@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.0

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/school-network-framework-semantic-ui.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1688,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be careful to ensure the code you produce is executable for demonstration. Create a network framework for a school using Semantic UI.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the school network framework architecture comprehensively designed?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements a complete school network framework including core modules: user management system (students/teachers/administrators), course management, grade management, and notification system. Check if the framework uses proper MVC/MVVM architecture patterns and includes database schema design. Score 0 if core school modules are missing, 5 if only basic user management is implemented, and 10 if all essential school management modules are fully integrated with proper data relationships.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is Semantic UI properly integrated and utilized?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether Semantic UI components are correctly implemented including navigation menus, forms, tables, modals, and grid systems. Check if custom CSS properly extends Semantic UI themes without conflicts. Verify responsive design implementation across different screen sizes. Deduct 5 points if Semantic UI components are not properly initialized with JavaScript, and 3 points if responsive breakpoints are not handled correctly. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the user authentication and authorization system robust?",
-      "description": "Check whether the framework implements secure login/logout functionality with proper session management and role-based access control (RBAC) for different user types (students, teachers, administrators). Evaluate password hashing, CSRF protection, and input validation. Deduct 5 points if role-based permissions are not properly implemented, and 3 points if session security measures are inadequate. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the data management and API integration complete?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the framework includes proper CRUD operations for school entities (users, courses, grades, schedules) with appropriate database connections. Check if RESTful API endpoints are designed with proper HTTP methods and status codes. Evaluate data validation, error handling, and transaction management. Deduct 5 points if database relationships are not properly established, and 3 points if API responses lack proper error handling. Give 10 points if fully implemented with comprehensive data flow.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid user inputs, database connection failures, file upload errors, network timeouts, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the framework includes surprise features that enhance the school management experience (e.g., 1. Real-time dashboard with analytics 2. Automated email notifications for assignments/grades 3. Calendar integration with Google/Outlook 4. Mobile-responsive progressive web app features). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple user validation logics coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to school management (e.g., a built-in games section) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations on data tables). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core school management functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating business logic/presentation/data layers), code organization, and configuration management. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if environment configuration is hardcoded without proper config files. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching consistent with Semantic UI theme (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional typography system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times) 4) Consistent iconography and proper visual hierarchy. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic layout structure. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Form submission feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Page transitions and modal animations duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance for navigation 4) Semantic UI component interactions (dropdowns, accordions, tabs) work smoothly. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual glitches during component state changes, and 5 points for hard-to-find navigation elements. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/second-grade-multiplication-arithmetic-mini-program.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 233,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Try to ensure that the code you generate is executable and can be demonstrated. I am a young teacher teaching second grade (second semester). I now want to develop a mental arithmetic mini-program for second grade (second semester). This mini-program mainly focuses on multiplication tables as its core, then includes some calculations with multiplication and division, as well as fill-in-the-blank exercises for multiplication tables. These could involve not knowing the first multiplicand and having to fill it in to calculate the product, or not knowing the product or multiplicand and having to fill it in. This mental arithmetic program needs to be under my control with certain buttons. These buttons should preferably be displayed in Chinese.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the multiplication table core functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the complete multiplication tables (1-9) with proper display and interactions. Check if the program allows students to practice, review, and be tested on the tables. Score 0 if the core functionality is missing, 5 if only basic tables are shown without interaction, and 10 if all multiplication tables are fully interactive with proper learning progression.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the various calculation exercises properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code includes different types of exercises: standard multiplication/division calculations, fill-in-the-blank for first multiplicand, fill-in-the-blank for second multiplicand, and fill-in-the-blank for the product. Check if the program generates appropriate difficulty levels for grade 2 students. Deduct 3 points for each missing exercise type. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the teacher control interface comprehensive?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code provides a teacher control panel with proper Chinese-labeled buttons for adjusting difficulty levels, selecting exercise types, tracking student progress, and managing the program flow. The interface should give the teacher full control over the learning experience. Deduct 2 points for each missing essential function. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the program include an appropriate feedback and scoring system?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code implements immediate feedback for student answers, appropriate encouragement/correction messages, progress tracking, and a scoring system suitable for second-grade students. Check if visual/audio feedback is child-friendly and educational. Deduct 3 points if immediate feedback is missing, 3 points if the scoring system is not grade-appropriate, and 4 points if there's no progress tracking. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as incorrect inputs, accidental button clicks, interruptions, etc.) and provide child-friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Gamification elements like reward badges 2. Visual multiplication representations 3. Adaptive difficulty that adjusts to student performance). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to practice the same concept) 2. Function modules unrelated to math learning (e.g., unnecessary games) 3. Fancy effects that may distract young learners. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core learning functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/logic/data layers), code readability appropriate for educational software, and maintainability for teacher modifications. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the code structure would make it difficult for the teacher to make simple modifications. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet child-friendly design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows child-friendly principles: 1) Bright but not overwhelming colors 2) Clear, large buttons with Chinese labels 3) Age-appropriate fonts and sizes (≥16px) 4) Simple, uncluttered layout appropriate for 7-8 year olds. Deduct 3 points for each visually confusing element, 5 points for inappropriate color schemes, and 5 points for text that would be difficult for second-graders to read. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction suitable for young children?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interactions are appropriate for 7-8 year old children: 1) Large, easy-to-tap buttons (at least 44×44px) 2) Forgiving interaction patterns that don't require precise movements 3) Clear visual/audio feedback for each action 4) Appropriate animation speed for children's cognitive abilities. Deduct 5 points for touch targets that are too small, 3 points for complex gestures, and 5 points for confusing navigation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/seventh-grade-west-asia-southeast-asia-quiz.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1402,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to make the generated code executable for demonstration. Please help me create test questions about West Asia and Southeast Asia suitable for seventh-grade students, along with a random question selection button. Include at least 40 questions.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the quiz system fundamentally implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements a basic quiz application with question display, answer selection/submission, and result feedback. Score 0 if there's no quiz functionality, 5 if basic questions are displayed but without answer checking, and 10 if the system includes questions, answer selection, validation, and feedback.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are there at least 40 geographically accurate questions about West Asia and Southeast Asia?",
-      "description": "Check if the code contains at least 40 unique questions specifically about West Asia and Southeast Asia. Questions should be factually accurate and appropriate for seventh-grade students. Deduct 1 point for each question below 40, deduct 5 points if questions aren't focused on the required regions, and deduct 3 points if the difficulty level is clearly inappropriate for seventh-graders. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is a functional random question selection button implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the code includes a working random question selection mechanism that presents different questions each time it's pressed. Check if the randomization algorithm ensures good distribution and doesn't repeat questions too frequently. Deduct 5 points if randomization is not implemented, deduct 3 points if it works but has noticeable patterns or repetitions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are the questions well-structured with proper educational content?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the questions cover appropriate educational content (geography, culture, history, etc.) about West Asia and Southeast Asia. Check for a balanced distribution between regions, difficulty levels, and question types (multiple choice, true/false, etc.). Deduct 3 points for poorly structured questions, 3 points for uneven regional coverage, and 4 points for lack of educational value. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as unexpected user inputs, browser incompatibilities, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Visual maps for context 2. Progress tracking 3. Difficulty adjustment based on performance). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to select random questions) 2. Function modules unrelated to the quiz (e.g., an unrelated game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/control layers), maintainability, and code organization. Deduct 5 points if global variable pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the code lacks comments or is poorly organized. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface design meet professional educational standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows educational design principles: 1) Age-appropriate visual elements for seventh-graders 2) Clear and readable text (font size ≥ 16px, sufficient contrast) 3) Logical layout with intuitive navigation. Deduct 3 points for cluttered layouts, 5 points for poor readability, and 5 points for confusing navigation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and user-friendly?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interface provides appropriate feedback and guidance: 1) Clear indication of correct/incorrect answers 2) Intuitive navigation between questions 3) Visual feedback for button clicks and selections. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for confusing transitions between questions, and 5 points if the random selection button is difficult to locate or use. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/shaanlu-elementary-english-word-quiz.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 760,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable. Please write a piece of code that can run in a web browser to help elementary school students memorize English words. The textbook used is the Shaanlu version (starting from third grade). The program should allow testing by grade level and semester, include multiple-choice questions where students select English words based on Chinese prompts, or allow typing/spelling words when given Chinese meanings.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the word database and grade-level classification system properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code includes a comprehensive vocabulary database for Shaanlu textbook (grades 3-6, two semesters each), with proper data structure design for word storage including Chinese meanings, pronunciations, and difficulty levels. Check if the grade/semester filtering mechanism is accurately implemented. Score 0 if no structured word database exists, 5 if only basic word lists are present without proper classification, and 10 if complete grade-semester hierarchy with accurate Shaanlu vocabulary is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are multiple testing modes (multiple-choice and spelling input) fully functional?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether both testing modes are properly implemented: 1) Multiple-choice questions with Chinese prompts requiring English word selection 2) Spelling input mode where students type English words based on Chinese meanings. Check answer validation logic, randomization of options, and proper scoring mechanisms. Deduct 5 points if only one mode is implemented, 3 points if answer validation is incomplete. Full score requires both modes working seamlessly with accurate feedback.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the progress tracking and learning analytics system designed effectively?",
-      "description": "Check whether the system tracks student performance including correct/incorrect answers, learning progress per grade level, weak word identification, and study recommendations. Evaluate if local storage or session management is used to maintain learning history. Deduct 5 points if no progress tracking exists, 3 points if only basic scoring is implemented without detailed analytics. Full implementation should include performance dashboards and adaptive difficulty adjustment.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are age-appropriate learning features and gamification elements integrated?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the application includes elementary school-friendly features such as encouraging feedback messages, achievement badges, streak counters, or simple reward systems. Check if the difficulty progression is suitable for young learners and includes hints or learning aids. Score 0 if the interface is purely functional without educational psychology considerations, 5 if basic encouragement features exist, and 10 if comprehensive gamification enhances learning motivation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust and handles edge cases appropriately?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common issues such as empty inputs, special characters in spelling mode, browser compatibility problems, data loading failures, and user operation errors. The application should provide clear error messages and graceful degradation. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there innovative educational features that enhance learning experience?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes creative features that boost learning effectiveness (e.g., 1. Audio pronunciation playback 2. Visual word association images 3. Spaced repetition algorithm 4. Parent/teacher progress reports 5. Offline mode capability). Add 2-3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented with a maximum of 10 points. Features must be functional, not just decorative.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant or inappropriate features for the target audience?",
-      "description": "Strictly check for three types of issues: 1) Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple scoring systems) 2) Features inappropriate for elementary students (e.g., complex statistical charts, advanced settings) 3) Distracting elements that hinder learning focus (e.g., excessive animations, irrelevant games). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core learning functions are compromised by unnecessary features.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code demonstrate good engineering quality and maintainability?",
-      "description": "Review modular design separating data management, UI components, and testing logic. Check for proper code organization, reasonable variable naming, and scalability for adding new vocabulary sets. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or no clear separation of concerns; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate exceeds 30%; deduct 3 points if the codebase is not easily extensible for additional features. Full score requires clean, well-structured code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface design meet child-friendly and educational standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the visual design is appropriate for elementary students: 1) Bright, cheerful color scheme without being overwhelming 2) Large, easily readable fonts (minimum 16px for children) 3) Clear visual hierarchy with intuitive navigation 4) Adequate spacing between interactive elements (minimum 44px touch targets). Deduct 3 points for each cluttered interface element, 5 points for poor color contrast or readability issues, and 5 points for confusing navigation that children cannot easily understand.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Are interactions smooth, responsive, and provide immediate educational feedback?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interactive experience meets educational software standards: 1) Immediate feedback on answer correctness (≤200ms response time) 2) Smooth transitions between questions without jarring effects 3) Clear visual indicators for correct/incorrect answers 4) Encouraging animations and sounds appropriate for children. Deduct 5 points for delayed feedback that disrupts learning flow, 3 points for missing visual confirmation of user actions, and 5 points for interactions that are difficult for children to understand or execute.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/shang-han-lun-tcm-diagnostic-app.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1475,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Ensure that the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Study the original text of the Treatise on Cold Damage Disorders (Shang Han Lun), and help me develop a simple Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnostic app based on the Shang Han Lun.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) diagnostic system accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the diagnostic patterns from Shang Han Lun, including the Six Stages (六经) diagnostic framework and proper syndrome differentiation. Score 0 if the core diagnostic logic is missing, 5 if basic patterns are implemented but incomplete, and 10 if comprehensive diagnostic pathways are included with accurate symptom-to-pattern mapping.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the symptom input and analysis system well-designed?",
-      "description": "Check whether the app includes a comprehensive symptom collection interface with proper categorization (e.g., pulse types, tongue diagnosis, temperature sensations, etc.). The system should use weighted algorithms to analyze symptom combinations. Deduct 5 points if critical symptoms from Shang Han Lun are missing, and 3 points if the symptom relationships don't reflect traditional diagnostic principles. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the herbal formula recommendation engine properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code correctly maps diagnosed patterns to the classical formulas from Shang Han Lun, with proper dosage calculations and contraindications. Must include at least 20 core formulas with their modifications. Deduct 5 points if formula compositions are inaccurate, and 3 points if the modification rules don't follow traditional principles. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the progression/transformation of disease patterns accurately modeled?",
-      "description": "Check whether the app models the dynamic nature of cold damage disorders according to Shang Han Lun, including the progression through different stages and transformations between syndromes. Score 0 if this core concept is missing, 5 if basic progression is implemented but lacks detail, and 10 if the system fully captures the complex transformations and transmissions described in the classic text.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as incomplete symptom input, contradictory symptoms, unusual symptom combinations, etc.) and provide appropriate guidance or clarifying questions. Code with strong robustness should gracefully handle edge cases in diagnosis, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Interactive tongue and pulse diagnosis tools 2. Historical case studies from the text 3. Visualization of the Six Stages progression 4. Personalized treatment timelines). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar diagnostic methods 2. Function modules unrelated to Shang Han Lun diagnosis (e.g., unrelated modern medical tests) 3. Fancy effects that detract from clinical utility. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core TCM diagnostic functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating diagnostic logic/view/data layers), test coverage for different diagnostic scenarios, and localization support for TCM terminology. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the code lacks proper documentation for TCM concepts. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows both modern design principles and traditional Chinese aesthetic sensibilities: 1) Harmonious color palette appropriate for a medical application 2) Proper layout with clear hierarchy of information 3) Professional typography with appropriate use of both modern and classical Chinese characters when needed. Deduct 3 points for cluttered diagnostic screens, 5 points for inappropriate color schemes for a medical app, and 5 points for poor information architecture. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the diagnostic interaction intuitive and educational?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the app guides users through the diagnostic process in an intuitive way: 1) Clear step-by-step progression through diagnostic questions 2) Educational explanations of TCM concepts 3) Appropriate visualizations of patterns and relationships from Shang Han Lun. Deduct 5 points for confusing diagnostic flows, 3 points for lack of explanations of TCM terminology, and 5 points for missing connections to the original text. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/side-by-side-translation-comparison-reading.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 735,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. I want to implement a side-by-side translation comparison for reading!",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the side-by-side translation comparison layout fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements a dual-pane layout system through HTML/CSS/JavaScript, including responsive design for different screen sizes, synchronized scrolling between source and target text panels, and proper text alignment mechanisms. Score 0 if basic dual-pane structure is missing, 5 if only static layout is implemented without synchronization, and 10 if includes advanced features like paragraph-level alignment and mobile-responsive design.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the text input and processing functionality comprehensive?",
-      "description": "Check whether the implementation supports multiple text input methods (manual input, file upload, URL fetching), proper text parsing and segmentation (sentence/paragraph level), and format preservation. Evaluate if it handles various text formats (plain text, markdown, HTML). Deduct 5 points if file upload is not supported, 3 points if text segmentation is poorly implemented. Full score requires support for at least 3 input methods with proper error handling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the translation integration and management system robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the system integrates with translation APIs (Google Translate, DeepL, etc.) or provides manual translation input capabilities. Check if it includes translation caching, batch processing for large texts, and translation quality indicators. Deduct 5 points if no API integration exists, 3 points if caching mechanism is missing. Requires proper API key management and fallback mechanisms for service failures.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are the reading assistance and navigation features complete?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes comprehensive reading aids such as text highlighting, bookmarking, progress tracking, search functionality across both languages, and export capabilities (PDF, text files). Evaluate if it provides reading statistics and customizable reading preferences. Deduct 5 points if search functionality is missing, 3 points if no progress tracking exists. Give 10 points if includes advanced features like reading speed analysis and custom note-taking.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as API failures, large text processing, network interruption, invalid file formats, encoding issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should gracefully handle edge cases like empty inputs, malformed text, and service timeouts, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the reading experience (e.g., 1. Real-time dictionary lookup on hover 2. AI-powered reading comprehension questions 3. Voice narration for both languages 4. Collaborative annotation system 5. Reading analytics dashboard). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple text processors coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to translation comparison (e.g., built-in games or social media integration) 3. Fancy effects that affect reading performance (e.g., distracting animations during text display). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core reading functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating translation logic/UI components/data management layers), proper state management, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or component architecture is poorly structured; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no proper dependency management or build process exists. The full score requires clean architecture with proper separation of concerns.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional reading application standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design optimizes reading experience: 1) High contrast text with proper background colors for extended reading 2) Typography system with adjustable font sizes (minimum 14px, maximum 24px) and line heights (1.4-1.8x) 3) Proper spacing between translation panels (minimum 20px gap) 4) Reading-friendly color scheme without eye strain. Deduct 3 points for each readability issue, 5 points for poor contrast ratios, and 5 points for cramped text layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the reading interaction smooth and intuitive?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the reading interactions enhance user experience: 1) Smooth synchronized scrolling between panels with minimal lag (<50ms) 2) Quick text selection and highlighting responses 3) Intuitive navigation controls with keyboard shortcuts support 4) Seamless switching between different view modes. Deduct 5 points for each laggy interaction, 3 points for missing keyboard shortcuts, and 5 points for non-intuitive navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/spelling-flashcards-apple-cat-dog.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1751,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Please help me create code for spelling flashcards for the words \"apple,\" \"cat,\" and \"dog.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic flashcard functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code implements the core flashcard functionality for displaying the words 'apple', 'cat', and 'dog'. Verify that each word can be shown individually as a flashcard with clear visibility. Score 0 if functionality is missing, 5 if basic display is implemented, and 10 if the implementation includes proper card rotation/switching.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the spelling practice interaction implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether users can practice spelling the words through interaction. Check if there's input validation that compares user input against the correct spelling, with appropriate feedback for correct/incorrect answers. Score 0 if no spelling practice exists, 5 if basic input exists without validation, and 10 if complete validation with feedback is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is a complete flashcard navigation system implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code includes controls to navigate between flashcards (previous/next buttons, swipe functionality, or keyboard shortcuts). Check if the navigation system handles edge cases like reaching the first/last card. Deduct 5 points if navigation is partial or buggy, and 3 points if edge cases aren't handled properly.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is there a progress tracking or scoring mechanism?",
-      "description": "Examine whether the code tracks user progress with the flashcards, such as recording correct/incorrect attempts, showing a progress bar, or implementing a scoring system. Score 0 if no tracking exists, 5 if basic tracking is implemented, and 10 if comprehensive statistics with visual representation are included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid inputs, browser compatibility issues, or unexpected user interaction patterns) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Audio pronunciation of words 2. Visual hints or images associated with words 3. Spaced repetition algorithm for word review). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to display the same flashcard) 2. Function modules unrelated to flashcards (e.g., a built-in calculator) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down card transitions). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating flashcard data/view/controller), code organization, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the code lacks comments or documentation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during card flips, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/spring-wellness-guide-march-12-2025.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1782,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Spring Wellness Guide for March 12, 2025 🌿\nSeize the golden period to nourish your liver, support yang energy, and revitalize! 🌸\n\n## ✨ Today's Wellness Focus ✨\nIn March, liver fire easily flares up and temperature fluctuations increase risk of colds! Do these 5 things to maximize your health 👇\n\n## 🍵 Nutritional Guide: Eat the right colors to stay youthful!\n✅ Breakfast: Red date and goji berry millet porridge (warms the spleen and stomach)\n✅ Lunch: Stir-fried asparagus + Chinese toon egg scramble (high fiber, high protein)\n✅ Afternoon tea: Rose and chrysanthemum tea (soothes liver and relieves stress + antioxidant)\n⚠️ Avoid: Less sour, more sweet foods; reduce lamb hot pot which can cause internal heat!\n\n## 🌳 Special Arbor Day Activity\nBetween 3:00-5:00 PM when yang energy is strongest, visit a park for brisk walking/plant greenery, breathe in fresh wood energy to help liver qi flourish~\n\n## 💤 Sleep Rules\nSleep before 11 PM! Soak feet before bed (mugwort + fresh ginger slices), paired with Yongquan acupoint massage—excellent for expelling cold and aiding sleep!\n\n## 🌬️ Wind Prevention and Anti-allergy Measures\n🌼 Wear masks and windproof jackets when going out; allergy-prone individuals should keep loratadine handy\n💦 Drink 8 glasses of water (can add honey and dried tangerine peel to soothe the throat)\n\n## 🌞 Back-Sunning Technique\nChoose 10 AM or 3 PM sunlight, turn your back to the sun for 20 minutes—supplements calcium, eliminates dampness, and boosts immunity!\n\n## 💌 Wellness Tip:\nDon't rush to reduce layers in spring! Use the onion dressing method: base layer + cardigan + jacket to handle 10°C temperature differences~\n\n#SpringWellness #ArborDayHealthAction #90sGenerationWellnessDiary #LiverQiCirculation #AntiAllergyStrategies\n\n📌 Recommended today: Drink flower tea, sunbathe your back, plant greenery\n📌 Avoid today: Staying up late binge-watching, excessive exercise, fried foods",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the wellness guide content accurately structured and properly formatted?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code properly structures the wellness guide with clear section headings, proper hierarchical organization, and consistent formatting. Check if HTML semantic elements (header, section, article) are used appropriately, and if styling provides clear visual hierarchy between main sections, subsections, and content items. Score 0 if structure is chaotic, 5 if basic structure exists but lacks semantic HTML, 10 if fully organized with proper HTML5 semantic elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are interactive wellness tracking elements implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the implementation includes interactive elements like checkboxes for daily wellness tasks, activity timers for the Arbor Day activities, or progress trackers for water consumption. Evaluate whether these elements store user progress (localStorage) and provide visual feedback when completed. Deduct 5 points if no interactive elements exist, 3 points if they exist but don't save user progress. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is there a time-sensitive content display mechanism?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code implements date-aware content that recognizes the current date (relative to March 12, 2025) and adjusts recommendations accordingly. Check if there's a countdown to the special Arbor Day activity time window (3:00-5:00 PM) and notifications/reminders for optimal activities based on time of day. Deduct 5 points if no date awareness exists, 3 points if only basic date checking is implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is there personalization functionality for wellness recommendations?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code allows users to input personal health information (allergies, health conditions, age) and adjusts recommendations accordingly. Check for preference settings that remember dietary restrictions, wellness goals, or climate adaptations. Deduct 5 points if no personalization exists, 3 points if only basic preference settings without recommendation adjustment. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as browser compatibility issues, offline usage, timezone differences affecting recommendations, incorrect user inputs) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Animation showing optimal sunbathing position 2. Interactive meridian point map for acupressure guidance 3. Seasonal ingredient availability visualization). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple date checking mechanisms) 2. Function modules unrelated to wellness guidance (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow loading). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/controller layers), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows traditional Chinese medicine aesthetics and modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (natural greens/browns with seasonal accent colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance for wellness activities timing. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast sliding, and 5 points for hard-to-find key wellness tracking functions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}