@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.0

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-restaurant-homepage.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1261,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Make sure the code you provide is executable and demonstrable. Please design a homepage for a restaurant WeChat mini-program.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core mini-program structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the basic structure of a WeChat mini-program with proper file organization (app.js, app.json, app.wxss, and page files). Check if page registration follows the standard mini-program pattern and if global configurations are correctly set. Score 0 if the basic structure is missing, 5 if only partial structure is implemented, and 10 if the complete mini-program architecture is properly configured.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the restaurant homepage include all essential UI components?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the code includes all necessary restaurant homepage components: header with logo, food category navigation, featured dish carousel, promotion banners, restaurant information section (hours, location, contact), and a bottom navigation bar. Each missing essential component deducts 2 points. The implementation should follow WeChat mini-program standards using <view>, <image>, <text> and other native components correctly. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the mini-program navigation system properly designed?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code implements a proper navigation system including tab bar configuration in app.json, internal page navigation using navigator components, and proper event handling for user interactions. Deduct 3 points if tab bar is missing, 3 points if page navigation functions are incomplete, and 4 points if the navigation doesn't follow WeChat mini-program best practices. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the code appropriately handle data binding and state management?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the implementation uses WeChat mini-program's data binding features correctly (Page data object, setData method), includes proper lifecycle methods (onLoad, onShow), and implements clean state management for dynamic content like dish listings, promotions, or order status. Deduct 5 points for improper data binding, 3 points for missing essential lifecycle methods, and 2 points for inefficient state management. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network failure when loading restaurant data, image loading errors, unexpected user inputs, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or fallback mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should include try-catch blocks, conditional rendering for loading states, and proper error handling. Give 10 points for comprehensive error handling, 5 points for basic handling, and 0 points if no error handling exists.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the restaurant experience (e.g., 1. Animated dish recommendations 2. Integrated table reservation system 3. Interactive menu with ingredient highlighting 4. Loyalty points visualization). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to access the same menu) 2. Function modules unrelated to restaurant experience (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down the interface). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review component reusability (such as creating custom components for menu items, section headers), proper file organization, consistent naming conventions, and appropriate commenting. Deduct 3 points if global variable pollution is found; deduct 3 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 4 points if the component structure is chaotic or non-existent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat mini-program design principles: 1) Consistent with WeChat visual language 2) Proper layout spacing (following the 8px rule) 3) Appropriate typography hierarchy (at least 3 text sizes for different content importance) 4) Restaurant branding integration. Deduct 3 points for cluttered layouts, 3 points for inconsistent styling, 2 points for poor typography, and 2 points for weak brand integration. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the mobile interaction optimized for restaurant scenarios?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interactions are optimized for restaurant-specific user flows: 1) One-handed operation accessibility 2) Quick access to menu/ordering 3) Clear call-to-actions for reservations or delivery 4) Logical information hierarchy for decision making. Deduct 3 points for requiring two hands to operate key functions, 3 points for buried critical restaurant information, 2 points for confusing ordering process, and 2 points for poor touch target sizing (< 44px). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-shawls-fur-products.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1208,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. Create a WeChat Mini Program about shawls and fur products similar to the Dior WeChat Mini Program. I'm using the WeChat Developer Tools.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program registration and configuration properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code includes complete WeChat Mini Program registration in app.js, proper configuration in app.json (including pages array, window settings, tabBar if applicable), and correct project.config.json settings. Check if global styles are defined in app.wxss. Score 0 if core configuration files are missing, 5 if basic configuration is present but incomplete, and 10 if all required configurations are properly implemented with appropriate permissions for network requests.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the application implement a complete product showcase system?",
-      "description": "Check if the code includes comprehensive product display pages with proper information architecture (categories, collections, product details). Evaluate whether the product listings include high-quality image display with lazy loading, detailed product information (materials, dimensions, pricing), and multi-angle product viewing. Deduct 5 points if the product structure is illogical, 3 points if image optimization is missing, and 3 points if luxury product details (material origin, craftsmanship) are inadequate. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the shopping experience and cart functionality properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code implements a complete shopping journey including add-to-cart, cart management, checkout process, and order confirmation. Check for features like quantity adjustment, product removal, price calculation, and persistent cart storage. Review if product variants (colors, sizes) are handled correctly. Deduct 5 points if the cart doesn't persist between sessions, 3 points if variant selection is buggy, and 5 points if the checkout flow is incomplete. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the luxury brand visual identity and premium UX maintained throughout the Mini Program?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the code creates a premium experience similar to Dior with high-quality product imagery, brand-consistent typography, custom animations for transitions, and refined micro-interactions. Check if the implementation includes parallax scrolling, fade-in effects for product listings, and elegant loading states. Deduct 5 points for generic templates without brand customization, 3 points for missing luxury-level animations, and 5 points for poor visual hierarchy. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles common exceptions (network errors, empty states, loading states, permission denials, etc.) and provides appropriate feedback mechanisms. Check if there are fallbacks for failed image loading and retry mechanisms for API failures. Test edge cases like adding out-of-stock items or submitting incomplete forms. Code with strong robustness should handle these scenarios elegantly, giving 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no error handling exists, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the luxury shopping experience (e.g., 1. Virtual try-on for shawls using AR 2. Material texture visualization through 3D rendering 3. Personalized styling recommendations 4. Interactive product storytelling). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple product filtering systems coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to luxury fashion retail (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down browsing). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core shopping functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review the modular design (such as separating UI/business logic using MVVM pattern), component reusability, and code organization. Check if the code follows WeChat Mini Program best practices using proper Custom Components. Deduct 5 points if global state management is chaotic; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear separation between presentation and business logic. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional luxury brand design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows luxury design principles: 1) Refined color palette (primarily neutral colors with subtle accents) 2) Generous whitespace (minimum 16px margins, elegant typography with proper line height ≥1.6) 3) High-resolution imagery without pixelation 4) Subtle micro-animations that enhance perceived value. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for inappropriate color combinations, and 5 points for poor typography implementation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects provide a premium feel: 1) Immediate tap feedback (≤100ms) 2) Smooth scrolling without jank (60fps) 3) Elegant transitions between pages (300-500ms duration) 4) Tactile feedback aligned with luxury experience. Deduct 5 points for each laggy interaction, 3 points for abrupt transitions, and 5 points for non-intuitive navigation patterns. Check specifically for smooth image gallery swiping and elegant animation when adding products to cart. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-shopping-features.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1550,
-  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be careful to ensure that the generated code is executable when demonstrated. Well, let me explain my requirements: my WeChat Mini Program needs to have functionality for collecting coupons, payment capabilities, and the ability to view products. Can you help me write this kind of code? And could you tell me where to modify the relevant code?",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the coupon collection functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code includes a complete coupon system with collection, storage, and usage mechanisms. Check for 1) Coupon listings page, 2) Collection interaction, 3) Coupon detail view, 4) Storage in user account, and 5) Expiration management. Score 0 if core coupon functionality is missing, 5 if basic collection is implemented without management features, and 10 if the full coupon lifecycle is managed.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the payment capability properly integrated?",
-      "description": "Review the implementation of the WeChat payment API, including 1) Pre-payment order creation, 2) Payment signature verification, 3) Payment callback handling, 4) Order status management, and 5) Payment error handling. Ensure the code includes proper security measures like signature validation. Deduct 5 points if the payment flow is incomplete, 3 points if error handling is missing, and 5 points if security validations are absent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the product display functionality comprehensive?",
-      "description": "Check whether the product display includes 1) List and grid views, 2) Product detail pages with complete information (images, price, description, specifications), 3) Category filtering, 4) Search functionality, and 5) Product recommendation. Evaluate if the display adapts to different screen sizes. Deduct 2 points for each missing core feature and 5 points if responsive design is absent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the code follow WeChat Mini Program development standards?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code follows official WeChat Mini Program development patterns and best practices, including correct use of 1) Page lifecycle hooks, 2) Component system, 3) WXML/WXSS conventions, 4) App configuration, and 5) API usage. Deduct 3 points for each significant deviation from standards. Give 0 points if the code isn't specifically adapted for Mini Program environment, 5 points for basic compliance, and 10 points for full adherence to best practices.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors, payment failures, API timeout, invalid coupon usage, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AR product preview 2. Social sharing with custom cards 3. Gamified coupon collection 4. Smart product recommendations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple product listing methods) 2. Function modules unrelated to the core requirements (e.g., unnecessary social features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., complex animations on product pages). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating business logic/view/API layers), code organization patterns, and maintenance considerations. Deduct 5 points if global state management is chaotic; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear folder structure or naming convention. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat Mini Program design guidelines: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual language 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows Mini Program conventions) 3) Professional typography (readable font sizes, proper contrast). Deduct 3 points for each inconsistency with WeChat's design language, 5 points for cluttered layouts, and 5 points for poor readability. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to Mini Program user expectations: 1) Response to taps within 100ms 2) Smooth transitions between pages 3) Clear loading states for network operations 4) Intuitive gesture support. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for janky animations, and 5 points for confusing navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-store-orders.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1048,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. Write a program for placing orders at stores in a WeChat Mini Program.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program order placement system structure complete?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements the essential components of a WeChat Mini Program order system: pages for product listing, product details, shopping cart, order confirmation, and order history. Check for proper navigation flow between these components. Score 0 if core pages are missing, 5 if basic pages exist but lack proper connections, and 10 if the complete order flow is implemented with all necessary transitions.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the implementation integrate properly with WeChat Mini Program APIs?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code correctly uses WeChat-specific APIs like wx.request for network calls, wx.login for authentication, wx.payment for payment processing, and wx.getUserInfo for user profiles. Deduct 3 points if any critical WeChat API is missing, 5 points if APIs are used incorrectly, and 7 points if no WeChat-specific APIs are utilized at all. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the data persistence and state management properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes proper data storage using wx.setStorage/getStorage for local data, cloud database for remote persistence, and whether it handles synchronization between offline and online states. Evaluate if the shopping cart state persists across app restarts. Deduct 3 points if only local storage is used without cloud backup, 5 points if data can be lost during navigation, and 7 points if no persistence mechanism exists. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the payment flow securely and correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the payment process follows WeChat Pay security practices, including proper signature verification, order number generation, and completion handling. Check for payment status verification and receipt generation. Deduct 5 points if the payment flow lacks security measures, 3 points if receipt/confirmation is missing, and 7 points if the entire payment process is simulated without actual WeChat Pay integration. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors, payment failures, product out-of-stock, invalid inputs) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Voice-based product search 2. AR product preview 3. Social sharing with custom images 4. Smart recommendations based on previous orders). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to calculate the same total price) 2. Function modules unrelated to order placement (e.g., built-in games) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down the ordering process). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI components, business logic, and API services), component reusability, and code organization following WeChat Mini Program best practices. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or MVVM pattern is not followed; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if custom components are not created for reusable elements. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat design guidelines: 1) Consistent with WeChat visual language (proper use of colors, buttons, and form elements) 2) Proper layout spacing (following WeChat's component spacing principles) 3) Professional typography (following WeChat's font hierarchy). Deduct 3 points for each inconsistent visual element, 5 points for layouts that don't match WeChat standards, and 5 points for non-native looking components. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat Mini Program user experience: 1) Page transitions match WeChat's native feel 2) Loading states are properly indicated 3) Button and interaction feedback is immediate and clear. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jerky animations or transitions, and 5 points for interactions that feel non-native to the WeChat environment. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-selling-clothes-mini-program.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1025,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Help me write a WeChat Mini Program for selling clothes. Requirement: Make it similar to the popular milk tea ordering Mini Program \"Bawang Chaji\".",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the clothing e-commerce core functionality well implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements essential e-commerce features: product listing, category filtering, item detail pages, shopping cart, and checkout process. Score 0 if core shopping flow is absent, 5 if basic functionality exists but lacks refinement, and 10 if the implementation is complete with smooth transitions between screens.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the Mini Program implement a proper user authentication system?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code utilizes WeChat's authentication APIs correctly, includes user profile management, and securely handles user session. Deduct 5 points if login functionality is missing, 3 points if user profile management is incomplete, and 2 points if session handling is insecure. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the product customization functionality similar to 'Bawang Chaji' implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements clothing customization options (size selection, color variants, style options) similar to how 'Bawang Chaji' allows beverage customization. Deduct 5 points if customization is absent, 3 points if options cannot be combined, and 2 points if user selections aren't visually reflected. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the Mini Program implement proper state management and data synchronization?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code uses appropriate state management solutions (like Mobx, Redux patterns in WXML context), maintains consistency across pages, and properly synchronizes with backend services. Deduct 5 points for global state issues, 3 points for inconsistent data across pages, and 5 points if offline capability is missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles common edge cases (network failures, payment failures, item out-of-stock situations) and provides user-friendly error messages. Code with strong error handling should recover gracefully from errors, giving 10 points. If error handling is average, give 5 points, and if exceptions are unhandled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the shopping experience (e.g., 1. AR virtual try-on 2. Social sharing with discount incentives 3. Personalized outfit recommendations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Duplicate functionality across different pages 2. Features unrelated to clothing e-commerce (e.g., built-in games not tied to purchasing) 3. Excessive animations that affect performance on lower-end devices. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core shopping experience is compromised by bloat.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separation of UI components, business logic, and API services), component reusability, and WeChat Mini Program best practices. Deduct 5 points if global app instance is overused; deduct 5 points for excessive duplicate WXML/WXSS; deduct 5 points if file structure is chaotic or custom components are not properly utilized. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows WeChat Mini Program design principles: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual language 2) Proper use of white space (following 8px grid system) 3) Typography hierarchy (at least 3 distinct text styles for different content types). Deduct 3 points for each inconsistent UI element, 5 points for poor readability due to contrast issues, and 5 points for layouts that don't adapt to different device sizes. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether interactions follow WeChat Mini Program conventions: 1) Page transitions complete within 300ms 2) Skeleton screens during data loading 3) Appropriate haptic feedback for important actions. Deduct 5 points for each interaction without loading state, 3 points for jerky animations, and 5 points for confusing navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wholesale-retail-condiments-seasonings-product-showcase.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1320,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you provide is executable for demonstration. Create a small program for showcasing products for a store that sells wholesale and retail condiments and seasonings.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the product showcase system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements a product catalog system for condiments and seasonings, including product listings, categories, search functionality, and detailed product views. Score 0 if the core display logic is not implemented, 5 if only basic product listing is implemented, and 10 if the complete showcase with filtering and sorting options is fully included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the wholesale/retail price differentiation properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code handles both wholesale and retail pricing models, including quantity-based discounts, minimum order quantities for wholesale, price comparison features, and unit price calculations. Deduct 5 points if wholesale pricing logic is missing, and 3 points if quantity discounts are not handled. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the product data management system properly designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the product data structure is well-designed with proper attributes for condiments (such as ingredients, allergens, volume/weight, origin, expiration information, etc.). Check if data can be loaded from external sources and if the system supports CRUD operations. Deduct 5 points if the data model is overly simplistic, and 3 points if data validation is missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the shopping cart or order management functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes functionality for adding products to cart, managing quantities, calculating totals (with appropriate tax/shipping considerations for wholesale vs retail), and facilitating the checkout process. Deduct 5 points if cart persistence is not implemented, and 3 points if the quantity management for bulk orders is inadequate. Give 10 points if fully implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid input, out-of-stock items, pricing calculation edge cases, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Interactive product visualization 2. Flavor profile comparison tools 3. Recipe suggestions based on selected condiments). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple cart calculation methods) 2. Function modules unrelated to condiment/seasoning sales (e.g., an unrelated news feed) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations on product hover). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating product data/view/cart logic layers), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (appropriate for a food/culinary business with no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance for product selection and cart operations. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast scrolling through product lists, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons like 'add to cart' or 'checkout'. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-other/create-capsule-page-with-editor.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 303,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Now, start creating a capsule page according to your design concept:\n\nUse a step-by-step design, for example:\nInput title and description.\nUpload images or videos.\nSet opening time (supporting date and time picker).\nAdd tags (optional).\n\nRich text editor:\nSupport text formatting (bold, italic, underline, etc.).\nSupport inserting images, videos, emoticons, etc.\n\nAnimation effects:\nAdd a \"capsule sealed\" animation effect (such as capsule closing, time-lapse animation) after the user completes creation.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the step-by-step capsule creation design fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code correctly implements all required steps (title/description input, image/video upload, date/time picker for opening time, optional tags). Score 0 if the core steps are missing, 5 if basic functionality is implemented but lacks proper field validation, 10 if all steps are fully implemented with appropriate user guidance and input validation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the rich text editor implemented with all required features?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the editor includes text formatting (bold, italic, underline), media insertion capabilities (images, videos), and emoticon support. Check for proper toolbar implementation, keyboard shortcuts, and formatting preservation. Score 3 for basic text formatting only, 7 for formatting plus media support, and 10 for complete implementation including emoticons and proper state management.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the 'capsule sealed' animation effect properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the animation effect is triggered after user completes creation, provides visual feedback that enhances the capsule creation experience, and uses modern animation techniques (CSS animations, SVG animations, or JavaScript libraries like GSAP). Score 0 if animation is missing, 5 if basic animation exists but lacks polish, and 10 if animation is smooth, thematically appropriate, and enhances the user experience.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the media handling implementation robust and user-friendly?",
-      "description": "Verify if the code handles image/video uploads properly, including file type validation, size limits, preview functionality, progress indicators, and error handling. Check if the implementation supports multiple file formats and provides options for cropping/editing. Score 3 for basic upload, 7 for upload with previews and validation, 10 for complete media management with editing capabilities.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid inputs, network issues during upload, browser compatibility issues) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Preview of how the capsule will appear when opened 2. Social sharing integration 3. Customizable capsule themes/templates). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to insert the same type of media) 2. Function modules unrelated to the capsule creation (e.g., unrelated settings or features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down the interface). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI components, validation logic, and state management), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during step transitions, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Other",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-other/mini-program-self-service-car-washing.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1168,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable and demonstrable. How do I develop a mini-program for self-service car washing? Please provide detailed information, including the complete project deployment process and steps on the server. The backend uses PHP language with Hyperf framework, and the frontend uses Vue3 framework.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the car washing self-service mini-program frontend implementation complete?",
-      "description": "Review whether the Vue3 frontend code includes essential modules: user registration/login, car wash service selection, payment integration, booking/scheduling system, and service status tracking. Score 0 if core modules are missing, 5 if basic functionality exists but with limited features, and 10 if all essential user flows are fully implemented with proper state management (Pinia/Vuex).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the PHP Hyperf backend architecture properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the backend code properly implements Hyperf's coroutine-based architecture with appropriate middleware, controllers, services, and models. Check for RESTful API design patterns, proper dependency injection, and use of Hyperf's built-in features (async tasks, crontab, etc.). Deduct 5 points if missing proper authentication middleware, and 3 points if database models lack validation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the payment integration and transaction management system complete?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code implements secure payment gateway integration, transaction record keeping, refund capabilities, and receipt generation. The system should include payment state machine handling various scenarios (success, failure, timeout, partial payment). Deduct 5 points if security measures (like idempotency keys) are missing, 3 points if webhook handlers for payment callbacks are incomplete. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the hardware control system properly integrated with the software stack?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the application includes proper interfaces to control car washing hardware (water pumps, sensors, dispensers) through API calls, with appropriate error handling and status reporting. Check for device management dashboards and real-time monitoring features. Deduct 5 points if hardware status polling is missing, 3 points if offline operation mode is not implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as payment failures, network interruption, hardware malfunctions, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should include comprehensive try-catch blocks, input validation, and graceful degradation. Give 10 points if robust error handling exists throughout, 5 points if average, and 0 points if exceptions aren't handled.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AI-based car recognition to personalize services 2. Gamification elements to reward frequent users 3. Real-time consumption tracking with water/energy-saving tips). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple payment handling systems) 2. Function modules unrelated to car washing (e.g., news feed) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., heavy animations that slow down critical functions). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separation of concerns between frontend/backend, proper component structure in Vue), comprehensive test coverage (unit tests for both PHP and Vue components), and deployment automation (CI/CD pipeline, containerization with Docker). Deduct 5 points if global state management is chaotic; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if deployment process is manual. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the UI follows modern mobile design principles: 1) Consistent color scheme aligned with brand identity 2) Proper spacing and touch targets (minimum 44×44px for interactive elements) 3) Professional typography system with proper hierarchy. Deduct 3 points for each navigation issue that affects usability, 5 points for non-responsive design elements, and 5 points for poor information architecture. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the app interactions meet mobile user expectations: 1) Immediate feedback for user actions 2) Loading states for asynchronous operations 3) Smooth transitions between app states (500ms or less). Deduct 5 points for unresponsive UI during backend operations, 3 points for jarring transitions, and 5 points if critical functions (like payment confirmation) lack clear visual feedback. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Other",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}