arckit-cli 6.1.1__py3-none-any.whl

arckit_cli-6.1.1.data/data/share/arckit/.arckit/templates/architecture-principles-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,632 @@
+# [ORGANIZATION_NAME] Enterprise Architecture Principles
+
+> **Template Origin**: Official | **ArcKit Version**: [VERSION] | **Command**: `/arckit:principles`
+
+## Document Control
+
+<!-- DOC-CONTROL-HEADER -->
+<!-- Resolved at command-execution time to _partials/document-control-uk.md or _partials/document-control-uae.md based on plugin userConfig classification_scheme + governance_framework. See _partials/RENDERING.md (when present). -->
+
+## Revision History
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approved By | Approval Date |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|-------------|---------------|
+| [VERSION] | [DATE] | ArcKit AI | Initial creation from `/arckit:principles` command | PENDING | PENDING |
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+This document establishes the immutable principles governing all technology architecture decisions at [ORGANIZATION_NAME]. These principles ensure consistency, security, scalability, and alignment with business strategy across all projects and initiatives.
+
+**Scope**: All technology projects, systems, and initiatives
+**Authority**: Enterprise Architecture Review Board
+**Compliance**: Mandatory unless exception approved by CTO/CIO
+
+**Philosophy**: These principles are **technology-agnostic** - they describe WHAT qualities the architecture must have, not HOW to implement them with specific products. Technology selection happens during research and design phases guided by these principles.
+
+---
+
+## I. Strategic Principles
+
+### 1. Scalability and Elasticity
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+All systems MUST be designed to scale horizontally to meet demand, with the ability to dynamically adjust capacity based on load.
+
+**Rationale**:
+Business demand is unpredictable and variable. Systems must handle both growth and traffic spikes without manual intervention or architectural changes.
+
+**Implications**:
+
+- Design for stateless components that can be replicated
+- Avoid hard-coded limits or fixed capacity assumptions
+- Plan for distributed deployment across multiple compute nodes
+- Use load balancing to distribute traffic across instances
+- Implement auto-scaling based on demand metrics
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] System can scale horizontally (add more instances)
+- [ ] No single points of failure that limit scaling
+- [ ] Load testing demonstrates capacity growth with added resources
+- [ ] Scaling metrics and triggers defined
+- [ ] Cost model accounts for variable capacity
+
+---
+
+### 2. Resilience and Fault Tolerance
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+All systems MUST gracefully degrade when dependencies fail and recover automatically without data loss or manual intervention.
+
+**Rationale**:
+Failures are inevitable in distributed systems. The architecture must assume failures will occur and design for resilience rather than perfect reliability.
+
+**Implications**:
+
+- Implement circuit breakers for external dependencies
+- Use timeouts on all network calls
+- Retry with exponential backoff for transient failures
+- Graceful degradation when non-critical services fail
+- Automated health checks and recovery
+- Avoid cascading failures through bulkhead isolation
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Failure modes identified and mitigated
+- [ ] Chaos engineering or fault injection testing performed
+- [ ] Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) defined
+- [ ] Automated failover tested
+- [ ] Degraded mode behavior documented
+
+---
+
+### 3. Interoperability and Integration
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+All systems MUST expose functionality through well-defined, versioned interfaces using industry-standard protocols. Direct database access across system boundaries is prohibited.
+
+**Rationale**:
+Loose coupling through standard interfaces enables independent evolution, technology diversity, and system composability.
+
+**Implications**:
+
+- Use standardized protocols (HTTP REST, GraphQL, message queuing, event streaming)
+- Version all interfaces with backward compatibility strategy
+- Publish interface specifications (API contracts, event schemas)
+- No direct database access across system boundaries
+- Asynchronous communication for non-real-time interactions
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Interface specifications published (OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, GraphQL schema)
+- [ ] Versioning strategy defined
+- [ ] Authentication and authorization model documented
+- [ ] Error handling and retry behavior specified
+- [ ] No direct database coupling across systems
+
+---
+
+### 4. Security by Design (NON-NEGOTIABLE)
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+All architectures MUST implement defense-in-depth security with zero-trust principles. Security is NOT a feature to be added later—it is a foundational requirement.
+
+**Rationale**:
+The threat landscape requires assuming breach, eliminating implicit trust, and continuously verifying all access requests.
+
+**Zero Trust Pillars**:
+
+1. **Identity-Based Access**: No network-based trust; every request authenticated
+2. **Least Privilege**: Grant minimum necessary permissions, time-boxed where possible
+3. **Encryption Everywhere**: Data encrypted in transit and at rest
+4. **Continuous Verification**: Monitor, log, and analyze all access patterns
+
+**Mandatory Controls**:
+
+- [ ] Multi-factor authentication for all human access
+- [ ] Service-to-service authentication (mutual TLS, signed tokens, or equivalent)
+- [ ] Secrets management via secure vault (never in code or config files)
+- [ ] Network segmentation with minimal trust zones
+- [ ] Encryption at rest for all data stores
+- [ ] Encrypted transport for all network communication
+- [ ] Structured logging of all authentication/authorization events
+- [ ] Regular security testing (penetration testing, vulnerability scanning)
+
+**Compliance Frameworks**:
+
+- [NIST Cybersecurity Framework | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II | CIS Controls]
+- [GDPR | HIPAA | PCI-DSS | FedRAMP] (if applicable)
+
+**Exceptions**:
+
+- NONE. Security principles are non-negotiable.
+- Specific control implementations may vary with compensating controls.
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Threat model completed and reviewed
+- [ ] Security controls mapped to requirements
+- [ ] Security testing plan defined
+- [ ] Incident response runbook created
+
+---
+
+### 5. Observability and Operational Excellence
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+All systems MUST emit structured telemetry (logs, metrics, traces) enabling real-time monitoring, troubleshooting, and capacity planning.
+
+**Rationale**:
+We cannot operate what we cannot observe. Instrumentation is a first-class architectural requirement, not an afterthought.
+
+**Telemetry Requirements**:
+
+- **Logging**: Structured logs with correlation IDs
+- **Metrics**: Request volume, latency percentiles (p50, p95, p99), error rates
+- **Tracing**: Distributed trace context for request flows
+- **Alerting**: Service Level Objective (SLO)-based alerting with actionable runbooks
+
+**Required Instrumentation**:
+
+- Request volume, latency distribution, error rate
+- Resource utilization (CPU, memory, I/O, network)
+- Business metrics (transactions, revenue impact, user actions)
+- Security events (auth failures, policy violations, suspicious patterns)
+
+**Log Retention**:
+
+- **Security/audit logs**: As required by compliance (typically 1-7 years)
+- **Application logs**: Sufficient for troubleshooting (typically 30-90 days)
+- **Metrics**: Long-term trends (typically 1-2 years with aggregation)
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Logging, metrics, tracing instrumented
+- [ ] Dashboards and alerts configured
+- [ ] Service Level Objectives (SLOs) and Service Level Indicators (SLIs) defined
+- [ ] Runbooks created for common failure scenarios
+- [ ] Capacity planning metrics tracked
+
+---
+
+## II. Data Principles
+
+### 6. Data Sovereignty and Governance
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+Data classification, residency, retention, and access controls MUST comply with regulatory requirements and corporate data governance policies.
+
+**Data Classification Tiers**:
+
+1. **Public**: No restrictions (marketing content, public documentation)
+2. **Internal**: Employee-only access (internal documents, non-sensitive data)
+3. **Confidential**: Need-to-know basis (financial data, PII, business secrets)
+4. **Restricted**: Highest controls (regulated data: PHI, payment cards, classified information)
+
+**Data Residency**:
+
+- Personal data must reside in jurisdictions compliant with applicable regulations
+- Cross-border data transfers require legal basis (adequacy decisions, standard contractual clauses)
+- Regulatory requirements (GDPR, CCPA, sector-specific) dictate storage locations
+
+**Data Retention**:
+
+- Automatic deletion after defined retention period
+- Legal hold process for litigation/investigation
+- Backup retention aligned with compliance and recovery requirements
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Data classification performed for all data stores
+- [ ] Residency requirements mapped to infrastructure
+- [ ] Retention policies configured with automated deletion
+- [ ] Access controls enforce least privilege and need-to-know
+
+---
+
+### 7. Data Quality and Lineage
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+Data pipelines MUST maintain data quality standards and provide end-to-end lineage for auditability and troubleshooting.
+
+**Quality Standards**:
+
+- **Completeness**: No unexpected nulls in required fields
+- **Consistency**: Cross-system data reconciliation
+- **Accuracy**: Validation rules and constraints enforced at source
+- **Timeliness**: Freshness Service Level Agreements (SLAs) defined and monitored
+
+**Lineage Requirements**:
+
+- Source-to-target mapping documented for all data flows
+- Transformation logic version-controlled and reviewable
+- Data quality metrics tracked per pipeline
+- Impact analysis capability for schema changes
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Data quality rules defined and automated
+- [ ] Lineage metadata captured and queryable
+- [ ] Data contracts between producers and consumers
+- [ ] Schema evolution strategy documented
+
+---
+
+### 8. Single Source of Truth
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+Every data domain MUST have a single authoritative source. Derived copies must be clearly labeled and synchronized.
+
+**Rationale**:
+Multiple authoritative sources create inconsistency, reconciliation overhead, and data integrity issues.
+
+**Implications**:
+
+- Identify the system of record for each data domain
+- Derived/cached copies are read-only and clearly labeled as such
+- Synchronization strategy defined for all derived copies
+- Avoid bidirectional synchronization (creates split-brain scenarios)
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] System of record identified for each data entity
+- [ ] Derived copies documented with sync frequency
+- [ ] No bidirectional sync without conflict resolution strategy
+- [ ] Master data management (MDM) strategy for shared reference data
+
+---
+
+## III. Integration Principles
+
+### 9. Loose Coupling
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+Systems MUST be loosely coupled through published interfaces, avoiding shared databases, file systems, or tight runtime dependencies.
+
+**Rationale**:
+Loose coupling enables independent deployment, technology diversity, team autonomy, and system evolution without breaking dependencies.
+
+**Implications**:
+
+- Communicate through published APIs or asynchronous events
+- No direct database access across system boundaries
+- Each system manages its own data lifecycle
+- Shared libraries kept minimal (favor duplication over coupling)
+- Avoid distributed transactions across systems
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Systems communicate via APIs or events, not database
+- [ ] No shared mutable state
+- [ ] Each system has independent data store
+- [ ] Deployment of one system doesn't require deployment of another
+- [ ] Interface changes versioned with backward compatibility
+
+---
+
+### 10. Asynchronous Communication
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+Systems SHOULD use asynchronous communication for non-real-time interactions to improve resilience and decoupling.
+
+**Rationale**:
+Asynchronous patterns reduce temporal coupling, improve fault tolerance, and enable better scalability.
+
+**When to Use Async**:
+
+- Non-real-time business processes (order fulfillment, batch jobs)
+- Event notification and pub/sub patterns
+- Long-running operations that don't require immediate response
+- Integration with unreliable or slow external systems
+
+**When Synchronous is Acceptable**:
+
+- Real-time user interactions requiring immediate feedback
+- Query operations (read-only, idempotent)
+- Transactions requiring immediate consistency
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Async patterns used for non-real-time flows
+- [ ] Message durability and delivery guarantees defined
+- [ ] Event schemas versioned and published
+- [ ] Dead letter queues and error handling configured
+
+---
+
+## IV. Quality Attributes
+
+### 11. Performance and Efficiency
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+All systems MUST meet defined performance targets under expected load with efficient use of computational resources.
+
+**Performance Targets** (define for each system):
+
+- **Response Time**: p50, p95, p99 latency targets
+- **Throughput**: Requests per second, transactions per minute
+- **Concurrency**: Simultaneous user/request capacity
+- **Resource Efficiency**: CPU/memory utilization targets
+
+**Implications**:
+
+- Performance requirements defined before implementation
+- Load testing performed before production deployment
+- Performance monitoring continuous, not just point-in-time
+- Optimize hot paths identified through profiling
+- Caching strategies for expensive operations
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Performance requirements defined with measurable targets
+- [ ] Load testing performed at expected capacity
+- [ ] Performance metrics monitored in production
+- [ ] Capacity planning model defined
+
+---
+
+### 12. Availability and Reliability
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+All systems MUST meet defined availability targets with automated recovery and minimal data loss.
+
+**Availability Targets** (define for each system):
+
+- **Uptime SLA**: e.g., 99.9% (43.8 min downtime/month), 99.95%, 99.99%
+- **Recovery Time Objective (RTO)**: Maximum acceptable downtime
+- **Recovery Point Objective (RPO)**: Maximum acceptable data loss
+
+**High Availability Patterns**:
+
+- Redundancy across availability zones / data centers
+- Automated health checks and failover
+- Active-active or active-passive configurations
+- Regular disaster recovery testing
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Availability SLA defined
+- [ ] RTO and RPO requirements documented
+- [ ] Redundancy strategy implemented
+- [ ] Failover tested regularly
+- [ ] Backup and restore procedures validated
+
+---
+
+### 13. Maintainability and Evolvability
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+All systems MUST be designed for change, with clear separation of concerns, modular architecture, and comprehensive documentation.
+
+**Rationale**:
+Software spends most of its lifetime in maintenance. Design decisions should optimize for understandability and modifiability.
+
+**Implications**:
+
+- Modular architecture with clear boundaries
+- Separation of concerns (business logic, data access, presentation)
+- Code is self-documenting with meaningful names
+- Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for significant choices
+- Automated testing to enable confident refactoring
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Architecture documentation exists and is current
+- [ ] Module boundaries clear with defined responsibilities
+- [ ] Automated test coverage enables safe refactoring
+- [ ] Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) document key choices
+
+---
+
+## V. Development Practices
+
+### 14. Infrastructure as Code
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+All infrastructure MUST be defined as code, version-controlled, and deployed through automated pipelines.
+
+**Rationale**:
+Manual infrastructure changes create drift, inconsistency, and undocumented state. Infrastructure as Code (IaC) enables repeatability, auditability, and disaster recovery.
+
+**Implications**:
+
+- All infrastructure defined in declarative code
+- Infrastructure changes go through code review
+- Environments are reproducible from code
+- No manual changes to production infrastructure
+- Infrastructure versioned alongside application code
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Infrastructure defined as code
+- [ ] Infrastructure code version-controlled
+- [ ] Automated deployment pipeline for infrastructure
+- [ ] No manual infrastructure changes in production
+
+---
+
+### 15. Automated Testing
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+All code changes MUST be validated through automated testing before deployment to production.
+
+**Test Pyramid**:
+
+- **Unit Tests**: Fast, isolated, high coverage (70-80% of tests)
+- **Integration Tests**: Test component interactions (15-20% of tests)
+- **End-to-End Tests**: Critical user journeys (5-10% of tests)
+
+**Required Test Types**:
+
+- Functional tests (does it work?)
+- Performance tests (is it fast enough?)
+- Security tests (is it secure?)
+- Resilience tests (does it handle failures?)
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Automated tests exist and pass before merge
+- [ ] Test coverage meets defined thresholds
+- [ ] Critical paths have end-to-end tests
+- [ ] Performance tests run regularly
+
+---
+
+### 16. Continuous Integration and Deployment
+
+**Principle Statement**:
+All code changes MUST go through automated build, test, and deployment pipelines with quality gates at each stage.
+
+**Pipeline Stages**:
+
+1. **Source Control**: All changes committed to version control
+2. **Build**: Automated compilation and packaging
+3. **Test**: Automated test execution
+4. **Security Scan**: Dependency and code vulnerability scanning
+5. **Deployment**: Automated deployment to environments
+
+**Quality Gates**:
+
+- All tests must pass
+- No critical security vulnerabilities
+- Code review approval required
+- Deployment requires production readiness checklist
+
+**Validation Gates**:
+
+- [ ] Automated CI/CD pipeline exists
+- [ ] Pipeline includes security scanning
+- [ ] Deployment is automated and repeatable
+- [ ] Rollback capability tested
+
+---
+
+## VI. Exception Process
+
+### Requesting Architecture Exceptions
+
+Principles are mandatory unless a documented exception is approved by the Enterprise Architecture Review Board.
+
+**Valid Exception Reasons**:
+
+- Technical constraints that prevent compliance
+- Regulatory or legal requirements
+- Transitional state during migration
+- Pilot/proof-of-concept with defined end date
+
+**Exception Request Requirements**:
+
+- [ ] Justification with business/technical rationale
+- [ ] Alternative approach and compensating controls
+- [ ] Risk assessment and mitigation plan
+- [ ] Expiration date (exceptions are time-bound)
+- [ ] Remediation plan to achieve compliance
+
+**Approval Process**:
+
+1. Submit exception request to Enterprise Architecture team
+2. Review by architecture review board
+3. CTO/CIO approval for exceptions to critical principles
+4. Document exception in project architecture documentation
+5. Regular review of exceptions (quarterly)
+
+---
+
+## VII. Governance and Compliance
+
+### Architecture Review Gates
+
+All projects must pass architecture reviews at key milestones:
+
+**Discovery/Alpha**:
+
+- [ ] Architecture principles understood
+- [ ] High-level approach aligns with principles
+- [ ] No obvious principle violations
+
+**Beta/Design**:
+
+- [ ] Detailed architecture documented
+- [ ] Compliance with each principle validated
+- [ ] Exceptions requested and approved
+- [ ] Security and data principles validated
+
+**Pre-Production**:
+
+- [ ] Implementation matches approved architecture
+- [ ] All validation gates passed
+- [ ] Operational readiness verified
+
+### Enforcement
+
+- Architecture reviews are **mandatory** for all projects
+- Principle violations must be remediated before production deployment
+- Approved exceptions are time-bound and reviewed quarterly
+- Retrospective reviews for compliance on live systems
+
+---
+
+## VIII. Appendix
+
+### Principle Summary Checklist
+
+| Principle | Category | Criticality | Validation |
+|-----------|----------|-------------|------------|
+| Scalability and Elasticity | Strategic | HIGH | Load testing, scaling metrics |
+| Resilience and Fault Tolerance | Strategic | CRITICAL | Chaos testing, RTO/RPO |
+| Interoperability and Integration | Strategic | HIGH | API specs, versioning |
+| Security by Design | Strategic | CRITICAL | Threat model, pen testing |
+| Observability | Strategic | HIGH | Metrics, logs, traces |
+| Data Sovereignty | Data | CRITICAL | Compliance audit |
+| Data Quality | Data | MEDIUM | Quality metrics |
+| Single Source of Truth | Data | HIGH | Data lineage |
+| Loose Coupling | Integration | HIGH | Deployment independence |
+| Asynchronous Communication | Integration | MEDIUM | Async patterns used |
+| Performance | Quality | HIGH | Load testing |
+| Availability | Quality | CRITICAL | SLA monitoring |
+| Maintainability | Quality | MEDIUM | Documentation, tests |
+| Infrastructure as Code | DevOps | HIGH | IaC coverage |
+| Automated Testing | DevOps | HIGH | Test coverage |
+| CI/CD | DevOps | HIGH | Pipeline exists |
+
+---
+
+**Document Version History**
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|
+| 0.1 | [DATE] | [AUTHOR] | Initial draft |
+| 1.0 | [DATE] | [AUTHOR] | Ratified version |
+
+## External References
+
+> This section provides traceability from generated content back to source documents.
+> Follow citation instructions in the project's citation reference guide.
+
+### Document Register
+
+| Doc ID | Filename | Type | Source Location | Description |
+|--------|----------|------|-----------------|-------------|
+| *None provided* | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Citations
+
+| Citation ID | Doc ID | Page/Section | Category | Quoted Passage |
+|-------------|--------|--------------|----------|----------------|
+| — | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Unreferenced Documents
+
+| Filename | Source Location | Reason |
+|----------|-----------------|--------|
+| — | — | — |
+
+---
+
+**Generated by**: ArcKit `/arckit:principles` command
+**Generated on**: [DATE]
+**ArcKit Version**: [VERSION]
+**Project**: [PROJECT_NAME]
+**Model**: [AI_MODEL]