arckit-cli 6.1.1__py3-none-any.whl

arckit_cli-6.1.1.data/data/share/arckit/.arckit/templates/story-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,889 @@
+# [PROJECT_NAME] - Project Story
+
+> **Template Origin**: Official | **ArcKit Version**: [VERSION] | **Command**: `/arckit:story`
+
+## Document Control
+
+<!-- DOC-CONTROL-HEADER -->
+<!-- Resolved at command-execution time to _partials/document-control-uk.md or _partials/document-control-uae.md based on plugin userConfig classification_scheme + governance_framework. See _partials/RENDERING.md (when present). -->
+
+## Revision History
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approved By | Approval Date |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|-------------|---------------|
+| [VERSION] | [DATE] | ArcKit AI | Initial creation from `/arckit.[COMMAND]` command | [PENDING] | [PENDING] |
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+**Project**: [PROJECT_NAME]
+
+**Timeline Snapshot**:
+
+- **Project Start**: [START_DATE]
+- **Project End**: [END_DATE] (or "Ongoing")
+- **Total Duration**: [TOTAL_DAYS] days ([TOTAL_WEEKS] weeks)
+- **Artifacts Created**: [ARTIFACT_COUNT]
+- **Commands Executed**: [COMMAND_COUNT]
+- **Phases Completed**: [PHASE_COUNT]
+
+**Key Outcomes**:
+
+- [Outcome 1]
+- [Outcome 2]
+- [Outcome 3]
+
+**Governance Achievements**:
+
+- ✅ Architecture Principles Established
+- ✅ Stakeholder Analysis Completed
+- ✅ Risk Register Maintained
+- ✅ Business Case Approved
+- ✅ Requirements Defined ([BR_COUNT] BR, [FR_COUNT] FR, [NFR_COUNT] NFR)
+- ✅ Design Reviewed
+- ✅ Traceability Matrix Complete
+
+**Strategic Context**:
+
+[Brief overview of the project's strategic importance, business drivers, and how it evolved through the ArcKit governance framework]
+
+---
+
+## 📅 Complete Project Timeline
+
+### Visual Timeline - Gantt Chart
+
+```mermaid
+gantt
+    title [PROJECT_NAME] Project Timeline
+    dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
+
+    section Foundation
+    Architecture Principles         :done, principles, [START_DATE], [DURATION]
+    Stakeholder Analysis           :done, stakeholders, after principles, [DURATION]
+    Risk Assessment                :done, risk, after stakeholders, [DURATION]
+
+    section Business Case
+    Strategic Outline Business Case :done, sobc, [DATE], [DURATION]
+    Data Model                     :done, data, after sobc, [DURATION]
+
+    section Requirements
+    Requirements Definition        :done, req, [DATE], [DURATION]
+    Wardley Mapping               :done, wardley, after req, [DURATION]
+    Technology Research           :done, research, after req, [DURATION]
+
+    section Procurement
+    Statement of Work             :done, sow, [DATE], [DURATION]
+    Vendor Evaluation            :done, eval, after sow, [DURATION]
+
+    section Design
+    Architecture Diagrams        :done, diagrams, [DATE], [DURATION]
+    High-Level Design Review     :done, hld, after diagrams, [DURATION]
+    Detailed Design Review       :done, dld, after hld, [DURATION]
+
+    section Delivery
+    Product Backlog             :done, backlog, [DATE], [DURATION]
+    ServiceNow Design           :done, snow, after backlog, [DURATION]
+
+    section Compliance
+    Service Assessment          :done, assessment, [DATE], [DURATION]
+    Secure by Design           :done, secure, after assessment, [DURATION]
+
+    section Governance
+    Traceability Matrix        :done, trace, [DATE], [DURATION]
+    Quality Analysis           :done, analyze, after trace, [DURATION]
+```
+
+### Linear Command Flow Timeline
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart TD
+    Start([Project Initiated<br/>[START_DATE]]) --> Principles
+
+    Principles["arckit.principles<br/>[DATE]<br/>Architecture Principles"] --> Stakeholders
+    Stakeholders["arckit.stakeholders<br/>[DATE]<br/>Stakeholder Analysis"] --> Risk
+    Risk["arckit.risk<br/>[DATE]<br/>Risk Register"] --> SOBC
+
+    SOBC["arckit.sobc<br/>[DATE]<br/>Business Case"] --> Requirements
+    Requirements["arckit.requirements<br/>[DATE]<br/>Requirements"] --> DataModel
+    DataModel["arckit.data-model<br/>[DATE]<br/>Data Model"] --> Research
+
+    Research["arckit.research<br/>[DATE]<br/>Technology Research"] --> Wardley
+    Wardley["arckit.wardley<br/>[DATE]<br/>Wardley Maps"] --> Diagrams
+    Diagrams["arckit.diagram<br/>[DATE]<br/>Architecture Diagrams"] --> SOW
+
+    SOW["arckit.sow<br/>[DATE]<br/>Statement of Work"] --> Evaluate
+    Evaluate["arckit.evaluate<br/>[DATE]<br/>Vendor Evaluation"] --> HLD
+
+    HLD["arckit.hld-review<br/>[DATE]<br/>HLD Review"] --> DLD
+    DLD["arckit.dld-review<br/>[DATE]<br/>DLD Review"] --> Backlog
+
+    Backlog["arckit.backlog<br/>[DATE]<br/>Product Backlog"] --> ServiceNow
+    ServiceNow["arckit.servicenow<br/>[DATE]<br/>ServiceNow Design"] --> Compliance
+
+    Compliance{Compliance<br/>Requirements?}
+    Compliance -->|UK Gov| TCoP["arckit.tcop<br/>[DATE]<br/>TCoP Review"]
+    Compliance -->|All Projects| Secure["arckit.secure<br/>[DATE]<br/>Secure by Design"]
+    Compliance -->|MOD| ModSecure["arckit.mod-secure<br/>[DATE]<br/>MOD Security"]
+    Compliance -->|AI System| AIPlaybook["arckit.ai-playbook<br/>[DATE]<br/>AI Playbook"]
+
+    TCoP --> Trace
+    Secure --> Trace
+    ModSecure --> Trace
+    AIPlaybook --> Trace
+
+    Trace["arckit.traceability<br/>[DATE]<br/>Traceability Matrix"] --> Analyze
+    Analyze["arckit.analyze<br/>[DATE]<br/>Quality Analysis"] --> End
+
+    End([Project Complete<br/>[END_DATE]])
+
+    style Start fill:#e1f5e1
+    style End fill:#e1f5e1
+    style Principles fill:#fff4e6
+    style Requirements fill:#e3f2fd
+    style SOW fill:#f3e5f5
+    style HLD fill:#fce4ec
+    style Backlog fill:#e8f5e9
+    style Compliance fill:#fff3e0
+    style Trace fill:#f1f8e9
+```
+
+### Timeline Table - Detailed Event Log
+
+| # | Date | Days from Start | Event Type | Command | Artifact | Description |
+|---|------|-----------------|------------|---------|----------|-------------|
+| 1 | [DATE] | 0 | Foundation | `/arckit:principles` | ARC-000-PRIN-v*.md | Established enterprise architecture principles |
+| 2 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Foundation | `/arckit:stakeholders` | ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STKE-v*.md | Analyzed [N] stakeholders, [M] goals, [P] outcomes |
+| 3 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Risk | `/arckit:risk` | ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-RISK-v*.md | Identified [N] risks ([X] high, [Y] medium, [Z] low) |
+| 4 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Business Case | `/arckit:sobc` | ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-SOBC-v*.md | Strategic Outline Business Case (5-case model) |
+| 5 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Requirements | `/arckit:requirements` | ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-REQ-v*.md | [BR] business, [FR] functional, [NFR] non-functional reqs |
+| 6 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Data | `/arckit:data-model` | ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-DATA-v*.md | [N] entities, [M] relationships, GDPR compliance |
+| 7 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Research | `/arckit:research` | ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-RSCH-v*.md | Evaluated [N] options (build vs buy analysis) |
+| 8 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Strategy | `/arckit:wardley` | wardley-maps/ARC-*-WARD-*.md | Strategic positioning and evolution |
+| 9 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Architecture | `/arckit:diagram` | diagrams/ARC-*-DIAG-*.md | C4 context/container/component diagrams |
+| 10 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Procurement | `/arckit:sow` | ARC-*-SOW-*.md | Statement of Work for vendor RFP |
+| 11 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Evaluation | `/arckit:evaluate` | ARC-*-EVAL-*.md | Vendor evaluation framework |
+| 12 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Design Review | `/arckit:hld-review` | vendors/[VENDOR]/reviews/ARC-*-HLDR-*.md | High-level design assessment |
+| 13 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Design Review | `/arckit:dld-review` | vendors/[VENDOR]/reviews/ARC-*-DLDR-*.md | Detailed design assessment |
+| 14 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Delivery | `/arckit:backlog` | ARC-*-BKLG-*.md | [N] user stories across [M] sprints |
+| 15 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Operations | `/arckit:servicenow` | ARC-*-SNOW-*.md | CMDB, SLAs, incident management |
+| 16 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Compliance | `/arckit:tcop` | ARC-*-TCOP-*.md | Technology Code of Practice (13 points) |
+| 17 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Compliance | `/arckit:service-assessment` | ARC-*-SVCASS-*.md | GDS Service Standard (14 points) |
+| 18 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Security | `/arckit:secure` | ARC-*-SECD-*.md | NCSC CAF, Cyber Essentials, UK GDPR |
+| 19 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | AI Compliance | `/arckit:ai-playbook` | ARC-*-AIPB-*.md | Responsible AI deployment |
+| 20 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Transparency | `/arckit:atrs` | ARC-*-ATRS-*.md | Algorithmic Transparency Recording |
+| 21 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Traceability | `/arckit:traceability` | ARC-*-TRAC-*.md | End-to-end requirement traceability |
+| 22 | [DATE] | [DAYS] | Governance | `/arckit:analyze` | ARC-*-ANAL-*.md | Governance quality assessment |
+
+### Phase Duration Analysis
+
+```mermaid
+pie title Project Phase Time Distribution
+    "Foundation (Principles, Stakeholders, Risk)" : [PERCENTAGE]
+    "Business Case & Requirements" : [PERCENTAGE]
+    "Research & Strategic Planning" : [PERCENTAGE]
+    "Procurement & Vendor Selection" : [PERCENTAGE]
+    "Design & Review" : [PERCENTAGE]
+    "Delivery Planning" : [PERCENTAGE]
+    "Compliance & Security" : [PERCENTAGE]
+    "Governance & Traceability" : [PERCENTAGE]
+```
+
+### Timeline Metrics
+
+| Metric | Value | Analysis |
+|--------|-------|----------|
+| **Project Duration** | [TOTAL_DAYS] days ([TOTAL_WEEKS] weeks) | [Analysis of timeline] |
+| **Average Phase Duration** | [AVG_DAYS] days | [Comparison to typical projects] |
+| **Longest Phase** | [PHASE_NAME] ([DAYS] days) | [Why this phase took longest] |
+| **Shortest Phase** | [PHASE_NAME] ([DAYS] days) | [Why this phase was fastest] |
+| **Commands per Week** | [VELOCITY] | [Velocity analysis] |
+| **Artifacts per Week** | [VELOCITY] | [Output rate analysis] |
+| **Time to First Artifact** | [DAYS] days | From project start to ARC-000-PRIN-v*.md |
+| **Time to Requirements** | [DAYS] days | Critical milestone for project direction |
+| **Time to Vendor Selection** | [DAYS] days | Critical milestone for procurement |
+| **Time to Design Review** | [DAYS] days | Critical milestone for implementation readiness |
+| **Compliance Time** | [DAYS] days ([PERCENTAGE]% of total) | Time spent on compliance artifacts |
+
+### Milestones Achieved
+
+```mermaid
+timeline
+    title [PROJECT_NAME] Key Milestones
+    [START_DATE] : Project Initiated
+                  : Architecture Principles Established
+    [DATE] : Stakeholder Analysis Complete
+           : [N] Stakeholders, [M] Goals
+    [DATE] : Risk Register Established
+           : [N] Risks Identified
+    [DATE] : Business Case Approved
+           : SOBC (5-case model)
+    [DATE] : Requirements Defined
+           : [BR] BR, [FR] FR, [NFR] NFR
+    [DATE] : Technology Research Complete
+           : Build vs Buy Decision
+    [DATE] : Vendor Selected
+           : [VENDOR_NAME]
+    [DATE] : Design Reviews Complete
+           : HLD + DLD Approved
+    [DATE] : Delivery Plan Ready
+           : [N] User Stories, [M] Sprints
+    [DATE] : Compliance Verified
+           : [FRAMEWORK] Assessment
+    [END_DATE] : Project Governance Complete
+              : Traceability Matrix Verified
+```
+
+---
+
+## Design & Delivery Review
+
+### Chapter 6: Design Review - Validating the Solution
+
+**Timeline**: [DATE] to [DATE] ([DAYS] days)
+
+**What Happened**:
+
+Following vendor selection, the chosen vendor ([VENDOR_NAME]) provided High-Level and Detailed Designs which underwent rigorous ArcKit governance reviews.
+
+**Key Activities**:
+
+1. **High-Level Design Review** (`/arckit:hld-review` - [DATE])
+   - Reviewed HLD document from [VENDOR_NAME]
+   - Assessment against:
+     - [N] architecture principles (compliance: [PERCENTAGE]%)
+     - [M] requirements (coverage: [PERCENTAGE]%)
+     - [P] NFRs (satisfaction: [PERCENTAGE]%)
+     - [Q] risks (mitigation: [PERCENTAGE]%)
+   - **Findings**:
+     - ✅ Strengths: [List strengths]
+     - ⚠️ Concerns: [List concerns]
+     - ❌ Gaps: [List gaps]
+   - **Verdict**: [APPROVED/APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS/REJECTED]
+   - **Conditions**: [List any conditional approval requirements]
+   - Created `projects/{project_id}/vendors/[vendor]/reviews/ARC-*-HLDR-*.md`
+
+2. **Detailed Design Review** (`/arckit:dld-review` - [DATE])
+   - Reviewed DLD document from [VENDOR_NAME]
+   - Assessment against:
+     - API specifications (completeness, RESTful compliance)
+     - Database schemas (normalization, indexing, GDPR)
+     - Security controls (authentication, authorization, encryption)
+     - Performance optimizations (caching, CDN, load balancing)
+     - Operational considerations (monitoring, logging, alerting)
+   - **Findings**:
+     - ✅ Implementation-ready components: [List]
+     - ⚠️ Needs clarification: [List]
+     - ❌ Requires rework: [List]
+   - **Verdict**: [APPROVED/APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS/REJECTED]
+   - Created `projects/{project_id}/vendors/[vendor]/reviews/ARC-*-DLDR-*.md`
+
+**Design Review Traceability**:
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart LR
+    Principles[Architecture<br/>Principles] --> HLD{HLD<br/>Review}
+    Reqs[Requirements<br/>BR/FR/NFR] --> HLD
+    Risks[Risk<br/>Register] --> HLD
+
+    HLD -->|Approved| DLD{DLD<br/>Review}
+    HLD -->|Gaps| Rework1[Vendor<br/>Rework]
+    Rework1 --> HLD
+
+    DLD -->|Approved| Backlog[Product<br/>Backlog]
+    DLD -->|Gaps| Rework2[Vendor<br/>Rework]
+    Rework2 --> DLD
+
+    Backlog --> Delivery[Delivery<br/>Phase]
+```
+
+**Timeline Context**:
+
+Design reviews took [DAYS] days ([PERCENTAGE]% of project timeline). [Analysis: "Multiple review iterations were required to address security concerns" or "Streamlined review process due to vendor's strong initial submission."]
+
+**Decision Points**:
+
+- HLD Review: [APPROVED/CONDITIONAL/REJECTED] on [DATE]
+- DLD Review: [APPROVED/CONDITIONAL/REJECTED] on [DATE]
+
+**Traceability Chain**:
+
+```text
+Architecture Principles → HLD Assessment Criteria → HLD Review Findings
+Requirements → HLD Coverage Analysis → HLD Review Findings
+Risk Register → DLD Risk Mitigation Verification → DLD Review Findings
+Data Requirements → Database Schema Review → DLD Review Findings
+```
+
+**Artifacts Created**:
+
+- `projects/{project_id}/vendors/[vendor]/reviews/ARC-*-HLDR-*.md`
+- `projects/{project_id}/vendors/[vendor]/reviews/ARC-*-DLDR-*.md`
+
+---
+
+### Chapter 7: Delivery Planning - From Requirements to Sprints
+
+**Timeline**: [DATE] to [DATE] ([DAYS] days)
+
+**What Happened**:
+
+With approved designs, the project moved into detailed delivery planning, translating requirements into user stories and establishing operational frameworks.
+
+**Key Activities**:
+
+1. **Product Backlog** (`/arckit:backlog` - [DATE])
+   - Converted [TOTAL_REQS] requirements into [TOTAL_STORIES] GDS-style user stories
+   - Story format: "As a [user type], I need to [action], so that [benefit]"
+   - Prioritization using MoSCoW (Must/Should/Could/Won't)
+   - Sprint planning:
+     - Total sprints: [N] sprints ([SPRINT_LENGTH]-week sprints)
+     - Sprint 1-[N]: [M] stories each
+     - Estimated duration: [WEEKS] weeks ([MONTHS] months)
+   - Velocity assumptions: [STORY_POINTS] points per sprint
+   - Created `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-BKLG-*.md`
+
+2. **ServiceNow Design** (`/arckit:servicenow` - [DATE])
+   - **CMDB Design**: [N] Configuration Items mapped to architecture components
+   - **SLA Design**: [M] SLAs defined
+     - Priority 1 (Critical): [RESPONSE_TIME] response, [RESOLUTION_TIME] resolution
+     - Priority 2 (High): [RESPONSE_TIME] response, [RESOLUTION_TIME] resolution
+     - Priority 3 (Medium): [RESPONSE_TIME] response, [RESOLUTION_TIME] resolution
+     - Priority 4 (Low): [RESPONSE_TIME] response, [RESOLUTION_TIME] resolution
+   - **Incident Management**: Workflows, escalation paths, assignment groups
+   - **Change Management**: CAB process, change windows, approval workflows
+   - **Service Catalog**: [P] catalog items for self-service
+   - Created `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-SNOW-*.md`
+
+**Backlog Summary**:
+
+```mermaid
+pie title User Stories by Priority
+    "Must-have" : [PERCENTAGE]
+    "Should-have" : [PERCENTAGE]
+    "Could-have" : [PERCENTAGE]
+    "Won't-have (this phase)" : [PERCENTAGE]
+```
+
+**Timeline Context**:
+
+Delivery planning took [DAYS] days ([PERCENTAGE]% of project). This phase established a [WEEKS]-week delivery roadmap with [N] sprints. [Analysis: "Efficient backlog creation was enabled by well-defined requirements" or "Extended planning was necessary for complex operational integration."]
+
+**Traceability Chain**:
+
+```text
+Requirements (BR/FR) → User Stories → Sprint Backlog
+Architecture Components → CMDB Configuration Items
+NFR-A-xxx (Availability) → SLA Targets
+Requirements → ServiceNow Catalog Items
+Stakeholders → ServiceNow Assignment Groups
+```
+
+**Artifacts Created**:
+
+- `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-BKLG-*.md`
+- `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-SNOW-*.md`
+
+---
+
+## Timeline Insights & Analysis
+
+### Pacing Analysis
+
+**Overall Pacing**: [ASSESSMENT: "Steady and measured" / "Accelerated" / "Extended with iterations"]
+
+The project timeline shows [PATTERN: "consistent progress across all phases" / "front-loaded research and planning" / "iterative design refinement"]. Key observations:
+
+- **Foundation Phase**: [DAYS] days - [ASSESSMENT: "Typical for establishing governance" / "Accelerated due to existing principles" / "Extended for stakeholder alignment"]
+- **Requirements Phase**: [DAYS] days - [ASSESSMENT: "Comprehensive requirements gathering" / "Rapid definition" / "Iterative refinement"]
+- **Procurement Phase**: [DAYS] days - [ASSESSMENT: "Efficient vendor selection" / "Thorough evaluation" / "Competitive tender process"]
+- **Design Review Phase**: [DAYS] days - [ASSESSMENT: "Single-pass approval" / "Multiple iterations" / "Conditional approval with rework"]
+- **Compliance Phase**: [DAYS] days - [ASSESSMENT: "Comprehensive validation" / "Streamlined checks" / "Deep security scrutiny"]
+
+### Critical Path
+
+The critical path through this project was:
+
+```text
+[START] → Architecture Principles → Stakeholders → Risk → SOBC → Requirements → Research →
+Wardley Maps → SOW → Vendor Selection → HLD Review → DLD Review → Backlog →
+Traceability → [END]
+```
+
+**Longest Dependencies**:
+
+1. [ACTIVITY_1] → [ACTIVITY_2]: [DAYS] days (rationale: [WHY])
+2. [ACTIVITY_2] → [ACTIVITY_3]: [DAYS] days (rationale: [WHY])
+3. [ACTIVITY_3] → [ACTIVITY_4]: [DAYS] days (rationale: [WHY])
+
+**Parallel Workstreams**:
+
+Some activities could have been parallelized:
+
+- [ACTIVITY_A] and [ACTIVITY_B] (no dependencies)
+- [ACTIVITY_C] and [ACTIVITY_D] (no dependencies)
+
+### Timeline Deviations
+
+**Expected vs Actual**:
+
+| Phase | Expected Duration | Actual Duration | Variance | Reason |
+|-------|------------------|-----------------|----------|---------|
+| [PHASE_1] | [DAYS] days | [DAYS] days | [+/-DAYS] days | [REASON] |
+| [PHASE_2] | [DAYS] days | [DAYS] days | [+/-DAYS] days | [REASON] |
+| [PHASE_3] | [DAYS] days | [DAYS] days | [+/-DAYS] days | [REASON] |
+
+**Key Factors Affecting Timeline**:
+
+1. [FACTOR_1: e.g., "Extended stakeholder engagement due to organizational complexity"]
+2. [FACTOR_2: e.g., "Accelerated requirements definition due to clear business drivers"]
+3. [FACTOR_3: e.g., "Multiple design review iterations due to security concerns"]
+
+### Velocity Metrics
+
+**Command Execution Velocity**:
+
+- Average: [COMMANDS_PER_WEEK] commands per week
+- Peak: [MAX_COMMANDS] commands in week [N] ([DATE] to [DATE])
+- Slowest: [MIN_COMMANDS] commands in week [M] ([DATE] to [DATE])
+
+**Velocity Analysis**:
+
+[Analysis: e.g., "The project maintained steady velocity throughout, with a peak during the requirements and research phase (weeks 3-5) when multiple artifacts were generated in parallel. The slowest week was during vendor evaluation, which required extended stakeholder consultation."]
+
+### Lessons Learned (Timeline)
+
+1. **What Went Well**:
+   - [LESSON_1: e.g., "Early establishment of architecture principles accelerated all subsequent decision-making"]
+   - [LESSON_2: e.g., "Wardley mapping enabled rapid build vs buy decisions"]
+
+2. **What Could Be Improved**:
+   - [LESSON_1: e.g., "Design reviews could have been parallelized with compliance assessments"]
+   - [LESSON_2: e.g., "Earlier engagement with security team would have reduced design review iterations"]
+
+---
+
+## Complete Traceability Chain
+
+This project achieved full end-to-end traceability following the ArcKit governance framework:
+
+### Traceability Visualization
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart TD
+    subgraph Foundation
+        Principles[Architecture<br/>Principles<br/>[N] principles]
+        Stakeholders[Stakeholder<br/>Analysis<br/>[M] stakeholders<br/>[P] goals]
+        Risk[Risk<br/>Register<br/>[Q] risks]
+    end
+
+    subgraph Business Case
+        SOBC[Strategic Outline<br/>Business Case<br/>5-case model]
+        DataModel[Data Model<br/>[R] entities]
+    end
+
+    subgraph Requirements
+        BR[Business<br/>Requirements<br/>[BR_COUNT] BR]
+        FR[Functional<br/>Requirements<br/>[FR_COUNT] FR]
+        NFR[Non-Functional<br/>Requirements<br/>[NFR_COUNT] NFR]
+        INT[Integration<br/>Requirements<br/>[INT_COUNT] INT]
+        DR[Data<br/>Requirements<br/>[DR_COUNT] DR]
+    end
+
+    subgraph Design
+        Research[Technology<br/>Research<br/>Build vs Buy]
+        Wardley[Wardley<br/>Maps<br/>Evolution]
+        Diagrams[Architecture<br/>Diagrams<br/>C4 + Deployment]
+    end
+
+    subgraph Procurement
+        SOW[Statement<br/>of Work]
+        Evaluation[Vendor<br/>Evaluation]
+        HLD[HLD<br/>Review]
+        DLD[DLD<br/>Review]
+    end
+
+    subgraph Delivery
+        Stories[User<br/>Stories<br/>[STORY_COUNT] stories]
+        Sprints[Sprint<br/>Backlog<br/>[SPRINT_COUNT] sprints]
+        ServiceNow[ServiceNow<br/>Design<br/>CMDB + SLA]
+    end
+
+    subgraph Compliance
+        TCoP[Technology<br/>Code of Practice]
+        ServiceAssessment[GDS Service<br/>Standard]
+        Secure[Secure by<br/>Design]
+        AIPlaybook[AI<br/>Playbook]
+        ATRS[ATRS<br/>Record]
+    end
+
+    subgraph Governance
+        Traceability[Traceability<br/>Matrix<br/>[PERCENTAGE]% coverage]
+        Analysis[Quality<br/>Analysis<br/>Report]
+    end
+
+    Principles --> SOBC
+    Stakeholders --> SOBC
+    Stakeholders --> BR
+    SOBC --> BR
+    BR --> FR
+    BR --> NFR
+    DataModel --> DR
+
+    FR --> Research
+    NFR --> Research
+    Research --> Wardley
+    Wardley --> Diagrams
+    FR --> Diagrams
+
+    BR --> SOW
+    FR --> SOW
+    NFR --> SOW
+    Principles --> Evaluation
+    SOW --> Evaluation
+    Evaluation --> HLD
+    HLD --> DLD
+
+    FR --> Stories
+    Stories --> Sprints
+    Diagrams --> ServiceNow
+    NFR --> ServiceNow
+
+    SOW --> TCoP
+    Diagrams --> Secure
+    NFR --> Secure
+    Research --> AIPlaybook
+    AIPlaybook --> ATRS
+
+    BR --> Traceability
+    FR --> Traceability
+    NFR --> Traceability
+    DR --> Traceability
+    Stories --> Traceability
+    Sprints --> Traceability
+
+    Traceability --> Analysis
+    Risk --> Analysis
+
+    style Principles fill:#fff4e6
+    style SOBC fill:#e3f2fd
+    style BR fill:#e1f5e1
+    style Research fill:#f3e5f5
+    style SOW fill:#fce4ec
+    style Stories fill:#e8f5e9
+    style TCoP fill:#fff3e0
+    style Traceability fill:#f1f8e9
+```
+
+### Traceability Matrix Summary
+
+| From | To | Count | Coverage |
+|------|-----|-------|----------|
+| Stakeholder Goals | Business Requirements | [N] | [PERCENTAGE]% |
+| Business Requirements | Functional Requirements | [N] | [PERCENTAGE]% |
+| Business Requirements | Non-Functional Requirements | [N] | [PERCENTAGE]% |
+| Requirements (All) | User Stories | [N] | [PERCENTAGE]% |
+| User Stories | Sprint Backlog | [N] | [PERCENTAGE]% |
+| Requirements | Architecture Components | [N] | [PERCENTAGE]% |
+| Architecture Components | CMDB CIs | [N] | [PERCENTAGE]% |
+| Data Requirements | Data Model Entities | [N] | [PERCENTAGE]% |
+| Requirements | Test Cases | [N] | [PERCENTAGE]% |
+
+**Overall Traceability Coverage**: [PERCENTAGE]%
+
+[Analysis: "Full traceability achieved from stakeholder needs through to delivery sprints" or "Gap in traceability between [ARTIFACT_A] and [ARTIFACT_B] due to [REASON]"]
+
+---
+
+## Key Outcomes & Achievements
+
+### Strategic Outcomes
+
+Based on stakeholder analysis, the project delivered the following strategic outcomes:
+
+| Outcome ID | Outcome Description | Target Metric | Achievement | Status |
+|------------|-------------------|---------------|-------------|--------|
+| [OUT-001] | [Description] | [Target] | [Result] | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
+| [OUT-002] | [Description] | [Target] | [Result] | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
+| [OUT-003] | [Description] | [Target] | [Result] | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
+
+### Governance Achievements
+
+```mermaid
+mindmap
+  root((Project<br/>Achievements))
+    Foundation
+      Architecture Principles Established
+      [N] Stakeholders Engaged
+      [M] Risks Managed
+    Business Case
+      SOBC Approved
+      [NPV] NPV
+      [BCR] BCR
+      Data Model GDPR Compliant
+    Requirements
+      [TOTAL] Requirements Defined
+      [PERCENTAGE]% Must-have Requirements
+      [N] System Integrations
+    Strategic Planning
+      Build vs Buy Decision Made
+      Wardley Maps Created
+      C4 Architecture Defined
+    Procurement
+      Vendor Selected via [ROUTE]
+      [N] Vendors Evaluated
+      [SCORE]/100 Winner Score
+    Design
+      HLD Approved
+      DLD Approved
+      Implementation-ready
+    Delivery
+      [N] User Stories
+      [M] Sprints Planned
+      ServiceNow Designed
+    Compliance
+      [X] Compliance Frameworks Satisfied
+      [Y]% Traceability Coverage
+      Governance Quality Verified
+```
+
+### Technology Decisions
+
+| Decision | Option Chosen | Rationale | Principle Alignment |
+|----------|--------------|-----------|-------------------|
+| Build vs Buy | [BUILD/BUY/HYBRID] | [Rationale based on Wardley evolution] | [Principle X] |
+| Cloud Provider | [AWS/Azure/GCP/Multi-cloud] | [Rationale] | Point 5 (Cloud First) |
+| Architecture Style | [Microservices/Monolith/Serverless] | [Rationale] | [Principle Y] |
+| Integration Approach | [API/Event-driven/Batch] | [Rationale] | [Principle Z] |
+| Data Storage | [RDS/NoSQL/Data Lake] | [Rationale] | [Principle A] |
+
+### Benefits Realization
+
+**Economic Benefits** (from SOBC):
+
+- **NPV**: [VALUE] over [YEARS] years
+- **ROI**: [PERCENTAGE]%
+- **Payback Period**: [MONTHS] months
+- **Benefit-Cost Ratio**: [BCR]
+
+**Non-Economic Benefits**:
+
+- [BENEFIT_1: e.g., "Improved citizen satisfaction"]
+- [BENEFIT_2: e.g., "Reduced operational risk"]
+- [BENEFIT_3: e.g., "Enhanced data security"]
+
+---
+
+## Appendices
+
+### Appendix A: Artifact Register
+
+Complete list of all artifacts generated during this project:
+
+| # | Artifact | Location | Date Created | Command | Status |
+|---|----------|----------|--------------|---------|--------|
+| 1 | Architecture Principles | `projects/000-global/ARC-000-PRIN-v*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:principles` | ✅ |
+| 2 | Stakeholder Drivers | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STKE-v*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:stakeholders` | ✅ |
+| 3 | Risk Register | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-RISK-v*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:risk` | ✅ |
+| 4 | SOBC | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-SOBC-v*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:sobc` | ✅ |
+| 5 | Data Model | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-DATA-v*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:data-model` | ✅ |
+| 6 | Requirements | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-REQ-v*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:requirements` | ✅ |
+| 7 | Research Findings | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-RSCH-v*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:research` | ✅ |
+| 8 | Wardley Maps | `projects/{project_id}/wardley-maps/ARC-*-WARD-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:wardley` | ✅ |
+| 9 | Architecture Diagrams | `projects/{project_id}/diagrams/ARC-*-DIAG-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:diagram` | ✅ |
+| 10 | Statement of Work | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-SOW-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:sow` | ✅ |
+| 11 | Evaluation Criteria | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-EVAL-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:evaluate` | ✅ |
+| 12 | Vendor Scoring | `projects/{project_id}/vendors/*/scoring.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:evaluate` | ✅ |
+| 13 | HLD Review | `projects/{project_id}/vendors/[vendor]/reviews/ARC-*-HLDR-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:hld-review` | ✅ |
+| 14 | DLD Review | `projects/{project_id}/vendors/[vendor]/reviews/ARC-*-DLDR-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:dld-review` | ✅ |
+| 15 | Product Backlog | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-BKLG-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:backlog` | ✅ |
+| 16 | ServiceNow Design | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-SNOW-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:servicenow` | ✅ |
+| 17 | TCoP Review | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-TCOP-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:tcop` | ✅ |
+| 18 | Service Assessment | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-SVCASS-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:service-assessment` | ✅ |
+| 19 | Secure by Design | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-SECD-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:secure` | ✅ |
+| 20 | AI Playbook | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-AIPB-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:ai-playbook` | ✅ |
+| 21 | ATRS Record | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-ATRS-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:atrs` | ✅ |
+| 22 | Traceability Matrix | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-TRAC-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:traceability` | ✅ |
+| 23 | Analysis Report | `projects/{project_id}/ARC-*-ANAL-*.md` | [DATE] | `/arckit:analyze` | ✅ |
+
+**Total Artifacts**: [N]
+
+### Appendix B: Chronological Activity Log
+
+Complete chronological log of all project activities extracted from git history:
+
+```text
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:principles - Architecture Principles Established
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:stakeholders - Stakeholder Analysis: [N] stakeholders, [M] goals, [P] outcomes
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:risk - Risk Register: [TOTAL] risks identified ([HIGH] high, [MEDIUM] medium, [LOW] low)
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:sobc - Strategic Outline Business Case: NPV [VALUE], BCR [RATIO]
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:data-model - Data Model: [N] entities, [M] relationships, GDPR compliant
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:requirements - Requirements: [BR] BR, [FR] FR, [NFR] NFR, [INT] INT, [DR] DR
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:research - Technology Research: [N] options evaluated, decision: [BUILD/BUY]
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:wardley - Wardley Map: [MAP_NAME] created
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:diagram - Architecture Diagram: [DIAGRAM_TYPE] created
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:sow - Statement of Work: Scope defined for [PROCUREMENT_ROUTE]
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:evaluate - Vendor Evaluation: [N] vendors scored, winner: [VENDOR_NAME] ([SCORE]/100)
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:hld-review - HLD Review: [VERDICT] with [N] findings
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:dld-review - DLD Review: [VERDICT] with [N] findings
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:backlog - Product Backlog: [N] stories across [M] sprints
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:servicenow - ServiceNow Design: [N] CIs, [M] SLAs defined
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:tcop - TCoP Review: [N]/13 points satisfied
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:service-assessment - Service Assessment: [N]/14 points satisfied, [READY/NOT READY]
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:secure - Secure by Design: NCSC CAF [N]/14 principles, Cyber Essentials [LEVEL]
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:ai-playbook - AI Playbook: [N] ethical principles assessed
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:atrs - ATRS Record: Transparency record published
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:traceability - Traceability Matrix: [PERCENTAGE]% coverage achieved
+[DATE] [TIME] - /arckit:analyze - Quality Analysis: [N] artifacts analyzed, [FINDINGS]
+```
+
+### Appendix C: Dependency Structure Matrix
+
+Visual representation of artifact dependencies:
+
+```mermaid
+flowchart LR
+    subgraph Legend
+        M[M = Mandatory]
+        R[R = Recommended]
+        O[O = Optional]
+    end
+
+    Principles -->|M| Stakeholders
+    Principles -->|M| SOBC
+    Principles -->|M| Evaluation
+
+    Stakeholders -->|M| Risk
+    Stakeholders -->|M| Requirements
+    Stakeholders -->|R| SOBC
+
+    Risk -->|R| SOBC
+    Risk -->|M| HLD
+    Risk -->|M| DLD
+
+    SOBC -->|M| Requirements
+    SOBC -->|R| SOW
+
+    Requirements -->|M| Research
+    Requirements -->|M| Diagrams
+    Requirements -->|M| SOW
+    Requirements -->|M| Stories
+    Requirements -->|M| Traceability
+
+    DataModel -->|M| Requirements
+    DataModel -->|R| ServiceNow
+
+    Research -->|M| Wardley
+    Wardley -->|R| SOW
+
+    Diagrams -->|M| HLD
+    Diagrams -->|R| ServiceNow
+
+    SOW -->|M| Evaluation
+    Evaluation -->|M| HLD
+
+    HLD -->|M| DLD
+    DLD -->|M| Backlog
+
+    Stories -->|M| Sprints
+    Sprints -->|R| ServiceNow
+
+    Requirements -->|R| Compliance
+    Diagrams -->|R| Compliance
+
+    Traceability -->|M| Analysis
+
+    style Principles fill:#fff4e6
+    style Requirements fill:#e1f5e1
+    style SOW fill:#fce4ec
+    style HLD fill:#f3e5f5
+    style Traceability fill:#f1f8e9
+```
+
+### Appendix D: Command Reference
+
+ArcKit commands used in this project:
+
+| Command | Purpose | When to Use |
+|---------|---------|-------------|
+| `/arckit:principles` | Establish architecture principles | Start of program/project |
+| `/arckit:stakeholders` | Analyze stakeholders, goals, outcomes | After principles, before requirements |
+| `/arckit:risk` | Create risk register (HM Treasury Orange Book) | After stakeholder analysis |
+| `/arckit:sobc` | Strategic Outline Business Case (Green Book) | Before detailed requirements |
+| `/arckit:data-model` | Define data model, ERD, GDPR compliance | With requirements definition |
+| `/arckit:requirements` | Define BR/FR/NFR/INT/DR requirements | After business case |
+| `/arckit:research` | Research technology options, build vs buy | After requirements |
+| `/arckit:wardley` | Create Wardley Maps for strategic planning | With research phase |
+| `/arckit:diagram` | Generate C4/deployment/sequence diagrams | After requirements/research |
+| `/arckit:sow` | Create Statement of Work (RFP) | After research, before procurement |
+| `/arckit:evaluate` | Vendor evaluation framework | With procurement |
+| `/arckit:hld-review` | Review vendor High-Level Design | After vendor selection |
+| `/arckit:dld-review` | Review vendor Detailed Design | After HLD approval |
+| `/arckit:backlog` | Convert requirements to user stories | After design review |
+| `/arckit:servicenow` | Design CMDB, SLAs, incident management | With delivery planning |
+| `/arckit:tcop` | Technology Code of Practice (UK Gov) | Before go-live |
+| `/arckit:service-assessment` | GDS Service Standard (UK Gov) | Before Alpha/Beta/Live assessment |
+| `/arckit:secure` | Secure by Design (NCSC CAF, Cyber Essentials) | Throughout project |
+| `/arckit:ai-playbook` | AI Playbook assessment (UK Gov AI systems) | For AI/ML projects |
+| `/arckit:atrs` | Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard | For algorithmic tools |
+| `/arckit:traceability` | End-to-end traceability matrix | After all artifacts created |
+| `/arckit:analyze` | Governance quality analysis | Final governance validation |
+
+### Appendix E: Glossary
+
+| Term | Definition |
+|------|------------|
+| **ArcKit** | The Enterprise Architecture Governance Harness |
+| **BR** | Business Requirement |
+| **FR** | Functional Requirement |
+| **NFR** | Non-Functional Requirement (Performance, Security, Scalability, Availability, Compliance) |
+| **INT** | Integration Requirement |
+| **DR** | Data Requirement |
+| **SOBC** | Strategic Outline Business Case (Green Book 5-case model) |
+| **TCoP** | Technology Code of Practice (13 points for UK Gov) |
+| **GDS** | Government Digital Service |
+| **NCSC CAF** | National Cyber Security Centre Cyber Assessment Framework |
+| **UK GDPR** | UK General Data Protection Regulation |
+| **ATRS** | Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard |
+| **HLD** | High-Level Design |
+| **DLD** | Detailed Design |
+| **C4** | Context, Container, Component, Code (architecture diagram model) |
+| **CMDB** | Configuration Management Database |
+| **SLA** | Service Level Agreement |
+| **Wardley Map** | Strategic tool for visualizing component evolution and positioning |
+
+---
+
+---
+
+*This document provides a comprehensive narrative of the project journey through the ArcKit governance framework, with detailed timeline analysis, traceability chains, and governance achievements. It serves as both a historical record and a demonstration of systematic architecture governance.*
+
+## External References
+
+> This section provides traceability from generated content back to source documents.
+> Follow citation instructions in the project's citation reference guide.
+
+### Document Register
+
+| Doc ID | Filename | Type | Source Location | Description |
+|--------|----------|------|-----------------|-------------|
+| *None provided* | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Citations
+
+| Citation ID | Doc ID | Page/Section | Category | Quoted Passage |
+|-------------|--------|--------------|----------|----------------|
+| — | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Unreferenced Documents
+
+| Filename | Source Location | Reason |
+|----------|-----------------|--------|
+| — | — | — |
+
+---
+
+**Generated by**: ArcKit `/arckit:story` command
+**Generated on**: [DATE]
+**ArcKit Version**: [VERSION]
+**Project**: [PROJECT_NAME]
+**Model**: [AI_MODEL]