@monoes/monomindcli 2.15.3 → 2.15.4

package/org-skills/systematic-debugging/defense-in-depth.md

@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+# Defense-in-Depth Validation
+
+## Overview
+
+When you fix a bug caused by invalid data, adding validation at one place feels sufficient. But that single check can be bypassed by different code paths, refactoring, or mocks.
+
+**Core principle:** Validate at EVERY layer data passes through. Make the bug structurally impossible.
+
+## Why Multiple Layers
+
+Single validation: "We fixed the bug"
+Multiple layers: "We made the bug impossible"
+
+Different layers catch different cases:
+- Entry validation catches most bugs
+- Business logic catches edge cases
+- Environment guards prevent context-specific dangers
+- Debug logging helps when other layers fail
+
+## The Four Layers
+
+### Layer 1: Entry Point Validation
+**Purpose:** Reject obviously invalid input at API boundary
+
+```typescript
+function createProject(name: string, workingDirectory: string) {
+  if (!workingDirectory || workingDirectory.trim() === '') {
+    throw new Error('workingDirectory cannot be empty');
+  }
+  if (!existsSync(workingDirectory)) {
+    throw new Error(`workingDirectory does not exist: ${workingDirectory}`);
+  }
+  if (!statSync(workingDirectory).isDirectory()) {
+    throw new Error(`workingDirectory is not a directory: ${workingDirectory}`);
+  }
+  // ... proceed
+}
+```
+
+### Layer 2: Business Logic Validation
+**Purpose:** Ensure data makes sense for this operation
+
+```typescript
+function initializeWorkspace(projectDir: string, sessionId: string) {
+  if (!projectDir) {
+    throw new Error('projectDir required for workspace initialization');
+  }
+  // ... proceed
+}
+```
+
+### Layer 3: Environment Guards
+**Purpose:** Prevent dangerous operations in specific contexts
+
+```typescript
+async function gitInit(directory: string) {
+  // In tests, refuse git init outside temp directories
+  if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test') {
+    const normalized = normalize(resolve(directory));
+    const tmpDir = normalize(resolve(tmpdir()));
+
+    if (!normalized.startsWith(tmpDir)) {
+      throw new Error(
+        `Refusing git init outside temp dir during tests: ${directory}`
+      );
+    }
+  }
+  // ... proceed
+}
+```
+
+### Layer 4: Debug Instrumentation
+**Purpose:** Capture context for forensics
+
+```typescript
+async function gitInit(directory: string) {
+  const stack = new Error().stack;
+  logger.debug('About to git init', {
+    directory,
+    cwd: process.cwd(),
+    stack,
+  });
+  // ... proceed
+}
+```
+
+## Applying the Pattern
+
+When you find a bug:
+
+1. **Trace the data flow** - Where does bad value originate? Where used?
+2. **Map all checkpoints** - List every point data passes through
+3. **Add validation at each layer** - Entry, business, environment, debug
+4. **Test each layer** - Try to bypass layer 1, verify layer 2 catches it
+
+## Example from Session
+
+Bug: Empty `projectDir` caused `git init` in source code
+
+**Data flow:**
+1. Test setup → empty string
+2. `Project.create(name, '')`
+3. `WorkspaceManager.createWorkspace('')`
+4. `git init` runs in `process.cwd()`
+
+**Four layers added:**
+- Layer 1: `Project.create()` validates not empty/exists/writable
+- Layer 2: `WorkspaceManager` validates projectDir not empty
+- Layer 3: `WorktreeManager` refuses git init outside tmpdir in tests
+- Layer 4: Stack trace logging before git init
+
+**Result:** All 1847 tests passed, bug impossible to reproduce
+
+## Key Insight
+
+All four layers were necessary. During testing, each layer caught bugs the others missed:
+- Different code paths bypassed entry validation
+- Mocks bypassed business logic checks
+- Edge cases on different platforms needed environment guards
+- Debug logging identified structural misuse
+
+**Don't stop at one validation point.** Add checks at every layer.

package/org-skills/systematic-debugging/root-cause-tracing.md

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+# Root Cause Tracing
+
+## Overview
+
+Bugs often manifest deep in the call stack (git init in wrong directory, file created in wrong location, database opened with wrong path). Your instinct is to fix where the error appears, but that's treating a symptom.
+
+**Core principle:** Trace backward through the call chain until you find the original trigger, then fix at the source.
+
+## When to Use
+
+```dot
+digraph when_to_use {
+    "Bug appears deep in stack?" [shape=diamond];
+    "Can trace backwards?" [shape=diamond];
+    "Fix at symptom point" [shape=box];
+    "Trace to original trigger" [shape=box];
+    "BETTER: Also add defense-in-depth" [shape=box];
+
+    "Bug appears deep in stack?" -> "Can trace backwards?" [label="yes"];
+    "Can trace backwards?" -> "Trace to original trigger" [label="yes"];
+    "Can trace backwards?" -> "Fix at symptom point" [label="no - dead end"];
+    "Trace to original trigger" -> "BETTER: Also add defense-in-depth";
+}
+```
+
+**Use when:**
+- Error happens deep in execution (not at entry point)
+- Stack trace shows long call chain
+- Unclear where invalid data originated
+- Need to find which test/code triggers the problem
+
+## The Tracing Process
+
+### 1. Observe the Symptom
+```
+Error: git init failed in ~/project/packages/core
+```
+
+### 2. Find Immediate Cause
+**What code directly causes this?**
+```typescript
+await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], { cwd: projectDir });
+```
+
+### 3. Ask: What Called This?
+```typescript
+WorktreeManager.createSessionWorktree(projectDir, sessionId)
+  → called by Session.initializeWorkspace()
+  → called by Session.create()
+  → called by test at Project.create()
+```
+
+### 4. Keep Tracing Up
+**What value was passed?**
+- `projectDir = ''` (empty string!)
+- Empty string as `cwd` resolves to `process.cwd()`
+- That's the source code directory!
+
+### 5. Find Original Trigger
+**Where did empty string come from?**
+```typescript
+const context = setupCoreTest(); // Returns { tempDir: '' }
+Project.create('name', context.tempDir); // Accessed before beforeEach!
+```
+
+## Adding Stack Traces
+
+When you can't trace manually, add instrumentation:
+
+```typescript
+// Before the problematic operation
+async function gitInit(directory: string) {
+  const stack = new Error().stack;
+  console.error('DEBUG git init:', {
+    directory,
+    cwd: process.cwd(),
+    nodeEnv: process.env.NODE_ENV,
+    stack,
+  });
+
+  await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], { cwd: directory });
+}
+```
+
+**Critical:** Use `console.error()` in tests (not logger - may not show)
+
+**Run and capture:**
+```bash
+npm test 2>&1 | grep 'DEBUG git init'
+```
+
+**Analyze stack traces:**
+- Look for test file names
+- Find the line number triggering the call
+- Identify the pattern (same test? same parameter?)
+
+## Finding Which Test Causes Pollution
+
+If something appears during tests but you don't know which test:
+
+Use the bisection script `find-polluter.sh` in this directory:
+
+```bash
+bash ./find-polluter.sh '.git' 'src/**/*.test.ts'
+```
+
+Runs tests one-by-one, stops at first polluter. See script for usage.
+
+## Real Example: Empty projectDir
+
+**Symptom:** `.git` created in `packages/core/` (source code)
+
+**Trace chain:**
+1. `git init` runs in `process.cwd()` ← empty cwd parameter
+2. WorktreeManager called with empty projectDir
+3. Session.create() passed empty string
+4. Test accessed `context.tempDir` before beforeEach
+5. setupCoreTest() returns `{ tempDir: '' }` initially
+
+**Root cause:** Top-level variable initialization accessing empty value
+
+**Fix:** Made tempDir a getter that throws if accessed before beforeEach
+
+**Also added defense-in-depth:**
+- Layer 1: Project.create() validates directory
+- Layer 2: WorkspaceManager validates not empty
+- Layer 3: NODE_ENV guard refuses git init outside tmpdir
+- Layer 4: Stack trace logging before git init
+
+## Key Principle
+
+```dot
+digraph principle {
+    "Found immediate cause" [shape=ellipse];
+    "Can trace one level up?" [shape=diamond];
+    "Trace backwards" [shape=box];
+    "Is this the source?" [shape=diamond];
+    "Fix at source" [shape=box];
+    "Add validation at each layer" [shape=box];
+    "Bug impossible" [shape=doublecircle];
+    "NEVER fix just the symptom" [shape=octagon, style=filled, fillcolor=red, fontcolor=white];
+
+    "Found immediate cause" -> "Can trace one level up?";
+    "Can trace one level up?" -> "Trace backwards" [label="yes"];
+    "Can trace one level up?" -> "NEVER fix just the symptom" [label="no"];
+    "Trace backwards" -> "Is this the source?";
+    "Is this the source?" -> "Trace backwards" [label="no - keeps going"];
+    "Is this the source?" -> "Fix at source" [label="yes"];
+    "Fix at source" -> "Add validation at each layer";
+    "Add validation at each layer" -> "Bug impossible";
+}
+```
+
+**NEVER fix just where the error appears.** Trace back to find the original trigger.
+
+## Stack Trace Tips
+
+**In tests:** Use `console.error()` not logger - logger may be suppressed
+**Before operation:** Log before the dangerous operation, not after it fails
+**Include context:** Directory, cwd, environment variables, timestamps
+**Capture stack:** `new Error().stack` shows complete call chain
+
+## Real-World Impact
+
+From debugging session (2025-10-03):
+- Found root cause through 5-level trace
+- Fixed at source (getter validation)
+- Added 4 layers of defense
+- 1847 tests passed, zero pollution

package/{dist/src/orgrt/role-skills/task-orchestrator.md → org-skills/task-orchestrator/SKILL.md}

@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+---
+name: task-orchestrator
+description: "Task Orchestrator role best practices. Coordinates multi-step, multi-agent work end-to-end — sequencing phases, handing off context between specialists, enforcing quality gates, and deciding when to retry, escalate, or advance."
+tags: ["engineering"]
+tools: ["monograph_query","monograph_context","monograph_impact"]
+license: Apache-2.0
+source: https://github.com/monoes/monomind
+---
 # Task Orchestrator — Best Practices
 
 ## Focus

package/org-skills/team-communications/LICENSE.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+MIT License
+
+Copyright (c) 2025 Alireza Rezvani
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.

package/org-skills/team-communications/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+---
+name: team-communications
+description: "Write internal company communications — 3P updates (Progress/Plans/Problems), company-wide newsletters, FAQ roundups, incident reports, leadership updates, status reports, project updates, and general internal comms. Use this skill any time the user asks to draft, edit, or format something meant for internal audiences."
+tags: ["writing","operations"]
+tools: []
+license: MIT
+source: https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills
+source_path: "project-management/skills/team-communications"
+source_commit: 19392f7a08264ed00486a251f5b2098321771f94
+---
+# Internal Comms
+
+> Originally contributed by [maximcoding](https://github.com/maximcoding) — enhanced and integrated by the claude-skills team.
+
+Write polished internal communications by loading the right reference file, gathering context, and outputting in the company's exact format.
+
+## Routing
+
+Identify the communication type from the user's request, then read the matching reference file before writing anything:
+
+| Type | Trigger phrases | Reference file |
+|---|---|---|
+| **3P Update** | "3P", "progress plans problems", "weekly team update", "what did we ship" | `references/3p-updates.md` |
+| **Newsletter** | "newsletter", "company update", "weekly/monthly roundup", "all-hands summary" | `references/company-newsletter.md` |
+| **FAQ** | "FAQ", "common questions", "what people are asking", "confusion around" | `references/faq-answers.md` |
+| **General** | anything internal that doesn't match above | `references/general-comms.md` |
+
+If the type is ambiguous, ask one clarifying question — don't guess.
+
+## Workflow
+
+1. **Read the reference file** for the matched type. Follow its formatting exactly.
+2. **Gather inputs.** Use available MCP tools (Slack, Gmail, Google Drive, Calendar) to pull real data. If no tools are connected, ask the user to provide bullet points or raw context.
+3. **Clarify scope.** Confirm: team name (for 3Ps), time period, audience, and any specific items the user wants included or excluded.
+4. **Draft.** Follow the format, tone, and length constraints from the reference file precisely. Do not invent a new format.
+5. **Present the draft** and ask if anything needs to be added, removed, or reworded.
+
+## Tone & Style (applies to all types)
+
+- Use "we" — you are part of the company.
+- Active voice, present tense for progress, future tense for plans.
+- Concise. Every sentence should carry information. Cut filler.
+- Include metrics and links wherever possible.
+- Professional but approachable — not corporate-speak.
+- Put the most important information first.
+
+## When tools are unavailable
+
+If the user hasn't connected Slack, Gmail, Drive, or Calendar, don't stall. Ask them to paste or describe what they want covered. You're formatting and sharpening — that's still valuable. Mention which tools would improve future drafts so they can connect them later.
+
+---
+
+## Anti-Patterns
+
+| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Better Approach |
+|---|---|---|
+| Writing updates without reading the reference template first | Output won't match company format — user has to reformat | Always load the matching reference file before drafting |
+| Inventing metrics or accomplishments | Internal comms must be factual — fabrication destroys trust | Only include data the user provided or MCP tools retrieved |
+| Using passive voice for accomplishments | "The feature was shipped" hides who did the work | "Team X shipped the feature" — active voice credits the team |
+| Writing walls of text for status updates | Leadership scans, doesn't read — key info gets buried | Lead with the headline, follow with 3-5 bullet points |
+| Sending without confirming audience | A team update reads differently from a company-wide newsletter | Always confirm: who will read this? |
+
+---
+
+## Related Skills
+
+| Skill | Relationship |
+|-------|-------------|
+| `project-management/senior-pm` | Broader PM scope — status reports feed into PM reporting |
+| `project-management/meeting-analyzer` | Meeting insights can feed into 3P updates and status reports |
+| `project-management/confluence-expert` | Publish comms as Confluence pages for permanent record |
+| `marketing-skill/content-production` | External comms — use for public-facing content, not internal |

package/org-skills/team-communications/references/3p-updates.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+## Instructions
+You are being asked to write a 3P update. 3P updates stand for "Progress, Plans, Problems." The main audience is for executives, leadership, other teammates, etc. They're meant to be very succinct and to-the-point: think something you can read in 30-60sec or less. They're also for people with some, but not a lot of context on what the team does.
+
+3Ps can cover a team of any size, ranging all the way up to the entire company. The bigger the team, the less granular the tasks should be. For example, "mobile team" might have "shipped feature" or "fixed bugs," whereas the company might have really meaty 3Ps, like "hired 20 new people" or "closed 10 new deals." 
+
+They represent the work of the team across a time period, almost always one week. They include three sections:
+1) Progress: what the team has accomplished over the next time period. Focus mainly on things shipped, milestones achieved, tasks created, etc.
+2) Plans: what the team plans to do over the next time period. Focus on what things are top-of-mind, really high priority, etc. for the team.
+3) Problems: anything that is slowing the team down. This could be things like too few people, bugs or blockers that are preventing the team from moving forward, some deal that fell through, etc.
+
+Before writing them, make sure that you know the team name. If it's not specified, you can ask explicitly what the team name you're writing for is.
+
+
+## Tools Available
+Whenever possible, try to pull from available sources to get the information you need:
+- Slack: posts from team members with their updates - ideally look for posts in large channels with lots of reactions
+- Google Drive: docs written from critical team members with lots of views
+- Email: emails with lots of responses of lots of content that seems relevant
+- Calendar: non-recurring meetings that have a lot of importance, like product reviews, etc.
+
+
+Try to gather as much context as you can, focusing on the things that covered the time period you're writing for:
+- Progress: anything between a week ago and today
+- Plans: anything from today to the next week
+- Problems: anything between a week ago and today
+
+
+If you don't have access, you can ask the user for things they want to cover. They might also include these things to you directly, in which case you're mostly just formatting for this particular format.
+
+## Workflow
+
+1. **Clarify scope**: Confirm the team name and time period (usually past week for Progress/Problems, next
+week for Plans)
+2. **Gather information**: Use available tools or ask the user directly
+3. **Draft the update**: Follow the strict formatting guidelines
+4. **Review**: Ensure it's concise (30-60 seconds to read) and data-driven
+
+## Formatting
+
+The format is always the same, very strict formatting. Never use any formatting other than this. Pick an emoji that is fun and captures the vibe of the team and update.
+
+[pick an emoji] [Team Name] (Dates Covered, usually a week)
+Progress: [1-3 sentences of content]
+Plans: [1-3 sentences of content]
+Problems: [1-3 sentences of content]
+
+Each section should be no more than 1-3 sentences: clear, to the point. It should be data-driven, and generally include metrics where possible. The tone should be very matter-of-fact, not super prose-heavy.

package/org-skills/team-communications/references/company-newsletter.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+## Instructions
+You are being asked to write a company-wide newsletter update. You are meant to summarize the past week/month of a company in the form of a newsletter that the entire company will read. It should be maybe ~20-25 bullet points long. It will be sent via Slack and email, so make it consumable for that.
+
+Ideally it includes the following attributes:
+- Lots of links: pulling documents from Google Drive that are very relevant, linking to prominent Slack messages in announce channels and from executives, perhgaps referencing emails that went company-wide, highlighting significant things that have happened in the company.
+- Short and to-the-point: each bullet should probably be no longer than ~1-2 sentences
+- Use the "we" tense, as you are part of the company. Many of the bullets should say "we did this" or "we did that"
+
+## Tools to use
+If you have access to the following tools, please try to use them. If not, you can also let the user know directly that their responses would be better if they gave them access.
+
+- Slack: look for messages in channels with lots of people, with lots of reactions or lots of responses within the thread
+- Email: look for things from executives that discuss company-wide announcements
+- Calendar: if there were meetings with large attendee lists, particularly things like All-Hands meetings, big company announcements, etc. If there were documents attached to those meetings, those are great links to include.
+- Documents: if there were new docs published in the last week or two that got a lot of attention, you can link them. These should be things like company-wide vision docs, plans for the upcoming quarter or half, things authored by critical executives, etc.
+- External press: if you see references to articles or press we've received over the past week, that could be really cool too.
+
+If you don't have access to any of these things, you can ask the user for things they want to cover. In this case, you'll mostly just be polishing up and fitting to this format more directly.
+
+## Sections
+The company is pretty big: 1000+ people. There are a variety of different teams and initiatives going on across the company. To make sure the update works well, try breaking it into sections of similar things. You might break into clusters like {product development, go to market, finance} or {recruiting, execution, vision}, or {external news, internal news} etc. Try to make sure the different areas of the company are highlighted well.
+
+## Prioritization
+Focus on:
+- Company-wide impact (not team-specific details)
+- Announcements from leadership
+- Major milestones and achievements
+- Information that affects most employees
+- External recognition or press
+
+Avoid:
+- Overly granular team updates (save those for 3Ps)
+- Information only relevant to small groups
+- Duplicate information already communicated
+
+## Example Formats
+
+:megaphone: Company Announcements
+- Announcement 1
+- Announcement 2
+- Announcement 3
+
+:dart: Progress on Priorities
+- Area 1
+    - Sub-area 1
+    - Sub-area 2
+    - Sub-area 3
+- Area 2
+    - Sub-area 1
+    - Sub-area 2
+    - Sub-area 3
+- Area 3
+    - Sub-area 1
+    - Sub-area 2
+    - Sub-area 3
+
+:pillar: Leadership Updates
+- Post 1
+- Post 2
+- Post 3
+
+:thread: Social Updates
+- Update 1
+- Update 2
+- Update 3

package/org-skills/team-communications/references/faq-answers.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+## Instructions
+You are an assistant for answering questions that are being asked across the company. Every week, there are lots of questions that get asked across the company, and your goal is to try to summarize what those questions are. We want our company to be well-informed and on the same page, so your job is to produce a set of frequently asked questions that our employees are asking and attempt to answer them. Your singular job is to do two things:
+
+- Find questions that are big sources of confusion for lots of employees at the company, generally about things that affect a large portion of the employee base
+- Attempt to give a nice summarized answer to that question in order to minimize confusion.
+
+Some examples of areas that may be interesting to folks: recent corporate events (fundraising, new executives, etc.), upcoming launches, hiring progress, changes to vision or focus, etc.
+
+
+## Tools Available
+You should use the company's available tools, where communication and work happens. For most companies, it looks something like this:
+- Slack: questions being asked across the company - it could be questions in response to posts with lots of responses, questions being asked with lots of reactions or thumbs up to show support, or anything else to show that a large number of employees want to ask the same things
+- Email: emails with FAQs written directly in them can be a good source as well
+- Documents: docs in places like Google Drive, linked on calendar events, etc. can also be a good source of FAQs, either directly added or inferred based on the contents of the doc
+
+## Formatting
+The formatting should be pretty basic:
+
+- *Question*: [insert question - 1 sentence]
+- *Answer*: [insert answer - 1-2 sentence]
+
+## Guidance
+Make sure you're being holistic in your questions. Don't focus too much on just the user in question or the team they are a part of, but try to capture the entire company. Try to be as holistic as you can in reading all the tools available, producing responses that are relevant to all at the company.
+
+## Answer Guidelines
+- Base answers on official company communications when possible
+- If information is uncertain, indicate that clearly
+- Link to authoritative sources (docs, announcements, emails)
+- Keep tone professional but approachable
+- Flag if a question requires executive input or official response

package/org-skills/team-communications/references/general-comms.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+  ## Instructions
+  You are being asked to write internal company communication that doesn't fit into the standard formats (3P
+  updates, newsletters, or FAQs).
+
+  Before proceeding:
+  1. Ask the user about their target audience
+  2. Understand the communication's purpose
+  3. Clarify the desired tone (formal, casual, urgent, informational)
+  4. Confirm any specific formatting requirements
+
+  Use these general principles:
+  - Be clear and concise
+  - Use active voice
+  - Put the most important information first
+  - Include relevant links and references
+  - Match the company's communication style

package/org-skills/team-composition-analysis/LICENSE.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+MIT License
+
+Copyright (c) 2024 Seth Hobson
+
+Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
+of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
+in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
+to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
+copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
+furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
+
+The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
+copies or substantial portions of the Software.
+
+THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
+AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
+LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
+OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
+SOFTWARE.