@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.0

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/star-trail-app-wechat-mini-program.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 844,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Design and Implementation of \"Star Trail\" App Based on WeChat Mini Program\n\nYou are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable whenever possible. This concerns the design and implementation of the \"Star Trail\" app based on WeChat Mini Program.\n\nThe app allows users to set habit goals (such as early rising, reading, exercising, etc.), check in daily to record completion status, generates habit formation progress charts, provides habit-related knowledge and tips, includes reminder functionality, and supports social sharing and friend interaction encouragement. Complete code required.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Habit Goal Setting Functionality",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements comprehensive habit goal setting features including habit categories, frequency settings (daily/weekly/custom), start date, end date, reminder time, and personalized icons/colors for different habits.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Check-in and Progress Tracking System",
-      "description": "Review the implementation of the daily check-in mechanism, streak counting, and progress visualization. Check if the code handles edge cases like timezone differences, backdated check-ins, or missed days properly.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Data Visualization Components",
-      "description": "Examine the implementation of progress charts and statistics visualization. Check for different chart types (line charts, heat maps, radar charts), time range selectors, and interactive elements in the visualization.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Notification and Reminder System",
-      "description": "Assess the implementation of the reminder functionality, including scheduled notifications, customizable reminder messages, snooze options, and compliance with WeChat Mini Program notification constraints.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Code Robustness",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network interruptions, permission denials, data inconsistencies) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Innovative Features",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AI-powered habit recommendations 2. Gamification elements like badges/achievements 3. Intelligent streak recovery options 4. Habit correlation analysis).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Feature Redundancy",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementations of similar functions (e.g., multiple notification systems) 2. Function modules unrelated to habit tracking 3. Fancy effects that affect performance in low-end devices.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Engineering Quality",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separation of UI components, business logic, and data layer), component reusability, unit test coverage, and Mini Program best practices implementation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Interface Design Quality",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern mobile design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching suitable for a habit tracking app 2) Proper layout spacing optimized for various screen sizes 3) Professional typography system with clear visual hierarchy 4) Accessibility considerations for diverse users.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Interaction Fluidity and User Experience",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat Mini Program best practices: 1) Responsive touch feedback 2) Smooth transitions between pages 3) Intuitive navigation patterns 4) Social sharing implementation quality 5) Friend interaction mechanisms.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/streamlit-ocr-math-solver-app.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 257,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the code you generate is executable for demonstration. You are a team of software programming masters working together on this project.\n\nUsing the Streamlit framework, build a user-friendly OCR application that can recognize various mathematical content symbols and formulas, including geometric patterns, and then have AI solve the mathematical problems through a web UI program.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the OCR functionality for mathematical content properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements OCR capabilities specifically optimized for mathematical notation (including operators, fractions, exponents, integrals, etc.). Check if it uses appropriate libraries like Tesseract with math-specific training data or specialized math OCR solutions like Mathpix. Score 0 if no OCR is implemented, 5 if basic text OCR is implemented without math optimization, and 10 if it handles complex mathematical notations effectively.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the application recognize and process geometric patterns?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code includes computer vision capabilities to identify geometric shapes (circles, triangles, rectangles, etc.) and convert them to mathematical representations. Check if it implements contour detection, shape recognition algorithms, and geometric property extraction. Score 0 if geometric pattern recognition is absent, 5 if only basic shapes are detected without proper mathematical interpretation, and 10 if it can identify complex geometric configurations with proper mathematical analysis.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the AI problem-solving component effectively implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code connects to an appropriate AI model (like OpenAI API, local mathematical solver, etc.) and properly structures the recognized mathematical problems for solving. Check if the system can handle various types of math problems (algebraic equations, calculus, geometry). Deduct 5 points if the AI component only works for limited problem types, and 3 points if it doesn't provide step-by-step solutions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the Streamlit UI functionality complete and user-friendly?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the Streamlit interface implements all necessary components: image upload, OCR result display, problem formulation confirmation, solution display, and error handling. Check if the UI flow is logical and intuitive. Deduct 5 points if critical components are missing, and 3 points if the UI flow is confusing or requires unnecessary steps. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as unclear images, unrecognizable mathematical symbols, invalid inputs, network interruptions, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time formula rendering as LaTeX 2. Image preprocessing options to improve OCR accuracy 3. History of solved problems with export functionality). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant preprocessing steps that don't improve OCR accuracy 2. Function modules unrelated to mathematical OCR or problem-solving 3. Excessive UI components that complicate the user experience. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating OCR/AI solving/view layers), error handling, logging, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if configuration isn't properly externalized. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Processing feedback indicates activity during OCR and AI solving 2) Transition animations for state changes are controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance between steps. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jarring transitions between application states, and 5 points for confusing workflow progression. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/student-id-verification-webpage.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1820,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your specialized knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Ensure that the code you generate is executable for demonstration. This is downloaded student information, and now students need to verify the information. To ensure information security, please output a web page code with functionality that requires students to enter their student ID to view their own information.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the student ID verification system properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the code implements a secure verification mechanism that only allows students to access their own information after entering a valid student ID. Score 0 if there's no verification logic, 5 if basic verification exists but has security flaws, and 10 if the verification is robust with proper validation patterns and error handling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the student information data structure well-designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code includes a proper data structure for storing student information (e.g., array of objects, Map, or database connection). Check if it includes essential fields like name, ID, major, etc. Deduct 3 points if missing critical fields, 3 points if using inefficient data structures, and 5 points if no clear structure is defined. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the information display system implemented correctly?",
-      "description": "Verify that after successful ID verification, the system properly displays only the relevant student's information. Check if the display is organized, complete, and doesn't leak other students' data. Deduct 5 points if all student data is exposed in client-side code, 5 points if information display is incomplete, and 3 points if the display mechanism has glitches. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are security measures implemented to protect student data?",
-      "description": "Assess whether appropriate security measures are in place, such as input sanitization, prevention of client-side data exposure, protection against XSS attacks, and CSRF protection. Deduct 3 points for each missing essential security feature. Give 10 points only if comprehensive security measures are implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid student IDs, empty input, special characters, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Two-factor authentication 2. Session timeout for security 3. Progressive information disclosure 4. Information edit functionality with validation). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple verification methods coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to student information verification (e.g., a built-in calculator) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/controller layers), code organization, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there are no comments or documentation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast interactions, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/student-preview-assignment-with-answer-check.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1432,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the generated code is executable for demonstration. Based on the above content, please help me create a directly runnable web page for a preview assignment where students can check their answers after completion and generate a compilation of their incorrect answers.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core preview assignment system implementation complete?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements a functional preview assignment system with question display, answer input, and validation mechanisms. Score 0 if these core components are missing, 5 if basic functionality exists with limitations, and 10 if the system has comprehensive question types (multiple choice, text input, matching, etc.) with proper validation logic for each type.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the answer checking functionality properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the answer validation system - check if it properly compares student responses against correct answers with appropriate tolerance for text-based answers (case sensitivity, whitespace handling, etc.). Deduct 5 points if the validation is too strict or too lenient, 3 points if it lacks feedback on why an answer is incorrect. Give 10 points for sophisticated validation with partial credit capabilities.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the incorrect answers compilation feature implemented effectively?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the system correctly identifies, stores, and compiles incorrect answers in an organized manner. Check if it shows the student's answer alongside the correct answer with appropriate explanations. Deduct 5 points if only basic compilation exists without categorization, 3 points if it lacks visual distinction between correct/incorrect portions of answers. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is there a complete user progress tracking system?",
-      "description": "Check if the code includes functionality to track user progress through the assignment, including completion status, score calculation, and session persistence (local storage). Deduct 5 points if there's no way to save progress, 3 points if analytics on student performance patterns are missing. Full score of 10 points requires comprehensive progress tracking with visualization of performance metrics.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as unexpected input formats, browser compatibility issues, storage limitations) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Adaptive difficulty based on performance 2. Interactive hints system 3. Visual progress indicators that motivate completion). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple answer validation methods) 2. Function modules unrelated to the assignment system (e.g., unnecessary animations) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., heavy graphics that slow loading times). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/logic/data layers), script organization, and maintenance considerations. Deduct 5 points if global variable pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the code lacks comments or documentation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic question-answer layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and intuitive?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interface interactions conform to user expectations: 1) Clear feedback when submitting answers ≤ 100ms 2) Smooth transitions between questions 300-500ms 3) Intuitive navigation between sections. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for confusing navigation, and 5 points for hard-to-find essential functions (like submit or review). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/student-table-display-with-gender-grouping.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1788,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for demonstration. Please create a webpage that displays students from this table, arranged into 6 columns with 10 people in each column. Any extra students should be grouped with students of the same gender.\nThe requirement is to be able to import this data table.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the data import mechanism properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code provides a user-friendly way to import the student data table. Check if it supports common formats (CSV, JSON, Excel) and handles parsing errors gracefully. Score 0 if no import functionality exists, 5 if basic import is implemented but lacks error handling, and 10 if the import mechanism is robust with proper validation and error feedback.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the 6-column layout correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Verify that the code properly arranges students into exactly 6 columns as required. The layout should be responsive and maintain the column structure across different screen sizes. Deduct 5 points if the layout breaks on common viewport sizes, and 3 points if the columns are not evenly spaced or aligned. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the grouping of students by gender correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code correctly groups extra students with others of the same gender. This requires proper identification of gender attributes and algorithm implementation to maintain these groupings. Score 0 if the gender-based grouping is not implemented, 5 if there are errors in the grouping logic, and 10 if the grouping works perfectly under all test cases.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the distribution of 10 people per column handled properly?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code correctly distributes students with 10 people per column and handles the remainder appropriately. The algorithm should account for the gender-based grouping requirement when dealing with extra students. Score 0 if the distribution is incorrect, 5 if there are minor issues with handling edge cases, and 10 if the distribution works perfectly for any number of students.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as missing data fields, malformed input, empty tables, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Interactive sorting/filtering options 2. Visual representation of gender distribution 3. Smooth animations for data presentation). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to parse the same data) 2. Function modules unrelated to student display (e.g., unrelated analytics) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data processing/view/import layers), code organization, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the code lacks comments or documentation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during data loading or filtering, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/student-teacher-course-selection-system.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1034,
-  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code for demonstration whenever possible. Create a web-based student course selection system with both student and teacher interfaces.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the student interface fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements all essential student functionalities including course browsing, filtering, registration, schedule viewing, and dropping courses. Check if the interface displays course details (name, code, instructor, schedule, capacity), handles conflicts, and confirms actions. Score 0 if core functionality is missing, 5 for basic implementation, 10 if complete with validation and user feedback.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the teacher interface properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Examine if the teacher interface includes course creation/editing, student roster management, capacity control, and approval workflows (if applicable). Verify that teachers can view enrolled students, manage waitlists, and export class data. Deduct 5 points if basic CRUD operations are missing, and 3 points if student management features are incomplete. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the data model and state management properly designed?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the system uses appropriate data structures for courses, students, enrollments, and schedules. Check if relationships between entities are clearly defined and maintained consistently. Evaluate state management (using context, Redux, or similar patterns) for proper data flow. Deduct 5 points for data inconsistency issues, 3 points for inefficient data structures, and 5 points for global state pollution. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is authentication and role-based access control implemented?",
-      "description": "Verify if the system implements proper authentication (login/logout) and maintains session state. Check if role-based permissions separate student and teacher actions. Evaluate if unauthorized access attempts are properly handled. Deduct 10 points if authentication is missing, 5 points if role separation is incomplete, and 3 points if session management has security flaws. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as duplicate registrations, course conflicts, full courses, invalid inputs, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Visual schedule calendar view 2. Real-time course availability notifications 3. Interactive course recommendation system based on student history). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to display the same data) 2. Function modules unrelated to course registration (e.g., a built-in chat system) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating API/UI/state management layers), component reusability, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast course browsing/selection, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/su-shi-poems-with-traditional-chinese-style.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1594,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable whenever possible. Help me create an HTML file containing all of Su Shi's poems with a traditional Chinese style background, including a table of contents, navigation for previous/next poems, pinyin for each poem, and automatic system reading functionality.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the collection of Su Shi's poems comprehensive and accurately presented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes a substantial collection of Su Shi's poems (at least 50 representative works) with accurate text, titles, and dates. Each poem should include the original Chinese text without errors. Deduct 5 points if fewer than 30 poems are included, 3 points for any textual errors found in poems, and 2 points if historical context or composition dates are missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the pinyin annotation correctly implemented for each poem?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the pinyin is accurately displayed for each Chinese character in the poems, with proper tone marks and syllable separation. Check for a toggle mechanism to show/hide pinyin. Deduct 5 points if pinyin has systematic tone mark errors, 3 points if syllable separation is incorrect, and 5 points if pinyin is hardcoded rather than generated programmatically. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the auto-reading functionality properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review the implementation of the text-to-speech feature for reading poems aloud. It should use Web Speech API or a similar technology, offer speed/voice controls, and provide visual highlighting of the current line being read. Deduct 5 points if there's no synchronization between audio and visual text, 3 points if voice controls are missing, and 2 points if the pronunciation of classical Chinese is poor. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the navigation system functional and user-friendly?",
-      "description": "Assess the implementation of the table of contents and previous/next poem navigation. The TOC should be organized by categories (e.g., by theme, chronology) with smooth scrolling. Navigation should preserve reading position. Deduct 3 points for lack of category organization in the TOC, 3 points if navigation doesn't maintain scroll position, and 4 points if there's no visual indication of the current poem in the TOC. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as browser compatibility issues, text-to-speech API failures, large content loading) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Interactive calligraphy display 2. Historical context visualization 3. Poem interpretation toggle). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple audio control systems) 2. Function modules unrelated to poem presentation (e.g., unrelated games) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow page loading). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/controller layers), resource loading optimization, and code maintenance quality. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found; deduct 3 points if poem data isn't properly separated from presentation logic; deduct 2 points if the code has poor commenting or documentation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet traditional Chinese aesthetic standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design authentically reflects traditional Chinese aesthetics: 1) Appropriate use of traditional elements (brushwork textures, scroll patterns) 2) Harmonious color palette aligned with classical Chinese painting (black, red seals, parchment yellow) 3) Proper typography using appropriate font families for classical Chinese. Deduct 3 points for anachronistic design elements, 4 points for inappropriate modern styling, and 3 points for poor readability of poem text. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to the elegance of classical Chinese scrolls: 1) Smooth scroll transitions mimicking physical scroll unrolling 2) Gentle fade-ins for poem content 3) Subtle visual feedback for interactive elements. Deduct 3 points for jarring transitions between poems, 3 points for laggy scroll performance, and 4 points if the text-to-speech highlighting creates visual disruption. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/teaching-website-7th-grade-asia-focus.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 288,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the generated code is executable when possible.\n\nHello, I am a teacher teaching 7th grade in Nanshan District, Shenzhen. Please help me create a teaching website using HTML with the following requirements:\n\n1. Include a map of Asia that displays all rivers mentioned in the textbook and labels the countries.\n2. Allow switching between subjects (Chinese Language Arts, History, Geography).\n3. In Geography mode, allow switching between topographical maps, precipitation maps, temperature maps, and climate maps. When clicking on map legends, explanations should appear (for example, when clicking on the subtropical monsoon climate zone (or its legend), it should display that the characteristic of subtropical monsoon climate is that rain and heat occur in the same period).\n4. In Chinese Language Arts mode, mark the writing locations of each text (excluding those not in Asia) and display complete information about the text (including appreciation) when clicked.\n5. In History mode, allow selection of dynasties, focus the view on China and label surrounding countries (excluding those not mentioned in the textbook), while displaying Chinese territories and key knowledge points according to the dynasty.\n6. Add a \"QR Code\" option in the top right corner that, when clicked, generates a QR code that allows direct access to the website when scanned.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Asia Map Implementation",
-      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of the Asia map feature which should display all rivers mentioned in textbooks and label countries correctly.0 points if map is missing or severely distorted, 5 points if basic outlines exist but rivers or countries are incomplete, 10 points for complete and accurate implementation with clear labeling and good responsiveness.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Subject Switching Mechanism",
-      "description": "Assess the functionality that allows switching between Chinese Language Arts, History, and Geography subjects.0 points if switching mechanism is absent, 5 points if basic switching exists but with glitches or inconsistencies, 10 points for seamless transitions with proper state management and visual feedback.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Geography Mode Functionality",
-      "description": "Evaluate the Geography mode's capability to switch between map types and provide explanations when legends are clicked.0 points if map types are missing or explanations don't appear, 5 points if basic switching exists but explanations are incomplete, 10 points for fully functional implementation with comprehensive educational content.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Chinese Language Arts Mode",
-      "description": "Assess the implementation of marking writing locations of texts in Asia and displaying complete information when clicked.0 points if location marking is absent or severely inaccurate, 5 points if basic marking exists but information is limited, 10 points for comprehensive implementation with rich educational content.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Code Robustness",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations and provide friendly error handling.0 points if no exception handling exists, 5 points if basic error handling is implemented but not comprehensive, 10 points for robust error handling with user-friendly recovery mechanisms.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Innovative Educational Features",
-      "description": "Identify any eye-catching innovative features that enhance the educational experience.Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented that enhances educational value (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Feature Redundancy Assessment",
-      "description": "Strictly check for redundant or unnecessary features that might complicate the educational experience.Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Engineering Quality",
-      "description": "Review the code architecture, modularity, and maintainability.Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate is high; deduct 5 points if resource loading is inefficient. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Interface Design Quality",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the interface design meets professional standards appropriate for educational content.Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for inappropriate color combinations for educational content, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Interactive Experience Quality",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic interactions are smooth, intuitive and support the educational purpose.Deduct 5 points for operations without feedback, 3 points for choppy animations, and 5 points for difficult-to-locate key educational functions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}