bmad-plus 0.7.5 → 0.9.0

package/src/bmad-plus/packs/pack-dev-studio/categories/implementation/code-review-steps/step-03-triage.md

@@ -1,49 +1,49 @@
----
----
-
-# Step 3: Triage
-
-## RULES
-
-- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-- Be precise. When uncertain between categories, prefer the more conservative classification.
-
-## INSTRUCTIONS
-
-1. **Normalize** findings into a common format. Expected input formats:
-   - Adversarial (Blind Hunter): markdown list of descriptions
-   - Edge Case Hunter: JSON array with `location`, `trigger_condition`, `guard_snippet`, `potential_consequence` fields
-   - Acceptance Auditor: markdown list with title, AC/constraint reference, and evidence
-
-   If a layer's output does not match its expected format, attempt best-effort parsing. Note any parsing issues for the user.
-
-   Convert all to a unified list where each finding has:
-   - `id` -- sequential integer
-   - `source` -- `blind`, `edge`, `auditor`, or merged sources (e.g., `blind+edge`)
-   - `title` -- one-line summary
-   - `detail` -- full description
-   - `location` -- file and line reference (if available)
-
-2. **Deduplicate.** If two or more findings describe the same issue, merge them into one:
-   - Use the most specific finding as the base (prefer edge-case JSON with location over adversarial prose).
-   - Append any unique detail, reasoning, or location references from the other finding(s) into the surviving `detail` field.
-   - Set `source` to the merged sources (e.g., `blind+edge`).
-
-3. **Classify** each finding into exactly one bucket:
-   - **decision_needed** -- There is an ambiguous choice that requires human input. The code cannot be correctly patched without knowing the user's intent. Only possible if `{review_mode}` = `"full"`.
-   - **patch** -- Code issue that is fixable without human input. The correct fix is unambiguous.
-   - **defer** -- Pre-existing issue not caused by the current change. Real but not actionable now.
-   - **dismiss** -- Noise, false positive, or handled elsewhere.
-
-   If `{review_mode}` = `"no-spec"` and a finding would otherwise be `decision_needed`, reclassify it as `patch` (if the fix is unambiguous) or `defer` (if not).
-
-4. **Drop** all `dismiss` findings. Record the dismiss count for the summary.
-
-5. If `{failed_layers}` is non-empty, report which layers failed before announcing results. If zero findings remain after dropping dismissed AND `{failed_layers}` is non-empty, warn the user that the review may be incomplete rather than announcing a clean review.
-
-6. If zero findings remain after triage (all rejected or none raised): state "✅ Clean review — all layers passed." (Step 3 already warned if any review layers failed via `{failed_layers}`.)
-
-
-## NEXT
-
-Read fully and follow `./step-04-present.md`
+---
+---
+
+# Step 3: Triage
+
+## RULES
+
+- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+- Be precise. When uncertain between categories, prefer the more conservative classification.
+
+## INSTRUCTIONS
+
+1. **Normalize** findings into a common format. Expected input formats:
+   - Adversarial (Blind Hunter): markdown list of descriptions
+   - Edge Case Hunter: JSON array with `location`, `trigger_condition`, `guard_snippet`, `potential_consequence` fields
+   - Acceptance Auditor: markdown list with title, AC/constraint reference, and evidence
+
+   If a layer's output does not match its expected format, attempt best-effort parsing. Note any parsing issues for the user.
+
+   Convert all to a unified list where each finding has:
+   - `id` -- sequential integer
+   - `source` -- `blind`, `edge`, `auditor`, or merged sources (e.g., `blind+edge`)
+   - `title` -- one-line summary
+   - `detail` -- full description
+   - `location` -- file and line reference (if available)
+
+2. **Deduplicate.** If two or more findings describe the same issue, merge them into one:
+   - Use the most specific finding as the base (prefer edge-case JSON with location over adversarial prose).
+   - Append any unique detail, reasoning, or location references from the other finding(s) into the surviving `detail` field.
+   - Set `source` to the merged sources (e.g., `blind+edge`).
+
+3. **Classify** each finding into exactly one bucket:
+   - **decision_needed** -- There is an ambiguous choice that requires human input. The code cannot be correctly patched without knowing the user's intent. Only possible if `{review_mode}` = `"full"`.
+   - **patch** -- Code issue that is fixable without human input. The correct fix is unambiguous.
+   - **defer** -- Pre-existing issue not caused by the current change. Real but not actionable now.
+   - **dismiss** -- Noise, false positive, or handled elsewhere.
+
+   If `{review_mode}` = `"no-spec"` and a finding would otherwise be `decision_needed`, reclassify it as `patch` (if the fix is unambiguous) or `defer` (if not).
+
+4. **Drop** all `dismiss` findings. Record the dismiss count for the summary.
+
+5. If `{failed_layers}` is non-empty, report which layers failed before announcing results. If zero findings remain after dropping dismissed AND `{failed_layers}` is non-empty, warn the user that the review may be incomplete rather than announcing a clean review.
+
+6. If zero findings remain after triage (all rejected or none raised): state "✅ Clean review — all layers passed." (Step 3 already warned if any review layers failed via `{failed_layers}`.)
+
+
+## NEXT
+
+Read fully and follow `./step-04-present.md`

package/src/bmad-plus/packs/pack-dev-studio/categories/implementation/code-review-steps/step-04-present.md

@@ -1,132 +1,132 @@
----
-deferred_work_file: '{implementation_artifacts}/deferred-work.md'
----
-
-# Step 4: Present and Act
-
-## RULES
-
-- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-- When `{spec_file}` is set, always write findings to the story file before offering action choices.
-- `decision-needed` findings must be resolved before handling `patch` findings.
-
-## INSTRUCTIONS
-
-### 1. Clean review shortcut
-
-If zero findings remain after triage (all dismissed or none raised): state that and proceed to section 6 (Sprint Status Update).
-
-### 2. Write findings to the story file
-
-If `{spec_file}` exists and contains a Tasks/Subtasks section, append a `### Review Findings` subsection. Write all findings in this order:
-
-1. **`decision-needed`** findings (unchecked):
-   `- [ ] [Review][Decision] <Title> — <Detail>`
-
-2. **`patch`** findings (unchecked):
-   `- [ ] [Review][Patch] <Title> [<file>:<line>]`
-
-3. **`defer`** findings (checked off, marked deferred):
-   `- [x] [Review][Defer] <Title> [<file>:<line>] — deferred, pre-existing`
-
-Also append each `defer` finding to `{deferred_work_file}` under a heading `## Deferred from: code review ({date})`. If `{spec_file}` is set, include its basename in the heading (e.g., `code review of story-3.3 (2026-03-18)`). One bullet per finding with description.
-
-### 3. Present summary
-
-Announce what was written:
-
-> **Code review complete.** <D> `decision-needed`, <P> `patch`, <W> `defer`, <R> dismissed as noise.
-
-If `{spec_file}` is set, add: `Findings written to the review findings section in {spec_file}.`
-Otherwise add: `Findings are listed above. No story file was provided, so nothing was persisted.`
-
-### 4. Resolve decision-needed findings
-
-If `decision_needed` findings exist, present each one with its detail and the options available. The user must decide — the correct fix is ambiguous without their input. Walk through each finding (or batch related ones) and get the user's call. Once resolved, each becomes a `patch`, `defer`, or is dismissed.
-
-If the user chooses to defer, ask: Quick one-line reason for deferring this item? (helps future reviews): — then append that reason to both the story file bullet and the `{deferred_work_file}` entry.
-
-**HALT** — I am waiting for your numbered choice. Reply with only the number. Do not proceed until you select an option.
-
-### 5. Handle `patch` findings
-
-If `patch` findings exist (including any resolved from step 4), HALT. Ask the user:
-
-If `{spec_file}` is set, present all three options:
-
-> **How would you like to handle the `<P>` `patch` findings?**
-> 1. **Apply every patch** — fix all of them now, no per-finding confirmation. Defer and decision-needed items are not touched.
-> 2. **Leave as action items** — they are already in the story file
-> 3. **Walk through each patch** — show details for each before deciding
-
-If `{spec_file}` is **not** set, present only options 1 and 2 (omit "Leave as action items" — findings were not written to a file):
-
-> **How would you like to handle the `<P>` `patch` findings?**
-> 1. **Apply every patch** — fix all of them now, no per-finding confirmation. Defer and decision-needed items are not touched.
-> 2. **Walk through each patch** — show details for each before deciding
-
-**HALT** — I am waiting for your numbered choice. Reply with only the number. Do not proceed until you select an option.
-
-- **Apply every patch**: Apply every patch finding without per-finding confirmation. Do not modify defer or decision-needed items. After all patches are applied, present a summary of changes made. If `{spec_file}` is set, check off the patch items in the story file (leave defer items as-is).
-- **Leave as action items** (only when `{spec_file}` is set): Done — findings are already written to the story.
-- **Walk through each patch**: Present each finding with full detail, diff context, and suggested fix. After walkthrough, re-offer the applicable options above.
-
-  **HALT** — I am waiting for your numbered choice. Do not proceed until you select an option.
-
-**✅ Code review actions complete**
-
-- Decision-needed resolved: <D>
-- Patches handled: <P>
-- Deferred: <W>
-- Dismissed: <R>
-
-### 6. Update story status and sync sprint tracking
-
-Skip this section if `{spec_file}` is not set.
-
-#### Determine new status based on review outcome
-
-- If all `decision-needed` and `patch` findings were resolved (fixed or dismissed) AND no unresolved HIGH/MEDIUM issues remain: set `{new_status}` = `done`. Update the story file Status section to `done`.
-- If `patch` findings were left as action items, or unresolved issues remain: set `{new_status}` = `in-progress`. Update the story file Status section to `in-progress`.
-
-Save the story file.
-
-#### Sync sprint-status.yaml
-
-If `{story_key}` is not set, skip this subsection and note that sprint status was not synced because no story key was available.
-
-If `{sprint_status}` file exists:
-
-1. Load the FULL `{sprint_status}` file.
-2. Find the `development_status` entry matching `{story_key}`.
-3. If found: update `development_status[{story_key}]` to `{new_status}`. Update `last_updated` to current date. Save the file, preserving ALL comments and structure including STATUS DEFINITIONS.
-4. If `{story_key}` not found in sprint status: warn the user that the story file was updated but sprint-status sync failed.
-
-If `{sprint_status}` file does not exist, note that story status was updated in the story file only.
-
-#### Completion summary
-
-> **Review Complete!**
->
-> **Story Status:** `{new_status}`
-> **Issues Fixed:** <fixed_count>
-> **Action Items Created:** <action_count>
-> **Deferred:** <W>
-> **Dismissed:** <R>
-
-### 7. Next steps
-
-Present the user with follow-up options:
-
-> **What would you like to do next?**
-> 1. **Start the next story** — run `dev-story` to pick up the next `ready-for-dev` story
-> 2. **Re-run code review** — address findings and review again
-> 3. **Done** — end the workflow
-
-**HALT** — I am waiting for your choice. Do not proceed until the user selects an option.
-
-## On Complete
-
-<!-- Adapted for BMAD+: original script dependency removed -->
-
+---
+deferred_work_file: '{implementation_artifacts}/deferred-work.md'
+---
+
+# Step 4: Present and Act
+
+## RULES
+
+- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+- When `{spec_file}` is set, always write findings to the story file before offering action choices.
+- `decision-needed` findings must be resolved before handling `patch` findings.
+
+## INSTRUCTIONS
+
+### 1. Clean review shortcut
+
+If zero findings remain after triage (all dismissed or none raised): state that and proceed to section 6 (Sprint Status Update).
+
+### 2. Write findings to the story file
+
+If `{spec_file}` exists and contains a Tasks/Subtasks section, append a `### Review Findings` subsection. Write all findings in this order:
+
+1. **`decision-needed`** findings (unchecked):
+   `- [ ] [Review][Decision] <Title> — <Detail>`
+
+2. **`patch`** findings (unchecked):
+   `- [ ] [Review][Patch] <Title> [<file>:<line>]`
+
+3. **`defer`** findings (checked off, marked deferred):
+   `- [x] [Review][Defer] <Title> [<file>:<line>] — deferred, pre-existing`
+
+Also append each `defer` finding to `{deferred_work_file}` under a heading `## Deferred from: code review ({date})`. If `{spec_file}` is set, include its basename in the heading (e.g., `code review of story-3.3 (2026-03-18)`). One bullet per finding with description.
+
+### 3. Present summary
+
+Announce what was written:
+
+> **Code review complete.** <D> `decision-needed`, <P> `patch`, <W> `defer`, <R> dismissed as noise.
+
+If `{spec_file}` is set, add: `Findings written to the review findings section in {spec_file}.`
+Otherwise add: `Findings are listed above. No story file was provided, so nothing was persisted.`
+
+### 4. Resolve decision-needed findings
+
+If `decision_needed` findings exist, present each one with its detail and the options available. The user must decide — the correct fix is ambiguous without their input. Walk through each finding (or batch related ones) and get the user's call. Once resolved, each becomes a `patch`, `defer`, or is dismissed.
+
+If the user chooses to defer, ask: Quick one-line reason for deferring this item? (helps future reviews): — then append that reason to both the story file bullet and the `{deferred_work_file}` entry.
+
+**HALT** — I am waiting for your numbered choice. Reply with only the number. Do not proceed until you select an option.
+
+### 5. Handle `patch` findings
+
+If `patch` findings exist (including any resolved from step 4), HALT. Ask the user:
+
+If `{spec_file}` is set, present all three options:
+
+> **How would you like to handle the `<P>` `patch` findings?**
+> 1. **Apply every patch** — fix all of them now, no per-finding confirmation. Defer and decision-needed items are not touched.
+> 2. **Leave as action items** — they are already in the story file
+> 3. **Walk through each patch** — show details for each before deciding
+
+If `{spec_file}` is **not** set, present only options 1 and 2 (omit "Leave as action items" — findings were not written to a file):
+
+> **How would you like to handle the `<P>` `patch` findings?**
+> 1. **Apply every patch** — fix all of them now, no per-finding confirmation. Defer and decision-needed items are not touched.
+> 2. **Walk through each patch** — show details for each before deciding
+
+**HALT** — I am waiting for your numbered choice. Reply with only the number. Do not proceed until you select an option.
+
+- **Apply every patch**: Apply every patch finding without per-finding confirmation. Do not modify defer or decision-needed items. After all patches are applied, present a summary of changes made. If `{spec_file}` is set, check off the patch items in the story file (leave defer items as-is).
+- **Leave as action items** (only when `{spec_file}` is set): Done — findings are already written to the story.
+- **Walk through each patch**: Present each finding with full detail, diff context, and suggested fix. After walkthrough, re-offer the applicable options above.
+
+  **HALT** — I am waiting for your numbered choice. Do not proceed until you select an option.
+
+**✅ Code review actions complete**
+
+- Decision-needed resolved: <D>
+- Patches handled: <P>
+- Deferred: <W>
+- Dismissed: <R>
+
+### 6. Update story status and sync sprint tracking
+
+Skip this section if `{spec_file}` is not set.
+
+#### Determine new status based on review outcome
+
+- If all `decision-needed` and `patch` findings were resolved (fixed or dismissed) AND no unresolved HIGH/MEDIUM issues remain: set `{new_status}` = `done`. Update the story file Status section to `done`.
+- If `patch` findings were left as action items, or unresolved issues remain: set `{new_status}` = `in-progress`. Update the story file Status section to `in-progress`.
+
+Save the story file.
+
+#### Sync sprint-status.yaml
+
+If `{story_key}` is not set, skip this subsection and note that sprint status was not synced because no story key was available.
+
+If `{sprint_status}` file exists:
+
+1. Load the FULL `{sprint_status}` file.
+2. Find the `development_status` entry matching `{story_key}`.
+3. If found: update `development_status[{story_key}]` to `{new_status}`. Update `last_updated` to current date. Save the file, preserving ALL comments and structure including STATUS DEFINITIONS.
+4. If `{story_key}` not found in sprint status: warn the user that the story file was updated but sprint-status sync failed.
+
+If `{sprint_status}` file does not exist, note that story status was updated in the story file only.
+
+#### Completion summary
+
+> **Review Complete!**
+>
+> **Story Status:** `{new_status}`
+> **Issues Fixed:** <fixed_count>
+> **Action Items Created:** <action_count>
+> **Deferred:** <W>
+> **Dismissed:** <R>
+
+### 7. Next steps
+
+Present the user with follow-up options:
+
+> **What would you like to do next?**
+> 1. **Start the next story** — run `dev-story` to pick up the next `ready-for-dev` story
+> 2. **Re-run code review** — address findings and review again
+> 3. **Done** — end the workflow
+
+**HALT** — I am waiting for your choice. Do not proceed until the user selects an option.
+
+## On Complete
+
+<!-- Adapted for BMAD+: original script dependency removed -->
+
 If the resolved `workflow.on_complete` is non-empty, follow it as the final terminal instruction before exiting.

package/src/bmad-plus/packs/pack-dev-studio/categories/implementation/code-review.md

@@ -1,90 +1,90 @@
----
-name: bmad-code-review
-description: 'Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"'
----
-
-# Code Review Workflow
-
-**Goal:** Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers and structured triage.
-
-**Your Role:** You are an elite code reviewer. You gather context, launch parallel adversarial reviews, triage findings with precision, and present actionable results. No noise, no filler.
-
-## Conventions
-
-- Bare paths (e.g. `checklist.md`) resolve from the skill root.
-- `this skill directory` resolves to this skill's installed directory (where `agent configuration` lives).
-- `{project-root}`-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.
-- `{skill-name}` resolves to the skill directory's basename.
-
-## On Activation
-
-### Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block
-
-<!-- Adapted for BMAD+: original script dependency removed -->
-
-**If the script fails**, resolve the `workflow` block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:
-
-1. `this skill file` — defaults
-2. `{project-root}/custom/{skill-name}.toml` — team overrides
-3. `{project-root}/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml` — personal overrides
-
-Any missing file is skipped. Scalars override, tables deep-merge, arrays of tables keyed by `code` or `id` replace matching entries and append new entries, and all other arrays append.
-
-### Step 2: Execute Prepend Steps
-
-Execute each entry in `{workflow.activation_steps_prepend}` in order before proceeding.
-
-### Step 3: Load Persistent Facts
-
-Treat every entry in `{workflow.persistent_facts}` as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run. Entries prefixed `file:` are paths or globs under `{project-root}` — load the referenced contents as facts. All other entries are facts verbatim.
-
-### Step 4: Load Config
-
-Load config from `{project-root}/project config` and resolve:
-
-- `project_name`, `planning_artifacts`, `implementation_artifacts`, `user_name`
-- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
-- `date` as system-generated current datetime
-- `sprint_status` = `{implementation_artifacts}/sprint-status.yaml`
-- `project_context` = `**/project-context.md` (load if exists)
-- CLAUDE.md / memory files (load if exist)
-- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Step 5: Greet the User
-
-Greet `{user_name}`, speaking in `{communication_language}`.
-
-### Step 6: Execute Append Steps
-
-Execute each entry in `{workflow.activation_steps_append}` in order.
-
-Activation is complete. Begin the workflow below.
-
-## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
-
-This uses **step-file architecture** for disciplined execution:
-
-- **Micro-file Design**: Each step is self-contained and followed exactly
-- **Just-In-Time Loading**: Only load the current step file
-- **Sequential Enforcement**: Complete steps in order, no skipping
-- **State Tracking**: Persist progress via in-memory variables
-- **Append-Only Building**: Build artifacts incrementally
-
-### Step Processing Rules
-
-1. **READ COMPLETELY**: Read the entire step file before acting
-2. **FOLLOW SEQUENCE**: Execute sections in order
-3. **WAIT FOR INPUT**: Halt at checkpoints and wait for human
-4. **LOAD NEXT**: When directed, read fully and follow the next step file
-
-### Critical Rules (NO EXCEPTIONS)
-
-- **NEVER** load multiple step files simultaneously
-- **ALWAYS** read entire step file before execution
-- **NEVER** skip steps or optimize the sequence
-- **ALWAYS** follow the exact instructions in the step file
-- **ALWAYS** halt at checkpoints and wait for human input
-
-## FIRST STEP
-
+---
+name: bmad-code-review
+description: 'Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"'
+---
+
+# Code Review Workflow
+
+**Goal:** Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers and structured triage.
+
+**Your Role:** You are an elite code reviewer. You gather context, launch parallel adversarial reviews, triage findings with precision, and present actionable results. No noise, no filler.
+
+## Conventions
+
+- Bare paths (e.g. `checklist.md`) resolve from the skill root.
+- `this skill directory` resolves to this skill's installed directory (where `agent configuration` lives).
+- `{project-root}`-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.
+- `{skill-name}` resolves to the skill directory's basename.
+
+## On Activation
+
+### Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block
+
+<!-- Adapted for BMAD+: original script dependency removed -->
+
+**If the script fails**, resolve the `workflow` block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:
+
+1. `this skill file` — defaults
+2. `{project-root}/custom/{skill-name}.toml` — team overrides
+3. `{project-root}/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml` — personal overrides
+
+Any missing file is skipped. Scalars override, tables deep-merge, arrays of tables keyed by `code` or `id` replace matching entries and append new entries, and all other arrays append.
+
+### Step 2: Execute Prepend Steps
+
+Execute each entry in `{workflow.activation_steps_prepend}` in order before proceeding.
+
+### Step 3: Load Persistent Facts
+
+Treat every entry in `{workflow.persistent_facts}` as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run. Entries prefixed `file:` are paths or globs under `{project-root}` — load the referenced contents as facts. All other entries are facts verbatim.
+
+### Step 4: Load Config
+
+Load config from `{project-root}/project config` and resolve:
+
+- `project_name`, `planning_artifacts`, `implementation_artifacts`, `user_name`
+- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
+- `date` as system-generated current datetime
+- `sprint_status` = `{implementation_artifacts}/sprint-status.yaml`
+- `project_context` = `**/project-context.md` (load if exists)
+- CLAUDE.md / memory files (load if exist)
+- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+### Step 5: Greet the User
+
+Greet `{user_name}`, speaking in `{communication_language}`.
+
+### Step 6: Execute Append Steps
+
+Execute each entry in `{workflow.activation_steps_append}` in order.
+
+Activation is complete. Begin the workflow below.
+
+## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
+
+This uses **step-file architecture** for disciplined execution:
+
+- **Micro-file Design**: Each step is self-contained and followed exactly
+- **Just-In-Time Loading**: Only load the current step file
+- **Sequential Enforcement**: Complete steps in order, no skipping
+- **State Tracking**: Persist progress via in-memory variables
+- **Append-Only Building**: Build artifacts incrementally
+
+### Step Processing Rules
+
+1. **READ COMPLETELY**: Read the entire step file before acting
+2. **FOLLOW SEQUENCE**: Execute sections in order
+3. **WAIT FOR INPUT**: Halt at checkpoints and wait for human
+4. **LOAD NEXT**: When directed, read fully and follow the next step file
+
+### Critical Rules (NO EXCEPTIONS)
+
+- **NEVER** load multiple step files simultaneously
+- **ALWAYS** read entire step file before execution
+- **NEVER** skip steps or optimize the sequence
+- **ALWAYS** follow the exact instructions in the step file
+- **ALWAYS** halt at checkpoints and wait for human input
+
+## FIRST STEP
+
 Read fully and follow: `./steps/step-01-gather-context.md`