@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.0

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/simple-secondhand-shopping-website.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1574,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you provide is executable. I am a third-year student majoring in software technology, and I need to submit an assignment the day after tomorrow. I need something that can run successfully on my computer, so please help me create it and teach me how to download the software, configure it, and run it successfully to demonstrate the results.\n\nHere's what I've studied: 1. Using HTML and CSS to develop commercial websites 2. Introduction to programming 3. Linux basics 4. Object-oriented programming 5. MySQL database management 6. JavaScript programming 7. Database systems and applications 8. Dynamic website development (PHP) 9. HTML5+CSS3 development 10. WEB client-side development 11. Website construction and management. I need you to complete my requirements based on what I've learned. I'd like to use Vue and Bootstrap for the frontend, and for the backend, anything I've studied will work. For the content, I want to create a simple secondhand goods shopping website - the simpler the better.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core secondhand goods listing and browsing functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements essential e-commerce features: product listings with image display, category filtering, search functionality, and individual product detail pages. Check if Vue components are properly structured with props and event handling. Score 0 if these core features are absent, 5 if basic implementation exists but lacks refinement, and 10 if all features are fully functional with proper data binding.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is user authentication and account management implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of user registration, login/logout functionality, and profile management. Check if proper validation is applied to forms, if password storage follows security best practices, and if session management is handled correctly. Deduct 3 points if validation is missing, 4 points if there's no password hashing, and 3 points if session persistence is not implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the product management system (CRUD operations) implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if users can add new secondhand items, edit their listings, delete them, and if the system properly manages product status (available, sold, reserved). Verify if image upload functionality works and if form validation is present. Deduct 3 points if any CRUD operation is missing, 3 points if image uploads don't work, and 4 points if there's no proper form validation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is database integration properly implemented with appropriate data modeling?",
-      "description": "Assess whether MySQL database is properly structured with normalized tables for users, products, categories, and transactions. Check if proper relationships (foreign keys) are established, and if PHP/backend code uses prepared statements to prevent SQL injection. Deduct 5 points for poor database schema design, 5 points for security vulnerabilities in database access code. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid inputs, database connection failures, server errors, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time notifications for price drops 2. Recommendation system based on browsing history 3. Integration with maps for local pickup). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple user profile editing pages) 2. Function modules unrelated to secondhand goods shopping (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating frontend/backend concerns, Vue component structure, CSS organization), code reusability, and project structure. Deduct 5 points if global variable pollution is found; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear organization of files and dependencies. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the Bootstrap implementation follows design principles: 1) Consistent use of Bootstrap components 2) Mobile-responsive design 3) Professional color scheme that matches the purpose of the site. Deduct 3 points for inconsistent component usage, 4 points for non-responsive layouts, and 3 points for unprofessional color combinations or typography. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the Vue implementation provides good user experience: 1) Form submissions with validation feedback 2) Loading states during API calls 3) Smooth transitions between pages. Deduct 3 points for missing loading indicators, 3 points for jarring page transitions, and 4 points for forms that submit without validation or feedback. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/snack-menu-mini-program-food-delivery.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1561,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you provide can be executed properly. Help me create a comprehensive snack menu mini-program that includes food delivery service and delivery time options.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the snack menu display system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the menu display with proper categorization (appetizers, main dishes, desserts, drinks), item details (name, price, description, image), and filtering/sorting capabilities. Score 0 if the core display logic is missing, 5 if only basic listing is implemented, and 10 if comprehensive menu features including search/filter/categorization are fully included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the food ordering and checkout process complete?",
-      "description": "Check whether the implementation includes item selection, quantity modification, shopping cart management, and a smooth checkout flow. The system should handle order validation, pricing calculation (including taxes and fees), and provide order summaries. Deduct 5 points if the cart functionality is incomplete, and 3 points if order modification capabilities are missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the delivery service system properly designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements address input/validation, delivery radius checking, delivery fee calculation based on distance, and estimated arrival time calculation. Deduct 5 points if address validation is missing, and 3 points if dynamic delivery time estimation based on distance and current load isn't implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the delivery time selection and scheduling mechanism implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code provides time slot selection for scheduled deliveries, handles peak hour limitations, displays available/unavailable time slots, and implements order queueing logic. Deduct 5 points if time conflict resolution is not implemented, and 3 points if there's no handling of restaurant capacity constraints. Give 10 points if fully implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as incomplete user input, network failures, payment processing errors, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time order tracking on a map 2. Dietary preference filtering (vegetarian, gluten-free, etc.) 3. Customizable items with price adjustments). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to add items to cart) 2. Function modules unrelated to food ordering (e.g., a built-in news feed) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations when scrolling through menu). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating menu/cart/checkout/delivery logic), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast scrolling through the menu, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons (like checkout or add to cart). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/supermarket-wechat-mini-program.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1271,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Take care to ensure the code you produce is executable and demonstrable. Program a complete software solution for a supermarket WeChat mini-program, featuring online display, product categorization, shopping cart functionality, barcode scanner support, date management, inventory management, and image support. Priced at 10 yuan for 3 items, with supermarket checkout capability.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the WeChat mini-program structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code follows WeChat mini-program framework requirements, including correct use of app.js, app.json, app.wxss for global configurations, and proper page structure. Check that page lifecycle methods (onLoad, onShow, etc.) are correctly implemented. Score 0 if mini-program structure is missing, 5 if basic structure exists but with incorrect implementation, and 10 if fully compliant with WeChat development standards.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the product catalog and categorization system fully functional?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of product categorization, including data structure design, category navigation, and filtering capabilities. Check if products can be properly sorted and filtered by category, price, popularity, etc. Score 0 if categorization is missing, 5 if basic categorization exists but lacks sorting/filtering, and 10 if the system includes hierarchical categories with multiple sorting and filtering options.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are the shopping cart and checkout functions complete?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the shopping cart implementation handles adding/removing items, quantity adjustments, price calculations (including the 10 yuan for 3 items pricing rule), and checkout process. Check for order submission, payment integration with WeChat Pay, and order confirmation. Deduct 5 points if pricing rules are incorrectly applied, 3 points if quantity management has bugs, and 2 points if the checkout flow is incomplete. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the barcode scanner functionality properly integrated?",
-      "description": "Check whether the barcode scanning feature uses WeChat's native camera API, processes scan results correctly, and links scanned products to the inventory system. Verify that both item lookup and checkout can be performed via barcode scanning. Deduct 5 points if the scanner doesn't properly integrate with product database, 3 points if error handling for invalid barcodes is missing, and 2 points if performance is poor. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network interruption, invalid user input, product not found, payment failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AR product preview 2. Voice search for products 3. Personalized recommendations based on purchase history). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple shopping cart algorithms) 2. Function modules unrelated to supermarket shopping (e.g., social media sharing unrelated to purchases) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down the interface). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating business logic/UI/data services), component reusability, and build process optimization for WeChat mini-program. Deduct 5 points if global state management is chaotic; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no automated testing exists for critical flows like checkout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat mini-program design principles: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual language 2) Proper component spacing and alignment 3) Professional typography system (suitable font sizes for different content hierarchy). Deduct 3 points for each UI inconsistency with WeChat guidelines, 5 points for cluttered product listings, and 5 points for poor information hierarchy. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat mini-program performance standards: 1) Page transitions under 300ms 2) Shopping cart updates reflect immediately 3) Clear loading states for network operations. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy scrolling in product lists, and 5 points for unreliable product search functionality. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/taobao-order-list-page.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1611,
-  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please use your professional knowledge to provide accurate and expert responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Create an HTML page that mimics the Taobao order list page.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic structure of the Taobao order list page implemented?",
-      "description": "Examine whether the code includes all essential components of a Taobao order list: header with logo and search functionality, navigation menu, order filtering options, order items with product images/details/prices, pagination controls, and footer. Score 0 if missing more than half of these elements, 5 if missing 1-2 key components, and 10 for complete implementation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are order items accurately represented with all necessary information?",
-      "description": "Check if each order item displays: order number, order date, store name with icon, product thumbnails, product titles, SKU attributes (size, color), price, quantity, payment status, order status (awaiting payment/shipping/delivered), and action buttons (pay/confirm receipt/review). Deduct 1 point for each missing element, with a maximum deduction of 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the order filtering and search functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Verify implementation of Taobao's typical filtering tabs (All Orders, To Be Paid, To Be Shipped, To Be Received, etc.), date range selectors, and keyword search for orders. Test if filters update the displayed orders appropriately. Score 0 if no filtering exists, 5 if only tab filtering works, 10 if all filtering options are functional.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are the interactive elements and state transitions properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if order status transitions are handled (e.g., moving from 'To Be Paid' to 'To Be Shipped' after payment), action button state changes, and hover effects on interactive elements. Check for confirmation dialogs on critical actions. Deduct 3 points if status transitions are missing, 3 points if button states don't update, and 4 points if hover effects or confirmations are absent.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as empty order lists, long product names, missing images, various screen sizes, etc.) and provide friendly error messages or fallbacks. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Order status progress visualization 2. Batch operations for multiple orders 3. Quick reorder functionality 4. Animated transitions between states). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to filter orders) 2. Function modules unrelated to an order list (e.g., product recommendation carousel) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/controller layers), code reusability for list items, and appropriate event handling. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if event listeners are not properly managed. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards and match Taobao's style?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows Taobao's characteristic orange and white color scheme, typography, and layout patterns. Check for: 1) Proper color usage matching Taobao's brand 2) Consistent spacing and alignment 3) Typography hierarchy matching Taobao's style. Deduct 3 points for each significant visual deviation from Taobao's style, 5 points for inappropriate color schemes, and 5 points for inconsistent layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast sliding, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/tech-oriented-e-commerce-website.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 456,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable. Please help me create a website for selling products, with diverse functionality, minimalist design, and a strong tech-oriented feel.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the product listing and catalog system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements a complete product catalog with filtering, sorting, and search functionality. Check if products have detailed pages with comprehensive information (images, descriptions, specifications, pricing). Score 0 if core product display is missing, 5 if basic listing is implemented without search/filter, and 10 if a complete catalog system with all features is included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the shopping cart and checkout process properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the shopping cart functionality (add/remove items, quantity adjustment, price calculation) and checkout process (address input, shipping options, payment integration). Deduct 5 points if the cart doesn't persist between sessions, 3 points if price calculations have errors, and 3 points if the checkout flow is incomplete. A complete implementation with order confirmation emails gets full 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is user authentication and account management implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the implementation includes secure user registration, login/logout functionality, password recovery, and profile management. Verify that authentication uses modern security practices (password hashing, CSRF protection, session management). Deduct 5 points for missing password recovery, 5 points for insecure password storage, and 3 points for incomplete profile management. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the responsive design properly implemented across devices?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the website is fully responsive across different screen sizes (mobile, tablet, desktop) using media queries and flexible layouts. Check if images are optimized for different resolutions and if the navigation adapts for mobile users. Deduct 5 points if the mobile experience is broken, 3 points if tablet view has layout issues, and 2 points if desktop optimizations are missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as form validation errors, API failures, network interruptions, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time product availability indicators 2. AR product visualization 3. AI-powered product recommendations 4. Dark mode toggle). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple cart implementations coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to e-commerce (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations slowing page load). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/controller layers), code organization, component reusability, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast sliding, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/uniapp-jd-app-four-pages.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1703,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the generated code is executable for demonstration purposes. Create a complete user-end source code using uniapp that mimics the JD app, implementing the following requirements:\n1. Homepage\n2. Category page\n3. Shopping cart\n4. Personal profile page",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the homepage implementation complete and functional?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements key homepage components: banner slideshow, navigation icons, product recommendations, and promotional sections. Check if data loading and rendering are properly handled (lazy loading for performance). Score 0 if the homepage structure is missing, 5 if basic layout is implemented without dynamic features, and 10 if the homepage closely resembles JD's with all core components functioning properly.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the category page correctly structured with hierarchical navigation?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of the two-level or three-level category navigation system, including primary categories, sub-categories, and product listings. Check if category data is properly structured, if navigation between categories is smooth, and if category filtering works correctly. Deduct 5 points if only a flat category structure is implemented, 3 points if transitions between categories are abrupt. Full score of 10 points requires smooth scrolling, proper caching of category state, and visual hierarchy matching JD's design.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the shopping cart functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the shopping cart includes essential features: adding/removing products, quantity adjustment, price calculation, product selection checkboxes, and checkout options. Verify if cart state persists across app navigation and if calculations for subtotals, discounts, and shipping are accurate. Deduct 5 points if quantity adjustment doesn't work properly, 3 points if price calculations are incorrect. Full score of 10 points requires all cart functions working with proper validation and state management.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the personal profile page properly implemented with user account features?",
-      "description": "Review the profile page implementation including user information display, order history, address management, and account settings. Check if the layout follows JD's design patterns and if navigation to sub-sections works correctly. Deduct 5 points if user data management is missing, 3 points if navigation to sub-sections doesn't work. Full score of 10 requires proper state management for user information, clean layout, and all essential user account features.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network failures, empty data responses, input validation) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Check for proper error boundaries and fallback UI components. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Pull-down refresh animations 2. Custom skeleton screens during loading 3. Gesture-based navigation 4. Voice search capability). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple HTTP request utilities) 2. Function modules unrelated to an e-commerce app 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations, unnecessary 3D effects). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separation of UI components, business logic, and API services), use of uniapp best practices, proper state management, and build configuration. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or if Vue component composition is poorly structured; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no consideration for multiple platform compatibility. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows JD's design language: 1) Consistent use of red as primary color with appropriate accents 2) Proper layout spacing following standard design grids 3) Professional typography hierarchy (clear distinction between titles, prices, and descriptions). Deduct 3 points for each misaligned visual element, 5 points for color schemes that don't match JD's branding, and 5 points for inconsistent visual components. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to modern mobile app standards: 1) Responsive touch feedback ≤ 100ms 2) Smooth transitions between pages and components 3) Proper loading states and indicators. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jerky animations or transitions, and 5 points for non-intuitive interaction patterns that differ significantly from standard e-commerce apps. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/uniapp-vue3-jd-product-filter-list.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1230,
-  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Uniapp Vue3 JD multi-condition product filtering list page",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the multi-condition filtering system properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements comprehensive filtering capabilities including price ranges, categories, brands, ratings, etc. Check if the filters can be combined and applied simultaneously with proper state management. Score 0 if filtering is not implemented, 5 if only basic filtering is available, and 10 if advanced features like filter history, quick reset, and saved filter preferences are included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the product list rendering optimized for performance?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if virtual scrolling or pagination is implemented for large datasets. Check for lazy loading of images, skeleton screens during loading, and proper caching mechanisms. Deduct 5 points if rendering causes noticeable lag on mobile devices, and 3 points if no optimization techniques are used. Full score requires implementing both client-side caching and progressive loading.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the Uni-App cross-platform compatibility ensured?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code uses Uni-App's conditional compilation to handle platform differences (H5, WeChat Mini Program, App). Verify platform-specific APIs are properly encapsulated. Deduct 3 points for each platform-specific issue found. Full score requires testing on at least 3 platforms with consistent behavior and UI rendering.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the implementation follow Vue 3 best practices?",
-      "description": "Assess if the code utilizes Vue 3's Composition API effectively, with proper setup() functions, reactive states, computed properties, and lifecycle hooks. Check for proper component organization and reusability. Deduct 5 points if still using Options API, 3 points if refs are overused instead of reactive, and 5 points if no reactive state management solution is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors, empty data sets, filter combinations with no results, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Voice search capability 2. AR product preview 3. Product comparison tool 4. Smart filter recommendations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple sorting implementations) 2. Function modules unrelated to product filtering (e.g., unneeded social sharing) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., heavy animations on filter changes). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating API/component/store layers), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet JD's design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows JD's design principles: 1) Consistent with JD's color scheme (main red color, white background) 2) Proper layout spacing (following JD's typical grid system) 3) Professional product card design with proper information hierarchy. Deduct 3 points for each inconsistent design element, 5 points for color combinations that don't match JD's branding, and 5 points for chaotic product information display. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Filter application response ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual feedback when filters are applied. Deduct 5 points for each filtering operation without feedback, 3 points for visual stuttering during list updates, and 5 points for confusing filter selection indicators. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/visual-agriculture-ecommerce-mini-program.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1243,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the generated code is executable for demonstration. Write code for a visual agriculture e-commerce mini-program with the following requirements: visual agriculture features, two-tier distribution system, shopping mall functionality, and payment capabilities.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the visual agriculture visualization feature properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the code implements interactive visualization of agricultural products (e.g., 3D product viewing, farm-to-table traceability visualization, growth cycle display). Verify if WebGL/Canvas/SVG is properly used for rendering agricultural products with proper lighting and textures. Score 0 if visualization is missing, 5 if only basic static images are used, and 10 if interactive 3D models or dynamic growth visualizations are implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the two-tier distribution system fully functional?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of the two-tier distribution system, including agent registration, commission calculation, tier relationship management, and performance tracking. Check if the code handles commission splits correctly between different tiers, supports invitation mechanisms, and maintains proper relationship trees. Deduct 5 points if commission calculation logic is flawed, and 3 points if the invitation system doesn't persist relationships. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are the e-commerce shopping mall functions complete?",
-      "description": "Review the implementation of essential e-commerce features: product listing with filtering/sorting, shopping cart management, order processing, user reviews, and inventory management. Test if the product search works with agricultural-specific parameters (e.g., organic certification, harvest date). Deduct 3 points for each missing core feature. Give 10 points if all features are present with agriculture-specific optimizations.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the payment system secure and comprehensive?",
-      "description": "Assess if the payment system includes multiple payment methods appropriate for a mini-program (e.g., WeChat Pay integration, wallet system), implements proper transaction states, and includes security measures like order expiration and payment verification. Check for the presence of digital signatures for transactions and proper error handling for failed payments. Score 0 if payment is non-functional, 5 if basic payment exists but lacks security features, and 10 if comprehensive with proper security implementations.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network interruption, payment failures, inventory shortages, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AR product preview in user's space 2. Seasonal agricultural calendar integration 3. Farm live streaming integration). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple product display components with similar functionality) 2. Function modules unrelated to agriculture e-commerce (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations on product pages). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating business logic/view/API layers), unit test coverage, and build process optimization for mini-program environment. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no optimizations for mini-program performance constraints are implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern mini-program design principles: 1) Harmonious color scheme fitting agricultural theme (natural greens, earthy tones) 2) Proper layout adapted for both small screens and larger displays 3) Appropriate typography system for readability (body font size ≥ 14px). Deduct 3 points for each cluttered page section, 5 points for mismatched color themes, and 5 points for poor information hierarchy. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the mini-program interactions conform to mobile UX best practices: 1) Touch response delay ≤ 100ms 2) Smooth transitions between pages and states 3) Clear visual feedback for user actions. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jerky animations, and 5 points for non-standard navigation patterns that create confusion. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}