@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.0

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/e-commerce-product-management-system.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 643,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. Develop an e-commerce product management system where customers can browse product listings on the frontend, view product details (including product name, price, inventory, description), and add products to their shopping cart. Merchants (username: seller, password: seller123) can log into the backend to add, delete, and modify product information, as well as process orders.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the product listing and browsing functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the product listing displays essential information (product images, names, prices) in a clean grid or list view. Verify filtering and sorting capabilities (by price, category, popularity). The interface should support pagination or infinite scroll for large catalogs. Score 0 if the listing is non-functional, 5 if basic listing exists without filtering, 10 if complete with all product details and advanced filtering options.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are product detail pages comprehensive and user-friendly?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if product detail pages show complete information (high-resolution images with zoom capability, detailed description, price, inventory status, specifications, and customer reviews). Check for related/similar product suggestions. Score 0 if detail pages are missing, 5 if they only show basic information without images or with poor layout, 10 if comprehensive with intuitive navigation and rich media support.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the shopping cart functionality properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Verify if users can add/remove items, adjust quantities, and see real-time price calculations. Cart should persist between sessions (using localStorage or user accounts), show inventory limitations, and provide clear checkout options. Score 0 if cart functionality is absent, 5 if basic add/remove works but lacks persistence or quantity management, 10 if fully functional with error handling for out-of-stock items.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the merchant backend management system complete?",
-      "description": "Check if the seller interface includes secure login (username: seller, password: seller123), comprehensive product CRUD operations, batch operations for inventory, and order management capabilities. Verify image upload functionality and rich text editor for product descriptions. Score 0 if backend management is missing, 5 if basic functions work but lack data validation or have usability issues, 10 if complete with advanced features and security measures.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles common abnormal situations (invalid inputs, network failures, authentication errors) and provides friendly error messages. Verify form validation, secure authentication, and data persistence integrity. Score 0 if no error handling exists, 5 if basic validations are implemented but edge cases are ignored, 10 if comprehensive error handling with graceful recovery mechanisms exist throughout the application.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check for surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AI-powered product recommendations 2. Real-time inventory alerts 3. Visual search capabilities 4. AR product previews). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple cart management systems) 2. Function modules unrelated to e-commerce (e.g., built-in games) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow page loading). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separation of concerns between product display, cart management, and admin functions), consistent coding patterns, component reusability, and proper data management. Deduct 5 points if global state is poorly managed; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate is high; deduct 5 points if the application lacks proper build/deployment configuration. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional e-commerce design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows e-commerce best practices: 1) Clear product hierarchy and visual hierarchy 2) Consistent branding and color scheme (primary, secondary, accent colors) 3) Professional typography (readable product titles, descriptions) 4) Proper use of white space and grid layouts. Deduct 3 points for cluttered product displays, 5 points for inconsistent visual language across pages, and 5 points for poor mobile responsiveness. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the shopping experience feels natural: 1) Product filtering/sorting updates ≤ 300ms 2) Add-to-cart animations are subtle and satisfying 3) Clear loading states during data fetching 4) Form submissions provide immediate feedback. Deduct 5 points for laggy product browsing, 3 points for jarring page transitions, and 5 points for confusing checkout flow. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/e-commerce-webpage-image-text-minimalist-european.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 761,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure that the code you generate is executable for display. Please help me create a webpage for an e-commerce site that needs to showcase images and text content. The design preference is for a minimalist European feel, and you can handle the rest as you see fit.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the e-commerce product showcase system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the HTML/CSS/JavaScript implementation includes a responsive product grid, product detail views, and effective image handling techniques. Score 0 if the core product display functionality is missing, 5 if only basic product showcasing is implemented, and 10 if the showcase includes features like image zoom/gallery views, product filtering, and smooth transitions between product views.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the minimalist European design aesthetic properly executed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of minimalist European design principles including ample whitespace, restrained typography (preferably sans-serif), muted color palette (whites, grays, with minimal accent colors), and focus on product presentation rather than decorative elements. Deduct 3 points for each design element that contradicts minimalist European aesthetics (e.g., busy patterns, excessive colors, cluttered layouts). Award full points only if the design achieves elegant simplicity with purposeful negative space.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the e-commerce navigation system intuitive and complete?",
-      "description": "Check for implementation of essential e-commerce navigation components: primary navigation menu, search functionality, category filters, breadcrumbs, and cart/checkout access. Deduct 2 points for each missing navigation element and 3 points if the navigation is not persistent across the site. Review the mobile navigation adaptation – deduct 5 points if the mobile menu is not properly implemented or accessible.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is product information architecture effectively structured?",
-      "description": "Assess how product information is structured and presented. Check for clear hierarchies between product titles, prices, descriptions, specifications, and availability. Evaluate whether the code implements semantic HTML elements for proper information hierarchy. Deduct 5 points if product cards lack essential information and 5 points if the information architecture doesn't prioritize key purchasing decision factors. Award full points for clean, scannable product information that follows established e-commerce patterns.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as missing images, slow loading content, invalid product data, etc.) and provide friendly error handling or fallback mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the e-commerce experience (e.g., 1. Subtle micro-animations on hover/interaction 2. Product comparison tool 3. Intelligent product recommendations 4. Elegant image lazy-loading with placeholders). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple carousel libraries coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to e-commerce showcase (e.g., unnecessary social media widgets) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations or heavy background videos). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating component structure/styling/behavior), use of modern front-end practices (CSS organization, JavaScript modules), and performance optimization. Deduct 5 points if global CSS/JS pollution is found; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no performance optimizations are implemented (image optimization, code splitting, etc.). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern e-commerce design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times) 4) Consistent product card design. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the responsive design properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the site functions properly across device sizes (mobile, tablet, desktop): 1) No horizontal scrolling on mobile devices 2) Touch-friendly tap targets (min 44x44px) 3) Appropriate font scaling between devices 4) Efficient use of screen real estate at all breakpoints. Deduct 5 points for unreadable text or unusable elements on mobile, 3 points for layout issues at standard breakpoints, and 5 points for performance issues on mobile devices. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/food-ordering-delivery-webpage.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1743,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for demonstration purposes. Write an HTML page for food ordering and delivery.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the food ordering system core functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements menu browsing, item selection, shopping cart management, and order placement through HTML/JavaScript. Must include food categorization, price calculation, quantity adjustment, and order summary generation. Score 0 if core ordering logic is missing, 5 if only basic menu display is implemented, and 10 if complete ordering workflow with cart persistence is included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the delivery tracking and management system implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the delivery functionality includes real-time order status updates, delivery time estimation, and tracking interface. Should implement order state management (pending, preparing, dispatched, delivered) with visual progress indicators. Deduct 5 points if status updates are missing, and 3 points if delivery time estimation is not provided. Full score requires interactive tracking with map integration or timeline view.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is user account and payment integration properly designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the system includes user registration/login, address management, payment method selection, and order history. Must provide secure form validation, address auto-completion, and multiple payment options simulation. Deduct 5 points if user session management is missing, and 3 points if payment form validation is inadequate. Full score requires complete user profile management with order history.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is restaurant and menu management comprehensively constructed?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes restaurant selection, detailed menu with categories, item descriptions, images, and dietary information (vegetarian, allergens, etc.). Must implement search/filter functionality, restaurant ratings, and availability status. Deduct 5 points if menu categorization is missing, and 3 points if search functionality is not implemented. Give 10 points if fully implemented with rich metadata.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid form input, network timeouts, empty cart submission, invalid addresses, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle edge cases like duplicate orders, payment failures, and session timeouts, giving 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the user experience (e.g., 1. Real-time order customization with visual builder 2. AI-powered food recommendations 3. Live delivery tracking with estimated arrival 4. Social features like reviews and photo sharing 5. Loyalty points system). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple cart management systems) 2. Function modules unrelated to food ordering (e.g., built-in games or social media feeds) 3. Excessive animations that slow down ordering process (e.g., heavy 3D effects on menu items). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core ordering functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating menu logic/cart management/UI components), code organization, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or no clear separation of concerns; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no consistent naming conventions or poor code structure. The full score is 10 points for well-organized, maintainable code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern food delivery app principles: 1) Appetizing color scheme with food-appropriate palette 2) Proper layout spacing with clear visual hierarchy (element spacing follows 8px grid) 3) Professional typography (readable font sizes ≥ 14px, appropriate line height ≥ 1.5) 4) High-quality food imagery presentation. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for unappetizing color combinations, and 5 points for poor food image presentation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the ordering flow provides optimal user experience: 1) Immediate feedback for add-to-cart actions (≤ 100ms) 2) Smooth transitions between menu sections (300-500ms) 3) Clear visual feedback for quantity changes and cart updates 4) Intuitive navigation with breadcrumbs 5) Loading states for all async operations. Deduct 5 points for each operation without visual feedback, 3 points for jarring transitions, and 5 points for confusing navigation flow.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/frontend-payment-verification-page-callback.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1253,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the generated code is executable and demonstrable.\n\nhttp://www.xxtmooc.com/u/xi2v/pay?pid=1384&type=alipay&out_trade_no=2025032016561201700\nThis is a callback URL for successful payment, which will redirect to a frontend payment verification page.\n\nPlease help me design a frontend payment verification page that receives callback parameters where xi2v is the agent ID.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Does the code properly parse and validate the callback URL parameters?",
-      "description": "Check if the code extracts and validates all URL parameters (pid, type, out_trade_no, agent ID from URL path) using proper JavaScript methods. Test if it handles URL encoding/decoding correctly. Score 0 if no parameter parsing exists, 5 if basic extraction exists but validation is missing, 10 if comprehensive parameter validation with security checks is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the payment verification logic implemented correctly?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the code includes verification API calls with proper error handling. Check if it implements signature verification, transaction status checks, and amount verification. Deduct 5 points if verification is only client-side without server confirmation, 3 points if there's no retry mechanism for failed verification. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are security measures implemented to prevent payment fraud?",
-      "description": "Review if the code includes anti-CSRF measures, XSS prevention, parameter tampering detection, and proper use of HTTPS for API calls. Check for replay attack prevention mechanisms like nonce or timestamp verification. Deduct 10 points if security is completely neglected, 5 points if basic but insufficient security exists. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the agent ID (xi2v) handling correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Verify if the agent ID is properly extracted from the URL path, validated, and used in subsequent API calls or revenue attribution. Check if the code properly handles different agent formats and edge cases. Deduct 5 points if agent ID validation is missing, 3 points if revenue attribution is not tracked. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as missing parameters, network interruption, verification timeout, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time transaction verification status 2. QR code for receipt 3. Animation for successful payment). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple verification logics coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to payment verification (e.g., unnecessary user profile features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., heavy animations during critical verification processes). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating API calls/UI/state management), error handling mechanisms, and maintainable structure. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the code is not properly commented or documented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Immediate feedback when verification starts ≤ 100ms 2) Loading indicators for API calls 3) Clear success/failure states with appropriate transitions. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jarring transitions between verification states, and 5 points for confusing success/failure indicators. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/green-hui-farm-store-pre-order-special.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1799,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Pre-Order Special at Green Hui Farm Store\n\n## Available Items for Pre-Order:\n\n### Pork Products\n- Pork\n- Spare ribs\n- Fan bones\n- Tube bones\n- Dragon bones\n- Rib heads\n- Pig hands\n- Pig trotters\n- Pig tails\n- Crystal willow\n- Apple meat\n- Plum willow meat\n- Small exhibition meat\n- Pork shoulder\n- Plum blossom meat\n- Pork belly\n- Tenderloin\n- Pig liver\n- Pig heart\n- Pig tongue\n- Pig liver\n- Pig kidney\n- Vermicelli intestines\n\n### Beef Products\n- Beef\n- Beef ribs\n- Tender beef\n- Beef tendon\n- Hanging dragon\n- Snow flake beef\n\n### Fish\n- Sea bass\n- Crucian carp\n- Sunfish\n- Yellow bone fish\n- Tilapia\n- Grass carp\n- Pond corner fish\n\n### Vegetables\n- Pointed-leaf choy sum\n- Lianzhou choy sum\n- Late choy sum\n- Local choy sum\n- Local lettuce\n- Local oil lettuce\n- Local thin chives\n\n## Pre-Order Discounts:\n- ¥4 off orders over ¥50\n- ¥10 off orders over ¥100\n- ¥22 off orders over ¥200",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the pre-order system UI properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code accurately implements the product categorization UI (Pork Products, Beef Products, Fish, Vegetables) with clear visual hierarchy and proper labeling. Score 0 if categories are not implemented, 5 if basic categories exist but without visual distinction, and 10 if categories are clearly styled with proper headers and section separators.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the product listing functionality complete?",
-      "description": "Review whether all 37 products across the 4 categories (23 pork items, 6 beef items, 7 fish items, 7 vegetable items) are correctly implemented with proper naming and categorization. Deduct 2 points for each missing or incorrectly categorized product. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the discount logic properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of the tiered discount system (¥4 off over ¥50, ¥10 off over ¥100, ¥22 off over ¥200). Check for correct mathematical calculations, proper threshold detection, and whether discounts are automatically applied to eligible orders. Deduct 3 points if discounts are not applied automatically, 4 points if the calculation logic is incorrect, and 3 points if discount thresholds are not properly detected. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the shopping cart functionality comprehensive?",
-      "description": "Check whether the shopping cart includes essential functions like adding/removing items, quantity adjustment, real-time price calculation, and subtotal display. The system should maintain item counts accurately and apply discounts correctly. Deduct 3 points if quantity management is missing, 3 points if real-time calculation is absent, and 4 points if the cart doesn't persist during the session. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as out-of-bounds input, network interruption, user operation errors, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time stock availability indicator 2. Seasonal product highlighting 3. Personalized recommendations based on cart items). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple discount calculation methods) 2. Function modules unrelated to pre-ordering (e.g., a built-in game while waiting) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary animations on product listings). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating product data/UI/calculation logic), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast scrolling through product lists, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/hotel-room-reservation-system-frontend.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 510,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable. Please write code to implement a hotel room reservation system frontend where users can input check-in and check-out dates, and the system will display available room types (standard room, deluxe suite, etc.) and their corresponding prices in real-time. After selecting a room type, users can submit reservation information including the guest's name, contact information, etc.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the date selection functionality properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the date picker allows users to select check-in and check-out dates with proper validation (check-out must be after check-in, no past dates allowed, etc.). Verify if the date range selection updates the room availability and pricing in real-time. Score 0 if date selection is missing, 5 if basic implementation exists but lacks validation, and 10 if fully implemented with all validations and real-time updates.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the room type display and selection system complete?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code properly displays different room types with their descriptions, amenities, pricing, and availability based on the selected dates. Check if users can select room types and if the selection is visually indicated. Deduct 5 points if room descriptions are missing, 3 points if price calculation doesn't account for stay duration, and 3 points if availability status is not clearly indicated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the guest information form comprehensive and validated?",
-      "description": "Review whether the reservation form includes all necessary fields (name, email, phone, special requests, etc.) with proper validation. Check if form validation provides user-friendly error messages and prevents submission of invalid data. Deduct 3 points for each missing essential field, 5 points for weak or missing input validation, and 3 points for poor error handling. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the reservation submission and confirmation process implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the system properly handles the reservation submission process, including data validation, submission feedback, and confirmation display. Verify if a confirmation number or summary is provided after successful submission. Deduct 5 points if there's no submission feedback, 5 points if reservation summary is missing, and 3 points if there's no way to modify a reservation before final submission. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network issues during submission, invalid data inputs, concurrent reservations for the same room, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Room comparison tool 2. Price history graph showing rate fluctuations 3. Interactive room preview/virtual tour). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple calendar implementations) 2. Function modules unrelated to hotel reservation (e.g., a built-in currency converter) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations when scrolling through rooms). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI components/state management/form validation logic), code reusability, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's poor component organization. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Immediate feedback when changing dates or room selection 2) Smooth transitions between reservation steps 3) Clear visual indications for selected options and available/unavailable rooms. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy transitions, and 5 points for confusing navigation between steps. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/international-trade-product-website-carousel.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1814,
-  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please utilize your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Ensure that the code you produce is executable for demonstration. Create a simple international trade product website with a carousel/slideshow banner.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the carousel/slideshow banner fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the carousel includes essential features: automatic sliding, manual navigation (prev/next buttons), indicator dots, responsive images, and smooth transitions. Score 0 if the carousel is not implemented, 5 if only basic sliding is included, and 10 if all features are properly implemented with optimized performance (preloading images, efficient animation).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the international trade product showcase properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the product listing includes essential e-commerce elements: product images, names, prices, brief descriptions, and call-to-action buttons. Products should be organized by categories relevant to international trade (e.g., by country, industry, or certification). Deduct 3 points if products lack critical information, 3 points if categorization is poor, and 4 points if there's no filtering/sorting functionality. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the website include international trade specific features?",
-      "description": "Review for industry-specific elements such as country of origin indicators, shipping/logistics information, trade terms (Incoterms), currency converters, or certification icons (e.g., CE, FDA). Deduct 5 points if completely missing these elements. Award full 10 points if the site includes at least 3 specialized international trade features implemented functionally.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the website responsive and cross-browser compatible?",
-      "description": "Test whether the layout adapts properly to different screen sizes (mobile, tablet, desktop) and works correctly in major browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari). Check if media queries are implemented correctly and if the carousel maintains functionality across devices. Deduct 5 points for broken layouts on mobile, 3 points for browser-specific issues, and 2 points for missing viewport meta tag. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as missing images, slow network connections, user interaction errors, etc.) and provide friendly error handling or fallbacks. Code with strong robustness should include image error handling, graceful degradation, and form validation. Give 10 points for comprehensive error handling, 5 points for basic error handling, and 0 points if errors crash the functionality.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Interactive product comparison 2. Quick-view product modals 3. Animated statistics about trade volumes 4. Multi-language support). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple carousel libraries used together) 2. Function modules unrelated to international trade products (e.g., unrelated social media feeds) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations or 3D effects). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating HTML structure, CSS styling, and JavaScript behavior), code organization, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if inline styles/scripts are heavily used; deduct 3 points if CSS selectors are inefficient or overly specific; deduct 2 points if JavaScript is not properly structured or contains global namespace pollution. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching suitable for international business (professional blues, neutral tones) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for cluttered layouts, 5 points for unprofessional color schemes, and 5 points for poor typography. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Carousel transitions smooth without janky movements 2) Hover/click states provide clear feedback within 100ms 3) Page loading optimized with proper indicators. Deduct 5 points for laggy transitions, 3 points for missing interactive feedback, and 5 points for carousel animations that are disorienting or too fast/slow. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/jd-ecommerce-homepage-vue.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1336,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code in your demonstration. Write a JD.com (京东) e-commerce homepage using Vue.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core e-commerce homepage structure fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code includes essential e-commerce components: header with search functionality, navigation menu, product carousel/banner, featured products grid, category navigation, and footer. Score 0 if the basic structure is missing, 5 if partial implementation exists, and 10 if all core components are properly structured and responsive.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the Vue component architecture properly designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the Vue component hierarchy and data flow. Components should follow single-responsibility principle, with clear parent-child relationships and proper props/events communication. Deduct 5 points for global state overuse when local state is sufficient, 3 points for prop drilling beyond 3 levels, and 5 points for missing key Vue lifecycle hooks. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the JD.com brand identity properly represented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the implementation captures JD.com's distinctive visual elements: correct logo usage, JD's red color scheme (#E1251B), typography style, and overall brand aesthetic. Deduct 3 points for incorrect brand colors, 5 points for missing or improper logo placement, and 3 points if the overall visual doesn't match JD's signature style. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the product display and catalog navigation properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the product grid/list implementation including image display, pricing, ratings, promotional badges, and category filtering/navigation. Check for lazy-loading of images and infinite scrolling or pagination. Deduct 5 points if product cards lack essential information, 3 points for inefficient rendering of large lists, and 5 points for poor category navigation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors during product loading, image loading failures, search with no results, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Personalized product recommendations 2. Interactive product previews 3. Voice search capability). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple carousel components with similar functionality) 2. Function modules unrelated to e-commerce (e.g., built-in games) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI components, services, and store), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or Vue best practices are not followed; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not properly configured. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern e-commerce design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast sliding, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}