arckit-cli 6.1.1__py3-none-any.whl

arckit_cli-6.1.1.data/data/share/arckit/.arckit/templates/requirements-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,1026 @@
+# Project Requirements: [PROJECT_NAME]
+
+> **Template Origin**: Official | **ArcKit Version**: [VERSION] | **Command**: `/arckit:requirements`
+
+## Document Control
+
+<!-- DOC-CONTROL-HEADER -->
+<!-- Resolved at command-execution time to _partials/document-control-uk.md or _partials/document-control-uae.md based on plugin userConfig classification_scheme + governance_framework. See _partials/RENDERING.md (when present). -->
+
+## Revision History
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approved By | Approval Date |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|-------------|---------------|
+| [VERSION] | [DATE] | ArcKit AI | Initial creation from `/arckit.[COMMAND]` command | [PENDING] | [PENDING] |
+
+## Document Purpose
+
+[Brief description of what this document is for and how it will be used]
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+### Business Context
+
+[2-3 paragraphs explaining why this project exists, the business problem being solved, and the strategic value to the organization]
+
+### Objectives
+
+[Bulleted list of 3-5 high-level objectives this project aims to achieve]
+
+- [Objective 1]
+- [Objective 2]
+- [Objective 3]
+
+### Expected Outcomes
+
+[Measurable business outcomes - revenue impact, cost savings, efficiency gains, customer satisfaction, etc.]
+
+- [Outcome 1 with metric]
+- [Outcome 2 with metric]
+- [Outcome 3 with metric]
+
+### Project Scope
+
+**In Scope**:
+
+- [Capability/feature that IS included]
+- [System/integration that IS included]
+- [User group/persona that IS included]
+
+**Out of Scope**:
+
+- [Capability explicitly excluded]
+- [Future phase work]
+- [Related but separate initiative]
+
+---
+
+## Stakeholders
+
+| Stakeholder | Role | Organization | Involvement Level |
+|-------------|------|--------------|-------------------|
+| [Name] | [Executive Sponsor] | [Dept] | Decision maker |
+| [Name] | [Product Owner] | [Dept] | Requirements definition |
+| [Name] | [Business Analyst] | [Dept] | Requirements elicitation |
+| [Name] | [Enterprise Architect] | Architecture | Technical oversight |
+| [Name] | [Security Lead] | Security | Security review |
+| [Name] | [Compliance Officer] | Compliance | Regulatory compliance |
+| [Name] | [End User Representative] | [Business Unit] | User acceptance |
+
+---
+
+## Business Requirements
+
+### BR-001: [Business Requirement Name]
+
+**Description**: [What the business needs to achieve from a value perspective]
+
+**Rationale**: [Why this is important to the business]
+
+**Success Criteria**:
+
+- [Measurable criterion 1]
+- [Measurable criterion 2]
+
+**Priority**: [MUST_HAVE | SHOULD_HAVE | COULD_HAVE | WONT_HAVE]
+
+**Stakeholder**: [Who requested/owns this requirement]
+
+---
+
+### BR-002: [Business Requirement Name]
+
+[Repeat structure above for each business requirement]
+
+---
+
+## Functional Requirements
+
+### User Personas
+
+#### Persona 1: [Persona Name]
+
+- **Role**: [Job title/role]
+- **Goals**: [What they want to accomplish]
+- **Pain Points**: [Current challenges]
+- **Technical Proficiency**: [Low | Medium | High]
+
+#### Persona 2: [Persona Name]
+
+[Repeat for each persona]
+
+---
+
+### Use Cases
+
+#### UC-1: [Use Case Name]
+
+**Actor**: [Primary user persona]
+
+**Preconditions**:
+
+- [System state before use case begins]
+- [User permissions required]
+
+**Main Flow**:
+
+1. User [action 1]
+2. System [response 1]
+3. User [action 2]
+4. System [response 2]
+5. [Continue step-by-step flow]
+
+**Postconditions**:
+
+- [System state after successful completion]
+- [Data changes that occurred]
+
+**Alternative Flows**:
+
+- **Alt 1a**: If [condition], then [alternative steps]
+- **Alt 2a**: If [error condition], then [error handling]
+
+**Exception Flows**:
+
+- **Ex 1**: [Error scenario and system behavior]
+
+**Business Rules**:
+
+- [Rule 1 that governs this use case]
+- [Rule 2 that constrains behavior]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+### Functional Requirements Detail
+
+#### FR-001: [Functional Requirement Name]
+
+**Description**: [What the system must do]
+
+**Relates To**: [BR-001, UC-1] (link to business requirements and use cases)
+
+**Acceptance Criteria**:
+
+- [ ] Given [context], when [action], then [expected result]
+- [ ] Given [context], when [action], then [expected result]
+- [ ] Edge case: [scenario and expected behavior]
+
+**Data Requirements**:
+
+- **Inputs**: [Data required for this function]
+- **Outputs**: [Data produced by this function]
+- **Validations**: [Data validation rules]
+
+**Priority**: [MUST_HAVE | SHOULD_HAVE | COULD_HAVE | WONT_HAVE] (MoSCoW)
+
+**Complexity**: [LOW | MEDIUM | HIGH]
+
+**Dependencies**: [Other requirements this depends on]
+
+**Assumptions**: [What we're assuming for this requirement]
+
+---
+
+#### FR-002: [Functional Requirement Name]
+
+[Repeat for each functional requirement - aim for 10-30 FRs depending on project size]
+
+---
+
+## Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs)
+
+### Performance Requirements
+
+#### NFR-P-001: Response Time
+
+**Requirement**: [Specific performance metric]
+
+- Web page load time: < 2 seconds (95th percentile)
+- API response time: < 200ms (95th percentile)
+- Database query time: < 100ms (average)
+
+**Measurement Method**: [How performance will be measured]
+
+**Load Conditions**: [Expected concurrent users, transaction volume]
+
+- Peak load: [X] concurrent users
+- Average load: [Y] transactions per second
+- Data volume: [Z] records in primary tables
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-P-002: Throughput
+
+**Requirement**: System must handle [X] transactions per second at peak load
+
+**Scalability**: Must scale horizontally to support 3x growth over 2 years
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+### Availability and Resilience Requirements
+
+#### NFR-A-001: Availability Target
+
+**Requirement**: System must achieve [99.9%] uptime (SLA)
+
+- Maximum planned downtime: [X hours/month] for maintenance
+- Maximum unplanned downtime: [Y hours/year]
+
+**Maintenance Windows**: [Allowed times for planned maintenance]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-A-002: Disaster Recovery
+
+**RPO (Recovery Point Objective)**: Maximum acceptable data loss = [X minutes]
+
+**RTO (Recovery Time Objective)**: Maximum acceptable downtime = [X hours]
+
+**Backup Requirements**:
+
+- Backup frequency: [Daily, hourly, continuous]
+- Backup retention: [X days/months/years]
+- Geographic backup location: [Region/datacenter requirements]
+
+**Failover Requirements**:
+
+- Automatic failover to secondary region: [YES | NO]
+- Failover time: < [X minutes]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-A-003: Fault Tolerance
+
+**Requirement**: System must gracefully degrade when [component] fails
+
+**Resilience Patterns Required**:
+
+- [ ] Circuit breaker for external dependencies
+- [ ] Retry with exponential backoff
+- [ ] Timeout on all network calls
+- [ ] Bulkhead isolation for critical resources
+- [ ] Graceful degradation with reduced functionality
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+### Scalability Requirements
+
+#### NFR-S-001: Horizontal Scaling
+
+**Requirement**: System must support horizontal scaling without code changes
+
+**Growth Projections**:
+
+- Year 1: [X users, Y transactions/day]
+- Year 2: [X users, Y transactions/day]
+- Year 3: [X users, Y transactions/day]
+
+**Scaling Triggers**: Auto-scale when CPU > 70% or memory > 80%
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-S-002: Data Volume Scaling
+
+**Requirement**: System must handle data growth to [X TB] over [Y years]
+
+**Data Archival Strategy**: [Hot/warm/cold storage tiers, archival after X months]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+### Security Requirements
+
+#### NFR-SEC-001: Authentication
+
+**Requirement**: All users must authenticate via [SSO | OAuth 2.0 | SAML 2.0]
+
+**Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)**:
+
+- Required for: [Admin users, privileged operations, external access]
+- MFA methods: [Authenticator app, SMS, hardware token]
+
+**Session Management**:
+
+- Session timeout: [X minutes] of inactivity
+- Absolute session timeout: [Y hours]
+- Re-authentication required for: [sensitive operations]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-SEC-002: Authorization
+
+**Requirement**: Role-based access control (RBAC) with least privilege principle
+
+**Roles and Permissions**: [Link to RACI matrix or detailed role definitions]
+
+**Privilege Elevation**: [Process for temporary elevated access]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-SEC-003: Data Encryption
+
+**Requirement**:
+
+- Data in transit: TLS 1.3+ with strong cipher suites
+- Data at rest: AES-256 encryption for all data stores
+- Key management: [AWS KMS | Azure Key Vault | HashiCorp Vault]
+
+**Encryption Scope**:
+
+- [ ] Database encryption at rest
+- [ ] Backup encryption
+- [ ] File storage encryption
+- [ ] Application-level field encryption for PII
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-SEC-004: Secrets Management
+
+**Requirement**: No secrets (API keys, passwords, certificates) in code or configuration files
+
+**Secrets Storage**: [HashiCorp Vault | AWS Secrets Manager | Azure Key Vault]
+
+**Secrets Rotation**: [Automatic rotation every X days]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-SEC-005: Vulnerability Management
+
+**Requirement**:
+
+- Dependency scanning in CI/CD pipeline (no critical/high vulnerabilities)
+- Static application security testing (SAST)
+- Dynamic application security testing (DAST)
+- Penetration testing: [Annually | Quarterly] by [internal | external] team
+
+**Remediation SLA**:
+
+- Critical vulnerabilities: [24 hours]
+- High vulnerabilities: [7 days]
+- Medium vulnerabilities: [30 days]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+### Compliance and Regulatory Requirements
+
+#### NFR-C-001: Data Privacy Compliance
+
+**Applicable Regulations**: [GDPR | CCPA | HIPAA | PCI-DSS | SOX | FedRAMP]
+
+**Compliance Requirements**:
+
+- [ ] Data subject rights (access, deletion, portability)
+- [ ] Consent management and audit trail
+- [ ] Privacy by design and by default
+- [ ] Data breach notification within [X hours]
+- [ ] Data protection impact assessment (DPIA) completed
+
+**Data Residency**: [EU data in EU, US data in US, etc.]
+
+**Data Retention**: [Automatic deletion after X days/months/years]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-C-002: Audit Logging
+
+**Requirement**: Comprehensive audit trail for compliance and forensics
+
+**Audit Log Contents** (for sensitive operations):
+
+- Who: User/service identity
+- What: Action performed
+- When: Timestamp (UTC, millisecond precision)
+- Where: System component
+- Why: Context (request ID, transaction ID)
+- Result: Success/failure with error details
+
+**Log Retention**: [7 years] for compliance logs (immutable storage)
+
+**Log Integrity**: Tamper-evident logging (cryptographic hashing)
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-C-003: Regulatory Reporting
+
+**Requirement**: System must generate compliance reports for [specific regulations]
+
+**Report Types**:
+
+- [Report 1]: [Frequency, recipient, format]
+- [Report 2]: [Frequency, recipient, format]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+### Usability Requirements
+
+#### NFR-U-001: User Experience
+
+**Requirement**: System must be intuitive for users with [proficiency level]
+
+**UX Standards**:
+
+- Consistent with [Design System Name]
+- Accessibility: WCAG 2.2 Level AA compliance
+- Mobile responsive design
+- Browser support: [Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge - last 2 versions]
+
+**User Onboarding**: [Interactive tutorial, contextual help, documentation]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-U-002: Accessibility
+
+**Requirement**: WCAG 2.2 Level AA compliance
+
+**Accessibility Features**:
+
+- [ ] Keyboard navigation for all functions
+- [ ] Screen reader compatibility
+- [ ] High contrast mode
+- [ ] Adjustable font sizes
+- [ ] Alt text for images
+- [ ] Captions for video/audio
+
+**Testing**: Automated accessibility testing in CI/CD + manual testing
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-U-003: Localization and Internationalization
+
+**Requirement**: Support for [list of languages and locales]
+
+**Localization Scope**:
+
+- [ ] UI text translation
+- [ ] Date/time format per locale
+- [ ] Currency formatting
+- [ ] Number formatting
+- [ ] Right-to-left (RTL) languages if applicable
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+### Maintainability and Supportability Requirements
+
+#### NFR-M-001: Observability
+
+**Requirement**: Comprehensive instrumentation for monitoring and troubleshooting
+
+**Telemetry Requirements**:
+
+- **Logging**: Structured JSON logs, centralized log aggregation
+- **Metrics**: Prometheus-compatible, RED metrics (Rate, Errors, Duration)
+- **Tracing**: Distributed tracing with OpenTelemetry
+- **Dashboards**: Real-time operational dashboards for key metrics
+- **Alerts**: SLO-based alerting with actionable runbooks
+
+**Log Levels**: DEBUG, INFO, WARN, ERROR, FATAL
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-M-002: Documentation
+
+**Requirement**: Comprehensive documentation for operators and developers
+
+**Documentation Types**:
+
+- [ ] Architecture documentation (C4 model)
+- [ ] API documentation (OpenAPI 3.0 specs)
+- [ ] Runbooks for operational procedures
+- [ ] Troubleshooting guides
+- [ ] User manuals
+- [ ] Admin guides
+
+**Documentation Format**: [Markdown in repo | Wiki | Confluence]
+
+**Documentation Currency**: Updated within [X days] of code changes
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-M-003: Operational Runbooks
+
+**Requirement**: Runbooks for common operational tasks and incident response
+
+**Runbook Coverage**:
+
+- [ ] Deployment procedures
+- [ ] Rollback procedures
+- [ ] Backup and restore procedures
+- [ ] Incident response for common failure modes
+- [ ] Scaling procedures (manual if not auto-scaled)
+- [ ] Disaster recovery procedures
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+### Portability and Interoperability Requirements
+
+#### NFR-I-001: API Standards
+
+**Requirement**: All APIs must follow [OpenAPI 3.0 | GraphQL] standards
+
+**API Design Principles**:
+
+- RESTful design with standard HTTP methods
+- JSON request/response format
+- Versioning via URL path (e.g., /v1/, /v2/)
+- Consistent error response format
+- HATEOAS for discoverability (if applicable)
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-I-002: Integration Capabilities
+
+**Requirement**: System must integrate with [list of external systems]
+
+**Integration Patterns**:
+
+- [ ] RESTful API integration
+- [ ] Event-driven integration (pub/sub)
+- [ ] File-based integration (SFTP, S3)
+- [ ] Database replication
+- [ ] Webhooks for real-time notifications
+
+**Integration SLA**: [X% success rate, Y minute latency]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### NFR-I-003: Data Portability
+
+**Requirement**: Users/administrators must be able to export their data
+
+**Export Formats**: [CSV, JSON, XML, PDF]
+
+**Export Scope**: [Complete data export vs. filtered export]
+
+**Import Capability**: [Support for bulk import from standard formats]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+## Integration Requirements
+
+### External System Integrations
+
+#### INT-001: Integration with [System Name]
+
+**Purpose**: [Why this integration is needed]
+
+**Integration Type**: [Real-time API | Batch file transfer | Event-driven | Database sync]
+
+**Data Exchanged**:
+
+- **From [This System] to [External System]**: [Data entities and frequency]
+- **From [External System] to [This System]**: [Data entities and frequency]
+
+**Integration Pattern**: [Request/response | Pub/sub | Queue-based | etc.]
+
+**Authentication**: [OAuth 2.0 | API key | Mutual TLS]
+
+**Error Handling**: [Retry logic, dead letter queue, manual intervention]
+
+**SLA**: [Latency, throughput, availability requirements]
+
+**Owner**: [Team/person responsible for external system]
+
+**Priority**: [CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
+
+---
+
+#### INT-002: Integration with [Another System]
+
+[Repeat structure for each external integration]
+
+---
+
+## Data Requirements
+
+### Data Entities
+
+#### Entity 1: [Entity Name]
+
+**Description**: [What this entity represents]
+
+**Attributes**:
+| Attribute | Type | Required | Description | Constraints |
+|-----------|------|----------|-------------|-------------|
+| id | UUID | Yes | Unique identifier | Primary key |
+| name | String(255) | Yes | Entity name | Not null, unique |
+| created_at | Timestamp | Yes | Creation timestamp | Indexed |
+| updated_at | Timestamp | Yes | Last update timestamp | Indexed |
+| status | Enum | Yes | Entity status | ['active', 'inactive', 'archived'] |
+
+**Relationships**:
+
+- One-to-many with [Entity 2] via [foreign key]
+- Many-to-many with [Entity 3] via [junction table]
+
+**Data Volume**: [Estimated record count at Year 1, Year 3]
+
+**Access Patterns**: [How data is typically queried - for indexing strategy]
+
+**Data Classification**: [PUBLIC | INTERNAL | CONFIDENTIAL | RESTRICTED]
+
+**Data Retention**: [Retention period before archival/deletion]
+
+---
+
+#### Entity 2: [Another Entity]
+
+[Repeat for each major data entity]
+
+---
+
+### Data Quality Requirements
+
+**Data Accuracy**: [Acceptable error rate, validation rules]
+
+**Data Completeness**: [Required fields, null handling strategy]
+
+**Data Consistency**: [Cross-system reconciliation requirements]
+
+**Data Timeliness**: [Freshness requirements, acceptable staleness]
+
+**Data Lineage**: [Tracking data source-to-target transformations]
+
+---
+
+### Data Migration Requirements
+
+**Migration Scope**: [What data needs to be migrated from legacy systems]
+
+**Migration Strategy**: [Big bang | Phased | Parallel run]
+
+**Data Transformation**: [Required transformations during migration]
+
+**Data Validation**: [How to verify migration success]
+
+**Rollback Plan**: [How to revert if migration fails]
+
+**Migration Timeline**: [Estimated duration, blackout windows]
+
+---
+
+## Constraints and Assumptions
+
+### Technical Constraints
+
+**TC-1**: [Constraint description - e.g., Must integrate with existing authentication system]
+
+**TC-2**: [Constraint description - e.g., Must deploy to existing AWS account]
+
+**TC-3**: [Constraint description - e.g., Must use approved technology stack]
+
+---
+
+### Business Constraints
+
+**BC-1**: [Constraint description - e.g., Go-live date cannot slip due to regulatory deadline]
+
+**BC-2**: [Constraint description - e.g., Budget cap of $X]
+
+**BC-3**: [Constraint description - e.g., Must use existing vendor for hosting]
+
+---
+
+### Assumptions
+
+**A-1**: [Assumption - e.g., Users will have modern browsers with JavaScript enabled]
+
+**A-2**: [Assumption - e.g., External API will maintain backward compatibility]
+
+**A-3**: [Assumption - e.g., Network latency to external system < 50ms]
+
+**Validation Plan**: [How assumptions will be validated during project]
+
+---
+
+## Success Criteria and KPIs
+
+### Business Success Metrics
+
+| Metric | Baseline | Target | Timeline | Measurement Method |
+|--------|----------|--------|----------|-------------------|
+| [Metric 1] | [Current value] | [Target value] | [When] | [How measured] |
+| [Metric 2] | [Current value] | [Target value] | [When] | [How measured] |
+| [Metric 3] | [Current value] | [Target value] | [When] | [How measured] |
+
+**Examples**:
+
+- Revenue impact: Increase sales by 15% within 6 months
+- Cost reduction: Reduce operational costs by $500K annually
+- Customer satisfaction: Improve NPS from 45 to 65 within 1 year
+- Process efficiency: Reduce task completion time from 10 minutes to 3 minutes
+
+---
+
+### Technical Success Metrics
+
+| Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
+|--------|--------|-------------------|
+| System availability | 99.9% | Uptime monitoring |
+| API response time (p95) | < 200ms | APM tooling |
+| Error rate | < 0.1% | Log aggregation |
+| Deployment frequency | Daily | CI/CD metrics |
+| Mean time to recovery (MTTR) | < 15 minutes | Incident tracking |
+
+---
+
+### User Adoption Metrics
+
+| Metric | Target | Timeline | Measurement Method |
+|--------|--------|----------|-------------------|
+| Active users | [X users] | [3 months post-launch] | Analytics platform |
+| Feature adoption rate | [Y%] | [6 months post-launch] | Usage analytics |
+| User satisfaction score | [Z/10] | [Ongoing] | User surveys |
+
+---
+
+## Dependencies and Risks
+
+### Dependencies
+
+| Dependency | Description | Owner | Target Date | Status | Impact if Delayed |
+|------------|-------------|-------|-------------|--------|-------------------|
+| [Dependency 1] | [Description] | [Team/Person] | [Date] | [On Track | At Risk | Blocked] | [HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW] |
+| [Dependency 2] | [Description] | [Team/Person] | [Date] | [On Track | At Risk | Blocked] | [HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW] |
+
+---
+
+### Risks
+
+| Risk ID | Description | Probability | Impact | Mitigation Strategy | Owner |
+|---------|-------------|-------------|--------|---------------------|-------|
+| R-1 | [Risk description] | [HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW] | [HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW] | [Mitigation actions] | [Owner] |
+| R-2 | [Risk description] | [HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW] | [HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW] | [Mitigation actions] | [Owner] |
+
+**Risk Scoring**: Probability × Impact = Risk Level
+
+- High Risk (Red): Requires executive escalation
+- Medium Risk (Yellow): Active monitoring and mitigation
+- Low Risk (Green): Accepted
+
+---
+
+## Requirement Conflicts & Resolutions
+
+> **Purpose**: Document conflicting requirements that arise from competing stakeholder drivers and show how conflicts were resolved.
+>
+> **Source**: Conflicts often originate from stakeholder analysis (see `ARC-{PROJECT_ID}-STKE-v*.md` conflict analysis section).
+>
+> **Principle**: Be transparent about trade-offs - don't hide conflicts or pretend both requirements can be fully satisfied.
+
+### Conflict C-1: [Conflict Name]
+
+**Conflicting Requirements**:
+
+- **Requirement A**: [Requirement ID and description] (e.g., FR-001: Launch MVP in 3 months)
+- **Requirement B**: [Requirement ID and description] (e.g., NFR-Q-001: 95% test coverage before launch)
+
+**Stakeholders Involved**:
+
+- **Stakeholder A** (e.g., CEO): Wants Requirement A because [driver/goal] (e.g., competitive pressure, Q2 revenue target)
+- **Stakeholder B** (e.g., CTO): Wants Requirement B because [driver/goal] (e.g., quality reputation, reduce production bugs)
+
+**Nature of Conflict**:
+
+- [Explain why both cannot be fully satisfied]
+- Example: "3-month timeline insufficient to achieve 95% coverage and build all planned features"
+
+**Trade-off Analysis**:
+
+| Option | Pros | Cons | Impact |
+|--------|------|------|--------|
+| **Option 1**: Prioritize Speed (Launch in 3 months with 70% coverage) | ✅ Meet market window<br>✅ Early revenue | ❌ Higher bug risk<br>❌ Technical debt | CEO happy<br>CTO concerned |
+| **Option 2**: Prioritize Quality (6 month launch with 95% coverage) | ✅ Quality reputation<br>✅ Lower production bugs | ❌ Miss market window<br>❌ Delayed revenue | CTO happy<br>CEO frustrated |
+| **Option 3**: Compromise (4 months, 85% coverage, reduced scope) | ✅ Balance speed/quality<br>✅ Partial satisfaction | ❌ Neither fully satisfied<br>❌ Feature cuts needed | Both somewhat satisfied |
+| **Option 4**: Innovate (3 months, automated testing, pair programming) | ✅ Speed AND quality<br>✅ Both satisfied | ❌ Higher upfront cost<br>❌ Team training needed | Both satisfied if works |
+
+**Resolution Strategy**: [PRIORITIZE | COMPROMISE | PHASE | INNOVATE]
+
+**Decision**: [What was chosen]
+
+- Example: "Option 3 - Compromise: 4-month launch with 85% test coverage and reduced MVP scope"
+
+**Rationale**: [Why this decision was made]
+
+- Example: "Board approved 1-month timeline extension. CEO accepted delay for quality. CTO accepted 85% coverage threshold with commitment to reach 95% post-launch."
+
+**Decision Authority**: [Who made the final decision]
+
+- Reference stakeholder analysis RACI matrix
+- Example: "Executive Sponsor (CEO) with input from Steering Committee"
+
+**Impact on Requirements**:
+
+- **Modified**: FR-001 changed from "3 months" to "4 months"
+- **Modified**: NFR-Q-001 changed from "95% coverage" to "85% coverage at launch, 95% within 3 months post-launch"
+- **Removed**: FR-015, FR-022, FR-031 (deferred to Phase 2)
+
+**Stakeholder Management**:
+
+- **CEO (Lost timeline)**: Communicated market analysis showing 4-month launch still captures 80% of opportunity. Committed to weekly progress updates.
+- **CTO (Lost full coverage)**: Committed to post-launch quality sprint. Added NFR-Q-002: "Reach 95% coverage within 3 months of launch"
+
+**Future Consideration**:
+
+- Re-evaluate coverage target after 3 months of production data
+- Deferred features (FR-015, FR-022, FR-031) prioritized for Phase 2
+
+---
+
+### Conflict C-2: [Another Conflict]
+
+[Repeat structure for each conflict]
+
+**Common Conflict Patterns**:
+
+1. **Speed vs Quality**: Fast delivery vs thorough testing/documentation
+   - Resolution strategies: MVP/phased, automated testing, pair programming
+
+2. **Cost vs Features**: Budget constraints vs feature richness
+   - Resolution strategies: prioritize must-haves, defer nice-to-haves, open-source alternatives
+
+3. **Security vs Usability**: Strong security vs seamless user experience
+   - Resolution strategies: risk-based controls, adaptive authentication, user segmentation
+
+4. **Flexibility vs Standardization**: Custom solutions vs standard platforms
+   - Resolution strategies: configurable platforms, plugin architecture, standard + exceptions process
+
+5. **Innovation vs Stability**: New technology vs proven technology
+   - Resolution strategies: pilot projects, hybrid approach, gradual migration
+
+6. **Global vs Local**: Centralized control vs regional autonomy
+   - Resolution strategies: federated model, global policies + local implementation, regional opt-ins
+
+---
+
+## Timeline and Milestones
+
+### High-Level Milestones
+
+| Milestone | Description | Target Date | Dependencies |
+|-----------|-------------|-------------|--------------|
+| Requirements Approval | Stakeholder sign-off on requirements | [DATE] | This document |
+| Design Complete | HLD and DLD approved | [DATE] | Requirements |
+| Development Complete | Code complete, tests passing | [DATE] | Design |
+| UAT Complete | User acceptance testing passed | [DATE] | Development |
+| Production Launch | Go-live | [DATE] | UAT |
+
+---
+
+## Budget
+
+### Cost Estimate
+
+| Category | Estimated Cost | Notes |
+|----------|----------------|-------|
+| Development | $[X] | [FTE count, duration] |
+| Infrastructure | $[X] | [Cloud resources, licenses] |
+| Third-party services | $[X] | [APIs, SaaS subscriptions] |
+| Testing | $[X] | [Performance testing tools, security testing] |
+| Training | $[X] | [User training, documentation] |
+| **Total** | **$[TOTAL]** | |
+
+### Ongoing Operational Costs
+
+| Category | Annual Cost | Notes |
+|----------|-------------|-------|
+| Infrastructure | $[X/year] | [Cloud hosting, scaling] |
+| Licenses | $[X/year] | [Software licenses, SaaS] |
+| Support | $[X/year] | [Maintenance, on-call] |
+| **Total** | **$[TOTAL/year]** | |
+
+---
+
+## Approval
+
+### Requirements Review
+
+| Reviewer | Role | Status | Date | Comments |
+|----------|------|--------|------|----------|
+| [Name] | Business Sponsor | [ ] Approved | [DATE] | |
+| [Name] | Product Owner | [ ] Approved | [DATE] | |
+| [Name] | Enterprise Architect | [ ] Approved | [DATE] | |
+| [Name] | Security | [ ] Approved | [DATE] | |
+| [Name] | Compliance | [ ] Approved | [DATE] | |
+
+### Sign-Off
+
+By signing below, stakeholders confirm that requirements are complete, understood, and approved to proceed to design phase.
+
+| Stakeholder | Signature | Date |
+|-------------|-----------|------|
+| [Name, Role] | _________ | [DATE] |
+| [Name, Role] | _________ | [DATE] |
+
+---
+
+## Appendices
+
+### Appendix A: Glossary
+
+[Define domain-specific terms, acronyms, and abbreviations]
+
+### Appendix B: Reference Documents
+
+- [Link to architecture principles]
+- [Link to related projects]
+- [Link to existing system documentation]
+
+### Appendix C: Wireframes and Mockups
+
+[Link to design artifacts if applicable]
+
+### Appendix D: Data Models
+
+[Detailed ERD or UML diagrams if complex]
+
+---
+
+**Document History**
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|
+| 0.1 | [DATE] | [AUTHOR] | Initial draft |
+| 0.2 | [DATE] | [AUTHOR] | [Stakeholder feedback incorporated] |
+| 1.0 | [DATE] | [AUTHOR] | Approved version |
+
+## External References
+
+> This section provides traceability from generated content back to source documents.
+> Follow citation instructions in the project's citation reference guide.
+
+### Document Register
+
+| Doc ID | Filename | Type | Source Location | Description |
+|--------|----------|------|-----------------|-------------|
+| *None provided* | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Citations
+
+| Citation ID | Doc ID | Page/Section | Category | Quoted Passage |
+|-------------|--------|--------------|----------|----------------|
+| — | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Unreferenced Documents
+
+| Filename | Source Location | Reason |
+|----------|-----------------|--------|
+| — | — | — |
+
+---
+
+**Generated by**: ArcKit `/arckit:requirements` command
+**Generated on**: [DATE]
+**ArcKit Version**: [VERSION]
+**Project**: [PROJECT_NAME]
+**Model**: [AI_MODEL]