bmad-plus 0.7.5 → 0.9.0

package/src/bmad-plus/packs/pack-shield/references/nist-800-53/baselines-tailoring.md

@@ -1,277 +1,277 @@
-# NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 — Baselines, Tailoring, and Overlays Reference
-
-## SP 800-53B — Control Baselines
-
-SP 800-53B (October 2020) is the companion publication that separates the control baselines from the main SP 800-53 catalog.
-
-### Low Impact Baseline
-
-**Used for:** Systems where the loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability would have limited adverse effects.
-
-**Examples:** Public-facing websites, internal collaboration tools with non-sensitive data, reference databases.
-
-**Approximate scope:** ~156 controls and enhancements across 20 families (not counting PM family).
-
-**Key characteristics:**
-- Policy and procedure controls required for every family
-- Basic access controls (AC-2 account management, AC-3 enforcement, AC-7 logon limits)
-- Fundamental audit logging (AU-2 through AU-12)
-- MFA required for privileged accounts (IA-2(1)) — extended post-EO 14028
-- Basic boundary protection (SC-7) without detailed enhancement requirements
-- Incident response plan (IR-8), incident reporting (IR-6)
-- Vulnerability scanning (RA-5) — frequency defined by ODV
-
-### Moderate Impact Baseline
-
-**Used for:** Systems where a security breach could have serious adverse effects on organizational operations, assets, or individuals.
-
-**Examples:** HR systems with PII, financial management systems, internal collaboration with sensitive data, most federal agency systems.
-
-**Approximate scope:** ~323 controls and enhancements across 20 families.
-
-**Key additions over Low:**
-- Automated account management (AC-2(1)), inactivity controls (AC-2(3)(5))
-- Information flow enforcement (AC-4), separation of duties (AC-5)
-- Least privilege requirements (AC-6 through AC-6(10))
-- SIEM integration for audit (AU-6(1))
-- Independent assessors (CA-2(1))
-- Continuous monitoring with defined frequencies (CA-7)
-- Configuration change control (CM-3), baseline automation (CM-2(2))
-- Alternate storage and processing sites (CP-6, CP-7)
-- Device and non-org user authentication (IA-3, IA-8)
-- PKI/PIV support (IA-2(12), IA-5(2))
-- Incident response testing (IR-3)
-- Developer security testing (SA-11), configuration management (SA-10)
-- Transmission protection (SC-8(1) — TLS required)
-- Encryption at rest (SC-28(1))
-- Software integrity verification (SI-7(1))
-- Supply chain plan and controls (SR-2, SR-3, SR-5 through SR-8, SR-11, SR-12)
-
-### High Impact Baseline
-
-**Used for:** Systems where a breach could have severe or catastrophic effects on national security, safety of human life, or major financial damage.
-
-**Examples:** National security systems, financial systems holding critical data, emergency services, election systems.
-
-**Approximate scope:** ~422 controls and enhancements across 20 families.
-
-**Key additions over Moderate:**
-- Account monitoring for atypical usage (AC-2(12))
-- Penetration testing (CA-8)
-- Insider threat program integration (AT-2(2) at org level; PM-12)
-- Threat hunting (RA-10)
-- Non-repudiation (AU-10)
-- Session audit (AU-14)
-- Supply chain team, tamper resistance, counterfeit prevention (SR-2(1), SR-6(1), SR-9 through SR-11(1))
-- Developer architecture review (SA-17)
-- All SI family controls including function verification (SI-6)
-- Enhanced cryptographic protections
-
----
-
-## Control Baselines by Family — Quick Reference
-
-| Family | L Controls | M Controls | H Controls |
-|--------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
-| AC | 8 | 18 | 20 |
-| AT | 4 | 5 | 6 |
-| AU | 10 | 14 | 15 |
-| CA | 6 | 8 | 9 |
-| CM | 8 | 14 | 14 |
-| CP | 7 | 12 | 13 |
-| IA | 8 | 12 | 14 |
-| IR | 7 | 9 | 10 |
-| MA | 3 | 6 | 6 |
-| MP | 3 | 6 | 7 |
-| PE | 11 | 15 | 18 |
-| PL | 4 | 6 | 7 |
-| PS | 8 | 9 | 9 |
-| PT | varies | varies | varies |
-| RA | 5 | 8 | 9 |
-| SA | 7 | 16 | 17 |
-| SC | 14 | 24 | 29 |
-| SI | 9 | 17 | 19 |
-| SR | 1 | 9 | 12 |
-| PM | org-wide | org-wide | org-wide |
-
----
-
-## Tailoring Process (SP 800-53B Section 2)
-
-Tailoring produces a system-specific set of controls from the starting baseline. Document all tailoring decisions in the SSP.
-
-### Tailoring Step 1 — Identify Common Controls
-
-**Common controls** (also called "inherited controls") are implemented at the organization or facility level and inherited by multiple systems:
-
-| Example | Control | Implemented By |
-|---------|---------|---------------|
-| Enterprise firewall | SC-7 | Network Operations |
-| Badge access system | PE-3 | Facilities |
-| Enterprise AV solution | SI-3 | IT Security |
-| Security awareness training | AT-2 | ISSO / HR |
-| Physical data center security | PE-2, PE-13 | Data Center Ops |
-
-**Designation types:**
-- **Common:** Fully inherited from another system/organization
-- **System-specific:** Implemented entirely by the system
-- **Hybrid:** Partially inherited, partially system-specific
-
-Document in SSP Section: Common Control Inheritance table.
-
-### Tailoring Step 2 — Apply Scoping Considerations
-
-Remove controls that are not applicable based on:
-
-| Scoping Consideration | Example |
-|----------------------|---------|
-| Technology not present | MA-4 (remote maintenance) if system has no remote maintenance capability |
-| Physical location | PE-3 not applicable for cloud-hosted system (inherited from CSP) |
-| Mission/operational need | AC-18 (wireless) not applicable for air-gapped system |
-| Applicable laws/regulations | Some PT controls not applicable if no PII processed |
-
-**Document every scoping decision** in the SSP with rationale. Regulators and auditors will scrutinize unjustified scoping.
-
-### Tailoring Step 3 — Organization-Defined Values (ODVs)
-
-Every control with brackets `[Assignment: ...]` requires an ODV. Failure to fill in ODVs is a common SSP finding.
-
-**High-priority ODVs to define:**
-
-| Control | Parameter | Federal Guidance | Example Value |
-|---------|-----------|-----------------|---------------|
-| AC-2(3) | Inactivity period before disable | OMB M-22-09: 90 days | 90 days |
-| AC-7 | Max login attempts before lockout | NIST guidance: 3–5 | 3 attempts |
-| AC-11 | Session inactivity before lock | OMB M-22-09: 15 minutes | 15 minutes |
-| AU-11 | Audit log retention | NARA/OMB: 3 years minimum | 3 years |
-| CA-7 | ConMon assessment frequency | FedRAMP: monthly/annually | Monthly for controls; annually for pen test |
-| IA-5(1)(a) | Minimum password length | NIST SP 800-63B: 8+; typical federal: 15+ | 15 characters |
-| IA-5(1)(h) | Password complexity | NIST SP 800-63B: no complexity requirements (memorized secrets) | No composition rules |
-| RA-5 | Vulnerability scan frequency | CISA BOD 19-02; FedRAMP: monthly OS, weekly DB | Monthly OS scans |
-| SI-2 | Patch critical vulns within | CISA BOD 19-02: 15 days Critical | 15 days critical; 30 days high |
-
-### Tailoring Step 4 — Compensating Controls
-
-A **compensating control** provides equivalent security when the baseline control cannot be implemented as written:
-
-**Requirements for compensating controls:**
-1. Must be as effective as the original control
-2. Must be documented with rationale
-3. Must not create additional risk
-4. Must be assessed as part of the authorization
-5. Must be reviewed at each authorization renewal
-
-**Example:** If a legacy system cannot implement IA-2(1) (MFA for privileged accounts), a compensating control could be: enhanced privileged access monitoring (AC-2(12)) + strict IP allowlisting + privileged access workstations + session recording.
-
-### Tailoring Step 5 — Supplementing the Baseline
-
-Add controls beyond the baseline when:
-- Risk assessment identifies elevated threats
-- Agency or system-specific security requirements demand it
-- Laws, regulations, or policies require additional protections
-- System processes highly sensitive data not reflected in impact level
-
----
-
-## Overlays
-
-### What is an Overlay?
-
-An overlay is a pre-tailored baseline for a specific community of interest, technology type, or operating environment. Overlays save time and promote consistency — organizations apply the overlay instead of performing baseline tailoring from scratch.
-
-### FedRAMP Overlay
-
-**Scope:** Cloud services offered to federal agencies.
-
-Key FedRAMP additions to SP 800-53 Moderate baseline:
-- Specific ODV values (e.g., AU-11: 1 year; RA-5: monthly for all vulnerability types)
-- FedRAMP-specific controls (e.g., FedRAMP-specific ConMon requirements)
-- Required 3PAO (Third Party Assessment Organization) for independent assessment
-- Continuous monitoring reporting: monthly vulnerability reports, annual pen test, POA&M updates
-- JAB (Joint Authorization Board) authorization for P-ATO vs. Agency ATO path
-
-### DoD/CNSS Overlay (CNSS Instruction 1253)
-
-**Scope:** National Security Systems (NSS) — classified or intelligence systems.
-
-Key additions:
-- Higher baseline requirements for NSS systems
-- CNSS-specific control parameters
-- Applies to systems handling Classified National Security Information (CNSI)
-- Coordination with Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 503
-
-### Privacy Overlay
-
-**Scope:** Systems processing PII at scale.
-
-- All 8 PT family controls required
-- Enhanced PM privacy controls (PM-18 through PM-27)
-- Privacy Impact Assessments (PTA/PIA) required
-- SORN required for Privacy Act systems
-- Data minimization and retention requirements
-
-### ICS/SCADA Overlay
-
-**Scope:** Industrial Control Systems, SCADA, Operational Technology.
-
-Reference: **NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3** — Guide to OT Security.
-- Availability prioritized over confidentiality
-- Real-time processing constraints affect control applicability
-- Legacy system accommodations
-- Safety system isolation requirements
-- Physical process monitoring integration
-
----
-
-## Privacy Baseline (PT Family) — Detailed
-
-### Privacy Act Connection
-
-The **Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a)** applies to federal agencies' systems of records (SOR). SP 800-53 PT controls implement Privacy Act requirements:
-
-| PT Control | Privacy Act Requirement |
-|-----------|------------------------|
-| PT-5 | Privacy Act notice at collection |
-| PT-6 | System of Records Notice (SORN) published in Federal Register |
-| PT-8 | Computer matching agreements |
-
-### Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)
-
-Required by the **E-Government Act of 2002** for new or substantially modified IT systems collecting PII:
-- Document what PII is collected and why
-- How PII is used, secured, and shared
-- Access controls and retention
-- Published on agency website (unless classified)
-
-Related controls: PL-2 (SSP includes privacy requirements), RA-3 (privacy risk assessment).
-
----
-
-## Supply Chain Risk Management (SR Family) — Details
-
-### SCRM Plan (SR-2)
-
-Document organization's SCRM approach:
-- Component criticality (SR-4 provenance)
-- Supplier risk criteria and assessment process (SR-6)
-- Acquisition requirements (SR-5)
-- Component authenticity verification (SR-11)
-- Notification agreements with suppliers (SR-8)
-
-### SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
-
-EO 14028 and CISA requirements have increased SBOM expectations. SBOMs support:
-- SR-4 (Provenance) — knowing where software components came from
-- SR-11 (Component Authenticity) — verifying software integrity
-- SA-4 (Acquisition) — requiring SBOM in contracts
-
-**SBOM minimum data fields (NTIA):**
-- Supplier name, component name, version, unique identifiers, dependencies, author, timestamp
-
-### Supplier Assessment (SR-6)
-
-For critical suppliers:
-- Annual assessments via questionnaire, audit, or site visit
-- Review certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, FedRAMP)
-- Contractual security requirements (SA-4, SA-9)
-- Incident notification agreements (SR-8)
+# NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 — Baselines, Tailoring, and Overlays Reference
+
+## SP 800-53B — Control Baselines
+
+SP 800-53B (October 2020) is the companion publication that separates the control baselines from the main SP 800-53 catalog.
+
+### Low Impact Baseline
+
+**Used for:** Systems where the loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability would have limited adverse effects.
+
+**Examples:** Public-facing websites, internal collaboration tools with non-sensitive data, reference databases.
+
+**Approximate scope:** ~156 controls and enhancements across 20 families (not counting PM family).
+
+**Key characteristics:**
+- Policy and procedure controls required for every family
+- Basic access controls (AC-2 account management, AC-3 enforcement, AC-7 logon limits)
+- Fundamental audit logging (AU-2 through AU-12)
+- MFA required for privileged accounts (IA-2(1)) — extended post-EO 14028
+- Basic boundary protection (SC-7) without detailed enhancement requirements
+- Incident response plan (IR-8), incident reporting (IR-6)
+- Vulnerability scanning (RA-5) — frequency defined by ODV
+
+### Moderate Impact Baseline
+
+**Used for:** Systems where a security breach could have serious adverse effects on organizational operations, assets, or individuals.
+
+**Examples:** HR systems with PII, financial management systems, internal collaboration with sensitive data, most federal agency systems.
+
+**Approximate scope:** ~323 controls and enhancements across 20 families.
+
+**Key additions over Low:**
+- Automated account management (AC-2(1)), inactivity controls (AC-2(3)(5))
+- Information flow enforcement (AC-4), separation of duties (AC-5)
+- Least privilege requirements (AC-6 through AC-6(10))
+- SIEM integration for audit (AU-6(1))
+- Independent assessors (CA-2(1))
+- Continuous monitoring with defined frequencies (CA-7)
+- Configuration change control (CM-3), baseline automation (CM-2(2))
+- Alternate storage and processing sites (CP-6, CP-7)
+- Device and non-org user authentication (IA-3, IA-8)
+- PKI/PIV support (IA-2(12), IA-5(2))
+- Incident response testing (IR-3)
+- Developer security testing (SA-11), configuration management (SA-10)
+- Transmission protection (SC-8(1) — TLS required)
+- Encryption at rest (SC-28(1))
+- Software integrity verification (SI-7(1))
+- Supply chain plan and controls (SR-2, SR-3, SR-5 through SR-8, SR-11, SR-12)
+
+### High Impact Baseline
+
+**Used for:** Systems where a breach could have severe or catastrophic effects on national security, safety of human life, or major financial damage.
+
+**Examples:** National security systems, financial systems holding critical data, emergency services, election systems.
+
+**Approximate scope:** ~422 controls and enhancements across 20 families.
+
+**Key additions over Moderate:**
+- Account monitoring for atypical usage (AC-2(12))
+- Penetration testing (CA-8)
+- Insider threat program integration (AT-2(2) at org level; PM-12)
+- Threat hunting (RA-10)
+- Non-repudiation (AU-10)
+- Session audit (AU-14)
+- Supply chain team, tamper resistance, counterfeit prevention (SR-2(1), SR-6(1), SR-9 through SR-11(1))
+- Developer architecture review (SA-17)
+- All SI family controls including function verification (SI-6)
+- Enhanced cryptographic protections
+
+---
+
+## Control Baselines by Family — Quick Reference
+
+| Family | L Controls | M Controls | H Controls |
+|--------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
+| AC | 8 | 18 | 20 |
+| AT | 4 | 5 | 6 |
+| AU | 10 | 14 | 15 |
+| CA | 6 | 8 | 9 |
+| CM | 8 | 14 | 14 |
+| CP | 7 | 12 | 13 |
+| IA | 8 | 12 | 14 |
+| IR | 7 | 9 | 10 |
+| MA | 3 | 6 | 6 |
+| MP | 3 | 6 | 7 |
+| PE | 11 | 15 | 18 |
+| PL | 4 | 6 | 7 |
+| PS | 8 | 9 | 9 |
+| PT | varies | varies | varies |
+| RA | 5 | 8 | 9 |
+| SA | 7 | 16 | 17 |
+| SC | 14 | 24 | 29 |
+| SI | 9 | 17 | 19 |
+| SR | 1 | 9 | 12 |
+| PM | org-wide | org-wide | org-wide |
+
+---
+
+## Tailoring Process (SP 800-53B Section 2)
+
+Tailoring produces a system-specific set of controls from the starting baseline. Document all tailoring decisions in the SSP.
+
+### Tailoring Step 1 — Identify Common Controls
+
+**Common controls** (also called "inherited controls") are implemented at the organization or facility level and inherited by multiple systems:
+
+| Example | Control | Implemented By |
+|---------|---------|---------------|
+| Enterprise firewall | SC-7 | Network Operations |
+| Badge access system | PE-3 | Facilities |
+| Enterprise AV solution | SI-3 | IT Security |
+| Security awareness training | AT-2 | ISSO / HR |
+| Physical data center security | PE-2, PE-13 | Data Center Ops |
+
+**Designation types:**
+- **Common:** Fully inherited from another system/organization
+- **System-specific:** Implemented entirely by the system
+- **Hybrid:** Partially inherited, partially system-specific
+
+Document in SSP Section: Common Control Inheritance table.
+
+### Tailoring Step 2 — Apply Scoping Considerations
+
+Remove controls that are not applicable based on:
+
+| Scoping Consideration | Example |
+|----------------------|---------|
+| Technology not present | MA-4 (remote maintenance) if system has no remote maintenance capability |
+| Physical location | PE-3 not applicable for cloud-hosted system (inherited from CSP) |
+| Mission/operational need | AC-18 (wireless) not applicable for air-gapped system |
+| Applicable laws/regulations | Some PT controls not applicable if no PII processed |
+
+**Document every scoping decision** in the SSP with rationale. Regulators and auditors will scrutinize unjustified scoping.
+
+### Tailoring Step 3 — Organization-Defined Values (ODVs)
+
+Every control with brackets `[Assignment: ...]` requires an ODV. Failure to fill in ODVs is a common SSP finding.
+
+**High-priority ODVs to define:**
+
+| Control | Parameter | Federal Guidance | Example Value |
+|---------|-----------|-----------------|---------------|
+| AC-2(3) | Inactivity period before disable | OMB M-22-09: 90 days | 90 days |
+| AC-7 | Max login attempts before lockout | NIST guidance: 3–5 | 3 attempts |
+| AC-11 | Session inactivity before lock | OMB M-22-09: 15 minutes | 15 minutes |
+| AU-11 | Audit log retention | NARA/OMB: 3 years minimum | 3 years |
+| CA-7 | ConMon assessment frequency | FedRAMP: monthly/annually | Monthly for controls; annually for pen test |
+| IA-5(1)(a) | Minimum password length | NIST SP 800-63B: 8+; typical federal: 15+ | 15 characters |
+| IA-5(1)(h) | Password complexity | NIST SP 800-63B: no complexity requirements (memorized secrets) | No composition rules |
+| RA-5 | Vulnerability scan frequency | CISA BOD 19-02; FedRAMP: monthly OS, weekly DB | Monthly OS scans |
+| SI-2 | Patch critical vulns within | CISA BOD 19-02: 15 days Critical | 15 days critical; 30 days high |
+
+### Tailoring Step 4 — Compensating Controls
+
+A **compensating control** provides equivalent security when the baseline control cannot be implemented as written:
+
+**Requirements for compensating controls:**
+1. Must be as effective as the original control
+2. Must be documented with rationale
+3. Must not create additional risk
+4. Must be assessed as part of the authorization
+5. Must be reviewed at each authorization renewal
+
+**Example:** If a legacy system cannot implement IA-2(1) (MFA for privileged accounts), a compensating control could be: enhanced privileged access monitoring (AC-2(12)) + strict IP allowlisting + privileged access workstations + session recording.
+
+### Tailoring Step 5 — Supplementing the Baseline
+
+Add controls beyond the baseline when:
+- Risk assessment identifies elevated threats
+- Agency or system-specific security requirements demand it
+- Laws, regulations, or policies require additional protections
+- System processes highly sensitive data not reflected in impact level
+
+---
+
+## Overlays
+
+### What is an Overlay?
+
+An overlay is a pre-tailored baseline for a specific community of interest, technology type, or operating environment. Overlays save time and promote consistency — organizations apply the overlay instead of performing baseline tailoring from scratch.
+
+### FedRAMP Overlay
+
+**Scope:** Cloud services offered to federal agencies.
+
+Key FedRAMP additions to SP 800-53 Moderate baseline:
+- Specific ODV values (e.g., AU-11: 1 year; RA-5: monthly for all vulnerability types)
+- FedRAMP-specific controls (e.g., FedRAMP-specific ConMon requirements)
+- Required 3PAO (Third Party Assessment Organization) for independent assessment
+- Continuous monitoring reporting: monthly vulnerability reports, annual pen test, POA&M updates
+- JAB (Joint Authorization Board) authorization for P-ATO vs. Agency ATO path
+
+### DoD/CNSS Overlay (CNSS Instruction 1253)
+
+**Scope:** National Security Systems (NSS) — classified or intelligence systems.
+
+Key additions:
+- Higher baseline requirements for NSS systems
+- CNSS-specific control parameters
+- Applies to systems handling Classified National Security Information (CNSI)
+- Coordination with Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 503
+
+### Privacy Overlay
+
+**Scope:** Systems processing PII at scale.
+
+- All 8 PT family controls required
+- Enhanced PM privacy controls (PM-18 through PM-27)
+- Privacy Impact Assessments (PTA/PIA) required
+- SORN required for Privacy Act systems
+- Data minimization and retention requirements
+
+### ICS/SCADA Overlay
+
+**Scope:** Industrial Control Systems, SCADA, Operational Technology.
+
+Reference: **NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3** — Guide to OT Security.
+- Availability prioritized over confidentiality
+- Real-time processing constraints affect control applicability
+- Legacy system accommodations
+- Safety system isolation requirements
+- Physical process monitoring integration
+
+---
+
+## Privacy Baseline (PT Family) — Detailed
+
+### Privacy Act Connection
+
+The **Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a)** applies to federal agencies' systems of records (SOR). SP 800-53 PT controls implement Privacy Act requirements:
+
+| PT Control | Privacy Act Requirement |
+|-----------|------------------------|
+| PT-5 | Privacy Act notice at collection |
+| PT-6 | System of Records Notice (SORN) published in Federal Register |
+| PT-8 | Computer matching agreements |
+
+### Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)
+
+Required by the **E-Government Act of 2002** for new or substantially modified IT systems collecting PII:
+- Document what PII is collected and why
+- How PII is used, secured, and shared
+- Access controls and retention
+- Published on agency website (unless classified)
+
+Related controls: PL-2 (SSP includes privacy requirements), RA-3 (privacy risk assessment).
+
+---
+
+## Supply Chain Risk Management (SR Family) — Details
+
+### SCRM Plan (SR-2)
+
+Document organization's SCRM approach:
+- Component criticality (SR-4 provenance)
+- Supplier risk criteria and assessment process (SR-6)
+- Acquisition requirements (SR-5)
+- Component authenticity verification (SR-11)
+- Notification agreements with suppliers (SR-8)
+
+### SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
+
+EO 14028 and CISA requirements have increased SBOM expectations. SBOMs support:
+- SR-4 (Provenance) — knowing where software components came from
+- SR-11 (Component Authenticity) — verifying software integrity
+- SA-4 (Acquisition) — requiring SBOM in contracts
+
+**SBOM minimum data fields (NTIA):**
+- Supplier name, component name, version, unique identifiers, dependencies, author, timestamp
+
+### Supplier Assessment (SR-6)
+
+For critical suppliers:
+- Annual assessments via questionnaire, audit, or site visit
+- Review certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, FedRAMP)
+- Contractual security requirements (SA-4, SA-9)
+- Incident notification agreements (SR-8)