casadi 3.7.2__cp314-none-manylinux2014_x86_64.whl

casadi/include/eigen3/Eigen/src/Core/arch/Default/GenericPacketMathFunctions.h

@@ -0,0 +1,1649 @@
+// This file is part of Eigen, a lightweight C++ template library
+// for linear algebra.
+//
+// Copyright (C) 2007 Julien Pommier
+// Copyright (C) 2014 Pedro Gonnet (pedro.gonnet@gmail.com)
+// Copyright (C) 2009-2019 Gael Guennebaud <gael.guennebaud@inria.fr>
+//
+// This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla
+// Public License v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed
+// with this file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
+
+/* The exp and log functions of this file initially come from
+ * Julien Pommier's sse math library: http://gruntthepeon.free.fr/ssemath/
+ */
+
+#ifndef EIGEN_ARCH_GENERIC_PACKET_MATH_FUNCTIONS_H
+#define EIGEN_ARCH_GENERIC_PACKET_MATH_FUNCTIONS_H
+
+namespace Eigen {
+namespace internal {
+
+// Creates a Scalar integer type with same bit-width.
+template<typename T> struct make_integer;
+template<> struct make_integer<float>    { typedef numext::int32_t type; };
+template<> struct make_integer<double>   { typedef numext::int64_t type; };
+template<> struct make_integer<half>     { typedef numext::int16_t type; };
+template<> struct make_integer<bfloat16> { typedef numext::int16_t type; };
+
+template<typename Packet> EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE EIGEN_DEVICE_FUNC  
+Packet pfrexp_generic_get_biased_exponent(const Packet& a) {
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type Scalar;
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::integer_packet PacketI;
+  enum { mantissa_bits = numext::numeric_limits<Scalar>::digits - 1};
+  return pcast<PacketI, Packet>(plogical_shift_right<mantissa_bits>(preinterpret<PacketI>(pabs(a))));
+}
+
+// Safely applies frexp, correctly handles denormals.
+// Assumes IEEE floating point format.
+template<typename Packet> EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE EIGEN_DEVICE_FUNC
+Packet pfrexp_generic(const Packet& a, Packet& exponent) {
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type Scalar;
+  typedef typename make_unsigned<typename make_integer<Scalar>::type>::type ScalarUI;
+  enum {
+    TotalBits = sizeof(Scalar) * CHAR_BIT,
+    MantissaBits = numext::numeric_limits<Scalar>::digits - 1,
+    ExponentBits = int(TotalBits) - int(MantissaBits) - 1
+  };
+
+  EIGEN_CONSTEXPR ScalarUI scalar_sign_mantissa_mask = 
+      ~(((ScalarUI(1) << int(ExponentBits)) - ScalarUI(1)) << int(MantissaBits)); // ~0x7f800000
+  const Packet sign_mantissa_mask = pset1frombits<Packet>(static_cast<ScalarUI>(scalar_sign_mantissa_mask)); 
+  const Packet half = pset1<Packet>(Scalar(0.5));
+  const Packet zero = pzero(a);
+  const Packet normal_min = pset1<Packet>((numext::numeric_limits<Scalar>::min)()); // Minimum normal value, 2^-126
+  
+  // To handle denormals, normalize by multiplying by 2^(int(MantissaBits)+1).
+  const Packet is_denormal = pcmp_lt(pabs(a), normal_min);
+  EIGEN_CONSTEXPR ScalarUI scalar_normalization_offset = ScalarUI(int(MantissaBits) + 1); // 24
+  // The following cannot be constexpr because bfloat16(uint16_t) is not constexpr.
+  const Scalar scalar_normalization_factor = Scalar(ScalarUI(1) << int(scalar_normalization_offset)); // 2^24
+  const Packet normalization_factor = pset1<Packet>(scalar_normalization_factor);  
+  const Packet normalized_a = pselect(is_denormal, pmul(a, normalization_factor), a);
+  
+  // Determine exponent offset: -126 if normal, -126-24 if denormal
+  const Scalar scalar_exponent_offset = -Scalar((ScalarUI(1)<<(int(ExponentBits)-1)) - ScalarUI(2)); // -126
+  Packet exponent_offset = pset1<Packet>(scalar_exponent_offset);
+  const Packet normalization_offset = pset1<Packet>(-Scalar(scalar_normalization_offset)); // -24
+  exponent_offset = pselect(is_denormal, padd(exponent_offset, normalization_offset), exponent_offset);
+  
+  // Determine exponent and mantissa from normalized_a.
+  exponent = pfrexp_generic_get_biased_exponent(normalized_a);
+  // Zero, Inf and NaN return 'a' unmodified, exponent is zero
+  // (technically the exponent is unspecified for inf/NaN, but GCC/Clang set it to zero)
+  const Scalar scalar_non_finite_exponent = Scalar((ScalarUI(1) << int(ExponentBits)) - ScalarUI(1));  // 255
+  const Packet non_finite_exponent = pset1<Packet>(scalar_non_finite_exponent);
+  const Packet is_zero_or_not_finite = por(pcmp_eq(a, zero), pcmp_eq(exponent, non_finite_exponent));
+  const Packet m = pselect(is_zero_or_not_finite, a, por(pand(normalized_a, sign_mantissa_mask), half));
+  exponent = pselect(is_zero_or_not_finite, zero, padd(exponent, exponent_offset));  
+  return m;
+}
+
+// Safely applies ldexp, correctly handles overflows, underflows and denormals.
+// Assumes IEEE floating point format.
+template<typename Packet> EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE EIGEN_DEVICE_FUNC
+Packet pldexp_generic(const Packet& a, const Packet& exponent) {
+  // We want to return a * 2^exponent, allowing for all possible integer
+  // exponents without overflowing or underflowing in intermediate
+  // computations.
+  //
+  // Since 'a' and the output can be denormal, the maximum range of 'exponent'
+  // to consider for a float is:
+  //   -255-23 -> 255+23
+  // Below -278 any finite float 'a' will become zero, and above +278 any
+  // finite float will become inf, including when 'a' is the smallest possible 
+  // denormal.
+  //
+  // Unfortunately, 2^(278) cannot be represented using either one or two
+  // finite normal floats, so we must split the scale factor into at least
+  // three parts. It turns out to be faster to split 'exponent' into four
+  // factors, since [exponent>>2] is much faster to compute that [exponent/3].
+  //
+  // Set e = min(max(exponent, -278), 278);
+  //     b = floor(e/4);
+  //   out = ((((a * 2^(b)) * 2^(b)) * 2^(b)) * 2^(e-3*b))
+  //
+  // This will avoid any intermediate overflows and correctly handle 0, inf,
+  // NaN cases.
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::integer_packet PacketI;
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type Scalar;
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<PacketI>::type ScalarI;
+  enum {
+    TotalBits = sizeof(Scalar) * CHAR_BIT,
+    MantissaBits = numext::numeric_limits<Scalar>::digits - 1,
+    ExponentBits = int(TotalBits) - int(MantissaBits) - 1
+  };
+
+  const Packet max_exponent = pset1<Packet>(Scalar((ScalarI(1)<<int(ExponentBits)) + ScalarI(int(MantissaBits) - 1)));  // 278
+  const PacketI bias = pset1<PacketI>((ScalarI(1)<<(int(ExponentBits)-1)) - ScalarI(1));  // 127
+  const PacketI e = pcast<Packet, PacketI>(pmin(pmax(exponent, pnegate(max_exponent)), max_exponent));
+  PacketI b = parithmetic_shift_right<2>(e); // floor(e/4);
+  Packet c = preinterpret<Packet>(plogical_shift_left<int(MantissaBits)>(padd(b, bias)));  // 2^b
+  Packet out = pmul(pmul(pmul(a, c), c), c);  // a * 2^(3b)
+  b = psub(psub(psub(e, b), b), b); // e - 3b
+  c = preinterpret<Packet>(plogical_shift_left<int(MantissaBits)>(padd(b, bias)));  // 2^(e-3*b)
+  out = pmul(out, c);
+  return out;
+}
+
+// Explicitly multiplies 
+//    a * (2^e)
+// clamping e to the range
+// [NumTraits<Scalar>::min_exponent()-2, NumTraits<Scalar>::max_exponent()]
+//
+// This is approx 7x faster than pldexp_impl, but will prematurely over/underflow
+// if 2^e doesn't fit into a normal floating-point Scalar.
+//
+// Assumes IEEE floating point format
+template<typename Packet>
+struct pldexp_fast_impl {
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::integer_packet PacketI;
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type Scalar;
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<PacketI>::type ScalarI;
+  enum {
+    TotalBits = sizeof(Scalar) * CHAR_BIT,
+    MantissaBits = numext::numeric_limits<Scalar>::digits - 1,
+    ExponentBits = int(TotalBits) - int(MantissaBits) - 1
+  };
+  
+  static EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE EIGEN_DEVICE_FUNC
+  Packet run(const Packet& a, const Packet& exponent) {
+    const Packet bias = pset1<Packet>(Scalar((ScalarI(1)<<(int(ExponentBits)-1)) - ScalarI(1)));  // 127
+    const Packet limit = pset1<Packet>(Scalar((ScalarI(1)<<int(ExponentBits)) - ScalarI(1)));     // 255
+    // restrict biased exponent between 0 and 255 for float.
+    const PacketI e = pcast<Packet, PacketI>(pmin(pmax(padd(exponent, bias), pzero(limit)), limit)); // exponent + 127
+    // return a * (2^e)
+    return pmul(a, preinterpret<Packet>(plogical_shift_left<int(MantissaBits)>(e)));
+  }
+};
+
+// Natural or base 2 logarithm.
+// Computes log(x) as log(2^e * m) = C*e + log(m), where the constant C =log(2)
+// and m is in the range [sqrt(1/2),sqrt(2)). In this range, the logarithm can
+// be easily approximated by a polynomial centered on m=1 for stability.
+// TODO(gonnet): Further reduce the interval allowing for lower-degree
+//               polynomial interpolants -> ... -> profit!
+template <typename Packet, bool base2>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+Packet plog_impl_float(const Packet _x)
+{
+  Packet x = _x;
+
+  const Packet cst_1              = pset1<Packet>(1.0f);
+  const Packet cst_neg_half       = pset1<Packet>(-0.5f);
+  // The smallest non denormalized float number.
+  const Packet cst_min_norm_pos   = pset1frombits<Packet>( 0x00800000u);
+  const Packet cst_minus_inf      = pset1frombits<Packet>( 0xff800000u);
+  const Packet cst_pos_inf        = pset1frombits<Packet>( 0x7f800000u);
+
+  // Polynomial coefficients.
+  const Packet cst_cephes_SQRTHF = pset1<Packet>(0.707106781186547524f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p0 = pset1<Packet>(7.0376836292E-2f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p1 = pset1<Packet>(-1.1514610310E-1f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p2 = pset1<Packet>(1.1676998740E-1f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p3 = pset1<Packet>(-1.2420140846E-1f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p4 = pset1<Packet>(+1.4249322787E-1f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p5 = pset1<Packet>(-1.6668057665E-1f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p6 = pset1<Packet>(+2.0000714765E-1f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p7 = pset1<Packet>(-2.4999993993E-1f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p8 = pset1<Packet>(+3.3333331174E-1f);
+
+  // Truncate input values to the minimum positive normal.
+  x = pmax(x, cst_min_norm_pos);
+
+  Packet e;
+  // extract significant in the range [0.5,1) and exponent
+  x = pfrexp(x,e);
+
+  // part2: Shift the inputs from the range [0.5,1) to [sqrt(1/2),sqrt(2))
+  // and shift by -1. The values are then centered around 0, which improves
+  // the stability of the polynomial evaluation.
+  //   if( x < SQRTHF ) {
+  //     e -= 1;
+  //     x = x + x - 1.0;
+  //   } else { x = x - 1.0; }
+  Packet mask = pcmp_lt(x, cst_cephes_SQRTHF);
+  Packet tmp = pand(x, mask);
+  x = psub(x, cst_1);
+  e = psub(e, pand(cst_1, mask));
+  x = padd(x, tmp);
+
+  Packet x2 = pmul(x, x);
+  Packet x3 = pmul(x2, x);
+
+  // Evaluate the polynomial approximant of degree 8 in three parts, probably
+  // to improve instruction-level parallelism.
+  Packet y, y1, y2;
+  y  = pmadd(cst_cephes_log_p0, x, cst_cephes_log_p1);
+  y1 = pmadd(cst_cephes_log_p3, x, cst_cephes_log_p4);
+  y2 = pmadd(cst_cephes_log_p6, x, cst_cephes_log_p7);
+  y  = pmadd(y, x, cst_cephes_log_p2);
+  y1 = pmadd(y1, x, cst_cephes_log_p5);
+  y2 = pmadd(y2, x, cst_cephes_log_p8);
+  y  = pmadd(y, x3, y1);
+  y  = pmadd(y, x3, y2);
+  y  = pmul(y, x3);
+
+  y = pmadd(cst_neg_half, x2, y);
+  x = padd(x, y);
+
+  // Add the logarithm of the exponent back to the result of the interpolation.
+  if (base2) {
+    const Packet cst_log2e = pset1<Packet>(static_cast<float>(EIGEN_LOG2E));
+    x = pmadd(x, cst_log2e, e);
+  } else {
+    const Packet cst_ln2 = pset1<Packet>(static_cast<float>(EIGEN_LN2));
+    x = pmadd(e, cst_ln2, x);
+  }
+
+  Packet invalid_mask = pcmp_lt_or_nan(_x, pzero(_x));
+  Packet iszero_mask  = pcmp_eq(_x,pzero(_x));
+  Packet pos_inf_mask = pcmp_eq(_x,cst_pos_inf);
+  // Filter out invalid inputs, i.e.:
+  //  - negative arg will be NAN
+  //  - 0 will be -INF
+  //  - +INF will be +INF
+  return pselect(iszero_mask, cst_minus_inf,
+                              por(pselect(pos_inf_mask,cst_pos_inf,x), invalid_mask));
+}
+
+template <typename Packet>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+Packet plog_float(const Packet _x)
+{
+  return plog_impl_float<Packet, /* base2 */ false>(_x);
+}
+
+template <typename Packet>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+Packet plog2_float(const Packet _x)
+{
+  return plog_impl_float<Packet, /* base2 */ true>(_x);
+}
+
+/* Returns the base e (2.718...) or base 2 logarithm of x.
+ * The argument is separated into its exponent and fractional parts.
+ * The logarithm of the fraction in the interval [sqrt(1/2), sqrt(2)],
+ * is approximated by
+ *
+ *     log(1+x) = x - 0.5 x**2 + x**3 P(x)/Q(x).
+ *
+ * for more detail see: http://www.netlib.org/cephes/
+ */
+template <typename Packet, bool base2>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+Packet plog_impl_double(const Packet _x)
+{
+  Packet x = _x;
+
+  const Packet cst_1              = pset1<Packet>(1.0);
+  const Packet cst_neg_half       = pset1<Packet>(-0.5);
+  // The smallest non denormalized double.
+  const Packet cst_min_norm_pos   = pset1frombits<Packet>( static_cast<uint64_t>(0x0010000000000000ull));
+  const Packet cst_minus_inf      = pset1frombits<Packet>( static_cast<uint64_t>(0xfff0000000000000ull));
+  const Packet cst_pos_inf        = pset1frombits<Packet>( static_cast<uint64_t>(0x7ff0000000000000ull));
+
+
+ // Polynomial Coefficients for log(1+x) = x - x**2/2 + x**3 P(x)/Q(x)
+ //                             1/sqrt(2) <= x < sqrt(2)
+  const Packet cst_cephes_SQRTHF = pset1<Packet>(0.70710678118654752440E0);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p0 = pset1<Packet>(1.01875663804580931796E-4);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p1 = pset1<Packet>(4.97494994976747001425E-1);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p2 = pset1<Packet>(4.70579119878881725854E0);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p3 = pset1<Packet>(1.44989225341610930846E1);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p4 = pset1<Packet>(1.79368678507819816313E1);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_p5 = pset1<Packet>(7.70838733755885391666E0);
+
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_q0 = pset1<Packet>(1.0);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_q1 = pset1<Packet>(1.12873587189167450590E1);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_q2 = pset1<Packet>(4.52279145837532221105E1);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_q3 = pset1<Packet>(8.29875266912776603211E1);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_q4 = pset1<Packet>(7.11544750618563894466E1);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_log_q5 = pset1<Packet>(2.31251620126765340583E1);
+
+  // Truncate input values to the minimum positive normal.
+  x = pmax(x, cst_min_norm_pos);
+
+  Packet e;
+  // extract significant in the range [0.5,1) and exponent
+  x = pfrexp(x,e);
+  
+  // Shift the inputs from the range [0.5,1) to [sqrt(1/2),sqrt(2))
+  // and shift by -1. The values are then centered around 0, which improves
+  // the stability of the polynomial evaluation.
+  //   if( x < SQRTHF ) {
+  //     e -= 1;
+  //     x = x + x - 1.0;
+  //   } else { x = x - 1.0; }
+  Packet mask = pcmp_lt(x, cst_cephes_SQRTHF);
+  Packet tmp = pand(x, mask);
+  x = psub(x, cst_1);
+  e = psub(e, pand(cst_1, mask));
+  x = padd(x, tmp);
+
+  Packet x2 = pmul(x, x);
+  Packet x3 = pmul(x2, x);
+
+  // Evaluate the polynomial approximant , probably to improve instruction-level parallelism.
+  // y = x - 0.5*x^2 + x^3 * polevl( x, P, 5 ) / p1evl( x, Q, 5 ) );
+  Packet y, y1, y_;
+  y  = pmadd(cst_cephes_log_p0, x, cst_cephes_log_p1);
+  y1 = pmadd(cst_cephes_log_p3, x, cst_cephes_log_p4);
+  y  = pmadd(y, x, cst_cephes_log_p2);
+  y1 = pmadd(y1, x, cst_cephes_log_p5);
+  y_ = pmadd(y, x3, y1);
+
+  y  = pmadd(cst_cephes_log_q0, x, cst_cephes_log_q1);
+  y1 = pmadd(cst_cephes_log_q3, x, cst_cephes_log_q4);
+  y  = pmadd(y, x, cst_cephes_log_q2);
+  y1 = pmadd(y1, x, cst_cephes_log_q5);
+  y  = pmadd(y, x3, y1);
+
+  y_ = pmul(y_, x3);
+  y  = pdiv(y_, y);
+
+  y = pmadd(cst_neg_half, x2, y);
+  x = padd(x, y);
+
+  // Add the logarithm of the exponent back to the result of the interpolation.
+  if (base2) {
+    const Packet cst_log2e = pset1<Packet>(static_cast<double>(EIGEN_LOG2E));
+    x = pmadd(x, cst_log2e, e);
+  } else {
+    const Packet cst_ln2 = pset1<Packet>(static_cast<double>(EIGEN_LN2));
+    x = pmadd(e, cst_ln2, x);
+  }
+
+  Packet invalid_mask = pcmp_lt_or_nan(_x, pzero(_x));
+  Packet iszero_mask  = pcmp_eq(_x,pzero(_x));
+  Packet pos_inf_mask = pcmp_eq(_x,cst_pos_inf);
+  // Filter out invalid inputs, i.e.:
+  //  - negative arg will be NAN
+  //  - 0 will be -INF
+  //  - +INF will be +INF
+  return pselect(iszero_mask, cst_minus_inf,
+                              por(pselect(pos_inf_mask,cst_pos_inf,x), invalid_mask));
+}
+
+template <typename Packet>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+Packet plog_double(const Packet _x)
+{
+  return plog_impl_double<Packet, /* base2 */ false>(_x);
+}
+
+template <typename Packet>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+Packet plog2_double(const Packet _x)
+{
+  return plog_impl_double<Packet, /* base2 */ true>(_x);
+}
+
+/** \internal \returns log(1 + x) computed using W. Kahan's formula.
+    See: http://www.plunk.org/~hatch/rightway.php
+ */
+template<typename Packet>
+Packet generic_plog1p(const Packet& x)
+{
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type ScalarType;
+  const Packet one = pset1<Packet>(ScalarType(1));
+  Packet xp1 = padd(x, one);
+  Packet small_mask = pcmp_eq(xp1, one);
+  Packet log1 = plog(xp1);
+  Packet inf_mask = pcmp_eq(xp1, log1);
+  Packet log_large = pmul(x, pdiv(log1, psub(xp1, one)));
+  return pselect(por(small_mask, inf_mask), x, log_large);
+}
+
+/** \internal \returns exp(x)-1 computed using W. Kahan's formula.
+    See: http://www.plunk.org/~hatch/rightway.php
+ */
+template<typename Packet>
+Packet generic_expm1(const Packet& x)
+{
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type ScalarType;
+  const Packet one = pset1<Packet>(ScalarType(1));
+  const Packet neg_one = pset1<Packet>(ScalarType(-1));
+  Packet u = pexp(x);
+  Packet one_mask = pcmp_eq(u, one);
+  Packet u_minus_one = psub(u, one);
+  Packet neg_one_mask = pcmp_eq(u_minus_one, neg_one);
+  Packet logu = plog(u);
+  // The following comparison is to catch the case where
+  // exp(x) = +inf. It is written in this way to avoid having
+  // to form the constant +inf, which depends on the packet
+  // type.
+  Packet pos_inf_mask = pcmp_eq(logu, u);
+  Packet expm1 = pmul(u_minus_one, pdiv(x, logu));
+  expm1 = pselect(pos_inf_mask, u, expm1);
+  return pselect(one_mask,
+                 x,
+                 pselect(neg_one_mask,
+                         neg_one,
+                         expm1));
+}
+
+
+// Exponential function. Works by writing "x = m*log(2) + r" where
+// "m = floor(x/log(2)+1/2)" and "r" is the remainder. The result is then
+// "exp(x) = 2^m*exp(r)" where exp(r) is in the range [-1,1).
+template <typename Packet>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+Packet pexp_float(const Packet _x)
+{
+  const Packet cst_1      = pset1<Packet>(1.0f);
+  const Packet cst_half   = pset1<Packet>(0.5f);
+  const Packet cst_exp_hi = pset1<Packet>( 88.723f);
+  const Packet cst_exp_lo = pset1<Packet>(-88.723f);
+
+  const Packet cst_cephes_LOG2EF = pset1<Packet>(1.44269504088896341f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_p0 = pset1<Packet>(1.9875691500E-4f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_p1 = pset1<Packet>(1.3981999507E-3f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_p2 = pset1<Packet>(8.3334519073E-3f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_p3 = pset1<Packet>(4.1665795894E-2f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_p4 = pset1<Packet>(1.6666665459E-1f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_p5 = pset1<Packet>(5.0000001201E-1f);
+
+  // Clamp x.
+  Packet x = pmax(pmin(_x, cst_exp_hi), cst_exp_lo);
+
+  // Express exp(x) as exp(m*ln(2) + r), start by extracting
+  // m = floor(x/ln(2) + 0.5).
+  Packet m = pfloor(pmadd(x, cst_cephes_LOG2EF, cst_half));
+
+  // Get r = x - m*ln(2). If no FMA instructions are available, m*ln(2) is
+  // subtracted out in two parts, m*C1+m*C2 = m*ln(2), to avoid accumulating
+  // truncation errors.
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_C1 = pset1<Packet>(-0.693359375f);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_C2 = pset1<Packet>(2.12194440e-4f);
+  Packet r = pmadd(m, cst_cephes_exp_C1, x);
+  r = pmadd(m, cst_cephes_exp_C2, r);
+
+  Packet r2 = pmul(r, r);
+  Packet r3 = pmul(r2, r);
+
+  // Evaluate the polynomial approximant,improved by instruction-level parallelism.
+  Packet y, y1, y2;
+  y  = pmadd(cst_cephes_exp_p0, r, cst_cephes_exp_p1);
+  y1 = pmadd(cst_cephes_exp_p3, r, cst_cephes_exp_p4);
+  y2 = padd(r, cst_1);
+  y  = pmadd(y, r, cst_cephes_exp_p2);
+  y1 = pmadd(y1, r, cst_cephes_exp_p5);
+  y  = pmadd(y, r3, y1);
+  y  = pmadd(y, r2, y2);
+
+  // Return 2^m * exp(r).
+  // TODO: replace pldexp with faster implementation since y in [-1, 1).
+  return pmax(pldexp(y,m), _x);
+}
+
+template <typename Packet>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+Packet pexp_double(const Packet _x)
+{
+  Packet x = _x;
+
+  const Packet cst_1 = pset1<Packet>(1.0);
+  const Packet cst_2 = pset1<Packet>(2.0);
+  const Packet cst_half = pset1<Packet>(0.5);
+
+  const Packet cst_exp_hi = pset1<Packet>(709.784);
+  const Packet cst_exp_lo = pset1<Packet>(-709.784);
+
+  const Packet cst_cephes_LOG2EF = pset1<Packet>(1.4426950408889634073599);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_p0 = pset1<Packet>(1.26177193074810590878e-4);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_p1 = pset1<Packet>(3.02994407707441961300e-2);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_p2 = pset1<Packet>(9.99999999999999999910e-1);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_q0 = pset1<Packet>(3.00198505138664455042e-6);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_q1 = pset1<Packet>(2.52448340349684104192e-3);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_q2 = pset1<Packet>(2.27265548208155028766e-1);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_q3 = pset1<Packet>(2.00000000000000000009e0);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_C1 = pset1<Packet>(0.693145751953125);
+  const Packet cst_cephes_exp_C2 = pset1<Packet>(1.42860682030941723212e-6);
+
+  Packet tmp, fx;
+
+  // clamp x
+  x = pmax(pmin(x, cst_exp_hi), cst_exp_lo);
+  // Express exp(x) as exp(g + n*log(2)).
+  fx = pmadd(cst_cephes_LOG2EF, x, cst_half);
+
+  // Get the integer modulus of log(2), i.e. the "n" described above.
+  fx = pfloor(fx);
+
+  // Get the remainder modulo log(2), i.e. the "g" described above. Subtract
+  // n*log(2) out in two steps, i.e. n*C1 + n*C2, C1+C2=log2 to get the last
+  // digits right.
+  tmp = pmul(fx, cst_cephes_exp_C1);
+  Packet z = pmul(fx, cst_cephes_exp_C2);
+  x = psub(x, tmp);
+  x = psub(x, z);
+
+  Packet x2 = pmul(x, x);
+
+  // Evaluate the numerator polynomial of the rational interpolant.
+  Packet px = cst_cephes_exp_p0;
+  px = pmadd(px, x2, cst_cephes_exp_p1);
+  px = pmadd(px, x2, cst_cephes_exp_p2);
+  px = pmul(px, x);
+
+  // Evaluate the denominator polynomial of the rational interpolant.
+  Packet qx = cst_cephes_exp_q0;
+  qx = pmadd(qx, x2, cst_cephes_exp_q1);
+  qx = pmadd(qx, x2, cst_cephes_exp_q2);
+  qx = pmadd(qx, x2, cst_cephes_exp_q3);
+
+  // I don't really get this bit, copied from the SSE2 routines, so...
+  // TODO(gonnet): Figure out what is going on here, perhaps find a better
+  // rational interpolant?
+  x = pdiv(px, psub(qx, px));
+  x = pmadd(cst_2, x, cst_1);
+
+  // Construct the result 2^n * exp(g) = e * x. The max is used to catch
+  // non-finite values in the input.
+  // TODO: replace pldexp with faster implementation since x in [-1, 1).
+  return pmax(pldexp(x,fx), _x);
+}
+
+// The following code is inspired by the following stack-overflow answer:
+//   https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30463616/payne-hanek-algorithm-implementation-in-c/30465751#30465751
+// It has been largely optimized:
+//  - By-pass calls to frexp.
+//  - Aligned loads of required 96 bits of 2/pi. This is accomplished by
+//    (1) balancing the mantissa and exponent to the required bits of 2/pi are
+//    aligned on 8-bits, and (2) replicating the storage of the bits of 2/pi.
+//  - Avoid a branch in rounding and extraction of the remaining fractional part.
+// Overall, I measured a speed up higher than x2 on x86-64.
+inline float trig_reduce_huge (float xf, int *quadrant)
+{
+  using Eigen::numext::int32_t;
+  using Eigen::numext::uint32_t;
+  using Eigen::numext::int64_t;
+  using Eigen::numext::uint64_t;
+
+  const double pio2_62 = 3.4061215800865545e-19;    // pi/2 * 2^-62
+  const uint64_t zero_dot_five = uint64_t(1) << 61; // 0.5 in 2.62-bit fixed-point foramt
+
+  // 192 bits of 2/pi for Payne-Hanek reduction
+  // Bits are introduced by packet of 8 to enable aligned reads.
+  static const uint32_t two_over_pi [] = 
+  {
+    0x00000028, 0x000028be, 0x0028be60, 0x28be60db,
+    0xbe60db93, 0x60db9391, 0xdb939105, 0x9391054a,
+    0x91054a7f, 0x054a7f09, 0x4a7f09d5, 0x7f09d5f4,
+    0x09d5f47d, 0xd5f47d4d, 0xf47d4d37, 0x7d4d3770,
+    0x4d377036, 0x377036d8, 0x7036d8a5, 0x36d8a566,
+    0xd8a5664f, 0xa5664f10, 0x664f10e4, 0x4f10e410,
+    0x10e41000, 0xe4100000
+  };
+  
+  uint32_t xi = numext::bit_cast<uint32_t>(xf);
+  // Below, -118 = -126 + 8.
+  //   -126 is to get the exponent,
+  //   +8 is to enable alignment of 2/pi's bits on 8 bits.
+  // This is possible because the fractional part of x as only 24 meaningful bits.
+  uint32_t e = (xi >> 23) - 118;
+  // Extract the mantissa and shift it to align it wrt the exponent
+  xi = ((xi & 0x007fffffu)| 0x00800000u) << (e & 0x7);
+
+  uint32_t i = e >> 3;
+  uint32_t twoopi_1  = two_over_pi[i-1];
+  uint32_t twoopi_2  = two_over_pi[i+3];
+  uint32_t twoopi_3  = two_over_pi[i+7];
+
+  // Compute x * 2/pi in 2.62-bit fixed-point format.
+  uint64_t p;
+  p = uint64_t(xi) * twoopi_3;
+  p = uint64_t(xi) * twoopi_2 + (p >> 32);
+  p = (uint64_t(xi * twoopi_1) << 32) + p;
+
+  // Round to nearest: add 0.5 and extract integral part.
+  uint64_t q = (p + zero_dot_five) >> 62;
+  *quadrant = int(q);
+  // Now it remains to compute "r = x - q*pi/2" with high accuracy,
+  // since we have p=x/(pi/2) with high accuracy, we can more efficiently compute r as:
+  //   r = (p-q)*pi/2,
+  // where the product can be be carried out with sufficient accuracy using double precision.
+  p -= q<<62;
+  return float(double(int64_t(p)) * pio2_62);
+}
+
+template<bool ComputeSine,typename Packet>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+#if EIGEN_GNUC_AT_LEAST(4,4) && EIGEN_COMP_GNUC_STRICT
+__attribute__((optimize("-fno-unsafe-math-optimizations")))
+#endif
+Packet psincos_float(const Packet& _x)
+{
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::integer_packet PacketI;
+
+  const Packet  cst_2oPI            = pset1<Packet>(0.636619746685028076171875f); // 2/PI
+  const Packet  cst_rounding_magic  = pset1<Packet>(12582912); // 2^23 for rounding
+  const PacketI csti_1              = pset1<PacketI>(1);
+  const Packet  cst_sign_mask       = pset1frombits<Packet>(0x80000000u);
+
+  Packet x = pabs(_x);
+
+  // Scale x by 2/Pi to find x's octant.
+  Packet y = pmul(x, cst_2oPI);
+
+  // Rounding trick:
+  Packet y_round = padd(y, cst_rounding_magic);
+  EIGEN_OPTIMIZATION_BARRIER(y_round)
+  PacketI y_int = preinterpret<PacketI>(y_round); // last 23 digits represent integer (if abs(x)<2^24)
+  y = psub(y_round, cst_rounding_magic); // nearest integer to x*4/pi
+
+  // Reduce x by y octants to get: -Pi/4 <= x <= +Pi/4
+  // using "Extended precision modular arithmetic"
+  #if defined(EIGEN_HAS_SINGLE_INSTRUCTION_MADD)
+  // This version requires true FMA for high accuracy
+  // It provides a max error of 1ULP up to (with absolute_error < 5.9605e-08):
+  const float huge_th = ComputeSine ? 117435.992f : 71476.0625f;
+  x = pmadd(y, pset1<Packet>(-1.57079601287841796875f), x);
+  x = pmadd(y, pset1<Packet>(-3.1391647326017846353352069854736328125e-07f), x);
+  x = pmadd(y, pset1<Packet>(-5.390302529957764765544681040410068817436695098876953125e-15f), x);
+  #else
+  // Without true FMA, the previous set of coefficients maintain 1ULP accuracy
+  // up to x<15.7 (for sin), but accuracy is immediately lost for x>15.7.
+  // We thus use one more iteration to maintain 2ULPs up to reasonably large inputs.
+
+  // The following set of coefficients maintain 1ULP up to 9.43 and 14.16 for sin and cos respectively.
+  // and 2 ULP up to:
+  const float huge_th = ComputeSine ? 25966.f : 18838.f;
+  x = pmadd(y, pset1<Packet>(-1.5703125), x); // = 0xbfc90000
+  EIGEN_OPTIMIZATION_BARRIER(x)
+  x = pmadd(y, pset1<Packet>(-0.000483989715576171875), x); // = 0xb9fdc000
+  EIGEN_OPTIMIZATION_BARRIER(x)
+  x = pmadd(y, pset1<Packet>(1.62865035235881805419921875e-07), x); // = 0x342ee000
+  x = pmadd(y, pset1<Packet>(5.5644315544167710640977020375430583953857421875e-11), x); // = 0x2e74b9ee
+
+  // For the record, the following set of coefficients maintain 2ULP up
+  // to a slightly larger range:
+  // const float huge_th = ComputeSine ? 51981.f : 39086.125f;
+  // but it slightly fails to maintain 1ULP for two values of sin below pi.
+  // x = pmadd(y, pset1<Packet>(-3.140625/2.), x);
+  // x = pmadd(y, pset1<Packet>(-0.00048351287841796875), x);
+  // x = pmadd(y, pset1<Packet>(-3.13855707645416259765625e-07), x);
+  // x = pmadd(y, pset1<Packet>(-6.0771006282767103812147979624569416046142578125e-11), x);
+
+  // For the record, with only 3 iterations it is possible to maintain
+  // 1 ULP up to 3PI (maybe more) and 2ULP up to 255.
+  // The coefficients are: 0xbfc90f80, 0xb7354480, 0x2e74b9ee
+  #endif
+
+  if(predux_any(pcmp_le(pset1<Packet>(huge_th),pabs(_x))))
+  {
+    const int PacketSize = unpacket_traits<Packet>::size;
+    EIGEN_ALIGN_TO_BOUNDARY(sizeof(Packet)) float vals[PacketSize];
+    EIGEN_ALIGN_TO_BOUNDARY(sizeof(Packet)) float x_cpy[PacketSize];
+    EIGEN_ALIGN_TO_BOUNDARY(sizeof(Packet)) int y_int2[PacketSize];
+    pstoreu(vals, pabs(_x));
+    pstoreu(x_cpy, x);
+    pstoreu(y_int2, y_int);
+    for(int k=0; k<PacketSize;++k)
+    {
+      float val = vals[k];
+      if(val>=huge_th && (numext::isfinite)(val))
+        x_cpy[k] = trig_reduce_huge(val,&y_int2[k]);
+    }
+    x = ploadu<Packet>(x_cpy);
+    y_int = ploadu<PacketI>(y_int2);
+  }
+
+  // Compute the sign to apply to the polynomial.
+  // sin: sign = second_bit(y_int) xor signbit(_x)
+  // cos: sign = second_bit(y_int+1)
+  Packet sign_bit = ComputeSine ? pxor(_x, preinterpret<Packet>(plogical_shift_left<30>(y_int)))
+                                : preinterpret<Packet>(plogical_shift_left<30>(padd(y_int,csti_1)));
+  sign_bit = pand(sign_bit, cst_sign_mask); // clear all but left most bit
+
+  // Get the polynomial selection mask from the second bit of y_int
+  // We'll calculate both (sin and cos) polynomials and then select from the two.
+  Packet poly_mask = preinterpret<Packet>(pcmp_eq(pand(y_int, csti_1), pzero(y_int)));
+
+  Packet x2 = pmul(x,x);
+
+  // Evaluate the cos(x) polynomial. (-Pi/4 <= x <= Pi/4)
+  Packet y1 =        pset1<Packet>(2.4372266125283204019069671630859375e-05f);
+  y1 = pmadd(y1, x2, pset1<Packet>(-0.00138865201734006404876708984375f     ));
+  y1 = pmadd(y1, x2, pset1<Packet>(0.041666619479656219482421875f           ));
+  y1 = pmadd(y1, x2, pset1<Packet>(-0.5f));
+  y1 = pmadd(y1, x2, pset1<Packet>(1.f));
+
+  // Evaluate the sin(x) polynomial. (Pi/4 <= x <= Pi/4)
+  // octave/matlab code to compute those coefficients:
+  //    x = (0:0.0001:pi/4)';
+  //    A = [x.^3 x.^5 x.^7];
+  //    w = ((1.-(x/(pi/4)).^2).^5)*2000+1;         # weights trading relative accuracy
+  //    c = (A'*diag(w)*A)\(A'*diag(w)*(sin(x)-x)); # weighted LS, linear coeff forced to 1
+  //    printf('%.64f\n %.64f\n%.64f\n', c(3), c(2), c(1))
+  //
+  Packet y2 =        pset1<Packet>(-0.0001959234114083702898469196984621021329076029360294342041015625f);
+  y2 = pmadd(y2, x2, pset1<Packet>( 0.0083326873655616851693794799871284340042620897293090820312500000f));
+  y2 = pmadd(y2, x2, pset1<Packet>(-0.1666666203982298255503735617821803316473960876464843750000000000f));
+  y2 = pmul(y2, x2);
+  y2 = pmadd(y2, x, x);
+
+  // Select the correct result from the two polynomials.
+  y = ComputeSine ? pselect(poly_mask,y2,y1)
+                  : pselect(poly_mask,y1,y2);
+
+  // Update the sign and filter huge inputs
+  return pxor(y, sign_bit);
+}
+
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+Packet psin_float(const Packet& x)
+{
+  return psincos_float<true>(x);
+}
+
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+Packet pcos_float(const Packet& x)
+{
+  return psincos_float<false>(x);
+}
+
+
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+Packet psqrt_complex(const Packet& a) {
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type Scalar;
+  typedef typename Scalar::value_type RealScalar;
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::as_real RealPacket;
+
+  // Computes the principal sqrt of the complex numbers in the input.
+  //
+  // For example, for packets containing 2 complex numbers stored in interleaved format
+  //    a = [a0, a1] = [x0, y0, x1, y1],
+  // where x0 = real(a0), y0 = imag(a0) etc., this function returns
+  //    b = [b0, b1] = [u0, v0, u1, v1],
+  // such that b0^2 = a0, b1^2 = a1.
+  //
+  // To derive the formula for the complex square roots, let's consider the equation for
+  // a single complex square root of the number x + i*y. We want to find real numbers
+  // u and v such that
+  //    (u + i*v)^2 = x + i*y  <=>
+  //    u^2 - v^2 + i*2*u*v = x + i*v.
+  // By equating the real and imaginary parts we get:
+  //    u^2 - v^2 = x
+  //    2*u*v = y.
+  //
+  // For x >= 0, this has the numerically stable solution
+  //    u = sqrt(0.5 * (x + sqrt(x^2 + y^2)))
+  //    v = 0.5 * (y / u)
+  // and for x < 0,
+  //    v = sign(y) * sqrt(0.5 * (-x + sqrt(x^2 + y^2)))
+  //    u = 0.5 * (y / v)
+  //
+  //  To avoid unnecessary over- and underflow, we compute sqrt(x^2 + y^2) as
+  //     l = max(|x|, |y|) * sqrt(1 + (min(|x|, |y|) / max(|x|, |y|))^2) ,
+
+  // In the following, without lack of generality, we have annotated the code, assuming
+  // that the input is a packet of 2 complex numbers.
+  //
+  // Step 1. Compute l = [l0, l0, l1, l1], where
+  //    l0 = sqrt(x0^2 + y0^2),  l1 = sqrt(x1^2 + y1^2)
+  // To avoid over- and underflow, we use the stable formula for each hypotenuse
+  //    l0 = (min0 == 0 ? max0 : max0 * sqrt(1 + (min0/max0)**2)),
+  // where max0 = max(|x0|, |y0|), min0 = min(|x0|, |y0|), and similarly for l1.
+
+  RealPacket a_abs = pabs(a.v);           // [|x0|, |y0|, |x1|, |y1|]
+  RealPacket a_abs_flip = pcplxflip(Packet(a_abs)).v; // [|y0|, |x0|, |y1|, |x1|]
+  RealPacket a_max = pmax(a_abs, a_abs_flip);
+  RealPacket a_min = pmin(a_abs, a_abs_flip);
+  RealPacket a_min_zero_mask = pcmp_eq(a_min, pzero(a_min));
+  RealPacket a_max_zero_mask = pcmp_eq(a_max, pzero(a_max));
+  RealPacket r = pdiv(a_min, a_max);
+  const RealPacket cst_one  = pset1<RealPacket>(RealScalar(1));
+  RealPacket l = pmul(a_max, psqrt(padd(cst_one, pmul(r, r))));  // [l0, l0, l1, l1]
+  // Set l to a_max if a_min is zero.
+  l = pselect(a_min_zero_mask, a_max, l);
+
+  // Step 2. Compute [rho0, *, rho1, *], where
+  // rho0 = sqrt(0.5 * (l0 + |x0|)), rho1 =  sqrt(0.5 * (l1 + |x1|))
+  // We don't care about the imaginary parts computed here. They will be overwritten later.
+  const RealPacket cst_half = pset1<RealPacket>(RealScalar(0.5));
+  Packet rho;
+  rho.v = psqrt(pmul(cst_half, padd(a_abs, l)));
+
+  // Step 3. Compute [rho0, eta0, rho1, eta1], where
+  // eta0 = (y0 / l0) / 2, and eta1 = (y1 / l1) / 2.
+  // set eta = 0 of input is 0 + i0.
+  RealPacket eta = pandnot(pmul(cst_half, pdiv(a.v, pcplxflip(rho).v)), a_max_zero_mask);
+  RealPacket real_mask = peven_mask(a.v);
+  Packet positive_real_result;
+  // Compute result for inputs with positive real part.
+  positive_real_result.v = pselect(real_mask, rho.v, eta);
+
+  // Step 4. Compute solution for inputs with negative real part:
+  //         [|eta0|, sign(y0)*rho0, |eta1|, sign(y1)*rho1]
+  const RealScalar neg_zero = RealScalar(numext::bit_cast<float>(0x80000000u));
+  const RealPacket cst_imag_sign_mask = pset1<Packet>(Scalar(RealScalar(0.0), neg_zero)).v;
+  RealPacket imag_signs = pand(a.v, cst_imag_sign_mask);
+  Packet negative_real_result;
+  // Notice that rho is positive, so taking it's absolute value is a noop.
+  negative_real_result.v = por(pabs(pcplxflip(positive_real_result).v), imag_signs);
+
+  // Step 5. Select solution branch based on the sign of the real parts.
+  Packet negative_real_mask;
+  negative_real_mask.v = pcmp_lt(pand(real_mask, a.v), pzero(a.v));
+  negative_real_mask.v = por(negative_real_mask.v, pcplxflip(negative_real_mask).v);
+  Packet result = pselect(negative_real_mask, negative_real_result, positive_real_result);
+
+  // Step 6. Handle special cases for infinities:
+  // * If z is (x,+∞), the result is (+∞,+∞) even if x is NaN
+  // * If z is (x,-∞), the result is (+∞,-∞) even if x is NaN
+  // * If z is (-∞,y), the result is (0*|y|,+∞) for finite or NaN y
+  // * If z is (+∞,y), the result is (+∞,0*|y|) for finite or NaN y
+  const RealPacket cst_pos_inf = pset1<RealPacket>(NumTraits<RealScalar>::infinity());
+  Packet is_inf;
+  is_inf.v = pcmp_eq(a_abs, cst_pos_inf);
+  Packet is_real_inf;
+  is_real_inf.v = pand(is_inf.v, real_mask);
+  is_real_inf = por(is_real_inf, pcplxflip(is_real_inf));
+  // prepare packet of (+∞,0*|y|) or (0*|y|,+∞), depending on the sign of the infinite real part.
+  Packet real_inf_result;
+  real_inf_result.v = pmul(a_abs, pset1<Packet>(Scalar(RealScalar(1.0), RealScalar(0.0))).v);
+  real_inf_result.v = pselect(negative_real_mask.v, pcplxflip(real_inf_result).v, real_inf_result.v);
+  // prepare packet of (+∞,+∞) or (+∞,-∞), depending on the sign of the infinite imaginary part.
+  Packet is_imag_inf;
+  is_imag_inf.v = pandnot(is_inf.v, real_mask);
+  is_imag_inf = por(is_imag_inf, pcplxflip(is_imag_inf));
+  Packet imag_inf_result;
+  imag_inf_result.v = por(pand(cst_pos_inf, real_mask), pandnot(a.v, real_mask));
+
+  return  pselect(is_imag_inf, imag_inf_result,
+                  pselect(is_real_inf, real_inf_result,result));
+}
+
+// TODO(rmlarsen): The following set of utilities for double word arithmetic
+// should perhaps be refactored as a separate file, since it would be generally
+// useful for special function implementation etc. Writing the algorithms in
+// terms if a double word type would also make the code more readable.
+
+// This function splits x into the nearest integer n and fractional part r,
+// such that x = n + r holds exactly.
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+void absolute_split(const Packet& x, Packet& n, Packet& r) {
+  n = pround(x);
+  r = psub(x, n);
+}
+
+// This function computes the sum {s, r}, such that x + y = s_hi + s_lo
+// holds exactly, and s_hi = fl(x+y), if |x| >= |y|.
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+void fast_twosum(const Packet& x, const Packet& y, Packet& s_hi, Packet& s_lo) {
+  s_hi = padd(x, y);
+  const Packet t = psub(s_hi, x);
+  s_lo = psub(y, t);
+}
+
+#ifdef EIGEN_HAS_SINGLE_INSTRUCTION_MADD
+// This function implements the extended precision product of
+// a pair of floating point numbers. Given {x, y}, it computes the pair
+// {p_hi, p_lo} such that x * y = p_hi + p_lo holds exactly and
+// p_hi = fl(x * y).
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+void twoprod(const Packet& x, const Packet& y,
+             Packet& p_hi, Packet& p_lo) {
+  p_hi = pmul(x, y);
+  p_lo = pmadd(x, y, pnegate(p_hi));
+}
+
+#else
+
+// This function implements the Veltkamp splitting. Given a floating point
+// number x it returns the pair {x_hi, x_lo} such that x_hi + x_lo = x holds
+// exactly and that half of the significant of x fits in x_hi.
+// This is Algorithm 3 from Jean-Michel Muller, "Elementary Functions",
+// 3rd edition, Birkh\"auser, 2016.
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+void veltkamp_splitting(const Packet& x, Packet& x_hi, Packet& x_lo) {
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type Scalar;
+  EIGEN_CONSTEXPR int shift = (NumTraits<Scalar>::digits() + 1) / 2;
+  const Scalar shift_scale = Scalar(uint64_t(1) << shift);  // Scalar constructor not necessarily constexpr.
+  const Packet gamma = pmul(pset1<Packet>(shift_scale + Scalar(1)), x);
+  Packet rho = psub(x, gamma);
+  x_hi = padd(rho, gamma);
+  x_lo = psub(x, x_hi);
+}
+
+// This function implements Dekker's algorithm for products x * y.
+// Given floating point numbers {x, y} computes the pair
+// {p_hi, p_lo} such that x * y = p_hi + p_lo holds exactly and
+// p_hi = fl(x * y).
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+void twoprod(const Packet& x, const Packet& y,
+             Packet& p_hi, Packet& p_lo) {
+  Packet x_hi, x_lo, y_hi, y_lo;
+  veltkamp_splitting(x, x_hi, x_lo);
+  veltkamp_splitting(y, y_hi, y_lo);
+
+  p_hi = pmul(x, y);
+  p_lo = pmadd(x_hi, y_hi, pnegate(p_hi));
+  p_lo = pmadd(x_hi, y_lo, p_lo);
+  p_lo = pmadd(x_lo, y_hi, p_lo);
+  p_lo = pmadd(x_lo, y_lo, p_lo);
+}
+
+#endif  // EIGEN_HAS_SINGLE_INSTRUCTION_MADD
+
+
+// This function implements Dekker's algorithm for the addition
+// of two double word numbers represented by {x_hi, x_lo} and {y_hi, y_lo}.
+// It returns the result as a pair {s_hi, s_lo} such that
+// x_hi + x_lo + y_hi + y_lo = s_hi + s_lo holds exactly.
+// This is Algorithm 5 from Jean-Michel Muller, "Elementary Functions",
+// 3rd edition, Birkh\"auser, 2016.
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+  void twosum(const Packet& x_hi, const Packet& x_lo,
+              const Packet& y_hi, const Packet& y_lo,
+              Packet& s_hi, Packet& s_lo) {
+  const Packet x_greater_mask = pcmp_lt(pabs(y_hi), pabs(x_hi));
+  Packet r_hi_1, r_lo_1;
+  fast_twosum(x_hi, y_hi,r_hi_1, r_lo_1);
+  Packet r_hi_2, r_lo_2;
+  fast_twosum(y_hi, x_hi,r_hi_2, r_lo_2);
+  const Packet r_hi = pselect(x_greater_mask, r_hi_1, r_hi_2);
+
+  const Packet s1 = padd(padd(y_lo, r_lo_1), x_lo);
+  const Packet s2 = padd(padd(x_lo, r_lo_2), y_lo);
+  const Packet s = pselect(x_greater_mask, s1, s2);
+
+  fast_twosum(r_hi, s, s_hi, s_lo);
+}
+
+// This is a version of twosum for double word numbers,
+// which assumes that |x_hi| >= |y_hi|.
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+  void fast_twosum(const Packet& x_hi, const Packet& x_lo,
+              const Packet& y_hi, const Packet& y_lo,
+              Packet& s_hi, Packet& s_lo) {
+  Packet r_hi, r_lo;
+  fast_twosum(x_hi, y_hi, r_hi, r_lo);
+  const Packet s = padd(padd(y_lo, r_lo), x_lo);
+  fast_twosum(r_hi, s, s_hi, s_lo);
+}
+
+// This is a version of twosum for adding a floating point number x to
+// double word number {y_hi, y_lo} number, with the assumption
+// that |x| >= |y_hi|.
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+void fast_twosum(const Packet& x,
+                 const Packet& y_hi, const Packet& y_lo,
+                 Packet& s_hi, Packet& s_lo) {
+  Packet r_hi, r_lo;
+  fast_twosum(x, y_hi, r_hi, r_lo);
+  const Packet s = padd(y_lo, r_lo);
+  fast_twosum(r_hi, s, s_hi, s_lo);
+}
+
+// This function implements the multiplication of a double word
+// number represented by {x_hi, x_lo} by a floating point number y.
+// It returns the result as a pair {p_hi, p_lo} such that
+// (x_hi + x_lo) * y = p_hi + p_lo hold with a relative error
+// of less than 2*2^{-2p}, where p is the number of significand bit
+// in the floating point type.
+// This is Algorithm 7 from Jean-Michel Muller, "Elementary Functions",
+// 3rd edition, Birkh\"auser, 2016.
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+void twoprod(const Packet& x_hi, const Packet& x_lo, const Packet& y,
+             Packet& p_hi, Packet& p_lo) {
+  Packet c_hi, c_lo1;
+  twoprod(x_hi, y, c_hi, c_lo1);
+  const Packet c_lo2 = pmul(x_lo, y);
+  Packet t_hi, t_lo1;
+  fast_twosum(c_hi, c_lo2, t_hi, t_lo1);
+  const Packet t_lo2 = padd(t_lo1, c_lo1);
+  fast_twosum(t_hi, t_lo2, p_hi, p_lo);
+}
+
+// This function implements the multiplication of two double word
+// numbers represented by {x_hi, x_lo} and {y_hi, y_lo}.
+// It returns the result as a pair {p_hi, p_lo} such that
+// (x_hi + x_lo) * (y_hi + y_lo) = p_hi + p_lo holds with a relative error
+// of less than 2*2^{-2p}, where p is the number of significand bit
+// in the floating point type.
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+void twoprod(const Packet& x_hi, const Packet& x_lo,
+             const Packet& y_hi, const Packet& y_lo,
+             Packet& p_hi, Packet& p_lo) {
+  Packet p_hi_hi, p_hi_lo;
+  twoprod(x_hi, x_lo, y_hi, p_hi_hi, p_hi_lo);
+  Packet p_lo_hi, p_lo_lo;
+  twoprod(x_hi, x_lo, y_lo, p_lo_hi, p_lo_lo);
+  fast_twosum(p_hi_hi, p_hi_lo, p_lo_hi, p_lo_lo, p_hi, p_lo);
+}
+
+// This function computes the reciprocal of a floating point number
+// with extra precision and returns the result as a double word.
+template <typename Packet>
+void doubleword_reciprocal(const Packet& x, Packet& recip_hi, Packet& recip_lo) {
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type Scalar;
+  // 1. Approximate the reciprocal as the reciprocal of the high order element.
+  Packet approx_recip = prsqrt(x);
+  approx_recip = pmul(approx_recip, approx_recip);
+
+  // 2. Run one step of Newton-Raphson iteration in double word arithmetic
+  // to get the bottom half. The NR iteration for reciprocal of 'a' is
+  //    x_{i+1} = x_i * (2 - a * x_i)
+
+  // -a*x_i
+  Packet t1_hi, t1_lo;
+  twoprod(pnegate(x), approx_recip, t1_hi, t1_lo);
+  // 2 - a*x_i
+  Packet t2_hi, t2_lo;
+  fast_twosum(pset1<Packet>(Scalar(2)), t1_hi, t2_hi, t2_lo);
+  Packet t3_hi, t3_lo;
+  fast_twosum(t2_hi, padd(t2_lo, t1_lo), t3_hi, t3_lo);
+  // x_i * (2 - a * x_i)
+  twoprod(t3_hi, t3_lo, approx_recip, recip_hi, recip_lo);
+}
+
+
+// This function computes log2(x) and returns the result as a double word.
+template <typename Scalar>
+struct accurate_log2 {
+  template <typename Packet>
+  EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+  void operator()(const Packet& x, Packet& log2_x_hi, Packet& log2_x_lo) {
+    log2_x_hi = plog2(x);
+    log2_x_lo = pzero(x);
+  }
+};
+
+// This specialization uses a more accurate algorithm to compute log2(x) for
+// floats in [1/sqrt(2);sqrt(2)] with a relative accuracy of ~6.42e-10.
+// This additional accuracy is needed to counter the error-magnification
+// inherent in multiplying by a potentially large exponent in pow(x,y).
+// The minimax polynomial used was calculated using the Sollya tool.
+// See sollya.org.
+template <>
+struct accurate_log2<float> {
+  template <typename Packet>
+  EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+  void operator()(const Packet& z, Packet& log2_x_hi, Packet& log2_x_lo) {
+    // The function log(1+x)/x is approximated in the interval
+    // [1/sqrt(2)-1;sqrt(2)-1] by a degree 10 polynomial of the form
+    //  Q(x) = (C0 + x * (C1 + x * (C2 + x * (C3 + x * P(x))))),
+    // where the degree 6 polynomial P(x) is evaluated in single precision,
+    // while the remaining 4 terms of Q(x), as well as the final multiplication by x
+    // to reconstruct log(1+x) are evaluated in extra precision using
+    // double word arithmetic. C0 through C3 are extra precise constants
+    // stored as double words.
+    //
+    // The polynomial coefficients were calculated using Sollya commands:
+    // > n = 10;
+    // > f = log2(1+x)/x;
+    // > interval = [sqrt(0.5)-1;sqrt(2)-1];
+    // > p = fpminimax(f,n,[|double,double,double,double,single...|],interval,relative,floating);
+    
+    const Packet p6 = pset1<Packet>( 9.703654795885e-2f);
+    const Packet p5 = pset1<Packet>(-0.1690667718648f);
+    const Packet p4 = pset1<Packet>( 0.1720575392246f);
+    const Packet p3 = pset1<Packet>(-0.1789081543684f);
+    const Packet p2 = pset1<Packet>( 0.2050433009862f);
+    const Packet p1 = pset1<Packet>(-0.2404672354459f);
+    const Packet p0 = pset1<Packet>( 0.2885761857032f);
+
+    const Packet C3_hi = pset1<Packet>(-0.360674142838f);
+    const Packet C3_lo = pset1<Packet>(-6.13283912543e-09f);
+    const Packet C2_hi = pset1<Packet>(0.480897903442f);
+    const Packet C2_lo = pset1<Packet>(-1.44861207474e-08f);
+    const Packet C1_hi = pset1<Packet>(-0.721347510815f);
+    const Packet C1_lo = pset1<Packet>(-4.84483164698e-09f);
+    const Packet C0_hi = pset1<Packet>(1.44269502163f);
+    const Packet C0_lo = pset1<Packet>(2.01711713999e-08f);
+    const Packet one = pset1<Packet>(1.0f);
+
+    const Packet x = psub(z, one);
+    // Evaluate P(x) in working precision.
+    // We evaluate it in multiple parts to improve instruction level
+    // parallelism.
+    Packet x2 = pmul(x,x);
+    Packet p_even = pmadd(p6, x2, p4);
+    p_even = pmadd(p_even, x2, p2);
+    p_even = pmadd(p_even, x2, p0);
+    Packet p_odd = pmadd(p5, x2, p3);
+    p_odd = pmadd(p_odd, x2, p1);
+    Packet p = pmadd(p_odd, x, p_even);
+
+    // Now evaluate the low-order tems of Q(x) in double word precision.
+    // In the following, due to the alternating signs and the fact that
+    // |x| < sqrt(2)-1, we can assume that |C*_hi| >= q_i, and use
+    // fast_twosum instead of the slower twosum.
+    Packet q_hi, q_lo;
+    Packet t_hi, t_lo;
+    // C3 + x * p(x)
+    twoprod(p, x, t_hi, t_lo);
+    fast_twosum(C3_hi, C3_lo, t_hi, t_lo, q_hi, q_lo);
+    // C2 + x * p(x)
+    twoprod(q_hi, q_lo, x, t_hi, t_lo);
+    fast_twosum(C2_hi, C2_lo, t_hi, t_lo, q_hi, q_lo);
+    // C1 + x * p(x)
+    twoprod(q_hi, q_lo, x, t_hi, t_lo);
+    fast_twosum(C1_hi, C1_lo, t_hi, t_lo, q_hi, q_lo);
+    // C0 + x * p(x)
+    twoprod(q_hi, q_lo, x, t_hi, t_lo);
+    fast_twosum(C0_hi, C0_lo, t_hi, t_lo, q_hi, q_lo);
+
+    // log(z) ~= x * Q(x)
+    twoprod(q_hi, q_lo, x, log2_x_hi, log2_x_lo);
+  }
+};
+
+// This specialization uses a more accurate algorithm to compute log2(x) for
+// floats in [1/sqrt(2);sqrt(2)] with a relative accuracy of ~1.27e-18.
+// This additional accuracy is needed to counter the error-magnification
+// inherent in multiplying by a potentially large exponent in pow(x,y).
+// The minimax polynomial used was calculated using the Sollya tool.
+// See sollya.org.
+
+template <>
+struct accurate_log2<double> {
+  template <typename Packet>
+  EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+  void operator()(const Packet& x, Packet& log2_x_hi, Packet& log2_x_lo) {
+    // We use a transformation of variables:
+    //    r = c * (x-1) / (x+1),
+    // such that
+    //    log2(x) = log2((1 + r/c) / (1 - r/c)) = f(r).
+    // The function f(r) can be approximated well using an odd polynomial
+    // of the form
+    //   P(r) = ((Q(r^2) * r^2 + C) * r^2 + 1) * r,
+    // For the implementation of log2<double> here, Q is of degree 6 with
+    // coefficient represented in working precision (double), while C is a
+    // constant represented in extra precision as a double word to achieve
+    // full accuracy.
+    //
+    // The polynomial coefficients were computed by the Sollya script:
+    //
+    // c = 2 / log(2);
+    // trans = c * (x-1)/(x+1);
+    // itrans = (1+x/c)/(1-x/c);
+    // interval=[trans(sqrt(0.5)); trans(sqrt(2))];
+    // print(interval);
+    // f = log2(itrans(x));
+    // p=fpminimax(f,[|1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17|],[|1,DD,double...|],interval,relative,floating);
+    const Packet q12 = pset1<Packet>(2.87074255468000586e-9);
+    const Packet q10 = pset1<Packet>(2.38957980901884082e-8);
+    const Packet q8 = pset1<Packet>(2.31032094540014656e-7);
+    const Packet q6 = pset1<Packet>(2.27279857398537278e-6);
+    const Packet q4 = pset1<Packet>(2.31271023278625638e-5);
+    const Packet q2 = pset1<Packet>(2.47556738444535513e-4);
+    const Packet q0 = pset1<Packet>(2.88543873228900172e-3);
+    const Packet C_hi = pset1<Packet>(0.0400377511598501157);
+    const Packet C_lo = pset1<Packet>(-4.77726582251425391e-19);
+    const Packet one = pset1<Packet>(1.0);
+
+    const Packet cst_2_log2e_hi = pset1<Packet>(2.88539008177792677);
+    const Packet cst_2_log2e_lo = pset1<Packet>(4.07660016854549667e-17);
+    // c * (x - 1)
+    Packet num_hi, num_lo;
+    twoprod(cst_2_log2e_hi, cst_2_log2e_lo, psub(x, one), num_hi, num_lo);
+    // TODO(rmlarsen): Investigate if using the division algorithm by
+    // Muller et al. is faster/more accurate.
+    // 1 / (x + 1)
+    Packet denom_hi, denom_lo;
+    doubleword_reciprocal(padd(x, one), denom_hi, denom_lo);
+    // r =  c * (x-1) / (x+1),
+    Packet r_hi, r_lo;
+    twoprod(num_hi, num_lo, denom_hi, denom_lo, r_hi, r_lo);
+    // r2 = r * r
+    Packet r2_hi, r2_lo;
+    twoprod(r_hi, r_lo, r_hi, r_lo, r2_hi, r2_lo);
+    // r4 = r2 * r2
+    Packet r4_hi, r4_lo;
+    twoprod(r2_hi, r2_lo, r2_hi, r2_lo, r4_hi, r4_lo);
+
+    // Evaluate Q(r^2) in working precision. We evaluate it in two parts
+    // (even and odd in r^2) to improve instruction level parallelism.
+    Packet q_even = pmadd(q12, r4_hi, q8);
+    Packet q_odd = pmadd(q10, r4_hi, q6);
+    q_even = pmadd(q_even, r4_hi, q4);
+    q_odd = pmadd(q_odd, r4_hi, q2);
+    q_even = pmadd(q_even, r4_hi, q0);
+    Packet q = pmadd(q_odd, r2_hi, q_even);
+
+    // Now evaluate the low order terms of P(x) in double word precision.
+    // In the following, due to the increasing magnitude of the coefficients
+    // and r being constrained to [-0.5, 0.5] we can use fast_twosum instead
+    // of the slower twosum.
+    // Q(r^2) * r^2
+    Packet p_hi, p_lo;
+    twoprod(r2_hi, r2_lo, q, p_hi, p_lo);
+    // Q(r^2) * r^2 + C
+    Packet p1_hi, p1_lo;
+    fast_twosum(C_hi, C_lo, p_hi, p_lo, p1_hi, p1_lo);
+    // (Q(r^2) * r^2 + C) * r^2
+    Packet p2_hi, p2_lo;
+    twoprod(r2_hi, r2_lo, p1_hi, p1_lo, p2_hi, p2_lo);
+    // ((Q(r^2) * r^2 + C) * r^2 + 1)
+    Packet p3_hi, p3_lo;
+    fast_twosum(one, p2_hi, p2_lo, p3_hi, p3_lo);
+
+    // log(z) ~= ((Q(r^2) * r^2 + C) * r^2 + 1) * r
+    twoprod(p3_hi, p3_lo, r_hi, r_lo, log2_x_hi, log2_x_lo);
+  }
+};
+
+// This function computes exp2(x) (i.e. 2**x).
+template <typename Scalar>
+struct fast_accurate_exp2 {
+  template <typename Packet>
+  EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+  Packet operator()(const Packet& x) {
+    // TODO(rmlarsen): Add a pexp2 packetop.
+    return pexp(pmul(pset1<Packet>(Scalar(EIGEN_LN2)), x));
+  }
+};
+
+// This specialization uses a faster algorithm to compute exp2(x) for floats
+// in [-0.5;0.5] with a relative accuracy of 1 ulp.
+// The minimax polynomial used was calculated using the Sollya tool.
+// See sollya.org.
+template <>
+struct fast_accurate_exp2<float> {
+  template <typename Packet>
+  EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+  Packet operator()(const Packet& x) {
+    // This function approximates exp2(x) by a degree 6 polynomial of the form
+    // Q(x) = 1 + x * (C + x * P(x)), where the degree 4 polynomial P(x) is evaluated in
+    // single precision, and the remaining steps are evaluated with extra precision using
+    // double word arithmetic. C is an extra precise constant stored as a double word.
+    //
+    // The polynomial coefficients were calculated using Sollya commands:
+    // > n = 6;
+    // > f = 2^x;
+    // > interval = [-0.5;0.5];
+    // > p = fpminimax(f,n,[|1,double,single...|],interval,relative,floating);
+
+    const Packet p4 = pset1<Packet>(1.539513905e-4f);
+    const Packet p3 = pset1<Packet>(1.340007293e-3f);
+    const Packet p2 = pset1<Packet>(9.618283249e-3f);
+    const Packet p1 = pset1<Packet>(5.550328270e-2f);
+    const Packet p0 = pset1<Packet>(0.2402264923f);
+
+    const Packet C_hi = pset1<Packet>(0.6931471825f);
+    const Packet C_lo = pset1<Packet>(2.36836577e-08f);
+    const Packet one = pset1<Packet>(1.0f);
+
+    // Evaluate P(x) in working precision.
+    // We evaluate even and odd parts of the polynomial separately
+    // to gain some instruction level parallelism.
+    Packet x2 = pmul(x,x);
+    Packet p_even = pmadd(p4, x2, p2);
+    Packet p_odd = pmadd(p3, x2, p1);
+    p_even = pmadd(p_even, x2, p0);
+    Packet p = pmadd(p_odd, x, p_even);
+
+    // Evaluate the remaining terms of Q(x) with extra precision using
+    // double word arithmetic.
+    Packet p_hi, p_lo;
+    // x * p(x)
+    twoprod(p, x, p_hi, p_lo);
+    // C + x * p(x)
+    Packet q1_hi, q1_lo;
+    twosum(p_hi, p_lo, C_hi, C_lo, q1_hi, q1_lo);
+    // x * (C + x * p(x))
+    Packet q2_hi, q2_lo;
+    twoprod(q1_hi, q1_lo, x, q2_hi, q2_lo);
+    // 1 + x * (C + x * p(x))
+    Packet q3_hi, q3_lo;
+    // Since |q2_hi| <= sqrt(2)-1 < 1, we can use fast_twosum
+    // for adding it to unity here.
+    fast_twosum(one, q2_hi, q3_hi, q3_lo);
+    return padd(q3_hi, padd(q2_lo, q3_lo));
+  }
+};
+
+// in [-0.5;0.5] with a relative accuracy of 1 ulp.
+// The minimax polynomial used was calculated using the Sollya tool.
+// See sollya.org.
+template <>
+struct fast_accurate_exp2<double> {
+  template <typename Packet>
+  EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
+  Packet operator()(const Packet& x) {
+    // This function approximates exp2(x) by a degree 10 polynomial of the form
+    // Q(x) = 1 + x * (C + x * P(x)), where the degree 8 polynomial P(x) is evaluated in
+    // single precision, and the remaining steps are evaluated with extra precision using
+    // double word arithmetic. C is an extra precise constant stored as a double word.
+    //
+    // The polynomial coefficients were calculated using Sollya commands:
+    // > n = 11;
+    // > f = 2^x;
+    // > interval = [-0.5;0.5];
+    // > p = fpminimax(f,n,[|1,DD,double...|],interval,relative,floating);
+
+    const Packet p9 = pset1<Packet>(4.431642109085495276e-10);
+    const Packet p8 = pset1<Packet>(7.073829923303358410e-9);
+    const Packet p7 = pset1<Packet>(1.017822306737031311e-7);
+    const Packet p6 = pset1<Packet>(1.321543498017646657e-6);
+    const Packet p5 = pset1<Packet>(1.525273342728892877e-5);
+    const Packet p4 = pset1<Packet>(1.540353045780084423e-4);
+    const Packet p3 = pset1<Packet>(1.333355814685869807e-3);
+    const Packet p2 = pset1<Packet>(9.618129107593478832e-3);
+    const Packet p1 = pset1<Packet>(5.550410866481961247e-2);
+    const Packet p0 = pset1<Packet>(0.240226506959101332);
+    const Packet C_hi = pset1<Packet>(0.693147180559945286); 
+    const Packet C_lo = pset1<Packet>(4.81927865669806721e-17);
+    const Packet one = pset1<Packet>(1.0);
+
+    // Evaluate P(x) in working precision.
+    // We evaluate even and odd parts of the polynomial separately
+    // to gain some instruction level parallelism.
+    Packet x2 = pmul(x,x);
+    Packet p_even = pmadd(p8, x2, p6);
+    Packet p_odd = pmadd(p9, x2, p7);
+    p_even = pmadd(p_even, x2, p4);
+    p_odd = pmadd(p_odd, x2, p5);
+    p_even = pmadd(p_even, x2, p2);
+    p_odd = pmadd(p_odd, x2, p3);
+    p_even = pmadd(p_even, x2, p0);
+    p_odd = pmadd(p_odd, x2, p1);
+    Packet p = pmadd(p_odd, x, p_even);
+
+    // Evaluate the remaining terms of Q(x) with extra precision using
+    // double word arithmetic.
+    Packet p_hi, p_lo;
+    // x * p(x)
+    twoprod(p, x, p_hi, p_lo);
+    // C + x * p(x)
+    Packet q1_hi, q1_lo;
+    twosum(p_hi, p_lo, C_hi, C_lo, q1_hi, q1_lo);
+    // x * (C + x * p(x))
+    Packet q2_hi, q2_lo;
+    twoprod(q1_hi, q1_lo, x, q2_hi, q2_lo);
+    // 1 + x * (C + x * p(x))
+    Packet q3_hi, q3_lo;
+    // Since |q2_hi| <= sqrt(2)-1 < 1, we can use fast_twosum
+    // for adding it to unity here.
+    fast_twosum(one, q2_hi, q3_hi, q3_lo);
+    return padd(q3_hi, padd(q2_lo, q3_lo));
+  }
+};
+
+// This function implements the non-trivial case of pow(x,y) where x is
+// positive and y is (possibly) non-integer.
+// Formally, pow(x,y) = exp2(y * log2(x)), where exp2(x) is shorthand for 2^x.
+// TODO(rmlarsen): We should probably add this as a packet up 'ppow', to make it
+// easier to specialize or turn off for specific types and/or backends.x
+template <typename Packet>
+EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE Packet generic_pow_impl(const Packet& x, const Packet& y) {
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type Scalar;
+  // Split x into exponent e_x and mantissa m_x.
+  Packet e_x;
+  Packet m_x = pfrexp(x, e_x);
+
+  // Adjust m_x to lie in [1/sqrt(2):sqrt(2)] to minimize absolute error in log2(m_x).
+  EIGEN_CONSTEXPR Scalar sqrt_half = Scalar(0.70710678118654752440);
+  const Packet m_x_scale_mask = pcmp_lt(m_x, pset1<Packet>(sqrt_half));
+  m_x = pselect(m_x_scale_mask, pmul(pset1<Packet>(Scalar(2)), m_x), m_x);
+  e_x = pselect(m_x_scale_mask, psub(e_x, pset1<Packet>(Scalar(1))), e_x);
+
+  // Compute log2(m_x) with 6 extra bits of accuracy.
+  Packet rx_hi, rx_lo;
+  accurate_log2<Scalar>()(m_x, rx_hi, rx_lo);
+
+  // Compute the two terms {y * e_x, y * r_x} in f = y * log2(x) with doubled
+  // precision using double word arithmetic.
+  Packet f1_hi, f1_lo, f2_hi, f2_lo;
+  twoprod(e_x, y, f1_hi, f1_lo);
+  twoprod(rx_hi, rx_lo, y, f2_hi, f2_lo);
+  // Sum the two terms in f using double word arithmetic. We know
+  // that |e_x| > |log2(m_x)|, except for the case where e_x==0.
+  // This means that we can use fast_twosum(f1,f2).
+  // In the case e_x == 0, e_x * y = f1 = 0, so we don't lose any
+  // accuracy by violating the assumption of fast_twosum, because
+  // it's a no-op.
+  Packet f_hi, f_lo;
+  fast_twosum(f1_hi, f1_lo, f2_hi, f2_lo, f_hi, f_lo);
+
+  // Split f into integer and fractional parts.
+  Packet n_z, r_z;
+  absolute_split(f_hi, n_z, r_z);
+  r_z = padd(r_z, f_lo);
+  Packet n_r;
+  absolute_split(r_z, n_r, r_z);
+  n_z = padd(n_z, n_r);
+
+  // We now have an accurate split of f = n_z + r_z and can compute
+  //   x^y = 2**{n_z + r_z) = exp2(r_z) * 2**{n_z}.
+  // Since r_z is in [-0.5;0.5], we compute the first factor to high accuracy
+  // using a specialized algorithm. Multiplication by the second factor can
+  // be done exactly using pldexp(), since it is an integer power of 2.
+  const Packet e_r = fast_accurate_exp2<Scalar>()(r_z);
+  return pldexp(e_r, n_z);
+}
+
+// Generic implementation of pow(x,y).
+template<typename Packet>
+EIGEN_DEFINE_FUNCTION_ALLOWING_MULTIPLE_DEFINITIONS
+EIGEN_UNUSED
+Packet generic_pow(const Packet& x, const Packet& y) {
+  typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type Scalar;
+
+  const Packet cst_pos_inf = pset1<Packet>(NumTraits<Scalar>::infinity());
+  const Packet cst_zero = pset1<Packet>(Scalar(0));
+  const Packet cst_one = pset1<Packet>(Scalar(1));
+  const Packet cst_nan = pset1<Packet>(NumTraits<Scalar>::quiet_NaN());
+
+  const Packet abs_x = pabs(x);
+  // Predicates for sign and magnitude of x.
+  const Packet x_is_zero = pcmp_eq(x, cst_zero);
+  const Packet x_is_neg = pcmp_lt(x, cst_zero);
+  const Packet abs_x_is_inf = pcmp_eq(abs_x, cst_pos_inf);
+  const Packet abs_x_is_one =  pcmp_eq(abs_x, cst_one);
+  const Packet abs_x_is_gt_one = pcmp_lt(cst_one, abs_x);
+  const Packet abs_x_is_lt_one = pcmp_lt(abs_x, cst_one);
+  const Packet x_is_one =  pandnot(abs_x_is_one, x_is_neg);
+  const Packet x_is_neg_one =  pand(abs_x_is_one, x_is_neg);
+  const Packet x_is_nan = pandnot(ptrue(x), pcmp_eq(x, x));
+
+  // Predicates for sign and magnitude of y.
+  const Packet y_is_one = pcmp_eq(y, cst_one);
+  const Packet y_is_zero = pcmp_eq(y, cst_zero);
+  const Packet y_is_neg = pcmp_lt(y, cst_zero);
+  const Packet y_is_pos = pandnot(ptrue(y), por(y_is_zero, y_is_neg));
+  const Packet y_is_nan = pandnot(ptrue(y), pcmp_eq(y, y));
+  const Packet abs_y_is_inf = pcmp_eq(pabs(y), cst_pos_inf);
+  EIGEN_CONSTEXPR Scalar huge_exponent =
+      (NumTraits<Scalar>::max_exponent() * Scalar(EIGEN_LN2)) /
+       NumTraits<Scalar>::epsilon();
+  const Packet abs_y_is_huge = pcmp_le(pset1<Packet>(huge_exponent), pabs(y));
+
+  // Predicates for whether y is integer and/or even.
+  const Packet y_is_int = pcmp_eq(pfloor(y), y);
+  const Packet y_div_2 = pmul(y, pset1<Packet>(Scalar(0.5)));
+  const Packet y_is_even = pcmp_eq(pround(y_div_2), y_div_2);
+
+  // Predicates encoding special cases for the value of pow(x,y)
+  const Packet invalid_negative_x = pandnot(pandnot(pandnot(x_is_neg, abs_x_is_inf),
+                                                    y_is_int),
+                                            abs_y_is_inf);
+  const Packet pow_is_one = por(por(x_is_one, y_is_zero),
+                                pand(x_is_neg_one,
+                                     por(abs_y_is_inf, pandnot(y_is_even, invalid_negative_x))));
+  const Packet pow_is_nan = por(invalid_negative_x, por(x_is_nan, y_is_nan));
+  const Packet pow_is_zero = por(por(por(pand(x_is_zero, y_is_pos),
+                                         pand(abs_x_is_inf, y_is_neg)),
+                                     pand(pand(abs_x_is_lt_one, abs_y_is_huge),
+                                          y_is_pos)),
+                                 pand(pand(abs_x_is_gt_one, abs_y_is_huge),
+                                      y_is_neg));
+  const Packet pow_is_inf = por(por(por(pand(x_is_zero, y_is_neg),
+                                        pand(abs_x_is_inf, y_is_pos)),
+                                    pand(pand(abs_x_is_lt_one, abs_y_is_huge),
+                                         y_is_neg)),
+                                pand(pand(abs_x_is_gt_one, abs_y_is_huge),
+                                     y_is_pos));
+
+  // General computation of pow(x,y) for positive x or negative x and integer y.
+  const Packet negate_pow_abs = pandnot(x_is_neg, y_is_even);
+  const Packet pow_abs = generic_pow_impl(abs_x, y);
+  return pselect(y_is_one, x,
+                 pselect(pow_is_one, cst_one,
+                         pselect(pow_is_nan, cst_nan,
+                                 pselect(pow_is_inf, cst_pos_inf,
+                                         pselect(pow_is_zero, cst_zero,
+                                                 pselect(negate_pow_abs, pnegate(pow_abs), pow_abs))))));
+}
+
+
+
+/* polevl (modified for Eigen)
+ *
+ *      Evaluate polynomial
+ *
+ *
+ *
+ * SYNOPSIS:
+ *
+ * int N;
+ * Scalar x, y, coef[N+1];
+ *
+ * y = polevl<decltype(x), N>( x, coef);
+ *
+ *
+ *
+ * DESCRIPTION:
+ *
+ * Evaluates polynomial of degree N:
+ *
+ *                     2          N
+ * y  =  C  + C x + C x  +...+ C x
+ *        0    1     2          N
+ *
+ * Coefficients are stored in reverse order:
+ *
+ * coef[0] = C  , ..., coef[N] = C  .
+ *            N                   0
+ *
+ *  The function p1evl() assumes that coef[N] = 1.0 and is
+ * omitted from the array.  Its calling arguments are
+ * otherwise the same as polevl().
+ *
+ *
+ * The Eigen implementation is templatized.  For best speed, store
+ * coef as a const array (constexpr), e.g.
+ *
+ * const double coef[] = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0, ...};
+ *
+ */
+template <typename Packet, int N>
+struct ppolevl {
+  static EIGEN_DEVICE_FUNC EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE Packet run(const Packet& x, const typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type coeff[]) {
+    EIGEN_STATIC_ASSERT((N > 0), YOU_MADE_A_PROGRAMMING_MISTAKE);
+    return pmadd(ppolevl<Packet, N-1>::run(x, coeff), x, pset1<Packet>(coeff[N]));
+  }
+};
+
+template <typename Packet>
+struct ppolevl<Packet, 0> {
+  static EIGEN_DEVICE_FUNC EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE Packet run(const Packet& x, const typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type coeff[]) {
+    EIGEN_UNUSED_VARIABLE(x);
+    return pset1<Packet>(coeff[0]);
+  }
+};
+
+/* chbevl (modified for Eigen)
+ *
+ *     Evaluate Chebyshev series
+ *
+ *
+ *
+ * SYNOPSIS:
+ *
+ * int N;
+ * Scalar x, y, coef[N], chebevl();
+ *
+ * y = chbevl( x, coef, N );
+ *
+ *
+ *
+ * DESCRIPTION:
+ *
+ * Evaluates the series
+ *
+ *        N-1
+ *         - '
+ *  y  =   >   coef[i] T (x/2)
+ *         -            i
+ *        i=0
+ *
+ * of Chebyshev polynomials Ti at argument x/2.
+ *
+ * Coefficients are stored in reverse order, i.e. the zero
+ * order term is last in the array.  Note N is the number of
+ * coefficients, not the order.
+ *
+ * If coefficients are for the interval a to b, x must
+ * have been transformed to x -> 2(2x - b - a)/(b-a) before
+ * entering the routine.  This maps x from (a, b) to (-1, 1),
+ * over which the Chebyshev polynomials are defined.
+ *
+ * If the coefficients are for the inverted interval, in
+ * which (a, b) is mapped to (1/b, 1/a), the transformation
+ * required is x -> 2(2ab/x - b - a)/(b-a).  If b is infinity,
+ * this becomes x -> 4a/x - 1.
+ *
+ *
+ *
+ * SPEED:
+ *
+ * Taking advantage of the recurrence properties of the
+ * Chebyshev polynomials, the routine requires one more
+ * addition per loop than evaluating a nested polynomial of
+ * the same degree.
+ *
+ */
+
+template <typename Packet, int N>
+struct pchebevl {
+  EIGEN_DEVICE_FUNC
+  static EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE Packet run(Packet x, const typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type coef[]) {
+    typedef typename unpacket_traits<Packet>::type Scalar;
+    Packet b0 = pset1<Packet>(coef[0]);
+    Packet b1 = pset1<Packet>(static_cast<Scalar>(0.f));
+    Packet b2;
+
+    for (int i = 1; i < N; i++) {
+      b2 = b1;
+      b1 = b0;
+      b0 = psub(pmadd(x, b1, pset1<Packet>(coef[i])), b2);
+    }
+
+    return pmul(pset1<Packet>(static_cast<Scalar>(0.5f)), psub(b0, b2));
+  }
+};
+
+} // end namespace internal
+} // end namespace Eigen
+
+#endif // EIGEN_ARCH_GENERIC_PACKET_MATH_FUNCTIONS_H