arckit-cli 6.1.1__py3-none-any.whl

arckit_cli-6.1.1.data/data/share/arckit/.arckit/templates/uk-fs-ctp-dependency-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,321 @@
+# UK FS Critical Third Parties (CTP) Dependency Assessment
+
+> **Template Origin**: Community | **ArcKit Version**: [VERSION] | **Command**: `/arckit:uk-fs-ctp-dependency`
+
+## Document Control
+
+<!-- Default: OFFICIAL. Upgrade to OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE if this document reveals specific contractual
+     exit terms, proprietary resilience-test outcomes, or provider-specific vulnerabilities that
+     could be exploited if disclosed. Driven by user_config.default_classification. -->
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| **Document ID** | {{DOCUMENT_ID}} |
+| **Document Type** | UK FS CTP Dependency Assessment |
+| **Project** | {{PROJECT_NAME}} |
+| **Classification** | {{CLASSIFICATION}} |
+| **Status** | DRAFT |
+| **Version** | 1.0 |
+| **Created Date** | {{CREATED_DATE}} |
+| **Last Modified** | {{LAST_MODIFIED_DATE}} |
+| **Review Cycle** | Annual (minimum); review immediately on any new HMT designation or material change to provider relationship |
+| **Next Review Date** | {{NEXT_REVIEW_DATE}} |
+| **Owner** | {{DOCUMENT_OWNER_ROLE}} — {{DOCUMENT_OWNER_NAME}} |
+| **Reviewed By** | PENDING |
+| **Approved By** | PENDING |
+| **Distribution** | {{DISTRIBUTION}} |
+| **Firm Authorisation / Registration Type** | {{FIRM_AUTHORISATION_TYPE}} |
+| **FCA Firm Reference Number** | {{FCA_FRN}} |
+| **SMF Holder (Operational Resilience)** | {{SMF_HOLDER_NAME}} — {{SMF_HOLDER_FUNCTION}} |
+
+## Revision History
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approved By | Approval Date |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|-------------|---------------|
+| 1.0 | {{CREATED_DATE}} | ArcKit AI | Initial creation from `/arckit:uk-fs-ctp-dependency` command | PENDING | PENDING |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+{{EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY_PARAGRAPH_1}}
+
+{{EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY_PARAGRAPH_2}}
+
+{{EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY_PARAGRAPH_3}}
+
+> ⚠️ This document is a **working assessment** — not a regulatory submission. All CTP dependency
+> assessments must be reviewed and signed off by qualified UK FS regulatory counsel, the firm's
+> SMF holder for operational resilience (typically SMF24 — Chief Operations Function — at larger
+> firms; SMF1 — CEO — at smaller firms), and the firm's Compliance Officer before presentation to
+> the Board or submission to regulators. MLRO review is required only where a CTP relationship
+> directly affects AML or sanctions screening capability. Regulatory citations reflect the position
+> as at the document creation date; verify against current BoE, PRA, and FCA publications — in
+> particular the HMT designation list — before reliance.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Regulatory Context
+
+### 1.1 The CTP Regime
+
+The Critical Third Parties (CTP) regime was introduced by the **Financial Services and Markets Act
+2023 (FSMA 2023)**, which granted the Bank of England, PRA, and FCA powers in relation to CTPs.
+The joint policy statement **BoE/PRA/FCA PS24/16** (published 12 November 2024) set out the final
+rules and became effective **1 January 2025**.
+
+The regime addresses systemic risk from third-party service providers: disruption to or failure of
+a CTP — such as a cyber-attack, power outage, or technology failure — could affect many consumers
+and firms simultaneously if multiple financial sector participants rely on the same provider.
+
+### 1.2 Statutory Basis
+
+| Instrument | Role |
+|-----------|------|
+| Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (FSMA 2023) | Primary legislation granting HMT, BoE, PRA, and FCA powers over CTPs |
+| BoE/PRA/FCA PS24/16 (effective 1 Jan 2025) | Final rules establishing CTP oversight framework |
+| FCA 2024/41 — CTP Sourcebook instrument | FCA Sourcebook rules implementing PS24/16 |
+| HMT Designation Regulations | Secondary legislation by which HMT formally designates CTPs following regulator recommendation |
+
+### 1.3 Designation Process
+
+The Bank of England, PRA, and FCA may recommend a third-party provider to HMT for designation as
+a CTP. HMT takes the formal designation decision following engagement with the third-party supplier,
+regulators, and stakeholders. Designation confers regulatory obligations directly on the CTP, as
+well as heightened oversight obligations on firms that rely on designated CTPs.
+
+**The designation list is still maturing.** The firm must verify the current HMT designation status
+of each provider in this assessment before relying on it.
+
+### 1.4 Firm Context
+
+{{FIRM_CONTEXT_AND_IN_SCOPE_SERVICES_NARRATIVE}}
+
+---
+
+## 2. Firm's Reliance on Designated CTPs
+
+*List each designated CTP the firm consumes services from. If the firm does not rely on any
+currently-designated CTP, state "None currently designated — see §3 for material non-CTP providers"
+with explicit justification.*
+
+{{DESIGNATED_CTP_RELIANCE_NARRATIVE}}
+
+| Provider | Designation status | Services consumed | Important Business Services affected |
+|----------|--------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------|
+| {{DESIGNATED_PROVIDER_1_NAME}} | Designated CTP | {{DESIGNATED_PROVIDER_1_SERVICES}} | {{DESIGNATED_PROVIDER_1_IBS}} |
+| {{DESIGNATED_PROVIDER_2_NAME}} | Designated CTP | {{DESIGNATED_PROVIDER_2_SERVICES}} | {{DESIGNATED_PROVIDER_2_IBS}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+---
+
+## 3. Non-Designated Material Third Parties
+
+Providers that are not formally designated CTPs but that materially affect the firm's operational
+resilience — because a failure would breach an Important Business Service (IBS) impact tolerance —
+are still in scope for this assessment. They may become formally designated CTPs as HMT extends
+designation over time.
+
+{{NON_DESIGNATED_MATERIAL_THIRD_PARTIES_NARRATIVE}}
+
+| Provider | Capability category | Why material | IBS affected |
+|----------|--------------------|--------------|--------------|
+| {{MATERIAL_NON_CTP_1_NAME}} | {{MATERIAL_NON_CTP_1_CATEGORY}} | {{MATERIAL_NON_CTP_1_WHY_MATERIAL}} | {{MATERIAL_NON_CTP_1_IBS}} |
+| {{MATERIAL_NON_CTP_2_NAME}} | {{MATERIAL_NON_CTP_2_CATEGORY}} | {{MATERIAL_NON_CTP_2_WHY_MATERIAL}} | {{MATERIAL_NON_CTP_2_IBS}} |
+| {{MATERIAL_NON_CTP_3_NAME}} | {{MATERIAL_NON_CTP_3_CATEGORY}} | {{MATERIAL_NON_CTP_3_WHY_MATERIAL}} | {{MATERIAL_NON_CTP_3_IBS}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+---
+
+## 4. Materiality Assessment Methodology
+
+The firm scores the materiality of each third-party dependency across four dimensions. Providers
+scoring 11 or above are treated as material regardless of formal CTP designation status.
+
+| Dimension | Description | Score range |
+|-----------|-------------|-------------|
+| IBS dependency | Proportion of the firm's Important Business Services that would fail if this provider were unavailable | 1 (none) to 5 (all IBS) |
+| Substitution difficulty | How hard it is to substitute this provider in the short term | 1 (commodity, easy) to 5 (proprietary, long lead time) |
+| Recovery time impact | How long the firm would operate below its IBS tolerance if the provider failed | 1 (<1 hour) to 5 (>72 hours) |
+| Concentration risk contribution | Does this provider increase geographic, vendor, or functional concentration? | 1 (no contribution) to 5 (sole provider for this capability or geography) |
+
+**Overall materiality score** = sum of four dimensions (range 4–20).
+
+| Score band | Materiality tier | Treatment |
+|------------|-----------------|-----------|
+| 16–20 | Critical | Treat as designated CTP equivalent regardless of formal designation |
+| 11–15 | High | Material non-CTP: enhanced monitoring and annual substitution drill required |
+| 6–10 | Medium | Monitor: document Nth-party risks; biennial substitution drill |
+| 4–5 | Low | Maintain basic continuity plan |
+
+### Materiality Score Summary
+
+| Provider | IBS dependency | Substitution difficulty | Recovery time impact | Concentration contribution | Total score | Tier |
+|----------|---------------|------------------------|---------------------|---------------------------|-------------|------|
+| {{SCORING_PROVIDER_1_NAME}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_1_IBS}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_1_SUBS}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_1_RT}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_1_CONC}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_1_TOTAL}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_1_TIER}} |
+| {{SCORING_PROVIDER_2_NAME}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_2_IBS}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_2_SUBS}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_2_RT}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_2_CONC}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_2_TOTAL}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_2_TIER}} |
+| {{SCORING_PROVIDER_3_NAME}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_3_IBS}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_3_SUBS}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_3_RT}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_3_CONC}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_3_TOTAL}} | {{SCORING_PROVIDER_3_TIER}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+---
+
+## 5. Dependency Register
+
+*The per-provider register blocks below are instantiated from the
+`uk-fs-ctp-dependency-register-template.md` partial. One block per provider in scope.*
+
+{{INSERT_DEPENDENCY_REGISTER_HERE}}
+
+---
+
+## 6. Resilience Testing Plan
+
+### 6.1 Exit Drills
+
+Exit drills test whether the firm can substitute a provider within the firm's IBS impact tolerance
+without relying on the provider's own cooperation.
+
+| Provider | Drill type | Planned frequency | Last conducted | Next planned date | Accountable SMF |
+|----------|-----------|-------------------|----------------|-------------------|-----------------|
+| {{EXIT_DRILL_PROVIDER_1}} | Full exit simulation | Annual | {{EXIT_DRILL_PROVIDER_1_LAST_DATE}} | {{EXIT_DRILL_PROVIDER_1_NEXT_DATE}} | {{EXIT_DRILL_PROVIDER_1_SMF}} |
+| {{EXIT_DRILL_PROVIDER_2}} | Tabletop exercise | Annual | {{EXIT_DRILL_PROVIDER_2_LAST_DATE}} | {{EXIT_DRILL_PROVIDER_2_NEXT_DATE}} | {{EXIT_DRILL_PROVIDER_2_SMF}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+### 6.2 Substitution Drills
+
+Substitution drills validate that the firm can invoke a secondary provider and restore IBS within
+the agreed recovery time objective.
+
+| Provider | Secondary provider | Last substitution drill date | Drill outcome | Recovery time achieved | Gap to IBS tolerance |
+|----------|--------------------|------------------------------|---------------|------------------------|----------------------|
+| {{SUBS_DRILL_PROVIDER_1}} | {{SUBS_DRILL_SECONDARY_1}} | {{SUBS_DRILL_DATE_1}} | {{SUBS_DRILL_OUTCOME_1}} | {{SUBS_DRILL_RTO_ACHIEVED_1}} | {{SUBS_DRILL_GAP_1}} |
+| {{SUBS_DRILL_PROVIDER_2}} | {{SUBS_DRILL_SECONDARY_2}} | {{SUBS_DRILL_DATE_2}} | {{SUBS_DRILL_OUTCOME_2}} | {{SUBS_DRILL_RTO_ACHIEVED_2}} | {{SUBS_DRILL_GAP_2}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+### 6.3 Scenario Tests
+
+| Scenario | Providers affected | Last test date | Outcome | Remediation actions |
+|----------|--------------------|----------------|---------|---------------------|
+| {{SCENARIO_1_NAME}} | {{SCENARIO_1_PROVIDERS}} | {{SCENARIO_1_DATE}} | {{SCENARIO_1_OUTCOME}} | {{SCENARIO_1_ACTIONS}} |
+| {{SCENARIO_2_NAME}} | {{SCENARIO_2_PROVIDERS}} | {{SCENARIO_2_DATE}} | {{SCENARIO_2_OUTCOME}} | {{SCENARIO_2_ACTIONS}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+### 6.4 Testing Cadence and Evidence Retention
+
+| Tier | Drill type | Minimum frequency | Evidence retained | Retention period |
+|------|-----------|-------------------|-------------------|------------------|
+| Critical (score 16–20) | Full exit drill + scenario test | Annual | Test plan, outcomes, remediation log | {{DRILL_EVIDENCE_RETENTION_PERIOD}} |
+| High (score 11–15) | Substitution drill | Annual | Outcomes and gap analysis | {{DRILL_EVIDENCE_RETENTION_PERIOD}} |
+| Medium (score 6–10) | Tabletop exercise | Biennial | Exercise notes | {{DRILL_EVIDENCE_RETENTION_PERIOD}} |
+| Low (score 4–5) | Continuity plan review | Biennial | Review sign-off | {{DRILL_EVIDENCE_RETENTION_PERIOD}} |
+
+---
+
+## 7. Concentration Risk Analysis
+
+### 7.1 Geographic Concentration
+
+{{GEOGRAPHIC_CONCENTRATION_NARRATIVE}}
+
+| Risk | Providers affected | Maximum correlated failure scenario | Mitigation |
+|------|-------------------|-------------------------------------|------------|
+| {{GEO_RISK_1_DESCRIPTION}} | {{GEO_RISK_1_PROVIDERS}} | {{GEO_RISK_1_FAILURE_SCENARIO}} | {{GEO_RISK_1_MITIGATION}} |
+| {{GEO_RISK_2_DESCRIPTION}} | {{GEO_RISK_2_PROVIDERS}} | {{GEO_RISK_2_FAILURE_SCENARIO}} | {{GEO_RISK_2_MITIGATION}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+### 7.2 Vendor Concentration
+
+{{VENDOR_CONCENTRATION_NARRATIVE}}
+
+| Risk | Vendor / parent entity | Capabilities affected | Mitigation |
+|------|------------------------|----------------------|------------|
+| {{VENDOR_RISK_1_DESCRIPTION}} | {{VENDOR_RISK_1_ENTITY}} | {{VENDOR_RISK_1_CAPABILITIES}} | {{VENDOR_RISK_1_MITIGATION}} |
+| {{VENDOR_RISK_2_DESCRIPTION}} | {{VENDOR_RISK_2_ENTITY}} | {{VENDOR_RISK_2_CAPABILITIES}} | {{VENDOR_RISK_2_MITIGATION}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+### 7.3 Functional Concentration
+
+{{FUNCTIONAL_CONCENTRATION_NARRATIVE}}
+
+| Function | Sole provider? | Secondary provider | Accepted risk or active mitigation |
+|----------|---------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------|
+| {{FUNC_CONCENTRATION_1_FUNCTION}} | {{FUNC_CONCENTRATION_1_SOLE}} | {{FUNC_CONCENTRATION_1_SECONDARY}} | {{FUNC_CONCENTRATION_1_MITIGATION}} |
+| {{FUNC_CONCENTRATION_2_FUNCTION}} | {{FUNC_CONCENTRATION_2_SOLE}} | {{FUNC_CONCENTRATION_2_SECONDARY}} | {{FUNC_CONCENTRATION_2_MITIGATION}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+---
+
+## 8. Reporting Obligations
+
+### 8.1 When the Firm Must Notify Regulators
+
+| Event | Notification recipient | Timing | Basis |
+|-------|----------------------|--------|-------|
+| Material service disruption from a designated CTP | FCA and PRA / BoE as applicable | As soon as practicable | PS24/16 CTP oversight framework |
+| Change in reliance on a designated CTP that materially affects IBS | FCA | Within agreed notification window | PS24/16 |
+| Discovery of a previously unidentified designated CTP dependency | FCA | At next scheduled review or sooner | PS24/16 |
+| {{FIRM_SPECIFIC_NOTIFICATION_TRIGGER}} | {{FIRM_SPECIFIC_NOTIFICATION_RECIPIENT}} | {{FIRM_SPECIFIC_NOTIFICATION_TIMING}} | {{FIRM_SPECIFIC_NOTIFICATION_BASIS}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+### 8.2 Internal Reporting
+
+| Report | Recipient | Frequency | Owner |
+|--------|-----------|-----------|-------|
+| CTP dependency register review | Board / Risk Committee | Annual (minimum) | {{INTERNAL_REPORT_1_OWNER}} |
+| Resilience test outcomes | SMF holder (Operational Resilience) | After each drill | {{INTERNAL_REPORT_2_OWNER}} |
+| Concentration risk dashboard | Board Risk Committee | Quarterly | {{INTERNAL_REPORT_3_OWNER}} |
+| New HMT designations — impact assessment | Compliance / SMF holder | Within 30 days of new designation | {{INTERNAL_REPORT_4_OWNER}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+---
+
+## 9. Control Library References — FINOS Common Cloud Controls
+
+For CTPs that are cloud service providers, the **FINOS Common Cloud Controls (FINOS CCC)** project
+provides an open standard describing consistent, technology-neutral controls for compliant public
+cloud deployments in the financial services sector. FINOS CCC is a useful control-library reference
+when mapping which cloud controls apply to each CTP relationship. It is not an FCA or PRA
+regulatory mandate — cite it but do not treat it as a binding regulatory requirement.
+
+> **FINOS CCC reference**: <https://www.finos.org/common-cloud-controls-project>
+
+| Provider | FINOS CCC control categories applicable | Alignment assessment |
+|----------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------|
+| {{CCC_PROVIDER_1_NAME}} | {{CCC_PROVIDER_1_CATEGORIES}} | {{CCC_PROVIDER_1_ALIGNMENT}} |
+| {{CCC_PROVIDER_2_NAME}} | {{CCC_PROVIDER_2_CATEGORIES}} | {{CCC_PROVIDER_2_ALIGNMENT}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional rows as needed -->
+
+---
+
+## 10. References
+
+| Reference | Citation | URL |
+|-----------|----------|-----|
+| PS24/16 | BoE/PRA/FCA PS24/16 — Operational resilience: Critical third parties to the UK financial sector (published 12 Nov 2024, effective 1 Jan 2025) | <https://www.fca.org.uk/publications/policy-statements/ps24-16-operational-resilience-critical-third-parties-uk-financial-sector> |
+| FSMA 2023 | Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 — statutory basis for CTP powers | <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/29> |
+| HMT Designation | HM Treasury — Critical Third Parties: HMT's approach to designation (March 2024) | <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/critical-third-parties-hm-treasurys-approach-to-designation> |
+| FCA 2024/41 | FCA CTP Sourcebook instrument implementing PS24/16 | <https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/instrument/2024/FCA_2024_41.pdf> |
+| FINOS CCC | FINOS Common Cloud Controls — open cloud control library for financial services | <https://www.finos.org/common-cloud-controls-project> |
+| FCA Op Res | FCA Operational Resilience — firms guidance | <https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/operational-resilience> |
+
+---
+
+**Generated by**: ArcKit `/arckit:uk-fs-ctp-dependency` command
+**Generated on**: [DATE]
+**ArcKit Version**: [VERSION]
+**Project**: [PROJECT_NAME]
+**Model**: [AI_MODEL]

arckit_cli-6.1.1.data/data/share/arckit/.arckit/templates/uk-fs-safeguarding-reconciliation-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+## Reconciliation Cadence and Sign-Off Chain
+
+**Reconciliation frequency**: {{RECONCILIATION_FREQUENCY}}
+
+### Position Reconciliation Steps
+
+Position reconciliation compares the **safeguarded balance** (designated bank account balance) to
+the **client-money obligation** (sum of customer ledger balances).
+
+1. {{RECON_STEP_1_DESCRIPTION}} — owner: {{RECON_STEP_1_ROLE}}
+2. {{RECON_STEP_2_DESCRIPTION}} — owner: {{RECON_STEP_2_ROLE}}
+3. {{RECON_STEP_3_DESCRIPTION}} — owner: {{RECON_STEP_3_ROLE}}
+
+<!-- Add additional reconciliation steps as needed -->
+
+### Break Analysis Cadence and Ownership
+
+Break analysis investigates the individual transactions or postings that explain any reconciliation
+variance. The FCA expects firms to perform break analysis distinct from (and in addition to) the
+position reconciliation itself.
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| **Break analysis cadence** | {{BREAK_ANALYSIS_CADENCE}} |
+| **Break analysis owner** | {{BREAK_ANALYSIS_OWNER_ROLE}} |
+| **Break aging escalation threshold** | {{BREAK_AGING_ESCALATION_THRESHOLD}} |
+| **Break analysis evidence format** | {{BREAK_ANALYSIS_EVIDENCE_FORMAT}} |
+
+### Intraday Reconciliation (firms processing >£10m/day) — OPTIONAL
+
+*Complete this section if the firm processes more than £10m in relevant funds per business day,
+or if the FCA Approach Document (May 2026 edition) supervisory expectations otherwise apply. Mark
+N/A if the firm operates below the intraday-cadence threshold.*
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| **Intraday reconciliation applicable?** | {{INTRADAY_APPLICABLE}} |
+| **Intraday reconciliation frequency** | {{INTRADAY_FREQUENCY}} |
+| **Intraday cut-off windows** | {{INTRADAY_CUTOFF_WINDOWS}} |
+| **Intraday sign-off owner** | {{INTRADAY_SIGNOFF_OWNER_ROLE}} |
+| **Intraday variance escalation threshold** | {{INTRADAY_VARIANCE_ESCALATION_THRESHOLD}} |
+
+### Sign-Off Chain
+
+| Tier | Role | Trigger | SLA |
+|------|------|---------|-----|
+| 1 | {{TIER_1_ROLE}} | Daily close | {{TIER_1_SLA}} |
+| 2 | {{TIER_2_ROLE}} | Variance > {{TIER_2_VARIANCE_THRESHOLD}} | {{TIER_2_SLA}} |
+| 3 | {{TIER_3_ROLE}} | Variance > {{TIER_3_ESCALATION_THRESHOLD}} or repeat pattern | {{TIER_3_SLA}} |
+| 4 | {{TIER_4_SMF_HOLDER}} | Material shortfall (FCA notification triggered) | {{TIER_4_SLA}} |
+
+**Evidence retention**: 6 years (minimum per FCA SUP 16).
+
+### Variance Handling Protocol
+
+- Surplus: {{SURPLUS_PROCEDURE}}
+- Shortfall: {{SHORTFALL_PROCEDURE_INCLUDING_FCA_NOTIFICATION_TRIGGER}}
+- Unreconciled position older than {{UNRECONCILED_AGE_DAYS}} days: {{UNRECONCILED_ESCALATION_PROCEDURE}}
+
+### SUP 16 Annex 34A / 34B Field Mapping
+
+Map each FCA monthly safeguarding return field to the firm's source-of-truth data field, so the
+return can be produced directly from the reconciliation data without manual transcription. APIs
+submit Annex 34A; EMIs submit Annex 34B.
+
+<!-- Map each Annex 34A/34B column to the firm's source-of-truth data field. See
+https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/SUP/16/ for the current annex specification. -->
+
+| Annex 34A/34B field | Firm source-of-truth field | Source system | Calculation / aggregation |
+|---------------------|-----------------------------|---------------|----------------------------|
+| Total relevant funds held (period-end) | {{ANNEX_34_TOTAL_RELEVANT_FUNDS_SOURCE}} | {{ANNEX_34_TOTAL_RELEVANT_FUNDS_SYSTEM}} | {{ANNEX_34_TOTAL_RELEVANT_FUNDS_CALC}} |
+| Safeguarded balance (designated account) | {{ANNEX_34_SAFEGUARDED_BALANCE_SOURCE}} | {{ANNEX_34_SAFEGUARDED_BALANCE_SYSTEM}} | {{ANNEX_34_SAFEGUARDED_BALANCE_CALC}} |
+| Reconciliation variance (period-end) | {{ANNEX_34_VARIANCE_SOURCE}} | {{ANNEX_34_VARIANCE_SYSTEM}} | {{ANNEX_34_VARIANCE_CALC}} |
+| Number of breaks in period | {{ANNEX_34_BREAK_COUNT_SOURCE}} | {{ANNEX_34_BREAK_COUNT_SYSTEM}} | {{ANNEX_34_BREAK_COUNT_CALC}} |
+| Material shortfall events in period | {{ANNEX_34_SHORTFALL_EVENTS_SOURCE}} | {{ANNEX_34_SHORTFALL_EVENTS_SYSTEM}} | {{ANNEX_34_SHORTFALL_EVENTS_CALC}} |
+
+<!-- Add additional Annex field-mapping rows as the firm's submission template requires -->