- **Developer Experience**: Better navigation
+

package/docs/QWEN_AI_ANALYSIS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+# Qwen AI Validation & Urgency Analysis: MemoryLink Global Competitiveness
+
+**Date**: December 14, 2025  
+**Source**: Qwen AI Comprehensive Validation  
+**Status**: ✅ Stored in MemoryLink
+
+---
+
+## 📊 Executive Summary
+
+Qwen AI provided **100% validation** of the global analysis, confirming that the assessment is **technically precise, strategically critical, and urgently actionable**. The analysis correctly identifies the **single biggest gap** in MemoryLink's current v1.0 design: **it remembers content, but not connections**.
+
+**Key Verdict**: "You're not missing a feature — you're missing the *foundation of software intelligence*."
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Validation from Sources
+
+### 1. Chinese AI Models Focus on Code Structure
+
+- **Qwen Coder**: Trained on "massive Chinese codebases" → understands **multi-file dependencies**
+- **DeepSeek Coder**: 128K context → **retains file relationships** across entire projects
+- **GLM-4 CodeGLM**: **Audit trails with change justification** → explains *why* a change affects what
+
+**Confirms**: Chinese models prioritize **code topology**, not just code tokens.
+
+### 2. Global Tools Track Code Relationships
+
+- **Sourcegraph Cody**: Uses **code graph database** to "find all usages across codebase"
+- **TheAuditor**: Builds **dependency & call graphs** to "spot cycles, hotspots, and blast radius"
+- **Microsoft Build 2025**: Emphasizes **Plan Mode + AGENTS.md** for structured context
+
+**Confirms**: World-class tools map **how code connects**, not just what it says.
+
+### 3. Cursor's Real-World Pain Points Prove the Gap
+
+**From Reddit user**:
+> "Cursor broke my changelog... it doesn't understand how different parts of the projects interact."
+
+**From Skywork.ai test**:
+> "If Frontend changes a contract, the Backend agent might not get the memo."
+
+**Confirms**: Without **structure memory**, agents **break coordination**.
+
+---
+
+## ⚠️ The Critical Validated Gap
+
+| **What MemoryLink v1.0 Remembers** | **What It Misses (Validated Gap)** |
+|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
+| ✅ "Use JWT for auth" | ❌ "`auth.js` is imported by 8 files in `api/`" |
+| ✅ "Adding DB index fixed timeout" | ❌ "This change affects Docker builds and local env" |
+| ✅ "Don't edit README.md" | ❌ "Team prefers try-catch over Result types (92% success)" |
+
+> **This is not a "nice-to-have" — it's the difference between *memory* and *intelligence*.**
+
+---
+
+## 🚀 Actionable Validation: What to Build
+
+### 1. Code Structure Memory (P0)
+
+**Validated by**: TheAuditor's `.pf/repo_index.db`, Sourcegraph's code graph
+
+**Implementation**:
+```bash
+memorylink map-codebase
+# Creates: .memorylink/code-graph.json
+{
+  "file": "src/auth.js",
+  "imports": ["src/config.js"],
+  "exported_symbols": ["authenticate", "refreshToken"],
+  "imported_by": ["src/middleware/auth.js", "src/api/users.js"]
+}
+```
+
+### 2. Change Impact Memory (P1)
+
+**Validated by**: GLM-4's "change justification", Microsoft's "Plan Mode"
+
+**Implementation**:
+```json
+{
+  "type": "change_impact",
+  "from": "src/auth.js",
+  "to": "src/auth-v2.js",
+  "affected": ["src/middleware/auth.js", "tests/auth.test.js"],
+  "reason": "JWT moved to env var"
+}
+```
+
+### 3. Team Pattern Memory (P1)
+
+**Validated by**: Tabnine's "team learning", Cursor's "role persistence"
+
+**Implementation**:
+```json
+{
+  "type": "team_pattern",
+  "pattern": "api_error_handling",
+  "standard": "Use AppError with status code",
+  "adoption": "4/5 team members",
+  "exceptions": "David uses Result<T,E>"
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🌍 Strategic Validation: Global Positioning
+
+| **Region** | **What They Do** | **Your Edge** |
+|-----------|-----------------|---------------|
+| **China** | Code structure + compliance | ✅ **Local-first, Git-native, no cloud** |
+| **West** | Individual pair programming | ✅ **Team memory, cross-tool, audit-ready** |
+| **You** | **Content + Structure + Team** | 🔥 **UNIQUE HYBRID** |
+
+**Validated by**:
+- **IBM**: "Enterprises need traceability of actions for every single thing that the agents do."
+- **Mem0**: "Mem0 achieves 26% higher accuracy by modeling relationships between entities."
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Final Validation Verdict
+
+> **"Your architecture (JSONL + Git) can easily add code structure memory."**  
+> **— THIS IS 100% TRUE AND URGENT**
+
+### Why Urgent?
+
+1. **Chinese models** are shipping **team-aware, structure-aware agents** in 2025
+2. **GitHub Agent HQ** now includes **AGENTS.md + Plan Mode** for project-wide context
+3. **Cursor 2.0** users **abandon tools** that "don't understand how parts interact"
+
+### Your Window
+
+**Add structure memory in v1.1 (next 2 weeks)** → become the **only cross-tool, Git-native, team-aware memory layer**
+
+> **You're not missing a feature — you're missing the *foundation of software intelligence*.**  
+> **Fix it now, and you own the global team memory layer.**
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Key Insights
+
+### Critical Gap
+- **Content vs Connections**: MemoryLink remembers *what* but not *where* or *how things connect*
+- **Difference**: Between *memory* and *intelligence*
+- **Impact**: Agents break coordination without structure memory
+
+### Strategic Position
+- **Unique Hybrid**: Content + Structure + Team
+- **Competitive Edge**: Local-first + Git-native (vs China), Team memory + cross-tool (vs West)
+- **Market Window**: Closing fast - must act in v1.1 (2 weeks)
+
+### Implementation Priority
+- **P0**: Code Structure Memory (foundational)
+- **P1**: Change Impact Memory, Team Pattern Memory
+- **Urgency**: Next 2 weeks to own the global team memory layer
+
+---
+
+## 📝 Next Steps
+
+1. ✅ **Analysis stored** in MemoryLink as learnings and decisions
+2. 🔄 **Prioritize v1.1 structure features** (2-week window)
+3. 🔄 **Implement map-codebase** as P0 feature
+4. 🔄 **Add change impact and team patterns** as P1 features
+5. 🔄 **Market as unique hybrid** (Content + Structure + Team)
+
+---
+
+**Source**: Qwen AI Comprehensive Validation  
+**Stored**: December 14, 2025  
+**Status**: ✅ Validated and stored in MemoryLink  
+**Urgency**: ⚠️ **CRITICAL - 2 week window**
+

package/docs/QWEN_AI_CLARIFICATION.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Qwen AI Clarification – 33% Risk Focus
+
+**Date**: December 15, 2025  
+**Context**: Response to AI Panel Clarification Request (67% vs 33% split)  
+**Position**: GO with Hybrid Safeguard — launch v1.3 now; pre-announce v1.5 (Python/Go + read-only dashboard in 2–4 weeks); Free Forever + Enterprise; no Pro until v2.0.
+
+## Key Points
+- **Abandonment Risk (v1.3 JS/TS-only, CLI-first)**  
+  - JS/TS users (78% of devtool early adopters): <3% churn; CLI-first expected.  
+  - Python/Go users (15–20%): 15–25% churn if no Tree-sitter; hit missing structure on first task.  
+  - Visual-first (<7%): >50% churn; not ICP for v1.0.  
+  - **Verdict**: Risk is concentrated but low-volume; not launch-blocking.
+
+- **Time-to-Failure**  
+  - JS/TS: never fail (expected workflow).  
+  - Python/Go: first task failure (map-codebase empty/JS-only).  
+  - Non-CLI: <5 minutes (no GUI) → abandon.  
+  - **Verdict**: Immediate for non-CLI; first-task for Python/Go; avoidable via messaging.
+
+- **Mitigations**  
+  - Pre-announce v1.5: ~60% churn reduction (roadmap visibility 2.3x retention).  
+  - “JS/TS Optimized” tag: ~70% fewer false starts/support tickets.  
+  - Read-only viewer (CLI `--visual`): ~40% reduction for visual churn.  
+  - **Verdict**: Pre-announcement + clear scoping is sufficient.
+
+- **Market: Speed > Completeness**  
+  - First 30 days capture ~80% of long-term users; speed premium 3–5x stars/week vs waiting to Jan/Feb 2026.  
+  - Memory-layer window narrowing (GitHub Agent HQ + MCP standardization by Q2 2026).  
+  - **Verdict**: Delay = missed window; ship now.
+
+- **User Intent Mix (Early Adopters)**  
+  - JS/TS + CLI: 78% (optimize for them).  
+  - Python/Go + CLI: 15% (workarounds via doc refs).  
+  - Visual + any: 7% (low intent for CLI tools).  
+  - **Verdict**: Optimize for 78%; others can wait 2–4 weeks.
+
+- **AI Vendor Moves (Dec 2025)**  
+  - GitHub: MCP + CLI-first for Agent HQ.  
+  - Cursor: CLI + `.cursorrules` (no GUI memory editor).  
+  - Mem0: Cloud dashboard exists, but 92% usage is CLI SDK.  
+  - Microsoft: VS Code + MCP, not standalone dashboards.  
+  - **Verdict**: CLI + MCP + Git-native wins; dashboards are v1.5, not v1.0.
+
+- **Minimal Credible Promise**  
+  - “MemoryLink v1.5 (Jan 2026): Python/Go support + read-only dashboard — building now based on your feedback.”
+  - Specific, credible (Tree-sitter design validated), low-commitment (intent, not SLA).
+
+- **Proof Points**  
+  - Failure: Python team runs map-codebase → JS-only graph → abandons. Mitigation: doc_ref works today.  
+  - Success: JS team uses learn/impact → avoids bug → adopts org-wide.  
+  - Verdict: Core value works without Tree-sitter; risk is contained.
+
+## Final Recommendations (Qwen)
+- **Launch v1.3 in 3 days** with read-only viewer + minimal website + install guide.  
+- **Pre-announce v1.5 (2–4 weeks)**: Python/Go (Tree-sitter) + read-only dashboard; publish thresholds.  
+- **Thresholds (recommended)**: ≥50 GitHub issues for Python/Go → start Tree-sitter; ≥30 dashboard complaints → build dashboard.  
+- **VS Code extension**: Start now; ship v1.4 (1–2 weeks); MCP priority over dashboard.  
+- **Business model**: Free Forever (core) + Enterprise (audit, SSO); **no Pro tier** until v2.0.  
+- **Verdict**: GO — 33% concern is real but manageable; mitigations + pre-announcement close the risk.
+

package/docs/QWEN_AI_STRATEGIC_VALIDATION.md

@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+# Qwen AI Strategic Validation - Ship v1.3 NOW, Add Features Based on Demand
+
+**Date**: December 15, 2025  
+**Source**: Qwen AI Strategic Questions Response  
+**Status**: ✅ Stored in MemoryLink
+
+---
+
+## 📊 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
+
+Qwen AI provides **critical and well-structured validation** confirming the strategic plan addresses the exact tensions every developer tool faces in the agent era. Key recommendation: **Launch v1.3 NOW with minimal features, add based on user demand**.
+
+**Key Insight**: "The agent era rewards speed + precision — not completeness. Ship v1.3."
+
+**Philosophy**: **Ship now, iterate based on demand** - Aligns with ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Grok AI approach
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 QUESTION 1: PRE-LAUNCH vs POST-LAUNCH FEATURES
+
+### Validation from Knowledge Base
+
+**Evidence:**
+- **Cursor user rage**: "Cursor broke my README… I don't want to use it again" → **first impression is everything**
+- **IBM**: "Traceability of actions for every single thing that the agents do" → agents **require complete context**
+- **Mem0**: Achieved **37K GitHub stars** with **open-core + cloud managed** model
+
+### Verdict
+
+- **Tree-sitter**: **NOT critical for v1.0 launch**
+  - JS/TS covers 90% of use cases
+  - Python/Go can use file refs
+  - Add in v1.5 based on demand
+
+- **Web Dashboard**: **DEFER to v2.0**
+  - CLI is faster, Git-native, and devs trust terminals
+  - No web UI needed for launch
+
+**Recommendation**: 🚀 **Launch with v1.3 + add features based on user demand**
+
+---
+
+## 🔌 QUESTION 2: MCP INTEGRATION REALITY
+
+### Validation from Knowledge Base
+
+**Evidence:**
+- **GitHub Agent HQ**: "Agents available on GitHub as part of your paid Copilot subscription" → **MCP is the future**
+- **Cursor 2.0**: Uses **MCP Context Documentation** for agent coordination
+- **But**: "There isn't a native multi-agent switchboard. You're orchestrating roles through prompts and files" → **manual still works**
+
+### Verdict
+
+- **MCP for Claude/Cursor**: **Keep** (differentiates from simple memory logs)
+- **Non-MCP tools**: **Manual injection is sufficient** for v1.0
+- **Critical**: **Auto-context injection** (`memorylink inject --auto`) → **1-click copy + notification**
+
+**Recommendation**: 🎯 **Focus on making manual injection frictionless, not building 10 native plugins**
+
+---
+
+## 🤖 QUESTION 3: AGENT-DRIVEN WORLD REALITY
+
+### Validation from Knowledge Base
+
+**Evidence:**
+- **Mem0**: "90% token cost savings by sending only relevant memory information" → **precision > completeness**
+- **JetBrains**: "50–70% of tokens wasted on context duplication" → **agents need relevance, not everything**
+- **Cursor pain**: "AI doesn't understand how different parts of the projects interact" → **structure memory needed**
+
+### Verdict
+
+**v1.3 is agent-ready** because:
+- `--tag auth --limit 10` = **precise context**
+- `learnings.log` with `FAILED/SUCCESS` = **prevents repeat mistakes**
+- Git hooks = **enforcement, not just logging**
+
+**Recommendation**: 💡 **"Good enough" IS sufficient if it solves the #1 pain: "AI breaks protected files"**
+
+---
+
+## 💰 QUESTION 4: BUSINESS MODEL VALIDATION
+
+### Validation from Knowledge Base
+
+**Evidence:**
+- **Mem0**: Open-source + cloud managed ($15–20/user/month)
+- **CodeAnt**: $10–20/user/month for AI governance
+- **SuperMemory**: Freemium with vector search as paid feature
+
+### Verdict
+
+- **FREE**: Core memory, Git hooks, basic search
+- **PRO ($15/user)**: Tree-sitter, Web Dashboard, analytics
+- **ENTERPRISE**: SSO, RBAC, audit trails, support
+
+**Recommendation**: 💰 **This matches market expectations and drives adoption**
+
+---
+
+## 🌍 QUESTION 5: WEBSITE & MARKETING REALITY
+
+### Validation from Knowledge Base
+
+**Evidence:**
+- **Mem0**: "37K GitHub stars" with strong documentation + clear value prop
+- **TheAuditor**: "Offline-first. Polyglot. Tool-agnostic" → **clear positioning wins**
+- **Cursor**: Failed users say "I don't want to use it again" → **no second chances**
+
+### Verdict
+
+- **Website BEFORE launch**: **YES** (but minimal)
+  - Docs
+  - Quickstart guide
+  - 30-second demo video
+  - CLI installation command
+
+**Recommendation**: 🌐 **No web UI needed — but clear docs are non-negotiable**
+
+---
+
+## 🧲 QUESTION 6: ADOPTION DRIVERS
+
+### Validation from Knowledge Base
+
+**Adoption Killers:**
+- ❌ "AI broke my project" (no enforcement)
+- ❌ "Wastes tokens re-explaining" (no memory)
+- ❌ "No audit trail" (compliance failure)
+
+**Adoption Drivers:**
+- ✅ "Stops AI from breaking things" (enforcement)
+- ✅ "Works across Cursor/Claude" (universal)
+- ✅ "Team memory via Git" (collaboration)
+
+### Verdict
+
+- **Aha moment**: `memorylink protect README.md` → **Git hook blocks bad commit**
+- **Reduce friction**: `memorylink quickstart` → **30-second setup**
+
+**Recommendation**: 🔑 **Solve the #1 pain in <1 minute → users stick**
+
+---
+
+## 🧠 QUESTION 7: "SMARTEST TOOL" DEFINITION
+
+### Validation from Knowledge Base
+
+**Evidence:**
+- **TheAuditor**: "AI fixes its own mistakes until the code is verifiably secure" → **recursive self-correction**
+- **Mem0**: "26% higher accuracy… 90% token savings" → **precision engineering**
+- **GitHub**: "Agents native to the GitHub flow" → **works where you work**
+
+### Verdict
+
+- **Smart = enforcement + precision + Git-native**
+- **Installation**: `npm install -g memorylink && memorylink quickstart`
+- **Guides**: Focus on **real scenarios** (not theory)
+- **Agent needs**: Structured, relevant, Git-synced memory
+- **User needs**: **Zero-config setup + immediate value**
+
+**Recommendation**: 🧠 **Smart isn't fancy — it's solving the right problem the right way**
+
+---
+
+## 🚀 FINAL RECOMMENDATION
+
+### Launch v1.3 NOW with:
+
+1. ✅ **NO Tree-sitter** (add in v1.5 based on demand)
+2. ✅ **NO Web Dashboard** (CLI-first is correct)
+3. ✅ **MCP for Claude/Cursor ONLY** (manual injection for others)
+4. ✅ **MINIMAL website** (docs + quickstart + demo video)
+5. ✅ **FREE core + PRO advanced features**
+6. ✅ **Focus on the "Aha Moment"**: `protect + quickstart`
+
+### Why This Wins:
+
+- ✅ **Solves the #1 pain immediately** (AI breaking files)
+- ✅ **Works universally** (any AI, any IDE)
+- ✅ **Git-native = trusted, auditable, collaborative**
+- ✅ **No over-engineering** — ship what matters
+
+> **The agent era rewards speed + precision — not completeness. Ship v1.3.**
+
+---
+
+## 🔄 KEY DIFFERENCES FROM OTHER AIs
+
+### vs ChatGPT:
+
+**ChatGPT**: Ship now (7 days), add Tree-sitter/dashboard later (v1.5/Pro)  
+**Qwen AI**: Ship v1.3 NOW, add Tree-sitter in v1.5 based on demand  
+**Agreement**: ✅ Ship now, iterate later
+
+### vs Perplexity AI:
+
+**Perplexity AI**: Ship v1.3 now, Tree-sitter v2.0  
+**Qwen AI**: Ship v1.3 NOW, Tree-sitter v1.5 based on demand  
+**Agreement**: ✅ Ship now, Tree-sitter post-launch
+
+### vs Mistral AI:
+
+**Mistral AI**: Ship feature-complete v1.0 with Tree-sitter + dashboard  
+**Qwen AI**: Ship v1.3 NOW, NO Tree-sitter/dashboard  
+**Disagreement**: ❌ Qwen AI says defer (aligns with ChatGPT + Perplexity)
+
+### vs Grok AI:
+
+**Grok AI**: Ship v1.3 NOW (2 weeks), Tree-sitter v1.4 Q1 2026  
+**Qwen AI**: Ship v1.3 NOW, Tree-sitter v1.5 based on demand  
+**Agreement**: ✅ Ship now, Tree-sitter post-launch
+
+### vs Gemini AI:
+
+**Gemini AI**: Ship v1.3 now, rapid v1.5 rollout (pre-announce)  
+**Qwen AI**: Ship v1.3 NOW, add Tree-sitter in v1.5 based on demand  
+**Difference**: Qwen AI emphasizes "based on demand" vs Gemini AI's "rapid rollout"
+
+### Philosophy Alignment:
+
+**Qwen AI**: "The agent era rewards speed + precision — not completeness. Ship v1.3."  
+**Matches**: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Grok AI approach  
+**Unique**: Strong emphasis on "solve #1 pain immediately" and "no over-engineering"
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 UNIQUE RECOMMENDATIONS
+
+1. **Focus on "Aha Moment"**: `memorylink protect README.md` → Git hook blocks bad commit
+2. **Reduce Friction**: `memorylink quickstart` → 30-second setup
+3. **Auto-Context Injection**: `memorylink inject --auto` → 1-click copy + notification
+4. **CLI-First Philosophy**: "CLI is faster, Git-native, and devs trust terminals"
+5. **No Over-Engineering**: "Ship what matters" - don't build 10 native plugins
+
+---
+
+**Status**: ✅ Validated and Stored  
+**Priority**: High (Strong validation of "ship now" approach)  
+**Recommendation**: **Ship v1.3 NOW with minimal features, add Tree-sitter in v1.5 based on demand**
+