@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.0

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/half-track-vehicle-svg-image.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 51,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for display. Please help me implement this SVG image using code. Half-track vehicle.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG image of the half-track vehicle accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately represents the half-track vehicle with correct proportions and key components (front wheels, rear tracks, cabin, body structure). Score 0 if the vehicle is unrecognizable, 5 if the basic structure is present but with significant distortions, and 10 if all essential components are accurately depicted with proper scaling and positioning.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the key visual details of the half-track vehicle implemented?",
-      "description": "Check for important visual details such as windows, lights, tracks with individual track links, wheel details (spokes/hubs), door lines, and vehicle texturing. Deduct 2 points for each major missing detail. Award full points if the implementation includes nuanced details like rivets, suspension elements, and correct track mechanism visualization.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the SVG code structured efficiently?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the SVG code uses appropriate grouping (<g> elements), reusable components (via <defs> and <use>), and proper nesting structure. Score 10 if the code demonstrates optimal structuring with reusable patterns for repeating elements (like track links), 5 if basic grouping is used but with inefficiencies, and 0 if the code is completely flat with no logical organization.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the implementation technically accurate in utilizing SVG features?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code properly uses SVG-specific features such as path commands, transforms, gradients for shading, and appropriate primitive shapes. Check if complex paths use proper curve commands (cubic/quadratic beziers) where appropriate rather than excessive straight line segments. Deduct 2 points for each significant technical misuse or missed opportunity to utilize SVG capabilities.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code follows SVG best practices with proper viewBox settings, namespace declarations, and valid attribute values. Check if the SVG scales correctly across different viewport sizes. Code with strong robustness should work across different browsers and adapt to container size changes, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if basic SVG requirements are not met, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Animation of moving tracks or wheels 2. Interactive elements like hoverable/clickable vehicle parts 3. Perspective adjustments or 3D-like effects). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant path definitions that could be simplified 2. Excessive use of nested groups that don't serve a structural purpose 3. Overuse of filters or effects that impact performance without visual benefit. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core vehicle representation is obscured by unnecessary elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review naming conventions for IDs and classes, code comments explaining complex parts, separation of structure and presentation (using CSS within SVG appropriately), and overall readability. Deduct 5 points if elements lack meaningful identifiers; deduct 5 points if inline styles are used excessively where CSS would be more appropriate; deduct 5 points if the code is poorly organized making maintenance difficult. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual representation meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows professional principles: 1) Appropriate use of color and contrast 2) Consistent line weights and styling 3) Proper perspective and proportions. Deduct 3 points for inconsistent styling, 5 points for major perspective errors, and 5 points for poor color choices that impact visual clarity. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction or visual enhancement smooth and effective?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any animations or interactive elements (if implemented) enhance the visual representation: 1) Smooth transitions if animated 2) Purposeful interactions that reveal information or enhance understanding 3) Appropriate timing for visual effects (not too fast or slow). Deduct 5 points for jarring animations, 3 points for interactions with delayed response, and 5 points for effects that distract rather than enhance. If no animation/interaction is included but the static image is excellent, score based on potential for adding such features. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/hand-thumbs-up-down-icon.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 202,
-  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable and can be displayed.\nPlease help me implement this SVG image using code. A vector illustration featuring a hand with a thumbs up icon, juxtaposed with a thumbs down icon.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG structure correctly implemented with proper vector graphics?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements SVG elements using proper vector graphics principles, including correct use of paths, shapes, and coordinate systems for both thumbs up and thumbs down icons. Check if the hand anatomy is proportionally correct and visually recognizable. Score 0 if basic SVG structure is missing, 5 if only basic shapes are used without proper hand details, and 10 if anatomically accurate hands with proper thumb positioning are fully implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are both thumbs up and thumbs down icons properly juxtaposed and balanced?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether both icons are implemented with proper visual balance, symmetry, and clear distinction. Check if the positioning creates effective visual contrast and the composition follows design principles. The icons should be easily distinguishable and properly aligned. Deduct 5 points if only one icon is implemented, 3 points if the positioning lacks visual balance, and 2 points if the icons are too similar in appearance. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the vector illustration optimized and scalable?",
-      "description": "Check whether the SVG uses proper vector optimization techniques including minimal path points, efficient use of geometric shapes, and scalable design principles. Evaluate if the illustration maintains visual quality at different sizes and uses appropriate stroke-width and fill properties. Deduct 5 points if the SVG uses excessive path points or redundant elements, 3 points if scaling issues are present, and 2 points if stroke-width is not properly defined. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the implementation include proper semantic structure and accessibility?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG includes proper semantic elements such as title, description, and appropriate grouping with <g> elements. Check if accessibility attributes like aria-labels, role definitions, and meaningful element IDs are implemented. Deduct 5 points if no semantic structure is present, 3 points if accessibility attributes are missing, and 2 points if element grouping is poorly organized. Give 10 points if fully implemented with proper semantic structure.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common issues such as browser compatibility, invalid SVG syntax, missing viewBox attributes, and proper namespace declarations. Code with strong robustness should include fallback mechanisms and proper error handling for SVG rendering issues, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no error handling or compatibility considerations are present, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the visual experience (e.g., 1. Interactive hover effects with CSS animations 2. Gradient fills or shadow effects 3. Responsive design adaptations 4. Smooth transition animations between states). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant SVG elements or duplicate paths 2. Unnecessary styling or effects that don't enhance the core illustration 3. Overly complex implementations where simple solutions would suffice. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core illustration clarity is compromised by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization (such as proper SVG grouping, consistent naming conventions, and clean structure), reusability of components, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if inconsistent naming or poor code organization is found; deduct 5 points if the code structure is not modular or reusable; deduct 5 points if the SVG lacks proper documentation or comments. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual design meet professional illustration standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern vector illustration principles: 1) Harmonious color palette with proper contrast ratios 2) Consistent line weights and styling 3) Professional iconographic design with clear visual hierarchy 4) Proper proportions and anatomical accuracy for hand representation. Deduct 3 points for each visual inconsistency, 5 points for poor color choices or contrast, and 5 points for anatomically incorrect or unprofessional appearance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the SVG rendering performance optimized and display quality excellent?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG renders smoothly across different devices and browsers: 1) Proper viewBox and aspect ratio settings 2) Optimized file size without quality loss 3) Sharp rendering at various zoom levels 4) Consistent appearance across different browsers. Deduct 5 points for rendering issues or pixelation, 3 points for poor performance or large file size, and 5 points for inconsistent cross-browser appearance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/human-ear-hearing-organ-svg-image.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 115,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration whenever possible. Please help me implement this SVG image using code. The ear is the human organ for hearing and the sense of listening to sound and noise.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic SVG ear anatomy correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the primary anatomical features of the human ear (outer ear, middle ear, inner ear) through SVG paths and elements. Score 0 if only a simplified outline is created, 5 if the main visible structures are implemented, and 10 if all anatomical structures (including internal components like cochlea, auditory canal, etc.) are accurately represented with proper proportions.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the SVG paths anatomically accurate and detailed?",
-      "description": "Examine the path definitions for anatomical accuracy. Check whether bezier curves and line segments properly follow the natural curvature of ear structures. Verify that the helix, antihelix, tragus, lobule, and other ear components are accurately represented. Deduct 3 points for each significant anatomical inaccuracy, and 5 points if the proportions between different ear parts are incorrect. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the SVG rendering optimized with appropriate attributes?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code uses appropriate SVG attributes for element optimization (viewBox, preserveAspectRatio, etc.) and whether the coordinate system is properly defined. Check for proper use of groups (<g>), reusable components (symbols, defs), and efficient path commands. Deduct 3 points for inefficient SVG structure, 5 points for missing viewBox definition, and 3 points for unnecessarily verbose path commands. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the implementation include educational or interactive elements related to hearing function?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code implements educational features that explain the hearing process or ear functionality. Check for hover explanations, animated sound wave visualization, or labeled anatomical parts. Score 0 if the image is purely static with no educational elements, 5 if basic labels or tooltips are included, and 10 if comprehensive interactive educational features explain the hearing process.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle different display environments (browser compatibility, responsiveness), includes fallback options, and provides appropriate error handling for animations or interactions. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle edge cases like resizing, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no safeguards are implemented, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Sound wave visualization when interacting with the ear 2. Cross-sectional view transitions 3. Animated explanation of how sound travels through the ear). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant SVG elements or groups that could be consolidated 2. Unnecessary animations or effects unrelated to ear function demonstration 3. Excessive detail that impacts performance without adding educational value. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core anatomical representation is obscured by redundant elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating structure/style/interaction concerns), code reusability, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if inline styles are overused instead of CSS classes; deduct 5 points if the code contains duplicated path definitions that could be reused; deduct 5 points if there's no clear organization of SVG components. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual representation meet professional anatomical illustration standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows professional medical illustration principles: 1) Appropriate color scheme for anatomical clarity 2) Proper use of shading and gradients to indicate depth 3) Clear visual distinction between different ear structures. Deduct 3 points for each anatomical misrepresentation, 5 points for confusing or unrealistic coloring, and 5 points for poor visual hierarchy that makes structures difficult to distinguish. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and educational?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any interactive elements enhance understanding of ear function: 1) Transitions between different ear views are smooth (300-500ms) 2) Hover/click interactions provide meaningful information 3) Any sound-related animations accurately represent acoustic principles. Deduct 5 points for jarring or scientifically inaccurate animations, 3 points for interactions without educational purpose, and 5 points for missed opportunities to demonstrate how sound affects the ear. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/implement-spray-paint-effect-mouse-svg.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 419,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code for demonstration. Help me implement a spray paint-like effect using mouse and SVG.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the spray paint basic functionality implemented correctly?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements the fundamental spray paint effect using SVG, including random particle generation within a circular area around the mouse pointer. Score 0 if the spray functionality is missing, 5 if basic spray is implemented but lacks randomness or proper distribution, and 10 if the spray effect looks natural with proper density and dispersion patterns.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is mouse interaction properly handled for the spray paint effect?",
-      "description": "Check if the code correctly handles mouse events (mousedown, mousemove, mouseup) to create continuous painting when dragging and properly stops when released. Verify if it includes both click-to-spray and drag-to-spray capabilities. Deduct 5 points if only one mouse event type is supported, 3 points if event listeners aren't properly removed when needed. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are spray paint customization options provided?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code allows for customization of spray parameters such as spray radius, density, color, opacity, and particle size. Score 0 if no customization options exist, 5 if only basic color/size options are available, and 10 if comprehensive controls for all spray properties are implemented with intuitive interfaces.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the SVG implementation efficient and performant?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code uses SVG efficiently by examining if it: properly manages DOM elements (creating/removing nodes to prevent excessive memory usage), uses appropriate SVG elements for spray particles, and maintains good performance even with many particles. Deduct 5 points if frame rate drops noticeably during usage, 5 points if memory usage grows uncontrollably. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as rapid mouse movements, browser resize events, touch inputs on mobile devices) and provide graceful degradation or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Pressure sensitivity support for tablets 2. Texture/pattern options for spray particles 3. Undo/redo functionality 4. Save/export canvas as image). Add 2.5 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant event listeners that could cause memory leaks 2. Unnecessary calculations in animation loops 3. Fancy effects that severely affect performance (e.g., excessive particle effects). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating spray logic/UI controls/event handling), code reusability, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or proper encapsulation is not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no separation of concerns between rendering and business logic. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Clean canvas area with proper contrast between UI controls and drawing area 2) Proper layout spacing for control panels (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Intuitive iconography for spray tools. Deduct 3 points for cluttered UI elements, 5 points for poor contrast making the spray effect hard to see, and 5 points for confusing tool indicators. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the spray painting interaction smooth and realistic?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the spray effect feels natural and responsive: 1) Spray response time ≤ 50ms 2) Particle rendering doesn't lag behind cursor movement 3) Natural-looking spray dispersion pattern similar to real spray paint. Deduct 5 points for noticeable lag between mouse movement and spray rendering, 3 points for unnatural particle distribution patterns, and 5 points for jarring transitions when changing spray parameters. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/implement-svg-quill-feather-pen.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 172,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the code you generate is executable when displayed. Please help me implement this SVG image using code. Write with a quill or a feather pen, both are great tools for calligraphy and composing writing using stationery.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic SVG structure correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG element has proper namespace, dimensions, and viewBox attributes. The SVG should be properly structured with appropriate width, height, and viewBox values to ensure the image scales correctly. Score 0 if no SVG framework is provided, 5 if basic structure exists but with incorrect attributes, and 10 if the structure is complete and properly configured.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the quill/feather pen shape accurately rendered?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the geometric accuracy of the quill or feather pen. The pen should have a realistic feather shape with proper barbs, shaft, and nib. Check for path precision, curve smoothness, and anatomical accuracy of the feather. Deduct 5 points if the basic shape is recognizable but lacks details, and 3 points if proportions are incorrect. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are the visual details and texturing techniques implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess the implementation of texture and detail in the feather using SVG techniques (like patterns, gradients, or path detailing). The quill should show barb texture, shaft details, and nib characteristics. Score 0 for flat coloring only, 5 for basic gradients or patterns, and 10 for sophisticated detailing that creates a realistic feather appearance.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the calligraphy/writing effect properly demonstrated?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG includes a demonstration of writing or calligraphy, such as an ink path, written text, or a writing motion effect. For interactive versions, evaluate any animation showing the writing process. Deduct 5 points if no writing effect is shown, and 3 points if the effect is basic without realistic ink flow dynamics. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles different browsers, screen sizes, and device capabilities appropriately. SVG should render consistently across platforms with fallbacks if needed. Check for proper namespace handling, cross-browser compatibility attributes, and responsive design considerations. Score 10 points for comprehensive compatibility, 5 for average robustness with some limitations, and 0 if major compatibility issues exist.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Animation of the quill writing 2. Interactive elements that respond to user input 3. Dynamic ink flow effects). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessary path points or shapes that increase file size 2. Duplicate definitions or unused elements 3. Overly complex implementations that could be simplified. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core rendering is obscured by excessive elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular organization (such as separating definitions, main elements, and effects), proper naming conventions, and code maintainability. Deduct 5 points if element IDs/classes are poorly named or inconsistent; deduct 5 points if there's excessive repetition of code that could be grouped; deduct 5 points if there's no logical organization of SVG elements. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual design meet professional artistic standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the quill/feather pen design follows artistic principles: 1) Proper proportion and perspective 2) Harmonious color scheme 3) Appropriate stylistic choices for the era or style of calligraphy represented. Deduct 3 points for anatomical inaccuracies, 5 points for historically incorrect representation, and 5 points for poor artistic composition. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the performance and optimization of the SVG appropriate?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG is efficiently implemented: 1) Minimal path points while maintaining visual quality 2) Appropriate use of groups and reusable elements 3) Optimized file size without unnecessary precision or attributes. Deduct 5 points for SVG with excessive nodes (>500 when unnecessary), 3 points for unoptimized transformation matrices, and 5 points for neglecting to use defs for repeated elements. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/infinity-symbol-black-and-white-photo.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 83,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate can be executed and displayed. Please help me implement the following requirement using code: create a black and white photo of an infinity symbol using SVG code.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG infinity symbol correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code accurately creates an infinity symbol (∞) using SVG path elements. The path should have a mathematically correct shape with proper curvature and symmetry. Score 0 if no infinity shape is visible, 5 if the shape is approximate but has flaws in symmetry, and 10 if the infinity symbol is perfectly formed with smooth curves and perfect symmetry.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the black and white photo effect properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG includes proper filters or styling to create a black and white photo effect. This should include appropriate grayscale effects, contrast adjustments, or filter combinations that mimic a photographic feel. Deduct 5 points if only basic black/white colors are used without any photographic effects, and 3 points if the effect lacks depth or realism. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the SVG responsive and properly viewable?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG has proper viewport settings, preserveAspectRatio attributes, and responsive design techniques to ensure it displays correctly on different screen sizes. Verify that the viewBox is correctly set and all content is visible without cropping. Deduct 5 points if the symbol doesn't scale properly, and 3 points if parts of the graphic are cut off in some viewports. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are advanced SVG features utilized appropriately?",
-      "description": "Assess the use of advanced SVG features like gradients, filters, masks, or texture effects to enhance the photo-realistic quality. Check for proper use of lighting effects, shadow, or texture overlays to create depth and dimension. Deduct 3 points for each missed opportunity to use appropriate advanced features, with a maximum deduction of 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle different browser environments and whether it includes fallbacks or polyfills for cross-browser compatibility. Code with strong robustness should work reliably across modern browsers and degrade gracefully in older ones, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if compatibility issues are likely, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Subtle animation that simulates film grain 2. Interactive elements that respond to user input 3. Creative texture or lighting effects beyond simple black and white). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant SVG elements or paths that accomplish the same visual effect 2. Excessive use of filters that don't contribute to the photo effect 3. Unnecessary complexity that impacts render performance. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core visual is made unclear by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization (such as proper commenting, meaningful element IDs), optimization techniques (path simplification, appropriate precision), and adherence to SVG best practices. Deduct 5 points if element IDs are missing or non-descriptive; deduct 5 points if the SVG contains redundant path points or excessive precision; deduct 5 points if the code lacks organization or comments. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual output meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows principles of professional photography: 1) Balanced composition with proper focal point 2) Appropriate contrast and tonal range in the grayscale 3) Deliberate use of negative space. Deduct 3 points for poor composition, 5 points for flat or uniform contrast lacking photographic depth, and 5 points for awkward proportions or spacing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the rendering efficient and optimized?",
-      "description": "Judge the technical efficiency of the SVG: 1) File size is appropriate for the complexity (under 10KB for simple infinity symbol) 2) Paths are optimized with minimal control points 3) Filters and effects use efficient techniques. Deduct 5 points for unnecessarily complex paths, 3 points for computationally expensive filters that could be simplified, and 5 points for render-blocking effects that slow down initial display. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/japanese-kimono-traditional-garment.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 14,
-  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Take care to ensure the code you generate is executable for demonstration.\n\nPlease help me implement the following requirement using SVG code. The requirement is to create a: Japanese kimono is a traditional garment.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the kimono's basic structure and proportions accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the SVG code accurately depicts the fundamental elements of a Japanese kimono including the main body (hon-mi), sleeves (sode), collar (eri), and obi (sash). Check if the proportions follow traditional kimono measurements where sleeve length typically extends to ankle level and body width allows proper draping. Score 0 if basic kimono silhouette is missing, 5 if only simplified outline is present, and 10 if all structural elements are properly proportioned and positioned.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are traditional kimono design elements and patterns authentically represented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG includes authentic Japanese design elements such as traditional patterns (seigaiha, asanoha, sakura, etc.), proper color combinations following seasonal conventions, and accurate collar overlap (left over right). Check for cultural authenticity in decorative motifs and pattern placement. Deduct 5 points if patterns are culturally inappropriate, 3 points if collar overlap is incorrect. Full score requires authentic traditional elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the SVG technical implementation properly structured and optimized?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the SVG uses appropriate technical approaches including proper use of groups (<g>), paths, and geometric shapes for efficient rendering. Check if the code utilizes SVG-specific features like gradients, patterns, and transforms effectively. Evaluate if the coordinate system is well-organized and if the viewBox is properly configured. Deduct 5 points if excessive nested elements cause performance issues, 3 points if basic SVG optimization principles are ignored.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the kimono design demonstrate proper fabric draping and fold simulation?",
-      "description": "Review whether the SVG successfully simulates the natural draping characteristics of kimono fabric through curved lines, shadow effects, and layering. Check if the obi (sash) shows proper dimensional depth and if sleeve draping appears natural. Evaluate the use of gradients or shading to create fabric texture illusion. Score 0 if completely flat representation, 5 if basic draping attempt, 10 if realistic fabric simulation with proper depth and natural flow.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code can handle common rendering issues across different browsers and screen sizes. Check for proper error handling in path definitions, valid color values, and scalable design elements. Code with strong robustness should render consistently across platforms, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if major rendering issues exist, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the SVG includes creative enhancements that elevate the kimono representation (e.g., 1. Interactive hover effects revealing pattern details 2. Animated elements like flowing fabric or seasonal transitions 3. Multi-layered depth with subtle animations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant path definitions or duplicate elements 2. Unnecessary complex patterns that don't enhance the kimono representation 3. Excessive decorative elements that distract from the main subject. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core kimono elements are obscured by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review SVG code organization including proper use of definitions (<defs>), reusable elements, and clean structure. Check for consistent naming conventions, proper indentation, and logical grouping of related elements. Deduct 5 points if code structure is chaotic or lacks reusability; deduct 5 points if excessive code duplication exists; deduct 5 points if the SVG lacks proper semantic organization. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual design meet professional aesthetic standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the kimono design follows authentic Japanese aesthetic principles: 1) Harmonious color palette respecting traditional combinations 2) Balanced composition with proper negative space 3) Refined detail level appropriate for the medium. Deduct 3 points for each visually jarring element, 5 points for culturally inappropriate color choices, and 5 points for cluttered or unbalanced composition. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the visual presentation smooth and well-rendered?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG renders smoothly with clean lines and proper anti-aliasing: 1) Smooth curves without jagged edges 2) Proper stroke-width consistency 3) Clear visual hierarchy and readable details at various scales. Deduct 5 points for each major rendering artifact, 3 points for inconsistent line weights, and 5 points for poor scalability. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/keyboard-with-mouse-on-top.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 55,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure that the code you generate is executable and can be demonstrated. Please help me implement this SVG image using code: a close up of a keyboard with a mouse on top of it",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG keyboard structure accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately creates a keyboard layout through SVG elements, including proper key arrangement (QWERTY layout), key sizing proportions, and realistic keyboard dimensions. Check if individual keys are properly defined with correct spacing and alignment. Score 0 if only basic rectangles are used without proper keyboard layout, 5 if basic key arrangement exists but proportions are incorrect, and 10 if a detailed and accurate keyboard structure with proper key groupings (alphanumeric, function keys, arrow keys) is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the mouse design realistically rendered on top of the keyboard?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the mouse is properly positioned 'on top' of the keyboard with correct z-index layering and realistic mouse shape. Check if the mouse includes essential components like left/right buttons, scroll wheel, and proper ergonomic curves. Deduct 5 points if the mouse appears flat or unrealistic, 3 points if positioning doesn't clearly show it's 'on top' of the keyboard. The mouse should have proper shadows or depth indicators. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the close-up perspective and composition match the requirement?",
-      "description": "Check whether the SVG implements a proper 'close-up' view with appropriate cropping and perspective. The composition should show detailed view of keyboard keys with the mouse prominently featured. Evaluate if the viewBox and scaling create a realistic close-up effect rather than a distant overview. Deduct 5 points if the perspective is flat or lacks depth, 3 points if the composition doesn't feel like a close-up shot. Full score requires realistic perspective with proper foreground/background relationship.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are realistic visual details and textures implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code includes realistic visual details such as key legends (letters/numbers on keys), surface textures, beveled edges, and material representation. Check for proper use of gradients, shadows, and highlighting to create depth and realism. Deduct 5 points if keys lack text labels or appear completely flat, 3 points if missing essential details like key borders or realistic coloring. Full implementation should include key backlighting effects, surface reflections, and material differentiation between keyboard and mouse.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common issues such as different viewport sizes, browser compatibility, and SVG rendering variations. Code should include proper error handling for SVG elements and graceful degradation. Check for proper namespacing and valid SVG syntax. Robust code should handle edge cases like missing fonts or unsupported SVG features. Give 10 points if fully robust, 5 points if moderately robust, and 0 points if no error handling exists.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes impressive features that enhance realism (e.g., 1. Animated key press effects 2. Realistic lighting and shadow simulation 3. Interactive hover effects 4. Detailed cable/wireless indicator 5. Brand-specific keyboard/mouse design elements). Add 2 points for each well-implemented innovative feature (maximum 10 points). Features should add value without compromising the core image representation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessary complex animations that don't enhance the static image representation 2. Excessive decorative elements unrelated to keyboard/mouse (e.g., background scenery, unrelated objects) 3. Overly complex gradients or effects that cause performance issues without visual benefit. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if redundant code interferes with the core image clarity or loading performance.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization with proper SVG grouping, reusable components (defs, symbols), and clean structure. Check for proper use of SVG optimization techniques, meaningful element IDs/classes, and maintainable code patterns. Deduct 5 points if code is unorganized with inline styles everywhere; deduct 5 points if excessive code duplication exists; deduct 5 points if SVG structure is poorly organized without logical grouping. Full score requires clean, modular, and optimized SVG code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual design meet professional illustration standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG follows professional digital illustration principles: 1) Realistic color palette with proper contrast and harmony 2) Consistent lighting direction and shadow casting 3) Proper proportions and perspective accuracy 4) Clean vector art with smooth curves and precise edges. Deduct 3 points for each unrealistic color choice, 5 points for inconsistent lighting or shadows, and 5 points for distorted proportions. Full score requires photorealistic quality within SVG constraints.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the rendering performance and visual quality optimized?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG is optimized for both visual quality and performance: 1) Efficient use of SVG elements without excessive complexity 2) Proper file size optimization without quality loss 3) Smooth rendering across different screen resolutions 4) Appropriate level of detail for the intended viewing size. Deduct 5 points for unnecessarily complex paths that hurt performance, 3 points for pixelated or blurry elements when scaled, and 5 points for excessive file size due to unoptimized code. Full score requires balanced optimization.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}