arckit-cli 6.1.1__py3-none-any.whl

arckit_cli-6.1.1.data/data/share/arckit/.arckit/templates/wardley-doctrine-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,299 @@
+# Wardley Doctrine Assessment: {context_name}
+
+> **Template Origin**: Official | **ArcKit Version**: [VERSION] | **Command**: `/arckit:wardley.doctrine`
+
+## Document Control
+
+<!-- DOC-CONTROL-HEADER -->
+<!-- Resolved at command-execution time to _partials/document-control-uk.md or _partials/document-control-uae.md based on plugin userConfig classification_scheme + governance_framework. See _partials/RENDERING.md (when present). -->
+
+## Revision History
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approved By | Approval Date |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|-------------|---------------|
+| [VERSION] | [DATE] | ArcKit AI | Initial creation from `/arckit:wardley.doctrine` command | PENDING | PENDING |
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+**Overall Maturity Score**: [X.X / 5.0] — [Novice / Developing / Practising / Advanced / Leading]
+
+**Phase Positioning**:
+
+| Phase | Name | Score | Status |
+|-------|------|-------|--------|
+| Phase I | Stop Self-Harm | [X.X / 5.0] | [Not Started / In Progress / Achieved] |
+| Phase II | Becoming More Context Aware | [X.X / 5.0] | [Not Started / In Progress / Achieved] |
+| Phase III | Better for Less | [X.X / 5.0] | [Not Started / In Progress / Achieved] |
+| Phase IV | Continuously Evolving | [X.X / 5.0] | [Not Started / In Progress / Achieved] |
+
+**Critical Findings**:
+
+1. {Most significant gap or risk from the assessment}
+2. {Second critical finding}
+3. {Third critical finding}
+
+[2-3 sentence narrative summary of the organisation's doctrine maturity and most urgent priorities.]
+
+---
+
+## Strategy Cycle Context
+
+| Element | Summary |
+|---------|---------|
+| **Purpose** | {Why does this organisation or team exist? What is the mission?} |
+| **Landscape** | {What does the Wardley Map of this context reveal? Key components and their evolution positions.} |
+| **Climate** | {What external forces are acting on this landscape? Market shifts, regulation, technology change.} |
+| **Leadership** | {What leadership style is currently in use? Commander's intent vs. detailed instruction? Risk appetite?} |
+
+---
+
+## Doctrine Assessment Matrix
+
+Score key: **1** = Not practised | **2** = Awareness only | **3** = Partially practised | **4** = Consistently practised | **5** = Embedded and exemplary
+
+### Phase I: Stop Self-Harm
+
+| Category | Principle | Score (1-5) | Evidence | Improvement Action |
+|----------|-----------|:-----------:|----------|--------------------|
+| Communication | Use a common language | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Communication | Be transparent | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Communication | Challenge assumptions | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Development | Know your users | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Development | Focus on user needs | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Development | Use appropriate methods | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Development | Remove bias and duplication | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Development | Use standards where appropriate | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Development | Manage inertia | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Development | Manage failure | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Development | Think small (ecosystem) | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+
+### Phase II: Becoming More Context Aware
+
+| Category | Principle | Score (1-5) | Evidence | Improvement Action |
+|----------|-----------|:-----------:|----------|--------------------|
+| Situational Awareness | Know the details | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Situational Awareness | Use appropriate doctrine | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Situational Awareness | Be aware of context-specific play | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Situational Awareness | Understand your environment | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Structure | Design for constant evolution | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Structure | Small teams with alignment and autonomy | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Structure | Move fast | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Structure | Be pragmatic | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Strategy | Think aptitude and attitude | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Strategy | There is no one culture | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Strategy | Seek the best | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+
+### Phase III: Better for Less
+
+| Category | Principle | Score (1-5) | Evidence | Improvement Action |
+|----------|-----------|:-----------:|----------|--------------------|
+| Efficiency | Optimise flow | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Efficiency | Effectiveness over efficiency | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Efficiency | Think big | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Efficiency | Strategy is iterative not linear | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Operations | Use multiple methods of working | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Operations | A bias towards the new | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Operations | Be the owner | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Operations | Think aptitude and attitude | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Operations | Set exceptional standards | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+
+### Phase IV: Continuously Evolving
+
+| Category | Principle | Score (1-5) | Evidence | Improvement Action |
+|----------|-----------|:-----------:|----------|--------------------|
+| Learning | Listen to your ecosystems | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Learning | A bias towards action | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Learning | Exploit the landscape | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Learning | Understand that strategy is complex | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Leadership | Commit to the path | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Leadership | Accept uncertainty | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Leadership | Spend time on doctrine | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+| Leadership | Lead the ecosystems | [X] | {Evidence or observation} | {Specific action to improve} |
+
+---
+
+## Detailed Phase Findings
+
+### Phase I: Stop Self-Harm — Detailed Findings
+
+**Phase Score**: [X.X / 5.0]
+
+**Strongest principles in this phase**:
+
+- {Principle name} (Score: X) — {Why this scores well, specific evidence}
+
+**Weakest principles in this phase**:
+
+- {Principle name} (Score: X) — {Why this scores poorly, specific evidence}
+
+**Phase I Narrative**:
+
+[2-4 sentences describing the organisation's overall performance on Phase I. What self-harming behaviours are present? What is being done well?]
+
+---
+
+### Phase II: Becoming More Context Aware — Detailed Findings
+
+**Phase Score**: [X.X / 5.0]
+
+**Strongest principles in this phase**:
+
+- {Principle name} (Score: X) — {Why this scores well, specific evidence}
+
+**Weakest principles in this phase**:
+
+- {Principle name} (Score: X) — {Why this scores poorly, specific evidence}
+
+**Phase II Narrative**:
+
+[2-4 sentences describing situational awareness maturity. Does the organisation understand its landscape? Does leadership have context for decisions?]
+
+---
+
+### Phase III: Better for Less — Detailed Findings
+
+**Phase Score**: [X.X / 5.0]
+
+**Strongest principles in this phase**:
+
+- {Principle name} (Score: X) — {Why this scores well, specific evidence}
+
+**Weakest principles in this phase**:
+
+- {Principle name} (Score: X) — {Why this scores poorly, specific evidence}
+
+**Phase III Narrative**:
+
+[2-4 sentences describing efficiency and operational maturity. Where is the organisation wasting effort? Where are there genuine improvements?]
+
+---
+
+### Phase IV: Continuously Evolving — Detailed Findings
+
+**Phase Score**: [X.X / 5.0]
+
+**Strongest principles in this phase**:
+
+- {Principle name} (Score: X) — {Why this scores well, specific evidence}
+
+**Weakest principles in this phase**:
+
+- {Principle name} (Score: X) — {Why this scores poorly, specific evidence}
+
+**Phase IV Narrative**:
+
+[2-4 sentences describing the organisation's capacity for continuous evolution. Is learning embedded? Do ecosystems inform strategy?]
+
+---
+
+## Previous Assessment Comparison
+
+*Populate on re-assessment only. Leave blank for initial assessment.*
+
+| Principle | Previous Score | Current Score | Trend | Notes |
+|-----------|:--------------:|:-------------:|:-----:|-------|
+| {Principle} | [X] | [X] | ↑ / ↓ / → | {What changed and why} |
+| {Principle} | [X] | [X] | ↑ / ↓ / → | {What changed and why} |
+
+**Overall Score Change**: [Previous X.X] → [Current X.X] ([+/- delta])
+
+---
+
+## Critical Gaps
+
+| Rank | Phase | Category | Principle | Current Score | Target Score | Business Impact |
+|------|-------|----------|-----------|:-------------:|:------------:|-----------------|
+| 1 | {Phase} | {Category} | {Principle} | [X] | [X] | {Why this gap matters to the organisation} |
+| 2 | {Phase} | {Category} | {Principle} | [X] | [X] | {Why this gap matters to the organisation} |
+| 3 | {Phase} | {Category} | {Principle} | [X] | [X] | {Why this gap matters to the organisation} |
+| 4 | {Phase} | {Category} | {Principle} | [X] | [X] | {Why this gap matters to the organisation} |
+| 5 | {Phase} | {Category} | {Principle} | [X] | [X] | {Why this gap matters to the organisation} |
+
+---
+
+## Implementation Roadmap
+
+### Immediate Actions (0-3 months)
+
+| Action | Principle(s) Addressed | Owner | Success Criteria |
+|--------|----------------------|-------|------------------|
+| {Action 1} | {Principle name(s)} | {Owner role} | {Measurable outcome} |
+| {Action 2} | {Principle name(s)} | {Owner role} | {Measurable outcome} |
+| {Action 3} | {Principle name(s)} | {Owner role} | {Measurable outcome} |
+
+### Short-Term Actions (3-12 months)
+
+| Action | Principle(s) Addressed | Owner | Success Criteria |
+|--------|----------------------|-------|------------------|
+| {Action 4} | {Principle name(s)} | {Owner role} | {Measurable outcome} |
+| {Action 5} | {Principle name(s)} | {Owner role} | {Measurable outcome} |
+| {Action 6} | {Principle name(s)} | {Owner role} | {Measurable outcome} |
+
+### Long-Term Actions (12-24 months)
+
+| Action | Principle(s) Addressed | Owner | Success Criteria |
+|--------|----------------------|-------|------------------|
+| {Action 7} | {Principle name(s)} | {Owner role} | {Measurable outcome} |
+| {Action 8} | {Principle name(s)} | {Owner role} | {Measurable outcome} |
+
+---
+
+## Recommendations
+
+1. **{Recommendation 1}**
+   - **Rationale**: {Why this is the top priority}
+   - **Expected Benefit**: {What improves if this is done}
+   - **Risk of Inaction**: {What happens if this is not done}
+
+2. **{Recommendation 2}**
+   - **Rationale**: {Why this recommendation is important}
+   - **Expected Benefit**: {What improves if this is done}
+   - **Risk of Inaction**: {What happens if this is not done}
+
+3. **{Recommendation 3}**
+   - **Rationale**: {Why this recommendation is important}
+   - **Expected Benefit**: {What improves if this is done}
+   - **Risk of Inaction**: {What happens if this is not done}
+
+---
+
+## Traceability
+
+| Artifact | Document ID | Relationship |
+|----------|-------------|--------------|
+| Architecture Principles | ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-PRIN-v[VERSION] | Doctrine principles should align with and reinforce architecture principles |
+| Wardley Map | ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-WARD-[NNN]-v[VERSION] | Landscape and climate context for this assessment |
+| Stakeholder Analysis | ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-STKE-v[VERSION] | Leadership and culture context; stakeholder awareness of doctrine |
+
+## External References
+
+> This section provides traceability from generated content back to source documents.
+> Follow citation instructions in the project's citation reference guide.
+
+### Document Register
+
+| Doc ID | Filename | Type | Source Location | Description |
+|--------|----------|------|-----------------|-------------|
+| *None provided* | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Citations
+
+| Citation ID | Doc ID | Page/Section | Category | Quoted Passage |
+|-------------|--------|--------------|----------|----------------|
+| — | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Unreferenced Documents
+
+| Filename | Source Location | Reason |
+|----------|-----------------|--------|
+| — | — | — |
+
+---
+
+**Generated by**: ArcKit `/arckit:wardley.doctrine` command
+**Generated on**: [DATE]
+**ArcKit Version**: [VERSION]
+**Project**: [PROJECT_NAME]
+**Model**: [AI_MODEL]

arckit_cli-6.1.1.data/data/share/arckit/.arckit/templates/wardley-gameplay-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
+# Wardley Gameplay Analysis: {context_name}
+
+> **Template Origin**: Official | **ArcKit Version**: [VERSION] | **Command**: `/arckit:wardley.gameplay`
+
+## Document Control
+
+<!-- DOC-CONTROL-HEADER -->
+<!-- Resolved at command-execution time to _partials/document-control-uk.md or _partials/document-control-uae.md based on plugin userConfig classification_scheme + governance_framework. See _partials/RENDERING.md (when present). -->
+
+## Revision History
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approved By | Approval Date |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|-------------|---------------|
+| [VERSION] | [DATE] | ArcKit AI | Initial creation from `/arckit:wardley.gameplay` command | PENDING | PENDING |
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+[2-4 sentences summarising the strategic context, the plays selected, and the anticipated outcomes. Include overall strategic posture: aggressive/defensive/opportunistic.]
+
+**Selected Plays Summary**:
+
+| Play | Category | Recommendation | Priority |
+|------|----------|----------------|----------|
+| {Play 1} | {Category A-K} | Apply | High / Medium / Low |
+| {Play 2} | {Category A-K} | Apply | High / Medium / Low |
+| {Play 3} | {Category A-K} | Monitor | High / Medium / Low |
+
+---
+
+## Map Reference
+
+This gameplay analysis is derived from the following Wardley Map artifact:
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| **WARD Document ID** | ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-WARD-[NNN]-v[VERSION] |
+| **Map Title** | {map_title} |
+| **Map Date** | [YYYY-MM-DD] |
+| **Key Components** | {List 3-5 key components from the map} |
+
+---
+
+## Situational Assessment
+
+### Position Analysis
+
+*What does your current map position tell you about strategic options?*
+
+- **Anchor (User Need)**: {Anchor component and its evolution position}
+- **Differentiating Components**: {Components in Genesis/Custom that provide competitive advantage}
+- **Commodity Dependencies**: {Components already at commodity — not strategic, cost-focus only}
+- **Evolution Pressure**: {Components showing signs of rapid evolution — where the map is moving}
+
+### Capability Assessment
+
+*What can your organisation do well, and where are the gaps?*
+
+- **Core Strengths**: {What the organisation does better than competitors in this landscape}
+- **Critical Weaknesses**: {Capability gaps that constrain strategic options}
+- **Unique Assets**: {Assets, data, relationships, or IP that could be leveraged}
+- **Constraints**: {Budget, skills, regulatory, or time constraints affecting play selection}
+
+### Market Context
+
+*What is happening in the competitive environment?*
+
+- **Competitor Positions**: {Where are key competitors positioned on the map?}
+- **Market Signals**: {What trends indicate where the market is heading?}
+- **Regulatory Environment**: {Any constraints or opportunities from regulation?}
+- **Partnership Opportunities**: {Potential ecosystem partners or coalition plays?}
+
+---
+
+## Play Options by Category
+
+### A. Accelerator Plays
+
+*Speed up component evolution to reshape the landscape.*
+
+| Play Name | Alignment | Applicability | Recommendation |
+|-----------|-----------|---------------|----------------|
+| Open approaches (open source, open data, open standards) | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Exploit the ecosystem | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Contribute to standards bodies | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+
+### B. Decelerator Plays
+
+*Slow down competitor evolution or commoditisation.*
+
+| Play Name | Alignment | Applicability | Recommendation |
+|-----------|-----------|---------------|----------------|
+| FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Differentiation | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Lobbying and regulatory influence | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+
+### C. Market Plays
+
+*Shape market conditions in your favour.*
+
+| Play Name | Alignment | Applicability | Recommendation |
+|-----------|-----------|---------------|----------------|
+| Buyer and supplier education | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Creating constraints | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Press and analyst briefings | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+
+### D. Defensive Plays
+
+*Protect your position from competitive threats.*
+
+| Play Name | Alignment | Applicability | Recommendation |
+|-----------|-----------|---------------|----------------|
+| Protective moat (IP, switching costs) | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Embrace and extend | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Threat acquisition | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+
+### E. Attacking Plays
+
+*Move against competitor positions.*
+
+| Play Name | Alignment | Applicability | Recommendation |
+|-----------|-----------|---------------|----------------|
+| Exploiting inertia | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Undermining barriers to entry | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Talent acquisition | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+
+### F. Ecosystem Plays
+
+*Leverage or build ecosystems for competitive advantage.*
+
+| Play Name | Alignment | Applicability | Recommendation |
+|-----------|-----------|---------------|----------------|
+| Building a platform | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Co-opting an ecosystem | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Creating a pricing game | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+
+### G. Positional Plays
+
+*Move to advantageous positions on the map.*
+
+| Play Name | Alignment | Applicability | Recommendation |
+|-----------|-----------|---------------|----------------|
+| Tower and moat | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Land grab | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Sensing engine | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+
+### H. Poison Plays
+
+*Make a position undesirable for competitors.*
+
+| Play Name | Alignment | Applicability | Recommendation |
+|-----------|-----------|---------------|----------------|
+| Disposal of a liability | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Swamping | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+
+### I. Innovation Plays
+
+*Create new value through novel combinations.*
+
+| Play Name | Alignment | Applicability | Recommendation |
+|-----------|-----------|---------------|----------------|
+| Design for uncharted spaces | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Signal distortion | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+
+### J. People Plays
+
+*Leverage talent and culture as competitive advantage.*
+
+| Play Name | Alignment | Applicability | Recommendation |
+|-----------|-----------|---------------|----------------|
+| Centres of gravity | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Pioneer / settler / town planner model | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+
+### K. Political Plays
+
+*Navigate organisational or market politics.*
+
+| Play Name | Alignment | Applicability | Recommendation |
+|-----------|-----------|---------------|----------------|
+| Creating artificial constraints | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+| Trojan horse | High / Medium / Low | {Why or why not applicable} | Apply / Monitor / Skip |
+
+---
+
+## Play-Position Matrix Evaluation
+
+*For each key component position on the map, identify which plays are naturally aligned.*
+
+| Component | Visibility | Evolution | Stage | Recommended Plays | Rationale |
+|-----------|-----------|-----------|-------|-------------------|-----------|
+| {Component 1} | {0.xx} | {0.xx} | Genesis | {Play names} | {Why these plays fit this position} |
+| {Component 2} | {0.xx} | {0.xx} | Custom | {Play names} | {Why these plays fit this position} |
+| {Component 3} | {0.xx} | {0.xx} | Product | {Play names} | {Why these plays fit this position} |
+| {Component 4} | {0.xx} | {0.xx} | Commodity | {Play names} | {Why these plays fit this position} |
+
+---
+
+## Play Compatibility Analysis
+
+*Evaluate whether selected plays reinforce or conflict with each other.*
+
+| Play A | Play B | Compatibility | Notes |
+|--------|--------|:-------------:|-------|
+| {Play 1} | {Play 2} | Reinforces | {Why these plays work well together} |
+| {Play 1} | {Play 3} | Neutral | {No significant interaction} |
+| {Play 2} | {Play 4} | Conflicts | {Why these plays undermine each other — resolve or sequence carefully} |
+
+**Resolution for conflicts**: {Describe how conflicting plays will be sequenced or one prioritised over the other.}
+
+---
+
+## Selected Plays
+
+### Play 1: {Play Name}
+
+**Category**: {A-K}
+**Description**: {What this play involves and how it works in this context}
+**Prerequisites**:
+
+- {Prerequisite 1 — capability, resource, or condition that must be in place}
+- {Prerequisite 2}
+
+**Execution Steps**:
+
+1. {Step 1}
+2. {Step 2}
+3. {Step 3}
+
+**Expected Outcomes**:
+
+- {Outcome 1 — what success looks like}
+- {Outcome 2}
+
+**Risks**:
+
+- {Risk 1 — what could go wrong}
+- {Risk 2}
+
+**Success Criteria**:
+
+- [ ] {Measurable indicator 1}
+- [ ] {Measurable indicator 2}
+
+**Review Points**: {When to review whether this play is working — e.g., 3 months, after specific milestone}
+
+---
+
+### Play 2: {Play Name}
+
+**Category**: {A-K}
+**Description**: {What this play involves and how it works in this context}
+**Prerequisites**:
+
+- {Prerequisite 1}
+
+**Execution Steps**:
+
+1. {Step 1}
+2. {Step 2}
+
+**Expected Outcomes**:
+
+- {Outcome 1}
+
+**Risks**:
+
+- {Risk 1}
+
+**Success Criteria**:
+
+- [ ] {Measurable indicator 1}
+
+**Review Points**: {When to review whether this play is working}
+
+---
+
+## Risk Assessment and Anti-Patterns
+
+### Play-Specific Risks
+
+| Risk | Play Affected | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
+|------|--------------|------------|--------|------------|
+| {Risk 1} | {Play name} | H / M / L | H / M / L | {Mitigation strategy} |
+| {Risk 2} | {Play name} | H / M / L | H / M / L | {Mitigation strategy} |
+
+### Common Gameplay Anti-Patterns to Avoid
+
+- **Playing too many games at once**: Focus on 2-3 plays maximum; spreading effort dilutes impact
+- **Ignoring inertia**: Plays that require rapid evolution will stall if internal or market inertia is not addressed
+- **Misreading evolution stage**: Applying Genesis plays to Commodity components (or vice versa) wastes resources
+- **Neglecting doctrine**: Gameplay without sound doctrine (Phase I) often backfires
+- **Static play selection**: Plays that are right today may be wrong in 12 months — review regularly
+
+---
+
+## Case Study References
+
+| Case Study | Play(s) Illustrated | Source | Relevance to This Context |
+|------------|---------------------|--------|--------------------------|
+| {Case study 1} | {Play names} | {Book / article / talk} | {Why this case is instructive here} |
+| {Case study 2} | {Play names} | {Book / article / talk} | {Why this case is instructive here} |
+
+**Reference**: Simon Wardley, *Wardley Maps* (CC BY-SA 4.0) — available at [https://learnwardleymapping.com/](https://learnwardleymapping.com/)
+
+---
+
+## Traceability
+
+| Artifact | Document ID | Relationship |
+|----------|-------------|--------------|
+| Wardley Map | ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-WARD-[NNN]-v[VERSION] | Source map providing landscape context for play selection |
+| Climate Assessment | ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-WCLM-[NNN]-v[VERSION] | Climate patterns that constrain or enable specific plays |
+| Doctrine Assessment | ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-WDOC-v[VERSION] | Doctrine maturity governs which plays are executable |
+| Architecture Principles | ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-PRIN-v[VERSION] | Plays must not violate established architecture principles |
+
+## External References
+
+> This section provides traceability from generated content back to source documents.
+> Follow citation instructions in the project's citation reference guide.
+
+### Document Register
+
+| Doc ID | Filename | Type | Source Location | Description |
+|--------|----------|------|-----------------|-------------|
+| *None provided* | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Citations
+
+| Citation ID | Doc ID | Page/Section | Category | Quoted Passage |
+|-------------|--------|--------------|----------|----------------|
+| — | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Unreferenced Documents
+
+| Filename | Source Location | Reason |
+|----------|-----------------|--------|
+| — | — | — |
+
+---
+
+**Generated by**: ArcKit `/arckit:wardley.gameplay` command
+**Generated on**: [DATE]
+**ArcKit Version**: [VERSION]
+**Project**: [PROJECT_NAME]
+**Model**: [AI_MODEL]