arckit-cli 6.1.1__py3-none-any.whl

arckit_cli-6.1.1.data/data/share/arckit/.arckit/templates/vendor-scoring-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+# Vendor Scoring Summary: [PROJECT_NAME]
+
+> **Template Origin**: Official | **ArcKit Version**: [VERSION] | **Command**: `/arckit:evaluate`
+
+## Document Control
+
+<!-- DOC-CONTROL-HEADER -->
+<!-- Resolved at command-execution time to _partials/document-control-uk.md or _partials/document-control-uae.md based on plugin userConfig classification_scheme + governance_framework. See _partials/RENDERING.md (when present). -->
+
+## Revision History
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approved By | Approval Date |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|-------------|---------------|
+| [VERSION] | [DATE] | ArcKit AI | Initial creation from `/arckit:evaluate` command | PENDING | PENDING |
+
+---
+
+## 1. Vendor Scoring Overview
+
+### 1.1 Vendors Evaluated
+
+| Vendor | Status | Technical Score | Cost Score | Final Score | Rank |
+|--------|--------|-----------------|------------|-------------|------|
+| [Vendor A] | Qualified | [X/100] | [Y/100] | [Z/100] | 1 |
+| [Vendor B] | Qualified | [X/100] | [Y/100] | [Z/100] | 2 |
+| [Vendor C] | Disqualified | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
+
+**Scoring Formula**: Final Score = (Technical × 70%) + (Cost × 30%)
+
+---
+
+## 2. Vendor A: [VENDOR_NAME]
+
+### 2.1 Technical Scoring
+
+| Category | Max Points | Score | % | Comments |
+|----------|------------|-------|---|----------|
+| Technical Approach & Solution Design | 35 | [X] | [Y%] | [Summary] |
+| Project Approach & Methodology | 20 | [X] | [Y%] | [Summary] |
+| Team Qualifications & Experience | 25 | [X] | [Y%] | [Summary] |
+| Relevant Experience & References | 15 | [X] | [Y%] | [Summary] |
+| Understanding of Requirements | 5 | [X] | [Y%] | [Summary] |
+| **TOTAL TECHNICAL SCORE** | **100** | **[X]** | **[Y%]** | |
+
+**Technical Strengths**:
+
+- [Strength 1]
+- [Strength 2]
+- [Strength 3]
+
+**Technical Weaknesses**:
+
+- [Weakness 1]
+- [Weakness 2]
+
+---
+
+### 2.2 Cost Scoring
+
+**Total Proposed Cost**: $[X]
+
+**Cost Breakdown**:
+| Category | Amount | % of Total |
+|----------|--------|------------|
+| Labor | $[X] | [Y%] |
+| Infrastructure | $[X] | [Y%] |
+| Licenses/Tools | $[X] | [Y%] |
+| Other | $[X] | [Y%] |
+| **Total** | **$[X]** | **100%** |
+
+**Cost Score**: [Y/100] (using formula: Lowest Cost / This Cost × 100)
+
+**Cost Assessment**: [Within budget | At budget limit | Over budget]
+
+---
+
+### 2.3 Combined Score
+
+| Metric | Score | Weight | Weighted Score |
+|--------|-------|--------|----------------|
+| Technical | [X/100] | 70% | [Y] |
+| Cost | [X/100] | 30% | [Y] |
+| **FINAL SCORE** | | | **[Z/100]** |
+
+---
+
+### 2.4 Reference Checks
+
+| Reference | Project Similarity | Feedback | Overall |
+|-----------|-------------------|----------|---------|
+| [Client 1] | High | Positive - delivered on time, good quality | ✅ Positive |
+| [Client 2] | Medium | Very positive - exceeded expectations | ✅ Positive |
+| [Client 3] | High | Positive - minor delays but good outcome | ✅ Positive |
+
+**Reference Check Summary**: [All positive | Mostly positive | Mixed | Negative]
+
+---
+
+### 2.5 Presentation Assessment
+
+**Presentation Date**: [DATE]
+
+**Strengths Demonstrated**:
+
+- [Strength from presentation]
+- [Strength from presentation]
+
+**Concerns Raised**:
+
+- [Concern from Q&A]
+
+**Team Chemistry**: [Excellent | Good | Adequate | Poor]
+
+---
+
+### 2.6 Overall Assessment
+
+**Recommendation**: [SELECT | SHORTLIST | REJECT]
+
+**Rationale**: [2-3 sentences explaining recommendation]
+
+**Risks**:
+
+- [Risk 1 and mitigation]
+- [Risk 2 and mitigation]
+
+---
+
+## 3. Vendor B: [VENDOR_NAME]
+
+[Repeat structure from Vendor A]
+
+---
+
+## 4. Vendor C: [VENDOR_NAME]
+
+### 4.1 Disqualification Reason
+
+**Disqualified**: [Yes | No]
+
+**Reason**: [Failed mandatory qualification | Proposal non-compliant | Other]
+
+**Details**: [Specific reason for disqualification]
+
+---
+
+## 5. Comparative Analysis
+
+### 5.1 Side-by-Side Technical Comparison
+
+| Criterion | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Winner |
+|-----------|----------|----------|----------|--------|
+| **Architecture Quality** | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Vendor] |
+| **Security Approach** | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Vendor] |
+| **Team Expertise** | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Vendor] |
+| **Relevant Experience** | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Vendor] |
+| **Innovation** | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Vendor] |
+
+---
+
+### 5.2 Cost Comparison
+
+| Vendor | Total Cost | Cost per Point (Technical) | Value Ranking |
+|--------|------------|---------------------------|---------------|
+| Vendor A | $[X] | $[Y] | [1st | 2nd | 3rd] |
+| Vendor B | $[X] | $[Y] | [1st | 2nd | 3rd] |
+| Vendor C | $[X] | $[Y] | [1st | 2nd | 3rd] |
+
+**Best Value**: [Vendor with best cost/quality ratio]
+
+---
+
+### 5.3 Risk Comparison
+
+| Risk Factor | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C |
+|-------------|----------|----------|----------|
+| **Delivery Risk** | [Low | Med | High] | [Low | Med | High] | [Low | Med | High] |
+| **Technology Risk** | [Low | Med | High] | [Low | Med | High] | [Low | Med | High] |
+| **Team Risk** | [Low | Med | High] | [Low | Med | High] | [Low | Med | High] |
+| **Financial Risk** | [Low | Med | High] | [Low | Med | High] | [Low | Med | High] |
+
+**Lowest Risk Vendor**: [Vendor Name]
+
+---
+
+## 6. Selection Recommendation
+
+### 6.1 Recommended Vendor
+
+**Selected Vendor**: [VENDOR_NAME]
+
+**Final Score**: [X/100]
+
+**Selection Rationale**:
+[2-3 paragraphs explaining why this vendor was selected, addressing:
+
+- How they scored technically and on cost
+- Key differentiators that tipped the decision
+- Confidence in their ability to deliver
+- Cultural fit and partnership potential]
+
+---
+
+### 6.2 Key Strengths of Selected Vendor
+
+1. **[Strength 1]**: [Description]
+2. **[Strength 2]**: [Description]
+3. **[Strength 3]**: [Description]
+
+---
+
+### 6.3 Risks and Mitigations
+
+| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation Strategy |
+|------|------------|--------|---------------------|
+| [Risk 1] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Mitigation] |
+| [Risk 2] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Mitigation] |
+
+---
+
+### 6.4 Alternatives Considered
+
+**Second Choice**: [Vendor Name] ([Score/100])
+
+- **Why considered**: [Strengths]
+- **Why not selected**: [Weaknesses or reasons selected vendor was better]
+
+---
+
+## 7. Next Steps
+
+### 7.1 Contract Negotiation
+
+**Target Start Date**: [DATE]
+
+**Key Negotiation Points**:
+
+- [ ] Final pricing and payment terms
+- [ ] Key personnel commitments
+- [ ] Intellectual property rights
+- [ ] Liability and indemnification
+- [ ] Change management process
+- [ ] Warranty and support terms
+
+---
+
+### 7.2 Vendor Notification
+
+**Award Notification**: [DATE]
+
+**Non-Selected Vendor Notification**: [DATE]
+
+**Debrief Offers**: [ ] Yes [ ] No
+
+---
+
+## 8. Approvals
+
+### 8.1 Selection Approval
+
+| Approver | Role | Decision | Signature | Date |
+|----------|------|----------|-----------|------|
+| [Name] | Evaluation Lead | [ ] Approve [ ] Reject | _________ | [DATE] |
+| [Name] | Enterprise Architect | [ ] Approve [ ] Reject | _________ | [DATE] |
+| [Name] | Executive Sponsor | [ ] Approve [ ] Reject | _________ | [DATE] |
+| [Name] | CTO/CIO | [ ] Approve [ ] Reject | _________ | [DATE] |
+| [Name] | Procurement | [ ] Approve [ ] Reject | _________ | [DATE] |
+
+**Approval Status**: [APPROVED | PENDING | REJECTED]
+
+**Approval Date**: [DATE]
+
+---
+
+## Appendices
+
+### Appendix A: Detailed Scoring Sheets
+
+[Link to or attach individual evaluator scorecards]
+
+### Appendix B: Vendor Proposals
+
+[Links to vendor proposal documents]
+
+### Appendix C: Reference Check Notes
+
+[Detailed notes from reference calls]
+
+### Appendix D: Presentation Notes
+
+[Notes from vendor presentation sessions]
+
+---
+
+**Document Control**
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|
+| 1.0 | [DATE] | [AUTHOR] | Initial scoring summary |
+| 1.1 | [DATE] | [AUTHOR] | Updated after vendor presentations |
+| 2.0 | [DATE] | [AUTHOR] | Final selection recommendation |
+
+## External References
+
+> This section provides traceability from generated content back to source documents.
+> Follow citation instructions in the project's citation reference guide.
+
+### Document Register
+
+| Doc ID | Filename | Type | Source Location | Description |
+|--------|----------|------|-----------------|-------------|
+| *None provided* | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Citations
+
+| Citation ID | Doc ID | Page/Section | Category | Quoted Passage |
+|-------------|--------|--------------|----------|----------------|
+| — | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Unreferenced Documents
+
+| Filename | Source Location | Reason |
+|----------|-----------------|--------|
+| — | — | — |
+
+---
+
+**Generated by**: ArcKit `/arckit:evaluate` command
+**Generated on**: [DATE]
+**ArcKit Version**: [VERSION]
+**Project**: [PROJECT_NAME]
+**Model**: [AI_MODEL]

arckit_cli-6.1.1.data/data/share/arckit/.arckit/templates/wardley-climate-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
+# Wardley Climate Assessment: {context_name}
+
+> **Template Origin**: Official | **ArcKit Version**: [VERSION] | **Command**: `/arckit:wardley.climate`
+
+## Document Control
+
+<!-- DOC-CONTROL-HEADER -->
+<!-- Resolved at command-execution time to _partials/document-control-uk.md or _partials/document-control-uae.md based on plugin userConfig classification_scheme + governance_framework. See _partials/RENDERING.md (when present). -->
+
+## Revision History
+
+| Version | Date | Author | Changes | Approved By | Approval Date |
+|---------|------|--------|---------|-------------|---------------|
+| [VERSION] | [DATE] | ArcKit AI | Initial creation from `/arckit:wardley.climate` command | PENDING | PENDING |
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+[2-4 sentences summarising the most significant climate forces acting on this landscape, the components under most pressure, and the key strategic implications. Include whether the overall climate is favourable, neutral, or threatening for the current strategy.]
+
+**Climate Severity**:
+
+| Category | Severity | Most Affected Components |
+|----------|----------|--------------------------|
+| Component Patterns | High / Medium / Low / None | {Component names} |
+| Financial Patterns | High / Medium / Low / None | {Component names} |
+| Speed Patterns | High / Medium / Low / None | {Component names} |
+| Inertia Patterns | High / Medium / Low / None | {Component names} |
+| Competitor Patterns | High / Medium / Low / None | {Component names} |
+| Prediction Patterns | High / Medium / Low / None | {Component names} |
+
+---
+
+## Map Reference
+
+This climate assessment is derived from the following Wardley Map artifact:
+
+| Field | Value |
+|-------|-------|
+| **WARD Document ID** | ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-WARD-[NNN]-v[VERSION] |
+| **Map Title** | {map_title} |
+| **Map Date** | [YYYY-MM-DD] |
+
+---
+
+## Component Inventory
+
+*Extracted from the referenced Wardley Map. All components subject to climate assessment.*
+
+| Component | Visibility | Evolution | Stage |
+|-----------|-----------|-----------|-------|
+| {Component 1} | {0.xx} | {0.xx} | Genesis / Custom / Product / Commodity |
+| {Component 2} | {0.xx} | {0.xx} | Genesis / Custom / Product / Commodity |
+| {Component 3} | {0.xx} | {0.xx} | Genesis / Custom / Product / Commodity |
+| {Component 4} | {0.xx} | {0.xx} | Genesis / Custom / Product / Commodity |
+| {Component 5} | {0.xx} | {0.xx} | Genesis / Custom / Product / Commodity |
+
+---
+
+## Climate Assessment by Category
+
+### 1. Component Patterns
+
+*How do components naturally evolve and what forces act on them?*
+
+| Pattern | Applies? | Impact | Evidence | Strategic Implication |
+|---------|:--------:|:------:|----------|-----------------------|
+| Everything evolves (no component stays still) | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation from the map or market} | {What this means for strategy} |
+| Characteristics change as components evolve | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| No "one size fits all" method | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Success breeds inertia | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Higher-order systems create new sources of worth | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Components can co-evolve | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Capital flows to new areas of value | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Commoditisation enables new genesis | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+
+---
+
+### 2. Financial Patterns
+
+*How do economic forces shape the landscape?*
+
+| Pattern | Applies? | Impact | Evidence | Strategic Implication |
+|---------|:--------:|:------:|----------|-----------------------|
+| Efficiency enables innovation | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Capital flows to new sources of value | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Commoditisation reduces margin | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| New economic models emerge (e.g., SaaS, platform) | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Price pressure on product-stage components | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Investment bias towards Genesis/Custom stages | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+
+---
+
+### 3. Speed Patterns
+
+*How does the pace of change affect the landscape?*
+
+| Pattern | Applies? | Impact | Evidence | Strategic Implication |
+|---------|:--------:|:------:|----------|-----------------------|
+| Evolution is not uniform (some components evolve faster) | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Commoditisation is accelerating (shorter cycles) | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Ecosystem effects accelerate evolution | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Open source accelerates commoditisation | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Regulation can slow or accelerate evolution | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+
+---
+
+### 4. Inertia Patterns
+
+*What forces resist change in this landscape?*
+
+| Pattern | Applies? | Impact | Evidence | Strategic Implication |
+|---------|:--------:|:------:|----------|-----------------------|
+| Past success creates resistance to change | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Existing practices embed inertia | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Vendor lock-in creates artificial inertia | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+
+---
+
+### 5. Competitor Patterns
+
+*How do competitor behaviours shape the landscape?*
+
+| Pattern | Applies? | Impact | Evidence | Strategic Implication |
+|---------|:--------:|:------:|----------|-----------------------|
+| Competitors also face inertia | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| New entrants exploit incumbent inertia | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+
+---
+
+### 6. Prediction Patterns
+
+*What can be reliably anticipated about how this landscape will change?*
+
+| Pattern | Applies? | Impact | Evidence | Strategic Implication |
+|---------|:--------:|:------:|----------|-----------------------|
+| Commoditisation of custom-built components is predictable | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Co-evolution of practice and technology is predictable | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Higher-order systems will emerge from current commodities | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Shifts from product to utility are visible before they occur | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| New entrants will appear at Genesis stage of key components | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Inertia creates predictable points of disruption | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Ecosystem plays follow commoditisation events | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+| Peace / War / Wonder cycles follow predictable patterns | Yes / No / Partial | H / M / L | {Observation} | {Strategic implication} |
+
+---
+
+## Per-Component Impact Matrix
+
+*How strongly does each climate category affect each component? H = High, M = Medium, L = Low, — = Not applicable.*
+
+| Component | Component Patterns | Financial Patterns | Speed Patterns | Inertia Patterns | Competitor Patterns | Prediction Patterns |
+|-----------|:-----------------:|:-----------------:|:--------------:|:----------------:|:------------------:|:------------------:|
+| {Component 1} | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — |
+| {Component 2} | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — |
+| {Component 3} | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — |
+| {Component 4} | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — |
+| {Component 5} | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — | H / M / L / — |
+
+---
+
+## Prediction Horizons
+
+*Anticipated evolution of key components over the next 6 and 18 months.*
+
+| Component | Current Stage | 6-Month Prediction | 18-Month Prediction | Confidence | Key Signals |
+|-----------|:------------:|:-----------------:|:------------------:|:----------:|-------------|
+| {Component 1} | Genesis | Custom (0.30) | Custom (0.40) | High / Medium / Low | {Observable signals — market activity, open source, vendor releases} |
+| {Component 2} | Custom | Product (0.55) | Product (0.65) | High / Medium / Low | {Observable signals} |
+| {Component 3} | Product | Product (0.70) | Commodity (0.80) | High / Medium / Low | {Observable signals} |
+| {Component 4} | Commodity | Commodity (0.90) | Commodity (0.95) | High / Medium / Low | {Observable signals} |
+
+---
+
+## Wave Analysis
+
+**Peace / War / Wonder Cycle**:
+
+The Wardley climate framework identifies a recurring cycle in markets:
+
+- **Peace**: Steady improvement of existing products; incumbents dominant; gradual evolution
+- **War**: Rapid disruption as a new model (e.g., cloud, SaaS, open source) makes existing approaches obsolete; major market shift
+- **Wonder**: Post-disruption stabilisation; new commodity enables new genesis; ecosystem flourishes
+
+**Current Positioning for This Context**:
+
+| Market Segment | Current Phase | Evidence | Strategic Implication |
+|----------------|:------------:|----------|-----------------------|
+| {Segment 1} | Peace / War / Wonder | {Evidence supporting this classification} | {How to respond to this phase} |
+| {Segment 2} | Peace / War / Wonder | {Evidence supporting this classification} | {How to respond to this phase} |
+
+**Recommended Response to Phase**:
+
+- {If Peace}: {Strategy for steady-state market — consolidation, efficiency, incremental improvement}
+- {If War}: {Strategy for disruption — move fast, exploit inertia of incumbents, align with the new model}
+- {If Wonder}: {Strategy for post-disruption — explore new genesis opportunities enabled by the new commodity}
+
+---
+
+## Inertia Assessment
+
+| Component | Inertia Type | Severity | Mitigation Strategy |
+|-----------|-------------|:--------:|---------------------|
+| {Component 1} | Skills / Process / Vendor / Cultural / Capital / Regulatory | H / M / L | {Specific mitigation plan} |
+| {Component 2} | Skills / Process / Vendor / Cultural / Capital / Regulatory | H / M / L | {Specific mitigation plan} |
+| {Component 3} | Skills / Process / Vendor / Cultural / Capital / Regulatory | H / M / L | {Specific mitigation plan} |
+
+**Inertia Type Definitions**:
+
+- **Skills**: Team expertise locked to legacy technology or practice
+- **Process**: Established workflows and procedures that resist change
+- **Vendor**: Contractual or technical dependencies that create switching costs
+- **Cultural**: "We've always done it this way" — organisational resistance
+- **Capital**: Sunk costs in existing systems justify continued investment
+- **Regulatory**: Compliance requirements that constrain or slow evolution
+
+---
+
+## Strategic Implications
+
+[3-5 bullet points summarising the most actionable strategic implications from the full climate assessment. Each point should connect a specific climate finding to a recommended strategic response.]
+
+- **{Implication 1}**: {Specific climate finding} → {Recommended strategic response}
+- **{Implication 2}**: {Specific climate finding} → {Recommended strategic response}
+- **{Implication 3}**: {Specific climate finding} → {Recommended strategic response}
+- **{Implication 4}**: {Specific climate finding} → {Recommended strategic response}
+- **{Implication 5}**: {Specific climate finding} → {Recommended strategic response}
+
+---
+
+## Traceability
+
+| Artifact | Document ID | Relationship |
+|----------|-------------|--------------|
+| Wardley Map | ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-WARD-[NNN]-v[VERSION] | Source map; all components assessed in this document are derived from it |
+| Requirements | ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-REQ-v[VERSION] | Climate signals may invalidate or create new requirements |
+| Research | ARC-[PROJECT_ID]-RSCH-v[VERSION] | Market research provides evidence for climate pattern assessment |
+
+## External References
+
+> This section provides traceability from generated content back to source documents.
+> Follow citation instructions in the project's citation reference guide.
+
+### Document Register
+
+| Doc ID | Filename | Type | Source Location | Description |
+|--------|----------|------|-----------------|-------------|
+| *None provided* | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Citations
+
+| Citation ID | Doc ID | Page/Section | Category | Quoted Passage |
+|-------------|--------|--------------|----------|----------------|
+| — | — | — | — | — |
+
+### Unreferenced Documents
+
+| Filename | Source Location | Reason |
+|----------|-----------------|--------|
+| — | — | — |
+
+---
+
+**Generated by**: ArcKit `/arckit:wardley.climate` command
+**Generated on**: [DATE]
+**ArcKit Version**: [VERSION]
+**Project**: [PROJECT_NAME]
+**Model**: [AI_MODEL]