siesa-agents 2.1.40 → 2.1.41

package/bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow-compliance-check/steps/step-02-workflow-validation.md

@@ -1,244 +1,244 @@
----
-name: 'step-02-workflow-validation'
-description: 'Validate workflow.md against workflow-template.md standards'
-
-# Path Definitions
-workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow-compliance-check'
-
-# File References
-thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-02-workflow-validation.md'
-nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-03-step-validation.md'
-workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
-complianceReportFile: '{output_folder}/workflow-compliance-report-{workflow_name}.md'
-targetWorkflowFile: '{target_workflow_path}'
-
-# Template References
-complianceReportTemplate: '{workflow_path}/templates/compliance-report.md'
-
-# Documentation References
-stepTemplate: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmb/docs/workflows/templates/step-template.md'
-workflowTemplate: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmb/docs/workflows/templates/workflow-template.md'
----
-
-# Step 2: Workflow.md Validation
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-Perform adversarial validation of the target workflow.md against workflow-template.md standards, identifying all violations with severity rankings and specific fix recommendations.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are a compliance validator and quality assurance specialist
-- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
-- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
-- ✅ You bring adversarial validation expertise - your success is finding violations
-- ✅ User brings their workflow and needs honest, thorough validation
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus only on workflow.md validation against template standards
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip or minimize any validation checks
-- 💬 Approach: Systematic, thorough adversarial analysis
-- 📋 Document every violation with template reference and severity ranking
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Load and compare target workflow.md against workflow-template.md
-- 💾 Document all violations with specific template references
-- 📖 Rank violations by severity (Critical/Major/Minor)
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to overlook any template violations
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Available context: Validated workflow path and target workflow.md
-- Focus: Systematic validation of workflow.md structure and content
-- Limits: Only workflow.md validation, not step files yet
-- Dependencies: Successful completion of goal confirmation step
-
-## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
-
-### 1. Initialize Compliance Report
-
-"Beginning **Phase 1: Workflow.md Validation**
-Target: `{target_workflow_name}`
-
-**COMPLIANCE STANDARD:** All validation performed against `{workflowTemplate}` - this is THE authoritative standard for workflow.md compliance.
-
-Loading workflow templates and target files for systematic analysis..."
-[Load workflowTemplate, targetWorkflowFile]
-
-### 2. Frontmatter Structure Validation
-
-**Check these elements systematically:**
-
-"**Frontmatter Validation:**"
-
-- Required fields: name, description, web_bundle
-- Proper YAML format and syntax
-- Boolean value format for web_bundle
-- Missing or invalid fields
-
-For each violation found:
-
-- **Template Reference:** Section "Frontmatter Structure" in workflow-template.md
-- **Severity:** Critical (missing required) or Major (format issues)
-- **Specific Fix:** Exact correction needed
-
-### 3. Role Description Validation
-
-**Check role compliance:**
-
-"**Role Description Validation:**"
-
-- Follows partnership format: "In addition to your name, communication_style, and persona, you are also a [role] collaborating with [user type]. This is a partnership, not a client-vendor relationship. You bring [your expertise], while the user brings [their expertise]. Work together as equals."
-- Role accurately describes workflow function
-- User type correctly identified
-- Partnership language present
-
-For violations:
-
-- **Template Reference:** "Your Role" section in workflow-template.md
-- **Severity:** Major (deviation from standard) or Minor (incomplete)
-- **Specific Fix:** Exact wording or structure correction
-
-### 4. Workflow Architecture Validation
-
-**Validate architecture section:**
-
-"**Architecture Validation:**"
-
-- Core Principles section matches template exactly
-- Step Processing Rules includes all 6 rules from template
-- Critical Rules section matches template exactly (NO EXCEPTIONS)
-
-For each deviation:
-
-- **Template Reference:** "WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE" section in workflow-template.md
-- **Severity:** Critical (modified core principles) or Major (missing rules)
-- **Specific Fix:** Restore template-compliant text
-
-### 5. Initialization Sequence Validation
-
-**Check initialization:**
-
-"**Initialization Validation:**"
-
-- Configuration Loading uses correct path format: `{project-root}/_bmad/[module]/config.yaml` (variable substitution pattern)
-- First step follows pattern: `step-01-init.md` OR documented deviation
-- Required config variables properly listed
-- Variables use proper substitution pattern: {project-root}, _bmad, {workflow_path}, etc.
-
-For violations:
-
-- **Template Reference:** "INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE" section in workflow-template.md
-- **Severity:** Major (incorrect paths or missing variables) or Minor (format issues)
-- **Specific Fix:** Use proper variable substitution patterns for flexible installation
-
-### 6. Document Workflow.md Findings
-
-"**Workflow.md Validation Complete**
-Found [X] Critical, [Y] Major, [Z] Minor violations
-
-**Summary:**
-
-- Critical violations must be fixed before workflow can function
-- Major violations impact workflow reliability and maintainability
-- Minor violations are cosmetic but should follow standards
-
-**Next Phase:** Step-by-step validation of all step files..."
-
-### 7. Update Compliance Report
-
-Append to {complianceReportFile}:
-
-```markdown
-## Phase 1: Workflow.md Validation Results
-
-### Template Adherence Analysis
-
-**Reference Standard:** {workflowTemplate}
-
-### Frontmatter Structure Violations
-
-[Document each violation with severity and specific fix]
-
-### Role Description Violations
-
-[Document each violation with template reference and correction]
-
-### Workflow Architecture Violations
-
-[Document each deviation from template standards]
-
-### Initialization Sequence Violations
-
-[Document each path or reference issue]
-
-### Phase 1 Summary
-
-**Critical Issues:** [number]
-**Major Issues:** [number]
-**Minor Issues:** [number]
-
-### Phase 1 Recommendations
-
-[Prioritized fix recommendations with specific actions]
-```
-
-### 8. Continuation Confirmation
-
-"**Phase 1 Complete:** Workflow.md validation finished with detailed violation analysis.
-
-**Ready for Phase 3:** Step-by-step validation against step-template.md
-
-This will check each step file for:
-
-- Frontmatter completeness and format
-- MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES compliance
-- Menu pattern and continuation logic
-- Path variable consistency
-- Template appropriateness
-
-**Select an Option:** [C] Continue to Step Validation [X] Exit"
-
-## Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF C: Save workflow.md findings to report, update frontmatter, then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
-- IF X: Save current findings and end workflow with guidance for resuming
-- IF Any other comments or queries: respond and redisplay menu
-
-## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
-
-ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [workflow.md validation complete with all violations documented], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute and begin step-by-step validation phase.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- Complete workflow.md validation against workflow-template.md
-- All violations documented with severity rankings and template references
-- Specific fix recommendations provided for each violation
-- Compliance report updated with Phase 1 findings
-- User confirms understanding before proceeding
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Skipping any workflow.md validation sections
-- Not documenting violations with specific template references
-- Failing to rank violations by severity
-- Providing vague or incomplete fix recommendations
-- Proceeding without user confirmation of findings
-
-**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
+---
+name: 'step-02-workflow-validation'
+description: 'Validate workflow.md against workflow-template.md standards'
+
+# Path Definitions
+workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow-compliance-check'
+
+# File References
+thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-02-workflow-validation.md'
+nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-03-step-validation.md'
+workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
+complianceReportFile: '{output_folder}/workflow-compliance-report-{workflow_name}.md'
+targetWorkflowFile: '{target_workflow_path}'
+
+# Template References
+complianceReportTemplate: '{workflow_path}/templates/compliance-report.md'
+
+# Documentation References
+stepTemplate: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmb/docs/workflows/templates/step-template.md'
+workflowTemplate: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmb/docs/workflows/templates/workflow-template.md'
+---
+
+# Step 2: Workflow.md Validation
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+Perform adversarial validation of the target workflow.md against workflow-template.md standards, identifying all violations with severity rankings and specific fix recommendations.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are a compliance validator and quality assurance specialist
+- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
+- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
+- ✅ You bring adversarial validation expertise - your success is finding violations
+- ✅ User brings their workflow and needs honest, thorough validation
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Focus only on workflow.md validation against template standards
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip or minimize any validation checks
+- 💬 Approach: Systematic, thorough adversarial analysis
+- 📋 Document every violation with template reference and severity ranking
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Load and compare target workflow.md against workflow-template.md
+- 💾 Document all violations with specific template references
+- 📖 Rank violations by severity (Critical/Major/Minor)
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to overlook any template violations
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: Validated workflow path and target workflow.md
+- Focus: Systematic validation of workflow.md structure and content
+- Limits: Only workflow.md validation, not step files yet
+- Dependencies: Successful completion of goal confirmation step
+
+## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
+
+### 1. Initialize Compliance Report
+
+"Beginning **Phase 1: Workflow.md Validation**
+Target: `{target_workflow_name}`
+
+**COMPLIANCE STANDARD:** All validation performed against `{workflowTemplate}` - this is THE authoritative standard for workflow.md compliance.
+
+Loading workflow templates and target files for systematic analysis..."
+[Load workflowTemplate, targetWorkflowFile]
+
+### 2. Frontmatter Structure Validation
+
+**Check these elements systematically:**
+
+"**Frontmatter Validation:**"
+
+- Required fields: name, description, web_bundle
+- Proper YAML format and syntax
+- Boolean value format for web_bundle
+- Missing or invalid fields
+
+For each violation found:
+
+- **Template Reference:** Section "Frontmatter Structure" in workflow-template.md
+- **Severity:** Critical (missing required) or Major (format issues)
+- **Specific Fix:** Exact correction needed
+
+### 3. Role Description Validation
+
+**Check role compliance:**
+
+"**Role Description Validation:**"
+
+- Follows partnership format: "In addition to your name, communication_style, and persona, you are also a [role] collaborating with [user type]. This is a partnership, not a client-vendor relationship. You bring [your expertise], while the user brings [their expertise]. Work together as equals."
+- Role accurately describes workflow function
+- User type correctly identified
+- Partnership language present
+
+For violations:
+
+- **Template Reference:** "Your Role" section in workflow-template.md
+- **Severity:** Major (deviation from standard) or Minor (incomplete)
+- **Specific Fix:** Exact wording or structure correction
+
+### 4. Workflow Architecture Validation
+
+**Validate architecture section:**
+
+"**Architecture Validation:**"
+
+- Core Principles section matches template exactly
+- Step Processing Rules includes all 6 rules from template
+- Critical Rules section matches template exactly (NO EXCEPTIONS)
+
+For each deviation:
+
+- **Template Reference:** "WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE" section in workflow-template.md
+- **Severity:** Critical (modified core principles) or Major (missing rules)
+- **Specific Fix:** Restore template-compliant text
+
+### 5. Initialization Sequence Validation
+
+**Check initialization:**
+
+"**Initialization Validation:**"
+
+- Configuration Loading uses correct path format: `{project-root}/_bmad/[module]/config.yaml` (variable substitution pattern)
+- First step follows pattern: `step-01-init.md` OR documented deviation
+- Required config variables properly listed
+- Variables use proper substitution pattern: {project-root}, _bmad, {workflow_path}, etc.
+
+For violations:
+
+- **Template Reference:** "INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE" section in workflow-template.md
+- **Severity:** Major (incorrect paths or missing variables) or Minor (format issues)
+- **Specific Fix:** Use proper variable substitution patterns for flexible installation
+
+### 6. Document Workflow.md Findings
+
+"**Workflow.md Validation Complete**
+Found [X] Critical, [Y] Major, [Z] Minor violations
+
+**Summary:**
+
+- Critical violations must be fixed before workflow can function
+- Major violations impact workflow reliability and maintainability
+- Minor violations are cosmetic but should follow standards
+
+**Next Phase:** Step-by-step validation of all step files..."
+
+### 7. Update Compliance Report
+
+Append to {complianceReportFile}:
+
+```markdown
+## Phase 1: Workflow.md Validation Results
+
+### Template Adherence Analysis
+
+**Reference Standard:** {workflowTemplate}
+
+### Frontmatter Structure Violations
+
+[Document each violation with severity and specific fix]
+
+### Role Description Violations
+
+[Document each violation with template reference and correction]
+
+### Workflow Architecture Violations
+
+[Document each deviation from template standards]
+
+### Initialization Sequence Violations
+
+[Document each path or reference issue]
+
+### Phase 1 Summary
+
+**Critical Issues:** [number]
+**Major Issues:** [number]
+**Minor Issues:** [number]
+
+### Phase 1 Recommendations
+
+[Prioritized fix recommendations with specific actions]
+```
+
+### 8. Continuation Confirmation
+
+"**Phase 1 Complete:** Workflow.md validation finished with detailed violation analysis.
+
+**Ready for Phase 3:** Step-by-step validation against step-template.md
+
+This will check each step file for:
+
+- Frontmatter completeness and format
+- MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES compliance
+- Menu pattern and continuation logic
+- Path variable consistency
+- Template appropriateness
+
+**Select an Option:** [C] Continue to Step Validation [X] Exit"
+
+## Menu Handling Logic:
+
+- IF C: Save workflow.md findings to report, update frontmatter, then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
+- IF X: Save current findings and end workflow with guidance for resuming
+- IF Any other comments or queries: respond and redisplay menu
+
+## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
+
+ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [workflow.md validation complete with all violations documented], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute and begin step-by-step validation phase.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Complete workflow.md validation against workflow-template.md
+- All violations documented with severity rankings and template references
+- Specific fix recommendations provided for each violation
+- Compliance report updated with Phase 1 findings
+- User confirms understanding before proceeding
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Skipping any workflow.md validation sections
+- Not documenting violations with specific template references
+- Failing to rank violations by severity
+- Providing vague or incomplete fix recommendations
+- Proceeding without user confirmation of findings
+
+**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.