@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.0

package/library/web_applications-communication/webrtc-sdp-exchange-example.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1349,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for demonstration.\n\n```\nconst sdpOffer = \"v=0\\r\\no=- 123456789 2 IN IP4 127.0.0.1\\r\\n...\"; // Generated SDP Offer\nconst base64Offer = btoa(sdpOffer); // Base64 encoding\n\nconst formData = new FormData();\nformData.append(\"data\", base64Offer);\n\nfetch(\"http://127.0.0.1:8083/stream/123/channel/1/webrtc\", {\n    method: \"POST\",\n    body: formData\n})\n.then(response => response.text())\n.then(base64Answer => {\n    const sdpAnswer = atob(base64Answer); // Base64 decoding\n    // Set the SDP Answer to RTCPeerConnection\n    peerConnection.setRemoteDescription(new RTCSessionDescription({ type: \"answer\", sdp: sdpAnswer }));\n});\n```\n\nCould you provide a complete HTML example?",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the WebRTC connection establishment process fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the complete WebRTC handshake flow including createOffer(), setLocalDescription(), setRemoteDescription(), and ICE candidate handling. Score 0 if core RTCPeerConnection logic is missing, 5 if only basic SDP exchange is implemented, and 10 if complete signaling with error handling is included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the media stream acquisition and display functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether getUserMedia() is properly implemented to access camera/microphone, and whether video/audio streams are correctly displayed in HTML video elements. Deduct 5 points if media constraints are not configured, and 3 points if stream cleanup on disconnect is missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the server communication protocol designed with proper error handling?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the fetch API implementation includes proper HTTP status code handling, network timeout management, and retry mechanisms for failed requests. Deduct 5 points if no error boundaries exist for server communication failures. Check whether Base64 encoding/decoding has validation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the complete WebRTC lifecycle management constructed?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes complete connection lifecycle management, including connection state monitoring, cleanup on page unload, and ICE connection state handling. Deduct 5 points if peer connection cleanup is not implemented, and 3 points if connection state callbacks are missing. Give 10 points if fully implemented with proper resource disposal.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as media permission denial, network interruption, SDP parsing errors, browser compatibility issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the WebRTC experience (e.g., 1. Real-time bandwidth monitoring and quality adaptation 2. Screen sharing capabilities 3. Recording functionality with playback controls 4. Audio/video filters or effects). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple media stream handlers coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to WebRTC streaming (e.g., built-in file upload system) 3. Fancy effects that affect streaming performance (e.g., heavy CSS animations during video calls). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core streaming functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating WebRTC logic/UI components/server communication), proper async/await usage, and error boundary implementation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or promises are not properly handled; deduct 5 points if the code lacks proper separation of concerns; deduct 5 points if memory leaks exist in media stream handling. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times) 4) Video element aspect ratio maintenance. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic video layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Media control button feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Connection status transition animations controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual indicators for connection states (connecting/connected/disconnected) 4) Smooth video rendering without stuttering. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jerky video transitions, and 5 points for unclear connection status indicators. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-communication/website-design-login-registration-carousel.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 381,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you produce is executable and functional. Design a website with 5 or more pages that includes login functionality, registration functionality, and a carousel/slider. You are free to add other features as you see fit. Use JavaScript for the design.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the multi-page website structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether 5 or more distinct pages are implemented with proper navigation structure. Each page should have a unique purpose and content. Verify that pages are properly linked with navigation elements (navbar, menu, footer links). Score 0 if fewer than 5 pages are implemented, 5 if the required number of pages exists but with structural issues, and 10 if the pages are well-organized with clear navigation paths and semantic HTML structure.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the login functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the login system includes form validation, proper error handling, and secure authentication practices. Check for input validation (email format, required fields), error messages, remember me functionality, and session management. Deduct 3 points if validation is incomplete, 3 points if error handling is missing or unclear, and 5 points if session management is not implemented. Award full points only if the login connects to a backend or simulates user authentication with local storage.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the registration functionality properly designed?",
-      "description": "Assess the registration system for comprehensive form validation, password strength requirements, duplicate username/email checking, and confirmation mechanisms. Verify that the registration form includes proper client-side validation (password format, email validation, required fields) and provides clear feedback. Deduct 3 points for missing field validation, 3 points for lack of password strength indicators, and 4 points if there's no confirmation step or success feedback. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the carousel/slider component fully functional?",
-      "description": "Review the carousel implementation for smooth transitions, responsive design, proper controls (next/prev buttons, indicators), and automatic rotation functionality. Check whether it handles different image sizes appropriately and works across various viewport sizes. Deduct 3 points if navigation controls are missing, 3 points if automatic rotation is not implemented, 2 points if it's not responsive, and 2 points if transitions are not smooth. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as form input errors, invalid URLs, API failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Dark mode toggle 2. Dynamic content loading 3. Interactive form components 4. User preference storage 5. Animated page transitions). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple validation systems coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to the requirements 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations or transitions). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI components, services, and utilities), code organization (proper file structure), and reuse of common components. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 3 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 2 points if there's no separation of concerns between HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times) 4) Consistent design language across all pages. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and responsive?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance 4) Fully responsive design that works on different screen sizes. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast interactions, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-communication/website-registration-login-music-black-green.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1672,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Design a website for me that includes a registration and login system with verification code, capability to automatically play music, with an overall black color scheme and green text.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the registration and login system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements a complete registration and login system, including user input validation, database interaction, session management, and proper error handling. Score 0 if basic form submission is missing, 5 if only client-side validation exists without server integration, and 10 if the system includes secure password storage (hashing), proper session management, and database connectivity.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the verification code functionality properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the verification code system includes: 1) Code generation with appropriate complexity, 2) Visual presentation with sufficient obfuscation, 3) Server-side validation, and 4) Expiration mechanism. Deduct 3 points if the code is too simple (e.g., static or predictable), 3 points if there's no server-side validation, and 4 points if there's no expiration mechanism. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the automatic music playback functionality effectively implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code implements automatic music playback that: 1) Handles autoplay policies correctly (with fallback), 2) Provides user controls for pause/play/volume, 3) Includes a playlist or music selection, and 4) Manages appropriate loading and error states. Deduct 3 points if modern autoplay restrictions aren't addressed, 3 points if basic controls are missing, and 4 points if there's no error handling for unavailable audio files. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the UI fulfill the black and green color scheme requirement?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the implementation properly applies a black background with green text throughout the website with: 1) Consistent application across all pages, 2) Proper contrast ratios for accessibility, 3) Thoughtful application to interactive elements, and 4) Consideration of visual hierarchy. Deduct 3 points if the contrast ratio is below accessibility standards, 3 points if the scheme is inconsistently applied, and 4 points if the result is visually jarring or unreadable. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid form inputs, network issues, authentication failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Dynamic background effects that respond to music, 2. Interactive form validation with visual feedback, 3. Custom animated loading indicators matching the theme). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple authentication methods without purpose) 2. Function modules unrelated to the core requirements (e.g., unnecessary social media integrations) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., heavy animations that slow page loading). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating frontend/backend concerns, MVC pattern usage), security practices (XSS prevention, CSRF protection, SQL injection prevention), and code organization. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if security best practices are ignored. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Proper use of the black and green color scheme with appropriate accents 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for poor implementation of the required color scheme, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance for the registration/login process. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during interactions, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-chat-window-vue3-ant-design.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1237,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for demonstration purposes. Now, a page similar to a WeChat chat window is needed. Please write such a page using Ant Design + Vue 3. The page only needs to display chat messages without message sending functionality. The message data consists of multiple records returned from the backend.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Vue 3 + Ant Design integration properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the project correctly sets up Vue 3 with Ant Design, including proper component imports, configuration of Ant Design Vue plugin, and CSS/Less imports. Verify that the package.json includes the correct dependencies (ant-design-vue, vue@3.x). Deduct 5 points if components are imported incorrectly, 5 points if global styles are missing, and 3 points if the version compatibility is not handled. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the chat window UI structure properly designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the component hierarchy and structure of the chat window. It should include at least: a container component, message list component, and individual message components with proper differentiation between sent and received messages. Score 0 if the structure is missing, 5 if basic structure is implemented but lacks proper organization, and 10 if the component breakdown is logical and follows Vue 3 best practices with proper props/emit usage.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the message rendering implementation complete?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code correctly handles different message types (text, image, system notification, etc.) from the backend data and renders them appropriately. Verify that the component uses v-for with proper key binding for message lists. Deduct 5 points if message types aren't properly differentiated, 3 points if keys are missing or improper, and 3 points if the rendering isn't responsive. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the implementation mimic WeChat's visual style?",
-      "description": "Check if the UI resembles WeChat's chat interface, including bubble styles, colors, message alignment (left for received, right for sent), timestamps, and avatars. Score 0 if it doesn't resemble WeChat at all, 5 if it has basic similarities, and 10 if it closely resembles WeChat's design with attention to detail like bubble tails, proper spacing, and consistent styling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as missing message fields, empty messages, very long messages without breaks, special characters in messages, etc.) and provide appropriate fallbacks or error handling. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Message read status indicators 2. Message time grouping 3. Automatic scroll to newest messages 4. Skeleton loading for messages). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple methods for message display) 2. Function modules unrelated to chat display (e.g., unnecessary animations) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., complex transitions for every message). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI components and data handling logic), composition API usage, and type safety (TypeScript or PropTypes). Deduct 5 points if global state is used unnecessarily; deduct 5 points if the code has high duplication; deduct 5 points if there's no separation between presentation and business logic. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching consistent with WeChat's palette 2) Proper layout spacing between messages and within message components 3) Professional font system with appropriate sizing and contrast. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Smooth scrolling through message history 2) Appropriate loading states when fetching messages 3) Clear visual differentiation between message types and senders. Deduct 5 points for jerky scrolling, 3 points for missing loading states, and 5 points for confusing message attribution (unclear who sent what). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-cloud-printing-mini-program.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1558,
-  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Create a WeChat cloud printing mini-program interface code.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the WeChat mini-program page structure correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code correctly implements the WeChat mini-program page structure (WXML, WXSS, JS) following WeChat's development standards. Check if the app.json, app.wxss, and necessary pages are defined. Score 0 if the basic structure is missing, 5 if only partial implementation exists, and 10 if the complete structure with proper configuration is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the cloud printing core functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess if the code implements essential cloud printing functions: file upload, printer selection, print parameters configuration (color/B&W, copies, paper size, etc.), and print job submission. Deduct 3 points for each missing core function. Give 10 points only if the complete printing workflow is implemented with proper error handling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the implementation include WeChat's authorization and cloud capabilities?",
-      "description": "Check if the code correctly integrates WeChat's login authorization, file management APIs, and cloud functions/database for storing printing tasks. Verify if the implementation follows WeChat's security best practices. Deduct 5 points if user authorization is missing, and 5 points if cloud storage integration is incomplete or insecure.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the print job management system implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code includes a complete print job management system with status tracking (queued, printing, completed, failed), history viewing, and cancellation features. Check if job notifications are implemented. Score 0 if job management is absent, 5 if basic tracking exists, and 10 if comprehensive management with all features is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as upload failures, network interruptions, authorization rejections) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Print preview functionality 2. OCR text extraction from images 3. Document format conversion 4. Location-based nearest printer recommendation). Add 2.5 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple file upload methods with overlapping functionality) 2. Function modules unrelated to cloud printing (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Excessive animations or effects that affect performance. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating service/UI/state management layers), component reusability, and adherence to WeChat Mini-Program best practices. Deduct 5 points if global state management is chaotic; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if WeChat lifecycle hooks are misused. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat's design principles: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual language 2) Proper layout spacing and component sizing 3) Professional typography hierarchy. Deduct 3 points for each UI element that doesn't follow WeChat design standards, 5 points for inconsistent visual styles, and 5 points for poor information architecture. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat mini-program performance standards: 1) Page loading time ≤ 300ms 2) Smooth transitions between major functions 3) Clear loading states during network operations. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy animations, and 5 points for confusing navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-like-chat-tool-with-admin-backend.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1087,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable whenever possible. Write an online chat tool similar to WeChat that supports one-to-one and one-to-many conversations, and includes an administrative backend.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic chat functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements core chat features including message sending/receiving, chat history loading, and read status tracking. Check if the messaging system handles text messages, emojis, and media attachments. Score 0 if messaging doesn't work, 5 if only basic text messaging is implemented, and 10 if all expected chat features (including typing indicators and read receipts) are fully functional.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are one-to-one and group chat features properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code properly handles both private and group conversations with appropriate data structures and UI differentiation. Check if group chats include member management, admin controls, and proper message broadcasting. Deduct 5 points if group chat lacks member management features, 3 points if chat history doesn't properly separate by conversation type. Full score requires both chat types to be fully functional with proper conversation switching.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the administrative backend complete and functional?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the admin panel includes user management (add/edit/delete/ban), content moderation tools, analytics dashboard, and system configuration options. Check for role-based access control and audit logging. Deduct 5 points if user management is incomplete, 3 points if content moderation tools are missing, and 5 points if there's no proper authentication for admin access. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is real-time communication properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code implements WebSockets or a similar technology for real-time message delivery with proper connection management. Evaluate if the implementation includes connection state handling, reconnection logic, and message queuing during disconnections. Deduct 5 points if there's no offline message handling, 3 points if there's no typing indicator, and 5 points if message delivery isn't truly real-time. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network interruptions, server errors, invalid inputs, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should include proper error handling, input validation, and recovery mechanisms, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. End-to-end encryption 2. Interactive message reactions 3. Smart message prioritization 4. AI chatbot integration). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple notification systems coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to messaging (e.g., complex games embedded in chat) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations or transitions). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/business logic/data layers), code reusability, documentation, and testing coverage. Deduct 5 points if global state management is messy or architectural patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there are no tests or documentation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern messaging app principles: 1) Clean and consistent chat bubbles 2) Clear visual hierarchy between conversations and messages 3) Professional typography and spacing (message text ≥ 14px, adequate whitespace). Deduct 3 points for cluttered conversation lists, 5 points for poor contrast or readability issues, and 5 points for inconsistent visual styling between screens. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to user expectations for a modern chat application: 1) Message sending feedback ≤ 100ms 2) Smooth scrolling through chat history 3) Intuitive navigation between conversations. Deduct 5 points for laggy message sending, 3 points for jerky animations during conversation switching, and 5 points for unintuitive navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-mini-program-framework-profile-orders-settings.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 964,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the generated code is executable for demonstration. Create a WeChat Mini Program with one large framework containing three smaller frameworks. The first framework includes a profile picture and nickname. The second framework contains three small icons: Received, To Be Received, and All Orders. The third framework includes Personal Information, Shipping Address, and Feedback.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the three-framework structure correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Verify if the code establishes a clear layout with one large container framework properly divided into three distinct sections with appropriate styling and responsive behavior. Check if the frameworks are built using appropriate WXML structure with proper styling. Score 0 if the three-framework structure is missing, 5 if implemented with basic styling, 10 if fully responsive with proper hierarchical relationship.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the first framework with profile picture and nickname properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Examine if the profile section includes proper image component for avatar display with appropriate sizing and borders, nickname text with proper styling, and user information retrieval from WeChat APIs (wx.getUserInfo or equivalent). Check if the avatar handles loading errors and defaults. Deduct 3 points if avatar placeholder is missing, 3 points if the nickname styling is inadequate, and 4 points if no WeChat API integration is attempted. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the second framework with three order status icons properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the order status section includes three well-defined, equally-spaced icons with appropriate labels (Received, To Be Received, All Orders), proper visual indication of current selection status, and navigation functionality. Check if the icons have proper tap event bindings to navigate to respective order lists. Score 0 if icons are missing, 5 if basic implementation without proper event handling, 10 if fully functional with appropriate visual feedback on tap.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the third framework with user functions properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the user function framework properly implements Personal Information, Shipping Address, and Feedback options with appropriate icons, text labels, and navigation indicators (like right arrows). Verify if each option has event bindings to navigate to respective pages. Deduct 3 points for each missing function, 2 points if navigation indicators are absent, and 2 points if the styling is inconsistent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as missing user information, permission denials, network issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Custom animations for transitions 2. Dynamic theme customization 3. Smart recommendations based on order history). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to access the same page) 2. Function modules unrelated to user profile (e.g., built-in games) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/logic/data layers), component reusability, and proper use of WeChat Mini Program lifecycle methods. Deduct 5 points if global state management is chaotic or missing; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if app.json and page.json configurations are improper. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat Mini Program design principles: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual language 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional typography (font sizes between 12-20px, appropriate line height). Deduct 3 points for each inconsistent visual element, 5 points for non-WeChat style UI components, and 5 points for chaotic information hierarchy. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat Mini Program standards: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animations controlled between 200-400ms 3) Clear visual state changes for interactive elements. Deduct 5 points for each interaction without feedback, 3 points for janky animations, and 5 points for unintuitive navigation flows. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-communication/wechat-mini-program-my-page-login.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1319,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Help me create the source code for a \"My Page\" (including user login functionality) for a scenic spot ticket-purchasing WeChat Mini Program developed using WeChat Developer Tools, and beautify the page design.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program user login system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code correctly implements WeChat Mini Program's authorization login process, including wx.getUserProfile(), wx.login(), and backend session_key validation. Check if user information storage and status management are properly handled. Score 0 if core login logic is missing, 5 if only basic login is implemented without proper error handling, and 10 if complete WeChat authorization flow with session management is fully implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the \"My Page\" user interface comprehensively designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the My Page includes essential user center features: user avatar/nickname display, order history, ticket collection, personal settings, and logout functionality. Check if the page structure follows WeChat Mini Program design guidelines. Deduct 3 points for each missing core module, 5 points if navigation structure is unclear. Full score requires complete user center ecosystem.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the scenic spot ticket purchasing integration properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the My Page seamlessly integrates with ticket purchasing features, including order status display, ticket usage records, refund/exchange options, and QR code ticket display. Evaluate if the data flow between user operations and ticket management is correctly handled. Deduct 5 points if order management is incomplete, 3 points if ticket status updates are not real-time.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program lifecycle and API usage correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code properly handles WeChat Mini Program lifecycle events (onLoad, onShow, onHide), uses appropriate APIs (wx.setStorageSync, wx.navigateTo, wx.showToast), and implements proper data binding with WXML/WXSS. Check if app.json and page.json configurations are complete. Deduct 5 points if lifecycle management is poor, 3 points if API usage is inefficient.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (network failure, login timeout, data loading errors, WeChat API call failures, etc.) and provide user-friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle edge cases and provide graceful degradation. Give 10 points if fully robust, 5 points if average robustness, 0 points if no exception handling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that enhance user experience?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes thoughtful features that improve user experience (e.g., 1. Smart recommendation based on visit history 2. Social sharing of scenic spot experiences 3. Offline ticket storage 4. Voice navigation integration 5. AR scenic spot preview). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple user info storage methods) 2. Function modules unrelated to scenic spot ticketing (e.g., built-in games or unrelated e-commerce) 3. Excessive animations that affect Mini Program performance. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (proper separation of pages, components, and utils), code organization following WeChat Mini Program best practices, and reusable component structure. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or improper data flow management; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate exceeds 30%; deduct 3 points if file structure doesn't follow Mini Program conventions.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface design meet WeChat Mini Program and scenic spot industry standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows WeChat Design Guidelines and scenic spot app aesthetics: 1) Color scheme suitable for tourism industry (natural, trustworthy colors) 2) Proper use of WeChat UI components (van-weapp or similar) 3) Clear visual hierarchy with tourism-themed iconography 4) Responsive design for different screen sizes. Deduct 3 points for each design inconsistency, 5 points for poor color choices, 5 points for cluttered layout.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the user interaction smooth and follows WeChat Mini Program UX patterns?",
-      "description": "Judge whether interactions conform to WeChat Mini Program user expectations: 1) Page transitions using proper navigation APIs 2) Loading states with wx.showLoading() 3) Touch feedback following WeChat standards 4) Intuitive gesture support 5) Proper use of WeChat native components. Deduct 5 points for each non-standard interaction pattern, 3 points for slow page transitions, 5 points for unclear user flow navigation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Communication",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}