@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.0

package/library/web_applications-blogs_forums/linux-forum-registration-posting.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1187,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable when possible. I need your help to create a webpage that can run on Linux, similar to a forum style, where users can register and post.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is user registration and authentication functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the code implements a complete user registration system with input validation, password hashing, and authentication flow. Score 0 if missing entirely, 5 if basic implementation exists but lacks security features, 10 if fully implemented with proper validation, secure password storage (bcrypt/Argon2), and session/token management.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is post creation and management functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if users can create, edit, and delete posts with proper authorization checks. Check for rich text support, image uploading capability, and post metadata handling (timestamps, author info). Score 0 if missing, 5 if basic implementation exists but lacks features like rich text or image support, 10 if comprehensively implemented with all features and proper authorization controls.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the database design and data persistence layer properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review the database schema design, relationships between users and posts tables, and query optimization. Expect proper normalization, indexes on frequently queried columns, and prepared statements to prevent SQL injection. Deduct 5 points if no database migrations/schema management exists, 3 points if relationships are poorly designed, and 3 points if queries are vulnerable to injection. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the forum optimized for Linux environment deployment?",
-      "description": "Check if the deployment process considers Linux-specific requirements: proper file permissions setup, compatibility with common Linux web servers (Apache/Nginx), environment configuration through .env files or similar, and process management considerations (systemd service files or PM2 config). Deduct 5 points if deployment instructions are missing, 5 points if permissions issues aren't addressed. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles common abnormal situations (such as form validation failures, database connection issues, rate limiting for registration/login attempts, and XSS/CSRF protection). Code should provide friendly error messages and recovery mechanisms. Score 10 for comprehensive error handling and security measures, 5 for average robustness with some gaps, and 0 if exceptions are unhandled.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time notifications for replies 2. Markdown or rich text editor 3. User reputation/karma system 4. Topic categorization and tagging). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple authentication methods without clear purpose) 2. Function modules unrelated to forum functionality (e.g., unnecessary analytics overkill) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (MVC or similar architecture), code reusability, documentation quality, and test coverage. Check for proper separation of concerns between frontend and backend. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate is high; deduct 5 points if no automated tests exist. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows modern forum UI principles: 1) Clean thread listing with clear hierarchy 2) Responsive design that works on mobile and desktop 3) Accessible color contrast (WCAG AA compliance) 4) Consistent typography system. Deduct 3 points for each accessibility issue, 5 points for non-responsive layouts, and 5 points for cluttered information architecture. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether interactions meet modern web standards: 1) Form submissions provide immediate feedback 2) Page transitions avoid full reloads when possible (AJAX/SPA approach) 3) Infinite scrolling or pagination for thread lists 4) Optimistic UI updates. Deduct 5 points for jarring page reloads, 3 points for lack of loading indicators, and 5 points for forms that don't preserve data on validation errors. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Blogs/Forums",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-blogs_forums/nuxt-article-editor-with-element-plus.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 924,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to make the code executable for demonstration purposes. Help me create an article editor using Nuxt 3, TypeScript, SCSS, and Element Plus under the /user directory.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Nuxt 3 project structure properly initialized?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code correctly initializes a Nuxt 3 project with TypeScript support, proper directory structure (/user path implementation), and required dependencies. Score 0 if project structure is missing, 5 if basic structure exists but lacks TypeScript configuration, and 10 if the project fully implements Nuxt 3 conventions including proper module integration.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the article editor core functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the editor implementation for text formatting, paragraph management, and content saving capabilities. Score 0 if the editor is non-functional, 5 if it has basic text input but lacks formatting features, and 10 if it includes rich text editing with proper state management, undo/redo functionality, and content persistence.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is Element Plus integration properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether Element Plus components are correctly imported, configured, and used throughout the article editor. Verify that theme customization is implemented and components follow Element Plus best practices. Deduct 5 points if the implementation lacks proper plugin registration, and 3 points if component usage is inconsistent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is TypeScript properly utilized throughout the codebase?",
-      "description": "Assess whether TypeScript is used effectively with proper type definitions for editor state, props, components, and API interfaces. Check for type safety in data handling and component communication. Deduct 5 points for any use of 'any' types without justification, 3 points for missing interface definitions, and 5 points for type assertion abuse. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as content loss prevention, browser compatibility issues, network errors during saving, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Auto-saving drafts 2. Markdown import/export 3. Real-time collaborative editing 4. AI-assisted writing suggestions). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple text formatting systems coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to article editing (e.g., a built-in image gallery unrelated to the editor) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating editor logic/UI/state management), component reusability, and build process optimization. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or composition API is not properly used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if SCSS is not properly organized with variables and mixins. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching that extends Element Plus theme 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional typography system (proper heading hierarchy, readable font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for inconsistent styling, and 5 points for poor responsiveness. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Immediate feedback when formatting text ≤ 100ms 2) Smooth transitions between editor states 3) Clear visual indicators for current editing mode. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy text input, and 5 points for hard-to-find formatting controls. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Blogs/Forums",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-blogs_forums/personal-space-with-custom-profile-and-content.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1809,
-  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, expert responses. Make sure the code you provide is executable and demonstrable. Write a complete personal space using HTML, where the avatar and nickname can be customized through popup windows. It should allow posting of videos, images, text, music and other content. The UI must be aesthetically pleasing, and the data should be stored so it won't be lost when refreshing the page.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the customization system for avatar and nickname fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the popup windows for avatar/nickname customization function properly. Check if the avatar upload supports cropping, preview, and multiple file formats (JPG, PNG, WebP). Verify if the nickname change includes validation (length limits, forbidden characters). Score 0 if not implemented, 5 if basic functionality exists but lacks validation, 10 if fully implemented with proper validation and error handling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the content posting system support all required media types?",
-      "description": "Check if the system allows posting videos (with proper player controls and format support), images (with preview and lazy loading), text (with rich text formatting), and music (with audio controls). Verify that each media type has appropriate UI elements for creation, display, and management. Deduct 3 points for each missing media type. Give full score only if all media types are supported with proper UI integration.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the data persistence implementation robust?",
-      "description": "Verify if localStorage/IndexedDB is properly used for data persistence. Check for proper data serialization/deserialization, error handling during storage operations, and automatic data recovery on page load. Examine if there's a backup mechanism or migration strategy for data structure changes. Score 0 if data is lost on refresh, 5 if basic persistence exists but has limitations, 10 if the persistence layer is comprehensive with proper error handling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the interactive UI for content creation and management well-designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the content creation interfaces (post editor, media upload UI) and management features (edit, delete, archive). Check if there are intuitive controls for sorting/filtering content and organization options (categories, tags, favorites). Deduct 5 points if content cannot be edited after posting, and 3 points if management features are limited. Give 10 points if the interface is comprehensive and intuitive.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid file uploads, storage quota exceeded, network interruption, user operation errors) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Dark mode toggle 2. Customizable themes/layouts 3. Content analytics/insights 4. AI-assisted content creation tools). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple image upload modules) 2. Function modules unrelated to personal space (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations or transitions). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/data/storage layers), organization of CSS (use of CSS variables or preprocessors), and script modularity. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no separation of concerns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast scrolling, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Blogs/Forums",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-blogs_forums/simple-forum-html.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1811,
-  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the generated code is executable and displayable. Write HTML for a simple forum.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the forum core functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements essential forum features through HTML/JavaScript, including post creation, reply threading, user authentication, and content display hierarchy. Score 0 if basic CRUD operations are missing, 5 if only basic post/reply is implemented, and 10 if complete forum workflow including nested replies, post categorization, and user profiles are fully functional.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the data persistence and state management properly handled?",
-      "description": "Check whether the implementation includes proper data storage mechanism (localStorage/sessionStorage or backend integration), user session management, and real-time content updates. Deduct 5 points if data persistence is missing, 3 points if user authentication state is not maintained across sessions. Full score requires seamless data flow and state synchronization.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the forum navigation and content organization well-structured?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the forum structure includes proper categorization, search functionality, pagination for large content sets, and breadcrumb navigation. Deduct 5 points if content hierarchy is flat without categories, 3 points if search/filter capabilities are missing. Full implementation should include sortable posts, topic tagging, and intuitive navigation patterns.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are user interaction features and moderation tools implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes user engagement features like voting/rating systems, user reputation, post editing/deletion capabilities, and basic moderation tools. Deduct 5 points if user roles and permissions are not implemented, 3 points if content moderation features are missing. Full score requires comprehensive user interaction ecosystem.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as empty inputs, XSS attacks, spam prevention, invalid user operations, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should include input validation, sanitization, and graceful error handling, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the forum experience (e.g., 1. Real-time typing indicators 2. Rich text editor with media support 3. Thread subscription notifications 4. Dark/light theme toggle 5. Advanced search with filters). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple post creation forms) 2. Function modules unrelated to forum functionality (e.g., built-in games or irrelevant widgets) 3. Excessive animations that impact usability. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core forum functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separating forum logic/presentation/data layers), semantic HTML structure, and maintainable code organization. Deduct 5 points if HTML structure lacks semantic meaning or accessibility attributes; deduct 5 points if CSS/JS code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no component-based architecture is used. The full score requires clean, maintainable, and scalable code structure.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface design meet professional forum standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows modern forum UI principles: 1) Clear content hierarchy with proper typography (readable font sizes ≥ 14px, appropriate line spacing) 2) Consistent color scheme that enhances readability 3) Proper spacing and alignment following grid principles 4) Mobile-responsive design. Deduct 3 points for poor content readability, 5 points for inconsistent visual design, and 5 points for non-responsive layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the user interaction smooth and intuitive?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the forum interactions provide excellent user experience: 1) Immediate feedback for user actions (post submission, voting, etc.) ≤ 100ms 2) Smooth transitions between forum sections 3) Clear visual indicators for new content, user status, and interactive elements 4) Keyboard navigation support. Deduct 5 points for each interaction without proper feedback, 3 points for confusing navigation flow, and 5 points for poor accessibility. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Blogs/Forums",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-blogs_forums/three-column-web-content-layout.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 996,
-  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable and displayable whenever possible. Generate three columns: first column: title list on top with image list below; second column: news list on top with image news list below; third column: two image links on top with two news lists below.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the three-column layout structure correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements a responsive three-column layout using proper HTML/CSS techniques (flexbox, grid, or appropriate responsive techniques). Check for proper containment, alignment, and spacing between columns. Score 0 if columns are not implemented correctly, 5 if the layout is functional but not responsive, and 10 if the columns are fully responsive with appropriate breakpoints for different screen sizes.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are all content components implemented according to specifications?",
-      "description": "Verify that all required components are included with the correct hierarchy: Column 1 (title list + image list), Column 2 (news list + image news list), Column 3 (two image links + two news lists). Score 0 if major components are missing, 5 if all components exist but with incorrect structure/hierarchy, and 10 if all components are implemented exactly as specified with proper structural relationships.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the content management and data structure well-designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code uses efficient data structures (arrays/objects) for storing and organizing the different content types. Check if content is properly separated from presentation. Deduct 5 points if data is hard-coded without structure, 3 points if there's no clear separation between data and presentation. Full marks require modular data handling that would facilitate easy content updates.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are the interactive elements functional and properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether links, hover states, and any interactive elements (like image carousels or clickable news items) are properly implemented. Test for event handling, smooth transitions, and proper feedback on user interaction. Deduct 5 points for non-functional links, 3 points for missing hover states, and 5 points for inaccessible interactive elements. Full score requires complete interaction implementation with appropriate visual feedback.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as missing images, long text content, empty lists, etc.) and provide fallbacks or graceful degradation. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Lazy loading for images 2. Smooth transitions between content states 3. Theme switching capability). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to display the same news items) 2. Function modules unrelated to content display (e.g., a built-in calculator) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/controller layers), code reusability, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global scope pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if styles and scripts are not properly separated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast scrolling, and 5 points for hard-to-find content navigation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Blogs/Forums",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-blogs_forums/vue-news-briefings-search-and-display.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1385,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure the generated code is executable for display purposes. I want to use Vue to design a frontend page with the following functionalities: displaying news briefings, having an input field for entering URLs, and the ability to search and display news briefings.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Vue component structure properly designed?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code properly implements Vue's component-based architecture. Check for appropriate component organization (parent-child relationships), proper props passing, and emit event handling. Evaluate the use of Vue lifecycle hooks. Score 0 if components are not used at all, 5 if basic components exist but are poorly organized, and 10 if components follow best practices with clear responsibilities and reusability.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the URL input field properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the URL input field is properly implemented with validation (checking for valid URL format), error handling, and appropriate user feedback. Verify if v-model is correctly used for two-way binding. Assess if the field includes visual cues for validation states. Deduct 5 points if URL validation is missing, 3 points if there's no error feedback, and 2 points if the input doesn't have proper UI states (focus, error, etc.). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the news briefing display functionality implemented correctly?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the news briefings are displayed in a structured way with proper list rendering (v-for) and key binding. Check if the displayed content includes essential news elements (title, summary, source, timestamp, etc.). Deduct 5 points if news items lack visual hierarchy, 3 points if there's no loading state or empty state handling, and 2 points if the layout breaks with different content lengths. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the search functionality implemented efficiently?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the search function uses computed properties or watchers appropriately for filtering news. Check for debouncing on user input, case-insensitive search, and ability to search across multiple fields (title, content, etc.). Verify if search results update reactively. Deduct 5 points if search is not optimized and causes performance issues, 3 points if the search lacks features like highlighting matches, and 2 points if there's no indication of search results count. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as API failures, invalid URL inputs, empty search results, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Check for try-catch blocks around API calls and proper error state management. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. News categorization with visual indicators 2. Reading time estimation 3. Share functionality for individual news items 4. Dark mode support). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple search methods coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to news briefings (e.g., a built-in calculator) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations on news items). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating API services, UI components, and state management), use of Vue best practices (Composition API or Options API used consistently), and code organization. Check for proper naming conventions, comments, and TypeScript usage if applicable. Deduct 5 points if global state is mismanaged; deduct 5 points if the code has high duplication; deduct 5 points if there's no separation of concerns (mixing API calls with UI logic). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Check for proper responsive design using Vue's responsive classes or media queries. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Loading states for API calls 2) Smooth transitions when filtering/searching news (using Vue transitions) 3) Clear visual feedback for user actions. Check for properly implemented animations that enhance rather than hinder the user experience. Deduct 5 points for missing loading indicators, 3 points for jarring transitions between states, and 5 points for unresponsive UI during data operations. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Blogs/Forums",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-business_website/automotive-lean-production-website.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 335,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to make the code executable for demonstration. Develop a lean production website for the automotive industry and send me the code in HTML format.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core lean production management system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements essential lean production features for automotive industry: Kanban boards, JIT inventory management, value stream mapping, and production flow visualization. Score 0 if none implemented, 5 if basic visualization only, and 10 if comprehensive lean production tools are included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are automotive industry-specific components implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes automotive-specific elements such as vehicle assembly line tracking, part inventory management, quality control checkpoints, and defect tracking systems. Deduct 3 points for each missing critical component. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the dashboard for KPI monitoring and real-time production metrics implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of real-time dashboards showing critical metrics like cycle time, throughput, defect rates, and OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness). Assess whether the visualizations use appropriate chart types and provide actionable insights. Deduct 5 points if real-time updates are missing, and 3 points if the metrics aren't industry-relevant. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the responsive design properly implemented for shop floor and management use?",
-      "description": "Check whether the website is usable across different devices (desktop monitors on factory floor, tablets for supervisors, mobile for managers). Test layout at 320px, 768px, and 1200px breakpoints. Deduct 3 points for each breakpoint with significant layout issues. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as data loading errors, form validation, offline operation capability, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AI-powered predictive maintenance alerts 2. AR-guided assembly instructions 3. Interactive process optimization simulations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple data visualization libraries) 2. Function modules unrelated to automotive production (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/controller layers), performance optimization techniques (lazy loading, code splitting), and maintainability factors. Deduct 5 points if global variable pollution is found; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no optimizations for industrial environments are implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows industrial UI principles: 1) High contrast for factory visibility (black/white/primary color indicators) 2) Proper information hierarchy (critical alerts prominent) 3) Professional typography system (sans-serif fonts, large touch targets for gloved hands). Deduct 3 points for poor visual hierarchy, 5 points for low-contrast elements unsuitable for factory environments, and 5 points for information overload without clear organization. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to industrial environment needs: 1) Fast loading time ≤ 2 seconds for critical interfaces 2) Clear state changes for machine status (running/idle/maintenance) 3) Accessible controls for touch/mouse usage with minimal training. Deduct 5 points for each key operation without feedback, 3 points for confusing state transitions, and 5 points for unintuitive navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Other-Business Web Application",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-business_website/electronic-product-homepage-intro-drivers-support.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1022,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for display purposes. Create a homepage for an electronic product that includes product introduction, driver downloads, and after-sales service.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the product introduction section comprehensively implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code includes complete product showcase functionality through HTML/CSS/JavaScript, including product image carousel, detailed specifications table, feature highlights, and comparison charts. Score 0 if only basic text description is provided, 5 if product images and basic specs are included, and 10 if interactive product demos, 360-degree views, or video presentations are fully implemented with responsive design.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the driver download functionality properly structured?",
-      "description": "Check whether the download section includes automatic OS detection, version compatibility checking, download progress tracking, and file integrity verification. The implementation should support categorized downloads (by product model/OS/version) with search and filter capabilities. Deduct 5 points if no automatic OS detection, 3 points if missing download progress indication, and 2 points if no file verification mechanism. Full score requires secure download links with bandwidth optimization.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the after-sales service system well-designed and functional?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the service section includes multiple contact methods (live chat, ticket system, FAQ search), warranty status checker, and service request forms with file upload capability. Should implement real-time chat integration or callback request system. Deduct 5 points if only static contact information is provided, 3 points if missing interactive support features, and 2 points if no warranty/service status tracking functionality.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the complete navigation and information architecture constructed?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes intuitive site navigation, breadcrumb trails, internal search functionality, and logical information hierarchy. Should implement smooth scrolling between sections, anchor links, and mobile-responsive navigation menu. Deduct 5 points if navigation structure is confusing, 3 points if missing search functionality, and 2 points if mobile navigation is poorly implemented. Give 10 points if includes advanced features like predictive search or personalized content recommendations.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as broken image links, failed downloads, network timeouts, invalid form submissions, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should include form validation, graceful degradation for unsupported browsers, and proper error handling for AJAX requests, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance user experience (e.g., 1. AR product visualization 2. AI-powered troubleshooting assistant 3. Interactive product configurator 4. Real-time system compatibility checker 5. Community forum integration). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points). Features should be functional, not just decorative.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple contact forms with same purpose) 2. Feature bloat unrelated to electronic products (e.g., built-in games or social media feeds) 3. Excessive animations that slow down page performance (e.g., unnecessary parallax effects on every section). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating content/presentation/behavior layers), semantic HTML structure, CSS organization (using methodologies like BEM), and JavaScript best practices. Deduct 5 points if inline styles are extensively used or HTML lacks semantic structure; deduct 3 points if CSS is not organized or lacks vendor prefixes; deduct 2 points if JavaScript lacks proper event handling or memory leak prevention. The full score requires clean, maintainable code with proper documentation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern web design principles: 1) Professional color scheme matching brand identity (consistent with tech industry standards) 2) Proper typography hierarchy (headings, body text, captions with appropriate contrast ratios ≥4.5:1) 3) Consistent spacing and grid system (following 8px baseline grid) 4) High-quality product imagery with proper optimization. Deduct 3 points for poor visual hierarchy, 5 points for accessibility issues (color contrast, font sizes), and 5 points for unprofessional or inconsistent branding. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interactive elements conform to user experience best practices: 1) Page load time ≤ 3 seconds with progressive loading 2) Smooth transitions between sections (300-500ms duration) 3) Responsive hover states and click feedback ≤ 100ms 4) Intuitive form interactions with real-time validation 5) Mobile touch interactions optimized for finger navigation. Deduct 5 points for slow page loading, 3 points for missing interaction feedback, 3 points for poor mobile touch experience, and 2 points for jerky animations or transitions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Business Website",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}