arckit-cli 6.1.1__py3-none-any.whl

arckit_cli-6.1.1.data/data/share/arckit/.arckit/templates/project-plan-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,421 @@
+# Project Plan: [PROJECT_NAME]
+
+> **Template Origin**: Official | **ArcKit Version**: [VERSION] | **Command**: `/arckit:plan`
+
+## Document Control
+
+<!-- DOC-CONTROL-HEADER -->
+<!-- Resolved at command-execution time to _partials/document-control-uk.md or _partials/document-control-uae.md based on plugin userConfig classification_scheme + governance_framework. See _partials/RENDERING.md (when present). -->
+
+## Revision History
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approved By | Approval Date |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|-------------|---------------|
+| [VERSION] | [DATE] | ArcKit AI | Initial creation from `/arckit:plan` command | PENDING | PENDING |
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+**Project**: [PROJECT_NAME]
+**Duration**: [X weeks/months]
+**Budget**: £[amount]
+**Team**: [X FTE average]
+**Delivery Model**: GDS Agile Delivery (Discovery → Alpha → Beta → Live)
+
+**Objective**: [One-sentence goal from business case]
+
+**Success Criteria**:
+
+- [Criterion 1 from NFRs or business case]
+- [Criterion 2]
+- [Criterion 3]
+
+**Key Milestones**:
+
+- Discovery Complete: Week [X]
+- Alpha Complete (HLD approved): Week [Y]
+- Beta Complete (Go-Live approved): Week [Z]
+- Production Launch: Week [Z+1]
+
+---
+
+## Timeline Overview (Gantt Chart)
+
+```mermaid
+gantt
+    title [PROJECT_NAME] - Project Timeline
+    dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
+
+    section Discovery
+    Stakeholder Analysis          :a1, [START_DATE], 2w
+    User Research                 :a2, after a1, 2w
+    Business Requirements         :a3, after a2, 2w
+    Architecture Principles       :a4, after a3, 1w
+    Initial Business Case         :a5, after a4, 1w
+    Discovery Assessment          :milestone, m1, after a5, 0d
+
+    section Alpha
+    Detailed Requirements         :b1, after m1, 3w
+    Architecture Design (HLD)     :b2, after b1, 4w
+    Vendor Procurement (SOW)      :b3, after b1, 2w
+    Vendor Evaluation             :b4, after b3, 3w
+    Vendor Selection              :milestone, m2, after b4, 0d
+    HLD Review Preparation        :b5, after b2, 1w
+    HLD Review & Approval         :milestone, m3, after b5, 0d
+    Security Threat Model         :b6, after b2, 2w
+    Updated Business Case         :b7, after b4, 1w
+    Alpha Assessment              :milestone, m4, after b7, 0d
+
+    section Beta
+    Detailed Design (DLD)         :c1, after m4, 4w
+    DLD Review & Approval         :milestone, m5, after c1, 0d
+    Sprint 1 - Core Services      :c2, after m5, 3w
+    Sprint 2 - Integrations       :c3, after c2, 3w
+    Sprint 3 - UI & Reporting     :c4, after c3, 3w
+    Sprint 4 - Testing & Hardening:c5, after c4, 3w
+    Security Testing (SAST/DAST)  :c6, after c5, 2w
+    Performance Testing           :c7, after c6, 2w
+    User Acceptance Testing (UAT) :c8, after c7, 2w
+    Operational Readiness         :c9, after c8, 1w
+    Beta Assessment (Go/No-Go)    :milestone, m6, after c9, 0d
+
+    section Live
+    Production Deployment         :d1, after m6, 1w
+    Hypercare                     :d2, after d1, 4w
+    Benefits Realization Tracking :d3, after d2, 8w
+```
+
+---
+
+## Workflow & Gates Diagram
+
+```mermaid
+graph TB
+    Start[Project Initiation] --> Discovery
+
+    Discovery[Discovery Phase<br/>• Stakeholders<br/>• BRs<br/>• Principles<br/>• Business Case] --> DiscGate{Discovery<br/>Assessment}
+
+    DiscGate -->|✅ Approved| Alpha
+    DiscGate -->|❌ Rejected| Stop1[Stop/Pivot]
+
+    Alpha[Alpha Phase<br/>• Detailed Requirements<br/>• HLD<br/>• Vendor Procurement<br/>• Threat Model] --> HLDGate{HLD Review}
+
+    HLDGate -->|✅ Approved| AlphaGate{Alpha<br/>Assessment}
+    HLDGate -->|❌ Rejected| RefineHLD[Refine HLD]
+    RefineHLD --> HLDGate
+
+    AlphaGate -->|✅ Approved| Beta
+    AlphaGate -->|❌ Rejected| RefineAlpha[Refine Approach]
+    RefineAlpha --> Alpha
+
+    Beta[Beta Phase<br/>• DLD<br/>• Implementation<br/>• Testing<br/>• UAT] --> DLDGate{DLD Review}
+
+    DLDGate -->|✅ Approved| Build[Implementation<br/>Sprints 1-4]
+    DLDGate -->|❌ Rejected| RefineDLD[Refine DLD]
+    RefineDLD --> DLDGate
+
+    Build --> Testing[Security &<br/>Performance<br/>Testing]
+    Testing --> UAT{UAT Pass?}
+    UAT -->|✅ Pass| BetaGate{Beta Assessment<br/>Go/No-Go}
+    UAT -->|❌ Fail| FixIssues[Fix Issues]
+    FixIssues --> UAT
+
+    BetaGate -->|✅ Go-Live| Live[Production<br/>Deployment]
+    BetaGate -->|❌ No-Go| FixBlockers[Address<br/>Blockers]
+    FixBlockers --> Beta
+
+    Live --> Hypercare[Hypercare<br/>4 weeks]
+    Hypercare --> BAU[Business As Usual<br/>Support]
+
+    style DiscGate fill:#FFE4B5
+    style HLDGate fill:#FFE4B5
+    style AlphaGate fill:#FFE4B5
+    style DLDGate fill:#FFE4B5
+    style BetaGate fill:#FFE4B5
+    style Stop1 fill:#FFB6C1
+```
+
+---
+
+## Discovery Phase (Weeks 1-[X])
+
+**Objective**: Validate problem and approach
+
+### Activities & Timeline
+
+| Week | Activity | ArcKit Command | Deliverable |
+|------|----------|----------------|-------------|
+| 1-2 | Stakeholder Analysis | `/arckit:stakeholders` | Stakeholder map, drivers, goals |
+| 3-4 | User Research | Manual | User needs, pain points |
+| 5-6 | Business Requirements | `/arckit:requirements` | BRs with acceptance criteria |
+| 7 | Architecture Principles | `/arckit:principles` | 10-15 principles |
+| 8 | Initial Business Case | `/arckit:sobc` | Cost/benefit analysis |
+| 8 | Initial Risk Register | `/arckit:risk` | Top 10 risks |
+
+### Gate: Discovery Assessment (Week [X])
+
+**Approval Criteria**:
+
+- [ ] Problem clearly defined and validated
+- [ ] User needs documented
+- [ ] Business Requirements defined (15-25 BRs)
+- [ ] Architecture principles agreed
+- [ ] Business case shows positive ROI
+- [ ] No critical risks without mitigation
+- [ ] Stakeholder buy-in confirmed
+
+**Approvers**: SRO, Architecture Board
+
+**Possible Outcomes**:
+
+- ✅ **Go to Alpha** - Problem validated, approach feasible
+- 🔄 **Pivot** - Adjust approach based on findings
+- ❌ **Stop** - Problem not worth solving or approach not feasible
+
+---
+
+## Alpha Phase (Weeks [X+1]-[Y])
+
+**Objective**: Design the solution and validate approach
+
+### Activities & Timeline
+
+| Week | Activity | ArcKit Command | Deliverable |
+|------|----------|----------------|-------------|
+| [X+1]-[X+3] | Detailed Requirements | `/arckit:requirements` | FR, NFR, INT, DR |
+| [X+3]-[X+5] | Data Model | `/arckit:data-model` | Entity relationships |
+| [X+4]-[X+8] | Architecture Design | `/arckit:diagram` | HLD with C4 diagrams |
+| [X+3]-[X+5] | Generate SOW/RFP | `/arckit:sow` | Vendor procurement docs |
+| [X+5]-[X+8] | Vendor Evaluation | `/arckit:evaluate` | Scoring matrix |
+| [X+8] | Security Threat Model | Manual | STRIDE analysis |
+| [X+9] | HLD Review | `/arckit:hld-review` | HLD approval |
+| [X+10] | Updated Business Case | `/arckit:sobc` | Revised costs |
+
+### Gate: HLD Review (Week [Y-2])
+
+**Approval Criteria**:
+
+- [ ] All MUST requirements addressed in design
+- [ ] Architecture principles compliant
+- [ ] Security architecture defined
+- [ ] Integration approach documented
+- [ ] Performance approach documented
+- [ ] No unmitigated high risks
+
+**Approvers**: Architecture Board, Security Lead
+
+### Gate: Alpha Assessment (Week [Y])
+
+**Approval Criteria**:
+
+- [ ] HLD approved
+- [ ] Vendor selected (if applicable)
+- [ ] Business case updated with accurate costs
+- [ ] Team and budget confirmed for Beta
+- [ ] Technical feasibility demonstrated
+
+**Approvers**: SRO, Architecture Board, Finance
+
+**Possible Outcomes**:
+
+- ✅ **Go to Beta** - Design validated, ready to build
+- 🔄 **Iterate** - Refine design based on feedback
+- ❌ **Stop** - Approach not feasible or business case negative
+
+---
+
+## Beta Phase (Weeks [Y+1]-[Z])
+
+**Objective**: Build, test, and prepare for live
+
+### Activities & Timeline
+
+| Week | Activity | ArcKit Command | Deliverable |
+|------|----------|----------------|-------------|
+| [Y+1]-[Y+4] | Detailed Design (DLD) | Manual | DLD document |
+| [Y+5] | DLD Review | `/arckit:dld-review` | DLD approval |
+| [Y+6]-[Y+8] | Sprint 1 - Core Services | Manual | Working software |
+| [Y+9]-[Y+11] | Sprint 2 - Integrations | Manual | Integrated system |
+| [Y+12]-[Y+14] | Sprint 3 - UI & Reporting | Manual | User interface |
+| [Y+15]-[Y+17] | Sprint 4 - Hardening | Manual | Production-ready code |
+| [Y+18]-[Y+19] | Security Testing | Manual | SAST/DAST results |
+| [Y+20]-[Y+21] | Performance Testing | Manual | Load test results |
+| [Y+22]-[Y+23] | UAT | Manual | User sign-off |
+| [Y+24] | Operational Readiness | `/arckit:operationalize` | Runbooks, DR plan |
+| [Y+24] | Quality Analysis | `/arckit:analyze` | Final quality check |
+
+### Gate: DLD Review (Week [Y+5])
+
+**Approval Criteria**:
+
+- [ ] DLD aligns with approved HLD
+- [ ] All implementation details documented
+- [ ] Security controls specified
+- [ ] Test strategy defined
+- [ ] Deployment approach documented
+
+**Approvers**: Technical Lead, Architecture Board
+
+### Gate: Beta Assessment / Go-Live (Week [Z])
+
+**Approval Criteria**:
+
+- [ ] All MUST requirements implemented and tested
+- [ ] Security testing passed (no critical/high vulnerabilities)
+- [ ] Performance testing passed (meets NFR-P targets)
+- [ ] UAT signed off by business
+- [ ] Operational readiness confirmed
+- [ ] DR/BCP tested
+- [ ] Support team trained
+
+**Approvers**: SRO, Architecture Board, Security Lead, Operations Lead
+
+**Possible Outcomes**:
+
+- ✅ **Go-Live** - Ready for production deployment
+- 🔄 **Fix Issues** - Address blockers before go-live
+- ❌ **No-Go** - Major issues require significant rework
+
+---
+
+## Live Phase (Week [Z+1]+)
+
+**Objective**: Deploy, stabilize, and realize benefits
+
+### Activities & Timeline
+
+| Week | Activity | ArcKit Command | Deliverable |
+|------|----------|----------------|-------------|
+| [Z+1] | Production Deployment | Manual | Live system |
+| [Z+2]-[Z+5] | Hypercare | Manual | Issue resolution |
+| [Z+6]+ | Benefits Tracking | `/arckit:sobc` | Benefits realization |
+| Quarterly | Quality Reviews | `/arckit:analyze` | Ongoing compliance |
+| Quarterly | Risk Updates | `/arckit:risk` | Updated risk register |
+
+---
+
+## ArcKit Commands Integration
+
+### Discovery Phase
+
+- Week 1-2: `/arckit:stakeholders` - Stakeholder analysis
+- Week 5-6: `/arckit:requirements` - Business Requirements (BRs)
+- Week 7: `/arckit:principles` - Architecture principles
+- Week 8: `/arckit:sobc` - Initial business case
+- Week 8: `/arckit:risk` - Initial risk register
+
+### Alpha Phase
+
+- Week 9-11: `/arckit:requirements` - Detailed requirements (FR, NFR, INT, DR)
+- Week 10-12: `/arckit:data-model` - Data model
+- Week 12-15: `/arckit:diagram` - Architecture diagrams (C4)
+- Week 11-12: `/arckit:sow` - Generate SOW/RFP (if vendor needed)
+- Week 13-15: `/arckit:evaluate` - Vendor evaluation (if applicable)
+- Week 18: `/arckit:hld-review` - HLD approval gate
+- Week 19: `/arckit:sobc` - Updated business case
+
+### Beta Phase
+
+- Week 25: `/arckit:dld-review` - DLD approval gate
+- Week 29-31: `/arckit:analyze` - Quality analysis
+- Week 32-33: `/arckit:traceability` - Verify design → code → tests
+- If AI: `/arckit:ai-playbook`, `/arckit:atrs` - AI compliance
+
+### Live Phase
+
+- Quarterly: `/arckit:analyze` - Periodic quality reviews
+- Quarterly: `/arckit:risk` - Update operational risks
+- Annually: `/arckit:sobc` - Track benefits realization
+
+---
+
+## Resource Plan
+
+### Team Sizing by Phase
+
+| Phase | Duration | Team Size | Key Roles |
+|-------|----------|-----------|-----------|
+| Discovery | [X] weeks | [N] FTE | BA, Architect, UX Researcher |
+| Alpha | [Y-X] weeks | [N] FTE | BA, Architect, Tech Lead, Security |
+| Beta | [Z-Y] weeks | [N] FTE | Full dev team, QA, DevOps |
+| Live | Ongoing | [N] FTE | Support, Operations |
+
+### Budget Summary
+
+| Phase | Duration | Team Cost | Infrastructure | Vendor/License | Total |
+|-------|----------|-----------|----------------|----------------|-------|
+| Discovery | [X] weeks | £[X] | £[X] | £[X] | £[X] |
+| Alpha | [Y-X] weeks | £[X] | £[X] | £[X] | £[X] |
+| Beta | [Z-Y] weeks | £[X] | £[X] | £[X] | £[X] |
+| Live (Year 1) | 12 months | £[X] | £[X] | £[X] | £[X] |
+| **Total** | | | | | **£[TOTAL]** |
+
+---
+
+## Risks & Assumptions
+
+### Key Risks
+
+| Risk | Impact | Likelihood | Mitigation |
+|------|--------|------------|------------|
+| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation] |
+| [Risk 2] | Medium | High | [Mitigation] |
+| [Risk 3] | High | Low | [Mitigation] |
+
+### Key Assumptions
+
+- [Assumption 1]
+- [Assumption 2]
+- [Assumption 3]
+
+### Dependencies
+
+- [Dependency 1]
+- [Dependency 2]
+- [Dependency 3]
+
+---
+
+## Appendix A: Glossary
+
+| Term | Definition |
+|------|------------|
+| GDS | Government Digital Service |
+| HLD | High-Level Design |
+| DLD | Detailed-Level Design |
+| UAT | User Acceptance Testing |
+| SRO | Senior Responsible Owner |
+| BA | Business Analyst |
+| NFR | Non-Functional Requirement |
+
+## External References
+
+> This section provides traceability from generated content back to source documents.
+> Follow citation instructions in the project's citation reference guide.
+
+### Document Register
+
+| Doc ID | Filename | Type | Source Location | Description |
+|--------|----------|------|-----------------|-------------|
+| *None provided* | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Citations
+
+| Citation ID | Doc ID | Page/Section | Category | Quoted Passage |
+|-------------|--------|--------------|----------|----------------|
+| — | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Unreferenced Documents
+
+| Filename | Source Location | Reason |
+|----------|-----------------|--------|
+| — | — | — |
+
+---
+
+**Generated by**: ArcKit `/arckit:plan` command
+**Generated on**: [DATE]
+**ArcKit Version**: [VERSION]
+**Project**: [PROJECT_NAME]
+**Model**: [AI_MODEL]

arckit_cli-6.1.1.data/data/share/arckit/.arckit/templates/rationalization-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+---
+title: "Application Rationalisation"
+docType: APPR
+templateVersion: "1.0"
+---
+
+# Application Rationalisation
+
+## Document Control
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| Document ID | `ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-APPR-v[VERSION]` |
+| Document Type | Application Rationalisation |
+| Project | `[PROJECT_NAME]` |
+| Classification | `[CLASSIFICATION]` |
+| Status | DRAFT |
+| Version | `[VERSION]` |
+| Created | `[YYYY-MM-DD]` |
+| Last Modified | `[YYYY-MM-DD]` |
+| Review Cycle | Quarterly during active rationalisation programme |
+| Next Review Date | `[YYYY-MM-DD]` |
+| Owner | `[OWNER_NAME_AND_ROLE]` |
+| Reviewed By | `[REVIEWER_NAME]` |
+| Approved By | `[APPROVER_NAME]` |
+| Distribution | `[DISTRIBUTION_LIST]` |
+
+### Revision History
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Description | Reviewer | Approver |
+|---------|------|--------|-------------|----------|----------|
+| `[VERSION]` | `[YYYY-MM-DD]` | ArcKit AI | Initial creation from `/arckit:application-rationalization` command | `[REVIEWER_NAME]` | `[APPROVER_NAME]` |
+
+---
+
+## 1. Rationalisation Summary
+
+| Decision | Count | Applications |
+|----------|-------|-------------|
+| Keep | [N] | [App-1, App-2, ...] |
+| Merge | [N] | [App-3, App-4 (→ target), ...] |
+| Replace | [N] | [App-5, App-6, ...] |
+| Retire | [N] | [App-7, App-8, ...] |
+
+**Overall Portfolio**: [N] applications assessed → [N] decisions rendered
+**Target reduction**: [X]% fewer applications post-rationalisation
+
+## 2. Per-Application Decisions
+
+### APP-001: [Application Name] — [KEEP / MERGE / REPLACE / RETIRE]
+
+- **Capability**: [Primary capability served]
+- **Strategic Fit**: [Strategic / Critical / Support]
+- **Technical Condition**: [Modern / Aging / Legacy]
+- **Business Value**: [High / Medium / Low]
+- **Current Cost**: [£X/year — license, maintenance, infrastructure, FTE]
+- **Rationale**: [Why this decision — reference principles, strategy, BPCM alignment]
+- **Migration Approach**: [Lift-shift / Replatform / Refactor / Retire / Consolidate]
+- **Target Platform** (if Replace/Merge): [Platform name]
+- **Timeline**: [Q1 2026 / Wave 1, etc.]
+- **Estimated Cost**: [£X]
+- **Risk Level**: [Low / Medium / High]
+- **Dependencies**: [Upstream/downstream applications affected]
+- **Owner**: [Application owner / business sponsor]
+
+### APP-002: [Application Name] — [KEEP / MERGE / REPLACE / RETIRE]
+
+- **Capability**: [Primary capability served]
+- **Strategic Fit**: [Strategic / Critical / Support]
+- **Technical Condition**: [Modern / Aging / Legacy]
+- **Business Value**: [High / Medium / Low]
+- **Current Cost**: [£X/year — license, maintenance, infrastructure, FTE]
+- **Rationale**: [Why this decision]
+- **Migration Approach**: [Lift-shift / Replatform / Refactor / Retire / Consolidate]
+- **Target Platform** (if Replace/Merge): [Platform name]
+- **Timeline**: [Q1 2026 / Wave 1, etc.]
+- **Estimated Cost**: [£X]
+- **Risk Level**: [Low / Medium / High]
+- **Dependencies**: [Upstream/downstream applications affected]
+- **Owner**: [Application owner / business sponsor]
+
+### APP-003: [Application Name] — [KEEP / MERGE / REPLACE / RETIRE]
+
+- **Capability**: [Primary capability served]
+- **Strategic Fit**: [Strategic / Critical / Support]
+- **Technical Condition**: [Modern / Aging / Legacy]
+- **Business Value**: [High / Medium / Low]
+- **Current Cost**: [£X/year — license, maintenance, infrastructure, FTE]
+- **Rationale**: [Why this decision]
+- **Migration Approach**: [Lift-shift / Replatform / Refactor / Retire / Consolidate]
+- **Target Platform** (if Replace/Merge): [Platform name]
+- **Timeline**: [Q1 2026 / Wave 1, etc.]
+- **Estimated Cost**: [£X]
+- **Risk Level**: [Low / Medium / High]
+- **Dependencies**: [Upstream/downstream applications affected]
+- **Owner**: [Application owner / business sponsor]
+
+[Continue for each application in inventory...]
+
+## 3. Portfolio Target State
+
+### Target Distribution
+
+| Decision Category | Count | Percentage |
+|-------------------|-------|------------|
+| Keep | [N] | [X]% |
+| Merge | [N] | [X]% |
+| Replace | [N] | [X]% |
+| Retire | [N] | [X]% |
+| **Total** | **[N]** | **100%** |
+
+```mermaid
+pie title Target Portfolio Distribution
+    "Keep": 40
+    "Merge": 15
+    "Replace": 30
+    "Retire": 15
+```
+
+### Capability Coverage
+
+| Capability | Current Apps | Target Apps | Decision |
+|------------|-------------|------------|----------|
+| [Capability A] | [N] | [N] | [Consolidated] |
+| [Capability B] | [N] | [N] | [Unchanged] |
+| [Capability C] | [N] | [N] | [New replacement needed] |
+
+## 4. Consolidation Benefits
+
+| Benefit Area | Estimated Value | Confidence | Notes |
+|--------------|-----------------|------------|-------|
+| License reduction | £[X]/year | [High/Med/Low] | [Detail] |
+| Maintenance savings | £[X]/year | [High/Med/Low] | [Detail] |
+| Operational efficiency | [X]% reduction | [High/Med/Low] | [Detail] |
+| Infrastructure consolidation | £[X]/year | [High/Med/Low] | [Detail] |
+| Security posture improvement | [Qualitative] | [High/Med/Low] | [Detail] |
+| **Total estimated annual benefit** | **£[X]/year** | — | — |
+
+**Return on Investment**: [X] months to realise savings vs. total rationalisation investment of £[X]
+
+## 5. Risk Register
+
+| # | Risk | Affected App(s) | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
+|---|------|-----------------|-----------|--------|------------|
+| 1 | [Business disruption during migration] | [APP-XXX] | [Low/Med/High] | [Low/Med/High] | [Mitigation plan] |
+| 2 | [Data loss during consolidation] | [APP-XXX] | [Low/Med/High] | [Low/Med/High] | [Mitigation plan] |
+| 3 | [Integration dependency breakdown] | [APP-XXX] | [Low/Med/High] | [Low/Med/High] | [Mitigation plan] |
+| 4 | [Vendor non-cooperation on contract termination] | [APP-XXX] | [Low/Med/High] | [Low/Med/High] | [Mitigation plan] |
+| 5 | [Staff skills gap for new platform] | [APP-XXX] | [Low/Med/High] | [Low/Med/High] | [Mitigation plan] |
+
+## 6. Implementation Sequencing
+
+```mermaid
+gantt
+    title Rationalisation Implementation Plan
+    dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
+    section Wave 1 — Quick Wins
+    Retire legacy apps     :done, wave1a, 2026-04-01, 90d
+    Merge duplicates       :active, wave1b, 2026-04-01, 120d
+    section Wave 2 — Foundation
+    Platform preparation   :wave2a, 2026-07-01, 90d
+    Data migration planning :wave2b, 2026-07-01, 60d
+    section Wave 3 — Transformation
+    Replace strategic apps :wave3a, 2026-10-01, 180d
+    Integrate replacements  :wave3b, 2026-10-01, 120d
+    section Wave 4 — Optimisation
+    Final rationalisation  :wave4a, 2027-04-01, 90d
+    Performance tuning     :wave4b, 2027-04-01, 60d
+```
+
+### Wave Details
+
+| Wave | Focus | Duration | Apps | Key Milestone |
+|------|-------|----------|------|---------------|
+| 1 — Quick Wins | Low-risk retirements and clear merges | [N] months | [N] apps | [Milestone] |
+| 2 — Foundation | Platform readiness and data prep | [N] months | [N] apps | [Milestone] |
+| 3 — Transformation | Major replacements and migrations | [N] months | [N] apps | [Milestone] |
+| 4 — Optimisation | Final rationalisation and tuning | [N] months | [N] apps | [Milestone] |
+
+## 7. Traceability
+
+| Source Artifact | Document | Link/Reference |
+|-----------------|----------|----------------|
+| Application Portfolio | `ARC-[P]-APP-v[N].md` | [Direct reference] |
+| Business Capability Model | `ARC-[P]-BPCM-v[N].md` | [Capability alignment] |
+| Architecture Principles | `ARC-000-PRIN-v[N].md` | [Principle references] |
+| Architecture Decisions | `ARC-[P]-ADR-*.md` | [Decision references] |
+
+## 8. Assumptions
+
+1. [Application inventory is complete and up to date]
+2. [Business sponsors will approve decisions within 30 days]
+3. [Budget envelope of £[X] available for rationalisation programme]
+
+## 9. Decisions Pending Approval
+
+| Decision | App | Status | Required By |
+|----------|-----|--------|------------|
+| [Pending decision] | [APP-XXX] | Awaiting sponsor approval | [YYYY-MM-DD] |
+
+---
+
+**Generated by**: ArcKit `/arckit:application-rationalization` command
+**Generated on**: `[DATE] [TIME] GMT`
+**ArcKit Version**: `{ARCKIT_VERSION}`
+**Project**: `[PROJECT_NAME]` (Project `[PROJECT_ID]`)
+**AI Model**: `[MODEL_NAME]`
+**Generation Context**: [Brief note about source documents used]